12:01 (TV Movie 1993) Poster

(1993 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
54 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Unforgettable Unknown Little Gem
claudio_carvalho27 January 2018
The HR clerk Barry Thomas (Jonathan Silverman) works in the office of a power plant with his best friend Howard Richter (Jeremy Piven) and has a crush on the scientist Lisa Fredericks (Helen Slater). One day, he wakes-up late and heads to the office. On the lunch time, he has a contact with Lisa at the restaurant and by the end of the day, Barry and Howard witness Lisa being assassinated by hitmen in a van. On the next morning, he wakes-up late and when he see Lisa, he realizes that the day is repeating. Soon he realizes that he is trapped on the same day and is the only person who knows it. What can he do to save Lisa and let life goes on?

"12:01" is an unknown little gem for many viewers and unforgettable for those who has seen it. Released in the same year of the blockbuster "Groundhog Day", the cute "12:01" is more engaging with nice characters and situations. Unfortunatelly this B-movie was only released on VHS in Brazil. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "12:01 - Meia-Noite e Um" ("12:01 - One Minute Past Midnight")

Note: On 08 Feb 2018, I saw this film again on DVD.
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
GroundWHAT Day???
steve83-110 January 2007
Don't let the premise fool you into thinking this is a rehash of Bill Murray's movie - this is a GREAT little story unto itself. It's closer to Office Space & Back to the Future than to Groundhog Day.

With a well-constructed plot & engaging characters, you can ignore the obvious writing & cinematography constraints of working on a TV budget. Watch for the pearls: Jeremy Piven & Marin Landau will sneak through with their organic performances if you're not paying attention. But everyone from the office dominatrix to the wiry assassin are well-developed; I even felt like "Mom" was part of the cast! So what IS the story about? A hard-working downtrodden everyday guy with a little tardiness problem. On the day that he FINALLY works up enough nerve to talk to the office cutie that he's had a crush on for longer than his mother can stand, she gets killed. And he has to watch it happen. ...again. And if he doesn't figure out what to say & do, he'll have to keep watching it. But the key is to figure out who ELSE is watching her, and why his interest in her has caused our hero to wake up Tuesday after Tuesday after Tuesday...

12:01 is definitely worth watching again, and again, and again, and...
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good movie. Not available via iTunes.
trey-yancy-572-76354726 January 2018
This is a clever movie with a sense of fun, well-written and well-acted. I wish I could own a digital copy, but it is only available on DVD. My question is what happened to Jonathan Silverman. He is a great actor, very appealing and engaging. He should have made a career in feature films, but in the end all he is known for his Northern Exposure TV series. At least, this is a movie that shows his chops.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The only reason I'm writing this review is because...
TVfan4 December 2004
...out of all the good reviews from people that liked this film, a crummy review was displaying on the main page.

This movie stuck with me, and every time I watch it I enjoy it all the more. As with Groundhog Day, I enjoy watching this movie over and over. But they are two different movies, altogether.

I must say (without spoiling) that the scene in the office where Jonathan Silverman tells Slater how he feels about her is one of the most touching, romantic, well-played scenes I have ever seen.

I thought the underplayed comedy was great and perfect for Silverman's abilities, and as for Slater and her performance, all I can say is: YUMMY!
44 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
No 'Groundhog Day,' But It's Not Bad
ccthemovieman-18 September 2006
This isn't as good as "Groundhog Day," but it's not bad. I compare it to that film because a similar storyline with each day repeating itself. The main difference in this story is that it's a crime story in addition to the romance, and it doesn't have the likable lead characters the much more famous Groundhog Day had. Here, we get Jonathan Silverman, not exactly Bill Murray. Helen Slater, meanwhile, should have terminated her career after Supergirl. The movie also could have used a little better humor.

Despite all these negatives there is something appealing about the film. Maybe it's just the interesting premise that once it hooks you in, has you to stay just so you can see if the hero is going to make everything right. For that, it gets five points but only a point for the rest. Still, if you see it on TV, check it out.
18 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent
KFL4 August 2003
Not a bad movie for simple late-nite entertainment...but don't expect any depth from this one.

12:01 and Groundhog Day both posit a hapless fellow caught in an enternally recurring day. Whereas 12:01 tries to explain the "time bounce" in terms of some pseudo-physical mumbo-jumbo (utterly laughable to anyone who knows anything about the subject), Groundhog Day dispenses with all such explanations, and basically focuses on the effects of the anomaly on the main character.

The quasi-physics lecture is so much nonsense. In both movies, the only aspect of interest is the effect of the (semi-) eternal recurrence on the hero. Groundhog Day is the most optimistic of movies--it tells us that humans are malleable, perfectible, if they're only given enough time, if they're just made to face their own faults, recognize that they depend on others. In contrast, 12:01 is not a particularly bad movie, but it doesn't begin to aspire to the same grand heights. It is a popcorn movie, promptly forgotten. It teaches us no grand truths; it does not inspire, or edify, or enlighten.
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A cute wonderful little known movie
sanctuary-18 January 2002
12:01 is one of those movies that no one ever heard of but if they see it will remember it forever. In the same vein as Groundhog Day but with a much more interesting plot, 12:01 is the story of someone caught in a time bounce who must live the same day over and over and each day see the woman he secretly adores killed before his eyes. Silverman plays the part beautifully from answering his Mothers pointed questions to his impatience to finally get it right. Helen Slater is also wonderful as the love interest killed each day.

The movie moves quickly through the days and provides all sorts of interesting little moments as Barry Thomas tries to stop the bounce while saving his girl.

A beautiful story acted out by excellent acting and directing. I strongly urge you to find it in a video store or tape it off late night TV if you have the chance. Once you have seen it you wont forget it.
54 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
After Midnight
juliankennedy2316 December 2006
12:01: 6 out of 10: As made for television sci-fi films go this is defiantly one of the better ones. The sense of deja-vu one gets from watching it however is not necessarily from the same day repeating plot device but from the invariable comparisons to Groundhog Day.

In my always humble opinion Groundhog Day was one of the best films of the nineties. It told an eternal truth that many of us just repeat the same day over and over again without living any particular day to the max. 12:01 doesn't quite successfully hit upon that theme and so for much of the film it simply goes through the motions.

12:01 stars Helen Slater and Jonathan Silverman. Both actors never quite reached the promise of their early careers but both are certainly competent here. Slater just doesn't quite have the charisma of say a Helen Hunt and Silverman just never quite reaches the comedy of say a Jerry Seinfeld. Nevertheless they are both quite likable in their respective roles.

The story is a more serious sci-fi affair complete with giant science machines and bad guys that wouldn't be out of place in a TJ Hooker episode. With a relatively appealing cast and some nice humor 12:01 makes for a decent timewaster. Just don't be surprised if you feel you have seen it all before.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Ever have one of those days?
TVholic27 November 1999
SPOILER: Barry Thomas is having one. The really bad news is it keeps coming back.

Barry starts out as a likable, well-intentioned goofball marking time in a dead-end job. Underutilized, doing his best but going nowhere fast under the heel of the department head from Hell. A lot of people can empathize when he writes on his calendar: "Get new job or die!" Jonathan Silverman does a good job as Barry, making him sympathetic (maybe a little pathetic, as well) and vulnerable, but his unique circumstances eventually bring out a steely determination born of sheer frustration.

Unlike "Groundhog Day," there's a lucid explanation for why this is happening to Barry and the film revolves around how he tries to "get off the hamster wheel," as he puts it. "Groundhog" seems to offer an almost divine explanation, that all would progress once Bill Murray's character got things right. Barry was trapped in a self-perpetuating science experiment gone awry and he knew early on how to get out of it. Too bad it's easier said than done.

Helen Slater basically reprises the role she played six years earlier in "The Secret of My Success." Attractive, driven, young prodigy, brilliant beyond her years, emotionally cold in the beginning, worshiped from afar by a kind, wisecracking young man who eventually wins her heart and turns her into a giggling schoolgirl.

The plotting is intricate and it's fun to watch how each cycle changes even without Barry's direct intervention. Some things, like the coworker getting splashed with hot coffee, seem unavoidable in the grand scheme.

The editing in the home video edition is exceptionally fluid. Unlike most TV-movies available on tape or laserdisc, it's nearly impossible to remember where the commercial breaks were.

Still, if there were one flaw, it would be that Barry should have waited through one more cycle before breaking out. He'd only gone through four or five repetitions; one more wouldn't have been so bad. Getting out when he did left one of the good guys irrevocably dead.

It's interesting to see how many of this cast went on to NBC comedies. Silverman went on to star in two seasons of "The Single Guy." Paxton Whitehead and Robin Bartlett had recurring roles in "Mad About You." And Helen Slater had a guest role as a pyromaniac on "Caroline In the City," finally playing a role other than harmless ingenue.

One possible in-joke. Lisa confides to Barry that her favorite music is from the Carpenters. Coincidence? Or was this story originally called "Yesterday Once More"?SPOI
37 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mixed feelings
geobear7521 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Most of the movie was actually quite fun. But for me it went a bit sour toward the end. I'm trying not to give TOO much away, so let's just say that I found many of the main character's actions to be extremely self-centered. Usually in one of these repeat-the-day movies, the main character grows by the end of the film. They realize that they have the chance to fix most of what went wrong. This one really doesn't have that. Even by the end of the film, the only two things the main character was interested in were getting the girl and ending the time loop. If the writers just would've reset the day one last time, they could've fixed the things that went wrong (including one actual DEATH) on the last run-through instead of selfishly pushing through. It was disappointing.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Once is Plenty
Vantec9 April 2012
The dead end clerical life of lovable loser Barry Thomas (Jonathan Silverman) literally goes for a loop when an atomic mishap at work traps him in a time bubble. Every morning the alarm clock announces the same Tuesday and every afternoon Barry is forced to witness the murder of Lisa, the brilliant co-worker he adores from a distance. Like other TV movies of its time, this one hedges its bets with the kitchen sink approach of hinging the resolution to both misfortunes on an industrial espionage mystery.

1993's leaner 'Groundhog Day', from which 12:01 borrows much, demonstrates the pitfalls of tripling down. The plot is as credible as Barry's predicament. Helen Slater as the love interest is appealing if slightly bland and confused, and much too trusting of "I'm a time traveller, baby" advances. The bigger problem however is Barry. On the surface a cloying, goofy good guy recognizable from dozens of 90's sitcoms, he expresses the most distress about Lisa's death that he missed the chance to sleep with her. His reaction to the world altering realization of time travel is lame humour and he's frustratingly slow on the uptake. The writers seem to forget only Barry recalls his previous Tuesdays with Lisa. Real coworkers would respond with repulsion and disciplinary action to Barry's approaches later in the movie. The result is a confused, unconvincing mess mixing phony love-at-first-sight platitudes with uncomfortable sexual pursuit. Solid performances from Hollywood stalwarts like Martin Landau go wasted.

12:01 is a very forgettable time waster for those hoping for a return to formulaic 90's TV plots, an exercise in prime-time déjà vu minus the laugh track. Watch Groundhog Day over instead.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I watched it over, and, over, and, over....
bgowland28 September 2002
I put a tape in the video machine one night to record this unknown film called "12:01" - the synopsis in the TV guide seemed interesting. I kept that tape for months, watching it over and over, just to see the subtle changes in each day being lived again. Brilliant.

Everybody seems to rave about how "original" Groundhog Day was/is but I saw "12:01" on UK TV well before Groundhog Day even hit the cinemas over here. "12:01" may have been a low-budget TVM and may have its flaws but the concept of the day after day scenario is just as good.

The sad thing is that I actually logged on tonight to order both "12:01" and Groundhog Day but I can't find a UK supplier of "12:01" and it would be such a shame if it were never seen again.
51 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Day after day
ctomvelu-117 January 2009
Whatever happened to Joanathan Slverman? He made some mildly entertaining movies for cable in the 1990s and then. ... Well, anyhow, here he is in a reasonably decent knockoff of GROUNDHOG DAY, only this one involves murder and a faulty particle accelerator that could spell doom. Silverman plays a mild mannered office worker who falls for a curvy scientist played by Helen Slater. (Get in line, Jonathan.) Problem is, he no sooner meets her when she's shot dead. And he wakes up the next morning to find it's the same day all over again. He tries to save her but fails. On the third day, he starts to get smart. She of course finds it hard to believe they are in a time loop, since she doesn't recall any of the things he does. The movie is actually lighthearted and lively, thanks to Silvermaa and Slater and a script that doesn't take itself too seriously. Jeremy Piven has a supporting role as Silverman's wisecracking office buddy, and Martin Landau plays an obsessed scientist. 12:01 is breezy and easy to take, if a little too much like GROUNDHOG DAY.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Poorly plotted, poorly scripted, poorly acted
derekph-18 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
It's not a bad concept, it could have been pretty good, but – poorly plotted, poorly scripted, poorly acted. The lead is just chanting his lines, the only actor with any believability is the always amazing Jeremy Piven. Too many places where I groaned and thought "Oh no!" Every time he connects with a previous day, you see it coming - the jail scenes, for example. Pathetic. Too predictable, too unimaginative – I mean this guy is so obsessed with the girl - he never considers the other possibilities. If you knew you would be living the same day over and over until you found a way out, wouldn't you look for a way to profit? There's obviously no reason to hurry. Too made-for-TV. It focuses entirely on the love story, never on the philosophical and intellectual implications. A total let-down. Skip it.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A good movie
robricci26 September 2000
This is my my second movie I saw where the day keeps repeating. The first one was a short on Showtime. It was a serious flick. In that one, it was worse; in that movie the same HOUR kept repeating as opposed to the same DAY repeating, not to mention that that flick was NON-comedy. Anyway, I was glad to see that that this film had some comedic elements. I like to find my favorite line in a movie. In this one, it would have to be where his mom calls, and Barry tells his mom "I can't talk right now, mom. The day's repeating" and hangs up. I saw it when it ORIGINALLY came on TV, so I don't remember it much, but I do remember I thought it was 2 hours well spent.

On a side note, I saw Groundhog Day after this movie. Groundhog Day is different enough from this movie so you can watch both and not feel like you're having the day repeat. (sorry, COULDN'T resist).
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Different
korppoolainen7 July 2012
When you write a review you are meant to do just that, review it. So please can people stop writing the synopsis of the movie over and over, that is already done, we don't need to read it re-worded umpteen different times over and over.

This film is good, a little dated, but solid plot and reasonable acting (for the most part) make up for it. I got a hold of it as I thought it was a Sci-fi movie, it sort of is, but probably more comedy than Sci-fi. Still it is a reasonable flick and it is quite light viewing which sometimes can be a welcome break.

Enjoy.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A more scientific and less funny version of Groundhog Day
aLeX-7930 August 2000
I wonder which movie came out first, 12:01 or Groundhog Day? Both were released in the same year - yet 12:01 was made for TV. I've just watched it and it wasn't at all bad for a TV movie. Worth a look - but not if you haven't seem most of the well known movies in your local Blockbuster :-)
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
High Drama for TV FINALLY on DVD
stump6931 December 2006
I can't really express in writing just how extremely happy I am that 12:01 is finally out on DVD. It's been on my wish list since the DVD format was invented. The only copy I had was on the VHS that I had recorded off the air (with commercials (:(( on FOX-TV in 1993 and watched over and over and over, not unlike Barry's day repeating. As others have noted, the always beautiful Helen (Supergirl) Slater positively glows in this film. In the lead role, Jonathan Silverman excels as the discouraged office worker who witnesses his only real love being murdered in broad daylight, then being given the chance to undo it, while being thwarted at every turn.

As a fan of all time-warp stories, I count this as my favorite. Had it been released in the theater, it would have done very well indeed. It is good for all ages to see the the lengths that the hero of the story goes to in his desperate attempt to save the lady that he loves from afar. Ten stars out of ten and two thumbs up from me.

Run, don't walk, to get this exceptional movie while it's available!
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quite entertaining!
putman1316 November 2000
While the plot was nothing original, it had other good aspects to it. It was entertaining the whole way through and was done quite well with a TV budget. Jonathan Silverman did a pretty good job as a leading man in this role. He had humor, yet was a believable business man.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Here we go loopty loop
Bernie444417 April 2021
This is a made-for-TV movie with all the earmarks of Hallmark. It is not cheesy, just low budget with actors that cross over between television and movies. Who can forget Martin Landau in Space: 1999 (1975) ?

See the original story in the book "Before...12:01...and After" by Richard Allen Lupoff (Author), George Barr (Illustrator) ISBN-13: 978-1878252234

You know the story before it starts. Time loop stories have been presented long before this and many after. However, if you missed this one you have missed a rather good presentation with a time loop story that doesn't try to be too cutesy or too heavy.

Slob and sluff off Barry Thomas (Jonathan Silverman), finds himself the victim of time loop technology that is gone awry. At first, he finds this quite annoying. Soon he realizes he has a second chance to save the life of the one that he loves from afar, Lisa Fredericks (Helen Slater.)

The film is noticeably short; so, will he find time to grow a social consciousness get close to the girl find and fix the problem and so forth? Or is he destined to repeat his slovenly ways over the same day forever and ever and ever?
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wonderful sleigh ride in the spirit of Moebius
Loichtfoier27 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Here we have a very entertaining romance that isn't really SciFi. In itself, of course, because it does not yet occur in reality, but it is a form of "time travel" that is also really possible. Because here no epochal journey is staged, but the Moebius causality. In which a temporal sequence is repeatedly "rewound" to a starting point. Some years ago it was confirmed in an experiment at the 'Russian Academy of Sciences' that this form of temporal alteration is possible. Which also does not include necessarily the whole universe, but can be limited to a solar system. Even only on a planet in it or a limited surface there.

There are many humorous interludes in this SciFi movie, a romance and much crime. I have to admit that I would not have left the Moebius loop so quickly if I had realized how I could finish them. Apart from the fact that you live a lot longer, you could learn a lot from many moments that are always recreated.

By the way, I have to say that I like the original track better than the German sync.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Barry Thomas isn't having a good day!
TruPretender16 July 2006
For a slow-paced, and mild-mannered man named Barry Thomas, Tuesday morning was just another day with the same old people, being unpleasant and disgusting. He attends the same job, with the same drags and hacks. His boss is a real wench, his best friend won't give him a break, and the woman he has fallen in love, has no idea he exists. But today, Tuesday, he will make a difference. Whether he knows it or not, he will be the key player in the next four days. His first time to speak to his crush, Dr. Lisa Fredricks, goes from kinky, to array. He can't manage to sit down at his desk, without his best pal playing a harsh prank. Next thing he knows, his job is on the line. Things get much more difficult when he watches the beautiful Lisa, suffer, and die from a slew of shots from a gun! He is estranged and torn, so he drinks himself to sleep, but not before he shocks himself whilst touching his lamp....as lightening strikes... Alas, the next morning begins, and there is no mention of Lisa Fredricks death on the news, or in the office, of which he is late for work...again. His boss is saying the same old nagging, his friend has the same pranks in line, and as soon as he can adjust to this madness, there, walking by, is Dr. Lisa Fredricks. The day has started over...and a time bounce has interfered the world.

This film was such a wonderful effort from FOX back in 1993, and I only pity the network for producing less-than worthy decisions more so today. It has a firm, catchy theatrical feel to it, that appeals to it's audience. It sets itself up with an intense introduction and a nice opening title sequence that prepares the rest of the film. It's subject matter, and executional tactics are very fair, and not overdone. They don't show any blood and guts, nor do they invade the script with vile language. Not that it would contain any, being a film made for television. What's more, it captures the exact tensity and tension as an action sci-fi thriller made for a summer blockbuster audience. All the good moments are well represented. Perhaps it would have faired well in a theatrical run...it seemed to do so as it was.

The cast is terrific, and as such, they're easily lovable. Jonathan Silverman is one heck of a good guy in this picture, and he wins our hearts early on, with his adorable personality and his "nice guys finish last" approach. He has an effective puppy love for Helen Slater as the leading lady. Silverman is so hansom and determined to reach his destination. You just want to cheer for him, and your jaw drops as certain obstacles get in his way. Helen Slater as always, gives one of her many articulate performances. She is not so vulnerable as she looks, and she is not easily persuaded to any single belief. Her stronger moments do lay in her character when she is torn between what she thinks is real, and what she wants to believe. Need I say anything more than the radiation of light that appears when her name is mentioned? Slater and Silverman are so cute together, and you just want to take them both and hug 'em tight! The rest of the cast is fun. Jeremy Piven is a frolicked fun co-star who puts his comedic timing to good use as the side-kick friend with a desk full of pranks. Robin Bartlett is above the funny line as the nagging boss who steps out from the expected line and creates diversion and delays. Martin Landau...well, what's not to love about the guy? He's good in whatever he does!

"12:01" is a real winner. It's not too much, but it's more than enough to please any type of crowd.
19 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Highly enjoyable despite its flaws.
koesan-2014425 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
No spoilers in the review. They occur in the discussion that follows.

I love this movie. Vaguely recall watching it back in the 90s, and just this week, thoroughly enjoyed watching it again.

My rating is a seven because those that I would rate eight to ten would be movies such as Galaxy Quest, Aliens, 12 Angry Men (1957) and To Sir With Love, just to name a few. While this is a lovely movie, when judged purely on its own merits I cannot consider it worthy of anything higher.

The pace is far more leisurely than most current movies of this type, which actually I consider a positive rather negative aspect of this movie. There is also a quality that I can only describe as being a 'niceness' that seems so very absent from most modern movies, films and television shows.

It was great to see well-known faces from the movies and television shows that I have watched throughout the years, and they all give good performances, even though the script does them no favours in all but a few scenes. Unusual for a movie of this type, there actually are a few brilliant moments of dialogue, where the scriptwriters truly excel themselves, but the majority is beyond even the most gifted of actors to make sparkle.

Ultimately, this movie stands the test of time. If you have seen it, then it is well worth a revisit, if you not, then you are in for a treat, especially if you enjoy positively oriented movies based on the premise of time travel.

End of Review.

Discussing the glaring lack of morality in 12:01.

Spoilers Ahead.

Being a made for television movie, I doubt that anyone was at all concerned about possible plot holes, which is fair enough. Once we accept the idea that a time loop, sorry time bounce, can exist, then it does not require much further suspension of disbelief to accept that the characters are going to do some idiotic things. However, I think it is disappointing when scriptwriters let supposedly good characters demonstrate a clear lack of morality. Which brings me to one of the main issues I have with this movie, the Denk Factor, if you will.

Dr. Robert Denk (Nicolas Surovy) is first presented in a negative light. He is seen as being in conflict with Dr. Lisa Fredericks (Helen Slater) one of the main sympathetic roles, he engages in what at first glance appear to be nefarious activities, and even worse the man not only smokes but keeps trying to get Lisa to take up the habit too. Oh the horror of it all! However, not all is, as it seems, because later we discover that he is not an antagonist, but rather someone who is very much on the side of the angels.

When Lisa is murdered multiple times, most of us are not concerned because we know that the whole day is going to start again anyway. I would hope that no one was at all would have feared for the Groundhog, the who drove angrily over the cliff, in a movie whose concept may well have been stolen from this one (if that is true, then all the more reason to love this movie for making that one possible).

It is slightly different perhaps, when Barry Thomas' (Jonathan Silverman) best friend Howard (Jeremy Priven) is murdered. Lisa is still alive, and as Barry is still hell-bent on closing that time bounce, there is a slight chance that Howard might well stay dead. Only slight, because who would have the nerve to kill off the comic sidekick? Right? Right.

Unfortunately, this is not the case for all-round nice guy Richard - yes, I know, he smokes, get over it. In his quest for justice, he is murdered, which both Barry and Lisa are informed of via a news report on the radio. We never see Barry's reaction, only Lisa's, which arguably appears to be a minor shock at best.

Being the stand-up guy that Barry obviously is, he must now let things go for at least one more cycle, so that Richard can be saved. Of course, Lisa will correctly pressure him to do so, seeing as she is just as morally upstanding as is Barry. Yes? Err...no. Sorry crusader Richard, your death is 100% final.

Now, what would the danger be if Barry goes for another cycle? My guess would be zero. We see that every cycle he becomes better at navigating the day, leading to success with Lisa, both in saving her from being murdered and in his romantic pursuit of her. In all fairness, winning her heart only having to start all over again, could be emotionally traumatic I suppose, but seeing as he actually seems to cope rather well with the various deaths that occur, I doubt it is all that rough on him. Besides, we are talking about the death of a decent man. Surely, that would warrant one more trip around the clock, even if you have start all over again to win the supposed love of your life.

It is not rocket science. For the next turn, first Barry has to win over Lisa again, something he is by now well accomplished at doing. Then, bring Richard into the circle, a very easy task as evidenced by Barry's chat with him in the car during a previous time bounce. Next, keep Dr. Thadius Moxley (Martin Landau) busy allowing for Lisa and Richard to disable the accelerator, possibly by simply removing a fragile part, damaging it, and then putting it back. As for proving Thadius' maleficence, that will still not be difficult. All that needs to happen, is Richard tells the police he has a tip-off that there is a plan to murder him in the underground carpark (Barry and Lisa can give him the information gleaned from the news alert). The perpetrators can now be caught in the act. Getting them to turn state's evidence against Thadius, in return for a plea deal, would be no more than a stroll in the park.

Where is the danger here? No death is permanent and continued bouncing will not end the world. Come on Barry! You only have to suck it up one more time! Okay, maybe two or three more times, seeing, as you do seem to have a gift for messing things up. Think Barry, think, you can save the man's life! In fact, you could even preserve Thadius, then we would get to see him face justice, along with his henchmen.

Which raises another minor issue for me. What happened to the henchmen? It would seem that they are off the hook. No one knows their identities, and it is doubtful that Thadius would have their names on record. They murder Richard and just drive off into the sunset. This speaks for me to the scriptwriters' lack of concern regarding plot holes and/or morality. I know, I know. People die, people get murdered, and criminals escape justice. This is only a movie. But in this case this is preventable, making the behaviour of the characters with whom we are supposed to identify, selfish and irresponsible at best, morally repugnant at worst.

For me, one of the hallmarks of a great movie is it makes us care deeply about the characters, emotionally investing in them, and not only the major ones but also some of the secondary ones too. Truly talented writers can even make this happen with the antagonist, as is the case with Dexter. But if we are to do so, then they must appear to us as being ultimately good at heart. Ignoring Richard's death does great harm to that perception.

Imagine if we saw Barry slap a young child across the face simply for the fun it of it that would not sit well with the man we consider him to be. How much worse then, to see him ignore the death of a good man, a death that he can actually do something about. We do not see him agonize over this, nor do we see him debate it with Lisa, either because the scriptwriters know they cannot justify it, or simply because they do not care.

Yes Lisa, looks like you are on to a winner there. Barry, now an unemployed and apparently directionless soul and yourself, a highly driven, highly respected scientist of exceptional intelligence.

I give it six months.

Okay. A year at most.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
thumbs up
mattkratz18 December 2000
Try to imagine a combination of Back to the Future and Groundhog Day, and you've got 12:01

This was a decent scifi flick, and I found it highly enjoyable. It was a great combination of scifi, fantasy, romance, and humor. Jonathan Silverman and Helen Slater were both well cast, and if you rent this, you will not be disappointed.

*** out of ****
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fun film that is at the top of it's B-grade class
matris123 March 2021
The good: Interesting enough premise with the time loop. It doesn't try to science it's way to an explanation for what's happening - but that serves the movie well, as it doesn't need to. And I just like watching the dude from weekend at bernies do his 'dumb but not an idiot' schtick. He nails it. The bad: Some cringe dialogue, shoddy sets and average directing. Meh, it's what you'd expect. Should you watch it? If you like rom-com time-loop movies then you'll enjoy this one. It's a simple, sweet and fun ride that doesn't overstay its welcome. A pleasant surprise.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed