Faust - Vom Himmel durch die Welt zur Hölle (1988) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Worth a look.
slide_0126 April 2005
The review by PlanecrazyIkarus hits the nail on the head - a good adaptation that loses effectiveness as it (over)reaches.

Good acting, but a little too over-the-top at times. Faithful to the text, but decidedly modern. Various forms of high-contrast lighting on plain sets (and a few technical gimmicks) provide a stark, stylish vision that holds initial attention but fast becomes tedious.

Sure to inspire good after-screening conversation, worthy of a few bonus points for its weirdness!

Final Grade: 6/10.

Worth a look.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A production that delights in the grotesque
flittermouse6 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This production is grotesque: aside from the aforementioned Mephistopheles who flashes the audience (while still wearing bib and gloves)a looming Virgin Mary dominates several scenes, the colours of the sets and lighting design clash and most of the minor characters are decked out in corpse paint. I mean, it's pretty ugly. Deliberately ugly, for the most part. Helmut Griem presents a Faust who has very little way to fall even before Mephistopheles turns up, and Mephistopheles himself is played engagingly by Romuald Pekny as a shape-shifting, deceptive devil who adopts various disguises throughout the play but fails to disguise his primal beastliness. As other reviewers have mentioned, it's a comprehensive adaptation of the play, missing only a scene or two and as such comes in at 169 minutes. The grotesque styling, the colours and lights do become wearing, and despite the more explicit treatment of 'Walpurgis Nacht', it's still not particularly interesting to watch (a fault more Goethe's than Dorn's, to be fair). Unlike the 1960 production, in which the supporting cast were wholly overshadowed by Gustaf Gründgens' Mephistopheles, this production makes everyone bar Gretchen a devil, and consequently both lacks any real tension between Faust and Mephistopheles and becomes visually overwhelming, ending up more carnival than narrative.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not suitable for minors?
PlanecrazyIkarus26 April 2002
Well, first let me say that I don't really like Faust (the play), so I'm not going to comment on the merits of the plot and dialogue. They stick to the book. (In case you don't know, the story is about an old scholar who makes a pact with the devil after realizing that he wasted his youth without achieving any enlightenment, and then he is turned into a young man again, falls in love etc. Needless to say there is a tragic outcome)

This adaptation includes even those scenes that Goethe cut out, because they were too tasteless. I'm talking about the full Walpurgisnacht witch festival on the Blocksberg, including multiple dialogue references to sex, even with children. Also, it is rather free in the adaptation of one other scene, where Mephistopheles has a monologue while masturbating. I remember the words from the play, but the fact that he was masturbating (including a brief display of his devillified penis with extra fur attached to make it look more wicked) must have skipped my mind while reading the play.

Apart from being rather mature in its contents, it is a good adaptation, sticking to the text and having good acting. The Faust/Gretchen Marte/Mephisto scene in the garden was quite well done.

A bit tasteless, but complete, and useful if you need to know Faust for school. It fulfills that purpose - otherwise, it is rather too rude in my opinion.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed