Rendez-vous (1985) Poster

(1985)

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A very young and vital Juliette Binoche carries this
DennisLittrell2 January 2000
Notice how the jackets of just about every video, especially the French ones, SHOUT how SEXY the movie is. In Krzysztof Kieslowski's "Blue," par example, Juliette Binoche and the film are touted as being so, so sexy. But it wasn't, and neither was she. However in "Rendez- Vous" you will see a Juliette Binoche with enough sexual power to awaken a dead man-not to say that this movie is as good as Kieslowski's "Blue." It isn't, but it's not bad.

Binoche is full of energy as a provincial French girl with a flair for the stage new to the lights of gay Paree. She plays fast and loose (and natural) with the men she meets, and dodges some serious trouble before working it out with the man she really wants. Characteristically, Director André Téchiné leads us close to the dark side of sex without really offending our sensibilities.

Jean-Louis Trintignant appears in a small role that anticipates his triumphant creation as the admiring older man in Kieslowski's "Trois Couleurs: Rouge" nine years later.

(Note: Over 500 of my movie reviews are now available in my book "Cut to the Chaise Lounge or I Can't Believe I Swallowed the Remote!" Get it at Amazon!)
27 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
La Binoche wasn't yet La Binoche
Red-12513 October 2009
Rendez-vous (1985) was co-written and directed by André Téchiné. It's a vehicle for the now-famous Juliette Binoche.

Juliette Binoche, at age 21, already radiated the star power that became apparent to everyone in "The Unbearable Lightness of Being." Unfortunately, her contributions to this film were pretty much limited to her luminous skin and her distinctive beauty. This distinctive beauty is fully and totally displayed. (Binoche is not shy.)

The film involves four men who swirl around Binoche like the proverbial moths around a flame. One is a wimp, one is a creep, and one carries a straight razor. (Don't ask). The fourth is Jean-Louis Trintignant. The other three were all young, and were probably happy to work with a well-known director like Téchiné. One can only guess why an established star like Trintignant accepted this role.

Binoche is lovely, especially when dressed in period costume as Shakespeare's Juliet. (She looks like Vivian Leigh in "Gone with the Wind.") However, she is miscast as the wide-eyed young ingénue from the provincial town of Toulouse. Binoche was born in Paris, and she just can't carry off a role in which she is supposed to have just arrived in town to "live her life." Another weak point is her reading of some of Juliet's lines at an casting audition. No actor could read lines that badly. (High school kids trying out for the senior play don't read lines that badly.)

The movie will work well on DVD, which is the way I saw it. If you love La Binoche, and you've seen every other film in which she's starred, I guess you'll have to see this one for the sake of completion. If you haven't seen all of her later films, rent one of those instead.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Binoche is great, but very offensive toward women
zetes27 March 2011
Lousy, stereotypical and misogynistic, but, hey, if you ever wanted a glimpse of Binoche's binush, this is the film for you! Binoche plays a slutty, fairly talentless actress who meets up with Wadeck Stanczak and invites him to her play, even though she's sleeping and living with one of the ushers. His presence breaks up that convenient relationship and she accompanies Stanczak home. He assumes he's getting laid, but he's too goody-goody for her. Instead, she ends up falling for his complete bastard of a roommate, played by Lambert Wilson. The guy, after seeing her once, attempts to rape her and threatens to kill her. On their next meeting, he threatens to slit his throat in front of her (with the razor he brought with him). This is known in France to be normal behavior, as we all know from their movies. Of course, she'd fall for him, leaving poor sap Stanczak with a rosy palm. The film is unbelievably insulting towards women. Fortunately, Binoche is such a fantastic actress that she almost makes the film worth watching. The character is stereotypical in a lot of ways, but she gives it her all. This was basically her first starring role in what would be (and continues to be) one of the best acting careers in the movies.
10 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Appointment With Sleaze
writers_reign18 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
As far as I'm concerned the French Film Industry is, on the whole, the finest in the world with a history of excellence stretching back to the earliest days of cinema but the downside is the small minority of French film makers with a penchant for slogging through sewers in glass-bottomed boats and here Andre Techine takes his turn at the oars to bring us a story of provincial Nina (Juliette Binoche) who comes to Paris from Toulouse to bed every man she meets - at one point early on she tells the one more or less virtuous man in the film, Paulot (Wadek Stanczak) that she arriving in Paris she hasn't spent one night without a man - whilst ostensibly aspiring to an acting career. She takes up with the brutal Quentin (Lambert Wilson) who works in a sex show and attempts to persuade her to become his partner on stage and from there it more or less not only remains but wallows in the gutter. The acting, especially by Binoche, Wilson and Jean-Louis Trintignant is excellent but once again I must cite Brooks Atkinson and ask if it's possible to draw sweet water from a foul well.
4 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
the starting point of a few beautiful careers
dromasca13 October 2020
When film director André Téchiné made 'Rendez-vous' in 1985, his name was already well known. However, some of his collaborators were anonymous and this film would be a very good launching pad for celebrities. Téchiné offered the lead role and in fact the first consistent role to Juliette Binoche, who at the age of 21 featured in 5 films that year, starting a formidable career. Téchiné's co-writer was Olivier Assayas, in his first screenplay for a feature film, which he wrote in parallel with directing his own debut film. And for Lambert Wilson as well the role here was one of the first important roles, although he had already met with success a year before. Wadeck Stanczak completes the triangle of young actors, also in an important first role, an actor who promised a lot, but whose career has evolved much more disappointingly than those of his famous partners. The film is a psychological thriller set in the world of the young people of Paris in the mid-80s and there are many reasons to be watched with pleasure today, in addition to the film debuts I mentioned.

At the age of 21, Juliette Binoche plays the role of Nina, an 18-year-old girl who comes to Paris to realize her dream of becoming an actress. She manages to get a role in a boulevard comedy, dreaming of big roles while the men around her seem to have no other intentions than to sleep with her. Looking for a reasonably priced apartment, he meets Paulot (Wadeck Stanczak) and Quentin (Lambert Wilson), two young men who are the opposite of each other. The dull clerk Paulot represents mediocre stability, actor Quentin decadent ambition. The triangle throws the girl's life in a whirlwind that mixes passion and ambition, art and pornography, hopes and ghosts of the past.

I usually complain about the length and especially the lengthening of the films when there are not enough artistic or narrative good reasons. In the case of 'Rendez-vous', which only lasts about 80 minutes, I think that an extra 20-30 minutes would have given more psychological depth to the characters and would have allowed the development of some of the themes that are barely suggested in the film. Even so, the characters are well defined and each of the acting creations manages to bring them to life and make us care about them and be curious about their lives beyond what we see on screen. In addition to the trio of young actors, Jean-Louis Trintignant is also cast as a theater director who seems to play a role as a mentor a la 'Pygmalion' for Nina, while hiding dark secrets from the past with repercussions in the lives of the heroes. Shakespeare's Julia becomes a symbol in a film that could have said more about the fascination of theater if it had a little more time to do it. Juliette Binoche is young, beautiful and magnetic, in a role that can get extra-meanings nowadays in the perspective of the fight against the objectification of women. It is one of the reasons, but not the only one, why this foray into the world of Paris in the '80s deserves to be seen and re-seen.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Drenchingly Romantic
beatnik0223 September 2004
RENDEZ-VOUS comes from Téchinés 'romantic' period of the 70s and early 80s, comprising of BAROCCO, LES SOEURS BRONTE and HOTEL DES AMERIQUES. Of these four films RENDEZ-VOUS is without doubt the most worthwhile and successful.

In her first leading role Juliette Binoche is a revelation as Nina a provincial girl who has moved to Paris in order to pursue an acting career. She becomes involved with two vastly different men the gentle Paulo (Wadeck Stanckzac) and the dangerous and intense Quentin (Lambert Wilson).

Unpredictable and provocative this girl bounces between both men. However her whole world falls apart when one of them commits suicide. Cast in a production of Romeo and Juliet by the compelling Scrutzler (Jean Louis Trintignant) this young girl begins to confront her own behaviour and psychology.

Téchiné's brief film is full of themes about female artistic urgency.

Is there anything this girl will do in life that she will not do on stage.

Should there be? What is the dynamic that drives such an ambitious yet lost girl. the film deals superbly with all these ideas without ever resorting to simplae answers. Aided by Binoche's fearless performance the film is incredibly emotional and romantic, helped in no small part by a stunning Phillippe Sarde score.

RENDEZ-VOUS is an intense and at time difficult film, but it is worth every effort to begin to explore this girls psychological motivations.
46 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
well, Binoche had to start somewhere....
oowawa29 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I must confess to a certain prejudice. I've never been to France, and my only experience of the French people is through movies. Consequently, I have been conditioned to love French women and hate French men. This film is a rich tapestry of weak and repulsive characters--particularly the "men." The arrogant egomaniac "Quentin," played by Lambert Wilson, is so sociopathic, annoying, and chauvinistic that when he is flattened by an auto early in the film, I felt like cheering. But alas! He comes back as a ghost, to haunt poor helpless cute little Nina (Binoche), who has been charmed out of her knickers by this abominable and sadistic Romeo. The other "man" that attracts Nina's interest is a wimpy and whiny lovelorn real-estate agent, played by Wadeck Stanczak, whose masculinity is pre-pubescent. Another inexplicable male character is an older "man," a director in the theater, who worships Quentin, even though Quentin-Romeo irresponsibly killed off his own daughter (who was playing Juliet) in a car wreck. This director also sees something very promising in Juliette's abysmal audition to play Juliet in his new production of the play, presumably because she reminds him of his own daughter and is also infatuated somehow with God's gift to the stage, talented Romeo-Quentin.

On the plus side, the film does afford us a fleeting glimpse of "Binoche's binush," (as a previous commenter perceptively observed), and therefore earned the two stars of my rating. To be sure, the "binush" in question looks very much like other binushes the world over, but the fact that it is revealed by one destined for future stardom seems to give it special significance.
9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Early André Téchiné, Early Juliette Binoche
gradyharp2 November 2006
André Téchiné made this 1985 film RENDEZ-VOUS before his promising career was established, giving us such fine films as My Favorite Season, The Innocents, The Wild Reeds, Beach Café, Alice and Martin, etc. The sensitivity to character development is tightly wound in this work but some of the finesse that followed his later works is missing. In the end we are left wondering a bit about what happened to almost everyone.

Nina (Juliette Binoche in her first film role) has traveled to Paris from her small home in Toulouse to try her hand at acting and to live the wild life that has been unavailable to her in Toulouse. She beds nearly every man she encounters and acts bit parts in small theaters, barely eking out an existence. Tired of one night stands and sharing quarters with others, she sets out to find her own apartment, stopping in to a realtors office where she encounters Paulot (Wadeck Stanczak) who is immediately smitten with her sensual good looks and manner. Having no place to stay Nina agrees to spend a few days with Paulot in a flat shared with the hauntingly strange Quentin (Lambert Wilson). Nina is oddly attracted to Quentin and is somewhat put off by the fact that Quentin is an actor in a sex theater. We discover Quentin narrowly escaped death some time back when the actress playing Juliet to his Romeo was killed. Nina has an approach/avoidance conflict with Quentin, all the while fending off offers by the pathetic Paulot to care for her. Quentin is killed in a car accident, Nina meets the elderly director Scrutzler (Jean-Louis Trintignant in a splendid cameo role) who promises her the role of Juliet in his casting of the Shakespeare drama, and her career as an actress seems to be launched. Full of self doubt and fear stimulated by the ghost-like appearances of the dead Quentin, Nina prepares for the role, copes with Paulot's advances, shares a flat with him, and is finally left in the stage wings with her focus on becoming an actress challenged with her needs for physical and stable love. And we are left there.

Juliette Binoche is very fine in this her 'maiden voyage' and it is a happy finding that she is far more beautiful (as well as a far better actress) in her current more mature state. Lambert Wilson gives a fine performance, finding the line between lurid sexuality and lonely afterlife ghost a position he easily treads. The film definitely has moments but it is only a hint (and a strong one) of just what to expect form the gifted André Téchiné. Not bad for a twenty year old film! Grady Harp
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Pointless drivel
robert-temple-113 February 2008
Juliette Binoche was only 21 when she made this film, but it was her eighth film. This is really a pointless, offensive, and ridiculous film for which the director was of course awarded Best Director at Cannes, and Binoche was awarded a Best Actress Cesar (which proves how crazy judges can be, and how perverted they are as well). I imagine Juliette Binoche must be hideously embarrassed to think this terrible film of her cavorting around naked in compromising situations is still available on DVD. It is harder than soft porn, and purely gratuitous in its graphic displays. Binoche was not at all interesting at the age of 21, and all of her fascinating qualities developed later when she began to look like a woman: as a girl, she was seriously dull. I do not mean to say that Binoche did a bad job of acting; on the contrary, she did very well, but why bother? This film is a wet dream fantasy of a sick director of the 'let's get the lead actress's kit off quick' school of thought. Everybody in the film is obsessed with sex, death, and all those really new things none of us has ever thought about, so we need the wacko director to remind us. Why didn't he just make a sexy vampire film and be less affected and pompous? If you want horror, death, and sex, there are always vampires to turn to. Instead, we have here a lot of twaddle about Shakespeare and other mock-profundities. How absurd this all is. Binoche ought to get her kit back on. Really, there was no point in taking it off. On the other hand, there is a Cesar for the mantlepiece, I suppose. But was it worth it? This is a film only for psychotics.
22 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Experiences...
shatguintruo24 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The opening scene of this picture, lead us to two experiences, which we already went through, all of we who travel by train: 1)Looking through the window, one glimpses a station coming near and with it the unknown; 2)or: we hope to retie that we left hanging, be it a friendship relation, business, etc... In this opening scene, the director André Téchiné prepares us to the sparkling show up of a young actress who arrives in Paris searching immediate success. However, her personality must be mold (shape) , like one casts a sword in a forge. The first to take the hammer in front of the anvil, is the manager of a stage play in an obscure theater of Paris, who to take advantage of the situation, try to persuade that Nina (juliette Binoche, here in one of her first roles) is an actress with capital "A". The second, Quentin (Lambert Wilson) a tormented boy, who had caused the death of his beloved, assumes the role of "modeler" and keeps "molding" the character of the also newly arrived to the adult age. More another, Paulot (Wadeck Stanczak) at first courteous and later (understanding that Nina only uses people to arrive where she wants) selfish and cruel in his behavior - in view of the real situation - and finally Scrutzler (Jean Louis Trintignant) delineate the frame all the artists must have: the capacity of understand the essence of what the author wrote (do you remember the listless way Nina reads Romeo and Juliet from Shakespeare, without understanding the pain/love of the chief characters?) At the end, sorrowful and not counting with those who "support" her, she starts to upgrade to the human improvement, which is only available by pain. One movie that I classify - in a scale from 1 to 10 - as grade 9 (excellent).
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
What a Waste!!
film_ophile8 March 2009
Oh sooooo disappointing. The most helpful thing I can tell you is Don't Bother! Sure, the acting was great, fearless etc etc. but the script was so very baaad. The writer/director et al- they just couldn't decide WHAT to do with this story. Actually, the only really interesting thing for me in this film- is the performance of Lambert Wilson doing a young Jeremy Irons.'I'm sure my film experiences of him are stunted but I have only known him as a comedic/semi-comedic actor.He does a very riveting job as the tortured soul here. But still, there are so many good films directed by Techine or starring these actors; just skip this one.
9 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superb movie! (: Warning: Spoilers
Brilliant Andre Techine film, erotic, romantic, with feminist themes, and absolutely outstanding acting performances by the entire cast.

Juliette Binoche had her first important role in this movie, and she shows the promise that she has kept: she plays pretty much all of the different personas she has played throughout her career in this one film! She is sexy, elfin, a "free spirit", confused, afraid...she deservedly got her first Cesar nomination (Best Actress) for this role, losing to Sandrine Bonnaire of Agnes Varda's "Vagabond".

Wadeck Stanczak won the Cesar award for "most promising male newcomer" for his role as the somewhat shy lovesick Paolot. His is the male lead role in the film. I have never seen him in anything else; this often happens with the "most promising actor" Cesar winners. His name seems polish to me? Very handsome and very likable.

Lambert Wilson is smoldering in his intense and driven performance as Quentin. His is really a supporting role despite his receiving his first Cesar nomination for this role (losing, inexplicably, to Christophe Lambert of "Subway"). I have always loved Lambert Wilson, even if I haven't loved the films he has been in (my favorite: "Private Fears in Public Places"). This movie came out 28 years ago and he is still smoldering and sexy today! (Does Quentin commit suicide or is it an accident?) Jean-Louis Trintignant doesn't show up until late in the film but he is his usual brilliant self as an older man who brings out the jealousy in Paolot.

Andre Techine brings out so much in his actors in all of his films. He has a gay sensibility, even when all the characters are straight.

Absolutely worth seeing!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Emotional recollection
julievignondecourcy9 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
There is very mixed opinion on here surrounding Rende-Vous and I was unsure how I feel about the film seeing it 15 years after my first viewing. I needn't have worried I found the film to be an excellent, psychological drama with riveting central performances.

Released in 1985, today the film looks dated, but its focus and themes remain as vibrant as ever. Juliette Binoche gives a startlingly memorable debut as Nina, the provincial actress who in attempting to grasp hold of her destiny is instead cruelly manipulated by circumstance.

I had to smile at the review criticizing her reading of the lines for Romeo & Juliet as being absolutely awful. The fact is that they were supposed to be awful (so in that way the film and Binoche succeed). Nina is a headstrong young girl, but nothing in the film suggests she has any sort of talent in terms of acting, until she meets Scrutzer and can find the emotional maturity necessary to play Juliet. There is of course irony here: Why is there a need for emotional maturity when playing a teenager? The answer of course lies with one of the most important themes at play here: that artistic maturity can only be achieved through real experience - in this case the loneliness and grief Nina needs to experience to come to terms with the character of Juliet.

That the first part of the film and the love-triangle it establishes and cruelly destroys facilitates this is where the film finds it's strength. It's through a coincidence of circumstance that Nina and Scrutzler come to meet in the first place. Had that not happened Nina would not have experienced much of the misery in her life, nor the maturity she later grasps.

The first part of the film is stunningly tight with Techine tightly creating a sense of obsession among the three main characters (Nina, Quentin and Paulo). This sort of focus is missing from Techine's later films such as Les Temoins, Alice et Martin and Loin and had he displayed the same control on those as he does here they would have been even better for it.

As the story arcs and Trintignant's Scrutzler comes to the fore the film finds it's final equilibrium as do the characters. This is not the stuff of happy endings, but is instead that of realization and in the case of the actress emotional recollection which empowers her ability to perform.

In her leading debut Binoche is very strong, it's not hard to see why the French press were so excited by her in this role and why it opened the path to her (still) magnificent career. She creates in Nina a figure of pathos mixed with a coarse ignorance that is slowly eroded to reveal a significant intellect and talent - on stage and off, on screen and off.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
That Thing called Desire
akoaytao123417 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Techine's Rendez-vous (1985) tells the story of Nina (Binoche), a young struggling actress trying to better her life in the busy streets of Paris. When a turbulent lover dies unexpectedly, she is left to fend the guilt of the failed relationship while juggling another lover who seeks a more mature relationship off her.

Rendez-vous(1985) is an interesting study on sex and its role in relationships. Nina is a sees herself as a woman confident of her sexuality and is ready to use it for her own comfort. But as the film progresses, It seems to be that she is just too eaten up by her own uncertainties and insecurities that her sexuality acts as a defense mechanism for her to be accepted. But as the film shows, it affects her relationship the other way. The man she put out with ends up seeing through her. More often leaving her disillusioned by her actions. [4/5]
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A beautiful, sexy art -film!
kellycastlebridge15 July 2009
Rendez-vous is a beautiful, sexy, art-film. It won several prestigious international awards and is critically acclaimed. Juliette Binoche is completely uninhibited and gives a brave, fearless performance where she bares herself completely...both emotionally and physically.

Thus, this film is not intended for the immature. Those with childish minds who cannot handle looking at a beautiful woman's body (such as feminists or other philistines) are advised too avoid this. Another reviewer called it "pointless drivel" and complained about the "gratuitous nudity". If seeing a woman's vagina is too much for the immature mind of that viewer to handle, him and his kind should avoid high-art cinema such as this. His kind would be better served watching gay-porn garbage, loosely disguised as a "comedy", such as "Bruno". That type of film is more suited for those misandric simpletons who prefer looking at male genitalia. Those who appreciate complex, beautiful art and appreciate the female form will enjoy this.

Nina (Juliette Binoche) moves to Paris and she becomes the love interest of three very different men and has tumultuous concurrent relationships with each. Multiple plot and character lines develop from this. This movie will challenge you and you'll find yourself pondering some of the scenes days later. Highly recommended.
6 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A strange and lurching journey
philosopherjack11 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Andre Techine's Rendez-Vous leaves us to chew over a citation from John's Gospel: ""Very truly I tell you, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds." The most obvious application is to Lambert Wilson's Quentin, who throws himself under a car midway through the movie after staging a contest of sort for Nina's (Juliette Binoche's) affections - his death sets the stage for Nina to meet a respectable theatre director (Jean-Louis Trintignant) and to gravitate to serious acting work, playing Juliet, while also freeing herself of unhealthy attachments. In the end, she's almost strenuously self-defined - the director leaves before the opening night curtain goes up, the other man who loved her seems to have cleared his head, and we never even see who is playing Romeo. It's a strange and lurching journey to get to that point though, one marked by regular swerves in behaviour and focus, by return visits by Quentin from beyond the grave, and by a problematic objectification of Nina: a woman who initially uses her sexuality freely, but thereafter struggles to have her voice heard and her will respected (Binoche, as always, inhabits the role with complete commitment). The film often feels borderline nutty in its flirting with extremity, as if setting itself a challenge - the depiction of a public sex club, where the self-loathing Quentin exercises his notion of his art (this time with a different take on Romeo and Juliet), certainly contributes to this sense, even as it broadens the film's notion of sexuality as display. Overall, it's rather impressive that Techine makes it feel as coherent and unified as it does. Still, his later work would almost always be more accomplished, whether measured by the depth of its human investigations or by the allure of its structural mysteries.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed