The Left-Handed Woman (1977) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Why is this film not on video?
Randall-51 June 1999
I saw "The Left-Handed Woman" on its original release more than twenty years ago, and though I have never seen it since it continues to haunt me. The performance by Edith Clever I think is one of the most moving depictions of the solitary individual that I know. Handke perfectly realizes his own haunting story in cinematic form. I have had no luck finding the movie on video, but someday surely I shall be able to see and admire it again. A terribly neglected masterpiece.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Something was missing
Horst_In_Translation26 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Die linkshändige Frau" or "The Left-Handed Woman" is a West German German-language film from 1978, so this one will soon have its 40th anniversary. The writer here is Peter Handke who did not only come up with the novel that this is based on, but also adapted his work for the screen. Plus this is one of the rare occasions where the prolific writer also acts as director. His most known work as the man in charge. The film received a good deal of awards recognition and you could call it one of the career-defining films for lead actress Edith Clever, who plays the title character. She is supported by more known names like Bruno Ganz, Angela Winkler, Bernhard Wicki and Rüdiger Vogler and even Gérard Depardieu appears briefly. This is the story of a man who returns home from abroad, but when he does, his wife informs him that she intends to leave him, together with their son. This is fairly fine and interesting, but really not even the core plot for the first half of the film. The rest is basically about how Clever's character deals with the new complicated situation, for example how her son annoys her during her work as a single mother. I must say this film has some solid moments, but I still found it fairly dragging and way too long for its own good. It is extremely bleak and had many lengths in my opinion, which is why I am not convinced by Handke's work as a director. Just as a writer, if at all. Maybe Wenders (Handke's longtime collaborator) could have made something better out of this one. I also am not really impressed by Clever's performance and I would not call it awards- or even nomination-worthy. I guess she received lots of recognition because she is basically in every scene of the film except the very beginning and has lots of screen-time in a movie that comes close to the 2-hour mark. I would have preferred more elaboration on Ganz' and Vogler's characters for example. The way it turned out, I can not recommend the watch. I have seen many better (German) films from the 1970s. Thumbs down.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
one of the most neglected of seventies films
Ethan_Ford16 November 2007
Peter Handke was best known as a novelist,playwright and screenwriter of many of Wenders' early films(he went on to write "Wings of desire" nine years later)when he made this,his debut feature.Few novelists make the transition to director easily but this film is remarkably assured for a first effort.Edith Clever,the German actress who starred very memorably for Eric Rohmer as "The Marquise of O" plays the housewife who one day announces that she wants a divorce from her husband.No reasons or explanations are ever given;the viewer can only speculate about her state of mind as the film proceeds in a series of beautifully shot, reflective scenes photographed by Wenders' usual cameraman Robby Mueller.The static camera-work and long takes are reminiscent of Japanese master Yasujiro Ozu.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Film tries hard but doesn't quite work.
mbs27 August 2010
Honestly not much happens here. An unhappily married woman announces that she wants to leave her husband and takes her son with her...and she does! Movie then spends the rest of its running time observing her fussing and her various efforts at being comfortable living in peace with her young son. (she's a writer and her son keeps interrupting her while she's trying to write) Movie is watchable thanks to its direction and cinematography (some of which is very scenic) and the acting is fine--but there's not a whole lot of momentum here. Eventually Bruno Ganz shows back up (he being the ex husband) but he's clearly happy not being married to the woman anymore--so the film doesn't even have that little bit of tension going for it. If he's happy, and ultimately despite her concerns so is the woman--then why are we watching this???

I did like when her father visited her tho--there's a brief interlude where her father shows up and takes a walk with her through a supermarket where he encounters an actor and tells the actor that he feels that's he's not leaving traces of himself in his roles---"you're like an American actor--you just go from role to role without giving an audience any sense of who you are as a person!" he says--"I look forward to seeing you grow up from film to film in the future." Also Gerard Depardieu shows up quite briefly in one nice long shot while the woman is meeting her father at the train station wearing some ironic t-shirt like a modern day hipster-- and then doesn't speak any lines whatsoever. (the least he could've done was be the actor that the father sees in the supermarket but nope!)

I know someone who really liked this film--but honestly to me it didn't make the inner torment the woman is going through any more cinematic then it should be in order to truly be enlightening or moving to audiences ask to identify with her plight. I have to imagine a lot of this read a lot better on page then it plays on screen.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Best introduction to Handke's world
emgasulla1 October 2002
Of the many films by Peter Handke (either alone or with his partner Wim Wenders) this may be the most appealing. It is also not recommended for modern viewers accustomed to Hollywood's rhythm -it is long, slow paced and even difficult to follow sometimes. I strongly recommend viewers to read the book too, although they may not find too many additional clues there, for Handke's style is to reflect the character's actions rather than their thoughts (which, by the way, should be the perfect cinematic approach). Some people have wasted their time especulating about the woman's reasons to divorce her husband: the french essayist Gilles Lipovetsky even said that her "lack of good reasons" is a sign of modern life's emptiness. In fact, we can not say she does not have reasons: only we are not allowed to see them on the screen. One might even think that Handke himself did not care to build the woman's inner thoughts (and if he did, he sure did not share them with us). The movie, and the book, are about communication between us, or at least this is one of its possible readings. Do we really know what is on other people's mind, even people real close to us? The answer is no: we can only talk of what they tell us, or what we might hint, but how many times had we been completely wrong about somebody? The movie defies the usual assumption of an omniscient camera: the woman would not share her thoughts with the viewers, and this leaves us with a sense of discomfort. We feel compelled to find motivations that are just not there. Just the fact that the movie makes us think about it would be enough to qualify it as a masterpiece.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Voyerism does not play well in films
leftbax18 January 2022
By definition, a movie has a story to tell. It does this either by dialogue, or by sequential events.

This one has neither. It's like observing with binoculars something in the distance, and not have any clue about what's really going on. Yes, this is the purpose of the film, to force the viewer into the impossible task of reading the minds of the actors, an open ended story where any interpretation is good.

Why even use such good actors when there's no dialogue or scene that they can show their skill?

Many books were transferred to screen very successfully, but not this one. I suspect the subject is not fitting.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Questioning the interplay between inner and outer lives
philosopherjack24 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Haven't you noticed, asks the closing epigram of Peter Handke's The Left-Handed Woman, that there is space only for the one who brings space himself...? Acknowledging that the precision of the subtitles may only extend so far, it's an apt closure; the conversational tone emphasizing the film's investigative qualities, its questioning of the interplay between inner and outer lives. The choice of "himself" could be puzzling in this context, and yet the credits that follow identify Edith Clever's protagonist only as "die Frau," even though the film itself does give her a name, Marianne; her husband on the other hand is identified as "Bruno," the same name as the actor playing him, Bruno Ganz, seemingly setting out its own little puzzle regarding the relative identifiability and tangibility of the two character/actor presences. The film revolves around a German couple living in Paris (summing up the pervasive sense of dislocation) - he returns from a business trip to Finland professing his renewed joy in their relationship, to which she soon responds by instigating a split; he moves out and she goes on living in their house with their young son, gradually constructing a revised personal and social equilibrium. Marianne talks very little (her first words come so far into the film that one might have assumed her to be mute) and explains herself less, demanding that we take her on her own terms, an act of feminist sympathy which however does carry the offsetting effect of rendering her something of an abstraction (her relationship with her main female friend Franziska is also one of few words, although provides a key moment of validation when, after earlier flailing to understand Marianne's choices, Franziska finally allows that "now even I want to be alone"). But it's a satisfying film overall, with numerous secondary mysteries including the brief presence of Gerard Depardieu, billed as "Mann mit dem T-shirt," which indeed sums up his contribution exactly.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed