The Final Option (1982) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
75 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Ten of the Most Exciting Minutes in Action Film History
bookkritik24 November 2001
Yes, there is some cheesy acting, but the payoff in this film is excellent! After reading other commentaries on this film, I won't spoil the ending for anyone who hasn't see the film when I say that it concludes with an accurate portrayal of special ops folks in action. But it is not only accurate, it is exciting, and well shot (love the view through the mask!). Combine accuracy and excitement and you have something that beats most of those other "special ops" films hands down. It makes Rambo et al seem downright nonsensical (which it is), and rightly so.

And as someone who studied in Europe for several years and saw the political far left in action on the streets of the major cities, I can tell you that many of them talked just like they do in the movie. And yes, the guerrilla theatre production lampooning the US is accurate, that type of theatre did take place.
32 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better Than Advertised!
bsmith55528 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"The Final Option" aka "Who Dares Wins" has been given some lame reviews however, I liked it. It's the story of a peace /anti nuclear protest group that is possibly planning a terrorist attack on American interests.

Captain Peter Skellen (Lewis Collins) is an elite British Special Air Services (SAS) officer who is chosen to go undercover and infiltrate the group. To make him credible to the organization, he is "kicked out" of the SAS for beating on two fellow officers. Leading the terrorists is Frankie Leith (Judy Davis) and Rod (John Duttine). The ease in which Skellen gains the confidence and cozies up Frankie is a little hard to believe. Rod doesn't trust the newcomer.

Anyway, it seems that the group is planning to take over the American Ambassador's residence during a dinner party attended by several dignitaries. They plan to demand the detonation of an atomic device over a military base in Scotland to demonstrate the destructive power of such a device and force world peace on the world.

The group overtakes the Residence and holds the persons inside hostage. Included in the hostages are the American Secretary of State (Richard Widmark) and a high ranking American General, Ira Potter (Robert Webber). Outside, Commander Powell (Edward Woodward) and SAS commander Col. Hadley (Tony Doyle) prepare to rescue the hostages. Negotiations between Powell and Frankie are initiated.

Meanwhile, Skellen' wife Jenny and their young daughter are taken hostage nad held by a group led by the villainous Helga (Ingrid Pitt). Preparations are made to rescue them. Back at the Residence, Skellen manages to get a message out to the outside. In the best part of the movie, the SAS stages a spectacular rescue mission to free the hostages while a separate group rescues Skellen's wife and child but not before a cat fight between Jenny and Helga. With only one dignitary killed, the operation is a success.

Lewis Collins was once touted as the next James Bond. I think he would have been a good choice based on his performance. here. Judy Davis steals the picture as the stern female militant leader. Some of the so-called names such as Richard Widmark, Edward Woodward and Robert Webber are not given enough to do but do their best within limited roles.

A better than average BOMB.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
DEALING WITH TERRORISTS Warning: Spoilers
While earlier generations dealt with spies from foreign countries all of that changed as terrorists began attacking on their own in splinter cells secretly located in various countries, in some cases aided and abetted by people born and raised in those countries. No longer could James Bond face off against and all-encompassing evil organization or foe. Instead home grown terrorists were now the problem.

In May of 1980 a group of Iranian Arabs captured the Iranian Embassy in London. With 26 hostages negotiations went on for a few days. Then the SAS (Special Air Service) put in play an operation and saved the hostage. The story was turned into a book and then later used as the basis for the film THE FINAL OPTION.

British forces have learned of an imminent attack to be committed by a group that calls themselves the CND (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament). When one of their men planted in the group is killed they decide to take on a different tactic.

The SAS receives two foreigner to train with them, one American and one German. During their training the two men are tortured and accused of being spies by team leader Captain Peter Skellen (Lewis Collins). With no authority or cause to do so, Skellen is dismissed from his regiment and out on his own. In reality this provides him cover to infiltrate the CND as a disgruntled ex-SAS officer.

His contact advises him to meet Frankie Lieth (Judy Davis) and Rod Walker (John Duttine), the leaders of a group known as the People's Lobby. This is the real group behind the CND and the terrorist organization in the midst of a major operation they've been planning. Skellen becomes involved with Lieth who sees him as an asset while Walker is skeptical. A few incidents put into play to solidify Skellen's credentials with the terrorists and he's soon on the fast track to help them.

But Walker still distrust Skellen and has him followed, watched as he meets with his wife to assure her that he's safe and doing what he's been instructed to do. With this evidence in hand Lieth finally worries that Skellen might not be who he claims. She instructs other members of the group to kidnap his wife and daughter and uses their abduction to force him into aiding them in their plot.

That plot involves raiding the US ambassador's estate and capturing the ambassador, US Secretary of State and other high officials along with their wives. In return for their release the terrorists led by Lieth demand that a nuclear missile be launched at the Holy Loch naval base.

Only Skellen can find a way to aid his fellow SAS team into the building to stop the plans of the terrorists. But can he do it and contain casualties to a minimum if at all?

The movie is a solid piece of entertainment and allows its star Collins the chance to have become a major actor in the heroic styled films that the Bond films had become. For some reason that never came to fruition. It certainly was not due to this film or its reception by the public. When released it was the #6 film at the box office in UK that year.

The film had its supporters and detractors when released though. Producer Euan Lloyd wanted to take movies back to where they had been portraying soldiers in a more positive light than seen in recent years. President Reagan and his staff viewed the film positively. But critics weren't as kind viewing the film as a hawkish and terrible.

All in all the films does offer a solid action film that fans of the genre will enjoy. Perhaps a bit slower than most but that's to develop the storyline on display. When push comes to shove the depiction of the SAS team shows them in a positive light doing what they do best, what their mission is. The acting is very well done and the performance by Davis led her to many more substantial parts. It might not be a film that everyone will want to add to their collection but it is definitely one worth giving a watch.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
All Right Boys, On Me!
deapod6 July 2001
Warning: Spoilers
THE FINAL OPTION, like RED DAWN and THE SOLDIER, was a product of that long-ago era called The Cold War. A lot of people today seem to forget that there really were groups like the movie's The People's Lobby, and the Nuclear Disarmament movement was going hot and heavy. And it's true that the Soviet Union, through the KGB and the other East Bloc intelligence agencies, funded these groups, and terrorist outfits like the Baader-Meinhof and the Red Brigades. So there's a background to this story. And, really, it's not too bad. The acting is pretty decent, especially Edward Woodward (who would go on to do BREAKER MORANT and TV's THE EQUALIZER). However, I think that they could have infiltrated Skellen into the bad guys without beating the snot out of those two unsuspecting exchange officers (especially the rather wimpy looking US "Ranger" Captain). But what really makes the film is the climactic assault on and clearing of the US Ambassador's residence. Of course, this is based upon the assault on the Iranian Embassy in 1980. Still, it looks great, and also seems very realistic. For example, no SAS troopers are killed by the terrorists, but one is injured going through a flaming window. And, unlike your average American hero, or member of THE A-TEAM, you see Skellen reload his empty MAC-10. As for any nay-sayers who wonder why the SAS guys don't get shot, it's a fact that when an entry team does its job right, and the opposition is basically untrained, the advantage always goes to the side with the training and the surprise. I'd like to see a new SAS movie, if it's made by the same team. These British film makers do a better job than our own American ones, because they go for realistic, plausible action and plots, rather than the overblown, hyper, unrealistic stories that Hollywood loves to make. Mind you, I love movies like DIE HARD, LETHAL WEAPON, and such, but it's refreshing to see something that looks like a training film done right.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good British Action Movie
LuboLarsson4 October 2005
Who Dares Wins is a top British action movie made in the early 80's. It's star Lewis Collins was very well known in the UK from the hit TV show "The Profesionals". It was certainly made to cash in on the famous Iranian Embassy siege a mere year before they released this, which was televised live in Britain as the SAS stormed the building. Who Dares Wins has certainly dated as all 80's action films have, but it has great action scenes and stunt work. Collins is good in this and perhaps would have made a good 007, I don't know if he ever tested for the role but his Bond would have been closer to Connery than any since. The story is very silly and some scenes like the "rock concert" are cringe worthy but the action makes up for it, with a superb siege at the end.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Drags in places but the action is great
Tweekums30 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This film may open with a CND peace march but things don't stay peaceful for long; one of the marchers is shot through the mouth by a sniper using a crossbow! It appears he may have been undercover as the security services clearly believe that a terrorist organisation is using a peace organisation called The People's Lobby as a front. In order to infiltrate the group it is arranged for SAS Captain Peter Skellen to be thrown out of the regiment so he can pretend to be sympathetic with the groups' cause. His approach is as subtle as a brick; he goes to an event put on by the lobby, walks up to its leader; Frankie Leith and proceeds to seduce her! He tells her that he is ex-SAS and she thinks he could be of use to them despite the objections of other members. By the time it comes for them to strike she is less sure but as the group has taken his wife and baby daughter hostage she is she he will do as he is told.

Their immediate target is the house of the US Ambassador; he his hosting a dinner attended by the British Foreign Secretary, the US Secretary of State and the general in charge of Strategic Air Command... Frankie believes that with these hostages the authorities will have no choice but to give in to their demands. She informs the authorities that if the hostages are to survive a nuclear missile must be fired at the submarine base at Holy Loch... as the Secretary of State points out she is clearly insane. With such a crazy demand it is only a matter of time before the building is stormed by the SAS.

This isn't a great film but it is a lot of fun; early action nicely introduces the key characters and grabs the viewers attention but after that is slows down somewhat until the terrorists get round to seizing the Ambassador's house. Things then get tense until it is time for the raid and that is the sequence that really makes the film worth watching. SAS Troopers abseil down from their Scout helicopters and land on the roof; these troops then lower themselves to the balcony before entering through the windows; meanwhile two more troops crash trough the windows and shoot terrorists while dangling beneath a helicopter! This action may have been a little exaggerated but anybody who has seen the news footage of the SAS raid on the Iranian Embassy will find it easy to believe. Lewis Collins was just right in the role of Skellen and Judy Davis was great as Frankie. The films main weakness was clearly the terrorists' demand; nobody would seriously believe they could force anybody to fire a nuclear missile and these characters all seem to think the plan will work... not one suggests it might not work! Still there is enough action to forgive this fault.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great action and plot but unbelievable characters
Croc22 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is an entertaining film which culminates in some exciting action scenes. The problem is the main terrorist character Frankie who takes Skellen on board. Would she really do this? The other members of her People's Lobby warn her that Skellen could be working undercover but she ignores them ! It's just too ridiculous. Also the terrorists see Skellen meeting up with his contact and then eliminate the contact, so that should make them more suspicious. Supposedly Frankie takes Skellen on board because they develop a relationship in the space of five minutes of cheesy chat-up lines. It can only be explained by the comment towards the end that they are "amateurs".

The other ridiculous aspect is the terrorists demand that the British government drop a nuclear bomb on a submarine base. Firstly they are against nuclear bombs so this hardly seems something they would demand. Secondly they should realise that the Government wouldn't do it in a million years...

From the SAS point of view, the plot seems believable. The rescue scenes at the end are gripping and will leave you in a chill the first time you see them, particularly the Mews scenes.

It's worth watching anyway
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Intended as a salute to the fabulous SAS, but just too dumb (and too damned unbelievable).
barnabyrudge5 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
In Europe, it's known as Who Dares Wins; in America, it's known as The Final Option, but under any title this ludicrous SAS action flick asks the audience to put their disbelief to one side for around two hours. I find it incredibly hard to comprehend how Lewis Collins (the hero here) was almost chosen as Roger Moore's successor in the Bond films.... this guy is so expressionless he'd struggle to get a job in a waxwork museum (as a waxwork!!!) Luckily, Judy Davis is on hand to partially redeem the affair with a meaty performance as a hard-line lady terrorist, and there's a climactic ten minute action sequence that is quite competently orchestrated by director Ian Sharp. Let it be added that it's a very, very, very long wait for these closing excitements to come around, and I can't honestly say that a near two hour wait for a bit of decent action was worth the effort.

SAS hard man Peter Skellen (Lewis Collins) goes undercover among a group of peace protesters who would like to see the end of nuclear weapons stock-piling. He meets their leader Frankie (Judy Davis), a strong-talking and opinionated woman who might just be capable of taking extraordinary measures to achieve her goals. Frankie's dedicated bunch violently lay siege to the American Embassy in London, demanding that a nuclear missile be fired at a naval base in Scotland (she believes that when the world witnesses a nuclear blast for real, everyone will be so appalled that they will join her campaign for disarmament). Unfortunately for Frankie, she makes the mistake of taking Skellen on her little embassy raid, and he plans to thwart their plan from inside with a little well-timed outside help from his SAS comrades.

The film is inspired - quite obviously - by the awesome SAS assault on the Iranian Embassy in 1981. Someone who saw that event on the news apparently thought it would be good to devise a film along similar lines. Unfortunately, the film is rather banal, with too much stupid dialogue and a heck of a lot of embarrassingly bad scenes (the arch-bishop's debate which descends into a riot, anyone?) Frankie's idea to bring about peace by instigating a nuclear blast is ridiculous anyway, so she becomes a laughable figure just when the audience is on the verge of viewing her as an interesting villain. Who Dares Wins tries to be a celebration of the military legend that is the SAS, but at the same time it dips into clumsy action clichés and ill-thought-out plotting. The result is a well-intentioned but wholly ineffective slice of Boy's Own absurdity.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Slightly tedious plot, but breathtaking action sequences.
bujin24 May 2001
This is a film I'd heard of years ago, but never got around to watching it until yesterday.

While the plot seems a little slow at times (an illusion created by watching too many hollywood action movies), and (as many people here have commented) the dialog can get a little cheesy, add to the fact that the hairstyles, clothing, vehicles, etc... look dated now. But that's not what I was watching the film for.

The actual action sequences in the film are typical special operations style action sequences, i.e. they're over practically before they've started! This film, if not realistic (I'm sure it is, but as someone who doesn't know how the SAS really operate, I couldn't comment), is totally believable. From the handover by the police to the military, through the planning phase of the operation, the MOE (fast-roping from helicopters onto the roof, then abseiling down the side of the building), the total communication throughout the assault. It's absolutely breathtaking.

This is no Hollywood Action Movie. It's totally different from the likes of "Operation Delta Force", etc... There are no cheesy one-liners when a terrorist is dropped. There is no jumping about, emptying whole magazines (and more!) into people, shooting from the hip at targets 200 metres away and hitting them with the first shot, while snipers on the opposite side couldn't hit the Titanic from 2 metres away.

So, to sum up, I'd give the plot, characters and acting 7/10, but the action sequences, I'd wholeheartdly give 12/10! Fantastic stuff...
36 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining but patchy.
g-hbe5 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this many years ago and had good memories of it, so we settled down with a glass of wine last night to watch it on the 'Movies 4 Men' channel. Either I've changed or the film has not aged well. A rather over-groomed Lewis Collins (rigid hair, slightly camp wardrobe) does his 'Professionals' moody tough-guy act in this rather good story of a radical people's party taking hostage a group of top-brass and the SAS effort to free them. The first half of the film is all over the place, but it tightens up later on and of course (SPOILER) everyone is safe in the end. It looks rather like a TV-movie version of a 'Professionals' story, but maybe that's not so bad. Could have been a lot better.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Watch It for Judy Davis, Ingrid Pitt, and Action Scenes
TedMichaelMor17 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Ian Sharp's intelligent direction of an inept screenplay, careful action sequences, and finely honed acting (to a point) by Judy Davis and Ingrid Pitt define this entertaining action film. Phil Meheux's beautiful cinematography and John Grover's editing almost cover the considerable number of lapses in the script.

However, far-fetched elements in the story ultimately undermine direction, acting, and action scenes. The script largely seems contrived instead of clever or creative, though elements of the narrative work well enough for two female characters to develop in interesting ways. That might be because Judy Davis and Ingrid Pitt are simply highly skilled actors. Roy Budd's score also integrates (or appears to blend in) elements of the film.

This is not a masterwork, but it does entertain better than any James Bond film ever does. One finds a measure of pleasure in realising how at least one Bond film might have worked had it enjoyed some of the gifts used to create this movie.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Top marks
Leofwine_draca23 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of those British thrillers that imitates Hollywood and manages to better it in many respects. It's a taut and heavily realistic story of terrorism and a siege, but the emphasis is on realism which means that the gung-ho antics are brief and over very quickly. Personally I like the slow build approach, I think it works very well here, and it makes the climax oh-so-great. Lewis Collins has never been tougher as the SAS agent infiltrating a left-wing group, and everything else just comes together to build an engrossing, highly suspenseful picture. Top marks.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Watchable thick-ear - if you can stomach the laughable plot.
Pedro_H22 September 2005
Lewis Collins used to be in a hit series called The Professionals which was the height of 70's b/s TV. A strange special unit (CI5) that went around London firing guns, chasing people in pre ABS Ford Escorts, crashing through windows and doing other things that look good on the box. This is a bit more of the same. Not the same story, but lots of things that make little sense, but do provide cheap thrills for the undemanding audience.

The SAS are a kick-down-the-door British military unit that goes to places that others don't and is the creme de la creme of the British forces. However rather limited in scope and purpose. Collins plays Capt. Peter Skellen who pretends to have been kick out of the service in order to infiltrate a terrorist gang hiding behind CND.

(I bet they were pleased!)

While "hide in plain sight" is not unknown in security service circles what goes on here piles the unlikely on the unlikely until the whole thing starts creaking before the plot has even been set up. Can you imagine what it will get like later?

Thankfully the terrorists are thick as short planks and plain crap at their job - so no great detective skills are needed. They even hover under revolutionary posters just in case you don't get their drift or politics.

Indeed Collins merely has to give a couple of cheap chat-up lines to female revolutionary Judy Davis (is this where it all started to go wrong dear?) and her easy-off pants are history. Talk about pushover - there are crack addicted prostitutes who would be harder work!

It all boils down to a grand climax that we can all see coming like a Dutch milk train with serious engine trouble, but don't let me spoil the fun - if you are the sort that can live with the above.

To make things more kosher stars of yesteryear come on to do their bit and I give them great credit - they have all waited until the director has shouted "cut" before demanding their cheques.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lame story...but
andreas-besenlechner23 April 2006
The first 10 minutes of the movie, the introduction of the SAS is really good. But then, the story of "Who Dares Wins" becomes a bit boring until the last 20 minutes. Not that i am an action junkie, who needs an explosion every 2 seconds, but the story was so lame, that i needed ten cup of coffees to stay awake.

But....

At the moment the SAS assault begins, the movie rocks ! For me, the storming of the embassy is one of the best movie moments in my live and i love it every time i watch it. The great music by good old Roy Bud also fits perfectly.

PS: Shame that Lewis Collins never became a big movie star !
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Soldier of Fortune Magazine Approved
swojtak15 September 2004
I saw this movie when it was titled, "The Final Option". I was an avid reader of Soldier of Fortune (SOF) magazine and it was recommended as a must see movie. It was noted for its realism. In addition, it was felt the peace movement was actually supported by Russia because by having the "West" disarm, it would allow Russia to get stronger while the West got weaker. You see this in the movie when the bankers help funnel money to the peace movement.

The main reason for seeing the movie was the action by the Special Air Service (SAS). SOF magazine said the SAS cooperated in the making of the movie. I thought the movie was a little long but the action parts were first rate. The final part was the best part. The best part was when the camera was filming through the gas mask and you could hear and see what it is really like to be on the inside. I remember the huffing and puffing and the words, "One terrorist down, one terrorist down" as each one got shot. SOF magazine said when the SAS goes in, there are no prisoners taken-only dead terrorists. As a real law enforcement person I am always complaining how the public has no idea of what really happens during police actions. The public always seems to ask why did the police not shoot the gun out of a persons hand or why did the police shoot or didn't shoot. Split second decisions have to be made and it is so easy to to be a "Monday morning quarterback" They never see the confusion. I think every person who thinks the cops are always wrong should see this movie.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The British SAS battle terrorism
Vang00013 October 1999
This movie was one of the first to describe or portray the deft skill of the S.A.S. Britain's foremost special forces. This movie is quite good, but, like any other movie has its weak points. The story is based on terrorists who take control of an embassy in London and a SAS soldier who infiltrates them to thwart their plot. Quite good in parts.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good action movie
angelapeako20 January 2007
This was one of the first movies I was allowed to go and see with my twin sister and friends back in the 80's. We were all big 'Professionals' fans.

We were not disappointed, there were really good action scenes and the plot very much mirrored the politics of the time. Lewis Collins plays a convincing, arrogant, SAS captain, who is sent undercover to infiltrate a terrorist organisation. His plan does not work out. He was supposed to identify the terrorist target, but is always kept in the dark. This all leads to a dramatic climax as he plays the hero at the end of the movie.

Unfortunately with today's hi-tech movies, this has dated somewhat but it does give a great snapshot of the 80's.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Old fashioned but exciting in parts.
RatedVforVinny2 December 2019
This film seemed way outdated even before it's release; though in saying this, it does have some gripping action sequences and some believable S.A.S combat methods. Ironically i started watching the day before the Lewis Collins (r.i.p) actually died. In time it has been remembered and now more so than ever.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
All we are saying is give peace a chance or else
bkoganbing6 July 2015
The Final Option has American players Richard Widmark and Robert Webber joining a British cast playing the American Secretary of State and head of the Strategic Air Command over in London for an arms limitation conference. What happens is that they get taken hostage by a radical group of terrorists who are nicely moled into the peace movement.

British action star Lewis Collins gets a rigged incident so he can resign from the SAS the British equivalent of the Delta Force and infiltrate the peace movement. Clearly he doesn't fool anybody, but Collins has his uses and Judy Davis the head of the radical cell finds him useful in many ways.

In fact the two female terrorists Davis and Ingrid Pitt really walk off with this film with their brand of fanaticism.

When the shooting starts toward the end it is the best part of the film as SAS does what it does best, kill enemies.

Final Option is a well done action flick that the Margaret Thatcher government must have loved.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Spot on for its time,how people forget
rockwellcm-123 January 2007
I have given this a 8 not because of the acting or the film its self,it was full of goofs,but the story was bang on the mark. How people forget how it was back in 1983 when the film came out if you get yourself along to a disused nuclear shelter like the one in Fife,Scotland (Secret Bunker)and take a look at the posters of all the CND marches,ban the bomb,etc you begin to remember how it was back then and the fear the cold war had on people,it was also a time of extreme Right,and left wing politics in the UK (Skinheads,Anarchists,National Front,and Communist party's) The SAS were also in the news,and the footage was almost like the Iranain Embassy footage at the time complete with Anna Ford news reading for ITN

From an army point of view,there was some good Accuracys amongst the goofs,the SAS train with live ammo,not blanks,the HQ was correct,the train in the Welsh hills,and they founded the flash bang grenade,the Hotel entry was also correct,blowing the hinges of the front door,with a shot gun,and the SAS train with other international army's (deemed friendly to the UK)

the funding for the terrorists was not too far from the real life truth,and it was a time of mercenaries,everybody was hiring everyone who was special op trained

I found the Film'looked' a bit like the Proffesionals TV series at the time in places,and the Music also conveyed this,this was deliberate on Sir Lew Grades part as to make a smooth transition from small screen to Big for Mr Collins

the real hero in the film is the Scottish actor who plays a fellow solider (of Collins) in the film,who plays it straight and realistic throughout

I have had this film since it came out (2 tapes,and a DVD),not in my all time top 10,but comes out from time to time,to bring back memory's of a forgotten time,and a time of Cold War fear

Donald Suttie
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sheer British Entertainment
funky_dunc15 March 2004
Who Dares Wins is possibly the most right-wing film ever made in the UK. The film is virtually an advert for Thatcherism and the Conservative party. This however give it a unique status among UK films.

Most British films are about class, isolation, unemployment among other such themes that show the uglier side of British life. WDW is totally uncritical of the way Britain is and instead concentrates on giving us action. On this it delivers. The action is British, no one-liners or glorification of killing. The SAS are portrayed as what they are, professionals with a dirty job. In this the film is pretty realistic.

What is not realistic is the idea that a hard left group would actually encourage a nuclear bombing. However, many of the other reviews criticise the film because it suggest left-wing people are a threat. These people have forgotten that at the time the NUM, CND, NGU and the Labour Party were dominated by people bent on violent action. The idea that they could try to attack government itself was plausible at the time, even if it wasn't particularly likely.

I wish that more British filmmakers out there would give us pure escapism, which is the intention with WDW, instead of endless social commentary. Whilst there is a place for Ken Loach/Mike Leigh/Danny Boyle et al, there is also a place for nonsense like this.

WDW is escapism. It does not challenge us all it seeks to do is entertain us, and it does this pretty well.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Boring
Thorsten-Krings27 March 2008
This is actually a pretty bad film. The ideology is not as perverse as in those films Collins made later. However, my main misgivings about the film are that it is implausible and quite frankly boring for a long time. The whole concept of an ex-SAS man joining terrorists for no particular reason isn't very convincing and you can't help wondering why a group of highly organized terrorists (who later become pretty clueless) fall for it. The film starts with a pretty powerful scene but then meanders for quite a long time building up towards the great finale. Overall, I think Who dares wins could have been an interesting 45 minutes episode of The Professionals but the story doesn't carry a feature film. Although reasonably successful at the time this film initiated the demise of Collins' career who in the eighties mainly made cheap and dubious soldier-of-fortune or army films. Pity, because he actually is quite a versatile actor but at the end of the day Martin Shaw chose his roles more carefully and has a career that's still successful.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Die Hard" - take a hike!
Wi$eGal16 December 1999
With Roy Budd's thunderous theme music, spot-on cinematography and action set pieces refreshingly absent of blue screen visual effects. "Who Dares Wins" is pure action movie through and through.>

Lewis Collins' effective performance as Peter Skellern delivers Bond-style cheek and charisma especially during his scenes with Judy Davis (Frankie Leith). Although, sadly, cheesy dialogue and interaction with Rosalind Lloyd (Jennie Skellern) lets him down. A switch between the character of merciless undercover agent and likeable family-guy he's clearly not comfortable with.

Both Judy Davis and Ingrid Pitt carry off superbly powerful female roles written beyond token-women-posing-with-machine-guns. Particularly Pitt who's performance adds a sadistic ominance whenever she's on screen.

Action wise, several brutally vicious fight sequences added to the gobsmacking finale make this one hell of a movie.

Who Dares Wins does get bogged down a little in the posturing grandstanding of Woodward, Widmark and Davis late on where the focus changes.

Maximum plus points to Phil Meheux (cinematographer) for the truly heart-stopping footage.

All together a damn good 120 minutes and Britain's best shot at making an action movie. I love it, watch it whenever I can. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED and vastly underrated. Seventeen years on it's stood the test of time. Classic.
33 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
not bad though
georgel_1232 January 2006
one of the mistakes which really stand out in this film is when the sas are about to rescue skellern's (lewis collins )wife and child who are being held hostage. the sas plan to gain entry by an adjoining property,after making all their preparations the adjoining wall is blown out by explosives, simultaneously the lights are cut off in the room holding the hostages, soldiers storm in and shoot both terrorists dead, yet when the camera pans around the room a PC is seen skellern's wife is seen, the baby is also seen none the worst for wear. i would have thought the baby would be screaming amid all the noise and confusion.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Still as bad as I remembered.
KEVMC18 September 2003
SAS Captain Peter Skellen goes undercover to infiltrate The People's Lobby, a group of radicals who have aligned themselves to the CND movement. They plan to gain access to the US Embassy in London and hold the Ambassador and his guests hostage, while making outrageous demands of the British Government.

I'll keep this relatively short as the previous reviewer accurately nailed this film to the floor. I saw it on its theatrical release when I was 15, and didn't think it was particularly good then. I sat up watching a late night screening on the BBC at the weekend, as it had been some years since I had last seen it. It was as bad as I remembered it to be. A combination of a poor screenplay, bad acting, equally poor direction and woolly headed politics all serve to leave us with a disjointed mess. As the previous reviewer stated, the one saving grace is the cinematography. However, this alone cannot compensate for the overall shortcomings of the film.

I noticed that the film came from the same production team that gave us 'The Wild Geese'. While that film stretched credibility in terms of the age of the protagonists, it crucially didn't take itself too seriously, and was professionally handled. 'Who Dares Wins' by comparison is a charmless shambles.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed