Xue hai tang lang chou (1977) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
For 'fu fans only
winner5518 January 2009
There's nothing about Shaolin here; tiger fist is used once, very briefly, in the whole movie. And no one uses mantis fist - although there is a giant mantis lurking about here....

Strange hybrid of standard '70s chop-socky and cheap monster movie. Basically for kung fu fans only. Being one, I do find it entertaining, but it is silly as all get out. Feminists could have a field day with it, though, as it is ambivalent about the abuse of women, and in a pretty serious way - one of the female characters undergoes repeated abuse, but she is a monster, after all.

Dean Shek turns in a surprisingly strong performance as the main villain, a rare role for him. The rest of the cast are competent, though not much more. The pacing is very good for this sort of film, and the visuals are fairly professional.

And the fight scenes are actually pretty good, just don't expect any Shaolin animal styles. It's a notch or two above the old "swinging arms boxing style, but hardly a study of real martial arts skills.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A little bit weird
zensurfer-3157819 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
At first I thought there was some weird problem with continuity, but the reveal is at the end of the movie, that's when it makes sense There is plenty of action, a bit of romance. Unfortunately there are 3 rape scenes and they are important plot points. Also English dialogue only and it is a bit better than most, but still they say some rather odd things. It's OK for fans but anyone else is unlikely to enjoy this.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Odd mix of kung fu and monster flick
Leofwine_draca1 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
MANTIS FISTS AND TIGER CLAWS OF SHAOLIN is an odd mix of low-rent kung fu film and old-fashioned monster movie. Perhaps the film-makers were inspired by Shaw's OILY MANIAC, although the monster in this film is more old-fashioned and reminded me of the costume in THE FLY, although in this film it's a woman who turns into a giant praying mantis.

The schlocky nature of the production is more than apparent in the low budget and general cheapness of the setting and costumes. The plot is slightly repetitive and seems to focus on the abuse of women a lot, which sometimes makes for off-colour viewing. Into the plot is thrown your standard young hero, here played by John Cheung without much in the way of colour or characterisation. The action is plentiful and long-time supporting star Dean Shek gets a main villain role for a change, but it's only at the climax that things become as fun as they should be. The film is only for fans of tacky monster flicks and cheap kung fu madness.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Awkward mix of chopsocky and sci-fi
lotekguy-11 March 2022
As the villain, Dean Shek turns in the only performance that isn't bland or annoyingly overplayed. No one else could find that thespian sweet spot. Several fight scenes are well-staged, with minimal wire work. The whole mantis-related action is more campy than compelling, making no sense until a piece of exposition drops on near the end. That explanation makes Spiderman's radioactive arachnid origin story seem plausible. Even so, it's not the worst you can find in the genre.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed