Prisoners of the Lost Universe (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
44 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Prisoners of Love
juliankennedy2326 April 2017
Prisoners of the Lost Universe: Science transports a mad scientist, a handyman, and a go get um TV reporter to "The Lost Universe" which turns out to be South African renaissance festival run by John Saxon.

On the plus side, this is no Frankenstein Island. There is some decent acting with actually appealing actors. Richard Hatch was always underutilized but certainly is appealing here. John Saxon is in full John Saxon mode and plays his evil character halfway between Donald Pleasance and Kurtwood Smith. As others certainly have pointed out the real find is Kay Lenz. Well find is a bit of a stretch. She played a hippy chick intertwined with William Holden in the Clint Eastwood lensed Breezy. Having recently watched that film for the first time it is well worth the look and she is fantastic in it. She was nominated for a Golden Globe for her performance (Best New Actress nominee). Kay Lenz is fantastic in her role with great chemistry with Richard Hatch and a sense of spunky fun.

The movie also has some decent ideas wrapped up with some on the spot dialogue. So why am I watching this movie with a Rifftrax soundtrack and comparing it to Frankenstein Island? Well…. Did I mentioned it was filmed in South Africa… in the early Eighties… and they used their entire budget for top name stars like Richard Hatch? Yes, this one had potential but everything else is a pure train wreck. You can't make Lord of the Rings on a 100k budget. It is a combination of LARPers gone wrong and some of the worst, yet strangely creative costumes and makeup ever seen. You have giants, midgets, green people… and sets that would make 60's Star Trek blush.

It's all in good fun and the stars mentioned above make most of this more palatable than it should be. For those times even the charms of Richard Hatch or John Saxon cannot win one over I had the soothing jokes of Rifftrax to see me through. An okay time but don't be surprised if you are confused after fifteen minutes and asleep after forty-five.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dumb but Watchable
arfdawg-125 February 2017
The Plot.

Through a series of coincidences, Carrie, Dan and Dr. Hartmann all fall through a teleporter device Hartmann has invented.

Transported to a what appears to be a prehistoric world in a parallel universe and unable to find the Doctor, Dan and Carrie must figure out a way to get back home.

Before they can do that, however, they must deal with tribes of savage cavemen, as well as brutal warlord named Kleel who has taken a liking to Carrie and seems to be unusually well-supplied with Earth technology.

This is not a horrible movie.

The acting is good and the directing is suitable.

It's easy to watch and you can space out here and there without losing the plot.

It's set in LA but all the cars have their steering wheels on the right side because this was filmed in South Africa where tehy drive the English way.

The movie can't be taken too seriously and frankly I think it was made more as a comedy with sci fi elements rather than in the reverse.

The special effects are horrible. It has the look of Flesh Gordon. Too bad Kay Lenz didn't do some porn in her day.

I liked the movie. It was fun and different. Nothing to write home about but good for a lazy rainy day
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Post-Battlestar Blues
Darkweasel15 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The year is 1983. Battlestar Galactica has finished and Richard Hatch is out of work...

"I'll take anything", says Richard, running nervous fingers through his famously luxuriant dark hair, trying to remain in control of his emotions but exuding more than the merest whiff of desperation from his once proud figure. His agent smiles apologetically before stammering his way through the sentence which will ultimately cost him his job. "I, er... have this for you, Richard". He stops for a moment to dab at his forehead with a handkerchief already damp from nervous sweat. "It's called 'Prisoners of the Last, sorry... Lost Universe'. What do you think"? The haggard looking former TV star looks sorrowfully at the script, remembering the good old days of brown uniforms, Dirk Benedict, kissing Jane Seymour, and evading Cylon Centurions blasting him with lasers. Then, after recollecting the state of his dwindling finances, he swallows, closes his eyes and says, "I'll do it. God help me, I'll do it".

And that is how Prisoners of the Lost Universe came to pass (with John Saxon having virtually the same conversation with his soon-to-be- fired agent as well). Probably.

Hatch and cheap Farrah Fawcett-alike Kay Lenz disappear through a mad scientist's inter-dimensional gate into a parallel universe (which isn't all that parallel really) inhabited by mute giants, a green native American (sorry, native Vanyan) a cheery Irish/Scottish/English (depending on whichever line he's speaking at the time) thief, giant gold warriors, megalomaniacal overlords who laugh evilly at everything, and some small, but very angry, stripy pygmies wearing owl masks with flashing red eyes.

Bad actors act badly, bad lines are spoken badly, bad visual effects are used badly (and have not aged at all well), comedy sound effects are employed with completely non-hilarious results and awful bad guys get their painfully convoluted come-uppances. The music score demands special attention, being part Superman, part Shaft. Quite the combination, I can tell you.

A truly terrible film with only one question hanging over it. Why, if it was so utterly awful, did I want to watch it all over again the moment it ended?

If there was a way to vote 0/10 & 10/10 at the same time, I'd do that. Instead, I'll split the difference and give it 5.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
4 stars out of 10 - all of them for Kay Lenz
gridoon10 January 2007
This stereotypical, low-grade fantasy lacks both the budget and the directorial imagination to be really exciting. The only epic thing about it is the music score. The film is too cheesy for most adults, but it also has some unpleasant scenes that are unsuitable for kids - making you wonder what audience exactly they had in mind. What kept me watching it is Kay Lenz: she's both endearing and feisty, and she looks particularly sexy when she's angry. Her face has a great "bone structure" - she looks a bit like Kim Basinger (trivia note: they were born the same year, 1953), only more beautiful. And she can even keep a straight face through lines like "But....he's green!" (when the male lead suggests that they should follow a man). Take Lenz out of the movie and you don't have a movie - just a midget, a giant, an evil John Saxon, and other stereotypes. (*1/2)
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Only The Dead Know Their Way Out!"...
azathothpwiggins30 May 2022
PRISONERS OF THE LOST UNIVERSE is a fun, rollicking sci-fi adventure. It's also total nonsense. In a good way.

Carrie and Dan (Kay Lenz and Richard Hatch) are two strangers thrown together, just in time to travel to a parallel universe via a scientist's wonky machine. Once there, the trio (yes, the scientist tags along) encounters a sadistic warlord named Kleel (John Saxon) who, with the help of his army of shirtless male models, seeks to dominate the multiverse.

THIS MOVIE CONTAINS: Roaring, bug-eyed natives! An enormous caveman! A resourceful green dude! Lots of chances for Ms. Lenz to run around in peril!

If you enjoy heaping helpings of gooey cheeeze, then this is paradise found!...
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Small budget, campy fantasy.
tomimt19 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
There's this silly scientist (Kenneth Hendel), you see, who has managed to create a machine, a Material Transmitter, which can, well, transmit stuff into a parallel universe. And then there's this female reporter (Kay Lentz), see, who's gonna do a report of the man and then there's this ken-do fighting cable guy (Richard Hatc), who because of an accident gets hooked up in this and they all are like sent into a parallel universe. And in the parallel universe there's some green dude (Ray Charleson), a giant (Larry Taylor), an annoying little thief (Peter O'Farrell) and this, like, evil warlord (John Saxon). And guess who's gonna get napped by the warlord and who is gonna do inventions for him. And who's gonna safe the day.

Prisoners Of The Lost Universe is my first camp movie love. When I was a kid I must have watched it dozens of times, even tough it is flat out silly film, whit poor settings and obviously small effect budget. That is the reason I am a bit too generous with my score.

POTLU isn't nothing more, than a low budget action/sci-fi/fantasy flick, which, if you are into this kind of films, will make a grin on your face just because it is, what it is. And, at least in the first viewing, you can't help but to applaud for the inner logic of the story and the world. A pod gun. Black and white red eyes pygmies, hot stone worshipers and much, much more.

In a word, if you are watching this film, you most likely are into low budget camp films, and thus can appreciate this film for what it is.

Score: 4 of 10, Camp Score: 7 of 10
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mildly Diverting Camp Nonsense
Theo Robertson16 June 2013
The production team behind this sword and sorcery movie come with a fair amount of baggage . Director Terry Marcel and producer Harry Robertson had previously made HAWK THE SLAYER a film so bad that it almost attracted a cult following , almost . Certainly HAWK is a memorable film but not in any good way and Marcel and Robertson continue in the same vein here

PRISONERS OF THE LOST UNIVERSE is another sword and sorcery film where modern day protagonists from the 20th Century , a TV presenter called Carrie and a truck driver called Dan find themselves transported to an alternative universe that sees different medieval tribes warring against one another with the upper hand being held by a tyrant called Kleel

If the above makes you fear you're going to be watching a nonsensical movie then you'd be right . That said it's also a movie that doesn't take itself entirely serious . I was somewhat surprised as to how involving some of the film is and didn't find myself continually wishing for it to finish despite never once thinking it was ever in danger of being a good movie . In some ways it also reminded me of the TV show THE 10TH KINGDOM that might have very well be inspired by this camp movie
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Formula Sword and Bordom Epicissimo.
junk-monkey17 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The Story: Feisty girl reporter - aren't they all? - goes to interview a 'mad scientist' who has built a matter transmitter that will enable him to send objects to another dimension. Sidestepping the normal peer review publications he has decided to announce his discovery via a cheesy popular science TV show. On the way to meet him she has a near collision with another car during an earthquake. The other car is driven by a hunky handyman Kendo champion. They instantly dislike each other in the way only people destined to be at it like bunnies by the second act can dislike each other. She continues on to her appointment and meets the scientist. We know he's a scientist because he's wearing a white lab coat - even at home. He demonstrates the matter transmitter using her powder compact and, during another earthquake, manages to transmit himself to the other dimension. The handyman arrives at the house wanting to use the phone and both he and the girl get zapped through to - who knows where.

She finds herself alone in an alien landscape - which looks like Spain but isn't Spain because there are 'alien plants' in the foreground of every shot. She rescues an incoherent giant from quicksand before being attacked by midgets with glowing eyes. The handyman appears and they flee, only to fall over a cliff and be rescued by the giant. (The giant tosses the midgets off the cliff, and as they fall past there is a cartoony falling noise plonked on the soundtrack. Just like the descending in pitch, falling noises that accompanied Coyote on all his canyon plunges in the Roadrunner cartoons. From this we get the first (and only) clue that this movie is supposed to be FUNNY). The plucky twosome get back to the top of the cliff and untie a green man who the midgets had held captive. he leads them to safety but buggers off after rescuing the girl from a 'Waterbeast' while she is skinny dipping. Boy and girl realise they are the leads in the movie and start to kiss before a fade reveals the girl lying in post-coital slumber. He's wandered off for a shave. Local warlord John Saxon arrives with his henchmen and makes off with the girl, leaving the boy for dead after shooting him.

An annoying little twerp comic relief who we loath within minutes but detest by the end of the movie tries to rob the dead body of the boy but - he's not dead after all!... The pair go to buy some horses and rescue the Green man from drunken yahoos.

Meanwhile the girl has discovered the Warlord gets his power (and his guns) from a Sorcerer who is the mad scientist from the start of the movie doing a Wizard of Oz - but with more dead bodies - as if we didn't see that coming from fifteen minutes in. Amazingly he is still wearing his lab coat which has remained incredibly white after a year in a medieval society. He is about to supply the Warlord with nitroglycerin...

After that it's all running through insanely well-lit cave systems fighting off hoards of stunt men without receiving so much as a scratch, running up and down about twenty feet of impregnable fortress corridor again and again passing the same four props endlessly rearranged, and taking it in turns to rescue each other over and over again, until all the bad guys are blown to hamburger and our motley band of heroes are safe.

At which point hero and heroine find her long lost powder compact and for some totally unexplained reason vanish leaving the scientist stranded - presumably they have come back to our own world, but who knows. Maybe they were hoping for a sequel. (Now that IS funny!)

This is hopelessly derivative low rent stuff. Not bad enough to be funny and too dull to be good. Go watch Krull.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
John Saxon as MC Hammer
bensonmum227 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Prisoners of the Lost Universe is a remarkably underwhelming fantasy/adventure film that offer very little in the way of thrills or excitement. A brief plot synopsis: A couple is accidentally transmitted to an alternate reality and quickly become separated. The woman, Carrie (Kay Lenz), has been taken prisoner by a vicious warlord named Kleel (John Saxon). Her new beau, Dan (Richard Hatch), with the help of a ragtag band of misfits, sets out to free Carrie and find a way home.

I'm not sure how many South African made movies I've actually seen so I can only hope that this isn't an example of that country's film industry. Prisoners of the Lost Universe plays a bit like a cross between one of those cheap sword and sorcerer movies so popular in the 1980s and something like Romancing the Stone with a bit of cross-dimensional time-travel thrown in for good measure. None of it works, mainly because the whole plot is terribly tired and has that "been there, done that" feel to most of it. The quirky characters that pop-up throughout the movie aren't interesting enough to care about. And the relationship between the two main characters, Carrie and Dan, is handled in such a ham-fisted and forced manner that it provides nothing in the way of a spark for the movie. The relationship between the two main characters exists only because in these kinds of movies there is always a relationship between the two main characters. The lone bright spot for me was John Saxon. His over-acting in every scene, even when doing nothing but lying on a bed, was a joy to behold. However, I could have done without the orange MC Hammer-inspired pants he wore during much of the movie. In the end, this one's a real dud. A 3/10 from me.

One last note - I knew I was in trouble right from the start when I noticed that both of the vehicles the main characters were driving had right side steering wheels. This wouldn't be so unusual, but they were supposed to be in California.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Down the Hatch!
wes-connors28 June 2008
"A scientist has developed a matter transmitter that he is able to demonstrate for two people, when an earthquake occurs, disrupting the test and plunging the trio into a parallel universe. The trio must adjust to the strange new world, where medieval weaponry is mixed with modern technology, all the while trying to find a way to travel back home. The scientist becomes separated from the young couple and they attempt to find him, all the while a warlord is trying to stop them, so he can take the young woman for his own," according to the DVD sleeve's synopsis.

Richard Hatch (as Dan) and Kay Lenz (as Carrie) are both athletic and attractive, in this vapid and vacuous parallel universe adventure. In Terry Marcel's "Prisoners of the Lost Universe", Mr. Hatch and Ms. Lenz get to say naughtier words than they said on episodic television; and, of course, they banter before falling in love. The strange universe looks exactly like our Earth; however, it populated with amusingly costumed and made-up actors. It looks like it should have been a lot more fun.

** Prisoners of the Lost Universe (1983) Terry Marcel ~ Richard Hatch, Kay Lenz, John Saxon
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Somewhere over the rainbow … There's an earthquake-activated alternate dimension
Coventry16 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Simply labeling "Prisoners of the Lost Universe" as a fun bad movie just doesn't cover it. This is another one of these rare discoveries where you can laugh non-stop, from start until finish, with all the ineptitude in the script as well as the lousy special effects and flamboyant characters. Last time I had so much fun watching a bad B- movie was with either "Wizards of the Lost Kingdom" or "The Puma Man"; both of them obscure and righteously long-forgotten early 80's Sci-Fi fantasy amalgamations as well. All these movies were desperately trying to cash in on all the numerous contemporary popular movie franchises and TV-shows, like "Star Wars" and "Battlestar Gallactica" but usually ended up on the lowest shelves of raunchy video stores or straight on cable TV. Right from the "Star Wars"-styled title sequence and complementary stolen theme music, you just know "Prisoners of the Lost Universe" will become a real and authentic exploitation beauty!

The incompetence of the script is immediately noticeable when the characters, who are supposed to be living and working in California USA, are introduced whilst driving cars with the steering wheel at the right side! I know the movie was shot in South Africa, but writer/director Terry Marcel could at least have tried to find two authentic American or European cars with the wheel on the left side? Then, they go and meet a scientist who created a device that can teleport human DNA to other parallel dimensions. Pretty genius, of course, but stupidly enough he made his machine a little too sensitive and even the smallest earthquake – and they occur quite frequently in California – makes the thing go off. This is what happens to a babbling TV-hostess and a nagging plumber when they, following a series of banal circumstances, end up at the scientist's mansion. They arrive in an alternate dimension where every minute lasts several hours. The dimension also homes a whole assemblage of funky humanoids and eccentric monsters, either good (like the green man and the humble man-beast) or bad (like the hateful warlord Kleel). So basically, once inside the parallel dimension, "Prisoners of the Lost Universe" actually becomes quite reminiscent to Dorothy's dreamy journey in "The Wizard of Oz". With his girlfriend Carrie kidnapped by Kleel, Dan teams up with three eccentric locals to go and rescue her. Their voyage is full of obstacles and dangerous ordeals, but love & friendship conquers everything … or something like that!

Most of the stuff going on in "Prisoners of the Lost Universe" is just too ridiculous for words and/or doesn't make a lick of sense. There's something new and thoroughly stupid getting introduced every 30 seconds, like little Martian-type creatures with flashing red eyes or a gold- painted giant spontaneously combusting when he touches a fiery rock! John Saxon, who sometimes gives the impression of being embarrassed for starring in yet another lousy Z-grade movie, depicts the ultimately evil SOB. He's a greedy and power-obsessed tyrant who beats women and joyfully goes around blasting away his own henchmen with a self-made shotgun. He's easily the best thing about this whole movie, although Kay Lenz (a fairly unknown Kim Basinger look-alike) and Richard Hatch (Captain Apollo from "Battlestar Gallactica") aren't too bad either. In spite of the really lousy sound and make-up effects, the tone and suggested violence of the film are often quite harsh and there even are a couple of bloody and grim swashbuckling fights. What else you need to know ... ? Oh yeah, movies such as this usually feature an annoying midget who provides the comic relief and a gigantic Chewbacca type of pet animal. In the case of this piece of junk it's even a kleptomaniac midget and a Man-Beast who talks almost as incomprehensibly as Chewbacca. There are zombies too and, I swear, John Saxon is at his sexiest when he plays a villainous character with whiskers! What are you waiting for? You're off to see "Prisoners of the Lost Universe"
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
If you appreciate movies for what they are, you'll really like this
docdoolittle1 January 2014
I've now watched this movie twice. The first time I stumbled across it in one of those packs of DVDs that has 50 obscure movies you've never heard of. I went in fully intending to mock it throughout. I was pretty happy early on watching the main characters all come together. Then as the movie progressed, I realized there was a real plot, and some well thought out ideas. There are colorful characters, and some pretty interesting ideas in this thing. I also have an appreciation for the strong female lead in this movie. It's very welcome.

When you absorb it all, you have to allow for low budget, sometimes odd dialogue, and occasionally slow pacing. If you look at the variety of characters, follow their travels and enjoy the campiness that is built in, you should have a good time. This is an earnest movie throughout, and I love it for that. I have no doubt I'll watch it again in the future.

The story involves (although you may have read this already) a scientist, a reporter, and a guy who just happened to be in the neighborhood. Through a series of events, they all wind up in another dimension. The goal is simple. Find out if there is a way to get home, and if so, go for it. This movie is the tale of their adventures. Aside from some language, it's definitely family friendly. The violence is modest by todays standards and mostly consists of swordplay. Pop in that DVD and enjoy. You'll be glad you did!
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
High fun, low budget
imprator1 June 2009
This is by no stretch of the imagination a good movie. It is incredibly low-budget, and that leaves the OK(ish) acting badly exposed. That said, I thoroughly loved it!

To enjoy this movie you really have to be able to overlook the low budget. The "effects" are bad. Really bad. The alien dimension is an exact replica of Earth. The sets could come straight from a spaghetti western (perhaps they did). The "monsters" are people in mild fancy dress. The fight scenes are amateurish, and made more "exciting" by running the film faster. A three year old child could spot it without even trying. However, if you can accept the shortfalls for what they are – the result of an extremely low budget and an overreaching ambition – and allow yourself to ride with the tide, you will enjoy this film.

The saving graces come in the form of a fun script and Kay Lenz.

The script is not magnificently written, but the dialogue is fun and counterpoints many amusing incidents in the storyline. I won't highlight any incidents as I want this post to remain spoiler-free. However, if you relax into this movie and roll with it you will discover them for yourself when you find yourself laughing out loud – and you will perhaps be surprised that you are laughing with the movie, not at it.

Kay Lenz is also fun. If you like your heroines good looking and feminine but sparky, you will love her character. Having a female lead character in a film who looks like this, and is possessed of intelligence and verve, will always add a certain frisson for many male viewers.

I always find that one of the marks of a movie that has been particularly enjoyable is that at the ending I am surprised that so much time has passed whilst I was watching. This film met that criterion. It is refreshing to find this in a low-budget movie after sitting through some Hollywood blockbuster or other wondering how much longer it will be before the interminable film ends.

If you want to watch a fun bubblegum movie, and you are willing and able to overlook a budget so low that it hits you in the face thirty times per minute of running time, take a look at this film. You will have fun.
35 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I guess the flannel shirt just bugged me...
goriddle19 December 2002
Normally I like modestly budgeted sword movies regardless, but something bothered me about this one. I'm pretty sure it was the flannel shirt. It might even be that I think that battlestar galactica guy is a dork. There were a few really good monsters in this movie. The pygmies with light up eyes were definitely original. The fighting sequences are well planned, but the explanation of why the hero knew how to use a sword really bothered me. Come on! a rustic handyman (or whatever he is supposed to be) that practices kendo? I didn't buy it. The abrupt ending to this movie also bother me. I rated it 5 because I don't think it deserves less, but it was a tad boring.
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Surprise
saccenti31 August 2001
First, I can't imagine this can even be found anymore. I saw it one time, in the mid 80s when I was a kid, on T.V. I think it was orginally made for cable. Anyway, my expectations were zero, and instead I enjoyed a great "bad" movie, if you know what I mean. Fun way to spend an afternoon. Why do I even remember it? Because it is so obscure, it is one of those movies I use to test whether a film book (like Maltin) is really comprehensive. Glad to find it on imdb.com.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A crap made-for-cable-TV sci-fi/fantasy.
BA_Harrison12 April 2020
In countries other than the United States, made for cable sci-fi/fantasy Prisoners of the Lost Universe was released theatrically, meaning that people actually queued for and paid cash to see it - I can only imagine the level of disappointment felt whist watching this on the big screen. It was bad enough watching it for 'free' on Amazon Prime.

Kay Lenz plays Carrie, presenter of a science TV show for kids, who pays a visit to scientist Dr. Hartmann (Kenneth Hendel), inventor of a device that can transport matter to parallel worlds. While demonstrating the machine, an earth tremor causes Dr. Hartman to fall into the its beam, sending him to a savage land ruled over by barbarian tyrant Kleel (John Saxon).

Another tremor soon after results in plumber Dan (Richard Hatch) also being transported across dimensions, followed seconds later by Carrie. Temporal displacement between the two worlds means that Carrie turns up a week after Dan, and that approximately a year has passed since the scientist arrived. After exploring the new land, Carrie is eventually reunited with Dan, and together they set out to try and find Hartmann, their only chance of getting back home.

Along the way, Dan and Carrie befriend several other strange characters - a troglodyte, a green man, a thief - who aid them on their quest, but they also find themselves faced with a variety of perils, including hostile creatures with glowing red eyes, a water beast, vicious cave dwellers, tribesmen who worship a fire stone, and, of course, Kleel and his followers.

This all sounds like it's aimed at a younger audience - and it's almost a certainty that most adults will find it extremely banal - but a few bloody sword fights and a couple of attempted rapes mean that it's not really suitable for the kids. At the very least, I had hoped for a few shonky stop-motion monsters to liven things up, but all of the 'creatures' are just men in bad make-up and crap costumes. The writing is terrible, the acting is pretty bad all round (Saxon seems to have lowered his standards to suit the quality of production), and the low, low budget results in unconvincing sets, cheap props, and poor special effects.

An extremely dumb ending sees Dan and Carrie finding a portal to take them back home, despite Hartmann claiming the odds of doing so to be 10 million to one against.

2/10. As early '80s fantasy flicks go, this has got to be one of the worst.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A waste of film
caspian197817 October 2000
You will not find this film available in any big name video store. The reason being, nobody wants to see it. The best part of the film was the end. And I don't mean the ending...I mean the film ending was the best part.

The money spent on this film could have fed a small village in Africa for months. Instead, we are faced with this disaster of a film.

Like Galactica 1980, Prisoners of the Lost Universe remain one of the worst pieces of science fiction.
8 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Prisoners to this lost cause of a movie
Chase_Witherspoon9 March 2012
Hokey sci-fi fantasy concerns a dimension transporter inadvertently sending three individuals (Lenz, Hatch and the contraption's inventor, Hendel) into a parallel universe where the evil Kleel (Saxon) is a reigning warlord whose justice is "harsh but just", raping and pillaging throughout the countryside that includes green men, water-beasts, fire rocks and other assorted weirdos.

Hatch is an affable leading man, here given sword-fighting ability against the chauvinistic Kleel character, played tongue-in-cheek by Saxon as he wields his will across the land. Kay Lenz is feisty and attractive, while Peter O'Farrell gets most of the scarce intentional laughs as a diminutive thief. The action and special effects are handled primitively, and there's a child-like quality to the film in spite of some sadistic violence and mild gore.

Difficult to pitch as a comedy (particularly as most of the jokes fall flat), and not serious enough to be a straight sci-fi fantasy, it's a curious film that makes little sense and offers only light, sporadic entertainment. Saxon delivers some mildly amusing dialogue ("Kleel's law is just.., odd, but just"), but it's not witty enough to attract cult status, and the climax is rushed (looks like a proper ending couldn't be conceived) leaving the overall film, immensely unsatisfying.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The biggest obstacle the film needed to overcome was the poor dialog...and it was just too much to overcome.
planktonrules9 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Richard Hatch and Kay Lenz star in this very low-budget sci-fi film. It all begins when each of them are accidentally sent into a parallel Earth by a machine constructed by a wacky scientist. This alternate dimension Earth is a weird amalgam of both medieval sort of weapons and more modern ones. While this doesn't make sense, I guess you can do this when you are dealing with such places. Soon after arriving, the pair are attacked repeatedly as this isn't an especially friendly world. Kay is taken prisoner by a sex-crazed leader of a band of brigands (John Saxon...and how do you like the use of the word 'brigands'?). Hatch falls in with a somewhat friendlier sort of crowd --but that isn't saying much. Our studly hero, Richard, escapes these folks after he proves his manliness in a fight that is pretty terribly choreographed. Can he navigate through this overly-macho and bombastic world, save the girl and return with her back to our Earth...all before the 94 minutes are complete?

The idea of parallel worlds isn't bad at all. However, the film really looked like it was made with practically no budget. The aliens are, at times laughable (like the guys with the red glowing eyes). The sound effects occasionally odd (the 'funny' sound when the glowing-eyed creatures fell to their deaths was just weird). The script lacks wit and charm and much of the dialog is truly dreadful. For example, at one point Lenz is whining and Saxon slaps her--and you WANT him to hit her again because the dialog she was given was just dreadful! As for the actors, none of them are particularly good--and I am sure the dialog and plot didn't help any. Saxon got the worst of it, as his character was rather cartoon-like. But, at least he ("Planet Earth") and Hatch ("Battlestar Gallactica") had some prior experience in low-budget sci-fi--so they probably felt at home in this rather silly film. As for Lenz, when I saw her I just thought she was Shelley Hack--they look so much alike.

So should you see this film? Probably not. It isn't that bad--so you can't see it for its unintended laugh value. But it also just isn't very good. The only reason you might want to see it is simply to watch Saxon in his very odd performance as a very difficult to forget character!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Through a Lenz Darkly
Hitchcoc10 April 2007
This is so forgettable. I know that if one were to dig, he could find some kind of clever sci fi in this. It's just so darn dull. The characters are caricatures. They are entirely tongue in cheek. That's find when you have a solid jumping off point. To get to the yucks, you have to wade through so much uninspiring dialogue. Many have said they thought Kay Lenz could carry things. As a Hollywood beauty, she is passable. She is an actress from a time of really forgettable actresses. They would pop up on TV shows and then disappear. Unfortunately, she isn't that great, at least I see nothing that separates her. Also, the events that pop up are uninteresting and we aren't part of the joke. Don't bother with this.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dorky Sci-Fi Comedy
Rainey-Dawn29 October 2015
A film I acquired in the Mill Creek Dive-in 50-pack. Prisoners of the Lost Universe is basically a dorky action, adventure, sci-fi comedy. It's got a couple of giggles and a terrible story.

This one is below B-grade with most of the actors - only a couple of them are OK. Most of them are pretty lame at acting even for a comedy.

Basically 3 people are teleported to a parallel reality where barbarians and martial artists are abound. There are a few strange alien-like creatures. Can the 3 of them save the people in the parallel reality and get back to their own universe? The film is an OK sci-fi adventure overall. It's not good but it does have it's moments. Not a film worth seeking out but not a bad film to watch.

2/10
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Drab and Uninteresting
Uriah4324 June 2014
By accident a scientist by the name of "Dr. Hartman" (Kenneth Hendel), a young television reporter known as "Carrie Madison" (Kay Lenz) and a maintenance man named "Dan" (Richard Hatch) find themselves transported to "a strange and violent land" existing in another dimension. Once there they encounter a number of hostile people and creatures in a desperate struggle to survive. Anyway, so much for the plot. As far as the movie is concerned it pretty much featured one ridiculous "comic book" scenario after another filled with corny dialogue, bad acting, cheap costumes and ludicrous characters. It was pretty bad. As a matter of fact, about the only thing worth mentioning was the presence of Dawn Abraham ("Shareen") and the aforementioned Kay Lenz who at least added some nice scenery to an otherwise totally wasted effort. In summation, my strong recommendation is that you spare yourself from wasting an hour and a half on this drab and uninteresting film. You will be doing yourself a huge favor.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A good sci-fi film!
Movie Nuttball3 February 2003
This film is very different sci-fi/fantasy film that has good action scenes and some very unique but original characters. Kay Lenz is so good looking! She looked great in this movie and she acted good too! John Saxon put on powerful performance. I really liked his character. Richard Hatch was good as well. If you can find this different film some where pick it up and I don't think you'll be disappointed.
20 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Highly enjoyable escapist action fantasy
HaemovoreRex10 February 2007
Ostensible shades of a Hawk The Slayer reunion are evidenced here with two of that films main protagonists (Peter O'Farrell and Ray Charleson) present here in very similar roles to that which they portrayed in the aforementioned movie. In fact the film reviewed here bears more than a passing resemblance to the said glorious classic in many ways (a compliment indeed!)

The plot concerns a revolutionary scientist who develops an amazing device which can transport matter to another dimension. Predictably matters take a turn for the worse when himself, a female TV presenter and a handy man/kendo champion(!) accidentally fall into the device and inevitably end up stranded in an unforgiving parallel world ruled by a sadistic despot named Kleel (the always excellent John Saxon)

It turns out to be a highly enjoyable ride throughout boasting some great action set pieces including some very well staged battles wherein our hero, played by Richard 'Apollo' Hatch, demonstrates some highly nifty sword work!

Great fun from start to finish and can be enjoyed by all. It's just such a shame that films like this are so rarely made nowadays.
32 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
So silly it's just a bit of fun
chris_green198120 September 2021
Very poor effects, clunky, ott acting, plot goes everywhere. I'd be lying though if I pretended it wasn't a bit of light hearted fun. If your after some 80s cheese... give it a go. However some of the gender politics are very much of the era and a little problematic in my opinion.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed