To Sleep with Anger (1990) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Could possibly be one of the best portraits of the devil
Gloede_The_Saint3 August 2011
What a strange, powerful, unsettling and unique film. If you want to experience the tingling of terror, than over the course of 97 minutes becomes more and more apparent, this might be the film for you. Some of it is more ambition than execution. Sometimes it tries to be a bit too profound, and some of the acting is a bit low key, but I have never seen anything like this in my life.

We first she him in the shape of an old friend. We hear a knock on the door and in comes Harry, the family friend who hasn't set a foot in the town for 30 years. He makes it clear that he was heading somewhere else, but needed a rest after a long bus ride. The old married couple invites him to stay, but our friend Harry never leave. He seems so friendly, but one on one he can make the most unsettling remarks that would crawl under the skin of anybody.

His past could very well be covered with blood, and his present surroundings starts to descend into hell. Danny Glover plays the magnetic and devilish persona, and this is certainly his magnum opus. Never seen such an enigmatic and bigger than life performance from him, and few could match it. Some become his disciples, others look at his with hate. It's built around, or perhaps within the mystique between old folklore, superstition and religion Some of it is slightly simple minded. And it's allusions to the devil and the battle between good and evil might seem a tad forced. But this is certainly one for the books.
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a lovely gem of a film
MissRosa1 September 2000
For the last several visits to the video store, I've been drawn to this film, but it wasn't until a few days ago that I finally rented it. And I'm really glad I did.

This film glows with delicately-drawn character studies. It is a testament to the effectiveness of subtle storytelling. The story is good, and the characters are gentle but passionate. They are middle class folks who live in a pleasant neighborhood in LA. They have left the hardscrabble life of the South -- with all the attendant superstitions and fears -- behind. Or so they hope...

The responses that the characters have to the presence of evil in their midst are refreshing and true. Though the film is subtle, it never drags, gets sentimental, or sloshes into easy cliches.

Danny Glover is wonderful, but so are most of the other actors. Oh, it's about family, but in a way that attracts us. There are no tried and true gimmicks, no diseases du jour, no soapy interludes. Just people. Doing the best they can. They are sometimes funny, sometimes foolish, sometimes predictable. One thing we notice: they can seem excessively patient with out-of- town visitors...
29 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Intense Character Studies
Hitchcoc23 November 2020
This film involves a black family in southern California. They have a rather autocratic father who is impatient but also kind. There are two brothers who are polar opposites. One is shiftless and married and searching for a place in the world. The other is hard working and settled but also rather dull. Then an old friend named Harry shows up. He is played by the gregarious Danny Glover. The problem is this guy is evil but charming. Soon bad things happen. I rented this blindly and am glad I got a chance to watch it. It has a wonderful cast with Richard Brooks as the wayward son and several other fine actors.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
somewhat elusive, but stick with it
mjneu598 January 2011
One good role for Danny Glover can erase the memory of several 'Lethal Weapon' and 'Predator' sequels, but it took a small, independently produced feature to bring the best out of one of Hollywood's hardest working actors. In this modest comedy Glover plays an enigmatic travelin' man named Harry, arriving unannounced at the home of some old friends and adding a subtle tension to the domestic friction already eroding three generations of family ties. But the trouble with Harry is less what he is than what he represents: the ghost of old traditions lurking in the cultural closet, and for a family already sensitive to portents and omens he might be the embodiment of all their superstitions. Writer director Charles Burnett keeps the viewer on guard with his elusive plot and complex characters, but the film is understated almost to a fault. The metaphors and hidden meanings (better suited to a stage play) help create a portentous mood, but in the end leave a lot unexplained.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A portrayal of good and evil as excellent. . .
jericho411931 January 2004
. . . as I have ever seen on film. Danny Glover is an incredibly convincing devilish character - tossed into the midst of your average, striving African-American family. To see his interplay with the parents - who thought they had left their small town ways and superstitions behind - as well as with the two sons - an almost classical prodigal son story - was to witness what surely was one of the best movies of a great movie decade. This movie cemented my status as an ardent admirer of the work of Charles Burnett, surely the cream of the new crop of talented American directors. This is a very suspenseful film, one that will enlighten those with a desire to learn more about the Black experience in America.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
TO SLEEP WITH ANGER deserves to be seen by a larger demography
lasttimeisaw18 March 2019
Charles Burnett is the unsung vanguard of African-American cinema, who starts his career years before Spike Lee, yet whose output is far less prolific, TO SLEEP WITH ANGER is only his third feature, after KILLER OF SHEEP (1978) and MY BROTHER'S WEDDING (1983).

The life of South Los Angeles inhabitants Gideon and Suzie (Butler and Alice) starts to unravel when an old friend from the South, Harry (Glover) blows in one day, out of hospitality and bonhomie, they invite Harry to stay as long as he wishes. After backhanded remarks questioning the philanthropic work of Gideon and Suzie's elder son Junior (Lumbly) and his wife Pat (McGee), who is gravid with a baby number two, Harry finds his perfect target in Gideon and Suzie's younger son Samuel aka. Baby Brother (Brooks), whose immaturity, trivial grievance and maladaptive fatherhood gives the access of Harry's macho, wheedling male-bonding of going back to the South, which brings tension between Baby Brother and his family, especially with his wife Linda (Ralph), who is haplessly juggling between her career and traditional drudgery assigned to a wife, child-rearing and domestic chores.

Bad omen foreshadows Harry's arrival, the opening surreal self-combusted metaphor and the breaking of Gideon's charm all presage that it is a hostage to fortune to allow Harry overstaying his welcome. In Burnett's progressive thinking, there isn't much gray zone in the tradition versus urbanization tug-of-war, Harry, an incarnation of the vileness of a hidebound mindset (characterized by male chauvinism and superstition), is a menace with an elusive ulterior motive, and Danny Glover submerses deeply into Harry's dark side with a simian, hail-fellow-well-met expansiveness that is only betrayed by his piercing, menacing glint, shrouded in a mystical aura, he is mesmeric enough to hold our attention, but we have no idea what is he up to, because gradually Harry is reduced to a symbol, an unequivocal bad influence, which makes his comeuppance a bit blunt, if there is any redeeming feature in him, it is totally under our radar.

Above all, TO SLEEP WITH ANGER is an ensemble piece, great performances are actualized, barring the top-billing Glover, also by its distaff players: Mary Alice, who is not just a devoted wife, a capable ob-gyn doctor, but also a witty and sensible mother, and knows how to live up to be the pillar of the household when the crunch befalls; Sheryl Lee Ralph, whose suffering wife of a man-child is mostly poignant, and Ethel Ayler, who plays Hattie, an old acquaintance whose newborn faith projects a searing antagonism against Harry even before he reveals his true colors. Good impression is dwindled on the man's front, Paul Butler's Gideon is taken to his bed most of the time, Carl Lumbly is prone to be an empty vessel (by making the most noise) and Richard Brooks has the juiciest role, but is squandered by a script which portrays him as the good-for-nothing every has to condone with.

That said, TO SLEEP WITH ANGER deserves to be seen by a larger demography (it is a 4-times Independent Spirit winner if that doesn't mean nothing), for its steady deconstruction-and-reconstruction of familial bonds, for its unpretentious ethnic portrayal, and most prominently, for Burnett's unorthodox, pragmatic perspective on African-Americans' assimilation and adjustment in a modern society.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Everyone's Got Problems
boblipton1 March 2021
Danny Glover shows up at the door of his old friends and moves in. Over the next few weeks, a lot of stuff happens.

Charles Burnett's movie seems to be a slice of life piece, showing the variety and contradictions of a small Black community, nominally in Los Angeles. There are tough guys and weak guys, but it's a solid working-class community where the choir sings polite gospel, and the preacher comes to visit the visit and chide them for using "old-fashioned" obeah cures instead of prayer.

This isn't the world of rap or youth, but of the older, settled community. In some ways it seems idyllic, with no drug dealers or gang violence, the standard modern cinematic image of Black communities. There's no rap music, but there is the blues and a small boy playing a trumpet very loudly.

It's warm and frequently silly, and beneath it is a had recognition of being unregarded. I found it very familiar, and if the older folks had been speaking Yiddish, i might have been, if not my own home growing up, then a cousin's, or that of one of my father's old friends.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Truly exceptional movie
deadbull-9517110 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
To me, without doubt, Danny Glover's best movie. When a bad man invades a normal household in the guise of a welcome family guest a lot of things start to happen. It plays out in very subtle ways. Glover is never gross or overt, but he's the Devil for sure. Beautifully paced and shot...it is perfectly simply 'what it is.'

I suppose it will appeal more to 'matured' tastes...because it's a movie about character...no bang bang stuff here. Subtlety doesn't have to be boring with this much intelligence behind it.....Can't go wrong watching this....
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Oversubtle evilness
andromaro15 April 2023
This movie is undeniably well crafted but it didn't particularly click with me. Perhaps it requires a rewatch in order to hit the mark, but it was not striking enough to make want to revisit it.

A quiet family is upset by the arrival of an old acquaintance whose nasty personality slowly seeps throughout the household. I've found the acting generally solid, especially Glover who plays his character so naturally that it feels unintentionally evil.

It feels a bit too dragged towards the end, and the whole figurative thing of the mutual exclusion between father and acquaintance seems a bit of a stretch, but I wouldn't pan this film too much.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
To Sleep With Anger is the greatest american film of the 90's
ericpegnam1 September 2002
"To Sleep with Anger" It is one of the richest film experiences I've had in a very long time. Since I saw it in 1993, no other American film has seemed as winning and varied as this one. It is a film I return to again and again, for the brilliant ensemble cast, the witty writing and the blend of humor, folklore and tragedy. There are no cinematic pyrotechnics. Mr. Burnett's approach to filmmaking is deceptively simple and yet his film seems far richer and more cinematic than many a more "sophisticated filmmaker". Mr. Burnett has taste and economy. He knows where to place his camera for the greatest effect and how to edit his films in a way that enhances the drama of each scene, rather than using edits to manufacture drama in a scene that is dramatically inert. He is a filmmaker of integrity and genius. This is his masterpiece.
26 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enjoyable but lacking any particular insight
This was probably a nice night at the live theatre back in the day. And as a quiet movie with a killer music bed, I thoroughly enjoyed it.

I'm grateful it got made at all. A movie about people. Real people. It certainly illustrates the massive talent of Danny Glover. I'm ashamed to say that as soon as I hear his name, those juvenile Lethal Weapon movies pop into my head. Yet as of this writing he's got more than 200 credits on IMDB, and appears to be busier than ever.

Am I the only viewer who fell in love with Ethyl Ayler? I don't know whether it was the glorious white hair. The way she sang that torch song at the house party. Or just her general cheekiness. But that was one s3xy 59-year-old woman.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Gideon loses his mojo
jshoaf29 March 2021
This film reminded me a bit of some of Toni Morrison's novels-about the shared heritage of American descendants of slaves, the grief and the magic. The film begins in a Black neighborhood that is if anything a more virtuous reflection of postwar middle-class white neighborhoods: neatly-kept bungalows with big yards, kids playing in the street (and with pigeons on the rooftop) and practicing musical instruments (a trumpet, in this case), a paterfamilias who keeps chickens and irons his own slacks, a mother who supplements her shopping with produce from her own garden and works as a midwife, two handsome sons with wives and a (quiet, respectful) child each.... The main problem is that the younger son's wife is bored silly by the agricultural table-talk at Sunday dinner: she sells real estate, and that is what land is to her. Also, the roof leaks, and the two sons can't get together to fix it.

Then Gideon remarks that he can't find his "toby" (thank you, subtitles, and also Wikipedia for mentioning this as a synonym of a mojo), a teapot with marbles in it falls to the floor and breaks, and Harry arrives. Harry is from that place in the South from which Gideon and Suzie emigrated when their sons were children. Harry is the drinking, gambling, womanizing friend who keeps his possessions in a few cardboard boxes instead of a bungalow. He draws to him a whole crowd of Gideon's fellow emigrés, mostly men, and with them comes fierce misogyny and the potential for violence.

Enough with the plot summary. This is a rich and entertaining film. I see that many of the other reviews are from this very month, so I guess it has just started streaming.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
to sleep with anger
mossgrymk21 March 2021
Or The Triumph Of The Black Yuppies. Did not care for it. Good performances from a wonderful ensemble cast saves it from utter perdition. C plus.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A little creepy
HotToastyRag24 October 2021
You'll get a good idea from the opening credits that this movie is a little creepy. A man sits in a chair, and as the credits progress, parts of him catch on fire. The synopsis tells you that a charismatic old friend returns to town and stirs up trouble, but that's putting it mildly. Danny Glover plays the old friend, and while he's all smiles and laughter upon his entrance, he clearly has an odd aura about him. Wherever he goes, arguments follow. True, the family he visits was already having some problems before he got there (which makes you wonder what would happen if he visited a truly innocent family), but they escalate in his presence.

If you're paying attention, you'll notice some clues. Danny stays at home while the rest of the family goes to church. He resists shaking the hand of a pregnant woman; is he avoiding the innocent vibes of the unborn? While nothing ever gets really spelled out, you can guess what's going on. To Sleep with Anger could have been a whole lot scarier or creepier, but it's pretty tame, especially compared to modern movies. If you're expecting satanic cults and animal sacrifices, you're going to be disappointed. Just keep in mind that it's a domestic drama that's extremely vague and still manages to make you feel uncomfortable. It's not one I'd choose to watch again, but I'm usually up for watching a Danny Glover movie. The members of the family are played by Mary Alice, DeVaughn Nixon, Paul Butler, Carl Lumbly, Richard Brooks, Sheryl Lee Ralph, Vonetta McGee, Reina King, and Cory Curtis.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
...then the last preacher said, "My sin is the worst of all".
SteveSkafte12 December 2009
Maybe it was the bizarre photo of a smirking, card-holding Danny Glover that always gave me the wrong impression of this film. I'm not entirely sure what I expected it to be, but I'm relatively certain I wasn't expecting a quiet family drama.

Writer/director Charles Burnett doesn't reach hard for big statements. The film appears to take place in the 1950s-60s (I couldn't be sure), but the time period isn't chosen out of a desire to create a plot focused on race relations. In fact, the drama is entirely centered around a single small family, and a wild friend from way in the past (Harry, played by Danny Glover). Cinematographer Walt Lloyd creates a familiar environment, whether or not it happens to be personally familiar to the viewer. Everything feels warm and slightly worn, including personalities and ways of speaking.

Although my personal family history couldn't be more different than the family depicted in this film, the character of Samuel "Babe Brother" (Richard Brooks) really hit home for me. His attitude on life and relationship with his father mirrors my own all too closely. It's the honestly of character depiction and interaction that brings out so much truth from Charles Burnett's writing. Everything comes together to make a perfectly realized story of absolute truth. This may just be a great film.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
outstanding
susanlilyofthevalley24 July 2007
This movie is very deep...you have to really pay attention in order to get the seriousness of the underlying message. If you pay attention and apply the lessons to your own life you may be able to identify people like the character that Danny Glover portrayed. It has a very deeply religious appreciation for the fact that love covers a multitude of sin. The mother's love brought her family back together and her husband back to life. The garden died and the man of the house fell ill after Danny Glover's character arrived uninvited, unannounced and undermining everything that the family's values were based upon. The mother was a God fearing woman, but she turned to old wives tales remedies rather than standing firmly on her faith in God. Until she remembered that God was the only one that could help her she suffered from lack of faith not knowledge. The man of the house was the spiritual gate keeper for the family, but he allowed his guard down due to misplaced loyalty to an old friend...or at least what he thought was an old friend. He nearly lost his life and his family behind the thoughtless decision to allow a stranger to stay in his home. Danny Glover's character explained to the woman of the house that just as she has a purpose in life he did as well, regardless to the fact that their purposes were in direct opposition to one another. A lesson in life to choose your friends carefully and always know who and what you are dealing with. Pay close attention to the movie and even closer attention to your acquaintances and your surroundings.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The great thing about this film is that it is totally free from B-Movie material, this film has A-movie material in it.
mattskocik20 November 2001
Charles Burnett is an excellent director, he knows how to make a unique film. Danny Glover is the best part of this film, followed by a string of fine performances. There is no shootings or people getting killed, just happy family life. This film is very unforgettable in the way that there is no other film like it,and that's always a good thing. I am so sick of seeing Hollywood trash, all they care about is money and fame. This film is a genius, you never get tired of the film because of it's caring message. The other thing that is great about this film, is that it is totally free from B-movie material, this film has A-movie material in it. Charles Burnett is defenity a talented director, I just hope he can make more films like this gem. I give this film a 10 out of a 10 grade.:::::::::: top movie"
14 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Family time
kosmasp15 May 2021
Movies always are experienced differently. Depending on your own background and life experience you will see things different than and the other way around too. In this case someone not just from America, but also someone of color (not necessarily from that time period, but doesn't hurt) will have more insight on certain things than I did.

Having said, there are many universal themes here, that anyone who grew up with more than just having his or her parents around will recognize. This is family time, this comprehensible for the majority. And the character studies in here ... the struggle, the pain, the connections, the dreams and the relationships all do feel quite "real". Danny Glover apparently was the one that helped the movie get of the ground - his Lethal Weapon fame came to good use. And he was not too old for that ... no pun intended.

So if you are into family drama and no cliches about hoods and black on black crime - you will get a movie you will appreciate a lot.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Tale of Domestic Interloper Suffers from Insanely Slow-Moving Narrative and Underdeveloped Plot
Turfseer1 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Upon its initial release in 1990, "To Sleep with Anger" went largely unnoticed, owing to poor distribution. However, over the years, the film has garnered critical acclaim as a significant domestic drama centered around an African American family residing in South Los Angeles. In 2017, it was recognized and selected for preservation in the Library of Congress's National Film Registry.

Regrettably, despite its recognition and acclaim, I found myself struggling to engage with the movie. The most prominent issue lies in its excruciatingly slow pace, taking an extended duration before introducing the central antagonist, Harry, played by Danny Glover.

Before Harry's arrival, the film primarily focuses on exploring the dynamics of the household he eventually disrupts. The family consists of elder parents Gideon and Suze, along with their two adult sons: the composed Junior and the unstable Samuel (also known as Baby Brother), both of whom are married with children. The brothers harbor resentment towards each other, with Junior criticizing Baby Brother for not fulfilling his responsibilities as a father and providing support to their parents.

Harry is intended to embody a devilish figure, sowing discord within the family. However, director Charles Burnett takes a remarkably subtle approach to the character, eschewing the use of overt supernatural elements present during the credits, where Harry is depicted sitting in a chair with his feet bursting into flames.

Unfortunately, this subtlety leads to a lack of memorable suspenseful events that should have driven Harry's eventual alienation from the family, culminating in a violent confrontation.

The most menacing aspect of the invited interloper is the knife he carries, accompanied by expressions of superstitious beliefs, hinting at a dark past. Moreover, Harry's misogyny becomes evident as he alludes to the once-libertine life of the now reformed Hattie.

In modern terms, Harry could easily be described as a passive-aggressive character, unable to control his innate negativity. Ultimately, Suze, the family matriarch, asks him to leave, while Gideon's health declines drastically.

The narrative only gains momentum towards the end of the second act when Baby Brother brandishes a knife against Junior, leading to Suze injuring her hand while intervening. Intriguingly, Baby Brother was about to run away with Harry, who encouraged him to find another woman.

The "agent provocateur" finally meets his end, suffering a heart attack and dying on the kitchen floor. The film has been labeled a "black comedy" on Wikipedia, partly due to the darkly humorous finale where Harry's body remains unclaimed, possibly due to the County Coroner's bias against their African American heritage or simply because they are overwhelmed with other cases.

At least there is a glimmer of a happy ending, with Gideon's recovery and the reconciliation of the two siblings.

Glover's portrayal of the devilish troublemaker is convincingly executed, despite the film's overly subtle approach. The rest of the cast performs well, but they are constrained by a slow-moving script that lacks significant plot points and reversals, which could have made the story more engaging.

"To Sleep with Anger" may have earned recognition for its portrayal of domestic turmoil in an African American family, but its excruciatingly slow pacing and underdeveloped plot prevent it from becoming a truly captivating cinematic experience.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
When the Devil makes you do it...
higherall71 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Some people like to meditate and philosophize about The Tragic Condition of Man. Others like to deliver you over to the idea that Life is a game. While still more will tell you shut up with all that stuff because Life is strictly business and the sooner you get used to that fact the better off you will be, sucker. Finally others will show up at your door to humbly ask whether or not this is where folks is having the party.

As an African American, I can happily say I belong to the last group. I recall as a youngster of about five or six waking up to the sound of laughing and the smell and crackling of fried chicken on the stove and being asked by the smiling faces of relatives how I was doing today and knowing they were eager and interested about my welfare and really cared. I would go to bed at night under warm covers and the sound of more laughter as chicken was again sizzling in the kitchen with me hoping it would never come to an end. This film is a slice of that. Pick you out a drumstick, a breast or a wing, Junior...

I would tell you that it takes all kinds to make a world, but I think I just did. Every once in awhile, you will find a dude showing up who gives off this strange set of vibes about something you can't quite put your finger on. Oh, he says all the right things and does all the right things and observes all the social niceties, but still there's that something that's off and doesn't quite fit. Sometimes he doesn't speak at all. He just stands there and you are witness to an almost imperceptible shift and change in the mood of the social atmosphere. This happened to me one time while I was putting on the performance of one of my One-Act Plays at a local Coffee House here in Detroit. This fellow came in waiting for his wife to get off work that night and I swear he exuded the most murderous wrath of anybody I ever encountered. All with a straight face and turning to you the most placid of countenances. I can't tell you how relieved I was to see him go. I remarked to James Wheeler, one of the founders of Concept East, about this later and he simply chuckled.

TO SLEEP WITH ANGER (1990) is about something on this order. I remember in the entertainment field a lot of times I would see black performers overdo stuff because they were trying to prove or demonstrate that they were just as good or better than the White Man. What is truly great about this film is how it is a masterpiece of mood, atmosphere and understatement. Understatement is not something I usually associate with actors too much. I think about Sammy Davis Junior's hectic prancing or the roaring of James Earl Jones or the scenery chewing of Samuel L. Jackson and you go with it because after all, acting is basically about "Look at me! Look at me! Look at me!", to quote the venerable Lawrence Olivier. But as Cecilia Gomez would retort, "Art revealed is artifice, Art concealed is Art.", and there is plenty written and hidden between the lines here.

This is the Down South Vibration as I have so rarely seen it convincingly represented. The other examples that immediately come to mind are SOUNDER (1972), as well as Don Cheadle and Denzel Washington playing Mouse and Easy Rawlins in DEVIL IN A BLUE DRESS (1995) respectively. Writer and Director Charles Burnett is to be applauded for so successfully transplanting this vibration to the big city of Los Angeles. Here the atmosphere of 'Down Home' is even stronger.

The characters are all very vivid and make me recall my Uncles and Aunts down in Mobile, Alabama. To my mind, there is not a stereotype in the bunch despite of all their foolishness. While there doesn't seem to be much plot or story here, it really is all about the clouds descending upon this particular African American family and then parting and lifting with a naturalistic flow that Eddie Murphy flirted with in his classic HARLEM NIGHTS (1989). Danny Glover leads the cast playing a certain Harry who, as they would say, is somehow not wrapped too tight, but memorable performances from Paul Butler as the beleaguered father Gideon, Mary Alice as mother Suzie, Sheryl Lee Ralph as Linda, along with Carl Lumbly as Junior and Vonetta McGee as Pat with Richard Brooks as Babe Brother among others make this a folksy ensemble effort.

Anyway, I hear someone ringing the doorbell. Somebody get that. Don't worry about Harry, he's been here since last morning. Cut you a piece of sweet potato pie and don't forget to put the fried tripe and the ox tails and ribs on low...
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The South Comes To L.A.
view_and_review20 August 2020
It's clear that this movie is rife with symbolism. The question is: what did it all mean? As for me, I don't know.

A man named Harry (Danny Glover) whisks into town and it upsets the balance of the house he visited. He stopped by, presumably, to visit and his brief visit stretched into a long term stay. During that time he seemed to have a bad influence on everybody. Was he temptation? Was he the devil? Was he everything bad about back home (the South)? What was his goal, what was his motivation? Who knows. The movie started, some things happened, and the movie ended. That's what I got out of it all.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed