Julia (1977) Poster

(1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
68 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
What a cast! What a production!
BookWorm-214 February 1999
Just cast an eye at the credits (Jane Fonda, Vanessa Redgrave, Jason Robards, Maximillian Schell, Hal Holbroke, Meryl Streep, John Glover and others directed by Fred Zinneman in a story by Lillian Hellman) and you know this film is worth seeing. It delivers fabulous performances by some of the best actors of our time, in a carefully -- yeah, sumptuously -- produced film directed by one of Hollywood's most respected veterans, based on a narrative by a gifted dramatist and tale-spinner.

The screenplay blends the two longest episodes in Lillian Hellman's PENTIMENTO, the third, most engaging, and most imaginative of her memoirs. It traces the (largely factual) struggle of Hellman to develop her talents as a playwright under the tutelage of her long-time lover, Dashiell Hammett, and the (largely fictional) course of her friendship with an anti-Nazi activist. The character of Julia seems to be part fantasy, part composite of women Hellman admired.

The film suffers from this blend of fact and fiction and even more from the episodic nature of the intermixed stories. In addition (and to its credit), it does not minimize Hellman's famously abrasive personality. But the characters are so compelling, the performances so outstanding, and the pacing so canny that it holds the viewer's interest for a full two hours.

A flawed but fascinating flick!
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A great movie
JasparLamarCrabb12 February 2006
Fred Zinnemann's last great movie. Based on part of Lillian Hellman's memoir, the film stars Jane Fonda as Hellman as she recounts her friendship with the enigmatic JULIA, played by Vanessa Redgrave. Fonda is a bit too pretty to be entirely convincing as the homely Hellman, but she gives a gutsy performance, playing well with Redgrave and, to a greater degree, Jason Robards, who plays Dashell Hammett. Alvin Sargent's screenplay cleverly bends time, jumping back and forth as the story of Hellman's friendship with Julia is told. Zinnemann creates a melancholy feel that's sustained throughout. The movie has a deliberate pace not usually allowed in Hollywood. The excellent music by Georges Delerue is haunting and the cinematography by the under-appreciated Douglas Slocombe is beautiful. The supporting cast features Maximillian Schell, Cathleen Nesbitt as Julia's grandmother, Meryl Streep, Rosemary Murphy as Dorothy Parker and Hal Holbrook as Parker's husband Alan Campbell. They're all terrific with the exception of Holbrook, who tries to convey a witty raconteur, but only makes Campbell out to be a real jerk.
32 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Redgrave shines in "Julia," despite controversy
rbarrett-125 November 2005
Most remarkable, to me, about "Julia" is the understated acting of Vanessa Redgrave. For the amount of time she's on the screen, one would not assume her to be worthy of an Academy Award nomination, let alone the Oscar itself (1977, Best Supporting Actress). But there is something about that marvelous, tension-filled scene in the Berlin restaurant that comes across as nothing short of superior. Much the same can be said of Jason Robards as Dashiell Hammett, i.e. understated and short, and he, too, got the equivalent Oscar, rightfully outpointing co-star Maximillian Schell. What I had supposed would be a "chick flick" faux-biopic turned out to be a gripping drama on the highest order worth four stars from me.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
While probably not at all true, it is a well acted and directed film.
planktonrules29 March 2013
"Lillian Hellman in her own mind owned half the Spanish Civil War, while Hemingway owned the other half. She would portray herself in situations that were not true. An extremely talented, brilliant writer, but she was a phony character, I'm sorry to say. My relations with her were very guarded and ended in pure hatred." This is a quote from Fred Zinneman--the man who directed "Julia" and who, apparently, was angry that this supposedly true story turned out to be a fabrication by Hellman. The story behind "Julia" is from "Pentimento"--a fictional memoir (how can you have a FICTIONAL memoir?) by Hellman which was published in 1973. This is because although Hellman described the events as having happened to her, according to several sources, they apparently occurred to another woman, Muriel Gardner.

Despite the story most likely being a lie, the film itself is quite well made. The location shooting was quite nice and Jane Fonda (as Hellman) and the director did very well. It's odd, then, that Oscars went to Jason Robards and Vanessa Redgrave (Julia), as both (particularly Redgrave) were barely in the film. Additionally, Maximillian Schell was nominated even though his role was minuscule in the film (as one reviewer said, he was nominated for 'eating eggs'). Overall, a taut and lovely story. Too bad it's just not real--especially since Hellman's story practically portrays her as a saint!!
20 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Two Girls
harrypaulson-11122 February 2014
Friendships and love. Memory and longing. A film that lets you dwell without forcing you to. The story, a true account, told by Lillian Hellman in "Pentimento" was debased by one of Hellman's fans that became her assistant. Imagine. Trying to destroy your mentor. Real or imaginary the story lived in Hellman's heart and mind. Fred Zinnemann created a world for the story to acquire a true human dimension. A triumph. Jane Fonda and Vanessa Redgrave are extraordinary as the inseparable childhood friends, Lilli and Julia. Jason Robards, is utterly wonderful as Dashiell Hammett. The film is also the first for Meryl Streep in a short, very short but memorable character. The script by Alvin Sargent, magnificent. Highly recommended.
74 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
How Lillian Hellman saw the world around her, and despite personal success, was never satisfied with the injustice of it all.
aaronlsl27 October 2002
A brilliantly acted masterpiece that thrives on a long time personal conflict many have with idealism versus self indulgence. Lillian Hellman, played by Jane Fonda, is unable to celebrate the thrill of her life time, success as a Broadway writer, as she looks at what's going on in the world, and attempts to ease her conscious by being drawn into European resistance by her longtime friend. Jason Robards plays Dashiell Hammett, her personal success encouragement. Vanessa Redgrave is her friend Julia, the other side of her personal dilemma. Also, the sets are exquisite. The acting is top notch.
22 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-acted and directed drama but not as memorable as the infamous Oscar speech...
ElMaruecan8221 December 2021
Till now, Fred Zinnerman's "Julia" was for me that film that earned Vanessa Redgrave that very Oscar that inspired the infamous speech where the use of two specific words made the audience gasp in horror... and prompted Paddy Chayefsky to retort with the sharpness of tone he'd made a reputation of.

I'm mentioning this incident because it preceded my viewing for at least one decade and it was so prevalent in my memory that I kept looking for signs of subversions within Redgrave's character or performance... surely a role that ignited such a fire had to be polemical in its core. There had to be something about that Julia.

Well, I saw "Julia" and let me say it is a puzzling movie, quite literally in fact, the plot is structured like a jigsaw puzzle whose final picture is not just that eponymous Julia that keeps popping in Lillian's memory in well-placed flashbacks but also the source of that deep friendship. A friendship that was one encounter away from true love, one that wouldn't have been too subversive during the roaring twenties or in the pre-Nazi Vienna or Berlin.

Anyway, "Julia" could as well be titled "Julia and Lillian" and it's a shame that a film about two fascinating women couldn't allow us to reach any of them. But the film couldn't have been a failure even if it wanted to, for even the intellectual type of movie lover can't be insensible to the beautiful art-direction, a great rendition of the 30s like a sort of miniaturized version of a Lean epic and naturally, the performances.

The cast includes Jane Fonda who plays the famous writer Lillian Herman (author of "The Little Foxes"), Jason Robards is Dash Hammett, her companion (author of "The Maltese Falcon") and Vanessa Redgrave is the mysterious Julia preceded by a shadow of mystery. Maximilian Shell also makes a great impact in a role that only consists of three scenes. All these actors would be Oscar-nominated with Robards taking the other Oscar, although that win made much less noise.

It's a real shame that a film that invested so much talent could lose its way in a needlessly non-linear structure and fail to provide the very insights we expect from a movie dealing with the kind of people (I mean, writers) who expect to bring some three-dimensionality in their creations. The treatment clearly has a pretension of depth but it's very ironic that the screenplay from Alvin Sargeant, the third Oscar win of the film, is perhaps the least deserved.

Indeed, Julia, the very Julia that drives the action and gives a meaning to Lillian's constant torments, is never portrayed outside the realm of sheer idealization or victimization until it culminates with martyrdom. It's one of the few instances I can recall of a story where the subject is an object. And so we see Julia all right but not the real Julia, either from the POV of a friend who admired her deeply or during crucial moments where she follows rules.

We first see her as a young bourgeois girl (Lisa Pelikan) sharing her dreams with her friend (Susan Jones), then a medical student joining the Popular Front against the rise of fascism and later a mastermind of some secret operations, which forces her to spoil the only moment she has with Lillian, set at the present time and where both can communicate. Julia is cruelly two-dimensional, because even when we see her, we get the representation of Julia through Lillian's eyes, and the woman is never allowed to reveal the depths of her persona, why she joined the fight? What was her feelings? Her role simply shuts her down and entraps her in a range made of only two expressions: dignified resilience or resigned suffering.

The irony is that Jane Fonda, on the other hand, covers richer areas, she's selfish, ego-driven, ambitious, nervous, petty, enjoys being famous, throws a typewriter off the window out of exasperation, seeking compliments from her lover, she's so opposite to Julia that she's in fact more accessible, more real, rounded and natural... but even Fonda seems to be wasted in a role that blocks her impulses and give her no latitude to expand her characters except for that brief mission between Russia and Moscow that seems like a long build up to a climax that never happens.

That said, it's a pleasure to watch Jane Fonda and her interactions with Jason Robards are one of the film's highlights. I wonder though what prompted the Academy to make him win his second Oscar for a role that is basically the same than "All the President's Men". I know there's a lot of Oscar trivia involved in the film, which makes it all the more fitting that it's the debut of the most Oscar-nominated star ever: Meryl Streep.

Now, I said the film would please the intellectual type, I'm afraid the little shortcomings in the narrative structure might disappoint those who expect more 'punch' from a film that denounces the horrors of the Nazi regime, in other words, they might find the film boring... and as much as I didn't have trouble following it, it's true this is one of these period pieces forgotten like "Ragtime", "Tess" or "Reds".

I said it's ironic that a film about such fascinating women couldn't allow us to reach any of them, but in a way that echoes how strangely reality can work, it's also ironic that two women known for their radical views couldn't bring to the screen that very life that inhabit their roles... in fact, the film could have worked better if that "Julia" was half as interesting as the same Redgrave who made that speech.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Julia Forty Years Later
danielledecolombie20 April 2017
To rediscover Julia in 2017 is an absolute thrill. It was thrilling the first time round but, as it happens, nine times out of ten, thrills don't travel well. Here is the exception. Time, through Jane Fonda and Vanessa Redgrave has added an extra coat of guts and truth. They were magnificent then and they are magnificent now. As actresses, as women. The friendship of Lilli and Julia is a landmark of historical, artistic and human proportions. Fred Zinnemann, the director, clearly knew what he was dealing with, brilliantly. Julia also counts with the extraordinary Jason Robards as Dashiel Hammett and, my goodness, Meryl Streep! in a small but memorable part, making her film debut. I believe this is one of those rare films that will be relevant for ever.
78 out of 86 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fiction Disguised as a Spy Film
gavin69427 April 2016
At the behest of an old and dear friend, playwright Lillian Hellman (Jane Fonda) undertakes a dangerous mission to smuggle funds into Nazi Germany.

Somehow this ended up winning three awards at the Oscars: Best Supporting Actor for Jason Robards, Best Supporting Actress for Vanessa Redgrave, and Best Adapted Screenplay for Alvin Sargent's script. Must have been a slow year.

Although this is not a bad film, it suffers from being a load of baloney. The original author made up this tale to make herself look daring and brave, but in reality she had no connection to the events and was a complete fraud. If we accept he story as a story, it is pretty good, but because the film uses all the "real" names, it sort of rewrites history for the worst.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Jane Fonda's Greatest Role: Jane As Lillian Hellman
FloatingOpera723 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Julia (1977): Starring Jane Fonda, Vanessa Redgrave, Jason Robards, Maximilian Schell, Rosemary Murphy, Meryl Streep, Lisa Pelikan, Susan Jones, Cathleen Nesbitt, Hal Holbrook, Dora Doll, Elisabeth Mortensen, Mark Metcalf, Maurice Denham, Stefan Gryff, Molly Urquhart, Jacques David, Phillip Siegel, Anthony Carrick, Ann Quensberry, Jacqueline Staup, Hans Verner, Edmond Bernard, Christian De Tilliere, Francis Lemaire, Jacques Disses, Lambert Wilson, Dick Marr, Don Koll....Director Fred Zinnemann, Screenplay Alvin Sargent.

Released in 1977, audiences who had read American playwright and screenwriter Lillian Hellman's autobiographical novel "Pentimento", were thrilled to watch this tale unfold with fine performances by Jane Fonda, Vanessa Redgrave and Jason Robards. Director Fred Zinneman (From Here To Eternity, The Nun's Story) recreates a time in Lillian Hellman's life with vivid intensity and powerful emotional impact. Jane Fonda as Lillian is possibly her greatest performance. She captures the spirit of the Louisiana-born playwright quite well and Hellman herself must have been impressed. Hellman was still alive at this time (born 1905 died 1984). Among Miss Hellman's finest works include "The Children's Hour", "The Little Foxes", "The North Star", "The Dark Angel" and "Toys In The Attick" . The film follows the life of Hellman and covers areas that are well-known, such as her long-term relationship with mystery writer Dashiel Hemmett, played by Jason Robards, her professional relationship with author Dorothy Parker (portrayed by Rosemary Murphy), and her love of the city of Paris. But the film focuses on her little-known relationship with a childhood friend Julia (Vanessa Redgrave in a magnificent performance). Julia studies medicine in Vienna but World War II breaks out. Julia becomes a socialist and political activist who zealously opposes Nazism and Fascism. She goes as far as to rescue the lives of Jews and other victims of Hitler's regime. As such, she is always in mortal danger. She maintains contact with Lillian through letters and eventually asks for her help on a mission. Lillian travels to Moscow via Berlin, the heart of danger at this time. Will Lillian reunite with Julia ? Will the mission be accomplished ? Will things ever be the same now that WWII has begun ? While the film is long, bittersweet and somewhat scary in its powerful account, it's a well-written film and Jane Fonda and Vanessa Redgrave, two noted stars, do their roles justice. Look for a brief cameo by Meryl Streep, not yet a big star, as Julia's care-free friend Ann Marie. Lillian Helman is finally vindicated in this fine tribute to her as Hollywood of the late 70's was far more forgiving and liberal than the old Hollywood of the 40's and 50's which had blacklisted Hellman as communist and kept her from writing plays or film scripts. With somewhat "stern" cinematography by veteran film-maker Douglas Slocombe and haunting music by Georges Delerue, this is an emotionally charged film that will move you and stir your soul. It's a beautiful, tragic tale of two friends, full of the power of human love.
40 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
My brief review of the film
sol-7 July 2005
A fairly glossy, good-looking period film, with apt sets and costumes as one would expect, and a haunting atmosphere thanks to some excellent bits of music, the film is nevertheless jarred by the way it changes tone. It begins as a drama, but then it turns into a thriller in the second half, and does not really revert back. This leaves open the question of whether there was any point to the first half of the film at all. It does not help to understand the characters any better, and in fact they all seem rather shallow the whole time. Jane Fonda has some good moments, but she also has a tendency to go over-the-top now and again. Robards and Redgrave won Oscars for their performances, but it is hard to see why against the other nominees. The best acting moments belong to Maximilian Schell as the mysterious Mr. Johann, but Susan Jones, who plays Fonda's character as a youth, also deserves a mention. The train sequences are admittedly exciting, but the scenes that are shown before the film there are only questionably necessary. It is not a great film overall, but it is a good one.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An Intimate And Painful Portion Of Her Life
bkoganbing25 November 2009
The story of Julia is taken from Pentimento the second of three volumes of memoirs by American playwright Lillian Hellman. Hellman who was still alive at the time this film was made surely must have been flattered by what Jane Fonda and the rest of the cast did with an intimate and painful portion of her life.

Lillian Hellman was a radical and unorthodox character in her life and times. She was the first major American writer to bring a lesbian theme to the stage in The Children's Hour. What she gives us in Julia is a look at her life and how she was able to create the characters of Karen and Martha the schoolteachers from The Children's Hour.

In this story Karen and Martha are Jane Fonda as Lillian Hellman and Vanessa Redgrave as her most intimate friend Julia. Both are Jewish, but Redgrave is British and Hellman is American. Their destinies seeming to be fated for togetherness are driven apart as Julia decides to go to university in Vienna to study under Sigmund Freud.

But while Hellman struggles to create a play under the tutelage of lover and mentor Dashiell Hammett as played by Jason Robards, Jr., Julia gets herself involved in the anti-fascist activities in an Austria already preparing for Anschluss. While Hellman is visiting Julia sustains some very serious injuries during a Nazi inspired riot.

As the story continues Hellman meets great acclaim with her first major hit which turns out to be The Children's Hour, but her communications from Julia become more and more infrequent and somewhat bizarre. Then she's asked on another trip to smuggle money into the Third Reich to aid Julia and others fleeing Hitler's tyranny.

Director Fred Zinneman who was also a refugee from the Anschluss of Austria knew his subject well. He successfully transfers his memories and visions of a frightened people with good reason to be frightened. Fonda's American experience doesn't prepare her for this, but as Hellman she adapts to the environment well for her survival. Her budding celebrity no doubt helps insure her survival.

But the one you will remember is Vanessa Redgrave who won a Best Supporting Actress Oscar as Julia. The last scene of her and Fonda together at a Berlin train stop café is no doubt what won her the Oscar. It will haunt you long after you've seen the film.

Julia won two other Oscars, one for Best Screenplay adapted from another source and Best Supporting Actor for Jason Robards, Jr. as Dashiell Hammett. Sharing sex, literature, and politics wasn't enough for the Hammett/Hellman duo, Robards as Hammett knows well that he runs second as will anyone else in Fonda's life to her lost Julia. But he's secure enough to realize it and enjoy what he has.

Maximilian Schell was also up for Best Supporting Actor in a small, but vital role as an anti-Nazi German who gives cryptic guiding instructions to Fonda on her last visit to Julia. It's through him that the fright of the opposition is seen mostly. Meryl Streep made her screen debut as an upper class snob of a friend that Fonda has and Strepp has a brother in John Glover. Glover specializes in portrayals of truly hateful people on the big and small screen. He confesses a breaking a major taboo to Fonda while drunk and then snickers at her relationship with Redgrave. Jane handles him appropriately.

Julia was also up for a flock of other Oscars including Best Picture, Best Director for Fred Zinneman and Best Actress for Jane Fonda. It's a beautiful and haunting film about Lillian Hellman writing from the heart about a lost love.
30 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Part Biographical and part Fictional Drama
gpeevers16 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The story of playwright Lillian Hellman's (Jane Fonda) friendship with her fictional best friend Julia (Vanessa Redgrave) a left wing activist who opposes the rise of the Nazi's in Europe, and to a lesser extent her relationship with her lover Dashiel Hammet (Jason Robards).

The film three leads are all fine though somewhat mannered in their roles, and I wouldn't have thought Oscar worthy. In support; Maximillian Schell is good in a small role, though Hal Holbrook is not well used in a role that is against type. Further Meryl Streep appears in one of her first roles, but get almost no screen time and both Lisa Pelikan and John Glover also appear in early roles.

None of the relationships between the characters are fleshed out sufficiently. There are some nice moments between Fonda and Robards but not quite enough and the Fonda and Redgrave relationship seems one sided and lacking a real basis.

The film does build some tension on Hellman's clandestine visit to Berlin but the character is a little to awkward here to be entirely credible and the fact that many would be aware that she would continue to live a fairly long life after this time bleeds some of that tension away.

Director Fred Zinneman does an adequate job but I think the film pales in comparison to some of his other work including; High Noon, Day of the Jackal, From Here to Eternity and even The Nun's Story.

The fairly extreme political affiliations of both Hellman and Hammet aren't really covered or addressed in the film and their conversations never really touch on them. Instead we have the character of Julia (who possibly incorporated aspects from acquaintances) serving as an expression of their beliefs.

It's a fairly good movie but in retrospect it's hard to believe the film got 11 Oscar nominations including Best Picture for which neither "Saturday Night Fever" nor "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" were nominated that year. The film would win 3 Oscars.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"Lillian"
brefane24 June 2008
Muddled and pointless drama that really should have been titled Lillian. Fred Zinneman's film is beautifully edited, scored, and photographed, and was nominated for 10 Academy Awards, but it's a vapid and self important film that's missing a core. Fonda is miscast as Hellman and she has no character to play and the scenes of Hellman writing, smoking, and drinking are flat and clichéd, as are the scenes between Lillian and Dashiell Hammett. And Julia and Lillian occupy little screen time together hence the basis for their relationship must be assumed. Supporting Oscar winner Jason Robards is typically gruff and Redgrave's Julia is all luminosity. Redgrave won the Oscar for supporting actress, and her controversial acceptance speech is really the most notable thing about Julia. The centerpiece of the film really milks Lillian's smuggling money into Nazi Germany for all the cloak and dagger it's worth, and it's really the only interesting thing about Julia or Lillian.
18 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
REDGRAVE is wonderful!
MLaug2247725 August 2002
JULIA is a fine film. Fonda as Hellman is very good as is Robards as Dashell Hammett. But the real prize is the performance of Vanessa Redgrave as Julia. Though her part is small she is absolutely glowing as Julia. Her face is very radiant and she projects so much with her eyes. She is a great actress indeed.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A film not to Hellman's credit
SimonJack5 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Author and playwright Lillian Hellman surely gave us some wonderful stories and plays for stage and film in the early to middle 20th century. But, this was not one of them. Indeed, its claim to be a story of her own experience from WWII has since been shown to be untrue. Shortly after the film's release, Hellman was proved to have pirated the story from another writer. Soon, a number of other people attested to her falsehoods about several claims she had made about herself. For more on this, see any of several bios of Hellman online, including the IMDb accounts, Wikipedia and some other more detailed accounts.

It seems as though Hellman may have become too enamored with herself over time. Indeed, some more revealing historical accounts of her life have shown more intimidating times of her past. She opposed political asylum in the U.S. for some early Russian communist leaders while giving unashamed support for Joseph Stalin — even knowing of his execution of many Russians.

So, what about the film, "Julia?" The fact that Hellman did not experience this so-called chapter in her life may be why it comes across as so poorly scripted. And why the actor playing her, seems so dubious in the role. This should be apparent to anyone who knew much about Hellman and her feisty, self-assured, at times belligerent character. If Jane Fonda was playing Hellman, then Hellman didn't even get her own character right. That, or the script was written without the passion that someone who really experienced it would have known. Either way, it really showed in the choppy and abrupt changes of scenes.

The story could have been one of great intrigue, but for the distractions caused by the poor scripting and almost droll acting by Fonda. I can't imagine that a number of the silly moments of forgetfulness by Fonda would be in the script. What was Hellman thinking? To what purpose? Fonda's forgetting to leave the box of chocolates on the train, forgetting to put on the hat, and a few other such incidents of memory loss were quite glaring considering that these were covered with such explicit instructions for her. All that forgetfulness just made me focus on how little the main person (Hellman/Fonda) paid attention to her friend Julia; and how simple- minded she could be. She just didn't seem to grasp the reality of what was going on around her. Could that have been the intended portrayal of the Fonda role? Hellman writing Hellman to be such a dumb ox — I doubt it.

All of the acting was not poor. Indeed, Vanessa Redgrave was excellent as Julia. But that the film received so many other Oscar nominations, including one for Fonda as best actress, only reflects the poor quality of films from Hollywood for the year. Only a handful of movies competed for most of the major awards, and none of them were great films. Compare 1977 to most years in the previous four decades when many, many films competed in different categories, including those years when one or two huge blockbusters ran away with the bulk of awards. (Look at 1962, for instance. Nearly two dozen films got Oscar nominations, and a dozen truly great films competed for top honors.)

As I said at the start, Lillian Hellman gave us some great and enduring stories in her time. But in her later years she seemed to give way to a type of grandiosity that had her writing completely fabricated events from her life in her autobiography. Her last few years were not proud ones for this once great writer as the truth about her fabrications became widely known. It's interesting to me that in 1977, Hollywood would still put this film out with a claim to its authenticity as lived by Hellman, in the face of the public challenges that had been made. It would still have been okay as a piece of fiction or otherwise; but the poor scripting and poor acting by the main character just leaves this as a mediocre film.

My six stars are for the lone top performance by Lynn Redgrave and for the intrigue that was still able to be felt in spite of the acting distractions and script shortcomings.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Serious, splendidly done drama
arturus27 February 2006
This was one of the best pictures I had ever seen when it was first released, and after almost thirty years, I still think so, especially after watching the steady decline in quality of product that the film industry has turned out since.

Gorgeously photographed, costumed and written, with some of the finest acting on film, "Julia" succeeds in capturing the texture and truly world shattering issues of a time and place, Europe between the wars and on the brink of cataclysm. Everything about it shines, from the scenes of childhood in flashback to the suspenseful and tense train trip, I watch this film over and over waiting for one scene: the scene between Fonda and Redgrave in the Berlin restaurant. I just saw it again two hours ago and once again I was in awe of the acting, from both stars, some of the finest work of their careers, the direction of the scene and the spare, intense writing.

Whether the story itself was factual or not (Hellman might just have made it all up!) it works on so many levels that it's still worthy, and its truth or falsity just doesn't matter.
52 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Surprisingly Flimsy Story
Tin_ear15 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Lillian Hellman wrote some great, nuanced plays in her life, so it's odd her own life story is written so flatly and unevenly. While the acting is good, there is no arc or drama in the whole movie. (Spoiler) The introduction and original title of the memoir hints at that there is a chance she will "repent" and change her mind, betraying her friend or something like that...but we know she won't, or else there is no movie (it's one of those films where you know exactly how every character will play out in the first five minutes). That would have made a more interesting film, but Julia is essentially a spy-caper with a Dashiell Hammett cameo. Instead the movie builds to a dramatic point where the protagonist stumbles into an anti-climactic money-smuggling ring on a train. And the then her friend dies and never tells where her baby is.

We don't even know whether there is a baby at all or if that was just a ploy to smuggle one more kid out of Nazi Germany (which would have made a more interesting plot point: a dogmatic woman disavowing her past and social conventions, manipulating and duping her weaker friend in emotional blackmail, adopting a needy orphan) but that's clearly not how it was intended to be interpreted. It's so po-faced and morally pristine the only characters I really enjoyed were the two scumbag incestuous aristocrats played by John Glover and Meryl Streep.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fonda, Redgrave, Streep!
mrcaw1227 April 2004
Julia (1977) Starring Jane Fonda as playwright Lillian Hellman and Vanessa Redgrave (controversially winning a Best Supporting Actress Oscar) as a longtime childhood friend. Meryl makes the most of her miniscule part as an upper-class snob acquaintance of Ms. Fonda's. Basically it's a story of a friendship. Redgrave's character, born into privilege, becomes part of the Resistance movement in World War II torn Europe while Fonda fights her own political battles in America while becoming a famous playwright.

The story focuses on an episode near the end of the friends' lives, when Fonda goes to Europe to visit Redgrave, now completely consumed in underground resistance activities and (summoning up bravery of her own) smuggles in money to support the underground movement.

The movie succeeds on several levels. The cinematography, though shot in color, successfully evokes a world of muddied browns, shadows and murkiness. The screenplay, based on Hellman's own memoir is translated well, capitalizing on Hellman's unique talent for imbuing simple moments with heroic significance. The personal drama of the friendship is heightened against the intrigue and always threatening possibilities of war.

Julia provides a rare opportunity to see two female characters conducting their lives not as appendages of men, but as independent protagonists. Furthermore, social relationships, both on a personal and political level, are presented, for a change, from a woman's point of view. Though not a Streep showcase, it is a compelling movie that will haunt you.
39 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An intelligent, but overlong film
moonspinner5510 July 2005
Jane Fonda gives a tough, fierce performance as chain-smoking writer Lillian Hellman, working on her breakthrough play "The Children's Hour" while harking back on her friendship with a political-minded woman-friend who once involved her in treacherous anti-Nazi activities in the 1930s. Adapted from Hellman's short story (part of her book "Pentimento"), yet filled with arty pretensions and unrealized relationships. Jason Robards won a Supporting Oscar for his flashy performance as Hellman's lover, writer Dashiell Hammett, and Vanessa Redgrave also took a statue as the luminous friend, Julia. Still, it is Fonda's energy and amusing drive that keeps the film on track (her outbursts at the typewriter are especially memorable, and perfectly captured). The picture is handsome to a fault, but too long and occasionally inert. Look fast for Meryl Streep in her film debut. **1/2 from ****
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
the gathering storm of Nazism
lee_eisenberg11 August 2005
Jane Fonda and Vanessa Redgrave continued their streak of formidable roles with "Julia". Lillian Hellman (Jane Fonda) was childhood friends with affluent Julia (Vanessa Redgrave). Julia has since abandoned her wealth and devoted her life to fighting Fascism. She is currently helping the resistance movements in Europe. Lillian decides to bring some American currency to help Julia in her struggles. While in Europe, she can certainly see the imprint of Nazism.

This movie does a masterful job not only showing the takeover by the Nazis, but it also puts some other things in perspective. Since I saw it a few days before the US invaded Iraq, I got the feeling of a similarity in that way. Maybe the fact that someone in my dormitory was playing a somber song on the piano (it may have been the "Schindler's List" theme music) also contributed to that. But either way, the perfect direction, script, cinematography, and performances by Fonda and Redgrave, plus Jason Robards Jr as Dashiell Hammett and Maximilian Schell as Julia's friend Johann, make this a perfect movie.
33 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fine performances and directing, uneven plot
BeneCumb12 February 2014
Although the movie was nominated for 11 Oscars and ended up winning 3, there is not much mentioning of it nowadays, it is seldom on TV etc. My guess is due to the script and topic approach - since 1990ies, there have been so many strong movies about Nazi Germany, resistance to it, fate of Jews, etc, that Julia has became timeworn. The really catchy part of the movie is the smuggling train trip from Paris to Russia via Germany, the rest is so-so, often too trivial and/or insipid. At least to me as man, as the movie had strong focus on women's issues and comprehensions.

Jane Fonda as Lilian Hellman is really great, it was strange that she did not receive an Oscar for such a big and strong role; Vanessa Redgrave as Julia and Jason Robards as Dashiell Hammett (who received this award for supporting roles) were good as well, but they spent rather limited time on screen.

All in all, a good watch, but not among the greatest Oscar winners.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Friendship tested by the rise of fascism
FedRev15 February 2015
Julia is a story of friendship and courage between two women whose relationship is tested by the rise of fascism prior to World War II. The story centers around Lillian who is a struggling writer working on a play as she recalls memories of her childhood friend, Julia, who rebelled against her wealthy family to become a progressive radical. Over the years, as Julia became politically active, the friends see a lot less of each other. Lillian always keeps Julia in her thoughts, and they meet when they can, but the rise of fascism pulls them apart, but also brings them closer together. Lillian never fully understands Julia's political ideology or why she risks so much to fight for her ideals, but when she is called to aid in an effort to resist the Nazis by smuggling funds into Germany on Julia's behalf, she rises to the challenge. Julia is a charismatic figure, and despite only appearing on screen for a few minutes, Vanessa Redgrave's performance is inspiring, making us want to see more of her, just as Lillian wishes to. Jane Fonda plays Lillian in this beautifully crafted film by Fred Zinnemann about the power of friendship to help us rise above our fears and to do more than we think we are capable in the face of great danger.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
great actresses
SnoopyStyle7 January 2017
It's 1934. Lillian (Jane Fonda) is struggling to write her play while living with her mentor lover Dashiell Hammett (Jason Robards). It's a fiery relationship but her closest relationship is Julia (Vanessa Redgrave). They were brought up together in Julia's grandparents' palatial mansion. Julia became a social activist battling the rising tide of fascism in Europe. She was beaten in Vienna, hospitalized, and escaped. Lillian returns from Vienna to write a celebrated play. She visits Paris where Lillian sends Johann (Maximilian Schell) to meet her. Despite her Jewish background, she is recruited to bring Julia's money to Berlin to bribe for her colleague's freedom.

These are great actresses. The movie spends too much time with Lillian's relationship to Dashiell and her writer's block. They end up adding very little to what is truly needed for this story. This movie needs to develop her relationship with Julia. Julia is the titular character and the more fascinating one. Meryl Streep has an early minor role but it's really insignificant. It takes awhile for the movie to get interesting. It's a slow start and the women don't get consistent time together until late in the movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Minor Example of Zinnemann's Work
JamesHitchcock19 July 2014
The late Lillian Hellmann may have been a gifted writer, but it has often been alleged that her purported biography "Pentimento" is her most complete work of imaginative fiction; Mary McCarthy famously said of her that "Every word she writes is a lie, including 'and' and 'the' ". "Julia", based on a chapter of that book, was marketed as a true story, but it has been claimed that it is pure fiction and that Hellman's supposed close friend Julia never actually existed.

The film tells the story of Hellmann's alleged relationship with Julia from their childhood in the early twentieth century up until the 1930s. Julia is said to be the daughter of a wealthy American family. After studying at Oxford and the University of Vienna she becomes involved with radical left-wing politics and rejects her family's bourgeois attitudes. The catalyst for her political conversion is said to be the shelling of the working-class districts of Vienna in 1934, although the film, possibly deliberately, conflates three separate events, the Austrian Civil War of 1934, the unsuccessful attempt by the Austrian Nazis to overthrow the Austro-Fascist Dollfuss regime later the same year and the successful Nazi Anschluss of 1938. The idea that one could simultaneously be a Fascist and an opponent of Nazism (as Dollfuss and his successor Schuschnigg undoubtedly were) is probably too complex for the film's rather simplified political view; much easier to blame the assault on the Viennese working class on Hitler. The script also omits the fact that Hellmann was a committed communist and admirer of Stalin; in the film her politics are simply anti-Nazi.

Hellmann is by now a successful playwright, so celebrated that people even recognise her "when she goes out to buy mayonnaise". (An in-joke and possibly a disguised piece of product placement, playing on the well-known brand Hellman's Mayonnaise). When she is invited to a writers' conference in Moscow she is contacted by her old friend Julia, now a member of an anti-Nazi movement in Germany, who asks her to smuggle money into the country for the benefit of the cause. Despite the dangers involved in her mission, Hellmann does not hesitate to accept.

Does it matter whether the story is truth or fiction? One who thought it did was the director, Fred Zinnemann, who accepted his assignment in the belief that he was directing a true story and who implied that he would have made it in a different way had he believed it to be fiction. Of Hellmann himself he said that she was a "phony character" and that their relationship "ended in pure hatred".

My own view is that the factual accuracy of the story it tells is not always the most important thing about a film; there are, after all, plenty of good films, even great ones, which have played fast-and-loose with historical fact. "Amadeus" (to take only one example) is a wonderfully imaginative film, but I would not recommend it to anyone looking for an accurate account of the lives of Mozart and Salieri. Julia, however, has its faults even when seen as a piece of film-making rather than a piece of historical biography.

The "smuggling money into Germany" plot sounds like something from a thriller, but seen as a thriller the film is too slow-moving and lacking in tension; it would have needed someone like Hitchcock to make it exciting. As a statement about Nazism, it does not analyse the nature of Nazi tyranny in any depth. As a study of friendship it is too one-sided. It may be entitled "Julia" but it should have been called "Lillian" as there is far more emphasis on Hellmann than on her friend. Vanessa Redgrave, who plays the ostensible title role, was only nominated for a "Best Supporting Actress" Oscar (she won) whereas Jane Fonda who plays Hellmann was nominated for "Best Actress" (she lost, to Diane Keaton in "Annie Hall"). Jason Robards, who plays Hellmann's lover Dashiell Hammett, won "Best Supporting Actor".

In her controversial Oscar acceptance speech (controversial because of certain remarks she made about Zionism), Redgrave said that in this film she and her close friend Fonda had done "the best work of our lives". Fonda is certainly good, if one can overlook the fact that she looks nothing like the real Lillian Hellmann, even if this is not in my view her best film. I felt, however, that there was nothing particularly out of the ordinary about Redgrave's performance, although I will suspend my comments on the justice or otherwise of her Oscar win until I am more familiar with the performances of the other actresses who were in contention in 1977. As for Robards, I can think of at least one actor (Alec Guinness in "Star Wars") who was more deserving of the "Best Supporting Actor" award.

One thing that did impress me was the quality of the photography; there are some wonderfully evocative scenes, such as the one of Hellmann fishing from a boat on a lake which opens and closes the film, the shots of Hellmann and Hammett on the beach by their seaside home on Cape Cod, and all those trains arriving at a station in a cloud of steam or puffing through a wintry landscape. Overall, however, I feel that, despite all its Oscar nominations, "Julia" must rank as a minor example of Zinnemann's work, especially as he was responsible for such masterpieces as "High Noon", "From Here to Eternity", "The Nun's Story" and "A Man for All Seasons". 5/10
14 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed