Firebird 2015 AD (1981) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
There's no gas or gusto to be found in this rusty clunker of a futuristic 80's sci-fi dud
Woodyanders27 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A severe gas shortage in the near future forces the government to ban the use of automobiles altogether and make the act of driving one a punishable capitol offense. However, a feisty pocket of rebellious gear-jamming metalhead race car enthusiasts called "burners" obstinately refuse to knuckle under Uncle Sam's oppressive reign, hording what little precious gas is left and happily tearin' their souped-up cars across the desolate desert terrain. Crusty ace driver Red (the always exuberant Darren McGavin, carrying on with greater flair and verve than the sub-par material deserves) and rascally fellow old-timer Indie (the solid George Touliatos) are two such guys, whooping it up as they constantly elude getting nabbed by a band of hard-nosed police officers who are very eager to nail their annoyingly evasive hides.

While the premise -- basically a science fiction version of a Burt Reynolds-style good ol' boy outrunning the pigs car chase romp -- has promise, it's fatally ruined by David M. Robertson's limp'n'lifeless (non)direction and a paltry, insufficiently thought-out bare-bones script. Moreover, the futuristic setting is depicted with a critical lack of conviction: there are no special effects to speak of, the cars look plain and antiquated, and the spartan costume designs are simply pathetic. Worse yet, the fuzzball baddies led by a sleepwalking Doug McClure are hopelessly colorless and nonthreatening; only a murderously crazed Native American nutcase trooper (outrageously overplayed by Alex Diakun) radiates any necessary sense of genuine menace. The redneck protagonists are equally insipid and unprepossessing; the picture's already slack pace screeches to a dead halt during the excruciatingly blah romantic courtship scenes between Red's wimpy estranged son Cameron (the gratingly whiny Robert Charles Wisden) and Indie's fiery foxy daughter Jill (vivaciously essayed by cute brunette hottie Mary Beth Rubens). But the movie's grossest, most egregious and unforgivable blunders have got to be the copious, but poorly staged and thus unexciting car race sequences and a gruelingly tedious surplus of hideously banal dialogue (sample line: "Keep your pedal down and your sunny side up"). So, despite some good acting and nice photography, this worthless rusty clunker overall sadly remains in teeth-gnashing neutral from the dreary start right on down to the spiritless finish.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Awesome movie...with a caveat
docmarvy21 April 2005
Well... This was an awesome movie when I first saw it. Unfortunately that was when I was six years old. So, if you're a six year old looking for a taught sci-fi thriller then this is your movie. If you are an adult looking for a weird reverse-jingoistic slow paced film with a budget that hovers somewhere in the low hundreds then this is your film. This movie is easily categorized as being hard to find for a reason. And despite all this, I want to see it again. On the upside it has a relatively decent quality cast, most of which appear to be mortified by having to take part. And as another poster mentioned, the batcave-style barn is pretty neat regardless.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Iconic muscle car as a symbol of a fake oil crisis, may presage things to come
rander-8812323 March 2021
The film concerns a clean-cut teen intrigued by an older man who happens to own an outlawed personal car which he's stored in a barn. The plot of this is in-line with other crisis movies of the time like "Americathon" which reflected the belief that the structure of America was crumbling and authoritarians would take-over. There were dozens, if not hundreds of apocalyptic or semi-apocalyptic movies like it, culminating with the magnificent "Mad Max." Then, the inspiration was President Jimmy Carter's oil-crisis of 1979 and the ridiculous idea of "peak oil," while today it ties in with attempts to control private car ownership/usage to curtail CO2 emissions. However, the result is the same, control by an elite for whom the rules don't apply. The movie unfortunately couldn't make much of a statement back then with a draggy script, a frighteningly bad song accompaniment and NO budget. The only thing it had going for it was Darren McGavin and the car. Today, a similar story might be based around noted author Michael Cricton's book, "State of Fear" which deals with the climate "crisis." One of the few Crichton books not make into a movie by Hollywood.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Not-So Fast and the Furiously Boring
Coventry21 December 2009
I never heard about this obscure piece of apocalyptic Sci-Fi trash before, until I watched a few clips and fragments in a documentary called "The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made", and it instantly looked like something worth checking out. Well, just to safe you a lot of time and trouble: "Firebird 2015" is definitely NOT something that is worth checking out! Quite the contrary, it's a terrible film. Not so much because it says so in the aforementioned documentary but merely because it doesn't make a lick of sense and everything about it just plain stupid. In the year 2015, it's prohibited by order of the US Government to drive around in any type of oil-consuming vehicle. To supervise whether or not all citizens obey this unpopular law, the government founded the Department of Vehicular Control, who naturally cruise around on oil-consuming motorcycles. Their job is to hunt down the so-called "Burners", which is a common term for elderly guys living in the desert and racing around in Firebirds that use up copious gallons of gasoline. See, this could have been the plot of a potentially fantastic post- apocalyptic adventure in the vein of "Mad Max", but instead it became a really tedious, incoherent, unmemorable and extremely pointless Canadian exploitation effort. The film is a big fat piece of nothing, with chases that are lame and car stunts that are embarrassing. It even becomes worse when the script fully begins to focus on the developing love-story between the Burners' son and daughter instead of on the rebellion against the system. The portrayal of the year 2015 is weak and cheap- looking. If you seek thrills and exhilarating vehicle action, you better stick to the original road movie "Mad Max" or one of the numerous wacky (Italian) rip-offs, like "The Atlantis Interceptors", "The New Barbarians" and "Survival Zone".
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really, Really, I mean Really BAD!
radioriot28 October 2005
First, I got this movie free from a friend who was going to throw it away... I should have let him! If somebody offers you a free movie.... don't take it! This movie is so bad on so many levels. I really like Darrin McGavin, but even he couldn't save this garbage. It's not even funny, it is a crime! There seems to be a goof in every scene. My favorite goof is when the guy is being chased by the cops on mopeds (Ilove cops on mopeds) and in one scene he isn't wearing a helmet and the next he is! Or when 4 cops shoot high powered rifles from point blank range and miss about 100 times! And then get mad at the other cop who kills the perp with a missile. What were they trying to do... wound him? They couldn't even shoot out his tires! And since the "burners" drove on the roads... maybe the cops should have staked out the ROADS! And why are there roads if there are no cars? I love "bad" futuristic movies like "A Boy and his Dog" and "Death Race 2000" and now they seem like "Gone with the Wind" compared to this crap.

I'm sure the biggest item on their budget was the $900 for the used Mustang II to blow up. I also love the cops of the future living in canvas tents in the desert and having no two way radio contact with the rest of the world.

Did I mention just how bad this movie is???? No I can't use those words here...hehehehe! Free movies are never free... there is always a price to pay. My price... there's 90 minutes of my life I'll never get back! One last thing... why does Darrin McGavin's son in the movie have an English accent???? WHY???????????
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Firebird 2015 A.D. - More like FireBORED 2015 A.D.
atomicpunk4027 November 2016
Okay, I AM writing this review in 2016, the year AFTER the movie takes place - now the past. Oh to hell with it, lets just say the middle of the 2010s so that makes my review take place in the time period the movie takes place. Now with that out of my system lets continue.

Take this scenario. In the mid 2010s gasoline is in very short supply and what is left is drastically expensive. As a result all gas burning vehicles have been banned and this has had a terrible effect on the U. S. economy. But lo and behold a group of people see through this. There's plenty of gasoline to be had they say, the U. S. government is just hogging it all for itself and this group is determined to see to it that the ban is lifted and the fuel is released, and those behind it are brought to justice for the harm it has done. In the meantime the group's favorite hobby is riding their cars around to defy the ban. To keep them in line (and to impose the ban) the government has sent special police forces out to stop this group of rebels - known as "burners" - with whatever means necessary. However nothing is going to stop these "burners" from their mission. But there are those who don't want the ban lifted, mainly the special police forces because if the ban goes, they are out of a job. So its the burners (the heroes)versus the corrupt special police (the villains) and only one side is going to win.

Now that sounds great doesn't it? And if someone else besides David Robertson had directed it, then maybe we would have had a great sci-fi movie. But he did and therefore we don't. Instead Firebird 2015 A. D. is about a bunch of people whether, it is the burners or the special police, bitching about how life is unfair in these hard times while driving around through... the desert. No cities, small towns, suburbs, or abandoned amusement parks. Just lots of empty desert landscape and nothing more. After all it worked for Wile E. Coyote didn't it? Well it doesn't work here because it only adds to the slowness that permeates this movie.

The plot, as it goes, is about Red, a leader of the burners (played by Darrin McGavin) joining forces with his long lost son (Robert Wisden) who has arrived at Red's home (a pit stop for burners as Red has his own gasoline supply) where they plan on reaching Washington D. C. so they can defeat the gas ban. Meanwhile a group of the special police (led by Doug McClure) have set up a camp near Red's compound with the hopes of stopping him. In the meantime McGavin's son falls in love with the daughter of another burner played by Mary Beth Ruebens. And that's all there is! No juicy twists or memorable quotes or set pieces to get into here. Zip! Now if this film was a rip-snorting chase movie being something like Mad Max 2 - The Road Warrior meets Smokey And The Bandit used with the above mentioned scenario then maybe we would have a real exciting flick. But nooooooo! What we get is people bemoaning about the sad happenings in their lives while constantly mumbling of how they want to defeat the other team. And all this while racing their gas wasting cars and motorcycles around what seems like the same 1 1/2 mile stretch of desert over and over again.

Now the acting. Marc McClure, always a good actor, feels wasted as the movie's heavy. He often looks like he rather be starring in a more challenging role, like maybe the lead in a softcore porno flick than in this thing. As for Rubens, she is a pretty girl, but what does she really do? And Darren McGavin? Well he just acts like Darrin McGavin.

But what's worst about this movie is the setting. Made in 1982, this was supposed to look at the distant future year of 2015. Instead it just looks like 1982. My point is this, if your going to make a movie about the future MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THE FUTURE! This movie looks about as futuristic as Meet Me In St Louis starring Judy Garland looked futuristic. There is nothing here - outside of the police uniforms and they don't count much - that makes this movie feel like things to come. I guess the makers of Firebird 2015 A. D. think by saying that this story is in the future but not showing anything futuristic was a decent idea. Why? I don't know. Maybe they thought they would get some futuristic details wrong and they didn't want that, so they decided to not show any (hey, ALL sci-fi movies about the future get some details wrong). Or maybe they didn't have the budget (Stanley Kubrick had a tiny budget when he made "A Clockwork Orange" and look what he did!). Whatever the excuse was this is one of the top reasons this movie fall flat on it's butt. We want to SEE the future and FEEL it, not just be suggested of it and little else.

A boring sci-fi movie that doesn't feel like a sci-fi movie at all. Well at least Darrin McGavin recovered from this wreck. His next role was that of Ralphie's father in "A Christmas Story" - and he had the best role of his career.

My Rating (from Excellent to Poor) - Pretty Bad. Just stick to the Mad Max movies instead. Or better yet the original Death Race 2000.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of life to even watch
morten-7696227 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I am not someone who usually puts in bad reviews unless something is so bad that a bad review is really needed, and this is one of those cases.

Especially when it had so much potential to be a good movie, it literally had every possible chance to be an awesome post-apocalyptic Mad Max style movie, but it just failed all of that in every possible way that it is possible to fail in.

Let me explain....

So the story is that the US government has outlawed gasoline burning vehicles , and "Rebels" (Called Burners) are still driving gasoline powered cars in the desert, so the government has deployed a police force that uses gasoline powered motorcycles to chase hunt these Rebels.

See what I mean, sounds like something with great potential, right?

Well, lets go over what the movie actually is...

First of all, it is categorised as a SCI-Fi Action movie....and it is not..period.

Other than taking place in the "Future" of 2015, there's nothing remotely scifi about this movie. the whole movie takes place in a desert with 80s motorbikes chasing 70s / 80s cars, even the weapons used in the movie are all regular M16s and other standard weapons for the early 80s.

Anyway, but then there's the actual storyline in the movie....the "Burners" seem to drive illegally all to deliver a carburetor....yeah seriously...but okay, fair enough in this set gasoline car parts might scarce and can have a significant value to the right buyer, so we will let this one go.

But on top of this they also seem to bet each other to drive around in the patrolled desert where they are getting shot at by the "Special police force" deployed to hunt them down...all which seem to be just for fun...

But then there's this "Special police force"....their police station is a tent, and for some reason there's one of them whos a native American guy who does all sorts of weird stuff almost like he is on drugs, and there's even one scene where one of them shoots at the other ones head while that person is approaching on a motorcycle ....all just for fun.

....like picture two police officers shooting at each other with live rounds "Just for fun"?

...Okay and then there's this "Love story" between the son of one of the Burners and some burner chick.

yeah, it's all just one big mess...and it just feels like everything is fun and jokes to them, none of them seems to be serious about their what's going on.

And then there's the acting, it's all most like none of the actors even understands their own roles or the story of the movie, it's kind of hard to describe if you haven't seen the movie. But every dialogue between the actors sounds scripted and they it's almost like they are being told what to do as they are being filmed, so you see a lot of scenes where they have a look in their face like they don't even know what the next scene will be, I am not even exaggerating on this.

But even the action in the movie, are so poorly done and all looks so staged. There's one scene where the native American police officer guy; shoots at a crashed mustang with a grenade launcher, and the guy taking cover behind the car doesn't really seem to be bothered by the grenades exploding right next to him, on top of this the native American officer is standing upright and yelling in the complete open while being shot at being shot at by the guy hiding behind the car, all of this really just makes the whole scene feel like it's just a bunch of random scenes they cut and pasted together.And it's the same in other scenes where the they are trying to block the road and shooting at the cars trying to get by.

All of which makes the action scenes really confusing to watch.

Again, it's literally everything they had the chance to do right, they did wrong.

Honestly, don't even bother watching this movie, it is not even entertaining or even so bad that it is "Fun to watch"...there's literally nothing going for this movie at all. it just leaves you with the feeling of just being annoyed that you even bothered to watch it in the first place.

It really should never have been made.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
oh gee, it's The Dukes of Hazzard meets 1984
darrylb50031 May 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I really hate sci-fi movies that are supposed to go where no one has gone before--to coin a phrase--but this one's still waiting for clearance to take off from the launching pad. And it never does take off.

Oh, I guess it DOES take off, in a way, because it's about cars, or rather, as the intro shows, the president of the United States has shut down all the gas pumps in the land (and the bland music playing is a clue as to how the movie's going to be). And you thought it was bad when your car is being repaired for just a day!

Of course, some idiots drive their vehicles anyway, known as "burners", which is what the filmmakers should have done with this movie. But instead of doing something useful with their cars--like maybe running over the person who wrote this garbage--all they do is race each other, and then complain how they don't get any "freedom", yet they're treating their autos even worse than The Dukes of Hazzard ever did. (And this is where the sci-fi premise ends, losing it's promise of being a cross between The Road Warrior and the tv movie The Day After, as it sounded in the Tv Guide description when I saw it.)

**** POSSIBLE SPOILERS, but chances are you'll never see this movie anyway, or you SHOULDN'T, so why should you care? ****

Just when you thought the most nerve-wracking thing in the world is having a cop follow you, the law here, known as the DVC, shoot at the burners, and yet they never hit anyone. Oh wait, in one scene they DID shatter someone's windshield, but then in the next second the windshield had only one bullet hole in it. Duh.

This is one of the several dumb parts in the movie--not to mention the dialog--and the fact that the scenery never changes, EVER. At least in something like Psycho, the house is cool, but after seeing desert for even twenty minutes is enough to drive anyone crazy. Oh, I'm sorry, that's a bad pun ("DRIVE anyone crazy"), but at least that pun is better than the film, except for the car mechanic Jill, who's real cute.

Another dumb part is when the DVC is shooting at one person, but he keeps on driving around in circles, and then he has the nerve to get on his cb for help, saying "these guys are crazy!" But YOU'RE the one who's driving in circles, making yourself easier to shoot at! Oh wait, there IS a difference between "crazy" and then being just downright "stupid".

So, is there ANYTHING cool at all with this blah film, besides it ending eventually? Yes: the owner of the firebird stores it in a pretty neat barn that opens up, sort of like the Batcave. However, this detracted from the movie too, because during the ho-hum race scenes, I kept on expecting Batman himself to drive by, flipping everyone the finger.

"We have ourselves a legal weapon" is a really inspiring line, which I hope, after reading this, inspires you to go rent one of the Lethal Weapon movies instead, which are a million times better than this (probably, which I haven't seen them all, but I doubt I'm wrong). Trust me.

The cars aren't even much to look at, either, so go for a drive instead and/or test watch something better. (In other words, don't be a "burner".)
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty bad, all right...
Patsy-920 December 2001
Mind you, it does sport some fine Alberta Badlands scenery. Still, I wonder why the creators of this film overlooked a shining opportunity for an approximation of wit. In the fascist America of 14 years hence, private use of petroleum is not allowed. Who enforces this? Why, the DVC, the Department of Vehicle Control, represented by the surly chief, a plainly psychotic lackey, the woman who's secretly sympathetic to the rebels and a couple of other nondescript guys. Did nobody think that instead of the DVC, it should be have been... the DMV?

Ponder that, if you're ever bored enough to watch this.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Borrrrrrrring...
McCrackan28 March 2007
I love Darren McGavin, but I couldn't make it past the first twenty minutes of this film--and that included a lot of fast-forwarding past the tedious driving scenes. Boring premise, cheesy dialog, and pacing that made me rather watch my clock's hour hand move. And come on--if the hero is going to restore some classic automobile, why would he ever waste his time and effort on a crappy Firebird?!

I literally threw away the videotape when I was done. Lucky for me that it was a gift from a friend (who also saw no reason to hang on to it). If you're looking for a silly high-speed movie, watch Smokey and the Bandit or any Steve McQueen movie. There's no reason to waste time with this drek.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
We're ridin' for our freedom!
JohnSeal1 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Well, what can one say about Firebird 2015 AD? Viewed as science fiction, it is wholly inadequate. Other than the early establishing shots of shuttered gas stations ('closed by order of the President'), there is nothing remotely futuristic or fantastic about the film. Viewed as a fast car movie, it's hardly any better--the driving scenes are very old fashioned and certainly offer next to nothing in automotive thrills. Which leaves us with the cast to consider: poor old Darren McGavin gives it his best shot, but Doug McClure doesn't even bother to phone in his performance--he submits it by Morse code. Add in the awful theme song and bad incidental music, and what you have is a boring piece of cinematic junk that offers next to no entertainment value and is insufficiently cheesy for fans of Le Bad Cinema. Absolutely, positively not worth the 90 minutes of your life it will cost you.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beyond awesome
rsmith050627 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is very underrated and is quite frankly, one of the most interesting Sci-fi films out there. It brings something new and original to the table and doesn't have all the clichés that other films that take place in the future have. It has cars, guns, explosions, and Darren Mcgavin. This might actually be the best 1980s film I've ever seen, and probably the best film on the worst list. Firebird 2015 has a lot of decent actors, a simple but creative storyline, and freaking' cars! This is a movie that should definitely be watched at least once. I think that the soundtrack id pretty awesome as well. The song during the racing scene and the climax was beyond epic in every way known to man. So was the song that played at the beginning of the movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Concept Is Great, But The Execution Was Poor At Times.
BanditTA794 October 2021
I came across this movie by accident on a Pontiac Firebird group on Facebook and I thought I'd check this flick out. Now the concept of the movie revolves around the government banning oil due to a supposed shortage, which in the film has a U. S senator proposing a bill to bring it back. In the mean time, a group of car drivers called burners use muscle cars as the ultimate form of rebellion. To stop these burners, a police group called the DVC ride gas burning motorcycles to hunt down these cars.

First I'll talk the negatives about the movie.

The main problem with the movie is simply how the story is told. Its pretty boring throughout as much of the film contains many cars driving, but without any suspense or performing stunts, along with long conversations between the characters, which focus on either the burners or the DVC officers.

Now on to the positives.

The cast for the most part were great and did the very best job they had with the story given and the budget, which was obviously low considering the whole movie was shot in the Badlands of Drumheller, Alberta, which does make a very cool setting in a wasteland desert, sort of like the Mad Max films, but with more green and mountains. The main draw for me were the cars featured in the film. The main star car was of course the black and blue 1980 Pontiac Firebird Turbo Trans Am that McGavin drives, along with a black 1970 Plymouth Cuda and a white 71 Mustang coupe that gets blown up by the DVC. Another positive of the movie was the soundtrack, especially the theme song "Firebird" by Billy Ledster. I really with that song was released as a single, but unfortunately this is the only place where it can be found.

Overall I didn't mind the vibe of the movie as I can understand and appreciate a low budget movie and I had an good time with it. Thankfully it is currently free to the watch on YouTube, but I really wish this movie was given an official release to DVD fully restored in HD. Hopefully one day that will happen, but I'll give this movie 1 thumb up for not being a huge disappointment.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
On the WORST movie list
triviagal-115 May 2007
This movie is included in a documentary "The Worst 50 Movies Ever Made". A synopsis of it is:

The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made is a documentary that "celebrates" the kind of cinematic schlock that helped keep Mystery Science Theater 3000 on the air for many seasons. The film consists primarily of clips from some of the films widely considered to be the worst of the worst. ~ Perry Seibert, All Movie Guide

A clip from "Firebird 2015 AD" is included with Darren McGavin looking visibly embarrassed saying "Yes, a Burner. I'm a BURNER."

'nuf said.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Laughable Sci-Fi!
cfc_can9 January 2001
Firebird 2015 A.D. is meant to be a futuristic yarn about a period in which cars are illegal and the government sends out hit men to blow up the cars that are still being illegally operated. Sounds like a decent premise but what really sinks this movie is the incredibly low budget. The whole thing was shot outdoors in the woods and in the country (which don't cost anything to rent of course) What's worse, this film only has about ten characters or so with speaking parts in the whole movie! It's like watching a TV western from the 1950s. The special effects are in short supply and pretty laughable on their own. Firebird 2015 AD at least is good for some unintentional laughs. If you look closely at the actors, you can clearly see the discomfort on their faces. Who can blame them?
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So bad it's.....bad.
ejonconrad10 November 2015
Full disclosure: I watched this movie because I saw it on "The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made" DVD, so I was looking for a bad movie. I was hoping for some campy, 70s/80s post-apocalyptic fun, like Warriors of the Wasteland, or numerous other low budget movies from around the same time. This thing, however, was not bad in a fun way, but bad in a horrible and boring way.

So, if you're looking for "so bad it's good", this is not the movie you seek.

You get the basic idea: it's the distant future (of 2015), and gas burning cars have been outlawed. This was supposedly done because there was a fuel shortage, but of course it was really just a way for the Evil Government to control the people.

These laws are enforced by the "Department of Vehicular Control" or DVC, and they're resisted by a colorful cast of characters who live in the desert and conserve gas by driving the the lowest mileage cars possible. They're not trying to start a revolution or anything, just driving around in the desert having fun. They're called "burners", which is actually the most interesting thing in the movie. I really think they might have come up with that name and then tried (unsuccessfully) to write a movie around it.

The DVC are roughly as good at their jobs as the stormtroopers in Star Wars. The burners drive around in broad daylight through the open desert, surrounded by hills, kicking up clouds of dust that could be seen for miles, and talking on CB radios, but the DVC still seems to only find them by complete accident. Also, like the stormtroopers, they can't hit the broad side of a barn with their guns.

Doug McClure is the head of the local DVC patrol. He's conflicted about his job and trying in vain to control his subordinates, who have a tendency to get get all murderous and rapey when left to their own devices.

The burners aren't really organized, but they all defer to Red, played by Darren McGavin, who owns the eponymous vehicle. He lives in a secret location, which appears to be the only building for miles around, but of course the DVC is unable to find it. The action of the movie is precipitated by the arrival of his estranged son, Cam - played by an actor desperately trying to hide his English accent.

That's basically the plot. It's not a spoiler to tell you there are plenty of pointless (and not very exciting) car chases and explosions, and not to expect too much of a payoff at the ending. In fact, it doesn't so much "end" as get to 90 minutes and stop.

Perhaps the only amusing thing are their attempts to titillate the audience without losing their PG rating. There's the randy girl-burner, Jill, who has to work ridiculously hard to seduce the clueless Cam. This culminates in a millisecond long topless shot (don't blink or you'll miss it). There's also a weird scene where a female DVC agent takes a very sensual shower - fully clothed!

Probably the worst thing about the movie is the soundtrack - a bunch of terrible songs written just for this. I had to turn the sound down every time one started playing.

Speaking of music, here's a little bit of trivia: this movie came out the same year Rush released Red Barchetta, which has basically the same theme. Red Barchetta is much better, and of course rock songs don't have to make sense.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I have no idea where this was going
BandSAboutMovies27 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
In 2015 - remember when - the US government outlawed gasoline, only allowing the elite, the military and law enforcement to use it. No one is allowed to own or use a car and those who go against the law are called Burners, who are policed by the DVC (the Department of Vehicle Control).

Red (Darren McGavin, Carl Kolchak himself) is a Burner who loves his 1980 Trans Am. His son, Cameron, has no interest in cars and continually gets upset at his father for breaking the law.

Another Burner is working with a Senator to make civilian use of cars legal again, but as he's on his way, a DVC squad led by McBain (Doug McClure, SST: Death Flight, TV's The Virginian) intercepts him. Dolan, one of the crazier DVC members, blows the guy up with a grenade launcher. Shana, another team member, is upset about this and how the matter has been handled.

Red keeps trying to get Cameron into cars, including having him watch a race between him and Indy, a Burner who races a Mustang. But Cameron is more into Indy's daughter Jill, who shows him how to drive a dune buggy. While the two older men race, they run afoul of the DVC.

Cameron and Jill have better plans - they go to a barn to have sex. Of course, the DVC attack them, kicking Cameron's wimpy ass and stealing Jill. It's up to the two Burners to save her.

Shana helps them out and Cameron and Jill use Red's Firebird to drive the Senator to the meeting while Red gets to know Shana better.

Is it a coincidence that this Canadian movie - and the Canadian band Rush in the song "Red Barchetta" - both created a world where racing cars were illegal?

This movie never gets as good as the poster. Or as what it should be about. That said, Darren McGavin does this material a favor and seems like he's having fun. It's an interesting concept and I wish it had been better, but there you go. As Orange Goblin says, "Some you win. Some you lose."
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
It's pretty bad.
dukeb0y25 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Don't you wonder sometimes, how actors like Darren McGavin, and Doug McClure, who done pretty good TV shows and movies. End up on this turkey. I mean it looks like it was filmed with a video camera and let's just ride around in the desert. Of course cars are really cheap back then so if you tear up a Mustang who cares.

And we have dune buggies and such and it looks like a Native American running around with not much on and putting on war paint. I couldn't find a plot to this movie. I mean really I don't think this would even make a good driving movie from the 1980s.

Well Darren and Doug are gone now. But if they were around I'd ask them what on Earth made them choose this particular movie. Because the budget looks worse than a TV movie. Which it probably was.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Another Doug McClure Masterpiece
Hitchcoc31 March 2018
Doug McClure was Trampas on The Virginian. This was the highlight of his career. He played a reckless pretty boy. Well, what do you know. He is doing it here again. Except for the fact that this film has no foundation and is about as dull as a movie can be. It's a series of desert races that go nowhere, build no suspense, and when over, don't matter at all. Apparently, there is a gas shortage, but these guys are able to burn gas. When I saw Waterworld, I wondered what the end game was. At least they sort of had one. Nothing doing here.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Psychological futuristic piece with great upside
drystyx17 March 2007
This is one of those movies that even if you don't agree with the concept, the director does a splendid job of making you think, much like "Unforgiven", in which you are compelled to side with a "murderer or women and children". Here, you are compelled to side with self righteous mechanics of the future. This is extremely difficult since mechanics pretty well control America today. But the writing and directing is very clever. In the future, the government controls gas and motor vehicles. One young man is part of a small family type group that rebels against this and has their own vehicles. He agrees with the government. The girl he is interested in, insists otherwise. Meanwhile, McClure has the catalyst role. He leads some soldiers in the area who are responsible for keeping the regulations. One of the soldiers is an extremely macabre, deranged man. Here again, the film is cleverly drawn to show how the truly dangerous and deranged men are often not the ones who paint their faces, but rather pulling strings. Unlike other movies in this genre, the action is very realistic, and the people react in a way that doesn't make you roll your eyes. They are human and make mistakes. No comically choreographed fight scenes here. This is both a thinking man's piece, and a movie with action. The characters present an upside. One of the best movies of this genre.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kolchak in 2015 AD
StuOz26 June 2023
In 2015 AD there is a law against car ownership, which creates conflict.

In the 70s I was a fan of McGavin in Kolchak The Night Stalker and the actor has not changed much since that series so it is a struggle not to think of this as - Kolchak in 2015 AD.

However, this is a flawed flick as just too much screen time is given to a pointless plot about a young couple falling for each other.

Yes, the cars are good, the filming locations are wonderful, but this needed about 30 minutes edited out of it.

There is only one way to watch this movie - late at night when you are winding down and will put up with anything.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed