Heroes Stand Alone (1989) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Heroes Stand Alone is forgettable
tarbosh220009 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Everyone seems pretty happy that all the violence that has plagued the Central American country of San Pedro has finally ceased. Whatever war that they were formally involved in has officially ended. Tensions arise when a mysterious plane crashes in San Pedro. Zack Duncan (Everett) leads a team of commandos in a search for the plane's black box.

Whatever was recorded on the box must be awfully important, because a joint team of evil Russkies and Cubans are also after the box. Then, as you might imagine, shootings and blow-ups ensue. But when Walt Simmons (Dillman) eventually spills the beans on what's really going on, Zack has to search his soul to find out the true meaning of "shootings and blow-ups". Who will be on the receiving end of this Zack Attack? Well, as you may have heard, HEROES STAND ALONE.

Yet another in a seemingly-endless stream of jungle slogs, Heroes Stand Alone fails to distinguish itself from its vast array of competitors. While Rick Dean and Bradford Dillman are the strong points in an otherwise completely mediocre and average affair, even their combined talents can't really turn 'Heroes into something that rises above the fray.

In the great video store year of 1989, we as consumers were really spoiled for choice. So Roger Corman must have figured he could pump out some more of the same-old-same-old and at least it would be an option for video store patrons who were perusing the shelves. Heroes Stand Alone is all but forgotten today, however.

Maybe David Carradine was unavailable, as he was probably elsewhere in the jungle making his own slogs, so they filled his shoes with Chad Everett. Helpfully, the back of the VHS box informs us that Everett is, and we quote, a "popular film and television actor". I guess back in the days before Imdb, you had to say something like that so people wouldn't think they'd be wasting their time watching a movie with an unpopular film and television actor.

In any case, Everett sports a rather unflattering Moe Howard hairstyle and doesn't have a ton of charisma, which is needed if you're starring in an action film. Rick Dean has a lot more going on than Everett does.

As is the case in way too many movies of this sort, it needed a better villain and more baddies for our heroes to shoot. It also needed more Bradford Dillman. His speech at the end was great and we needed more scenes like that. Also we could have used more scenes such as the one where a real-life Mario gets shot. This guy resembles Mario way more than Bob Hoskins ever did. Yet another wasted opportunity.

While there is an exploding helicopter, and most of the military jargon revolves around SAMs, it's all very standard, unexciting fare. When the Corman factory was deciding who they should get to direct this particular jungle outing, they naturally picked Mark Griffiths, whose previous two films were Hardbodies (1984) and Hardbodies 2 (1986). He brings a bit of that juvenile humor to the film, but he doesn't seem to understand action all that well.

In the end, Heroes Stand Alone is forgettable and the peacenik ending is about as lame as it gets. We'd love to love the film, as some of the ingredients are there, but, sadly, it seems like it's going to be standing alone on the dusty old shelves of the past.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Well...they deserve to be alone if they're gonna make junk like this.
BrettErikJohnson1 February 2004
Within the first five minutes, I was laughing so hard that my eyes were filling with tears. Of course, the problem is that "Heroes Stand Alone" isn't meant to be a comedy.

An American spy plane crashes in the jungles of San Pedro, a fictional Central American country. The US government sends in a team to retrieve the black box. Meanwhile, some Russian and Cuban guerillas are attempting to reach the crash site first. Can't you just feel the tension?!!

The sole special effect which the makers of this film could afford was pyrotechnics. That would be fine if there were such things as a plot or actual actors. Alas, those are nowhere to be found so the attempt is made to distract you with the occasional fireball. A plane crash? We see a series of fire spouts shooting up from the ground. A shoulder-launched missile? We're entertained with a few sparks and a puff of smoke which doesn't even cause minor injury to anyone within five feet of it. A dead body? Yup...they set it on fire!

Anything executive produced by Roger Corman usually has perilously low standards. This is no different. Anyone who couldn't make the cut to even be in the background of a McDonald's commercial has been signed up to have speaking roles in this little flick. They all spend too much time talking about nothing and a person can only take so much shooting blanks or blowing things up. The only thing heroic about this movie is you if you can sit through it all. 1/10
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Poor war movie
lor_3 May 2023
My review was written in November 1989 after a screening at Criterion theater on Times Square.

"Heroes Stand Alone" is a subpar war film notable only for its attractive Peruvian locations.

Chad Everett, who toplooined in a more thoughtful WW II war pic for WB back in 1966 ("First to Fight"), stars as CIA mercenary Zack Duncan, serving in Central America in the guerrilla war of fictional country San Pedro. Film's shooting title was "Duncan's Dodgers", but it's a far cryh from such action forebears as "Merrill's Marauders" and "Dayton's Devils".

Ridiculous screenplay concerns an abortiive U. S.-backed flyover mission that violates a San Pedro ceasefire. When the plane is shot down, Everett and his men are sent to recover survivors and the incriminating flight recorder black box before Cuban and Russian troops find them and create an international incident.

Bradford Dilllman is the bad guy, an ex-CIA operative who's now a dirty, doublecrossing arms dealer. As a sign of the times, pic makes the Russian adviser a good guy ane even humanizes the set of stereotyped Cubans; "the company" (CIA) and is alumni are naturally the easy targets for scorn. A pretty Indian girl (Elsa Olivero) is artificially put on he Cuban team as a tracke, mainly to set up a topless bath at a Peruvian waterfall.

Mark Griffiths directs limply, with poorly staged battle scenes. Hokey finale of Everett and the Russkie thowing away their weapons (more a case of detente than glasnost) is laughably bad.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed