Dracula: The Series (TV Series 1990–1991) Poster

(1990–1991)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Warning: Episodes are in the wrong order
CountVladDracula24 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I was watching the Dracula the series DVD set and I realized there is a pretty big mistake and this mistake dates back to the series' original air dates.

The final episode of the series is Klaus Encounters of the Interned Kind. This ends with the semi-cliff hanger of Gustav Helsing following Lucard (Dracula) and Klaus through a portal in Dracula's castle. And the boys Christopher and Max preparing to return to America with all of Gustav's notes. Yet someone made the mistake of airing the episode My Dinner with Lucard after Klaus Encounters of the Interned Kind.

My Dinner with Lucard is a clips episode of all the previous episodes (leading up to Klaus Encounters of the Interned Kind) and turned out to be a dream of Gustav Helsing. This is clearly set BEFORE he followed Lucard through the portal. I do not know why it was aired in the wrong order or why the DVD set maintains this misorder.

Otherwise it's a great DVD set of a fun TV series in the vein (if you pardon the pun) of shows like Goosebumps. The show focuses on the adventures of sixteen-year-old Christopher Townsend and his ten-year-old brother Max Townsend. They take up residence with their Uncle Gustav Helsing who lives with a local student, Sophie. Chris and Max soon learn that their uncle is actually a vampire hunter from a long line of vampire hunters and their biggest thread is Alexander Lucard, a highly successful and corrupt corporate mogul (sort of like David Xanatos of Gargoyles) who turns out to be Dracula himself. It's a fun show but jut be wary of the mistake in the episode order.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Awesome Series!!!!
kpgrm22 December 2004
I have to tell you...this series is just perfect. I am a horror movie buff...I love everything from the serious to the seriously campy. But this show is so classic. I have all 21 episodes on DVD and they are worth every penny. Of course this show is campy but it is supposed to be...they wouldn't have it any other way. Cute series for young adults or children. Good story lines. Each episode leads you to believe...when are they going to kill or be killed? I would definitely recommend for anyone that likes some of the 80's, 90's campy horror classics that Platinum Disc Corp. puts out (Platinum put this series out on DVD).
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dracula: The Series was before it's time...
Rubygurl7820 September 2003
I really don't think that Dracula: The Series was "corny" at all, in fact, you can't really compare it to "Friday the 13th" or the "Nightmare" movies at all. The best way to explain the series is to compare it to modern-day Buffy: The Vampire Slayer. The series was more campy than anything else, but on occation, did explore darker themes. All in all, it was a good show and frankly a lot of fun. If it had come out now instead of then, I think the show would have gone on for more than 21 episodes.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Saturday morning fun show
phbalanced14 April 2004
A couple of American kids staying with their uncle in Belgium become vampire sleuths when they discover that the most powerful man by the name of Alexander Lucard, a business mogul in Europe, has minions and other vampires running the entire area where they are staying. The kids are joined by their Uncle Gustav and his charge, Sophie, to fight the evil Lucard using the traditional vampire-fighting agents and interestingly enough, develop their own state-of-the art inventions, one of which was a laser gun called The Boffin. Another was a protein type drink which gave off electrical shocks to keep vampires at bay. Memorable guest stars include Lucard's arch rival Nosferatu, brilliantly played by the late Denis Forest. Full season one ends with a cliffhanger but the series was not renewed. Great cast line up led by veteran stage performers Geordie Johnson as Lucard and Bernard Behrens as vampire hunter Uncle Gustav Helsing.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Actually pretty good
domino100318 January 2004
Warning: Spoilers
This was actually a pretty good series. Sure, it had a typical plot: Alucard (Dracula spelled backward, of course. Why doesn't anyone EVER notice that?)runs a big money business and some nosy kids and uncle find out who he is. Of course, Dracula must be destroyed, but any horror buff knows, it's not as easy as it sounds. If that was the case, it wouldn't have been a weekly series. would it? Unfortunately, the series lasted 1 season, and with a doozy of a cliffhanger that will never be resolved. Thankfully, it is available on DVD, and for those who never caught the series when it was first aired, then here is your chance to catch this classic. Keep your eye out for a pre-"Forever Knight" Geraint Wyn Davies as the treacherous Klaus, with a tie to Van Helsing.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't dismiss this as just a kid's series! Worth the watching.
insightstraight7 January 2006
"Dracula: The Series" had all the elements of a forgettable kid's series, but was saved from that crowded ghetto by lush locations (Luxembourg), clever writing, and the wonderful presence of Geordie Johnson as the title character.

Handsome, confident, and typically with a slight smile playing about his lips, Johnson brings a nice interpretation to the role. Rather than the tortured and sometimes wimpy psycho-studies we have too-often been subjected to in the vampire realm, Johnson's Dracula delights in being eternal and powerful -- he embraces his condition with relish. His Dracula is believably aristocratic and beguiling, while still being ruthless.

Like any serial involving valiant hunters after evil, this show requires a certain suspension of disbelief. A multi-billionaire businessman as well as a vampire, Dracula could quickly snuff out his pursuers, either supernaturally or, far easier, just by arranging an "accident". But like all serials the foes have to continue so the stories can continue.

The series at first focuses more on the children, even attempting to develop the older brother as a teen heartthrob, and tries to be topical by having Dracula listening to hip-hop and ska (and even making a Milli Vanilli joke). But it seems the show's producers quickly realized the appeal of Johnson, and began tailoring the show more to his talents.

The scripts start moving away from the precocious younger brother and the teen angst of the older kids, to more mature themes -- later scripts are versions of "Casablanca" and "Pygmalion", and there is actually some very interesting examination of what it would be like to be immortal. A definite plus is the continuing character provided by Geraint Wyn Davies (later to be a vampire again in "Forever Knight", likely partly due to this role). Davies' Klaus has a lively maniacal presence, and a very memorable Frank-Gorshin-as-The-Riddler laugh.

The show could easily have devolved into camp, but somehow never quite starts down that slippery slope. Johnson is especially to be credited for delivering his character's lines in such a way as to keep them from sounding tongue-in-cheek -- he comes off rather as being eternally amused by life, and in fact values his opponents as a tool against boredom. The closest the show ever comes to being corny or self-mocking is in the final episode, a "clips show" recapping the entire series. (The production had obviously received word that the show was being canceled, as this show serves as a final episode.)

"Dracula: The Series" is a worthy addition to the vampire genre and deserves a look from anyone interested in the tradition. There are a few scenes which make as valid a commentary on the vampire state as other, more "serious" works; the writing is clever and surprisingly complex. It should not be overlooked because of being perceived only as a series for children.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I had to wait 15 years to see this show!!
SkippyDevereaux4 April 2005
This is a great series. I found it for a very reasonable price, around $16.00 dollars, and snapped it up quickly. I remember wanting to see this when it first came out in 1990, but none of the television stations in my area carried it. I never imagined that I would have to wait 15 years to see it!! Geordie Johnson was a very good Dracula, not over-the-top or flamboyant like some actors who have portrayed this role in the past. Mr. Johnson has a very good speaking voice. It really fit the part magnificently. The actors that portrayed the kids were, for a change, not obnoxious or overtly cutesy. Sometimes a kid can kill a good program or movie and thankfully, they did not in this show. I only wish that this series had been able to have a final wrap-up episode.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Horrifically Campy
hoodedvoodoo30 August 2004
I loved this show as a kid! Of course, if I saw it now I might feel otherwise. The show was terribly campy but always entertaining. In addition to vampire henchmen, A. Lucard (i.e. "Dracula" backwards) also had a host of ghoulish zombies to do his bidding.

Geordie Johnson, who played Lucard, was oh-so sexy and alluring in this role, always the suave gentleman. He had the added-bonus of being able to transform into a flock of bats. The kids and Uncle Gustav would always invariably get themselves into a sticky situation, out of which they would miraculously escape within the alloted time-frame.

I would love to get my hands on old episodes of this show!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fun but dark
alpalmer28 July 2003
Though this show was billed as family entertainment, it still has its darker moments. Be prepared to suspend disbelief - and enjoy the puns and jokes while you're at it. Definitely worth a look... you might just find that you enjoy it! Geordie Johnson, Mia Kirshner, & Bunny Behrens are great!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
i remember this...
king200015 February 2003
i was a kid when this show was on, and it was a show for me!... not real scary or anything but had its moments... also that guy from "Forever Night" (Geraint Wyn Davies) played the part of helsings son turn vamp... and that was a cool show... i would love if sci fi channel would air the old shows that didn't make it to the big time....
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dracula done Disney Style
lgb007725 August 2001
Though lacking the violence and blood in typical vampire movies, this series still carried interesting storylines in each episode. I saw most episodes and still have a few today. It was not meant to be scary flick just interesting. I never found it corny. If it was out on DVD or Tape, I'd buy it.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dracula: the family show
dudeman568512 December 2004
Its on DVD. I got the first 11 episodes off the 5.99 rack at Best Buy.

This show is corny. Very corny. But it knows it is and doesn't take it self too seriously. I believe this was a kids show aimed at army brats and expatriots kids in Europe. It really bizarre how this is supposed to be in Spain or somewhere and every one, including the police captain, speak with an American accent. I love how Sophie is always making snide comments about Americans but doesn't even attempt to hide her accent.

Its nice show for Vampire completest and Americans living abroad with kids.

(BTW, Geraint Wyn Davies is in this as a vampire. This was two years before "Forever Knight". And Mia Kershner is in this as Sophie, long before her staring role in "The L Word.")
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good but could have been better
jp170116 February 2006
I first saw Dracula the TV series when I was nine. I liked it so much I became obsessed with vampires I even walk around in a black cape calling myself 'Dracula' I would were it every where even to the beach, yes I was that stupid. As I got older I stop doing that of course but I still credit this series for peaking an interest that later led me into Anne Rice. Seeing it now I have to view it a little more critically. The children (Max and Chris) are either written and/or acted poorly. Chris for example is made out of stereotypes that adults think of kids, Chris is into rap but never acts like it and all plays guitar like he is more into rock and role. They are in 'Europe' we never know where exactly and in the entire series I only count two other people other than Dracula himself who speaks with something other than an American accent, Sophie (who is still hot today)for example,always talks about 'American girls' while speaking in an American accent. Also the shows are only a half and hour, which makes everything, feel rushed. It also makes for slow development, the first episode is not very good, but pilots rarely are do to the fact that they take up most of their time explaining who everyone and what everything is but here they have to do that for two episodes. It's in the second episode in which they finally get around to explaining what it is that vampire bites can do. They can either leave you dead, turn you into a zombie, or make you into a vampire. They never get around to explaining how a vampire chooses which one to use but it is a good that they cleared up why Vampires are not over populating the Earth. Anne Rice's version was better but I like Dracula can make an Army of Zombies whenever he wants.

The series has three saving graces. The first is Gordie Johnson's portrayal of Dracula is fun and incredible it still inspires me the way it did my nine-year old self. (Okay maybe not that extreme but I like him a lot better than the Buffy version.) The second is concept is the modern Dracula. It reminds me of Marv Wolvman's modernized version of Superman archenemies Lex Luthor. When you think of Count Dracula you think of the old vampire who became the Count of Transylvania, lives in castle with all his gold and spends his nights terrorizing the local population. What would Dracula do in modern times in our capitalistic democracy? Well for starters he would keep his money in a bank as opposed to his castle. He builds a huge corporate empire in order to gain power on the world stage. He cannot call himself Dracula anymore so he calls himself, Alexander Lucard (A.Lucard is Dracula backwards to fool the ignorant.) The third is their take on Dracula in relation to other vampires. In almost all other mediums (Dracula 2000, Blade, Van Helsing, and even Buffy the Vampire Slayer) Count Dracula is portrayed as the first vampire and/or as a super-vampire who cannot be destroyed by the same way as other vampires. In this portrayal we see Dracula who is just a vampire (neither the oldest nor most powerful) who is the worlds greatest vampire because he is just smarter then all the others. He is in control of his vampire nature not the other way around.

In closing this was a great series I just think there was a lot of potential wasted, it did not add up to Buffy the Vampire Slayer material. Though it did one thing better than Buffy and that is the way vampires looked when they were vampires. Vampires are not supposed to be ugly when they are vampires. I am complete convert to Anne Rice's idea that all vampires are supposed to be pretty. Werewolves do the ugly thing not vampires. Dracula the series accomplishes this.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed