Shoot to Kill (1988) Poster

(1988)

User Reviews

Review this title
72 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The way that action movies should be made.
barnabyrudge10 June 2004
Shoot To Kill (GB title: Deadly Pursuit) is a lively, fairly intelligent action film which benefits from good character development. Many post-1980 action films suffer because they are empty spectacles, full of boring stock characters and visually impressive/emotionally redundant stunts. However, this one is different. There are eight main characters (all of them well-realized) as well as a fundamentally exciting plot, sharp dialogue, and a spectacular mountain setting.

FBI agent Warren Stanton (Sidney Poitier) is desperate to track down a dangerous jewel thief following a botched hostage situation. He suspects that the thief has joined a five-man hiking party in the rugged wilderness near Spokane. Unfortunately, there is no way of contacting the hiking guide Sarah (Kirstie Alley) to warn her that a dangerous killer is among her group. Instead, Stanton has to put his trust in another mountain guide, rough and tough Jonathan Knox (Tom Berenger). The unlikely pair pursue the hiking group, hoping to reach them before the killer strikes again.

The film moves at a good pace. Interest is generated on several different fronts: the volatile relationship between Stanton and Knox; the intriguing guessing-game as to which member of the hiking party is actually the jewel thief/killer; the "race-against-time" tension (as soon as the hikers have entered Canada, the killer could dispose of them at any time). There is spectacular action, but it is not emphasised to such an overwhelming degree that other story threads are lost. Shoot To Kill is a very commendable action film and it is a pity that more films in the genre are not up to the same standard.
57 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
solid 80's thriller
SnoopyStyle6 April 2019
Warren Stantin (Sidney Poitier) is an FBI agent in San Francisco. A hostage situation goes wrong. The killer escapes with a bag of diamonds. Stantin follows a similar killing to the wilderness of Washington. He suspects the killer had surreptitiously joined a fishing expedition guided by Sarah Rennell (Kirstie Alley). Her partner Jonathan Knox (Tom Berenger) sets out to follow and is forced to take the city slicker G-man with him.

It's Sidney Poitier's first movie in over a decade. He hasn't lost a step. He is surprisingly funny at times. The fish out of water aspect is solid and fun. His most memorable scene is probably scaring away the bear. The killer is kept a mystery in a good way. That half is a fun little mystery. I would have preferred ending the movie in the woods. There are a couple of good ideas in the city. The car chase is nothing special but solidly 80's action. There is a good switch-a-roo that ties in with an earlier moment. I don't know about keeping Kristie Alley a hostage all through that part of the movie. It makes much more sense for the killer to kill any possible witnesses once he escaped to the city. Kristie becomes a hinderance during the escape. That's all the more reason to end the movie in the woods. The killer is incentivized to keep his hostage alive as long as he needs a guide. Overall, this is a solid 80's action thriller.
19 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Still great.
scottrob3623 August 2021
I haven't watched this since I was 15 years old in 1990 and I liked it then and 30 odd years later it's still a good watch. Much better than action/thrillers being made these days.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The first 45min sets it up nicely
royu27 June 2004
It think whoever wrote the script for this movie had the first half all planned out, but then didn't know where to go afterwards. The first 40 minutes or so is riveting, one of the greatest openings to a film you'll ever likely to see because it keeps you guessing, there's decoys thrown in and it throws up one big question, which one of the fishermen is the bad guy? I guessed wrong. Once his identity is revealed it all becomes a bit stock standard, other users have said that the bad guy question was answered too soon and i tend too agree, another 20 minutes or so would've helped, the fishermen tour is a fun part of the movie.

Despite it's slight decline in power at this point the directing and cinematography remain first class. The characters are believable, realistic, give good feedback and are easy to relate to. Character development in Shoot to Kill isn't matched by many others, simply first class. The script is laugh out loud witty at times and Poitier and Berenger gel well, but the acting does have it's poorer moments, as does the script. A couple of plot holes don't help. But look past some minor flaws and the movie is great, the curiously catchy soundtrack adds to the movies feel, and the scenery is documentary spectacular and also gives a good sense of it's intimidation. Definitely a must watch for thriller fans. Everyone I've shown it too loved it, and everyone I know who's seen it loved it. Highly underrated, yet highly enjoyable.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Some Inconvenient Allies
bkoganbing14 January 2008
After an eleven year absence from the screen, Sidney Poitier chose to return in an action/adventure film where he plays an FBI agent in search of a killer.

He's got good reason to want this guy bad. His quarry is ruthless and kills without mercy. Poitier loses a hostage and the ransom he's asked for. But some good detective work has traced the man to a remote part of the Pacific Northwest.

Where the perpetrator has killed again and joined a party of dry fly fishermen being guided by Kirstie Alley into the rugged mountains. No place for a city kid like Poitier, says mountaineer/hermit Tom Berenger who has the prerequisite skills to get the job done. These two are forced into an alliance of inconvenience.

The best thing I liked about Shoot To Kill is the guessing game we play for the identity of the perpetrator. Any one of the five men in Kirstie Alley's party could have been the killer. Look at the cast list and you'll recognize a few names who've played some pretty loathsome villains in the past. The identity is revealed suddenly and quite shockingly.

What I didn't like with Shoot To Kill is the fact that the final confrontation with the perpetrator is in big city Vancouver where he's escaped with Alley. He needed her in the woods, not any longer, she should have wound up dead. And Berenger and Poitier should have confronted him in the woods.

That script decision made the climax a rather ordinary one that you see in a whole lot of police chase films. Still all the players do fine here, my favorite being Kirstie Alley as the woods smart guide.
26 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good eighties cop thriller
The_Void29 June 2007
Deadly Pursuit certainly has it's fair share of problems, but as an entertaining little action thriller; it stands up well to criticism, as while some of the dialogue, situations and character drawings don't exactly ring true; the film moves quickly and director Roger Spottiswoode does a good job of ensuring that the film is easy viewing and never becomes boring. Deadly Pursuit is something of a film of two halves; it starts off as a gritty cop thriller, and then mutates into a survivalist themed chase movie. The plot is fairly standard at first, as we witness a man being caught robbing a diamond store. The plot thickens when, after some interrogation from the arresting officers, it turns out that the thief actually owns the store! We then learn that he's stealing the diamonds to pay a kidnapper for the release of his wife. FBI agent Warren Stantin manages to chase the kidnapper down, but he gets away with the diamonds and flees into a forest near Canada; thus meaning that Agent Stantin must chase the killer into the woods, with the help of a rugged local who knows the area.

The film does have a number of problems - sometimes, for example, it seems to just jump from one scene to the next without much in the way of a connection. This does keep things moving, but the film can feel a bit disjointed because of it. Still, the plot flows fairly well and enough different angles are created to keep things interesting. The film features a decent cast, headed up by Sidney Poitier. Poitier's character changes a lot through the film, and while the actor sometimes looks a bit silly, he does seem to manage this well. He is joined by Tom Berenger, who also gives a decent performance in his role, while the rest of the cast is filled out by the likes of Clancy Brown, Kirstie Alley and Andrew Robinson. Perhaps the best thing about this movie is the fact that we don't know who the killer is for so long, which builds suspense - and mystery, and the film also carries off a nice twist little twist with the choice of actors surrounding the killer. Overall, I can't really say that Deadly Pursuit is one of the best films of its type - but it's certainly a very good thriller and I recommend watching it!
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Glad I stumbled onto this one
Mr-Fusion28 July 2016
Well, this movie's a pleasant surprise; pretty much on every front. "Shoot to Kill" is a taut thriller to to bottom, but I think what sets this apart from other buddy movies is that it crosses genres. It's not just two disparate men on a dangerous mission, but there's also a manhunt and a wilderness movie thrown in for good measure. Still, Poitier and Berenger have a solid chemistry, and their road to mutual acceptance is a rocky one. It's a good cast throughout with a charming Kirstie Alley (to be fair, I haven't (yet) seen "Cheers" and I only really know her as a Vulcan). NIce scenery, too; I got a real "First Blood" feeling with that Pacific Northwest locale. I'm not sure why I hadn't heard of this movie until today, but either way, it's great.

7/10
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Lot To Like.....Except The Ending
ccthemovieman-116 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
It wasn't until my fourth viewing of this film (and first on widescreen DVD) that (1) I finally remembered who the killer was as soon as I saw him and (2) lost a little regard for this otherwise very entertaining thriller because of the implausible ending.

It's a different kind of adventure story/crime thriller in that the beginning and ending scenes are both in big cities and the long middle part is in the Northwest wilderness. There is some great mountain scenery to enjoy as we tag along with two groups: one which has the killer and his hostage (a slim Kirstie Alley!) and another with an FBI man (Sidney Poitier) and his guide (Tom Berenger), who is the hostage's boyfriend.

I had no problems with any of this story until the last 20 minutes when both parties reached Vancouver. Then, all credibility went out the window as Berenger is allowed to be side-by-side with Poitier as the latter and the killer shoot it out in various parts of the city. It gets worse as it goes on with Poitier a dead duck a couple of times but he never dies. Only Superman could have survived what he did, but he's the "good guy " so he makes it in the end. A little restraint in that ending would have kept this movie just great.

Still, if you can put up with the ending the film still offers a lot of suspense, a lot of mystery, interesting action and scenery.....in other words, a lot to like.
28 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A solid and exciting chase thriller about a relentless pursuit against an ominous killer on loose
ma-cortes15 December 2020
Thriiling and moving thriller with unstopped action from start to finish . It deals with a streetwise FBI agent determined to track down a cruel series killer who at whatever cost wants to get a valuable loot , including killing and kidnapping . Vengefully , Poitier follows the trail up into the remote mountains on the Canadian border, a far place where a polish cop is comically out of water . As the chase against the homicidal maniac leads to the mountains of the Pacific Northwest , where the tough Inspector teams with tracker Tom Berenguer , while his sweetheart , Kirstie Ally , another mountain guide is held hostage .

This tense and nail-biting thriller is packed with as much taut action as the storyline will allow , but let down at times . Sidney Poitier returns to the big screen after a ten-year absence to portray a city-wise FBI enforcer similar to his previous Inspector Tibbs , and here as the urban fish unfamiliar with the rural pond . While Tom Berenguer does well as the two-fisted mountainer who will stop at nothing to find his kidnapped girlfriend : Kirstie Alley . All the clichés clock in , characterisation is simple and cardboard, but the film works enough . It contains an agreeable chemistry between the two leads : Sidney Poitier and Tom Berenguer providing sympathy and humor . They are very well accompanied by a fine support cast with plenty of familiar faces, such as : Kirstie Ally, Clancy Brown, Richard Masur , Andrew Robinson, Frederick Coffin, among others .

It packs a picturesque cinematography shot on stunning locations in Vancouver , Briitsh Columbia , Canada , Norhwest Pacific , splendidly photographed by cameraman by Michael Chapman. As well as atmospheric and stirring musical score by John Scott , though composed by means of synthesizer . The motion picture was competently directed by Roger Spottiswoode though it draws some flaws and gasps in about equal number . Robert has made nice and successful films of all kinds of genres , such as : Terror Train, Under Fire, The Best of Times , Turner and Hooch, Air America, Stop or My Mother will Shot , And the Band Played On, Tomorrow Never Dies, God's Favorite, The 6th Day and several others . The flick will appeal to Sidney Poitier and Tom Berenguer fans . Well worth seeing
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent action-adventure flick
ODDBear6 September 2006
Sidney Poitier's return to movies (after a 10 year absence) was this wilderness action flick which is fun all the way.

FBI Agent Warren Stantin (Poitier) trails a nasty serial killer to the wilderness and enlists the aid of an experienced mountain guide Jonathan Knox (Tom Berenger). The killer has "hitched" a ride with 4 other campers who are being led through the mountains by Knox's girlfriend (Kirstie Alley).

Well written script, first rate action sequences and solid acting by Berenger and Poitier make Shoot to Kill an excellent action-adventure yarn that's sure to please most. The opening 50 minutes or so are airtight and then it loses a bit of steam but on the whole it's damn good overall.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Not So Serious Thriller
JoelChamp8529 March 2021
A fun adventure/thriller that leads a FBI agent into the wilderness with a mountain-man guide to hunt down a cold blooded killer who is on the run with a bag of stolen diamonds. The acting isn't as serious I'd like in a thriller, but Berenger is, as always, a pleasure to watch. I really like the wilderness locations and the things the crazy killer does along the way.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Perfect Poitier and Believable Berenger
The_Rook17 October 2002
Sidney Poitier, who was 61 at the time, and Tom Berenger both do exceptional jobs in this movie. Poitier as an FBI agent and Berenger is a mountain guide. Great scenery in Washington state includes Pugent Sound. This is one of the best movies I have ever seen let alone quite possibly the best in this genre. A good blend of action with the chase of the killer from city to mountains to city along with mental clue teasers. If you like movies like "Along Came a Spider", "Manhunter", or "U.S. Marshals" you will enjoy this movie. Well paced with good supporting cast, sets, and music. The killer is not revealed until late in the movie so the suspense is excellent through out it. I hope this comes out on DVD soon.
26 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Country Mouse, City Mouse
view_and_review26 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I'll watch anything starring Sidney Poitier. He's an incredible actor and an historical figure. He was the first African American male to win an Oscar for best actor for his performance in "Lilies of the Field" (1963) (an incredible movie by the way). And he was nominated for Best Actor for his performance in "The Defiant Ones" (1959)--an even more incredible movie. So watching "Shoot to Kill" was an automatic yes.

The movie starts off smashingly. A dangerous and intelligent thief orchestrated an escape with two pounds of cut diamonds. He headed for Canada and was cut off by what he thought was a police barricade. He was close enough to the Canadian border that he decided to hike it with a guide.

FBI agent Warren Stantin (Sidney Poitier) was determined to catch this guy after he killed a hostage and escaped right under the nose of the FBI and SFPD. Like the killer, he would also need a guide, and that's where Jonathan Knox (Tom Berenger) came in. The two of them were like many Hollywood law enforcement tandems, they were polar opposites and they didn't get along initially. Knox was a mountain man and was intimately familiar with the outdoors. Stantin was a city boy and knew nothing about roughing it.

I thought the movie played out really well until the end. The killer was smart and vicious up until his hostage was Sarah (Kirstie Alley). If he was to have stayed in character, then he would've killed Sarah the moment he was out of the woods because he had no more need for her. For some reason he held on to her like precious cargo as though he would need her later. The fact is, once he was back in civilization he could've grabbed anyone as a hostage.

That's my only quivel of any significance. Other than that I loved the movie. Poitier was excellent as always and the plot was a fine one.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Straightforward actioner/buddy movie
I had to write a review of this film after reading another comment saying that this is Sidney Poitier's best movie. Poitier had just returned from over a decade's break in film acting and he is clearly creaky here. 11 of his films are mentioned in Wikipedia and they don't include this. 5 of his films are on the AFI's list of top 100 inspiring movies, again, not including this. Berenger and Poitier, rube and city slicker set out to hunt down a dangerous psychopath before he crosses the border to Canada. Some of the attempts at comedy in this film clearly fail and Berenger and Poitier's bonding was cringeworthy and awkward (not helped by a completely bland script). Kirstie Alley (as the hostage) was underused, and almost entirely ignored when she was on screen. Some attempt at suspense is made, for example when you're meant to try and guess which of 5 men on a fishing trip is the murderer (all of them are type-cast villains). I understand that this is the entire appeal to most fans out there. I guessed who it was and I wasn't really trying hard.

If you're a Berenger fan, and want some action, watch the Sniper (1993), you even get to see Billy Zane strutting his stuff.
10 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A triumph!
bobjohndave29 July 2002
I would just like to start off this review by giving Sidney Poitier the recognition he deserves. He is most definitely one of the most distinguished and talented actors of our generation and a role model for all aspiring actors! Now, on with the review. I first saw this movie during a vacation to the beach with my friend and his family. I had seen several other Poitier efforts such as "In the Heat of the Night" and "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?",and I stumbled upon this thriller while watching television on one of the nights that it rained. I stopped at TBS and I'm certainly glad that I did! This movie is one of best Poitier movies I've ever viewed! This film incorporates comedy into a genre the usually takes itself a little too seriously. The movie has an overall seriousness about it, but there are a few cheeky moments between Poitier and Berenger. Some of these comedic moments include: a scene where Berenger and Poitier are in an ice tunnel during a snow storm. Berenger is laying on top of Poitier to keep him from freezing to death. Poitier asks something like : "What are you queer or something?!" and Berenger says something like: "What's the matter? Haven't you ever heard about us mountain boys?" Another funny moment comes when Poitier is trying to scale a wall even though he is exhausted. Berenger is at the top trying to convince him to go back. The look on Poitier's face is more than enough to inspire a chuckle. The performances, the direction, and the cinematography are all well done in this film. The beautiful mountain landscapes inspire sort of a wistful feeling that can often be distracting. I'll also give a thumbs up to the sound effects department of this film. The sound of the rope snapping when Berenger was plummeting from the cable extending across the gorge was enough to make me wince with agony. This movie was executed well and my only complaint was that the villain's identity was revealed earlier than I thought it should have been. All in all I think it was a solid effort that I think anyone who is a fan of suspense films will enjoy. Your best bet as far as renting this movie is to go to a hole-in-the-wall movie rental store that never throws any movie away because, as other reviews have said, it is very hard to find. You may get lucky once in a blue moon and catch it on TBS or TNT, but the edited for TV versions are never as good as the uncut versions. If none of the mom and pop movie rental outlets still carry it, go to blockbuster and demand that they order this movie for you! This movie is a definite must-see for any fan of the suspense genre! FINAL SCORE 9/10
31 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Much More Fun Than I Expected
damianphelps8 February 2021
This was a really good movie I enjoyed it from start to finish.

The setting is good, especially when they hit the wilderness, the story is good and they find the perfect balance between having enough story without getting stuck in unnecessary detail that would bog it down.

The movie is also surprisingly funny.

Its a good time :)
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
entertaining action movie
myriamlenys10 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Although the movie is set in a contemporary setting, it is basically a traditional Western in a classical vein. A callous criminal commits a crime and tries to escape by crossing the border, even if this means travelling through the wilderness and shooting inoffensive citizens ; a grizzled old sheriff is determined to catch the miscreant and bring him to justice, if necessary with the aid of some unwilling instant-deputies or guides. What follows is a long pursuit, where the brave sheriff and his helpers need to overcome both natural perils and the evil cunning of the criminal.

"Shoot to kill" is quite entertaining, with good acting, ingenious stunts (watch out for the Bridge from Hell) and ravishing scenery. I get the impression that it has been largely forgotten - undeservedly so, since it is well worth watching.

Sadly there is a hugely illogical plot twist, or plot evolution, which undermines the internal coherence of the story. This illogical twist occurs 4/5ths into the movie and influences the ending. You'll notice it when you see it...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
How's the weather up there!
kapelusznik185 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** After a ten year absence Sidney Poitier is back in front of the cameras as big time FBI Agent Warren Stantin with a new pair of thermal underwear as he searches in the great American North-West not for "Bigfoot" but for a killer whom he let escape or slip out of his fingers after a kidnap murderer back in San Francisco. In what looks like a re-make of the 1958 film the "Defient Ones" but as good guys and not being handcuffed together Poitier as Agent Stantin and his partner rugged mountain man Jonathon Knox played by a very fit and in tip top shape, for what's expected of him in the movie,Tom Berenger are out looking for an escaped murderer and kidnapper Steve-no last name given in the credits-played by Clancy Brown who hooked up with a group of people out to climb the mountains and enjoy the wonders of nature.

With the movie being filmed in the politically correct 1980's the fact that Stantin is black as well as the boss and Knox is white and a bit of a redneck race was almost totally absent in the two mens relationships but replaced with Stantin being a big time city FBI man and Knox being an almost hermit like mountain or country boy. This caused a lot of tension between the two who earned each others respect by saving each others lives by the time the movie ended.

****SPOILERS**** After Steve murderer all the hikers he was with he took their guide Sarah Rennell, Christie Alley, not just hostage but to help him find his way to Canada where he plans to spend the some $3,000,000.00 in diamonds that he stole back in SF. As we soon found out Sarah is Knox's girlfriend that makes his tracking down Steve a very personal matter. The movie end up in Vancouver Canada with both our hero's after getting a shave shower and new clean set of clothes, the old ones stunk like hell, finally tracking down the elusive Steve that results in a wild car chase as well as shoot out on a ferry that ends almost at the bottom of Vancouver Bay. With Knox again saving, for the second time, Stantin life who was about to go under for the third time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Tough thriller delivers the goods
Leofwine_draca6 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A slick and efficient wilderness thriller utilising a few great actors to strong effect, DEADLY PURSUIT is one of my favourite crime films of the 1980s. The story is simplicity in itself, a classic odd-couple pairing as inner-city FBI agent Sidney Poitier is forced to team up with a survivalist type to track down a ruthless murderer. This is the type of film that you don't really watch for the intricacies of the storyline, as it's kept very simple and straightforward, but to enjoy great outdoor photography, a sharp script and commanding performances.

Poitier returned from a decade-long break from acting for his role here, and he couldn't have picked a better part: he plays a commendable guy, extremely hard-bitten and intelligent and yet not without humour too – witness the very funny scenes involving a moose and a horse. Tom Berenger, in comparison, is taciturn and unfriendly and watching the two butt heads makes for a lot of fun.

As the villain of the piece, Clancy Brown gives a towering performance that builds on his breakout part as the Kurgan in HIGHLANDER. He's hulking and frightening, a vicious psychopath who leaves a trail of bodies in his wake and doesn't think twice about bumping off defenceless old women. It's truly an intimidating turn, delivered in classic Brown style, and adds to the film immeasurably. Kirstie Alley is thrown into the mix to equalise the gender balance a little and doesn't have a lot to work with, but to be fair the film isn't about her.

For a thriller, there are plenty of suspense scenes, some of them truly nail-biting – witness the set-piece involving the cable car. Okay, so the film does lose points slightly for moving away from the wilderness locations for the climax – it would have done a lot better by staying in the mountains – but such things are merely minor detractions and don't spoil the flow too much. This no-frills adventure/thriller hybrid is right on the money.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
First 40-45 minutes = spectacular
witster1831 March 2017
"Shoot to Kill" is a decent sleeper of a action/thriller from the '80s starring Tom Berenger and Sidney Poitier.

The film starts with an incredibly intense and very clever set-up. From there it quickly turns into more of a wilderness picture. In this middle segment there is some great scenery and action, but the film does start to have a few notable issues. The most glaring of which is how the film turns Berenger into a bit of a wilderness novice after they establish the character as the opposite. At least when this happened in "White Water Summer 7/10", it was a serious injury that justified the role-swap.

The third segment when they get back to civilization is the weakest - a bit far fetched and anti-climactic.

All that said, for the first 75 minutes this is an edge of your seat, thrilling adventure. Sidney is spectacular as usual. Berenger is decent, more sabotaged than a weakness, and Kirstie Alley is pretty good here.

I can recommend this as a fast-paced sleeper from the '80s that may have flown past your radar. Certainly worth a first look or a revisit. It's a very high 6 for me, borderline almost 7. On the other hand, if we could go back and apply some quick touch-up paint we'd have an 8.

Hope it helps.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The trek in the mountains
jotix10025 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
After a diamond dealer's home is attacked by a man who wants the precious stones, the robber takes the dealer's wife hostage in a violent confrontation with the police and FBI in San Francisco. The agent in charge, Warren Stantin, gives the diamonds to the, almost invisible, man, who flees by boat taking the loot with him. The only way to beat the FBI and the people that are following him is to head north to Canada.

Thus begins this action thriller that uses the Canadian Rockies as the backdrop for setting this story about a determined FBI enforcer following a deadly assassin who has left a trail of killings as he goes into the mountains. Stantin is told the only way to find his man is by engaging Jonathan Knox, a man who knows the area, to guide him. Knox, who is reluctant, at first, realizes the man might be part of a group his girlfriend, Sarah, is taking on an extended trek of the mountains.

Stantin and Knox begin to fight as they have different ideas about what to do, but they end up bonding, as they understand what is at stake. This pair endures some of the worst weather conditions in their quest for the assassin, and in finding the diamonds that the outlaw wants to sell to an unscrupulous man in Vancouver.

Roger Spottiswoode directed this action filled movie with sure hand. The screen play is by Harv Zimmel and Daniel Petrie, two men who know how to involve the viewer. Michael Chapman photographed the great outdoors with an eye on the dangerous aspects of the chase.

Sidney Poitier is seen as Warren Stantin, an FBI agent that is restless in his pursue of the killer. This was Mr. Poitier's return to the movies after quite a number of years not being in front of a camera. Tom Berenger plays Knox, an outdoors man who is more at home in the mountains than among people.

The surprise of the story is that we don't have a clue up to the middle of the film about who the real killer is. By positioning him among the group that Sarah is taking on a mountain expedition, adds a great deal of suspense to the story. The ending leaves a lot to be desired, but that's only a minor complaint about this action packed film.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hiking with - and running after - the Devil!
Coventry22 November 2023
"Deadly Pursuit" marked the (acting) comeback of the honorable Sidney Poitier after slightly more than a decade of absence, and he ALMOST couldn't had chosen a better film for it! The first half is a sublime, near-perfect, edge-of-the-seat thriller. It begins with an intense and ruthless home-jacking/armed robbery situation that doesn't end too well, and it infuriates the presiding FBI-agent Stantin (Poitier) so badly that he goes after the psychopath with a personal grudge. The chase leads to the remote Northwestern mountains and forests, as the psycho infiltrates into a guided group of fishers/hikers on his trail to Canada. Stantin and local tracker Knox (Berenger), whose girlfriend (Alley) is the unsuspecting guide, reluctantly team up to go after the group.

The greatest gimmick in Harv Zimmel's script is that, throughout the whole hostage opening, the face of the killer/jewel thief remains unseen, and his identity stays unknown when he sneaks into the fishing party. So, for a while, Kirsty Alley is alone in the woods with five potential psychopaths (and it literally could be any of them), which provides "Deadly Pursuit" with a uniquely uncanny atmosphere.

Alas, the revelation comes too quick (in my humble opinion) and after that "Deadly Pursuit" turns into a routine cat-and-mouse thriller full of clichés, macho-showdowns, with only stupendous locations and landscapes to admire.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A bit silly now and then, but still a quite suspenseful and fun action flick.
imseeg24 October 2019
Typical eighties action flick with some cheap and cheesy plot turns, but overall still quite enjoyable.

The story is about a chase for a serial killer on the run, who has kidnapped a guide in the mountains. Some good suspense. Some good jokes by Sidney Poitier and Tom Berenger, who both are in pursuit of the serial killer, but who cant stand the company of each other, resulting in many butch and cheeky dialogues and conflicts.

Dont expect credibility. Dont expect realistic shootouts. The action sequences are often quite cheesy, but overall this action flick has got a certain charm that is undeniably fun to watch.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Did you see the Moose...
FlashCallahan12 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A man is discovered breaking into his own jewellery shop in the dead of night.

Questioned closely, it's learned that his wife is being held hostage by an extortionist who demands the diamonds in the shop's safe.

The extortionist manages to escape FBI agent Warren Stantin, who subsequently chases him into the forests of Northern America.

Stantin recruits the help of a reluctant local Jonathon Knox, who has the skills necessary to track down the criminal.

The only problem is that Stantin has no experience in the wilderness...

From the amazing opening ten minutes, this film is a real oddity, a bona-fide classic movie that has long been forgotten, and is shown on BBC 1 every year at a silly hour.

It's so strange that this film was/has/is overlooked, because it has so many qualities to it.

One moment it's a tense, almost mystical psycho thriller, and then we are thrown into the middle of a party, with the director throwing in as many bad guys as possible from pass movies, to try and fool the audience.

And then after moments of sheer intense, we are treated to some very funny moments of comedy, The Moose scene, the scene with the ear, and Poitiers getting used to the elements.

All very funny, and all specific to the movie.

The two leads put in great performances and never let up the hokey chemistry they have, and while the film does lose a little edge in the final third, it has a great two acts to more than make up for it.

An excellent movie, and one I hope Hollywood doesn't re-boot.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Disappointing
grandpagbm3 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The idea behind this film was a good one. Too bad it wasn't written well. Casting Sidney Poitier as the FBI agent was a good idea, and he did an outstanding job. Tom Berenger, on the other hand, only knows one emotion in most of his movies, anger. Kirstie Alley's character could have been a great one, and even showed some possibilities once, but the writer really let us down by making her role mostly a helpless female. This was completely inconsistent with the strongly independent character she was supposed to be. I don't care for Alley's acting anyway. The movie should have ended about fifteen minutes sooner than it did. The director milked the cow dry before the unbelievable final action. I will keep this in my collection only as an example of Poitier's performances.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed