Invitation to the Wedding (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not afraid to admit that I liked it!
azrael99559 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I first saw this movie when I had a trial subscription to Showtime, and a brand new VCR, and I recorded it in VHS. I really enjoyed it, and have watched it many times since (until the VHS tape gave up the ghost). It IS a feel-good, ridiculously romantic comedy, very much enhanced by the bit performances of Gielgud and Richardson, especially his interactions with his pet rat that runs free inside the family chapel ("Ratty Old Fellow"). The lawyers' scenes make the movie worth watching as well. And the girl is ethereal. Acting ability be hanged. This movie, among several others, kept me sane while attempting to cope with my divorce several years ago. If Sleepless In Seattle moved you, give this one a try.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Two Acting Knights Hold Up The Film
bkoganbing3 November 2009
Invitation To The Wedding is the last film of Sir Ralph Richardson who plays a somewhat dotty old bishop who accidentally marries his grand niece to a visiting American who was just standing in for the groom at a wedding rehearsal. It was released two years after Richardson had died and it also features that other classical acting knight, Sir John Gielgud as well.

It was a family joke that Richardson had married a butler to a member of the royal Danish house under similar circumstances. And here the old boy does it again. But apparently Richardson had a sense about these things. Because it turns out that visiting American Paul Nicholas is really falling for bride Susan Brooks and he's got a week to make his case before the real groom Jeremy Clyde returns.

They must do things differently in the United Kingdom because I thought they would have had to have a license first. But that aside the young lovers, allegedly of college age and slightly over are all well into their thirties and even forties. They simply just didn't convince me as young people in love.

John Gielgud was in the film as an Eighties era reverend bring the United Kingdom some of the Billy Graham school of evangelism. I'm not sure what his purpose in the film was other than to be with a valued colleague and friend for a last time. His role was entirely superfluous.

However as a last look at thespian giant Ralph Richardson does deliver a great performance. To bad it had to be in such an ordinary film.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Schmaltzy but satisfying -- a guilty pleasure
wtrojan7 April 2005
Lightweight romantic comedy, but Sir Ralph Richardson's last film and the only movie featuring BOTH Sir John Gielgud and Sir Ralph Richardson. Plus, Susan Brooks is adorable as the girl. I'm usually unaffected by romantic comedy, but I really enjoyed this film when I caught it late night many years ago on a cable channel. An American college student is invited to his rich English roommate's wedding and of course falls in love with the prospective bride. Cleverly written and well-acted. Amazingly, this movie doesn't appear in any of the film reference books, I've seen and it is doubtless not available on home video...
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
For girly horse loving romantics only!
willow-the-redd7 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I have to admit that I haven't seen this film in a while, but I loved it as a teenager. It is very eighties, very sickly sweet, but Paul Nicholas is absolutely gorgeous in it! Not much plot, but some lovely camera work with cracking scenery. Don't watch this with anyone who isn't a true romantic through and through. Have just bought it on DVD from Amazon as I really want to see it again.

The basic plot is: girl is getting married, boy sees girl and falls in love-at-first-sight. Boy spends the run up to the wedding trying to win the heart of the girl, even though she thinks he's an idiot. You can probably guess at the ending. Lots of beautiful countryside, a gorgeous manor house and fabulous horses. The comedy is a bit funny-by-numbers, but it made me laugh anyway. If you fancy a feel-good movie, something to curl up to with a hot chocolate, this is worth the time. Be warned though, I can imagine it has probably dated quite badly.

All in all, a nice way to waste an hour or two.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
avoid
YanivEidelstein14 July 2002
a stale vanity production that should have stayed on the director/co-writer/producer/composer's shelf. this "comedy" doesn't have anything resembling a laugh in all of 90 minutes. the writing is dismal. the whole thing was apparently concocted as a vehicle for susan brooks, obviously a relative of the director (etc etc), who's sweet looking but a non-actress. gielgud hams it up ridiculously with an incoherent "american" accent, and i'm not sure ralph richardson's drunkenness was "simulated". i watched this film so you don't have to.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Invitation to a good night's sleep
grunsel3 February 2004
The ideal viewing time for this movie is around midnight. Insomniacs could rejoice in sleeping soundly after watching just a few minutes of this awful mess . Utterly tedious in all departments you can almost hear wood creaking as notable actors deliver their lines.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed