Monolith (1993) Poster

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Had potential, needed more money
udar5524 April 2013
Detectives Tucker (Bill Paxton) and Flynn (Lindsay Frost) individually stumble upon an out-of-this-world case when they both spot a deranged woman chasing down a young boy with her car and then shooting him dead. Things get messy when the Department of Historical Research boss Villano (John Hurt) shows up and takes the woman away (according to the screenplay, he has a higher security rating than the President) from police chief Mac (Lou Gossett, Jr.). Naturally, two curious and rule breaking detectives won't be having any of this and begin to investigate. But the bigger question is will these two cantankerous cops get along?

Folks seem to peg this as an X-FILES ripoff, but that is hard to swallow because it was filming before that show debuted. It is more LETHAL WEAPON with aliens. Director John Eyres and screenwriter Stephen Lister had some marginal direct-to-video success with PROJECT: SHADOWCHASER so Shapiro-Glickenhaus maybe wanted a piece of that. It is nice seeing Paxton getting a film to carry on his own at this time (he previous did with THE VAGRANT), but the budget just isn't there for this one. Introvision handled the FX and some of them are really rough. It is a shame because I could totally get behind a "LETHAL WEAPON with aliens" film (well, I guess I have THE HIDDEN, which this closely resembles). John Hurt appears to have only done a day or two on this as his scenes in the last half have him isolated in shots (even including his major role in the finale).
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solidly paced and gibberishly amusing genre hybrid
Vomitron_G29 February 2012
Very likely John Eyres' most ambitious movie to date. A sci-fi/action/horror/thriller hybrid populated with good folks like Bill Paxton, John Hurt, Louis Gosset Jr., gorgeous B-vamp Musetta Vander and Lindsay Frost (who somewhat comes across as the wisecracking tough blonde acting equivalent of Yancy Butler). A secret government agency has been fooling around with an alien entity. Of course, the thing gets loose and starts to run amok in the city. Well, "running" isn't exactly the right word, since it's more like some form of alien energy that possesses the bodies of humans (that eventually do all the running). It's up to Paxton, Frost & Gosset to figure out what is loose in their city and try to stop it. The plot kind of looses itself along the way, not really knowing where to aim things and eventually not bothering to explain itself anymore. The film ends ridiculously, but before that we do get to see some nifty alien set designs. The SFX are pretty decent at times. For fans of Jack Sholder's "The Hidden" (1987), this might be another amusing watch (though Sholder's film is much tighter & better).
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If you love B movies/cult movies you will like it
bnotej23 December 2018
Mix"leathal weapon" and a Roger Corman movie and you have an idea what you are in for.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A great movie for getting other things done around the house.
katpbennett29 January 2002
The reference to Starsky & Hutch by another viewer is brilliant. This movie has no story, but, instead, seems to have been pieced together with bits and pieces pulled from Hollywood's vast supply of garbage cans. Bill Paxton does his usual out-of-control-but-I'm-really-hurtin'-inside schtick. Lindsay Frost's hair stays miraculously manageable, despite her being blown into a pool, shot at on a high-rise terrace, and (why do they subject us to this schlock?) diving into sewage. Both actors serve as the other's straight-man to hackneyed one-liners that are as predictable as the victims. Just who or what this alien with eyeballs that shoot fireballs is... or wants... is never explained, nor do we have any idea what the goon scientists have been doing with/at it all these years. I paid 20 cents for the video of this film on the streets of Seoul. I think I was ripped off.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Monolith? What Monolith?
jaded_viewer9 October 2003
I tend to cut SF more slack than other genres, simply because there is so much more setup work to be done in establishing a believable reality in which the story takes place. It is also my favorite genre. That said, this movie was one of the worst I've seen (I've seen a lot and own over 1000), which was very surprising considering the star power among the cast. Every, and I mean every, scene was stereotypical of some previous movie (cop buddy, action, etc.) done countless times before. And these worn out scenes strung together do not a plot make.

I kept dully pawing the remote in a futile search for some way to lower the frickin movie music volume somehow. It was just relentless! The "smoky sax", the "distorted guitar", the "ominous strings", etc. Someone got their hands on the latest 1993 synth and was wearing it out - and me too. It was often louder than the dialog, telegraphing the "mood" of every boring scene, removing even the possibility of anything unexpected happening in this dog.

An what's up with the name of the movie "Monolith"? I was expecting some large structure ala 2001 to appear at some point. No one even mentioned the word. I don't get it.

I'd rather watch the space saga Albert Brooks was editing in "Modern Romance".
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
4 stars, for trying....
anywheretrev28 November 2018
As fledgling film maker myself, I think a lot of people don't understand just how damn hard it to make a movie. But yeah, it could have been better. I think the overall story was ok and yeah I'm sure more money would have helped. Some of the 'green screen' scenes are well...I can do better in my lounge room with my equipment and a laptop these days but remember this is from 1993 and things were a lot different then. I think without the actors they somehow got into this it would have been ever worse, they obviously thought it was worth working on but I wonder how much they got paid?....anyway 4 stars, for trying while it probably only really deserves maybe 2....
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Mess....
MCal2722 May 2009
This film really caught me off guard. IT had a close to A list cast, looked great on the video box when I rented it (Circa 1994 I think) started off with promise but rapidly became a mess.... It sorta has the feel of an unfinished and un-post produced mainstream scifi action flick.

Terrible editing and f/x. Uninspired dialogue and generic plot. What the hell was Paxton and Hurt doing in this? Even Gossett jnr was a pull around this time.. Did the director have some juicy info on them all to get them to work on this dross? Thankfully for him Gossett shows some good judgement (watch and it'll make sense)

I see the same director did Project Shadowchaser, A video staple of rentals in the uk during the early 90's. That had Martin Kove and the Android to hold it together. Here the stars just seem to be trying to battle thru to the end and forget they were involved lol
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Who can i sue for the waste of time?
denieuwehoorspelers4 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Every so often i have the opportunity to see a movie which isn't highly rated. Monolith (1993) was rated 4.3 at IMDb. This score is a lot higher than it really deserves. As a sci-fi fan, i don't care to much if a plot or props and such are unconvincing. Even the acting isn't a real issue for me. This film had a good plot (even if it is a bit stale) and the acting wasn't bad. So why the low score? Well, there are several things in this movie which destroy the immersion i'd like to get from a sci-fi movie. I'll give three examples. In the beginning of the movie, a 'deranged' woman tries to kill a young boy. She chases the boy in a car while the boy is running away. According to the sounds of the engine of the car, she's driving high speed and the car is moving really fast. Yet the boy, on foot, not really very fast, manages to keep ahead of the chasing car, nonetheless (1). He ducks into an alley and the car chases behind him. You can see the boy running in the ally with the car in the background. (The car isn't moving at all). The camera switches into the car and it's moving very fast (2). At the end of the movie the main characters jump from the departing flying saucer which flies at the top of the skyscrapers. Their drop only lasts about a second (3). The movie has lots of things like the three examples i've mentioned which made the movie an utter disappointment to me. Perhaps i've been spoiled during the years but if your wise, skip this movie and save yourself time for more pleasurable things to watch.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
As if
exctidal11 September 2018
There is a concept called suspension of disbelief. There was no suspension.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Spoiler: there is no monolith
idontneedyourjunk10 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
If that's what you want, go watch 2001. This is a bit of Hill Street Blues, a bit of Moonlighting, a bit of The Thing, and a bit of Lethal Weapon.

This movie tries every trick in the book;
  • Two cops who argue and bicker is a tried and true formula, but they never seem to work up to the romantic twist.
  • A grizzled police captain who's too old for this, but turns out to have a heart of gold.
  • An evil, shady government department who prevent real cops from doing real work.
  • And an alien who seems hellbent of achieving it's nefarious goals.


So two cops who can't stand each other, team up to take down an alien who has escaped a government lab. The alien uses humans as a host and kills anyone it comes into contact with (also shoots fireballs out of it's eyes). Unless you're the protagonist, then being possessed is just like a bad cold, you'll get over it.

The government tries to clean up it's own mess by torturing it's own scientists. That goes as well as expected. When the cops bust into their highly secured base of operations by sweet-talking the security guard, instead of arresting them and burying them in a hole where no-one will ever find them, they let them go. Then somehow track them down to a penthouse apartment the cops have never been to before, and attack them with a minigun from a helicopter. Subtle.

Storming the government building is easy now, as the recaptured alien has pretty much killed everyone and it turns out the whole building is built on top of a crashed alien spaceship, which it seems to successfully escape in, despite being the ship being on fire! Didn't see that coming.

Starring:

Stan Yale - the bum of bums is back (last seen with Paxton in Terminator)

Eddie Allen - Bio-member team #2, his first acting gig was the lead voice in the accidentally hilarious cartoon 'Star Blazers' (1979) (English adaptation of the anime 'Space Battleship Yamato'). Set in the year 2199, Earth is a radiated hellzone, we're at war against an alien race, and we've only got 1 ship left in the spacefleet. Contains hilarity such as; radar works in deep space, spaceships are designed exactly like seaships including a round bilge hull, distance between Pluto and Mars is negligible, Americans still can't bring themselves to use kilometers so they use megameters instead and Mars is covered in ice. Still 20x better than Dragonball Z.

Steve Blackwood - Bio-member team #1, best known for his role of Bart Beiderbecke (Days Of Our Lives, 700+ episodes)

Alex Gaona - little boy at the beginning of the movie, gets possessed by the alien, then shot (age 8). Started as a stuntman at age 6, in 'Hook'. What?! Comes from a line of circus performers, started training at age 2.

Musetta Vander - Russian scientist who seemingly got taught her accent by watching American B-movies from the 80s. Actually a music video dancer, played Sindel in 'Mortal Kombat: Annihilation'.

Louis Gossett Jr. - grizzled police captain, voice of the vortigaunt in HL2 Ep.1, my favorite roles of his are in 'Enermy Mine' and 'Diggstown' (aka Midnight Sting). He will also be in the upcoming Watchmen series.

John Hurt - secret government bad guy, best known for everything except this lucklustre, underdeveloped character. Bakshi's LoTR, 1984, Alien, Harry Potter, Midnight Express, and most importantly, narration on the album 'Seduction of Claude Debussy' by the greatest band in the world, Art Of Noise.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Could have been something great, but...
MasterFantastic24 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I have a confession to make: I like 'B' movies. Some can be very inventive while others are downright terrible. This movie falls somewhere in between the two poles. The plot of Monolith concerns a formless, shapeless alien presence which can transfer between bodies and gives its human hosts the ability of pyrokinesis. It also kills them after a fairly short time, but then again, it's an alien, it's been here before time began, so it really doesn't care much. And it's held by John Hurt who heads up the Department of Historical Research, which is a fancy name for a government black ops organization that tracks aliens.

Enter two cops, played by Bill Paxton and Lindsay Frost. They're at odds with each other from day one, yet form a grudging respect and affection for one another by the end of the flick. They stumble onto the government's plan and after chases, watching their commander (played well by Louis Gossett, Jr.) get killed, and poorly staged fights, they manage to thwart John Hurts' plans and all is well...sort of.

The good thing is director John Eyres manages to build some suspense with this flick in spite of working with a low budget. Paxton and Frost work well together even though the dialog between them--otherwise known as playful banter--is often stultifyingly bad. John Hurt overacts marvelously. His speech at the end ("I've earned this moment, I deserve this moment") should win an Oscar...or a Razzie. There's an amusing scene with a guard at the Department of Historical Research, an excellent good-cop/bad cop scene (very well edited, IMHO), and the music is surprisingly effective.

The downsides to this film begin with the title. With a name like 'Monolith' I was expecting some kind of immense stone structure. We get a spaceship instead. (It's pretty cool, but still...) The dialog also could have been a lot better. A lot. Really, I'm surprised that the leads managed to work up any sympathy for themselves with some of the lines they had to spout and that's due to good acting more than anything else. The explanation for Paxton's wife's death is never fully explored although it can be guessed from the flashbacks, but is underdeveloped. I really think if Eyres had been given a decent budget and the script had been worked on more, it could have been elevated into 'A' status. Sadly, it wasn't, but it's still a very likable film in spite of its deficiencies.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Monobore
1bilbo23 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Monobore.

I bought this expecting a sci fi in the vein of 2001 – was I wrong!

All we had was a stupid story about a female vs male cop with all the clichés lifted out of every cop show ever.

The occasional dip into sci fi consisted of beings who were possessed by some spirit and had the ability to fry people with their eyes (yawn.)

Also just for good measure they included some nasty men-in-black who apparently knew everything and it was a big secret. The only bit of decent acting was John Hurt but his total dialogue was under 5 mins.

Didn't see any monolith.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another John Eyres B-movie with A-movie trappings and no subtlety
BrianThibodeau11 August 2004
Monolith (R) - MCA Universal Home Video: Low-budget hack John Eyres (PROJECT SHADOWCHASER), a director whose penchant for making bubbleheaded B-action scripts seem like high-concept A-list product without the subtext stymies him time after time, lends his flashy, contrived visual style (mostly achieved through lighting and heavy FX work) to this hokey, logic-free sci-fi actioner about two stereotypically mismatched cops (Bill Paxton and Lindsay Frost, bad quip traders to the end) who encounter creepy research guys, assorted walking dead, monster gun battles, and a hefty serving of explosions as they track a body-hopping alien entity to the source of its power. While PROJECT SHADOWCHASER ripped huge chunks from TERMINATOR and DIE HARD, MONOLITH's inspirations seem to come from a plethora of Big Action Flicks, as its alien beastie - bereft of motive or, apparently, physical form - proves little more than a MacGuffin to allow Eyres to show off his remarkable-for-this-budget action and FX sequences, particularly a boffo climax. In between these, however, we get grating, failed attempts at comedy and hero banter so stale a chainsaw couldn't cut it. However, if you go in expecting a full wheel of cheese with the FX wine (in this case a nice Mogen David), then you'll be less disappointed. I give it a 4
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
a waste of time
zacharyjsmith-8682410 February 2024
I watched this movie in the 1990s, and decades later it remains one of the absolute worst movies I have ever seen. It is not even bad in an Ed Wood kind of way. Just bad. Consider yourself warned if you see this review and still watch this abomination. I read a positive review for this movie before watching it and then wondered whether that reviewer had simply imagined a better movie. The dialogue is hackneyed, the story is dumb and somehow bland despite its subject matter, and nothing about the technical work is especially interesting. And the cast includes actors who you might have seen in decent movies, so I blame the script.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Monolith
diamondldy695 June 2010
Well being that I actually got to be on the set of this movie for a time, while it was being filmed in my home town.. I have to say it was an excellent adventure. The time it takes to do each scene and the work that goes into it is time consuming and to be honest very fun. That said, Bill Paxton and Lindsy Frost were very nice and they treated me like a part of the crew while I was there observing.. I even got to help out with setting up some things for the movie... I was not credited for what I did, as it wasn't a whole lot, but to be invited on the set by the director, to learn how things are done to film a scene was the best time in my life.. and it wouldn't be the 1st Movie set I got to visit over the years.... Man how would you feel to have been there for that Opening scene of Lethal Weapon 4? Well I was and it was also an Exhilarating adventure.
5 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why does this feel like "Starksy & Hutch meets the XFiles"?
mrarchiegoodwin3 June 2001
Another good idea poorly executed with pot holes in the story line, improbable action and one dimensional characters. Thoughtful Lindsay Frost (Hutch as a woman) and hard case Bill Paxton (Starsky as a man) stumble onto a zany murder (pretty, vulnerable and distraught, young Russian scientist tries to run down and then succeeds in discharging a firearm into a little boy). Evil Fed agent John Hurt takes custody of the murderer from police Captain Lou Gossett. Shortly thereafter, havoc ensues as discreet portions of Los Angeles are terrorized by the evil of the Monolith (the term is not used in the film so one assumes that Monolith refers to the evil or its source). Starsky & Hutch pursue the invincible evil being--continuing to shoot at it even though they discover early on that it is invulnerable (but everyone in the movie seems to shoot at it as well--to no avail). John Hurt is 100% bad--including his acting. Bill Paxton has greasy dark hair. Lindsay Frost has really skinny jeans for a cop. Lou Gossett and the Squad Room could be recycled into another movie--any other movie. Perhaps this was originally made for TV and commercial breaks were integral to the plot.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed