Benefit of the Doubt (1993) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Another great Amy Irving performance
blanche-227 August 2005
How many times have I watched something for a period of time before realizing that I'm looking at Amy Irving? This film was no exception. The woman is a chameleon, and though she certainly has been recognized for her work, I think she's underrated.

The plot of this film is mildly interesting - a man convicted of murdering his wife makes parole and looks up his daughter, who helped put him away. His daughter begins to doubt her testimony.

It would have been more intriguing to keep the plot on that level, to have the audience unsure throughout the film. Unfortunately, the plot disintegrates past a certain point and becomes a chase film, albeit through some magnificent scenery.

Donald Sutherland is very good in what has become a familiar role for him. But Amy makes the movie.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mom! Grandpa's gone Nuts!
sol121821 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** The film "Benefit of a Doubt" is not all that bad if you just watch it for it's unintentional comedy that by far eclipse everything else in it. We see convicted murderer Frank Braswell, Donald Sutherland, released from prison-for good behavior- after serving 22 years for murdering his wife, Patricia Tallman. As we soon learn the reason Frank was convicted in the first place was his at the time 12 year old daughter Karen's, Amy Irving, eye witness testimony.

Now a free man the first thing that Frank does is shoot right down to Cottonwood Arz. where Karen and her 12 year old son Pete, Rider Strong, lives. With Karen wanting to have nothing to do with him Frank makes himself more then available to both her and Pete by hanging around the house and trying to make himself useful. This strange and threatening behavior on Frank's part has Karen go to the local Sheriff Calhoun, Graham Green, to see what he can do-which is nothing-to keep her overbearing father out of both her hair and property.

A things start to settle down a bit in the Braswell house with Frank finally being accepted, because of his folksy charm, by both Karen and Pete his true and sinister motives start to come to the surface. It's when Frank finds out that Karen's live-in boyfriend Dan, Chris McDonlad, is going to propose marriage to her that Frank's dark side starts to show. And it's that dark and murderous side that takes control of Frank for the rest of the movie!

The crazed and maniacal performance put on by Donald Southerland-as Frank Braswell-is so down right bizarre and stupefying that it has to be seen to be believed! With his eyeballs popping out of his skull and sneering like the cat that just ate the canary Southerland creates one of the most laughable and outrageous villains in motion picture history. Even Amy Irving as Karen, as good an actress as she is, has trouble keeping a straight face when she's confronted by her severely mentally unbalanced dad in her scenes with him in the film. You soon start to wonder just who was on the parole board that deemed Frank fit to be allowed to live in a civilized society? The Three Stooges? Since even when he was supposed to be normal, early in the movie, Frank showed obvious signs of mental instability that even a freshman collage psychology student could have easily picked up!

***SPOILERS*** We as well as Karen are made to think by Frank opening up his troubled and tortured heart, as well as big mouth, that all that he was accused of and convicted for was a plot hatched by the local D.A Gideon Lee, Theodore Bikel, to frame him. This line of BS on Frank's part also for a time convinced his daughter Karen, who's testimony put him behind bars, that she-being 12 year old and very impressionable-was brainwashed by D.A Lee to finger her dad in her moms murder. Even though Frank told her that momma, being dead drunk at the time, fell down a flight of stairs and broke her neck when she missed kicking him in his vital organs and lost her balance! The truth of what Frank did as it later came out, in Karen's repressed memory, was far worse then even what she D.A Lee and Frank's good friend Sharrif Calhoun, who always maintained that Frank was innocent, could have imagined or dreamed up in their wildest and darkest fantasies!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Is Donald Sutherland A Nice Guy Here?
boblipton5 November 2022
Donald Sutherland is paroled from prison after 22 years. He was sent there for killing his wife, on the evidence of his daughter, Amy Irving. Now he wants to go home, repair the misunderstanding with her -- for he calmly insists that he did not do it -- and help take care of his grandson. After a while, he succeeds..... and then, of course, the story begins.

It's certainly a well cast movie, with Theodore Bikel and Graham Greene, and there's some startling photography of Glen Canyon in Utah. But it's another of the many, many movies that Sutherland made in this period, in which he played older men who you couldn't tell if they were nice guys or murderous creeps until, almost invariably, they turned out to be the latter. I grew tired of the trope and the casting early on, and a quarter of a century later, I see nothing here to change my mind.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good movie
tankrat8 March 2006
Although I read Irving's name in the opening credit, I sat there wondering why the actress looks so familiar. Guess I am used to seeing her with red/brunette hair. Then it finally hit me. As for the acting, both Amy and Donald are such great performers.

I recommend seeing this movie at least once, just like any other movie featuring Sutherland. Kiefer gets the talent from his dad without doubt. I never get tired of seeing either one of them on screen.

Although Donald Sutherland is already 70 he still makes movies. I just think it shows how dedicated this man is to what he does best.

I never even heard of the movie before seeing it tonight on Lifetime, but I am glad I tuned in.

I never saw a lot of Amy Irving movies, except for this one, Yentl and Carrie, but after seeing her in this move and the great job she did, I might just watch more of her films.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
As average as it gets
PeterJackson6 March 2001
I saw this film quite a while ago and really don't remember much of the story, which says quite something. I think it was about a father (Sutherland) who threatens his daughter and it was supposed to be a thriller. Sutherland has played a lot of these characters, but it's a shame he always ends up in ordinary, unremarkable films such as this one. It's not good, it's not bad, it's as mediocre as it gets. 5/10
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Did Donald Sutherland spend 22 years in prison for a murder he didn't do? Well, he thinks so.
cgvsluis22 November 2022
Donald Sutherland, Graham Greene, Christopher McDonald and Amy Irving all star in this odd little thriller that starts with Donald Sutherland's character Frank being released from prison after 22 years served for murdering his wife. It was his young daughter Karen's eye witness testimony that convinced the jury to convict him, but Frank is still maintaining his innocence. Frank maintains that his wife had been drinking and that they argued and she fell down the stairs. Now all Frank wants to do is help his daughter who has grown and become a single mom, waitressing to take care of her son Pete in the topless bar in their Arizona town.

At first Karen is terrified that her father Frank is in town, but he slowly wins her over to his innocence and things are going great until Frank discovers that her boyfriend Dan is about to propose.

Some great scenery in this dessert thriller including a great walk through a beautiful slot canyon and a gorgeous boat ride with a great rock backdrop.

Creepy story that might have been better with the original "did he or did he not" kill his wife left a mystery.

Probably not a recommendation from me unless you just really love Donald Sutherland...because he does creepy so very well!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
better than some think
alannasser8 December 2011
Contemporary thrillers tend to get relatively poor reviews. These films are held to what I think is an unreasonably high standard. Admittedly, a genuinely good thriller is very hard to find these days. It's about the writing mainly. The story counts a lot, as does the suitability of the actors to this genre. It seems that the glorification of multimillion dollar production values, meaning mainly special effects, has become more important to the industry than good writing and characterizations. For whatever reason, movies like The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (original), Charley Varick, and The Getaway (the original) are a thing of the past. (Then again, there's the very good The Lincoln Lawyer.)

Nowadays, all one can expect is the more or less artful use of derivative material. Standards, therefore, should change. Don't expect another Charley Varick. Benefit of the Doubt should satisfy those looking for a reasonably plausible story, well executed tension and of course a first rate villain. This movie delivers on all those fronts. Sure, characters sometimes behave unrealistically, but realism and plausibility are inessential to thrillers. Recall Hitchcock's accurate denigration of "the plausibles", i.e. those who undermine a thriller because of implausible elements. - Donald Sutherland gives us a masterfully characterized bad guy, yet another testimony to this fine actor's beautifully honed thespian chops. The movie did for me what an acceptable thriller should do: keep me interested and provide some genuine suspense. This film is nothing more and nothing less than a better than good enough popcorn movie.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A mediocre film with an excellent performance by Irving
theowl63-122 July 2005
I have to say that although the story itself was quite mediocre, casting Amy Irving as the daughter was a brilliant move. Irving was practically unrecognisable as the woman who - many years ago - identified her father as the murderer of her mother.

Irving is relaxed, uninhibited & - again - almost unrecognisable in her role as Karen Braswell. Karen has straight, bleached blond hair & drives a pick-up. Her role blew me away when I first saw this film. After "Carrie," "The Fury," etc... I was so used to seeing Irving as curly-haired, cautious, & retrospective. Karen Braswell was brashy, kinda trashy, blond & sure of herself - a role that actors literally kill for.

If you are a fan of acting, I highly recommend seeing this film JUST for Amy Irving's performance. She is AMAZING-!!!
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another "Creepy Grandpa" performance by Donald Sutherland ....
merklekranz9 April 2012
"Benefit of the Doubt" features another "Creepy Grandpa" performance by Donald Sutherland, not unlike his character in "Panic". Sutherland is very good in both films, and is surrounded by excellent supporting actors, William H. Macy in "Panic", and Amy Irving and Graham Greene in "Benefit of the Doubt". Another plus is the beautiful desert setting, with magnificent red rock formations. Although the story is rather straightforward, the entertainment value is high. Grandfather is released from prison, and seeks relationship with estranged Daughter who helped convict him. Theodore Bikel's performance, as the district attorney is noteworthy also. Recommended. - MERK
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
On the other hand, consider this . . .
judithw1006 July 2004
Likewise for me, it's been a while since I've seen this movie, however, I remember it distinctly because of its stars.

I would recommend it for the following reason. If you have visited the area of Page, Arizona, and Lake Powell it's quite a kick to see this movie placed in that locale. Marvelous chases through the mysterious sandstone passages and on the water. Sometimes the location can be as much of a drawing point as the plot and actors. I've seen many otherwise mediocre things that have been filmed in a particular city or other location that I'm familiar with. London is among my favorites.

Interesting twists of plot and getting three great names like Amy Irving, Donald Sutherland and Graham Greene is quite a coup. It's good viewing for a chilly night with nothing better to do.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Average Drama/Thriller Featuring Donald Sutherland and Amy Irving...
Jack_Rabbit_Slims917 December 2007
This 1993 drama/thriller 'Benefit of the Doubt' stars Donald Sutherland and Amy Irving. Sutherland delivers a strong performance (as does Irving) in a rather "straight to video" quality film.

Amy Irving plays a character very unlike her other performances (such as Carrie, The Fury or Anastasia). For one thing she doesn't have her trademark curly hair but is a straight blonde, she plays Karen an Arizona single mom who works in an adult bar and smokes cigarettes. She has daddy issues, 22 years ago her father Frank (Sutherland) was arrested and placed into prison with the help of Karen after attacking his wife and killing her.

Frank is released and Karen is hysterical when she first finds out her son Pete (Rider Strong) has had a harmless encounter with her father. Karen tells her son to promise her not to see him again but Frank finds ways trying to enter her life again and seems harmless doing it. What Karen doesn't know is if what she saw that night 22 years ago actually happened and if she can trust her father again, a man she help stay in prison for such a long time.

One word can describe Amy in this film, and that is 'HOT', she is incredibly sexy and has a racy scene with her on-screen boyfriend Dan (Christopher McDonald), Sutherland is 'good' in his role. I watched this not expecting much and is good, just good. It wasn't incredibly well made but it passes for a good midday movie or if you are suffering from incredible boredom.

6/10.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed