This movie is suppose to tell the true tale about how 90,000 baboons went on a killing spree because of a severe drought in 1984. This movie bombed badly at the theaters. And it bombs badly as a movie itself. Did this really happen, I don't know. This movie is good for a laugh.
15 Reviews
I should really love this one, but the poor execution lets it down
Leofwine_draca7 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
An old-fashioned monster movie from the '50s, crossed with then-modern lashings of special effects and gore, sounds like a sure bet for this "killer baboon rampage" movie that failed to do much business at the box office when it was first released. The reason for this is that the movie is a strictly run-of-the-mill affair without much to get excited about, and in which the most exciting moments are those spent watching huge hordes of baboons charging through the African landscape. It's supposedly a true story, and the authentic Kenyan locations and supporting actors initially give it a feel of realism, but its not long before that feeling dissipates spectacularly.
Things begin well. There's an excellent battle between rhinos and jeeps which actually takes place for real, without the aid of special effects. After this they quickly go downhill, with the script strictly adhering to the basic monster movie template. That is, a few nonentities get killed off initially until the body count rises dramatically and the rest of the cast realises that there's a problem. The dialogue is adequate but the action is sparse. Those looking for some serious baboon vs. human fight scenes may well feel short shrifted as there are only a couple of brief shots in the film (obviously the model baboons created for the movie weren't up to prolonged camera exposure). The two action "highlights" would be NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD-style situations with the baboons replacing zombies and attempting to break into a house and then finally a hotel. Sadly, these are brief indeed, and ultimately disappointing.
The cast seems to be an unusually straight one for what is a simple B-movie with A-movie aspirations. The underrated John Rhys Davies, one of my favourite actors, takes the lead as an unconventional action hero. Once again he gives strength to his character, making him a warm and likable person. This is unexpected as at the beginning of the film he is set up as one of those uncaring leader-type blokes who ends up putting lives in danger and getting killed as a result. Timothy Bottoms is the young(er) hero, who disturbingly shaves off his beard halfway through the film which is quite disconcerting, especially as this action is never mentioned! You just see him again with only a moustache and end up wondering who the guy is. Irene Miracle lends copious glamour as Bottom's ex-wife, who inevitably ends up being in peril.
One good thing about this film are the special effects of the dead bodies - they're unusually graphic for a mainstream movie (check out Leonard Maltin's review, where he proclaims them as "disgusting"). We see corpses with severed limbs, blood pumping from throats and in the film's gruesome highlight, a body with half of its face ripped off. The gore is minimal but it gives the film that extra oomph for the horror fan, although being a mainstream movie you can guarantee that there'll be a sentimental happy ending in sight.
Elsewhere, things try to be serious and scary and end up being comical. A supposedly horrific shot of a man on a telegraph pole getting his leg ripped off by baboons is roll-on-the-floor hilarious yet apparently played for the horror aspect. A baboon attacks the pilot of a plane, causing it to crash - excuse me? After saying that this film is based on a true story this individual scene is pretty hard to swallow. Somebody also decided to shoot some of the action scenes in slow-motion, and they just look dumb and sap the film of its life. The use of a Steadicam leads to some inevitable EVIL DEAD-style 'chase' moments. The only thing I would recommend about this film is the good performance from John Rhys Davies - otherwise it's a missed opportunity and only suitable for those who really like baboons, or a monster fan stuck for something to watch.
Things begin well. There's an excellent battle between rhinos and jeeps which actually takes place for real, without the aid of special effects. After this they quickly go downhill, with the script strictly adhering to the basic monster movie template. That is, a few nonentities get killed off initially until the body count rises dramatically and the rest of the cast realises that there's a problem. The dialogue is adequate but the action is sparse. Those looking for some serious baboon vs. human fight scenes may well feel short shrifted as there are only a couple of brief shots in the film (obviously the model baboons created for the movie weren't up to prolonged camera exposure). The two action "highlights" would be NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD-style situations with the baboons replacing zombies and attempting to break into a house and then finally a hotel. Sadly, these are brief indeed, and ultimately disappointing.
The cast seems to be an unusually straight one for what is a simple B-movie with A-movie aspirations. The underrated John Rhys Davies, one of my favourite actors, takes the lead as an unconventional action hero. Once again he gives strength to his character, making him a warm and likable person. This is unexpected as at the beginning of the film he is set up as one of those uncaring leader-type blokes who ends up putting lives in danger and getting killed as a result. Timothy Bottoms is the young(er) hero, who disturbingly shaves off his beard halfway through the film which is quite disconcerting, especially as this action is never mentioned! You just see him again with only a moustache and end up wondering who the guy is. Irene Miracle lends copious glamour as Bottom's ex-wife, who inevitably ends up being in peril.
One good thing about this film are the special effects of the dead bodies - they're unusually graphic for a mainstream movie (check out Leonard Maltin's review, where he proclaims them as "disgusting"). We see corpses with severed limbs, blood pumping from throats and in the film's gruesome highlight, a body with half of its face ripped off. The gore is minimal but it gives the film that extra oomph for the horror fan, although being a mainstream movie you can guarantee that there'll be a sentimental happy ending in sight.
Elsewhere, things try to be serious and scary and end up being comical. A supposedly horrific shot of a man on a telegraph pole getting his leg ripped off by baboons is roll-on-the-floor hilarious yet apparently played for the horror aspect. A baboon attacks the pilot of a plane, causing it to crash - excuse me? After saying that this film is based on a true story this individual scene is pretty hard to swallow. Somebody also decided to shoot some of the action scenes in slow-motion, and they just look dumb and sap the film of its life. The use of a Steadicam leads to some inevitable EVIL DEAD-style 'chase' moments. The only thing I would recommend about this film is the good performance from John Rhys Davies - otherwise it's a missed opportunity and only suitable for those who really like baboons, or a monster fan stuck for something to watch.
Brilliant Film,Scared me as a kid-
dasiren20 April 2004
Having spent a large part of my life in Kenya, this film made me afraid to set out into the Tsavo for years. Based on Events that I remember the old people talking about
the film integrates those stories with just the right amount
of fright!! The fear that the drought brought was displayed truthfully in this film. It captures the rugged beauty of the Kenyan countryside and people such as no other films made in Kenya have. If you have a fear of animals, this heightens it!
the film integrates those stories with just the right amount
of fright!! The fear that the drought brought was displayed truthfully in this film. It captures the rugged beauty of the Kenyan countryside and people such as no other films made in Kenya have. If you have a fear of animals, this heightens it!
No action, no violence, no nothing
Nutri-Grain24 June 2001
This movie had a lot of potential. A fairly popular cast, good acting, and a whole lot of baboons. But this movie failed to deliver what most action/horror film fans want: action and horror. The baboons are never shown killing anyone, just the scared look of the person, the baboon, and then it cuts to a different scene. In fact, the only reason that this movie is rated R is because of the bloody bodies people find. That's it, not even bad language. There is way too much pointless dialogue, which takes up probably 3/4 of the movie. The actual killer baboons are shown at a total time of 1/10 of the movie. So if you're looking for an awesome adventure in Africa where the heroes are blasting away killer animals, DON'T WATCH THIS MOVIE. It is extremely boring and a waste of time. Overall rating: 2/10.
Don't Feed the Monkey!
Coventry12 May 2008
Some of the reviews I encountered on "In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro" complain that baboons aren't convincing and not nearly menacing enough to pass for murderous animals. Well, this is a false impression in general. During a recent trip to South Africa I made a couple of excursions and the first thing the tour guides always warn you for are wild baboons. They are extremely aggressive animals and if they spot people with food in their hands, they will relentlessly attack and steal it from them. I'm not familiar with the supposedly true event this movie is based on, but I find it to be quite plausible and – even in case it never happened – it's a terrific plot outline for a mature and intellectual eco-horror movie anyway. The year is 1984 and Kenya, as well as the majority of the African continent, slowly cringes under a severe drought. It hasn't rained in months, the wildlife deteriorates, the animals are dying and a local community of mine workers do whatever they can to survive. They suddenly face an even more overpowering ordeal when all the baboons in the area, approximately 90.000, herd together and launch spontaneous attacks against the humans in their quest for food. "In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro" is a fairly odd and unusual 80's horror movie, since it doesn't aim for mindless shocks or bloody set-pieces, but merely thrives on atmosphere and educational values. The first half hour is really slow and moody, but this is mostly done to illustrate the atmosphere of drought and despair they characters find themselves trapped in. Once the baboons go on their virulent murder sprees, the film becomes more adventurous and horrific (with images of ripped off limbs and half-eaten faces) but still the violence never becomes gratuitous or overly exploitative. The make-up effects are effective and big kudos to the animal trainers, because a lot of footage was filmed using real animals. The mechanical baboons, used during the more complicated attack scenes, are definitely convincing as well. This mainly African-produced film features two international stars delivering more than adequate performances, namely Timothy Bottoms as a park supervisor (and kind of looking like a big ape himself, what with the ferocious beard) and John Rhys-Davies as the demanding mine owner. "In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro" is a good and original film, naturally benefiting the most of the wonderful scenery and exterior filming locations, but also boosting a unique storyline and multiple moments of great suspense.
In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro
BandSAboutMovies31 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The only movie directed by producer Raju Patel, this is the story of Jack Ringtree (Timothy Bottoms) and Chris Tucker (John Rhys-Davies) in Namanga, Kenya as they try to figure out a tribe of baboons that are capturing and killing people.
The film has this in the credits: "The film you have just seen is a fictionalized account of a true incident which took place in Africa during the serious drought in 1984. The producers wish to make it known that not a single animal was mistreated during the making of this motion picture. On completion of filming the Baboons were rehabilitated to their natural surroundings. The Baboons were captured under the supervision of the Kenyan Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife from the areas where they had been a nuisance to the local population."
This is kind of like a zombie movie except, you know, with baboons. I wish I could say it was more exciting and wonder how a movie filled with human eating baboons can be slow, but there you have it. At least it has Irene Miracle from Inferno and Night Train Murders in it.
The film has this in the credits: "The film you have just seen is a fictionalized account of a true incident which took place in Africa during the serious drought in 1984. The producers wish to make it known that not a single animal was mistreated during the making of this motion picture. On completion of filming the Baboons were rehabilitated to their natural surroundings. The Baboons were captured under the supervision of the Kenyan Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife from the areas where they had been a nuisance to the local population."
This is kind of like a zombie movie except, you know, with baboons. I wish I could say it was more exciting and wonder how a movie filled with human eating baboons can be slow, but there you have it. At least it has Irene Miracle from Inferno and Night Train Murders in it.
Realistic and terrifying!
paulclaassen9 July 2022
We've certainly seen our share of killer primate movies. From 'Monkey Shines: An Experiment in fear' to 'Link', 'Shakma' and 'In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro'. (I'm not mentioning 'Congo' and 'King Kong' here because they weren't real animals). 'In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro' is undoubtedly one of the most realistic and terrifying of all.
Based on fact, the film depicts the moment when thousands of baboons turned to humans as food substitute during a drought. Entirely filmed on location in Kenya, this adds to the realism of the movie (so sad to think 'filmed on location' will soon be a thing of the past with the ever-growing use of CGI...).
Timothy Bottoms stars as ranger Jack Ringtree, whose wife Lee (Irene Miracle) comes to visit him begging to come home. Her timing couldn't have been worse, as all hell is about to break loose. Nearby, a mining company run by Chris Tucker (John Rhys-Davies) encounters several problems while running out of contract time, but things are about to get much worse as the baboons descent on the small town.
The attack scenes are brutal, realistic and simply terrifying. The use of real baboons makes it all the more scarier and the suspense is nail-biting. This is the stuff nightmares are made of!
'In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro' is one of my all-time favourite and most memorable 80's horror films.
Would I watch it again? Absolutely!
Based on fact, the film depicts the moment when thousands of baboons turned to humans as food substitute during a drought. Entirely filmed on location in Kenya, this adds to the realism of the movie (so sad to think 'filmed on location' will soon be a thing of the past with the ever-growing use of CGI...).
Timothy Bottoms stars as ranger Jack Ringtree, whose wife Lee (Irene Miracle) comes to visit him begging to come home. Her timing couldn't have been worse, as all hell is about to break loose. Nearby, a mining company run by Chris Tucker (John Rhys-Davies) encounters several problems while running out of contract time, but things are about to get much worse as the baboons descent on the small town.
The attack scenes are brutal, realistic and simply terrifying. The use of real baboons makes it all the more scarier and the suspense is nail-biting. This is the stuff nightmares are made of!
'In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro' is one of my all-time favourite and most memorable 80's horror films.
Would I watch it again? Absolutely!
Michele Carey's final acting performance.
abrltw13 December 2018
Michele returned to Hollywood for one final appearance after a short hiatus to raise her son as he was a high school student at the time of the films production.
Michele was excited to travel to Kenya for the filming but was disappointed with its final presentation.
Michele officially retired from acting within days of returning to her home in California.
Michele passed away on November 21st, 2018 at the age of 75 having never returned to her acting career.
Michele was excited to travel to Kenya for the filming but was disappointed with its final presentation.
Michele officially retired from acting within days of returning to her home in California.
Michele passed away on November 21st, 2018 at the age of 75 having never returned to her acting career.
A cool twist on a zombie movie... with monkeys! Also based on true events.
squirrel_burst19 February 2015
"In The Shadow of Kilimanjaro" has a lot of good things going for it. The story, like every script that is based on true events, has some facts embellished but is convincing and flows well. The basic premise is that in Kenya in 1984, there was this "perfect storm" of events that lead to a terrifying spectacle. A severe drought killed off much of the vegetation and small animals in the country. What it didn't kill were thousands of baboons, which eventually turned into hungry mobs, devouring anything in their path, including humans.
The animal training and the shots of wildlife are really amazing, lending a lot of credibility to the story. There are literally hundreds of animals on the screen and you think to yourself that the shots of these apes all running in one direction must have been stock footage or computer effects but no. There was extensive work when the film was made to train all of these animals to perform for some key scenes in the movie that are quite impressive.
The film almost plays like a zombie film, with hordes of man-eating creatures who can't be reasoned with just waiting for the time to strike and in that aspect the film can be quite effective. Where it doesn't quite work is that the film doesn't go far enough into the horror genre, with many shots of potentially shocking attacks being abruptly cut. This might have been done for budgetary reasons, but nonetheless they leave you wanting so much more than they deliver. The ending also comes very abruptly and isn't quite as satisfying as it should be. The film is nevertheless quite good and if you're a fan of zombie films, this is one of those stories that didn't want to be a variation on the genre, but ended up being on. If you've ever wanted to see a good animal-based horror story, look no further. (On VHS, October 5, 2012)
The animal training and the shots of wildlife are really amazing, lending a lot of credibility to the story. There are literally hundreds of animals on the screen and you think to yourself that the shots of these apes all running in one direction must have been stock footage or computer effects but no. There was extensive work when the film was made to train all of these animals to perform for some key scenes in the movie that are quite impressive.
The film almost plays like a zombie film, with hordes of man-eating creatures who can't be reasoned with just waiting for the time to strike and in that aspect the film can be quite effective. Where it doesn't quite work is that the film doesn't go far enough into the horror genre, with many shots of potentially shocking attacks being abruptly cut. This might have been done for budgetary reasons, but nonetheless they leave you wanting so much more than they deliver. The ending also comes very abruptly and isn't quite as satisfying as it should be. The film is nevertheless quite good and if you're a fan of zombie films, this is one of those stories that didn't want to be a variation on the genre, but ended up being on. If you've ever wanted to see a good animal-based horror story, look no further. (On VHS, October 5, 2012)
One of the best killer nature films
QueenoftheGoons29 June 2020
Dad had this on a VHS tape and I've worn it out. Can't find it on DVD but its a really good movie. But I'm into this. Killer baboons is original. The music is superb and the people are likeable expect the women and the main guy. Best part is when the truck gets a flat and the baboons are watching from the mountain. Really good movie.
So bad it's good??
hagerp15 October 2021
I have never seen this movie. When it came out in 1985, I had just moved to L. A. and read a capsule review of it in a publication called "The L. A. Weekly". After reading this review, I thought seriously about taking it in. I have since regretted that I didn't.
I am something of a devotee of "bad" movies. For example, much of Larry Buchanan's output falls into the so-bad-it's-good category. Normally, I'd see these movies on TV but about half of L. A.'s business was/is movies and I ultimately came to realize that it was possible to see some quite inventive, first-run dreck at theaters there. I recall one instance when I went to a nominally bad movie being shown in only one seedy theater located in West Hollywood. There were only seven people in the theater, including me. One of these was an apparently drunk guy sitting in the front row who periodically emitted random screams unrelated to the action on the screen. Really enhanced the experience. But, when Shadow of Kilimanjaro was out, I didn't realize the joys that awaited me attending bad movies as they were intended to be experienced: in a movie theater. I was likely operating in economic mode and figured I should save my money.
So, given that I'd only just started my new job and was in a somewhat impecunious state, I decided to forego seeing this opus. But I must share the review that sorely tempted me to spend a few bucks on it so many years ago. The following is a fairly close paraphrase: "Movie supposedly 'based on fact' about 90,000 rampaging baboons killing tourists in Africa. If 90,000 baboons on 90,000 typewriters attempted to write 'King Lear', this would have been their first draft."
Still haven't seen the movie...perhaps if I do, I will return and deliver a proper review.
I am something of a devotee of "bad" movies. For example, much of Larry Buchanan's output falls into the so-bad-it's-good category. Normally, I'd see these movies on TV but about half of L. A.'s business was/is movies and I ultimately came to realize that it was possible to see some quite inventive, first-run dreck at theaters there. I recall one instance when I went to a nominally bad movie being shown in only one seedy theater located in West Hollywood. There were only seven people in the theater, including me. One of these was an apparently drunk guy sitting in the front row who periodically emitted random screams unrelated to the action on the screen. Really enhanced the experience. But, when Shadow of Kilimanjaro was out, I didn't realize the joys that awaited me attending bad movies as they were intended to be experienced: in a movie theater. I was likely operating in economic mode and figured I should save my money.
So, given that I'd only just started my new job and was in a somewhat impecunious state, I decided to forego seeing this opus. But I must share the review that sorely tempted me to spend a few bucks on it so many years ago. The following is a fairly close paraphrase: "Movie supposedly 'based on fact' about 90,000 rampaging baboons killing tourists in Africa. If 90,000 baboons on 90,000 typewriters attempted to write 'King Lear', this would have been their first draft."
Still haven't seen the movie...perhaps if I do, I will return and deliver a proper review.
More like "In The Bottom Of The Barrel"
Wizard-816 November 2003
If you've ever wondered why the Scotti Brothers music company didn't last long when they tried their hand in cinema, this movie would be a good place to start. It's hard to believe this actually got released widely enough that Siskel and Ebert took the time to review it on their show (both giving it thumbs down.) Poorly photographed, atrociously edited, and with a plot that's more of an idea than an actual story, given how little is done with anything that comes up. The gore sequences, while explicit, come off as a desperate attempt to entertain more than anything else. There is one eye-catching visual (during the flat tire sequence) that will get your attention and make you wonder how they did it. But unless you also happen to like seeing talented actors of some fame get humiliated, it's not worth the effort to see. Though afterwards you will be able to say truthfully, "I saw Timothy Bottoms' bottom!"
Hungry baboons attack
lor_5 March 2023
My review was written in April 1986 after watching the film at a Times Square screening room.
Filmed over two years ago in Kenya, "In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro" is an old-fashioned adventure thriller in the borderline horror genre of a last-stand-at-the-house against predators, previously essayed in such films as "Kingdom of the Spiders", "Savage Harvest" and "Roar". Box office outlook is weak.
A famine has caused the 90,000 baboons on a Kenya wildlife reservation to begin banding together an preying on humans (film claims on-screen to be base on a true story, but the 1984 date given is impossible). Wildlife ranger John (Jack to his friends) Ringtree -played by Timothy Bottoms, wants to evacuate the area of about 200 people but the government and manager of the local mine Chris Tucker (John Rhys-Davies) view him as an alarmist and oppose his efforts. As usual in corny horror films like this one, the cast (especially female) is given to wandering alone in the bush long after word of animal attacks has been announced, making them easy prey.
Eventually the danger comes close to home and all survivors huddle together in a hotel run by Michele Carey. The last stand against the marauding animals is successful and a convenient rainstorm spells the end of the drought and the problem.
Hokey film benefits from atmospheric location photography, but suffers from sometimes inaudible dialog recorded in direct sound. Rhys-Davies uses a prop-cigar and a new accent in a fun job as a villain, but by the final reels he has become a true-blue good guy, with only the baboons as hissable targets. Bottoms is merely okay as the bland hero, Irene Miracle is extremely glamorous as his "please come home with met to America" nagging wife (in a role reserved decades ago in these films for Elsa Martinelli) and it's fun to see 1960s starlet Michele Carey again, as the friendly neighborhood hotelier. Leonard Trolley is so hammy as an old British colonial type recalling the good old days that one wishes he had been fed to the baboons early on.
Director Raju Patel substitutes gore effects for suspense in an episodic presentation that fails to knit individual scenes together. Unconvincing matte shots are used to show hundreds of baboons storming down from the hills, while more manageable stagings of a dozen or o animals are used to enact the attacks on humans. Situation inevitably conjures up memories of Cy Endfield's minor 1965 classic "Sands of the Kalahari", but instead of that film's genuinely chilling climax of the baboons descending in long shot on the surviving protagonist (which left the horror to one's imagination), we now get severed limbs, half-eaten faces and torsos and other ineffective gimmicks.
Filmed over two years ago in Kenya, "In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro" is an old-fashioned adventure thriller in the borderline horror genre of a last-stand-at-the-house against predators, previously essayed in such films as "Kingdom of the Spiders", "Savage Harvest" and "Roar". Box office outlook is weak.
A famine has caused the 90,000 baboons on a Kenya wildlife reservation to begin banding together an preying on humans (film claims on-screen to be base on a true story, but the 1984 date given is impossible). Wildlife ranger John (Jack to his friends) Ringtree -played by Timothy Bottoms, wants to evacuate the area of about 200 people but the government and manager of the local mine Chris Tucker (John Rhys-Davies) view him as an alarmist and oppose his efforts. As usual in corny horror films like this one, the cast (especially female) is given to wandering alone in the bush long after word of animal attacks has been announced, making them easy prey.
Eventually the danger comes close to home and all survivors huddle together in a hotel run by Michele Carey. The last stand against the marauding animals is successful and a convenient rainstorm spells the end of the drought and the problem.
Hokey film benefits from atmospheric location photography, but suffers from sometimes inaudible dialog recorded in direct sound. Rhys-Davies uses a prop-cigar and a new accent in a fun job as a villain, but by the final reels he has become a true-blue good guy, with only the baboons as hissable targets. Bottoms is merely okay as the bland hero, Irene Miracle is extremely glamorous as his "please come home with met to America" nagging wife (in a role reserved decades ago in these films for Elsa Martinelli) and it's fun to see 1960s starlet Michele Carey again, as the friendly neighborhood hotelier. Leonard Trolley is so hammy as an old British colonial type recalling the good old days that one wishes he had been fed to the baboons early on.
Director Raju Patel substitutes gore effects for suspense in an episodic presentation that fails to knit individual scenes together. Unconvincing matte shots are used to show hundreds of baboons storming down from the hills, while more manageable stagings of a dozen or o animals are used to enact the attacks on humans. Situation inevitably conjures up memories of Cy Endfield's minor 1965 classic "Sands of the Kalahari", but instead of that film's genuinely chilling climax of the baboons descending in long shot on the surviving protagonist (which left the horror to one's imagination), we now get severed limbs, half-eaten faces and torsos and other ineffective gimmicks.
Fans of rampaging animal movies....don't bother!
barnabyrudge22 February 2002
A ridiculous story of a drought in Africa which results in 90,000 baboons deciding to attack humans as their only way of getting food. Yes, that's right, 90,000 red-assed baboons munch their way through the cast during this silly 97 minute horror flick. There's a fair bit of needless gore, which doesn't help, and lots of build ups which peter out without delivering an exciting or frightening pay-off. The only decent thing about this movie is John Rhys-Davies (who was so great in Raiders of the Lost Ark), who injects a bit of interest in a somewhat underwritten role.
Next time, choose a scarier looking animal.
boris-2620 November 2001
The basic plot of IN THE SHADOW OF KILIMANJARO (1986) is that an army of crazed, homicidal babboons are killing folks left and right in the middle of nowhere. The thing the filmmakers should of realised is that babboons always look kind of bored. An example comes in one scene where a movie character has a flat tire in the desert. We cut to shots of yawning, pre-occupied looking monkeys watch him from afar. They seem to be saying "Hoo-Hummm, I dunno, should I kill him? I don't know, rather sit here and pick flies off my fur. (Yawn....) Okay. Let me go down and kill 'em." We had a good laugh with this one.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
