The Lords of Discipline (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Okay movie has little regard for its characters
Boyo-29 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I did not read the novel "The Lords of Discipline" by Pat Conroy so I cannot comment on how successful the movie is in terms of the original material, as some of the other comments are able to do.

But judging the movie on its own merits, its half a triumph, half disappointment. I saw it when it was first released, because I liked David Keith and, well, I saw everything.

This review openly discusses several plot points.

Keith plays Will, everyone's favorite. As he is returning to the Academy for senior year, he is welcomed by staff and classmates alike. This year is going to be slightly different, he finds out early, because a black student (Pierce, played by Mark Breland) has entered the school (its 1964 and we are in the South). He is asked by Bear (Robert Prosky) to keep an eye on this particular student. Will wants nothing more than to coast through his senior year, but Bear calls in old favors so Will is obligated.

On Hell Night, naturally all the white trash goes straight for Pierce. They also go for an overweight student called Poteete. Both boys are humiliated and tortured by the suffering does not end for Poteete, as he is kidnapped (sort of) by 'The Ten', a secret society of the ten best seniors. Their threats make a Hell Night hazing seem like a day at the beach. Poteete has to be talked down from a ledge, because he is so frightened by 'The Ten' and that he won't be able to survive the entire year. The next time he's on the ledge he successfully commits suicide. In the meantime, Pierce is also being singled out, but Will tells him to communicate what is going on, so at least he can report the cruelty that he is enduring.

Eventually Will decides 'The Ten' must be held responsible for their continuous torture. He recruits his roommates to help him. As they find out more and more, they are then singled out. Dante Pignetti (Rick Rossovich) is eventually expelled for something very trumped up and silly, but Will is still determined to get to the bottom of it.

The movie takes some questionable turns in the later innings. The characters played by Judge Reinhold, Bill Paxton and Michael Biehn are one-sided bigoted bullies and nothing else. They may as well all sleep under a rock, and most likely do not even deserve more than that, but its too easy to just show a future Grand Wizard of the KKK as being only that. Since Biehn reveals himself to be one of 'The Ten', its also extremely convenient that he is in a position to give demerits to the Will and his roommates, but it would have been more effective if he had been seen in that position BEFORE all the drama took place. Its also pretty lousy that the character of Poteete is only mentioned once after his suicide. There is no investigation from outside authorities, or even any motivation to 'get to the bottom of it' on his behalf. Its almost as if he's in the movie just so 'The Ten' can be introduced to the audience through his experience with them, and once he does that, he serves no purpose. But the character of Pierce dealt with them, also, so they would have been introduced through their cowardly treatment of him.

David Keith was very popular in the late 70's/early 80's. I saw most of his movies and am sorry he never had a lengthy career, but it seems as though Kurt Russell, Patrick Swayze, Dennis Quaid and Kevin Costner got all the parts David could have played. This was one of his only starring roles, and he's very good without overdoing it. He's always pretty believable, even when the movie isn't. 6/10.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent....
MetalHead1325 June 2003
Warning: Spoilers
It's hard to put into words how great this film is. I read the novel by Pat Conroy, and it became one of my all time favorites. Then, i rented the movie, somewhat afraid that it might not be as good.....or even good. But i was very wrong.....the movie was excellent....great chemistry of the actors, great direction, great screen writing. *Spoilers* Powerful seen when Pig is exiled from the Institute, they did a very good job with that.

A few changes in the story line, but great still. The acting's great, I'm a fan of Rick Rossovich and David Keith. I give this movie a full 10 out of 10 stars.....watch this movie, and read the book.....
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
response to pazmatza
johnfdeakinjr22 June 2007
I graduated from The Citadel and can tell you that the book is not a standing joke on campus and that almost everyone reads it during their knob year for their English class. It is true that upperclassmen are not allowed to touch knobs but this is a rule that was very loosely enforced in the 60s. I was not there in the 60s but it is a well known fact on campus and by alumni. I have never heard anything of that nature and I believe they made it worse than it really was in order to make people watch it and enjoy reading the book. All in all the book is much better than the movie. Read the book don't watch the movie, or at least read the book first.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good film, not as good as book
AshCUtiger10 June 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Being a major Pat Conroy fan, Lords of Discipline is my favorite book that he has written. The story is masterfully written and includes many different subplots that all connect together to form the main plot. The film was a great film that told the point of the story very well. However, when watching the film, I feel that many major parts of the book are left out. *BOOK SPOILERS* Annie-Kate, a major character in the book is left out. It brings even more blame to Tradd St. Croix because he got her pregnant then deserted her and left Will to take care of her. It adds much more to how the enormous amount of crap(for lack of better words) Will unknowingly took on in Tradd's place. Also, Pignetti's death is a very vital part in the book that should have been put in the movie because it ties so closely to "The Ten" and the roommates' relationship.

Well thats enough of my complaining about what could have been done better in the film. For someone who has not read the book, it is a great film and displays a wonderful message that all people should hear. However, I suggest reading the book before seeing the film. It will explain a lot and show a lot of different sides of the character. Lords of Discipline, the film, gets an A+ in my book.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Likable movie but don't expect everything you got in the novel!
notelvis225 September 2005
I was impressed with how well this movie captured the flavor of time and place. As a viewer I easily felt that it was Charleston, SC in the mid 1960's. The parts were well-cast and convincingly played. I would be comfortable suggesting this movie to others and would not mind seeing it again myself.

Having read Pat Conroy's original novel years ago I found that the characters in the movie looked remarkably like my imagination expected them to. That was another plus.

However......and this is minor......Pat Conroy's novels tend to be sprawling affairs with several plot lines (and the ensuing chaos) running concurrently. They do not condense down into a standard length feature film without editing a good bit of the original novel out. This is the case here......several minor items had to be changed for the movie to cover the fact that one of the major plot elements in the novel were left out entirely.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The First Cut is the Deepest
wes-connors17 April 2010
It's 1964 at the Carolina Military Institute. Returning for his senior year as a cadet, hunky David Keith (as Will "Bubba" McClean) and his pals discover the freshman "Knobs" include, for the first time, a young black man. As you might expect, he is the victim of racial hatred. Old-timer Robert Prosky (as "the Bear") enlists Mr. Keith's help in watching over the black cadet, Mark Breland (as Pearce). Keith gets reluctant help from his three roommates - piano playing Mitchell Lichtenstein (as Tradd St. Croix), weight-lifting Rick Rossovich (as Dante "Pig" Pignetti), and Italian Elvis fan John Lavachielli (as Mark Santoro).

Keith and his friends participate in "Hell Night" with the usual shenanigans. Of course, "scumbags," "maggots," and "faggots" are encouraged to vacate the premises. Overweight Malcolm Danare (as Poteete) is the first casualty. Then, a (not so) secret organization known as "The Ten" targets Mr. Breland. But, "The Lords of Discipline" isn't really about Breland or his race. Rather, it's a mystery thriller focusing on Keith and his roommates. And, even then, it's not much of a mystery. Most enjoyable are Keith and his three roommates, who manage to be appealing in some unappealing (and obvious) roles.

****** The Lords of Discipline (2/18/83) Franc Roddam ~ David Keith, Mitchell Lichtenstein, Rick Rossovich, Robert Prosky
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Citadel of 1963 vs 2006
lockwood-1011 August 2006
I will give this movie a grudging o.k. I feel the book was superior in all respects but hey, how can a movie live up to Pat Conroy's book. I was in the military for 8 years and a product of Conroy's 'damaged goods' sickness of the South. I had the privilige of attending that place but turned it down in favor of another school some 30 years ago. But please bear in mind that much has changed in the military and much of the brutality of the school has gone away with all the attention heaved upon it. I noticed that many of the readers comments indicate about the sadism but remember, Pat Conroy attended the Citadel in 1963 to 1967 when there were not the federal laws and scutiny that exists in 2006. I understand much of Conroy's distrust and bitterness about having attended then refused the commission for lack of a better word than conscience objector. I don't have a problem with that and can now relate having seen many of my fellow soldiers refuse to come back to service after the Gulf War started in 1990. Please read the book first and look deep into what Conroy is trying to impart to all of us. It is similar to 'Born on the 4th of July.' Don't look at today's Citadel with any type of similarity to what went on over 40 years ago. Like they say, it's gone with the wind...
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Where there's grave injustice there exists the potential for glorious justice
view_and_review26 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This movie requires some serious intestinal fortitude to watch. I could only wince as I heard the N-word used indiscriminately and see a young Black man being targeted for abuse. That was the apex of all things unjust in this movie, but they weren't the only things and he wasn't the only target. But any movie with serious injustice has the ability to have some glorious and righteous justice. The Lords of Discipline gave us both. We saw the wretched injustice of a military academy in the South as well as the actions of a courageous young man to right the wrongs.

1964 North Carolina wasn't known for tolerance. Their epic intolerance extended beyond ostracizing Blacks, they'd ostracize anyone different. When a military academy is integrated with its first Black cadet it was only a matter of time before the full weight of Southern inhospitality would come down on his neck. To his credit he bore the name calling and the general abuse with dignity and honor (if bearing abuse can be done with dignity and honor). What I mean is that he opted to go into the belly of the beast knowing what was in store for him and he took it like a soldier. That is until he was kidnapped by "The Ten."

"The Ten" were supposedly ten of the finest cadets of the graduating class and their job was to make sure that all undesirables were weeded out. They used any and all methods including kidnap and torture. Cadet Pearce (Mark Breland) was earmarked for such treatment until cadet Will (David Keith) risked his own future to save him.

It was an incredible act of bravery even if it wasn't done for Pearce's sake necessarily. You see, Will didn't have a soft spot for oppressed Black folks and didn't particularly care if Pearce made it through the academy or not, but what he did care about was the integrity of the academy. The academy always professed such high morals, values, and ethics that should they allow something so underhanded and dirty as "The Ten" then the high morals, values, and ethics weren't worth more than the paper they were printed on.

So, Will's actions to expose "The Ten" were beneficial to everyone. They were beneficial to the academy--to give it real prestige--they were beneficial to all of the cadets because now they could all compete to belong on equal footing, and by extension of that they were beneficial to Pearce who could now perform as a cadet without fear of torture or death. Yes, he would still have to put up with racists and bigots, but that was something he was dealing with already just living in the South.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wow
Doovie-227 November 2001
I enjoyed this movie thoroughly. Now i have never read the novel it is based on so i am not disillusioned by how "bland" an adaptation this is, but i must say that this was an interesting, intriguing and enjoyable film. It was deep and thought provoking and provided an insight into what was... and possibly still is considered to be the making of a man and a soldier.

Also, the fact that it is a veritable melting pot of future stars and character actors doesn't hurt. David Keith as a likeable character? Michael Biehn and Bill Paxton, a year before making Terminator together, a few years before making Aliens and ages before making Tombstone. Judge Reinhold, Rick Rossovich (the guy from Roxanne and pacific blue), Matt Frewer (HE LOOKS SO YOUNG!!!), the fat guy out of Godzilla (he is great). It was interesting seeing all these people in these roles, big and small.

Moral of the story, great flick :)
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Discipline, honor, loyalty, manliness.... and hazing
helpless_dancer10 February 2002
Here is a good movie showing why one should not bother with either the military or it's pissant little institutions of higher learning. Yes the novel is 10 times better, but this is not a bad film either. Do these military schools really develop character and produce real men or do they brainwash and engender false codes of honor and loyalty thereby turning out highly tuned robots to fight for all the real reasons wars are waged - oil, money, and population control? The smart money would bypass entering these halls of insanity.
5 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Does not come close to book
barbarausa12 February 2011
The movie is adequate and casting for "The Bear" was perfect. The film lost the eliminate of mystery and intrigue the book had. By showing "The Ten" to early and on campus they stole from the mythology of the fraternity. On the other hand, it is impossible to make a film that lives up to a Conroy novel as their is just too much. If a producer was smart they would hire Pat Conroy to make a TV series out of any one of his novels. I don't mean a mini series, but an actual TV series that would probably need to run three seasons. If Conroy didn't want to write the series than David E. Kelley could possibly do justice to many of Conroy's novels or in the case of the Lords Of Discipline Arron Sorkin could possibly write it. Obviously Pat would be the ideal writer though. Trying to do any Conroy novel in a two or even three hour film is just ridiculous. That's why "The Prince of Tides" was such a bad film. It did not stand a chance of having even the same story line as the novel because the real story could not be covered by a film.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nice militar academy drama
bellino-angelo201424 May 2022
Will McLean (David Keith) is a senior cadet at the Carolina Military Institute, a school that promises to make men of honor but practises brutal hazing to freshmen. McLean's roommates are Dante Pignetti (Rick Rossovich), Mark Santoro and Tradd St. Croix. In the time spent there McLean will join all the academy's activities (except breaking new cadets) and will see the corruption inside the institute, and will also try to unmask it (without some trouble and Pignetti getting expelled).

Despite I have not read the original novel LORDS OF DISCIPLINE I still liked the movie because it has some very good acting by everyone. I am not a huge David Keith fan but here he was very good as the lead, Rick Rossovich was very funny as the cadet that didn't stopped screaming, while Michael Biehn and Judge Reinhold give some of their best performances in their careers. The plot was great as there were lots of twists and turns when the leads were finding the truth.

Overall, a good militar academy drama that excedded my expectations as I was very surprised that I liked it very much. If you are searching something underrated from the 1980s, then this is for you.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
is this what The Citadel is really like?
bkoganbing19 October 2020
Noting that a good deal of The Lords Of Discipline was filmed in Charleston, South Carolina and the school our characters attend is the Carolina Military Institute, I was amazed that The Citadel lent itself to this production. From what I understand it can still be a frightening place. Only in the past decade did they get around to admitting women.

This story is set in 1964 and this school is now getting around to admitting its first black cadet. A lot of special interests want to see Mark Breland fail. Te usual hazing a plebe gets is with some real menace. Another one folks aren't fond of is Malcolm Danare and things end tragically for him.

Second in command Robert Prosky asks a favorite cadet upperclassman David Keith to keep an eye on Breland. Remember this is 1964 and the civil rights era is upon us and I think Prosky doesn't want too many Yankee faces looking into the school.

That doesn't mean anything for a certain secret elite society among the cadets called The Ten. They want to uphold the traditional (read racist) ways and this bunch would have been proud to serve with Nathan Bedford Forrest.. Michael Biehn heads it currently and he's a piece of work. This was the first of many roles like this for Biehn. He's a really menacing guy.

Keith and his three roommates Mitchell Lichtenstein, Rick Rossovich, and John Lachiavelli get targeted. The final confrontation between Keith and commandant G.D. Spradlin is beautifully played.

One more thing. The Commandant of the Citadel in 1964 was Mark Clark and one hopes the American commander of the Italian theater in World War 2 did not countenance these sort of doings.

The Lords Of Discipline is a fine film telling of times we hope have passed.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Had to see this, because I'm a huge Michael Biehn fan.
tstudstrup12 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This was before his big breakthrough in The Terminator, the following year. And he doesent dissapoint. Neither does David Keith in the lead (who looks exactly like a young Patrick Swayze) Bill Paxton and Rick Rossovich (in his biggest movie role as an actor (ever) are quite good as well.

Biehn who is very young here plays the main villain as the leader of a group of kadets in a military academy in 1964, known as the ten. Who kidnap and torture new privates to make them leave the academy. Biehn shows already here what a great actor he is. Being a very convincing menacing bully with out much more more than a mean smile here and there.

Bonus info. Biehn , Paxton and Rossovich were great friends, who probably met on the set of this movie. And throughout the 80'ies and up till 1993 they always appeared in Biehns movies.

Rossovich and Paxton had small parts in The Terminator, where Biehn played the heroic lead. Paxton played one of the leads alongside Biehn in Aliens. In Navy Seals, where Biehn played one of the leads, Rossovich and Paxton once more played supporting characters. And finally in Tombstone, where Biehn played one of the main villains, Paxton appeared one last time in a supporting role.

As for this movie, apart from one brutal torture scene, this felt like a lighter version of the much better Full Metal Jacket, that came out four years later. Which was obviousdly inspired by this movie, but took it to a more menacing level. F.M.J. is of course also a war movie, but its impossible not top compare the two. Especially, because one of the victims of the ten, reminds me a lot of the bullied fat private in F.M.J.

There are severeal plotholes, that doesnt make sense. But if you can look past them, you might enjoy this movie.

And its not a bad movie, but unless youre a Biehn fan, like me, you will probably find it boring.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ah, If only there were no book to compare it to...
KaJerm9 July 1999
The movie itself was mediocre-- but having read Pat Conroy's incredible novel, filled with cynicism, cruelty, depth, and of cource, deceit-- all that good stuff. Alas, without a love interest, the myriad losses, and the absolutely imperative dips into the depths of Senior Private Will McLean's psyche, this movie is simply a hollow time-waster about a Southern Military school. Read the book, skip the film-- or better yet (since the film was actually rather enjoyable) see the film first, and then bask in the sheer, dark goodness of Pat Conroy's writing. If only there were no Pat Conroy novel, this movie would be an enjoyable flick... Oh well.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very predictable version of the truth and a learning experience for some, including the actors..
drkstr601 December 2004
As a cadet who experienced a very similar situation, I found the story to be very close to the truth. I enjoyed watching the movie although most (if not all) of the performances were stilted and stuffy!

I was a former R.O.T.C. cadet, who was actually supposed to attend The Citadel (the institution that movie supposedly depicts) and attended another Military College...I found the depictions very close to some of the "on-goings" of Military College life for cadets (at that time), including some of the treatment of cadets with different ethnic backgrounds.

The performances of the "actors" in this movie showed their inexperience at that time. Although, some of those actors learned from the experience and are some of the best known character actors, although mostly in comedic roles (I wonder, why?) of current films, including: Judge Reinhold and "Wild" Bill Paxton.

I recommend this film as a film to be watched by those learning how to act. It is a prime example of what not to do. Hopefully, no one imitates any of the acting in this film but hopefully they will use it as a learning tool.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Out-Dated Bore
angelsunchained5 August 2011
The Lords of Discipline is a slow-moving, dull, boring, and badly acted 1980s film. The characters come off as cartoonish. David Keith is likable enough, and does a fair job considering what he has to deal with. The rest of the cast overplays their parts and none of them come across as real. The Southern accents are terrible, and it's hard to figure if this is a military college or a high school military school. Regardless, everyone in the cast is way to old to be students in either case. The worst scene is when Keith and his room mates kidnap a lawyer and tie him to a railroad track. The whole scene came across like a cartoon and the actor playing the lawyer gave a junior high school acting performance. Forget the Lords of Discipline.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It Had Potential
Theo Robertson17 September 2003
Set in a Carolina officer cadet school THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE tells the story of a racist guild within the school who are hell bent on making sure no black cadet will ever be at the passing out parade . It`s a fairly good film but had the potential to be so much better . The problem I had is that it takes place through the eyes of cadre officer Will who I thought just a little bit too fine , upstanding and moral to take seriously and it`s because of this the film doesn`t reach the heights it could have . It should also be pointed out because it`s filmed in England doubling as an American military base I couldn`t help but be reminded of the first half of FULL METAL JACKET , it never helps a movie comparing it to that classic segment

But as I said LORDS OF DISCIPLINE is an entertaining enough movie that features a bunch of actors who almost became stars in the 1980s . See if you can spot them
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Keith's first leading role and a good start for the likes of Paxton, Biehn & Rossovich.
DeuceWild_7713 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Let me start to say that i never read the acclaimed novel by Pat Conroy which this film is based on, so i'm judging only the movie itself.

"The Lords of Discipline" came out in a time this kind of "Military School" flicks were the latest popular trend in Hollywood, after the excellent "Taps", directed by Harold Becker and the surprise hit "An Officer and a Gentleman", directed by Taylor Hackford co-starred by David Keith playing Richard Gere's ill-fated best friend who was switched for his first leading role in this movie.

Keith delivered an acceptable performance as Cadet Will McLean, when starting his Senior year at Carolina Military Institute in 1964, he's assigned by his mentor, Lt. Col. "Bear" Berrineau (a very good & committed performance by Robert Prosky) to keep an eye on Tom Pearce, the first black student admitted in the Academy, to protect him from the bigotry of some of his fellow alumni. Around the same time, a secret organization within the school, called themselves "The Ten", are acting illegally forcing the undesired students, through the practice of torture and violence, to quit...

Franc Roddam's "The Lords of Discipline" moves at a nice pace, it's well filmed and the young actors (some of them gave here their first steps in the acting biz such as Michael Biehn, Rick Rossovich, Bill Paxton, Judge Reinhold, Matt Frewer or Jason Connery) are all superbly directed and convincing in their roles.

The weakest part is the not very well structured screenplay and the inability of Roddam to introduce a feeling of eerie and mystery to the whole, which could have lifted this movie to a higher appreciation. Some plot points got their resolution too fast in the III Act, leaving some unanswered questions and the mystery beyond "The Ten", the phantom society within the walls of the Academy, could have been more explored and handled better.

Nevertheless, this movie still delivers a solid piece of entertainment to the viewer with its well staged scenes such as the "Walk of Shame" and Michael Biehn's fans of his ruthless character of Johnny Ringo in "Tombstone" should check his vileness here.

Curiously, this was the first movie of a group of actors who would be frequent collaborators for several films in the future like Biehn, Paxton and Rossovich in James Cameron's "The Terminator" & Lewis Teague's "Navy Seals"; Biehn, Paxton and William Hope in Cameron's "Aliens"; Biehn & Paxton in Pan Cosmatos' "Tombstone" and so on...
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Military School
hqfedlegion-130 January 2007
I can talk about military school as I was third generation to attend a military school; my father and grandfather attended the same school. And I wanted to go; to escape from the small town syndrome. They wanted to shoot "Taps" there, but we turned it down as, our president at the time, a retired 2 star general said, "It portrayed the military school student as a radical." Gee secret groups are bad. So public groups like gangs are forgotten? Any organization will have good and bad in it. At the military school we had Black, Whites, Asian, Mexican, etc. The only color that mattered were the black, gray and blue of your uniform. Time there mattered. If you were a new boy, (1 year of less) you were the lowest form of life, no matter what color you were. Old Boys, +1 year and who had signed our honor code, were the upper level. It didn't matter what color or how old. And when women started there, some of the older alumni had problems with that. But I am here to tell you, in the final years of life of that school (which was shut down to mis-management and money... gee always money) the female company was the best there. the military school, when I attended 1977-1983, was a great way to prepare young people for the future-be it in the military or in life. Anyone who say different, well... I won't say what I think. If you didn't go to a military school, you don't know. Just like being in the military. I am proud that I attended and still have more friends from than I can count from there, over 30 years later. How many can say that about the school you went to?

numquam non paratus
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lousy adaptation of perhaps the greatest book in the English language.
Nomad-77 August 1999
I saw this movie when it was first released. I have not seen it since. I hated it then. I hated it when I saw it today.

I don't know why I should have expected more. It would be impossible to put any of the music or poetry in Conroy's prose into a 2 hour movie script. It was a crime to even try.

The only good thing about seeing this movie again was seeing Michael Biehn before The Terminator, a nascent Judge Reinhold, Robert Prosky and a couple others as they were almost 20 years ago. There was nothing technically wrong with the movie, but it shared nothing with the book but its title and a couple of the character's names. Lousy adaptation.
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Fine Adaptation of Pat Conroy's Best Novel
leftbanker-129 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This was bay far Conroy's best novel and also the best movie adaptation of his work. It's a tight little thriller with the enchanting backdrop of Charleston, South Carolina. I made a pilgrimage to most of the places in his books, places he describes with such passion and clarity in his novels. Of course, The Citadel wouldn't allow the movie to be made at the school so they filmed Lords at the Virginia Military Institute. I can only imagine that these are horrible places to go to school.

The film is fast-paced and tells a compelling story of friendship, honor, and betrayal. The whole sadistic hazing bull is still a big part of military training but for what reason no one really seems to know. Treating people like animals and heaping abuse on people in training only serves to make petty and angry idiots, not leaders. I went to school when I was in the military with some West Points grads and they were the worst officers that I encountered in all of my service. I think the book and this film point this out.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Gays okay. Blacks bad. Paxton mediocre.
idontneedyourjunk29 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I haven't read the book, but it has a rating of 4.27/5 from over 20,000 ratings (Pat Conroy), so I'm going to presume it's pretty good.

The movie? Not so much.

Set in the 60's, it follows a 4th year cadet through training (specifically hazing) who is given the job of looking out for the first black cadet allowed into the institute.

He completely fails to do so, finds out there's a secret group forcing out people they don't like through torture (the first 70 minutes). He reads a diary that helpfully lists all the members of the last 30 years and blackmails all his problems away (the last 20 minutes). Oh, and his best friend betrays him. The end.

"Wild" Bill Paxton (as credited) is as mediocre as the movie, so at least he fits in? He appears with Judge Reinhold, who was in his last movie (Stripes), and first time appearing with Michael Biehn, who was the best soldier actor in the movie. Someone must have agreed, because the following year, he got the role of Kyle Reece in The Terminator (Bill would get a bit part, as would Rick Rossovich).

Filming took place in London, and Bill Paxton met his future (and second) wife Louise Newbury on a #37 bus there.

TLDR; what a stupid movie.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It's all about the HONOR...
CDRDerek29 August 2004
The armed services of the U.S. have spent years trying to define and instill the core values that they wish the Soldier, Sailor, Airman, Marine, and Coast Guardsman to possess. The military realizes that not many people have learned those core values from their home life. Induction into the service is a metamorphosis into a new life and it involves making over the former civilian into the servicemember -- body and mind. In this excellent fictional movie, the Commandant and his "Ten" lost track of the distinction between pride in their accomplishments and...elitism. Will and The Bear had honor. Will's moral courage exemplified the core values that the military strives to teach its members today.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely Wretched
afrances14 December 1999
It's a shame that the greatest book of all time turned out to be the worst movie...The acting was horrible, they took out major plot lines from the book (Will falling in love) and in general ruined just about everything...I feel sorry for Pat Conroy.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed