Prince of Bel Air (TV Movie 1986) Poster

(1986 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Typical TV Gloss!
JohnHowardReid15 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Prince of Bel Air (1986) is a typical TV movie with pretty, well- dressed but somewhat shallow people, lots of talk but nothing much to digest, bright color photography that is so unshaded that it just becomes boring and monotonous, and ho-hum situations that suddenly accelerate and/or change course just before the commercials. The photography is always bright with shimmering colors but very rarely atmospheric of course, and the direction could justly be described as always very competent, but nevertheless always monotonously routine. Director Chuck Braverman has worked mainly in TV and is noted for bringing in glossy-looking projects like this one right on time. I'll admit that I was mildly engrossed in the story even though I knew that it was all going to end more or less pleasantly with nothing much said or done to make viewers feel the least bit uncomfortable with the plot, the characters or the dialogue.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fresh Prince (spoilers)
vertigo_1418 May 2005
Prince of Bel Air is pure 80s, and completely driven by the typical type-casted efforts of Mark Harmon as Robin Prince, a carefree pool man's who's benefits of the job include not a pension plan, but rather, a slick tan and a knack for wooing the ladies. For the summer, he takes on his financier's son, a high school graduate named Justin (Patrick Labyorteaux looking quite gorgeous), mentoring the virgin young lad in what he knows well: swimming pools and women. Although, while Justin assimilates to Robin's habits of this sort, old Robin may be having a change of heart when he falls in love with Justin's cousin, Jamie (Kiersty Allie), a woman who partially doesn't seem to mind Robin's reluctance for monogamy, even when he is so brutally honest about it (of course, this changes). So, most of the movie is simply a guy figuring out whether commitment is really such a terrible word.

The movie is really one that is so intent on delivering all of that Harmon charm and humor, the guy that's everybody's buddy kind of character he is so well known to play, especially in his choice of late 80s films, but the movie overall lacks much conflict in trying to impress this on the viewer. While there are some rifts between Robin and the characters of his old lifestyle (collectively known as "the guys") and those of his possible new lifestyle ("Jamie"), there is simply not that much to make you think a guy like Robin would care much about it. He never seems so sincere. It's just like, oh, he's rethinking the whole thing, so you'll have to expunge some sympathy for him, without ever really having much reason to buy into it. We shouldn't have to, and neither should he simply because there just doesn't seem like enough reason to. The relationship with Jamie is delicate at best.

Aside from that however, I would recommend watching it for fans of pure 80s movies. It is no more than a light love story of sorts that celebrates a cast of well-tanned Californians. In the year following this made-for-TV movie, Harmon will have teamed up again with Laboryteaux ("Justin"), Dean Cameron ("Willard"), and Kirstie Alley ("Jamie") for the Carl Reiner comedy, Summer School. It may be worth it just to see it for those familiar faces.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Prince learns how to be a Prince Charming
inkblot1129 August 2006
Robin Prince (Mark Harmon) believes the world is his oyster. He owns and operates a pool cleaning business, which he loves. After all, not only does he get to work in the sun, he has access to some of the rich but desperate housewives of Bel Air. They certainly do love their pool man and he returns the affection. In his off hours, Robin hangs out with his best buds and romances single women, too. However, he is getting to be a bit old for the perpetual surfer image he has concocted. And, his head turns counterclockwise when he meets lovely Jamie (Kirstie Alley), a talented artist with scruples. What will be ultimately important to him, his lifestyle or his great affection for Jamie? This movie has some nice statements to make about choices and changes. Not all men will turn into gentlemen, it's true, but stories about the ones who do are very welcome. Harmon and Alley are lovely and humorous folks and add much to the film's enjoyment. Vaughn does a good job as a loathsome businessman. The California setting is utterly gorgeous and so are the costumes. Jamie's artwork is also quite stunning. If you think you've seen every romantic drama out there but have missed this one, do take time to view it. Although it was made nearly 20 years ago, its themes are as fresh as daisies and its tale of romance absolutely winning.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fluff, but pleasant fluff
Wizard-84 September 2011
Although "Prince Of Bel Air" was made twenty-five years ago, surprisingly the movie hasn't aged that badly. The fashions, lingo, and other culture traits the movie uses could for the most part be passed off the same way today. The movie is watchable for other reasons as well. One thing I liked about the movie was that all the characters come across as very likable. Sure, Harmon's character is kind of a womanizer, but he does have genuine feelings to the women he interacts with, and in the end he learns that being in a solid relationship is more fulfilling than just bouncing from one conquest to another. There isn't a lot of plot here, but the movie is made in a breezy fashion that carries you along to the end. It's decent entertainment when you are not in the mood to think very hard.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
a lot of fluff
sandcrab27728 January 2019
Come on, kirstie alley as a love interest was far fetched enough but adding katherine moffat was the highlight of the chest show ... all the usual dirtbag clowns were there like patrick labyorteaux, robert vaughn, dean cameron and don swayze for comic relief that wasn't funny ... pool boy indeed ... mark harmon won't ever grow up .. he'll always be a wisecracking smart mouthed jerk
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quality Southern Cal drama with Mark Harmon and Kirstie Alley
Wuchakk23 December 2020
Robin Prince (Mark Harmon) owns a pool maintenance business that serves the well-to-do citizens of Bel Air, California. He's handsome, charismatic, in his early 30s and enjoys the side-fruits of his labors, i.e. attractive housewives desperate for attention. While mentoring the teen (Patrick Labyorteaux) of a rich client (Robert Vaughn), he meets their stunning relative who challenges his playboy lifestyle (Kirstie Alley).

Although "Prince of Bel Air" debuted on ABC in the USA in January, 1986, it was released theatrically in Europe with the extra inclusion of a top nudity scene, as well as a little cussing. The ensuing video version is the R-rated Euro version, not the TV version. I point this out because "Prince of Bel Air" shouldn't be written off as "just a TV movie."

It's actually a quality drama/romance about coming of age, not just for the kid (Labyorteaux), but for Harmon's character too. He's 32-33, but still living like a freestyle frat boy and needs to grow up. In addition, the script throws in some insightful bits, like how Robin (Harmon) wisely changes his approach towards his unprofessional employees.

Sharp Kirstie Alley was certainly in her voluptuous prime; she has a stunning scene at the pool in a one-piece bathing suit. There are a handful of other beauties, including Katherine Moffat as Kelli and Deborah Harmon as a desperate housewife.

Four of the cast members (Harmon, Alley, Labyorteaux and Dean Cameron) would appear in "Summer School" the following year. It features the same general locations (the coastal Los Angeles area) and a romance between Harmon and Alley, but the stories are very different. This one came first and is a drama akin to "Lifeguard" (1976) whereas "Summer School" is more of a high school dramedy in the mold of "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" (1982).

Lastly, this movie has nothing to do with the ensuing 1990-1996 sitcom The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, but I'm sure the creators of that show were inspired by the title.

The film runs 1 hour, 35 minutes, and was shot in Los Angeles. The Bel Air district, by the way, is located just north of UCLA and northwest of Beverly Hills.

GRADE: B
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not bad but rather generic lightweight romance
dave13-114 February 2012
Before Summer School, Mark Harmon and Kirstie Alley teamed up for this made-for-TV romantic fable about a pool cleaning contractor who had it all: his own business, good looks and no shortage of female customers who wanted more than just their drains plumbed. But his all-American sex fantasy life gets complicated when Kirstie Alley shows up one day in one of his customer's pools. She's an artist, smart and interesting, and able to resist his boyish charm. To pursue her, he has to take stock of his life and lifestyle. Yep, pretty paint-by-numbers as these TV romances go, but at least everything is played for charm rather than cheap titillation. There is little comedy here, or much drama - it's mostly a character piece. The Bel Air setting is attractive and well- used, with lots of Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous visual appeal and both Harmon and Alley are great looking and likable in their roles. This is also a great reminder of how Kirstie Alley got to be a sex symbol 25 years ago, since nowadays she is mostly famous for being overweight. Your first glimpse of her in a swimsuit is one of those true WOW moments. Cautiously recommended, keep expectations low.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Worth Renting
qfal6 March 2001
Made for TV, this movie was good enough to get released as a video as well. I think it, along with "Thief of Hearts" are 2 movies that come to mind as being good representatives of life in California in the early 80s -- for the "cool" people anyway. You'll enjoy this movie if you watch it without too-high expectations. The movie has no real message, but does make some points about relationships. I liked the relationship the protagonist, played by Mark Harmon, had with the waitress, or rather, the relationship she had with him. She knew he was "too good" for her to be in a full-time relationship with but she was willing to let him use her sexually (not in a mean way) just to have a piece of his time. And she never complained, nor was she surprised, when he walked away. Such is real life.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed