The Kidnapping of the President (1980) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Okay thriller
mhorg20184 July 2018
Starring William Shatner as a Secret Service agent, the President is successfully kidnapped and the search for him and the kidnappers is on. A decent film, far better than Vantage Point which had a similar idea behind it, the acting and pacing are decent as is the ending. Worth seeing if it were ever on.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A reasonably good Canadian political thriller
Red-Barracuda15 February 2016
Latin American terrorists abduct the President of the United States while he is on a state trip in Toronto. The Secret Service have to devise a plan to get him back alive.

This Canadian political thriller features Captain Kirk - I mean William Shatner - in a starring role as the head of the American Secret Service. It's always kind of fun watching him in contemporary roles and in this one he even gets to utter an f-bomb which was a bonus. He's pretty good value here and the main reason I am guessing anyone would actively seek this one out. Starring alongside him is one of those reliable 70's stalwarts, Hal Holbrook, who gets to play the President. The film itself really starts out pretty well and by the half-way point it has set in motion a pretty intriguing scenario. It would only be fair to say though that in the second half it kind of peters out a bit and the varied action and events of the set-up culminate with a situation that can best be described as a man in a van. Still, it ultimately is decent enough fare and the Toronto setting I quite liked. It certainly had the potential to be better though.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It looks like one of those films when the canadians where learning how to make them
mm-3929 August 2002
When the government was helping create a film industry here in Canada, it followed this pattern b film with a named actor. This time the name actor is William Shatner, and the b action film is about terrorist grabbing the president. Unbelievable at the time, but after 9/11 James Bond plots become more believable every week. It is entertaining, and I like Shatner in it, I forgotten abit of the ending. Entertaining, but a B film. 5/10
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An explosive action film!
GC-99 July 1999
Warning: Spoilers
This is a great flick. Full of explosive action, it's the kind of flick you never heard of, you watch it, and you wish you had heard of it sooner. Shatner is ultra cool as he plays the head of the FBI. There are plenty of great explosions, tons of action and a pretty tense storyline. The end is a bit predictable, but still leaves you cheering. Hal Holbrook plays perhaps the most believable president in film history. Most film presidents in this situation are either a wimp or a hothead jerk. Holbrook walks the line in between gracefully. Obviously the story revolves around a president getting kidnapped. The Kidnapping itself is a bit implausible. Worst of all Shatner wimps out and basically hands the President over to the thugs. But do not worry, he more than makes up for it later when he tosses around a kidnapper and the 'F word' all in the same scene. Ya gotta love the guy.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
An okay thriller (at best) which, at times, makes very little sense.
planktonrules6 January 2024
The notion that a terrorist could kidnap the President of the United States while he's standing in a crowd shaking hands sure seems ludicrous. And, it's also ludicrous to imagine the Canadian government doing such an awful job protecting the man. You must look past all this in order to enjoy the movie....or at least to not discount it. Additionally, you must also accept that the terrorists could shoot a gas station and make it explode...again and again and only with one shot! And, you must accept that the main terrorist's confederate pulls out the detonator from her pocket and holds it...while a crowd is standing around her...even though she is supposed to stay hidden. And, when an insane man wanders into the middle of this 'situation', nothing is done to stop him until the last possible second. And, a dedicated terrorist changes her mind at the last second. And, finally, you must accept that pretty much everyone in the film, with the exception of the CIA agent (William Shatner), is stupid.

It is a shame, really, as Shatner is very good here and the film has some other excellent actors, such as Hal Holbrook, Van Johnson and Ava Gardner (who does a nice Lady MacBeth impersonation). But the basic premise just doesn't make much sense. For a similar but far more intelligent story, try watching the original "Day of the Jackal". It covers similar ground but does it much more intelligently and believably. Overall, watchable but really, really, REALLY farfetched.

By the way, gas stations do NOT blow up like this. If they did, they'd be blowing up all the time and no one would ever consider driving a gas powered car!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Captain Kirk Saves the President
momsatrekkie16 February 2007
I really wanted to hate this movie. William Shatner has played in some real turkeys, 'Big Bad Mama' being a prime example. However, there was something about this film that I really liked. Maybe it was WS looking all natty and noble in his navy blue suit and trench coat. Or the idea of Van Johnson as the vice president, married to Ava Gardner -- oh, what a casting fiasco that was! Or Hal Holbrook being presidential yet once again. Or the fact that this was a Canadian film actually shot on location in Toronto (starring my favorite guy from north-of-the-border). The story wasn't too bad, the acting wasn't too horrible. And did I mention how cute Shatner looked?
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A ho-hum affair, with Shatner in the leading role.
thompson6220828 February 2004
This movie looked like it was rushed to release for some reason. Definitely not a well made movie. So unbelievable. The scenes where the President (Holbrook) were downtown and walking among the people were a farce. There would not be a chance for the common folk to be within 30 yards of the President in that situation in real life. If it wasn't for the blood and profanity, this was shot like a TV movie. It could have been decent if it was done differently. Holbrook's (President) talents were never realized in this movie. Shatner's acting is okay. The production values in this movie leave a lot to be desired. Overall, I think most people would be better off not wasting time to watch this affair.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not as bad as I think it is...
jimcancook8 November 2023
...but not as good as it thinks it is. It's an interesting concept, the American president is kidnapped, locked in an armored truck and held for ransom. The script has plot holes you could drive an armored truck through and logical non-sequiturs abound.

The soundtrack is annoying as heck. There's some music mixed in there someplace but it's frequently lost behind a wall of chirpy synthesizer noises.

And the pacing is sluggish. It's like being in grade school and receiving an assignment to write an essay of some arbitrary length, say 500 words, so you just shovel padding words into the essay until you reached the mandated length. That's how the script feels - padded and bloated.

The cast is OK-ish. Hal Holbrook is fine as the presidential hostage but he's not asked to do much more than sit in a truck. It's always a pleasure to see Van Johnson, who starred in some of my favorite childhood movies - Brigadoon and The Pied Piper of Hamlin - and Ava Gardner.

What to say about Shatner that hasn't been written countless times already? I'm not really sure we should call what he does "acting". He just is Shatner just as he is just Kirk and just every other character he's ever portrayed. He's always the same. Like Robert Morley or Jerry Lewis. Unchanging. Constant. The most disconcerting aspect of his participation is most actors sharing a scene with him unconsciously act like him.

There are worse ways to spend a couple of hours but I know there are better ways as well.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Freeze or I'll shoot
nogodnomasters25 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
President Hal Holbrook fashioned after JFK is kidnapped by Roberto (Miguel Fernandes) a Che Guevara type who wasn't really killed by the CIA. The kidnapping takes place in Toronto and doesn't go any farther than a rigged van. Only William Shatner can save the President as VP Van Johnson struggles to give him complete control. Ava Gardner rounds out the A listers.

In spite of all the stars, like the van, the film went nowhere. It was one for the era and doesn't stand the test of time.

On multi-packs Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A solid and engrossing thriller
Woodyanders4 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Crazed and ruthless South American revolutionary Roberto Assanti (excellently played with fierce intensity by Miguel Fernandez) abducts folksy American President Adam Scott (a typically fine performance by Hal Holbrook) and holds him hostage in an armored truck that's wired with explosives for a hundred million dollar ransom. It's up to hard-nosed secret agent Jerry O'Connor (the almighty William Shatner in peak rugged form) to rescue the president before things get too out of hand. Director George Mendeluk, working from a tight and absorbing script by Richard Murphy, relates the gripping story at a steady pace and builds a sizable amount of tension. The good acting from a bang-up cast constitutes as a major asset: the usually hammy Shatner shows some restraint for once, Holbrook brings a winning blend of wry humor and amiable dignity to his juicy role as chief executive, and Elizabeth Sheperd adds some class as the loyal, concerned first lady Joan Scott, plus there are nice supporting turns by Van Johnson as wishy-washy vice president Ethan Richards, Ava Gardner as Ethan's bitchy, overbearing wife Beth, Cindy Girling as Assanti's faithful confederate Linda Steiner, Maury Chaykin as bumbling terrorist Harvey Cannon, Michael J. Reynolds as ramrod Canadian police chief MacKenzie, and Gary Reineke as smarmy jerk CIA agent Deitrich. Mike Molloy's slick cinematography makes inspired occasional use of hand-held camera-work and gives the picture an attractive glossy work. Paul Zaza's shivery, rousing score further enhances the suspense and offers a few nifty variations on "Hail to the Chief." A neat little flick.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Some Security
bkoganbing24 October 2012
At the very least The Kidnapping Of The President should discourage Barack Obama or Mitt Romney against foreign travel. Even in a country like Canada with close cooperation between governments, there's still a turf war over security.

And some security President Hal Holbrook had. A Che Guevara wannabe Miguel Fernandes wires himself with explosives and handcuffs himself to Holbrook while he's visiting Toronto. Great crowd control from the RCMP. He demands one hundred million dollars in diamonds or he and a confederate who lock Holbrook in an armored vehicle will blow it up.

There are a couple of side issues in this film. Fernandes has the sister of a former comrade whom he killed convinced that it was those no good Yankee capitalists that did Cindy Girling's sister. Secondly President Holbrook before leaving for Toronto confronts Vice President Van Johnson about some indiscretions that were never fully explained and wants him off the ticket. Now Johnson is the guy who is making the command decisions from the White House about the ransom money and of course Holbrook's life.

William Shatner is the Secret Service agent in charge and he does one colossal breach of stupidity during the crisis that I'm still reeling over. I can't say what it is, but no Secret Service agent would do it or for that matter any law enforcement person.

The Kidnapping Of The President is a rather mediocre product from Canada and I'd skip it.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good action pic
lor_26 December 2022
My original review written in August 1980 after a press screening in Manhattan: A fine action-suspense film shot last winter in Canada, "The Kidnapping of the President" has good topical prospects in this presidential campaign year. Lack of b.o.-exploitable names in the familiar cast should be a stumbling block, however.

Functional script by Richard Murphy from Charles Templeton's novel has Third World terrorists devising a plot to bring America to its knees by kidnapping the president. Hot issue of whether anyone should accede to terrorists' demands is pic's central theme.

After an unpromising, needlessly bloody opening set in South America, film settles down to gripping tale of terrorists led by chilling psychotic Miguel Fernandes, snatching president Hal Holbrook, who is wading through a crowd in downtown Toronto. Handcuffing himself to Holbrook, Fernandes believably makes off with his hostage by threatening to detonate explosives strapped to his vest. Plausibility of this well-directed staging drives home the fact that any politician routinely risks death in public appearances from some deranged person willing to forfeit his own life in the bargain.

Storing the prexy in a booby-trapped security truck, Fernandes holds up the U. S. government for $100,000,000 ransom. Secret Service head William Shatner, vying with the CIA for jurisdiction authority, is faced with the tough decision. Excellent last-reel pacing leads to suspenseful resolution.

Key subplot involves veep Van Johnson also under pressure. First faced with a "Billygate"-type bribery scandal and secondly ambivalent about saving Holbrook, as wife Ava Gardner eggs him on to take a stand.

After the fiasco of his first feature "Stone Cold Dead", director George Mendeluk has come back with a solid action film, which wisely doesn't hide its Canadian origins. Murphy's script marks a welcome return to features by the screenwriter of "Boomerang", "Panic in the Streets" and "Compulsion". Mike Molloy's budget-stretching photography in the oval office set and on Toronto locations is outstanding.

Shatner and Holbrook are effective in their central roles, but the film's real star is Fernandes, creating a spell-binding anti-hero as the lead terrorist. Elizabeth Shepherd is quite affecting in her small role as the First Lady. Guestars Van Johnson and Ava Gardner form an attractive couple as veep and wife in their first featured teaming in 35 years, since "Three Men in White".
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Pardon, sorry.
BandSAboutMovies22 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I love my wife so much. I mean, Hal Holbrook is her idea of a crush. So is Gerald McRaney. In fact, so is pretty much anyone that dated the Designing Women. That means that she actually sat and watched this movie, just to see Hal play the President who gets involved in, well, a kidnapping.

At least he has Secret Service agent Jerry O'Connor (William Shatner) - the Canadian side of this American/Canadian production, one imagines - to save his life.

For some reason, this movie reunites two Golden Age MGM stars, as Ava Gardner and Van Johnson - who were in 3 Men in White and Two Girls and a Sailor together - play the Vice President and his Second Lady. As for the First Lady, she's played by Elizabeth Shepherd from Tomb of Ligeia.

Director George Mendeluk went on to make Doin' Time, a movie I've been trying to find for a long time, and Meatballs III, which is the one where Sally Kellerman plays porn star Roxy Doujor. Strangely, Maury Chaykin is in that movie as well.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed