Roger & Me (1989) Poster

(1989)

User Reviews

Review this title
143 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
not journalistic but finds a greater truth
SnoopyStyle7 September 2015
Michael Moore recounts his prosperous working middle class life as a child in GM company town of Flint, Michigan. Everybody worked for GM except for Michael. He leaves his small paper he created to go to San Francisco. It doesn't go well and he returns to Flint. In 1985, GM CEO Roger Smith closes factories in Flint. Michael goes on a quest to get an interview with Roger Smith.

The criticism has centered on Michael Moore's manipulation of events in the movie. It's a valid argument if this is being measured against traditional documentaries. As a journalistic documentary, this has many flaws and possibly fatal flaws. As a reality-TV persuasion, this is a real ground breaker. While not every line is correct, the overall sentiment hits on a greater truth. Michael may portray himself as the underdog but he's a real giant.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Fall of Flint
view_and_review31 August 2020
Before Flint, Michigan had their recent water crisis, they had a jobs crisis. In the late 80's GM shuttered 11 plants and laid off 30,000 workers. "Roger & Me" is Michael Moore's dogged attempt to get GM chairman, Roger Smith, to go to Flint and see the devastating effects of the plant closures.

"Roger & Me" is a really depressing documentary. Flint went from a humming middle class community to a derelict wasteland with high crime and high unemployment. I'd like to say that "Roger & Me" had a happy ending, but if you know anything about Flint today, then you already know the answer to that.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Moore's best and most honest work
tomgillespie200231 August 2015
Over a decade before he was annoying the likes of Charlton Heston and George W. Bush, documentary film-maker Michael Moore was out of work and witnessing first-hand the devastating effects the closure of several General Motors plants had on his home town of Flint, Michigan. Roger & Me, his first feature film, documents Moore's attempts to get an interview with Roger Smith, the CEO of General Motors whose decision it was to move several plants - after recording record profits - to countries such as Mexico, where labour is cheaper, laying off thousand of Michigan workers in the process.

Moore's frequently rebuffed attempts to talk to the elusive figure provides much of the film's humour, with Moore's sardonic wit helping make light of what is a serious issue. With no film-making credentials so early in his career and with a membership card to Chunky Cheese his equivalent of a business card, he must rely of guerilla tactics to try and snatch a word with the man. He is kicked out of private clubs and a building where the fourteenth floor is strictly out-of-bounds, and the film is so low-budget that it's a wonder the boom mic doesn't creep into every other shot. But Moore has managed to craft a thought-provoking film despite the budget restrictions, holding a mirror up to Reagan-era America when corporations could simply pack up and move, leaving an entire town crumbling in its trail.

When Moore isn't on the hunt for Mr. Smith, he's interviewing residents hit hard by sudden unemployment, following Sheriff's Deputy Fred Ross as he evicts one family after another, and showing the various, often laughable, attempts by Flint to reinvigorate their economy through tourism. Moore has been criticised for playing with timelines and editing in his favour, manipulating the truth to back up his own liberal agenda. While I can certainly agree that this can be a dangerous approach (especially with his later film, Bowling for Columbine (2002)), the documentary medium is rarely as neutral as it lets on and a director always has a right to artistic license . Unlike his later films, Moore thankfully stays out of the picture for the bulk of the film and this allows Roger & Me to tell a more devastating story. Bowling for Columbine and Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) may have broken box-office records, but Roger & Me is Moore's best, and most honest, work.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Funny, smart, and too close to home.
grendelkhan24 July 2004
I grew up near Decatur, Il, a city that was devastated in the late 70's and 80's by downsizing in the auto industry, the migration of jobs south of the border, and corruption in the giants of agribusiness. The city's economy has never really recovered and has been on the frontlines of the labor battles of this country, while the national media has ignored it. It bears a close parallel to Flint, Michigan, as depicted in "Roger & Me.

Moore goes back to his hometown and sees the effects of massive job loss, created by a company that cared more about executive stock options and bonuses, than the community it lived in. We meet people who have lost their jobs, benefits, and homes as a result of short-sighted decisions. With few alternatives that pay a living wage, the community spirals into decline. We see the arrogance of wealth, via lavish parties, while the poor are evicted from their homes. We watch as city leaders concoct one bizarre cosmetic scheme after another, without ever addressing the real roots of the economic problems of the city.

The film makes many valid points which still hold true and still occur. You can find fault with Moore's "ambush" approach and mockery of celebrities; but, Moore has usually made civil efforts to talk with these individuals, only to be ignored or driven off. So, he resorts to grandstanding tactics which brings attention to the issues he is pursuing. Also, the celebrities are so generally caught up in their own self importance, that they deserve the skewering they receive.

You can fault Moore's tactics and selective portrayal of an issue, but he does provoke discussion, which is usually his aim. In this, he is following the great tradition of the muckrakers, like Upton Sinclair, who were able to stimulate argument on vital topics and effect positive change. Moore is a great filmmaker and thought-provoking figure. Love him or hate him, he makes you focus on issues. Too bad politicians and executives don't.
30 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Ahead of its time
safenoe22 February 2022
There are documentaries and there are documentaries, and this is the one that pretty much took the National Geographic-David Attenbourough documentary by the scruff of the neck to redefine the documentary as more than a neutral mouthpiece.

Michael Moore makes his point and then some. You may not agree with everything he posits, but really, this documentary makes you think about the impact of corporate greed on the 99.9% of society, and why is it so.

Why is it so Michael asks, why is it so.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Corporate America Attacked ( and deservedly so )
Mike-76410 January 2001
Roger & Me tells the story of Flint, Michigan after General Motors chairman Roger Smith, shut down the GM plant leaving the entire town in financial ruin. It also tells the story of director Michael Moore's quest to find Smith and bring him to Flint to see the town's devastation. The documentary tells the idiocy, cowardice, heartlessness, and kissing up of the rich while a town tries anything, and I do mean anything, to get back on their feet. I saw this in my high school economics class and after watching parts of Moore's TV Nation ( also highly recommended ) I felt compelled to watch this again. Contains grisly scenes of a rabbit being slaughtered, which I find painful since I have a pet rabbit, and Smith delivering a Christmas speech about the warmth the holiday season provides, while superimposed over a family being evicted on Christmas Eve. Smith later resigned as chairman and will later on meet a man in a red suit, and he ain't Santa Claus. 9 out of 10.
51 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting, yet typically flawed, Michael Moore documentary
Red-Barracuda26 March 2015
Roger & Me is Michael Moore's first documentary feature film. It's more personal than his other films in that it focuses on his hometown of Flint, Michigan. More specifically on the aftermath of the closure of the General Motors plant that was based there, which resulted in the loss of 30,000 jobs and subsequently led to a steep decline of Flint itself. The town developed such a poverty and crime problem that it was named as 'the worst place to live in America'.

It's a blackly comic work which constantly contrasts the people afflicted by the upheaval with the attitude of the town's elite. It also takes a dim view of GM itself and its chairman Roger Smith in particular. The narrative thrust of the film sees Moore pursue Smith to try and get a face-to-face interview. Needless to say, he is successful in this endeavour in only an extremely limited way, only getting a very brief exchange late on in proceedings. Moore's approach to this and the film in general is typically manipulative though, setting up situations where he knows he will be rebuffed and including some unfair interview snippets with some quite innocent people, making them look stupid with editing for cheap laughs. When I viewed Moore's work for the first time, this sort of stuff didn't very much concern me but now I find it a little too underhand for my liking.

Having said all this, if you accept that documentaries tend to be biased to some degree, I have to acknowledge that Moore does at the very least shine a light on a situation which otherwise would have been long forgotten by the majority of people by now and does give some disenfranchised folks a platform of sorts. And he is a skilled film-maker so his documentaries certainly are dynamic and entertaining which does help in getting a point across more effectively than a more sober treatment would. Roger & Me may be an attack on corporate America but it's often the smaller, stranger details that remain with you, such as the segment about the slightly unhinged lady who breeds and kills rabbits in her back yard in order to survive. On the whole, this film has all of the same negatives that all of Moore's subsequent work has, yet like those too it hammers home its point in an entertaining enough manner to remain in the memory and it occasionally hits upon an interesting truth every so often.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great film, despite some of Moore's liberties
Agent109 May 2002
Easily the funniest documentary of all time, this film takes a hard look at the common working man. So many elements in this film are excellent, and one gets to see the tough life these factory workers experience. From the cross action between Roger Smith and the workers getting evicted is one of the most surreal moments in a film full of them. While Michael Moore fiddled with the timeline egregiously, the tongue-in-cheek attitude most of the people exhibit is shocking. A movie for anyone who feels frustrated with the daily rat race.
35 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the Worst CEOs of All Time
Uriah4327 September 2015
This documentary focuses on a decision made by the CEO of General Motors, Roger B. Smith, to close several factories in Flint, Michigan and essentially lay off 30,000 workers who lived there. This decision had a catastrophic consequence for the city and to all of the people who lived there. But what I believe is even more important is that this documentary shows something that most people who embrace "free-market capitalism" don't fully appreciate and that is the difference between "stockholders" and "stakeholders". One would think a responsible corporate executive would realize that these two groups don't have to be mutually exclusive. Yet, even though this one decision was certainly bad for Flint, Michigan another aspect that people also don't see-and one that was not addressed in this video-is that this particular decision was one of many mistakes made by Roger B. Smith which eventually earned him the distinction of being named one of the "Worst American CEOs of all time" by CNBC. But I suppose in the minds of certain people since he and his buddies made millions everything is okay. Such is the mindset of the ignorant. At any rate, this was a good film and I have rated it accordingly. Above average.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A great documentarian is born
ToldYaSo2 May 1999
I saw this film at a second-run theatre not long after its initial release. And not being a fan of documentaries, I must say I was incredibly impressed, informed and even. (gasp!).entertained. Prior to this film, when I heard the word documentary, I usually conjured up images from Mutual of Omaha African landscapes and another scene of animals either mating or killing.

My mother has always touted the merits of stories based on true events, and of course documentaries being 100% true, she finally found a film that she could whole-heartedly embrace and recommend to her son who at the time, preferred films of a more fantastic and less plausible nature.

Michael Moore, the "Me" in "Roger And Me" has a dry wit that can leave you rolling in the aisles with his dumbfounded disbelief in the face of human absurdity that he encounters almost everywhere he goes on his hunt for "Roger" Smith, the CEO of General Motors. Michael just wants to talk with Roger and ask him to visit Flint, Michigan, Michael's hometown, to see the effect that closing down all the automotive plants in Flint has had on the people who live there. That effect being at times incredibly depressing and at others, quite amusing. The most amusing moments coming from Roger Smith's repeated, successful but narrow evasion from the confrontational Michael Moore.

Is Michael Moore entirely unbiased? Hell, no. But he is intelligent, engaging and inherently humourous in his views and I'm glad there's someone like him out there. If after this film, you feel you need more, than all you must do is prime yourself with his book, "Downsize This" and follow it up with the simple yet powerful documentary, "The Big One". Michael Moore is also the man behind the short lived "TV Nation" which ran for two years on two different networks in the early 90s, and proved to be some of the most intelligent, thought-provoking material that ever hit the idiot box. There are tapes available of the show, which I own, and sadly cannot recommend due to the low technical recording quality, which doesn't do the fantastic content justice.
22 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a good movie with strong points, but not sure how much to believe
hms4-11 February 2005
I like the movie, and I found it to be very interesting. I did not like so much how Moore felt he had to make the documentary more humorous by making fun of the people he was defending. However, I felt Moore did a good job of showing the devastating effects of General Motors leaving the small town of Flint, Michigan. Although you can't be too certain on how accurate some points in the movie are, the general idea that the town suffered because Roger Smith invested in factories in Mexico with cheap labor was expressed. This documentary laid some valid points down to what was beginning to happen in America with jobs being outsourced. The effects on this small town are so severe, and as this all happened about 15 years ago, it seems much more of America is experiencing their problems. This documentary touched on outsourcing and its effects, which today is still becoming a problem. Overall, it makes a strong impression and is an important movie to watch.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Moore's most personal film
CubsandCulture13 May 2021
This is the film that launch Moore's career. It has all his hallmarks; provocative juxtaposition, progressive politics, unfair muckrucking and some utterly striking scenes and people. I have only seen the film twice but the bunny lady-especially the interview where she is skinning the rabbit-has stayed with me, nearly word for word. But the main thing that comes through his Moore's love and pride in Flint.

The film's point of view is entirely with the people of Flint. And to Moore's credit he does not look down on any common person just trying to make it. The film's central argument is not as well-developed as it is in other Moore films but this is one of the more emotional and emotive films that Moore has made. He keeps his blistering sarcasm aimed squarely at GM; while he sympathy for the residents of Flint come through in every frame.

I watched this for the second time in 2021 and I think the economic disparity the film displays is the best possible meaning of "economic anxiety" that is allegedly driving trumpism.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Some people just don't like to celebrate human tragedy while on vacation
fidomax4 December 2006
Flint is small town that was for many years a extension to General Motors factory. One morning boss of Genergal Motor – Roger Smith woke up and discover the fact that closing the factory and fire of 30,000 people can make better business than carry on with production, despite the fact that factory didn't bring any losses.

"Roger and Me" is document where Michael Moore report the slow but systematic fall of his hometown because of Roger Smith decision. Moore just want one thing – bring Roger Smith to the town, so he can see with his own eyes the fallout. I wont spoiler, let me just say the one of last scene of this movie is very eerie and surreal.

This is very interesting document, when every reported thing is scary, curious and funny. My favorite moment is interview with women breeding rabbits (for pets, and for meat), but all of this encounters with Flint's peasants are at least informative. Yeah, it's a manipulation by Moore like always (I hate his Fahrenheit because of that), but here he selected and arranged the moment in very powerful way. The situation is real, and the horror of it its more then real, when we see this hopeless, not very bright people who where just because of one man decision put on the highway to hell.

And of course this movie is all about Moore. He is everywhere, non stop commenting, but the god-crusader from last scene of "Bowling for columbine" (Heston) is no where near here, and that's a good thing. This movie is just a well aimed shot, a punk-rock scream for a social injustice. This is art for document with power to stir up emotion and show people ugly things just the way they are: evictions, parades, idiotic city decision – ignorance, foolishness, powerlessness – its all powerful evil, and the last scene with very sad Christmas Carol its surreal.
14 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Mendacity
brule31x636 June 2004
Leni Riefenstahl would be embarrassed by the disgusting propaganda Moore tries to call "humor". That this movie, and Moore's other prevarications, actually attract admirers proves that, alas, it's possible to fool some of the people all of the time.

Let's see if we can bait foreigners. Let's see if we can extol obsolete factories. Let's see if we can add to the sum of hatred in the world. Let's see if we can pretend we're funny. Let's see if we can out-isolationist Charles Lindbergh. The only thing Moore lacks in comparison to Lindbergh is a medal from Göring.

Admittedly, in this film, Moore had a bit of self-deprecation to his schtick. In this film, Moore mocks Roger Smith, CEO of General Motors, as an aloof, uncaring elitist. Moore could do that in 1989, but now that Moore has surrendered himself to aloof, uncaring elitism, this characterization of Roger Smith has an ironic twinge. Who really wouldn't rather be Roger's buddy than Michael Moore's?
20 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
American Blue collar worker.
pk-213 May 2008
The best documentary i have viewed. This is a powerful indictment of American Corporate greed and the results to the blue collar worker. Who pay the price by loosing there job with the only trade they knew how to do since joining the workforce. Yes, like the one user mentioned, Govt. has something to do with the way companies function with there laws, tax's, and tariffs. But you can't tell me that these rich companies with allot of political power in Govt. Can't just stand up and say, No. Your hurting our company with these laws. But why would they care. All Ceo's and upper management have there golden parachutes. You can say what you want about all of Moore's movies, but if they were really so full of crap like so many believe, Where are all the lawsuits. There's none, because for the most part he's telling the truth. People who hate Moore are the same, Well off Middle and or Upper class, with no worries. You won't find too many poor people or people who lost there only job they know how to do, calling Moore a fraud and bum. Because they know the truth of what greed does. The Gordon Gecko's of the world still exist. And thats a damn shame.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Amazing. Just amazing.
artzau29 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Roger Moore has an ability to touch a funny bone but at the same time to capture the irony and ambiguity of our capitalist system. He's told by a straight-faced lobbyist for GM that it's OK that CEO Roger Smith gets a several million dollar increase in salary while people are getting evicted from their homes in Flint, MI. It's good, we're told, that businesses make money. That's why they're in business: to make money, not to provide social welfare. The lesson is lost somewhat in the feeble attempt to instill the great "entrepreneural spirit" that made America great in a dying community. Moore's persistence to get to Roger Smith is neatly blocked at every path, until the final episode when they crash the Christmas party and get more sympathetic blather about how dreadfully sorry they are, but, (as we can infer from having seen The Godfather) "Nothing personal. Just business." We can see that point of clarification on where the sympathy of the Roger Smiths had such a great impact on the mother getting evicted from her home on Christmas Eve. Angry, foul-mouthed? Yes, she was...and in sharp contrast to the oily smoothness of Roger Smith when he looks at Michael Moore like I used to look at cooked spinach when asked to go to Flint to see conditions there.

Moore's messages are often attacked as being "socialist," as I saw in a recent posting of a review of his recent Fahrenheit 9-11. Worse, "communist," said another, contending MM should be jailed for treason and his film(s) burned. I must confess that much of what he said rings true with the old signal tocsin from my earlier Red-baiting days in the 50s when calling someone a "commie" was worse than suggestions about the questionability of their parenthood. Yet, the stark reality of seeing communities gutted by "down-sizing," and the desperate hopelessness of laid-off workers being evicted from their shabby homes is sobering. We're faced with the questions of why do we endure the tragedies of having our production forces shipped off-shore to enhance the profits of corporate management and the stock-holders at the expense of our own labor force? We're going to pay one way or the other. The social costs of out-sourcing are more costly to us as a society than any trickle-down benefits gained by upper management and large corporate stockholders. We pay, they play. And, we should acknowledge a debt to this unkempt, shaggy bear of an obnoxious man who's not afraid to shove a mike in the face of these moguls and giants of industry who are asking us to pay for their pleasure.
19 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Story of Flint presaged what has happened since
AlsExGal5 February 2010
Michael Moore's first major film was one of his best in my opinion for two reasons. First off, since he did not yet have a trademark style, he did not try to go over the top in this film as much as he does in his subsequent efforts. He does his normal routine of tracking people down in an effort to embarrass them by asking them pointed questions, but for most of the film he lets the story and the citizens of Flint do the talking. As you probably already know, this is the story of Moore's hometown, Flint, Michigan, and the utter despair that fell upon it after GM began shuttering auto plants under the supervision of then CEO Roger Smith. The film really highlights how clueless Flint's elite are as to the suffering that all of this "consolidation" is causing. At one point in the film Moore is talking to some wealthy people at a party who seem to think they are doing the unemployed some kind of favor by hiring them to act as living statues at one of their fêtes. When he asks the party goers about what is going on in Flint they seem somewhat offended that there is such "negative publicity" circulating and say there should be more emphasis on the positive things going on in Flint - they name the symphony and the opera. Ah yes, let them eat opera glasses!

The second reason I consider this film to be one of Moore's best is that even though this film was made in 1989, it is still interesting and relevant today. This is because the contrast between what average working people have to endure - the struggle to find secure jobs with decent benefits and their increasing vulnerability - and the desire of the captains of industry to improve the bottom line at any cost ... as long as it doesn't cost them ... has only worsened and deepened over the last 21 years since this film was first made.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Michael Moore's Best Film - Silent Naive Protest of Free Trade
DKosty12331 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This film is the most creative of Moore's efforts. It details the plight of Flint, Michigan because of General Motors (GM) layoffs in the late 1980's. It is named Roger & Me because the films story line is Moore's pursuit of Roger Smith, the CEO of GM at this time, to find out why he is laying off all these workers & moving a bunch of jobs from Flint to Mexico.

This is before the twin disasters of NAFTA & GAAT in the 1990's by Bubba's Administration & Party in 1993. It is after Bubba's Party opened the doors for Free Trade in 1983. Moore's pursuit of Smith is super imposed over the compelling story of the suffering in Flint. All the story telling in this is well done. Trouble is the real target should have been Free Trade. Moore's vision is so narrow he misses the cause of Flint's problems.

Roger Smith made the decisions he made due to the tax law changes in 1983 for Corporations which gave the Labor Advantage to Foreign Workers. What a disaster we now have which Bubba Clinton, Smith and others made millions off. Because of Free Trade, the United States now has cleaner air than 89 other countries. The US is no longer a top polluter, all at the cost of several generations of American Workers who could not find jobs, and to our climate.

Multi-National Corporations used Free Trade to make more pollution worldwide, and make make climate change worse. Here Moore targets Smith and Reagan. Who should actually have been targeted are the 1983 Congress and Senate which were predominately Democratic and perhaps have inflicted the largest long term cost to the world and to Americans through their repeal of Franklin D. Roosevelts trade Controls he put in to make America strong and win World War 2 and beyond.

Roger Smith avoided Moore for a reason- he was afraid that Moore was not intelligent enough to understand why Smith was making decisions that were a disaster to the United States, but were being caused by the United States Government and the Democratic Party. Smith knew it would be a waste of time to explain that to the film maker.

FDR realized Free Trade does not work. It gave rise to Hitler and Stalin, and others in the 1930's. Now, Free Trade as started in 1983 and then the doors swung wide open in 1993 by Bill Clinton and others has given rise to Putin and China, much less the other threats from North Korea, Iran and other countries who see an America weakened by free trade.

The film clips of GM's heydays in the 1950's with Pat Boone & Dinah Shore provide a great intro to the film. There are several dramatic reactions by auto workers getting laid off & their desperation. The city of Flints angst is well documented too.

Moore never does catch Roger Smith. This is too bad because historically there is a very solid reason that GM started moving these jobs out of the country. Roger Smith would not have told the full truth if he had caught him. Smith would have told Moore that GM was doing the job exodus to remain competitive if cornered.

There is something more important which Moore missed & Smith would not tell. The reason GM had to move those jobs is because of a change in Corporate Taxes pushed through in the 1986 Tax Law changes. That change eliminated from the Corporate Tax code the cost of the legal deductions of employee benefits by American Corporations. This made American jobs less competitive with other countries.

Government did this in 1986 because they already knew the effect that baby boomer's aging would have on Medical costs, & knew if they remained deductible on US Corporations books, our Government could not afford the future cost of them being deductible. Before you blame Reagen for this, a reminder, the House & Senate were both controlled by Democrats when this passed.

Moore is not smart enough to figure this out, which is why this film does not rate a 10 with me. If American Corporations could still deduct employee health benefits on their taxes, there would be no need for National Health Care, & it would start to counter balance some of the effect of NAFTA & GAAT by making the American worker more competitive again. Unfortunately, that is not in both "Parties" best interest.

Post Script - Roger Smith (executive) Roger Bonham Smith (July 12, 1925 - November 29, 2007) was the Chairman and CEO of General Motors Corporation from 1981 to 1990, and is widely known as the main subject of Michael Moore's 1989 documentary film Roger & Me.

In 1981, Smith got the worlds largest car company and instead of looking for ways to grow the company which had more assets than any in the world, he started to destroy it. The results of his tenure became clear in less than 2 years after his death when GM went bankrupt and reorganized with major Federal Government help.

This movie has a historic sequence where Michael Moore alternates between his cop throwing people out of their homes who have lost GM jobs due to Smith, and Smith giving one of the most stupid Christmas speeches ever made by a CEO. Fortune Magazine has given Smith a very much deserved credit for destroying the worlds largest corporations, and this film illustrates it clearly. Trouble is what clearly was behind Smith's decisions were the Free Trade Laws which started in 1983.

TCM (Turner Classic Movies) ran an edited version of this "R" Rated Classic. The original is a very hard edged documentary. Too bad that like a Russian Missile that boomerangs the filmmaker is aiming at the wrong targets.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
For a beautiful representation of the divide between the have and have nots of this world, you cant go past 'Roger & Me'
spike067 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
For a beautiful representation of the divide between the have and have nots of this world, you cant go past 'Roger & Me'. Though quite dated in the aesthetics department, this 1988 doco by master left wing film maker 'Michael Moore', remains a poignant vision of greed and destruction of a town where the major industry (General Motors - who despite record profits up to then decided to close 11 U.S factories country wide & relocate them to Mexico paying the Mexican workers 70 cents / hr,) has shut up shop leaving 13,000 'Flint' locals out of a work. The flow on effect is catastrophic on the working class leaving many destitute fighting poverty and the eviction crew (evicting dozens of people a day, piling their belongings on the nature strip!), while they are unable to find further employment due to many of the town's businesses folding. No incomes means no spending, no spending means failed business. No businesses, means no jobs, no job no in come....well you get the picture. What is greatly insightful is the absolute ignorance the 'Wealthy' display of the troubles in their town, while playing a round of golf and discussing how many of the workers "Just don't want to work"!!!! Just goes to prove things don't change in society, the poor continue to get shafted & the rich are on the whole, selfish, in-sightless, arrogant pricks! I love the smooth over job by G.M, building a music hall and providing performances by crooner Pat Boone & other cabaret stars for half price for those out of work! Having the audacity to import a 'major' preacher to blow smoke up the population's collective arse. Just shows the contempt this company holds and the lengths it will go to distract them from the reality of their predicament! The G.M C.E.O chase is on in true 'Moore' fashion, his mission, a few answers and maybe a bit of interrogation. Looks like he'll have to look beyond his multi million dollar estate,the yacht or golf club!

General motors did a damn fine job of creating this apocalyptic landscape for the camera to document and Michael does a fine job of showing the bleakness and giving the viewer an insight of the people's painful predicament.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
So much for corporate responsibility...
lee_eisenberg21 September 2005
The world was introduced to Michael Moore through "Roger & Me", about the downsizing of the General Motors plant in Moore's hometown of Flint, Michigan, and the economic devastation that it caused. Moore spends much of the documentary trying to get in contact with GM CEO Roger Smith. He does get in contact with Smith in one scene but still doesn't convince him to come to Flint.

What Moore personally does in the documentary is of course less important than what we see happen to a previously idealistic American town as it completely falls apart. This should be required viewing for anyone wanting to know about American business. In fact, it should be required viewing for everyone.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very Bombastic but Entertaining
bbdawsons24 September 2018
If you didn't know who Michael Moore was and you watched it for the first time, it's very entertaining and informative. It's also very in your face and a different style of doc filmmakers. So, a fresh breath. But, fast forward to Michael Moore today and you realize all his docs are the same - very bombastic. He sits very strongly to the left and it's this extreme that hurts him in the end. Just watch this doc, none of his others and you're set.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A landmark documentary
patterson_j8112 December 2013
In case you're not aware, Roger and Me faced significant controversy from essentially political opponents, but also some scholars. Moore was charged with selective editing, shifting time relations (so that events seemed to follow one another when they didn't in reality) and so on. It is, however, a bit of an unfair charge, not least because these are frequently used strategies of narration.

As it happens, Moore's interwoven personal narrative of his home town is ripe for such explication, not least because the film is very clearly a very personal project. While Moore is clearly a key protagonist, his presence really does enhance the affectiveness of the film. While the precise sequence of events has indeed been tinkered with, this often happens not just for political affect but also narrative coherence. Either way, what happened to Flint is, by any measure imaginable a human catastrophe, and Moore's capacity to relate this is as powerful as can be.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Roger & Me
rd7-13 February 2005
Say what you want about all the historical inaccuracies in Michael Moore's Roger & Me, this film still accomplishes the overall goal of the director. Moore did not make this film simply intending to tell a story of Flint, Michigan. Instead he aimed to build support for the working class in a battle against the corporate elite.

Sure, the fact that the GM layoffs forcing 30,000 Flint residents into unemployment and effectively destroying the city's economy actually took place slowly over a long period of time slightly diminishes the shock value of the film. However, one must remember that these are still real people Moore is interviewing, and their lives have been altered by the layoffs. It does not matter if they were laid off in 1981 or 1984 or years later. The sad state their lives are in is more than enough to prove that the GM layoffs did so significant, although possibly not as significant as Moore would have us believe.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Biased and Fictional
JStiles856 September 2005
I was forced to watch this film for my World Reigonal Geography class. This film is what is wrong with America today, instead of figuring out the best way out of hard times or situations we would rather complain about how it is someone else's fault. This film goes through the downfall of Flint, Michigan and blames it 100% on General Motors. In the process of doing so Moore goes to great lengths to make the executives of General Motors out to be villains just because they are doing their job in a capitalist society. Moore films several evictions throughout the film and does not ever even ask once if the person is being evicted because of a GM layoff. Additionally, he never interviews the landlords of the tenants filmed. Moore goes to great lengths to twist historical events to fit his political agenda in this film of pure propaganda.
21 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed