The Clan of the Cave Bear (1986) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
81 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Decent adaption of an epic novel
thrix19 September 2005
The movie version of 'Clan of the cave bear' isn't really a bad adaption - but the very fact that this is a movie, running less than two hours, forces it to be a very compact version of the book. A lot of the details are left out, which of course is unfortunate.

Overall, the acting is quite good. How are we really supposed to act so it will be like neanderthals? Can you really put all their knowledge and way of life and act it out when modern man is so much different (or are we?). Daryl Hannah is probably a good choice for Ayla at the time, and thanks to the 80's still Allowing 'rougher stuff' to be shown, or as I prefer it: more natural, the abuse described in Auel's novel is to most extent included.

To sum it up: an OK adaption, but a 2-hour movie does not make this novel justice.
37 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
And we thought that cavemen yelled "yabba dabba doo!"
Skeletors_Hood20 August 2002
This is one of the films that I grew up watching, and even now, I love it and admire its beauty as much as I ever did.

First of all, comparing movies to their books isn't something we should do, because they are two different forms of entertainment, and can take different liabilities. What is important is if the movie still tells the basic story, and in the case of the Clan of the Cave Bear, it stuck to the original story in a very suitable fashion. I must admit that when I first saw this movie, I did not know that this was from a book. It wasn't until 15 years later that I read the book, and it confirmed my statement that the movie kept the story intact.

As far as the acting was concerned, I have to admire a cast that had to convey throughout an entire script in a totally different language, and manage to keep it consistent. Watching the film, you can see that certain gestures always mean the same thing, as well as certain grunts and sounds. Folks, that is the result of a lot of hard work, and to put down that part of the film is like looking at the Empire State Building as just the result of an erector set.

The basic story of the movie is to show prejudice against what is new and not understood. Ayla's presence is meant to show the Clan what the future holds, which is the underlying reason why they fear and hate her, though they are unaware of the reasons. Ayla endures many trials throughout the movie in order to gain their trust and approval, which ultimately prepare her for a journey into the world without the Clan.

A movie worth watching again and again. The book is great also, by the way, so I recommend them both.
50 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Could have been better
Thoughts_in_Chaos26 February 2007
I am not going to say it sucked because it was nothing like the book. I am merely going to say that if you have read the book, don't bother because it will only tick you off. And What ticks me off is not that it didn't follow the book closely enough, it didn't follow the book AT ALL. There are scenes that should have happened well after they did, and scenes that happened that would have explained other scenes that were in the movie that aren't. To the above commenter who said that the subsequent books were all romance fodder, first Valley was not, it wasn't until the end that most of the pleasures were added, with small intermittent scenes throughout. Yes, there are a lot of Pleasures scenes in the books, Yes, they could have been done without, but that doesn't mean that the rest of the story is not worth reading. That is not what I am writing a review on, however. I was more upset that the movie didn't even maintain a SEMBLANCE to the book, other than the character's name, almost as if the director skimmed the book, and took pieces from sections without thinking about how they would go together.
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Out now on "budget" DVD, fun to watch after all these years.
TxMike4 August 2002
The popularity of DVD has exploded the past couple of years like no new entertainment technology before. We are seeing more and more older films released on DVD for a pittance, like this one, "Clan of the Cave Bear", which I purchased for under $6US. There isn't much sound in this film, but the images, all shot in British Columbia, come through really well.

The setting in time is prehistoric, during the brief overlap of the Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon humans. Ayla (Daryl Hannah), a very blonde Cro-Magnon, was orphaned as a small girl, wounded, and found by the dark-haired Cave Bear Clan of Neanderthals. Against the wishes of the leader, she is taken in and nursed back to health by the medicine woman. As she grows up we see that she is innately smarter than her adopted family, learns things quickly, begins to innovate. The Neanderthals are portrayed as if they had perhaps an IQ of 80, while Ayla certainly has an IQ of 120 to 140.

This causes difficulties for her, because the women are totally subserviant, and one of them showing smarts or initiative is punished. A woman who even touches a hunting weapon is sentenced to die. But when Ayla does to defend a tribesman, she is only exiled in the winter and, if she survives, allowed to come back. She does, but finally realizes her "spirit" is different, and leaves to look for her own kind. After she fights and defeats the young "alpha male", who earlier had raped her thus giving her a child.

Some critics scoff at the primative community portrayed here, but it in fact is very accurate. In the DVD commentary we learn that much of the design for this film came from watching a few crude videotapes that were actually made by the Cro-Magnons during that prehistoric period and were discovered, well-preserved, in far northern sub-freezing caves in the 1960s. Not surprisingly, they were in the Beta format.

The whole film is about acceptance of someone different and of change. This is a common theme in many many films over the years, and is closely related to the popular "Pleasantville" of 1998. What makes this one different and enjoyable is the setting in time, the depiction of community values of these prehistoric peoples. I rate it highly overall.
40 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
complete disappointment
jenafel9 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I am one of those who absolutely adore the stories of Ayla written by Jean Auel. I've read them all several times and am still waiting for the upcoming parts to the story. However, not until now have I seen this movie... and what a disappointment..

There is just too many holes in this story that there's no end to it. I mean, I understand that in -86 there was some things you couldn't make as perfect as you can in modern film - like the looks of the so called Neanderthals of this movie, or the small variations in the clan way of behaving.. But you could at least keep to the story. If you can't make a long enough movie, so you could include all the important details instead of making your own "short version", then why even bother?

I mean just for example: First of all, the way Ayla lost her family and when she saw Iza for the first time. Why change those small things? The way Creb learned her how to speak the Clan way - was it so hard to show more of that, to express how hard that was for her? The way Ayla got her totem, and when! Iza would never have asked Creb to find a totem for her, and why the long time? Uba wasn't supposed to be born! When Iza started training her to become a medicine woman.. It was way earlier in the story than that. Why Ayla decided to hunt even though it was forbidden, and why she learned to throw two stones. When Broud raped her, and why. When Ayla got pregnant, and why she wanted to keep it so badly. Why Broud separates Ayla from Durc when he gets leader.. That Ayla would use her weapon against Broud... that's insane.

And the fact that she would give birth to Durc alone in her cave is just WHAAAT?! Complete mix-up. And that Ayla and Uba would have met one of the Others in the middle of nowhere?! (Jondalar?) I mean that doesn't fit into anywhere.

It's mostly small stuff that I don't understand WHY they would change, but I could have lived with small differences as long as they could've kept to the true story and not cutting it short because of budget or whatever. The relationships between all the characters was never told the way it should, it feels like more than half of it was left out.

If i hadn't read the books beforehand I'm sure I could have appreciated it better, but this simply pisses me off.

It's a shame that such a great story never will be told the way it deserves, because of this.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Neanderthals prefer blondes
tomsview8 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Entertaining and surprisingly engaging, "The Clan of the Cave Bear" teaches us that there was a time when mankind was divided into two species. Type one – the Neanderthals – had big foreheads, dark hair and a monobrow, while type two – the Cro-Magnons – were tall, blonde and had great teeth.

Ayla, a Cro-Magnon child, is left for dead after being attacked by a lion. However she is found by a nomadic tribe of Neanderthals. They are reluctant to help at first as she belongs to a group they refer to as 'the others'– the Cro-Magnons. This is obvious from her blonde hair and the stylish cut of her animal skins, which also singles out the Cro-Magnons from the more shaggy-looking Neanderthals. A kindly Neanderthal male, Creb, talks the tribe into letting he and his wife Iza take the child with them.

Years pass and Ayla has become one of the Neanderthal tribe despite the fact she has grown tall, blonde and has great teeth. In fact, Ayla has become Daryl Hannah, and although she would have little trouble in reaching the finals of the Miss Cro-Magnon pageant, to the Neanderthals, she is quite ugly and decidedly forehead and eyebrow challenged.

Despite this, one of the young Neanderthal males, Broud, is attracted to her. No doubt, the way Ayla fills out her animal skins caught his eye. In Neanderthal culture, a desire to couple is indicated by the male clasping his hands; the deed then takes place without further ceremony. After Ayla responds to many handclasp signals from Broud, she falls pregnant.

Ayla is also a bit of a tomboy and wants to throw spears, use a slingshot and hang out with the guys target shooting. However this is taboo in Neanderthal culture; the punishment for a woman caught fooling around with the boy's toys is instant death. But Ayla becomes an expert with the slingshot. When a wolf carries off a young Neanderthal boy, Ayla brings the animal down with one shot. Her cover blown, she is forced to demonstrate her skill to the males who will decide her fate; they quickly realise that she has in fact become a prehistoric Annie Oakley with the slingshot.

Although she would normally face death, she is instead banished for the winter. She delivers the baby by herself and survives by using her hunting skills to catch food.

As the years pass, Iza and Cleb grow old and feeble, Ayla on the other hand does not change much at all, she retains her youthful appearance proving that an outdoor life free of smog and pollutants does wonders for Cro-Magnon skin. When the clan joins a great gathering of Neanderthals, another male disregards Ayla's lack of forehead and monobrow and takes a shine to her. This is Brun, and he is everything Broud is not; he is thoughtful, polite and chivalrous. Unfortunately he literally loses his head when the young men of the tribe attack a bear – showing how precarious existence was before the invention of the tranquilliser gun.

Broud becomes leader of the tribe, and his first act is to take Ayla as his wife. When he attempts to separate her from her child Dirk, Ayla refuses and fights him. The tribal elders come to her assistance. Broud is stripped of leadership of the clan as he has failed to uphold the tribe's charter on every possible level.

But now, Ayla, who has developed a markedly spiritual side to her character, decides that her destiny does not lie with the clan. She says goodbye to them all including her child, who is half Neanderthal and destined to become the leader of the clan. She is last seen heading towards the sunset to seek 'the others' to whom she feels she more rightly belongs.

The last scenes are quite moving. Identity and the feeling of belonging are dominant themes in the film. Anthropologists might question some of the liberties taken by the filmmakers, but "Clan of the Cave Bear" is one of those movies where the best thing is to just sit back and enjoy the ride.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An Affront to an Excellent Book!
Maevyn1 February 2004
I have seen this movie and I have read the novel that it is based on. Let me make this clear: this movie does not hold a candle to the book! Jean M. Auel's novel is a great piece of prehistorical fiction, and my personal favorite book (and it's in competition with books like "Huckleberry Finn," "Jane Eyre," and "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest"). I know that movies based on books are rarely as good as said book, but this is intense. The movie cuts, adds, changes, and mish-mashes things together, all of which is at a detriment to the story line (I know some part of that is grammatically incorrect). The movie loses all the depth and subtlety of Ms. Auel's novel, and it miscasts Darryl Hannah. Don't get me wrong, she's a fine actress, but she was also way to old to play the leading character. If you are interested in the plot or premise of the movie, read the book instead. Your braincells will thank you.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Why was this so coldly received?
I saw this little unknown gem two days ago, and I was just blown away by all the horrible reviews for it back in 1986. I just don't understand why people didn't want to see a healthy Darryl Hannah as the cave girl, Ayla. Maybe it's because, Darryl Hannah didn't appear nude, even though the costumes are scantily. All in all, It is a nice movie to watch. It tugs at your heartstings seeing all of the brutal honesty presented on screen. And that music! Oh, I was the Niagra Falls from the beautiful music. The most heart-breaking scene of this movie is when Ayla is separated from her mother at 2, from a vicious earthquake. The ghastly "R" rating is unecessary, altough the rape scene is horrible and graphic, they could have sacrificed for a PG or PG13.Watch this one if get the chance. You won't be disappointed!

1986 98 minutes Rated: R CC.
62 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Shootout at the O K ave Coral?
oxymoron-310 June 2000
From the standpoint of being able to take a Good book and turning it into a piece of rubbish? This then was a masterpiece. I had no problem with the casting of this film. Actually I thought the actors did a good job all things considered. However, Daryl Hannah as Ayla ...was for me a total wash out, this part required a stronger acting presence and in my opinion called for an actor of great ability. The visuals of the film were magnificent, and the Photography sometimes bordered on genius. But why is it that screen writers think that they have to "fix" a perfectly good story, by taking the same time it would take to tell the "actual" story and instead telling a silly disjointed and inaccurate one? One where none of the characters really develop nor become loved by the audience. Oh yes, I know that screen writers must compress events and so on. But this screenplay of Mr. John Sayles, was one of the worst examples I have ever seen. Not only was the "time line" of the story tragically out of whack, but when Ayla broke Brouds spear with her sling at the "shootout at the O.K. Coral" scene at the End of the film... Anyone who read the book would be able to tell you that had that actually happened, based on what we knew from the characters and the clan in this wonderful book, she would have been killed by the clan immediately. That would have been a travesty of enormous proportion for them. The real heart of the actual story, was the relationships between Ayla, Iza,Creb and Brun, and her interpersonal growth as a being, was almost completely missed in this film and the development of the characters whom you loved in the book was no where in sight. Basically the film characters. by virtue of really bad screen writing became a bunch of cardboard cut outs without connection one to the other. It was a mish mash of people running in and out of scenes. Jean M. Auel could not have been happy with this mess. I hope she was paid enough. If any of you fellow viewers have seen any of her comments on this film, I would appreciate you E-mailing them along to me. I would happily give her and her book at least a 9. but this movie was a mess and it's present IMDb rating of 4.9 is about 2.9 points to high. If you have read the book and wish to suffer....see this film. That is this viewers opinion.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Drama/adventure about a young Cro-Magnons woman who is raised by Neanderthals.
ma-cortes18 May 2012
Prehistoric tale set in Stone Age about cavemen plenty of drama , adventures , thrilling events and speaking a special language and particular primitive movements . At a time in prehistory when Neanderthals shared the Earth with early Homo Sapiens , a band of cave-dwellers travels through uncharted landscapes towards an unknown territory , searching for caves to shelter themselves . During their quest , they encounter and battle various animals as buffalo , lion , wolves and tribesmen in order to survive . Iza (Pamela Reed), Medicine woman of the "Clan of the Cave Bear" meets little Ayla from the "other"'s clan ; the little girl loses her parents , Ayla is taken in by after her own parents are disappeared , tradition would have the clan kill Ayla immediately , but the Medicine women insists on keeping her . Iza as a primitive gamine adopts blond and blue-eyed Ayla , the lost child of the "Others" . As it results out later , she's a bright girl , but has a hard time to keep her place in a clan with different habits . As the scrawny cavegirl named Ayla (a gorgeous primitive babe played by Daryl Hannah) matures into a young woman of spirit and courage , being helped by Creg (James Remar) , she must fight for survival against the jealous bigotry of Broud (Thomas G Waites) , who will one day be clan chief .

This interesting film about primitive humans contains drama , emotions , fights and is pretty entertaining . Ponderous and sometimes slow-moving , the picture failed at box office , however , nowadays being better considered . Based on Jean M. Auel's popular novel with screenplay by prestigious John Sayles , there is minimal narration ; subtitles translate the Neanderthal gestures and primitive spoken language . A planned back-to-back sequel never made it into production . Emotive musical score by Alan Silvestri , though composed by synthesizer . Colorful and brilliant cinematography by Jan De Bont , subsequently become filmmaker . The motion picture was well realized by Michael Chapman . Chapman is deemed one of the best cameraman of cinema , he photographed a lot of successes such as ¨Evolution¨ , ¨Primal fear¨, ¨The fugitive¨, ¨Rising sun¨, ¨Ghostbusters II¨, ¨Shoot to kill¨ and masterpieces for Martin Scorsese as ¨Raging Bull¨, ¨Last Walz¨, Taxi driver¨ . He occasionally directed some films as ¨The viking sagas¨, ¨All the right moves¨ and this ¨The clan of bear cave¨.

Other films dealing with cavemen are the following : ¨One million B.C. ¨(1940) by Hal Roach with Victor Mature and Carole Landis ; ¨One million years B.C.¨ by Don Chaffey with Rachel Welch and John Richardson ; ¨!0.000 B.C.¨ by Roland Emmerich with Steven Strait and Camilla Belle ; and the best is ¨Quest of fire¨ by Jean Jacques Annaud with Everett McGill and Ron Perlman .
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Did not do justice
cassielund25 April 2001
While the story of The Clan of the Cave Bears is a magnificent tale the movie did very little to capture that story. The film attempted to capture a deep and intricate epic story in the flash of a moment... and unfortunately failed grandly. I was hoping to see some of the wonderful scenes, written by the author Jean Auel, come to life but instead found an overview, a weak one at that, of the story in a very low quality format. Not even Daryl Hannah could save the film. If you want to know The Clan of the Cave Bear read the book... You will not be disappointed!
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An intense story of a young woman's survival
BB-1526 June 2004
If the movie lacks anything it is the beauty of the photography in films like "Quest for Fire" and "Windwalker". Otherwise I can't find any serious flaws. It is rare to find a decent movie about prehistoric peoples. "Quest for Fire" is the best movie of this kind in my opinion but "Clan of the Cave Bear" is a close second.

I am not trying to compare "Cave Bear" to the books by Jean M. Auel. To me the film takes the best part of Auel's story and makes a pretty good movie. The later Auel stories become more romance novel fodder and to some that may be more entertaining. "Clan of the Cave Bear" is not romantic. It captures the brutality of prehistory very well for a fiction film. I've seen documentaries about the Neanderthal and was surprised how accurately "Cave Bear" showed that time. The flaws in human nature are shown in all their rawness in this movie. There is prejudice, oppression and abuse in full force. What makes it bearable for me is how the Darryl Hannah character is able to deal with this and eventually over come it.

"Cave Bear" also shows some of the ritual of stone age culture with the Shaman and the hunting rites of passage. There is some beauty in that culture. But the bottom line for these people is survival and that was a very difficult thing to accomplish. They were scratching and clawing (literally) just to eat and raise children. And sadly we know that they are doomed (except for a few Neanderthals who possibly interbred with Cro-Magnons).

This kind of documentary approach in "Cave Bear" will not thrill those who want a stone age comedy-romance, "Caveman", or a special effects absurdity of prehistoric people fighting lots of dinosaurs, "One Million BC", (which is historically impossible). But if you can appreciate an intense story of a young woman's survival in the wild and her experience with a lost stone age culture, then I recommend "Clan of the Cave Bear". 9/10
43 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Actually pretty good
Calicodreamin14 August 2020
I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of this book adaptation. The storyline mostly stays true to the original and the changes that are made make sense. The acting is really good, considering most of the language is nonverbal. The costuming and cinematography are believable.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Ugh.
cruztacean9 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I am giving four stars for the acting and cinematography, which were excellent.

What bites is the degree to which the movie strayed from the book. Now, I realize that some of this would be inevitable. But the screenwriters took it too far, as if they didn't get the spirit of the books. They essentially made it an altogether different story with the same names. The movie lost me after the first scenes depicting the earthquake and the cave lion attack, which were done well. After that, I didn't recognize it. I'm talking about major differences in both plot and character.

Plot: The movie says Ayla is "the first of the Others that the Clan had seen." What about the man with the broken arm, whom Iza's grandmother had treated for his injuries? It is The Mammoth Hunters, the third book in the series, that finally reveals just who the man was, but the story is told in CotCB.

Plot: Ayla is not pregnant at the time of her exile. She does not give birth in solitude. As a matter of fact, she doesn't even reach full adulthood until long after she is caught using the weapon, the crime for which she is exiled (death cursed) in the first place.

Plot: The movie suggests that no one would provide for Durc simply because Ayla had no mate, and her adopted father could not himself hunt. In fact, the baby was half Cro-Magnon. The Neanderthals had never seen a mixture before and didn't understand the combination of features. They saw Durc as hideously deformed, even more so than Creb. It was for that reason that the men of the Clan had wanted to leave him to die, not just because he would be a welfare child.

Character: Broud has been raping Ayla repeatedly. Like modern rapists, he is actually getting his jollies from making Ayla do something she hates. Finally, during the last rape, she is so happy about being pregnant that she doesn't care anymore and doesn't react. To put it as delicately as possible, this completely deflates Broud, and he can't continue. So far so good. But then one of the women who are watching immediately takes a dig at Broud's wife Oga, using a stick in her hand to illustrate her point, and the women giggle. Mrs. Auel had made it clear in her book that 1.) The Neanderthals were not able to smile or laugh, and 2.) The women are genetically programmed to be so submissive and fearful of the men, that they would never have laughed about a man's shortcomings even if they could.

Character: Brun also is seen smiling, something that he should not have been able to do.

Character: Blond, blue-eyed Ayla is seen as terribly ugly by the Clan, because she is so drastically different. Her height and her propensity for hunting make her, though she seems the ideal of feminine beauty to us, appear to the Clan as something of a butch. So why would Brug, the blue-eyed Clan (which is doubtful) have ignored Uba, a young woman from the highest line of medicine women, in favor of so-called ugly and unladylike Ayla? The movie suggests that had Brug not been killed in the bear ceremony, he would have possibly pursued a mating. I have trouble adapting to that. Which leads me to--

Plot: There is no Brug in the Clan of the Cave Bear book. It was Gorn who was killed in the bear ceremony. Brug doesn't come along until Plains of Passage. He is also known as Brugar, and then he is a different person entirely.

Plot: The hallucination Ayla experiences after she follows the mog-urs into the cave is nowhere near the book. Also, the movie shows Ayla being summoned to the cave, drawn by Creb/Mog-ur's voice calling to her by name. Actually, for her to be there was deadly taboo. The movie did not make this clear.

Plot AND Character: After making Broud leader, Brun would not have had the power to then fire him. And Broud's falling to the ground in abject humility after Brun's chastisement of him would not have happened.

The playing-with-the-echo scene, I understand, is simply a method by which they showed the passage of time as Ayla grew to be a woman. Seemed a little cheesy to me, though. I had wondered why in the heck she would be standing there repeatedly calling out her own name. It took me a few viewings to realize that she was, in fact, playing with an echo.

Kudos to the actors, to the makeup artists, to the people in charge of scenery, etc. Not-so-kudos to the screenwriters. I think they blew it.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well done
Trinitty152 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I have read Clan of the Cave Bear by Jean M. Auel several times and I have listened to it on book tape as well.

The book is magnificent. It is not high English Literature, but it is face-paced, engaging, thorough, realistic and very well researched. I have also read the Valley of Horses and the rest of the Earth's Children Series. However, I put Shelters of Stone down because is pales in comparison to her earlier work in Clan of the Cave Bear and Valley of Horses.

When I heard a movie had been made, I was both curious and concerned. Curious because I really enjoy the story and the "prehistory" genre - concerned because the vast majority of film adaptations from books are really disappointing.

I really enjoy this film and I now include it in my DVD collection.

The writers and directors did a very brave and wise thing by subtitling the language of the Clan, rather than making the "big dumb cavemen" speak some form of grunting English. They captured the dignity, culture and subtly of the Neanderthals as they were portrayed in Auel's novel, they didn't look like raging men in cheap gorilla suits as they did in Quest for Fire. What could not really be captured was the depth of herb lore and knowledge possessed by Clan, it would not have made for exciting film if a lengthy explanation of plants were included.

I thought Hanna did an excellent job. The reason why they could not use a teen-aged girl was most likely the height factor. Ayla is supposed to tower over even the largest man of the clan, "big and ugly." It would have been very difficult to find a teenager who could not only ACT convincingly in such trying conditions, but who would be tall enough in comparison to the Neanderthals.

The rape scene is horrible, but is realistic and it was necessary to include it. It is a pivotal point in the novel, a moment in time when Ayla's spirit could have been shattered, she suffers as a result and is the stronger for it. I would not let children watch it though, for that scene.

The hunting scene is very well done, it is real and tense and true to the book, so are the clan gathering and the sacrifice of the Cave Bear.

I do not understand how a fan of the book could dislike the movie.

***Spoiler*** The only things I disapprove of are the end when Ayla leaves and the lack of explanation of "Clan memories." In the book, Creb dies and Ayla is cast out of the Clan with her loved ones huddled together under the tyrannical leadership of Broud, which is what would have happened to a people who had become incapable of adapting. There was no satisfying reprimand from Brun, ripping the leadership away from his son, Broud. The ending is way too "Hollywood" and pink, and I do not know why they bothered to change it. The film is real and gritty throughout, why fluff it at the end? The vision of the shared memories that Ayla and Creb have at the Clan gathering is NOT the same as it is in the book. The vision in the book shows the journey through time from the primordial beginnings of life on Earth to the technological future and possible end. It is the main message of Earth's Children (In my opinion) and it is unfortunate that it was altered in this otherwise very meticulous film.

I am very pleased that the film was made, and I am disappointed that it did not get better reviews at the time, it deserved much better. It is quiet and patient and authentic. Real animals are used, no over-the-top musical scores are employed, subtitles and gestures are very well done, casting and costumes are detailed and the camera shots are long and unhurried…. It captures the raw nature of the time.

Although I would be pleased to see Valley of Horses made into a film, to see Thonolan and Jondalar and the rest of the interesting characters and wrenching moments depicted, I hope that a sequel is NOT made… unless someone who is true to the books bothers to pick up the project.

Most Hollywood movies are really awful nowadays and I would doubt that a studio and film-making team would be able to do it justice with the cast and the budget, and the patience they would need to do it right.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Loved the books but not the movie..
helmik28 March 2020
I really wanted to like this movie, since the book series were so good. Sadly they had changed multiple critical moments in the movie and the whole story lost it's meaning. It was also difficult to see how anyone could understand the whole movie, without reading the books first. I wish someone would try to remake this as it should've been done. Honoring the book series.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Am I convinced? Not entirely
neil-4766 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Many years ago I tried starting to read Jean M Auel's novel. Despite the fact that it is very much my kind of thing, I could never get into it. So I come to the movie, 25 years after it was made, completely cold.

Its story of a Cro-Magnon orphan being adopted into a tribe of Neanderthals and having to cope with prejudice and antagonism is absolutely fine. The events and motivations all seem entirely reasonable, and who is to say otherwise? The story progresses satisfactorily, is easy to follow (with subtitles and voice-over where necessary), the photography is lush and the performances aren't bad (I don't think you have to be particularly subtle to play an irritable Neanderthal).

But there were a couple of elements which made the suspension of disbelief a little difficult. One was Daryl Hannah's tasty clean-haired blonde Cro-Magnon, just a little bit too 20th centurily gorgeous to convince as a stone age trailblazer for women's lib.

And the other is the Neanderthal wigs. The prosthetics are, for the most part, fine (and appropriate, of course), but the wigs don't cut it, I'm afraid. They are so immobile that they might as well have been cast in plaster, and they scream, "This is an actor in a wig." And, of course, that's exactly what it is, but you don't want it hammered home during every second of screen time.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bad!
akomouse28 August 2002
This movie is deffinately not as good as the book, it disappoints me, as the book is so good, and this movie so dismal! It is so loosely based on the book, it isn't even really the story of the clan of the cave bear story because they changed it so much!
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not alike the movie, But good.
djigimon15 July 2008
Lacking some of the minor details. And changing it slightly. As in that she hadn't seen her mother fall into the pit. She was playing in the river. And she doesn't learn to speak until quite a bit later. Or that in the beginning, she never touched a weapon. Of course, Book to video always changes. So that much was already expected. The progression of the movie, compared to the book was startling. And Why was there a flock of doves or pigeons living in the cave? They completely forgot the whole ceremony for the cave, and the feast. and the whole reason broud hates her. I find them very important aspects of the story. But they held some accuracy at least. It wasn't completely all there, but it wasn't a bad movie, overall.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting
jkennard-9797230 April 2020
An interesting and dramatic take on the origins of the homsapien genus. The storyline is progressive and emersive with strong performances, good visuals and a enjoyable sondtrack. Overall a pretty good film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Sadly flat for a story of these proportions
fredrikgunerius25 October 2023
Good intentions and a fairly faithful adaptation of Jean M. Auel's novel help keep this forgotten 1980s adventure on an almost watchable level, despite some obvious shortcomings. One of these is director Michael Chapman's oblivious attention to detail and anthropological observations - which was the very basis for the success of Auel's book. Another is the lack of nerve and intensity in the storytelling. As the story is portrayed here, the characters' actions and lives don't feel as relevant and defining as they should and as Auel intended them to be. Her Ayla may seem like a superbeing, but she's not only a lovable character, she's also used as a vanguard for human development by Auel - something Chapman fails to communicate completely. The result is that The Clan of the Cave Bear lacks the facets and layers of the novel. Instead Chapman seems content with launching Daryl Hannah (who is right for the part, incidentally) as a rebellious feminist cavewoman. In line with 1980s action conventions, yes, but sadly flat for a story of these proportions.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
all reviwers must be knee-jerk fundamentalists
takatomon18 April 2003
so far, aside from the comments here at IMDB, i have not seen one positive review for this film. i just don't get it. i honestly think it's a political assault against a film that threatens reviewers jealously guarded dogmas.

for me the film is escapism at it's finest. it's a film about cave dwellers that doesn't condescend by having the characters speak in english, but instead in subtitled "neanderthal". it gives the film believability as far as i'm concerned.

it's not a film about great conflicts and battles in pre-history, it's merely a character study about the final days of the neanderthals and how they are threatened by cro-magnons (daryl hannah).

it isn't an overly flowery movie. a couple of times it gets down and dirty in it's portrayal of mob rules mentality and racism. maybe the film offends viewers because they see themselves in the characters and don't like the comparison. all of the unpleasant behaviors, although simplified in the movie, still happen today in "more civilized times". people are still threatened by anyone different, women still get raped, sexism hasn't gone away and populations are still ruled by ruthless dictators.

for me, clan of the cave bear is a totally believeable story of life as it may have been 50,000 years ago. it protrays primitive people with primitave language, laws and beliefs with an honest affection. it's more of a "documentary" about daryl hanna's trials and tribulations in her adopted tribe than it is a plotted story. it comes off more like real life.

while anyone is entitled not to like the movie for whatever reason, i find the movie highly entertaining and an excellent escape into the world as it might actually have been long ago. it easily holds a spot in my top 50 list for it's totally unique experience.

i give it a 10 for bravely going where few films dare to and succeeding admirably without following boring hollywood formulas. it just doesn't deserve it's bad reviews at all. i don't give 10's out to many films either.
121 out of 168 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not all that bad, really.
Hey_Sweden12 December 2021
In this adaptation of the popular Jean M. Auel book (scripted by none other than John Sayles), Daryl Hannah is well cast as Ayla, a lovely Cro-Magnon in the early years of humankind. As a child, she loses her mother during an earthquake, and she is eventually taken in by a clan of less-developed Neanderthals. Sometimes, she is on shaky ground, as she dares to go against their social mores (such as handling a weapon and hunting, which are forbidden for women), but she is determined, and *has* won the friendship of medicine woman Iza (Pamela Reed) and the deformed, one-eyed Creb (James Remar). She also makes an enemy out of the brutish, rotten Broud (Thomas G. Waites).

Those who have actually read the book tend to consider this a lousy adaptation, but for this viewer, the picture is okay taken on its own terms. It tells a decent enough story in capable enough fashion. The director is Michael Chapman, who may have been in over his head given that he's usually a cinematographer (known for, among other things, shooting "Taxi Driver" and "Raging Bull" for Martin Scorsese). But the performances are adequate to the occasion, with Reed, Remar, and Waites (the last two having co-starred in "The Warriors" together) doing okay in the more fleshed-out roles. The makeup is fine; one of the artists involved was Michele Burke, who'd previously won an Oscar for work on the thematically similar "Quest for Fire". Given that Chapman was a cinematographer, he at least makes sure that this picture LOOKS good; his D. P. here was the equally adept Jan de Bont. ("The Clan of the Cave Bear" was filmed on location in various provincial parks in British Columbia.) It also has a lovely score by Alan Silvestri.

It will likely work better the less people expect to see any sort of history lesson; it's just Hollywood entertainment that fortunately gets some things right, enough to keep it watchable for 99 minutes.

Six out of 10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
caveman fantasy seen through 20th century eyes
klima29 August 2011
This film was shot in a remote part of a beautiful park in Southern British Columbia, Canada. That's the good part.

The premiss of the film is that at some point Neanderthals and Cro- magnons must have encountered each other and interbred. There is now DNA evidence that this happened approx 100,000 years ago, likely in several places, perhaps including Southern Europe and Southern Turkey.

Unfortunately the tale that the film tells is about a young woman (the Cro-Magnon) who plays a headstrong righteous person seeking emancipation at the hands of tyrants and an oppressive culture. The development is painfully slow, people communicate through the kind of hand signals and repeated utterances, as you might see in Mexico while watching stupid tourists. Darryl Hanna is easy to look at but boring otherwise. Her repertoire consists of cliché movements and faces.

In short, it's a combination of bad entertainment and an awful documentary.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I watch it again - and again!
milady_162519 June 2000
When I saw it was on the TV I got up at 2 in the morning to watch this film! I just couldn't wait until the morning! I thought it was really good but advice to anyone is READ THE BOOK! The story is absolutely captivating and involving from the start. Darryl Hannah is a good Ayla (if not a little old - she is supposed to be 12!) and the film does well with the language problem. The hand signals are good and there aren't too many sub-titles. I really like the music as well. I think this is a good attempt at summarising Jean Auel's work (which is really very difficult to film successfully) - But summary is the right word so you are really missing out until you read the novel - there is so much more to it- I think the film could be a little longer - it is a 800 page book! Even though it doesn't live up to the book it's still really good fun to see. I also think that a film of her later books would be a success - especially as the language isn't a problem then. My sister watched it before reading the book and she was hooked, so it's definitely a success whether you are familiar or otherwise with this compelling story. I think it's a real shame that it's deleted in the UK! It should be on TV more often so people have a chance to watch it.

On the whole I would advise any fan who is prepared to be open-minded to watch it - you are in for a treat. If you are just going to nit-pick about the plot - Forget It!
19 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed