Tiger Warsaw (1988) Poster

(1988)

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
blockbuster this is not, arty character based story of the human spirit, this is
HelenMary29 January 2013
This was a surprising role for Patrick Swayze after the run away success of Dirty Dancing, but perhaps he wanted to secure himself as a character actor rather than simply a dancing, smouldering romantic lead. And this he does. Whilst this film doesn't garner much attention, it is nevertheless a piece of drama of high calibre. Overall, it is uplifting and a story of triumph and love, but it gets there via the medium of a rather dreary, grey film full of clever direction that takes advantage of the mill-town backwater working class experience and turns it into something stylised and arty. The scene cuts, if you watch them, the use of silence, the use of bells or the train whistle, Tiger's frustration and mounting anger set against the rolling stock of the train going past... it's actually rather beautiful. The stand out performances are most definitely Swayze and Barbara Williams (Kiki) and you can see her powerful stage presence clearly - I can imagine she was a wonderful Lady MacBeth. Piper Laurie I thought was too contrived, her face immobile (all the female characters except Kiki had FAR too much make up) but emotive and honest; you were very much sympathetic to her but much of the rest of the acting was mediocre with exception of Lee Richardson, the father, and there were some remarkably tender scenes between the two parents. The child actors - Kiki's children - were terrible. Swayze showed a range and depth demonstrating how good he was, especially with the backdrop of very little by way of excitement or colour; it really was him, the camera and little else except raw emotion a lot of the time. He carried the film. It was definitely an 80s film and it looks old and weary, brought to life by Swayze in his prime, and he looked amazing.

This film has at it's heart a family crisis and the longterm effects, guilt, regret, fear, heartache, self-loathing and misunderstanding that can poison a family, and a community, and how reconciliation can be achieved and the painful process it can be. It is clear what the crux of the crisis was, it is shown through increasingly revealing flashbacks and through dialogue, and with the spectre of drug and alcohol abuse it is plausible and relatable. I had not seen this film for a long time, and forgotten how lovely it is, but whilst I enjoy it, I am well aware that it's not a great film.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Only worth it for poor Swayze
DanTheMan2150AD26 January 2024
Paced akin to that of a funeral, Tiger Warsaw sees the loveable Patrick Swayze trapped in time as a 70s greaser coming home in a melodramatic tale of reconciliation. There is no other reason to seek this out outside of Swayze, who broods sentimentality throughout the movie with an unshakeable boyish charm, he's just been saddled with a truly terrible screenplay. Drifting drearily along until, with about 10 minutes to go, it ends in a rushed wrap, as though somebody suddenly realized that time was up. It's mainly just a series of encounters with no oomph or style while Amin Q. Chaudhri's direction leaves most of the film completely incomprehensible with poorly lit and uncomfortably long shots dominating the runtime. If I can give it any form of praise outside of its main star, some of the songs on the soundtrack do slap but, other than that, Tiger Warsaw is a fraught movie that lurches between trauma and tearjerker. Driving towards a predictable conclusion, carrying the dubious message that matrimonial bliss and domestic harmony is the ultimate aspiration.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not so bad
pirie-110 December 2003
A lot of people didn't enjoy this, but I did. It shows a real life situation that can & does happen in any Family. Hardly any sex, swearing, drug takihg & no violence. Give it a go & have a watch if you haven't seen it. Patrick has done a lot better but when he shows his sensitive side I think he is a much better actor.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
culturally incompatible
mrpoizun-16 January 2008
Director Chaudhri's foreign birth comes through loud and clear in this mess of a movie. Swayze's Tiger Warsaw has supposedly done something so terrible it has turned his entire family against him, but it's never made clear exactly what this horrible deed was. Peeping Tom, maybe? When he meets up with an old hometown buddy their reaction to each other can only be described as homosexual, but nothing further in that direction develops. There is also another odd and brief scene in a bar where he is accosted by another old classmate who is now a cross-dresser. I can only assume this kind of stuff has some meaning in India or Pakistan, but it makes no sense in an American movie. Which is obviously what the studio thought since they premiered it outside of the USA. The only good things about the movie are the cool motorcycle jacket Swayze wears throughout, and the bitchin' '68 black Road Runner he drives.
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Another Swayze Dud.
phillafella2 May 2003
After a successful role in the hit film DIRTY DANCING, Patrick Swayze was thought to be one of the biggest stars in Hollywood, but when he took the lead role in TIGER WARSAW, it proved disasterous. This predictable tale of a former addict who tries to patch things up with his family does little to entertain anyone. The movie fails to make sense at times and Swayze's hunk appeal isn't there. A bit better than the dreary ROAD HOUSE, but still far from successful.

1 out of 5.
6 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
JEER - (3 stars out of 10)
BJG-Reviews11 March 2021
The stage curtains open ...

The first time I saw the poster to this movie, I thought it was going to be another action-filled vehicle similar to "Road House", but it was nothing like that. When I read the synopsis to the film on the back, I realized it was the exact opposite - a family drama that hit on a few heavy topics. Regardless, I picked up a copy and watched it. I like a good drama as much as the next person.

It is the story of a prodigal son, outcast from his family after a harrowing event (of his doing) that emotionally scars them, and himself. Fifteen years later, after living a lost life, he returns home hoping to find reconciliation and forgiveness with his mother, sister, and most importantly, his father who hasn't been the same since. His sister has moved on with her life, getting ready to be married. All of his friends are married with kids, and his parents are living a quiet life, finding respite with each other. Finally, things come to a head and heavy decisions have to be made.

I can see how some have enjoyed this film. Overall, the acting is pretty good, though a bit over dramatic in some parts, and underwhelming in others. The consistency here is sorely lacking, and the movie ultimately comes off as completely disjointed and nonsensical. This is clearly one of Patrick Swayze's worst films, as even he didn't seem to be invested into his role. Everything was off kilter ... the plot and character development never happens. The level of believability is next to none. Even with some good actresses on board with Piper Laurie and Mary McDonnell, it all crumbles to the ground.

I can't justifiably recommend this movie, not even to a die hard Swayze fan. It was a disappointment on most levels. It actually had the feel of a made-for-tv movie, and not a very good one at that. This is a pass, and gets 3 stars out of 10 at best. There are some other, much better, Patrick Swayze films out there ... and that is where your focus should be.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
the only sin is forbidding someone to love you
SteveSkafte14 August 2011
It's hard to honestly express the virtues of a film that is generally regarded as sub-par without going too far in the other direction. It's not that "Tiger Warsaw" is a complete success, indeed, there are many things that just don't quite work. Patrick Swayze, though his top billing is certainly the only reason this film has reached its relatively small audience, never quite fills out his character believably. That, and the somewhat low key feeling of the overall production, serves to play against the very same things that most potential viewers are looking for.

But there are very many good points. This is an exceptionally beautiful film to look at. Robert Draper's cinematography is cold, aching, with a powerful understanding of light. These scenes feel like real life of the kind we all know, not some imitation or expression of style. The director, Amin Q. Chaudhri (who made the similarly quiet drama "An Unremarkable Life" the following year), pulls back from his actors in the best possible way, observing their simple actions rather than trying to be over-dramatic. The story is well-realized in execution, but not entirely well-written. Roy London has a certain understanding of dialogue and character that is evident, but his plotting leaves something to be desired. There are avenues taken that seem unlikely, and others left untouched that could have been effectively explored.

But this is a real film. There's no over-acting, no showing off. There's a lot of humanity, and some heartbreaking performances. Piper Laurie is incredibly human, fully alive in her role. She might be remembered for more extreme roles like in "Carrie", but it's films like "Rising Son" and this production that show her depth.

I recommend this for its visual beauty, and its quiet understanding.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Swayze does well!
rod-9920 February 2005
The interesting thing about Swayze is that he "did" this movie... more or less after Dirty Dancing. After the success of Dirty Dancing Swayze could've done anything - instead he decides to tell the simple and sad tale of one families personal tragic past.

A big career mistake? I don't think so, this is a fine movie and a fine vehicle for Swayze to explore his talent. In all fields this film has strength... the acting and cast are rock solid... the location work is fabulous and the story, although tame compared to todays standards still hits the target solidly. The only thing that shows through in parts is the budget is lacking. Swayze does well as the out casted son weaving his sentimental spell as the movie unfolds its mystery. The simple sense of futility and overwhelming sadness in this film is all due to Swayze acting his part so well.

Sure this is not a blockbuster - and on it's budget it wasn't supposed to be, but as entertainment value (which is what movies are all about) this is a fine piece of work. Watch it!
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sappy and Unlikely
Fletch-88 September 1998
I am biased towards this title -- I live in the town it was filmed in. In fact, my street was actually shown in it but, that aside, this movie is very weird. It is unlikely that the events that take place in it would ever happen. The people are just, basically going through the motions. The acting is not that great considering the fine actors that appear in it (i.e. Patrick Swayze, Piper Laurie, Mary McDonnell, Barbara Williams.) I suggest this film for it's location. Sharon, Pennsylvania is a typical steel town and the director, Amin Chaudri captured the rustic images quite well. In fact, many of the location shots seem to be done just to showcase the area. See this movie if you have nothing better to do.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Avoid if into Horror,fighting genres etc - WATCH - if you have a sensitive side, and want to enjoy a refreshing story/film, with a brilliant performance by Swayze...
DjLee-Manchester25 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I kept seeing this film in my local video shop and was never sure what to make of it. So, i never bothered until the other day (Feb 2005) I went down to my local video shop 'Global Videos' (A National video shop-UK)and found myself a copy on DVD (They only had 4 copies left) I like Patrick Swayze - and feel hes under-rated as an actor. I bought the DVD mainly out of curiosity and the fact it was only £3 (Pounds sterling) (Just under 6 American Dollars i think!) ANYWAY!THE FILM! Patrick Swayze (who appears to of done 1-2 films, every year (til 1997 when he took some time out) straight from doing the Hit film 'Dirty Dancing' and a classic for me - 'Steel Dawn' in 1987 comes his first film of '88 'Tiger Warsaw' Some say this was a complete change of the typical role Swayze normally portrays-but i have to disagree. Just like the two films mentioned above-Swayze takes on a character that appears to be hard on the outside - but sensitive, and caring on the inside. (Johnny in Dirty D was this cool,rough around the edges dancer-until Baby reveals the 'real' Johnny - same with 'Steel Dawn' Nomad was a warrior a soldier, hardened by the war. Lost everything he cared about and loved - a fighter. Until he makes it his mission to play peace keeper and protect the farm)

In 'Tiger' the hardened, 'bad boy' side to swayze's character happens mainly 15 years prior to the present day in the film. 'Chuck 'Tiger' Warsaw' was a 'bad boy' (a bad seed as he is called in the film) and everybody knows it. He was into drink and drugs - and stealing. Without revealing the plot too much- 'Tiger' does something bad involving his own family and leaves town. During the first few years he dives into drugs and booze even worse than before until finally he goes into Rehab. During the 15 years since he left town, his family have tried hard to forget him and get on with their lives. Even tried to convince themselves 'Tiger' was dead. Fresh out of re-hab-'Tiger' returns to the town he ran away from 15 years ago. In the vein attempt to get his life back and sort it out with not only his friends but his family. Drug free - and t-total. However 15 years is a long time. Can he ever be forgiven for what he did before skipping town? After all- everyone he loved would rather him be dead. This film is outdated- i admit. But the emotions are still there. Even 17 years on - there will still be people that can still relate to this film. It might not have quite the same impact as it could of back then (as we live in a hardened world) But this doesn't stop us from feeling for the characters (Especially 'Tiger') who long for love,forgiveness and to take everything back to before the events of 15 years ago. Swayze does really well in the portrayal of 'Tiger', and proves to us how deep his acting skills really are. This film wont win any 'Best film of the century awards' but if you enjoy all FILMS (not just pacific genres eg.Horror,fighting,action etc.) you will appreciate this. Its refreshing, NOT a chick flick, just a film about real events that happen in the real world-emotions, family,love,pain,anger even lads with a sensitive side can enjoy this film.

NOT for the action/horror etc lover - but for those with a sensitive side, and enjoy a refreshing true-to-life story. It can tug at your heart strings if you let it - especially if you've experienced similar things in your own life. (Family break-ups etc)

AVOID if you don't understand the appeal of sensitive storys and films. GIVE IT A GO- If you want a refreshing story/film in comparison to modern films, and if you enjoy sincere performances by Patrick Swayze.

Its cheap enough to get a copy on DVD -why don't you give it a try. Make your own mind-just as i did. I personally enjoyed it-and feel an updated-modern approach/remake to the same story- would do well. (Keep Patrick in it though!)

7/10
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very Heart Warming
rubears19 April 2004
I have recently been watching Patrick Swayze's DVD's and Videos. I am very much into his acting. I think Tiger is really a very touching story about a son who created a lot of trouble for his family, he got rehabilitated and wanted to go back home and make up for his trouble he had caused. I cry when I watch this story. I think this has happened in a lot of families in the United States. I think Patrick Swayze is very good. Of course, I think he is good in everything I have seen him act in. In my estimation this is a very tear jerker. I would watch this anyday, and cry when I watch it. There very little violence in it and I give it a top rating. Of course, Patrick Swayze is number one in my book for everything so far I have seen.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Forgiveness and atonement begins in one's self.
mark.waltz16 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Nearly two decades before, the troubled Chuckie "Tiger" Warsaw (Patrick Swayze) left his hometown of Sharon PA after a near family tragedy left his father (Lee Richardson) a shell of himself. Out of the blue he returns just as his sister (Mary McDonnell) is about to get married (big coinkidink), upsetting everybody but dad whom mom (Piper Laurie) won't tell. Of course dad's going to find out at some point, but it's going to take some healing with his mother and very embittered sister before they will truly forgive even though he's desperate to atone.

Of course mom is instantly willing to allow him back into her heart, but the pain is too deep inside everybody else. Other secrets are unraveled, further opening the wounds. Outside of mom, an old girlfriend with a slew of children (Barbara Williams) and his pal (Bobby DiCicco) seem to be the only ones on his side. Kay Ballard is a delightful surprise as an overly chatty relative with a penchant for bringing up old family gossip.

This is a dark family drama, set in the northeast as opposed to the south or midwest where all those Edward Albee, Tennessee Williams, Clifford Odets, Horton Foote and August Wilson plays are usually set, just off of I-79 between Erie and Pittsburgh, and as an Erie native, it was easy to see that this was a realistic presentation of life in this blue collar industrial area, quite beautiful but filled with economic hardships. Swayze goes for something less mainstream, creating a very interesting anti-hero who longs to fix old damage that perhaps no bandage or saline solution can cure.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Actually an above average viewing, it has lots of heart, and was fully watchable I rather liked it! *Spoilers*
callanvass23 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Tiger Warsaw is actually a pretty decent film, it's got lots of heart, and a great cast which includes a fine performance from Patrick Swayze for the most part. In many ways Patrick is the heart and soul of this film and he carries it pretty well, and the ending is nice and heartwarming, however the low budget, and some scenes felt overly corny for my tastes(especially that god awful music!). At times Patrick's character is overly selfish but for the most part I felt for him, and the scene where Chuck(Swayze) reunites with his father is touching and heartfelt,however it did have it's dull scenes here and there not many though. It's a tear jerker alright, and very harshly treated by all the critics, and it's too bad Swayze never became the box office superstar everyone predicted cause he was a solid actor, plus I feel it's one of his most underrated movies. Overall this is a solid little flick, and I recommend it give it a chance you may like it. *** out of 5

The Acting is pretty good. Patrick Swayze is excellent for the most part, there were a couple times he over did it, but for the most part it's a heartfelt performance, and at times an emotional one, this guy Doesen't get enough credit he carried this as far as i'm concerned. Piper Laurie is great as the mom, she was very convincing, if only she had more screen time. Lee Richardson is awesome as the dad,he was quite intense and those scenes he had with Swayze were so touching. Mary McDonnell is OK as Paula but annoyed the crap out of me as I thought she was so selfish. Barbara Williams is good as Swayze's girlfriend she did a solid job and had good chemistry with Swayze. Bobby Di Cicco is good as Tony I liked him.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great emotional film worth seeing!!
psmithyyyyy26 December 2015
I am surprised how harsh these people on IMDb are towards this great film. Just shows you how critical people can be and perhaps even a bit cynical. I was moved by this film, from the sad theme that plays in the beginning, to swayze's performance which I must agree carries the film. I was very well acted, and the emotions all the characters feel are real. even the annoying unforgiving sister, some part of me thinks that well, I can understand why she feels the way she does towards tiger. He did a lot of bad things. I was very sad for him, the scene when he meets his mom for the first time in years was so moving, I almost teared up. You just really see that he wants to change his life, one small step at a time, even getting a job as a checkout clerk at the local store, as lowly as it is he wants to change his life and you cant help but realize how true to life this really is. it touches home in many ways. the only one who understands him are his friend and old flame, who was beautiful and relatable. She like tiger is remembered for having a rather sordid reputation, she used to sleep around with the jocks and was the town whore I suppose. But both of them need those second chances, I felt bad when he decided to leave her and the kids, and that he almost commits suicide....it was just such a sad sad story but a beautiful one, and anyone who cant enjoy this, who cant see how hurt families can be and I suppose I can understand this story myself. If your a cynic or a critic, or both, don't watch this. If your an actual human with a heart and love smaller scale character drama's about family forgiveness and redemption, watch this. You wont be disappointed.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Harshly reviewed but the film has some heart
Robert_duder7 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I've come to think that perhaps I am becoming too soft on films. Every review I do seems to be a 6 + and I usually can find something redeemable about it. Tiger Warsaw was no different. I love Patrick Swayze, I think he's a huge screen presence and following the phenomenal success of Dirty Dancing he took the lead in this low budget drama and I think gives one of his best dramatic roles. The story is a little dreary, and slow moving and it is certainly fairly typical but still Swayze is very watchable and the final half hour of the film is actually moving and heart felt.

Swayze plays the lead in Chuck "Tiger" Warsaw. A former wild child/drug addict who lost everything one fateful night when he was caught by his father stealing from them to feed his habit. Fast forward 15 years when Tiger returns to his hometown in hopes of making things right. In some ways it's a story about a man who finally grew up and needs to have closure for the horrible and foolish things he did as a teenager. Swayze plays the perfect anti-hero. He did some horrible things and he's feeling sorry for himself and at times you hate him, and at other times you can't help but pity him and his situation and that is exactly what the role aims for. I think he does an incredible job especially in a sub standard written and directed film. He is the most talent in the film case closed. Three time Oscar Nominee Piper Laurie plays Chuck Warsaw's mother Frances. Torn between the love of her son and the deep love and respect for her husband she fights to bring her family together. She is good but her role is unfortunately small. Given a bigger role her and Swayze could have stormed this film and made it powerful. Lee Richardson plays a terrific role as Chuck Warsaw's father. Slightly handicapped in ways that is never fully explained by the gun shot wound he suffered at the hands of his son, Michael Warsaw has all but erased the memory of his son from his mind. When he finally discovers Tiger is back in town everything comes flooding back to him so quickly the last thing he feels is forgiveness. The eventual meeting of father and son following 15 years apart is almost disastrous and intense. Mary McDonnell as the Warsaw sister, Paula who in some ways is a focus of the film didn't come across well. In fact I found her rather annoying and dull. Unfortunate because the role should have been better. Barbara Williams is Swayze's love interest, his former high school flame newly rekindled Karen. Her role should have been more significant as well because in many ways her life and character are the same as Tiger's. She's out-casted, misunderstood and stereotyped by everyone in the town. Her and Tiger have a passionate affair but you know what?? It doesn't feel all that passionate...it's a little rigid and rushed and you never feel any major chemistry that should have been there.

Amin Q. Chaudhri is mostly lacking experience, and in this case a budget. I think the budget was probably next to nothing and the story is vapid and far too rushed. Roy London who wrote the film had some ideas but they were smashed together without any meat in the middle. Even something typical can be powerful and moving with the right script and dialog and unfortunately Tiger doesn't have it. BUT with the terrific screen presence of some of the cast like Swayze, and Lee Richardson. Swayze single handedly at least carries the film and makes it watchable. For the most part you can steer clear of it but if you really like Swayze or want something rare and off the beaten path you won't hit it. It has some heart. 7/10
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed