Angela (1977) Poster

(1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Incest the Topic
alicecbr14 April 2000
Warning: Spoilers
I guess it shows how really square I am that I kept praying, "Please let her figure it out before she 'does it'." All to no avail. John Vernon of 'Animal House' does a great job of a killer husband, home from the war to Canada where he's met with a new baby. It goes down hill from there. John Huston is really great, as you see him play a Mafioso chieftain whose anger at Sophia Loren makes him start the action that ends in death and incest (not necessarily in that order). He is the pivotal character and unfortunately, make-up couldn't take the bags away from under his eyes to make him look as young as he needed to be in the beginning.

My copy of the movie is really bad, but Railsback does a great job of playing a love-struck kid and Sophia does a wonderful job of playing the aging grieving mother long before she was actually that age. He and his father have some very touching scenes. It's still hard to believe that the grande dame of cinema has never had plastic surgery. She is SO beautiful!!!

A few irrationalities: why the best friend can't be very specific as she warns Sophia about carrying on the relationship. Doesn't Canada notify folks when someone is coming up for a parole hearing? How could she have been caught so unawares?

The shots of snowy Canada are beautiful, especially as you see Sophia walking among the birches in her shearling jacket. The love scenes are especially touching until the denouement, when their punishment arrives. How COULD it else have ended, with him marrying her and their living happily ever after?
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great adaption of Oedipus
VoyagerMN198628 August 2013
This film is quite a good adaption of Oedpipus.

I just happened to see the review by IMDb user "parkerr86302." Parker's review shows how people who don't know basic cultural history and don't have any exposure to the classics can be frustrated by the basic human themes. Note he writes: " This also makes the screenwriter's climactic punishment of them despicable and obscene. Why should they be punished for something they know nothing about?" That is exactly the point. Oedipus' sin is not one of knowledge. It is one of commission without knowledge. For the ancient Greeks these sins were not mitigated by ignorance. Oedipus and Jocasta were not spared due to their ignorance of their familial relationship and ancient audiences would not have seen them as innocent. Terrible things are happening to Thebes due to their sin regardless of the fact that they did not know if it.

One cannot apply modern western Christian ideas of innocence from ignorance of sin to the mores of the Oedipus myth.

Once you understand those parameters you can appreciate this Oedipus adaption. The writing is fairly good.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unconvincing Canadian melodrama
lor_6 February 2023
My review was written in April 1984 after viewing the movie on Embassy video cassette.

"Angela" is a competently-made but uninvolving melodrama shot in Montreal at the end of 1976. Reviewed here for the record as it finally appears in the home video market, domestically unreleased film had foreign playdates only.

Production history was a troubled one, with directors Benjamin Manaster and Sidney J. Furie replaced and the late Boris Sagal taking over. As with other tax shelter-financed entries during the Canadian production boom, pic is copyrighted by a financial institution, the Montreal Trust Co.

Prolog is set during the Korean War, with Angela Kincaid (Sophia Loren) giving birth to a child while her husband Ben (John Vernon) is off fighting. Upon his return, Ben accuses her of promiscuity, does not believe the kid is his and then ends up in jail on a long stretch after Angela finks on him concerning a gun-running caper for local gangster Hogan (John Huston).

Shifting 20-plus years ahead to 1976 (with Loren and several other cast members not aging at all), Angela is a successful restaurant manager who falls in love with a young man, Jean Labrecque (Steve Railsback), who is actually her son, whom she had given up for dead, kidnapped as an infant by Hogan and given to foster parents.

Melodrama pays off with a vengeful husband Ben released from prison gunning for Angela plus Angela's inevitable realization that she has unwittingly been engaged in incestuous relations.

Atmospherically filmed, picture is unfortunately flat and suffers emotionally from an unsatisfying ending. General format, including a fine, melancholy Henry Mancini musical score, realls the surprise 1976 hit, "The Sailor Who Feel from Grace with the Sea"; a sexually repressed mature (but beautiful) woman letting go in a torrid affair.

Unfortunately, though the handsome Sophia Loren is well-cast, film's erotic content is nil and would qualify for roughly a PG rating if submitted for same.

Performing is rather low-key, with Steve Railsback playing the son's part as so friendly and pleasant that the character comes off as mentally challenged. Guest star John Huston is effective in a tailor-made role of the local gangster, playing checkers all day with his black henchman at a cafe, and carrying obvious mythological overtones as he carelessly determines the destinies of the other characters.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Maddeningly Disjointed
parkerr8630218 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The film tries to draw viewers with sensational promises of mother and son incest, but it is just a big tease. In the film, mother and son don't realize who they are, so the incestuous secret in known only to the audience. So what's the point in having it at all? The man never realizes the older woman he's sleeping with is his mother, and while Sophia begins to "suspect" by film's end, she never really finds out either. This also makes the screenwriter's climactic punishment of them despicable and obscene. Why should they be punished for something they know nothing about? As for the rest of the film, the gangster subplot is ludicrous. The film's only saving grace is John Huston, who, despite his own claims of not taking his acting roles that seriously, was never boring on screen. The film is a truly sad waste of talent.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed