Death Wish: The Face of Death (1994) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
103 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"I don't need anything, but YOU need a bath"
Jonny_Numb4 April 2005
The beginning of this final installment of the long-running "Death Wish" series is shaky with inappropriate humor (even the title comes off as a tasteless pun, as a central character is disfigured by having her face bashed into a mirror) and a lot of mobster-movie clichés (the henchmen to Michael Parks' villain are howling stereotypes), writer-director Allan Goldstein transforms "Death Wish 5" into a surprisingly entertaining little crime thriller. Though frequently riddled with inept moments (the mobsters unload round after round into walls after their target has jumped out of sight) and plot holes (how is Kersey tracking the bad guys, and since when did he become an explosives expert?), the film is the most well-developed of the series in terms of character, plot, and pacing. I've never seen Charles Bronson more convincingly expressive than he is here, and Michael Parks ("Kill Bill, Volume 2") is utterly reptilian in his loathsomeness. While the plot is essentially a repeat of the previous films, it contains a confident gloss that lifts it out of exploitation and closer to a mainstream film--it isn't entirely successful, but rooting for Bronson never gets old.
59 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
No matter who you are… don't mess with Paul Kersey.
lost-in-limbo27 January 2007
After years in L.A., Paul Kersey is back in New York with his new fashion-based designer fiancée Olivia Regent and along with her young daughter Chelsea. Kersey has put away his old habits, until Olivia's ex-husband Tommy O'Shea (who happens to be mob figure) uses her business to run an illegal money laundry scheme and tries at every optometry of scary her from testifying against him in court. They go one step to far when they disfigure and then later on kill Olivia. By law Chelsea is to live with her father. This tips Kersey's world up side down and vengeance mode comes kicking back in.

What a crying shame. I'm shocked to see the user rating for this "Death Wish" instalment to be so low. Making it by far the weakest of the series. I don't agree, but hey you can't have it all your own way, right. Anyhow, this was the filth and final "Death Wish" to date and it was actually the first one I ever saw. Maybe that's why I seem to cut it a bit more slack then say number four.

So, it's been going on for twenty years and Charles Bronson (who was around 70 at time) is still around looking to quite fit and rather animated. Definitely more so than his two previous efforts. Back to form with his dry, ice-cool persona and showing some feeling along the way. What I like about this outing (other than being a improvement over "Death Wish 4") is that it seems to go back to the dark underbelly and cruel vibe (maybe more so) that worked in the earlier forays. Kersey is up against more upper-class foes, than the usual street pests. At heart is goes back to the basic, heavy-handed revenge yarn, where the detailed situations are harrowing and the violence is simply cold-blooded. He might not want to return the favour (as firstly he lets the cop do their job), but his finally forced back into his beloved side-trade, as it's in the blood and the loved ones are taken away from him… again. Once you start, there is no going back… even when the police know his secret. The way he subtly toys around with the guilty criminals to get them rather anxious, waiting for their turn to be mowed down. Only adds to that ominously nasty touch that waits and the dark humour has real snappiness to it here. The deaths scenes are at times wickedly inventive (well it beats going up to someone and just shooting them) and rapid stunt work is exceptionally pulled off with such thrilling poise. Oh and how can I forget about the gratuitous slow motion? Some times it works and other times your thinking… "Oh why?". Anyhow you gotta love it on this occasion!

As director (and writer) Allan Goldstein stylishly tailored it on a much larger scale that seemed to pay dividends with its competently showy set pieces and crisp pacing. There's always something there to hold your interest. In all, there's no denying it's by the numbers and the predictable plot has a fair share of clichés grounding it. Although it goes out there to delve a little deeper into the material (a highly witty and concise script: "Idiots with guns, make me nervous".) and truly making you feel for the characters. The hammy bad guys are typically portrayed as slimy, ruthless tyrants that deserve what they get. You'll sure be cheering on Kersey here, after you cop a taste of the lively performances of Michael Parks (who's tremendously scummy as Tommy O'Shea) and Robert Joy (makes light work as the paranoid nutter Freddie 'Flakes'). Lesley-Anne Down's presence simply glows and is credibly good as Olivia Regent. Giving able support are Saul Rubinek, Kenneth Welsh and Miguel Sandoval. The technical side of the production is soundly staged. The special effects are put to good use and come off well. What is nailed down is a traditionally sounding music score that likes too flutter about with loud echoing cues and the standard camera-work sufficiently frames every shot with nice scope.

By me saying it shares some common ground with the original films. I guess you'll be hoping for something rough around the edges and some exploitation to fit right in. Too bad, as that isn't going to happen. Those looking for the obligatory rape scene too (which appears in basically all four), forget it. This one is going for the mainstream pool. Even the ending has that cop-out feel about it with what has gone all before it.

For all your troubles it's nothing more than a glossed up, blunt action/crime vehicle for Bronson, which manages to mix the good and not-so-good aspects of the series. Only fans should bother.
20 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I didn't think it would be this easy..Bang Bang..Neither did I!
sol-kay7 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** The fifth last and most vicious and violent of all the "Death Wish" movies based on the sadistic and brutal scenes in the film, even though the body count in "Death Wish V" seemed to be the lowest of all the previous sequels with the exception of the original "Death Wish" back in 1974.

Paul Kersey, Charles Bronson, now thanks to the Withness Protection Program is living as an non-violent and law-abiding citizen in New York City, Paul is a professor of architecture at a local university. With his life back to normal, no more shooting of criminals, and having a classy and beautiful lady-friend Olivia Regent, Lesley-Anne Down, who has a cute and adorable daughter Chelsea, Erica Lancaster, things couldn't be better but then "They" came on the scene. What "They" did to Paul's future wife and to his and her friends, including little Chelsea, made Paul turn into the crime fighter and personal avenger that he tried to put behind him. In the end "They'll" never be the same, or in one piece, again after the outraged and infuriated Paul Kersey does "His Thing" or "Job" on them.

"They" are a Westie-like organized mobster gang headed by Paul's lover Olivia's former husband and little Chelsea's father Tommy O'Shea, Michael Parks. Tommy is a borderline psycho who loves to hurt and torture people that he doesn't like or who don't obey him as fast as he want's them too. Getting his hands on the garment industry in NYC Tommy has a stranglehold on Olivia who has a line of clothes thats produced from a business that she owns there.

The O'Shea mob starts to put the screws on Olivia's business and those working for her. The local D. A Tony Hoyle, Saul Rubinek, gets a number of workers in the garment center to agree to testify against O'Shea and his mob. Unknown to D. A Hoyle there's a member of his staff who's tipping off O'Shea to who's to testify and has the O'Shea mob murder them before he, D. A Hoyle, can provide them with police protection. One of those who's at first viciously mutilated and later murdered by the O'Shea Mob is non other then Olivia,this brings the wild animal out of the peaceful and kind Paul Kersey.

Charles Bronson's Paul Kersey takes on organized crime in "Death Wish 5" unlike the mostly unorganized street thugs and criminals that he took on in the previous four "Death Wish" films. Again like Kersey did in the earlier movies he does the bad guys in, and finishes them off, in the most spectacular ways that he can devise.

Even though he was 73 at the time in 1994 Charles Bronson is very believable as the avenging vigilante Paul Kersey knocking off the entire O'Shea Mob. Kersey does his unpleasant and bloody job not only with bullets but with cyanide-laced pastries exploding soccer balls and clothes making and knitting machinery.

Tommy O'Shea, as well as his gang, gets his comeuppances by being dropped, by Paul, into a boiling vat of acid and made to look a lot slimmer and 150 ponds lighter. Not realizing that their no match at all for the angry and rampaging Kersey the O'Shea mob tried to trap him, by kidnapping and holding hostage Chelsea, at the plant and do him in. Kersey was on to them from the start and in the end it was he who was the hunter and they, the O'Shea Mob, who were the hunted with the results, in this deadly cat-and-mouse game, being a forgone and bloody conclusion for them not Paul Kersey.
22 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A sad farewell for Paul Kersey
Maziun15 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*SPOILERS After watching "Death wish 5" I was really sad . How you could turn great and thought provoking original into a mindless franchise – with each next sequel more and more mindless, cheesy and empty ? By greed of course . The story of Paul Kersey didn't really needed a sequel. It was a great stand alone story. I could live with "Death wish" becoming a franchise , if it had at least some quality and ambition. This was not the case here. The sequels fall into cheap B-movie category and give a bad name to the famous original.

"Death wish 5" was obviously made for money since Bronson's career was pretty much dead at the end of the 80's . His name became associated with cheap and bad action movies made by Cannon pictures , which were full of cheese and violence. "DW 5" wasn't made by Cannon group (which bankrupted) , but unfortunately stays on the same low level as previous movies .

There are one good thing I can say about this movie . It's not so dreadfully boring as the forth one , so it's not the worst in the franchise. Also the movie makers were wise enough that Bronson is too old for action hero and came out with plausible methods how he could defeat his enemies.

This time Paul Kersey (under different alias , of course) fights not with street punks , but with mob. Well , at least one gangster . Once again his in relationship which isn't one bit believable and once again bad things will happen to those he cares for. At this point he's probably the most unlucky person in the world . I mean seriously 5 revenge movies in a row ?! Allan Goldstein is the director and writer of this one. As a writer he created a story that almost becomes a parody of itself – gangster who likes to dress up like a woman and has problems with dandruff , exploding ball, poisoned pancakes , powerful gangster who rules the fashion world (LOL) , district attorney who is surprised that mob is eavesdropping him. As a director he tries to impress the audience with violence and hardly anything more . Also the way he directs shootouts is terrible – it's hard to find more blind gangsters than here. I mean seriously – look at the ambush in Kersey's house. I didn't know that gangsters have such bad aim that very old Bronson can easily run along the whole house and they aren't able to hit him ! "DW 5" also offers some bad acting . Bronson gives another "just give me the money already" performance and it's obvious he doesn't really wants to be in this movie. The little girl was incredibly annoying , just like the growling gangster near the end of the movie . The rest of actors isn't better either.

When Bronson kills the main villain at the end and starts throwing bad one-liners you know that the franchise hit the bottom. From movie asking important questions about justice , law , good and evil to the trashiest and cheapest dumb entertainment – the "Death wish" franchise has missed completely the point of original movie.

Watch the original . Avoid the sequels . I give it 1/10.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Once again , Bronson/Kersey blows away baddies with lots of explicit ,gory and grisly violence
ma-cortes16 August 2016
Extremely violent follow-up to the successful 1974 movie based on the characters written by Brian Garfield , whose novel the picture is based on . Last entry in the original five film series in which Kersey takes the law on his own hands , searching for vengeance against mobsters when his girlfriend is victimized again . The five-times-weary urban vigilant hits gangsters , this time , hard . Death Wish : The face of death¨(1994) that would be the last and it was then not made for about another seven years , being starred by with Leslie Anne Down , Michael Parks , Chuck Shamata , Saul Rubinek and Miguel Sandoval . Sequel to successful crime thriller that created the Vigilante genre with Bronson as the main star as architect Paul Kersey (wooding acting by Bronson who looks bored and tired with this rehash material) turned the one-man vigilante when his sweetheart , a clothing manufacturer (Leslie Anne Down) , has her business threatened , being attacked by mobsters , one of whom turns out to be her sadistic ex (Michael Parks) and a hired killer (Robert Joy) hitting her on a mirror .

This fifth entry with excessive violence concerns about Paul Kersey , an ageing architect who becomes again into vigilante and wiping out the band of mobsters . The main amusement results to be to guess the kinds of deaths that Bronson executes against the villains , as he carries out retribution and vendetta . This 5º outing from the novel ¨Death wish¨ by Brian Garfield in which an architect taking the law into his own revengeful hands and acting as judge , jury and executioner . It contains suspense, noisy action-packed , intrigue , thrills and lots of violence . Initial excitement at the welter of violence son palls into boredom , only intermittently relieved by the preposterousness . Mediocre screenplay manages a couple of nice twists , but it's too formulary to pursue the ambiguities it reveals . Here filmmaker emphasising a hostile , nightmare terrain and relying his virtually sympathies with the confused , violent Paul Kersey . Bronson with his usual stoic acting displays efficiently his weapons such as ¨Harry the Dirty¨ and killing mercilessly nasties . Screenwriter re-wrote the entire script while filming but Charles Bronson constantly had problems with the dialog . It's certainly thrilling , though the morality may be questionable , even in this time, as the spectators were clearly on the Kersey-Bronson's side . Furthermore , it benefits from some good support actors , as here appears a nice secondary cast , such as : Chuck Shamata , Michael Parks , Saul Rubinek , Miguel Sandoval , Kenneth Welsh , among others . It packs a screeching musical score composed, orchestrated and performed by Terry Plumeri . The studio, Cannon : Yoram Globus, Menahem and Damián Lee produced this one in enough budget . The motion picture was poorly directed by Allan Goldstein (2001 a space travesty , When Justice Fails , Home team , Jungle boy , Chain dance , Private lessons) .

The original film ¨Death wish¨ had great commercial hit , it was followed by various extremely violent sequels to this successful 1974 movie , that's , of course , the best from the series , being starred by Hope Lange , Stuart Margolin , William Redfield and Jeff Goldblum . This first big hit motion picture was middling directed by Michael Winner such as the successive films with his main star, Charles Bronson , usually giving wooden performance . In the mid-70 Winner , in need to other hit smashes attempted with the sequels , but both , Bronson and Winner , looked increasingly passionless and mechanical in the later years of their partnership in this cheap as well as worn-out final series . The worst sequels in which Kersey goes on to torture robbers , all of them inferior and the violence could be deemed exaggerated , they are the followings : ¨Death wish II¨ by Michael Winner with Jill Ireland , Anthony Franciosa , JD Cannon and Vincent Gardenia , ¨Death Wish III¨ by Winner with Ed Lauter , Martin Balsam , Gavan O'Herlihy and Deborah Raffin . However , Michael Winner showed no interest in directing Death Wish 4 because he had heard that Charles Bronson had a terrible experience filming Death Wish III (1985). Following ¨Death Wish 4 : The crackdown¨(1987) with Kay Lenz , John P Ryan , Perry López , Soon-Teck-Oh directed by J.Lee Thompson . In addition , an intended but unfilmed sixth movie was also to have a subtitle: 'Death Wish 6: The New Vigilante'.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Man does this guy have bad luck...
darin-wissbaum9 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Paul Kersey had his first wife raped and murdered, his daughter rapped then killed in the second film in the series. His maid was then killed in part II before which she was rapped. Now in this one his soon to be wife is threatened my the mob. Trouble follows Paul wherever he goes. Of course there would not be any Death Wish films if the screen-writers came up with an original idea. When Death Wish came out in the early 70's it was original, and Paul Kersey was seen as a hero for fighting back against the street scum that killed his wife and rapped his daughter. Charles Bronson played the part well and you shared his rage and pain for what happened to his family. Since the first movie it just sunk into endless boring violence with no point at all. Paul Kersey just morphed from victim to the very scum he set out to kill in the first movie. What a sad end to a wonderful film Carrier for Bronson. Part 5 just stinks and is rotten to the core. Not just in film making but acting as well.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
better than part 4
movieman_kev19 June 2005
Charles Bronsan is back for the last time playing Paul Kersey. This outing he's fighting the Mafiso backed Unions after his fiancé gets disfigured and later killed. He also must save his fiancé's daughter who is also the daughter of the head Union boss. Contary to public perception, this isn't the worst of the series (that dubious honor would go to part 4). No this film is a step up from the previous one, and while it's not as great as part 3 was, it's still a pretty good watch. This was also Bronson's last theatrical film and I shed a tear when I heard of the great actors passing. He will be missed.

My Grade: B-

Eye Candy: Sharolyn Sparrow gets topless, as do some extras.
19 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dire
frmarcus-18 March 2012
Charles Bronson here doesn't act, just coasts - even more than usual. Perhas we can't blame him - because the script is so poor, and the supporting actors so mediocre at best, with not a few laughably bad. The film's full of mobster clichés, to the extent that you wonder whether this is self-parody. It isn't - it's just dire; 'camp' in a kind of trashy way. By this forth sequel the franchise appears totally to have run out of steam, such that every barrel's been scraped to supply the content. You imagine that even the cast knew it, collected their cheques and ran...

I quite enjoyed some of the earlier films: this is so poor it's unworthy.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gimmie 5 more
offyerswod30 August 2006
people like jonathan dabell are the reason the action genre is dead.

acid baths are all the rage you fool...but I'm sure your much happy watching your CGI Vin diesel crap !!... Your type are the kind who moan about tom & jerry cartoon characters smoking ... and strive to see them delete history to appease god knows who !!!

at the end of the day ... Death wish 5 ...Bronson is about 74 and hasn't lost his knack of knocking off the villains ...sum good graphic violence and typically vile villains ...( played to perfection by Michael parks) they don't make stuff like this anymore ...becoz u idiots prefare Borefests like " Miami vice " and weak soft core crap like the transporter

check this one out its Better than number 4 !!
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A presentable "Face".
gridoon27 June 2002
Well, it's easy to be scornful of this movie, after all it is "Part V" of a disreputable series, and Charles Bronson is so old to be playing in an action picture it's almost funny, but the fact remains that it's actually competently made, and possibly the most mean-spirited, sadistic "Death Wish" chapter of them all. Predictable and ultra-violent, but still better than parts "II" or "III". (**)
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
ANOTHER BRONSON CLASSIC! BRING ON DEATH WISH 6!
jts097 August 2002
Every Death Wish movie is a classic. They continue to get higher body counts and plenty of action. I never get sick of watching Bronson blow away these scumbags. All of Bronson's movies are great and I think he is by far the greatest actor that ever lived. My favorite films of Bronson have to be the later ones. Kinjite, Death Wish 1-5, Murphy's Law etc. Bronson had big budgets to work with and plenty of people to blow away. The ending of each Death Wish just gets better and better. Blowing people away with Rocket Launcher's, Cannon's, Bazooka's, throwing villain's into Acid. How can any action fan not love this stuff? My favorite Death Wish film is part 4. What a great plot and plenty of Bronson action but Part 5 is also very good and the Villian played by Parks does a really great job. I saw this film in a packed theater and fans were clapping and cheering for each Bronson kill, It was great! The DVD was even better. Death Wish 5 had a good plot and plenty of bad guys for Bronson to play with. I would really like to see Bronson make at least on more Death Wish movie. In part 5 his closing line was "Call me if you ever need any help." Well, Mr. Bronson today's action heroes are a joke and we could use your help to mop up these clowns. Guys like Vin Disel, Arnold, Stallone, Van Dam, Siegal to name a few. Even at your age these punks can't hold a candle to your acting or screen presence. I hope to see you again on the silver screen soon. That is my "Wish"
36 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I'm coming for you O'Shea
lastliberal19 January 2008
At least Paul Kersey (Charles Bronson) has justification for responding. He tried the law, and they failed. It's the basic revenge scenario, but without the senseless killing in Death Wish IV.

At least this movie spent the first half setting up the reasons for Kersey's revenge and gave his efforts at having the law do their job.

He was also original in his dispatches with powdered canolies, recycling, and some dermatology assistance.

Criminals don't come any sleazier than Michael Parks (Kill Bill, Grindhouse). he got a needed bath.

Good ending to the series.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
73 and still kicking ass
nolan-0915411 August 2020
After working my way through all 5 death wishes I was surprised by how much I liked the finale. Jammed with action and more gruesome violence and maybe the first villian who truly deserves the Paul Kearsey treatment. Although this movie was more competently made it didn't have the Cannon Golan-Globus charm of 2 and 3 but much more enjoyable than 4! Also a perfect sendoff shot for Bronson.

"If you need me, give me a call"
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Marvelously Mean Finale to the Series
Sanguinaire3 January 2004
Gangsters have bullied and murdered a woman. Now they had better watch out, because her fiancée is none other than Paul Kersey – and it's time for Mr. Bronson to dispense some more swift justice!

While this entry in the Death Wish series doesn't have the highest body count (see part 3 for that) and isn't the most grim and gritty (see part 2), it is the most sadistic. You see, in previous films Bronson got his wrathful business done with his trusty sidearm – but we get some variation in this one. Here he breaks out a marvelous assortment of deadly amusements such as the exploding soccer ball and poisoned pasta mentioned in other reviews – all seen in graphic detail as they work their murderous magic. Add to that the stress on facial disfigurement and scenes involving torture by steam press, plastic wrapping machine, and radial saw – and you have a new and wonderfully vicious formula for more Death Wish mayhem.

This is not the best in the series, but Bronson's presence alone gives it distinction, and it manages to make the most of the obviously very limited budget. If you're a fan of the series like me, you'll enjoy it in all its unpleasant, uncompromising glory.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not Much Of A Swan Song
Theo Robertson1 March 2013
Charles Bronson is one of the great icons of late 20th Century cinema . Born Charles Buchinsky in 1921 he first started appearing in films in uncredited walk on roles in the early 1950s . By the late 1960s we became a well known face in supporting roles and as the 1970s dawned was a film star in his own right . Something strange happened during the cultural change in this period of American film making known as " The New Hollywood " . Actors no longer needed pretty boy good looks to be a star , audiences demanded a rugged machismo etched on an actors face and in no other decade except the 1970s would you have an unlikely actor like Bronson become a major star ? DEATH WISH saw him play Paul Kersey , a mild mannered family man who after his wife is murdered and his daughter raped turns in to a one man vigilante army . It was a highly influential film and it was the role of Kersey that cemented his legend . How fitting then that DEATH WISH V was his last theatrical cinema release

The downside is that DEATH WISH V isn't much of a thriller in its own right never mind as a sequel . No one with any sanity can claim DEATH WISH 3 is a good film or a credible thriller but as deranged entertainment whose prime function is to entertain its audience it does its job superbly . DEATH WISH V tries to be a sensible revenge thriller but the genie had long been let out of the bottle . By this I mean if you have a vigilante who is dating a middle aged woman young enough to be his daughter that alone is problematic . You perhaps speculate that the makers of this are trying change the formula by having a smaller body count whilst making the deaths of the villains have a bigger impact in their novelty value but this is a gimmick that doesn't work . Having a smaller body count also means it's a much slower paced film that is borderline boring in the first half . As it stands Bronson's last three movies were TV productions in the FAMILY OF COPS franchise and Bronson's career ended not with a well deserved bang but a whimper
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The World's Deadliest Architect!
memery-16 June 2008
This not the best "Death Wish" film, but who can resist seeing Bronson go nuts...especially when he was well into his 70s??!!! The plot of this movie is not unlike something that would appear on Lifetime. A fashionista's abusive, mobster ex-husband starts trouble for her and it's up to the vigilante architect Paul Kersey to help. The film is a little slow and the plot is pretty thin, but the supporting cast isn't too bad. Michael Parks and Robert Joy make very sleazy villains. So much so, the audience can't wait for Bronson to lay down the law on them. Not a fitting end to the "Death Wish" series, but it's nice to see that Bronson was still at it at this late stage in his career.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Paint by numbers Bronson
pmtelefon17 February 2019
"Death Wish V: The Face of Death" only has one problem: It's pretty dumb. I'm a big fan of Charles Bronson. He made several classic movies. However, he did mail it in towards the end of his career. "Dearth Wish V" is one of his weaker efforts. Bronson is given some pretty good dialogue but it's not nearly enough to save this movie. It's just too dumb to take seriously. Because it's Bronson, it's almost watchable.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Let's face it.
sol-21 August 2016
Let's face it: if you have made it this far in the 'Death Wish' franchise, you are not watching this fourth sequel expecting Oscar worthy dialogue or three dimensional supporting characters. Chances are, the drawing factor is either Charles Bronson's on-screen presence, his creative killing methods, charismatic villains, or a combination of all three, and 'The Face of Death' delightfully has all three elements in spades. Considering his advanced age at the time, Bronson does well in the lead role with a genuine gleam in his eyes when taking out those who have wronged him. From cyanide sprinkled on cannoli, to choking in cling wrap, to a remote control soccer ball (!), Bronson also does his dirty business in highly inventive ways, and to top it off, Michael Parks is electric as the chief antagonist. The basic story admittedly recycles too much from previous entries for its own good with yet another wife/girlfriend attacked, yet another (surrogate) daughter in peril and yet another ineffective police force, but everything essentially works here since the focus is on the violence and the extent of the reign of terror from Parks and his underlings. The film also boasts lots of imaginative female attire with a couple of zany fashion shows in the mix. With some effective point-of-view camera- work in a hospital section, the film additionally has better technical credentials than one might expect given its reputation. Sure, 'The Face of Death' does not take the basic story in any real fresh or new directions, but what worked once before still suffices if one is in the mood.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How ,much worse can it get?
xredgarnetx27 February 2008
A 74 year old and puffy-faced Charles Bronson made his theatrical exit in DW 5, a movie that is so bad that it is hard to classify it as a movie. This time around, Paul Kersey is engaged to a woman (the very dull Lesley-Anne Down)) whose business is being threatened by a mobster (the seemingly perpetually stoned Michael Parks). Only after Parks badly hurts one of her employees, kills a second one and then kills her does Kersey decide to limp into action. By then, two-thirds of the movie has expired and I felt like I had expired as well. Kersey's first kill is not by gun but by poison. What the hell is this? Kersey poisons someone? Anyhow, I was just happy to see Bronsons still working, but watching him and this movie was painful beyond belief. A must-avoid.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
These people, they steal, they murder, they destroy people's lives and they get away with it!
hitchcockthelegend27 December 2015
Ah yes, the Death Wish series of films, each and every one guaranteed to invoke some ire and even hatred from critical circles and film lovers alike. Yet to think that they don't have fans from movie land would be wrong - case in point Death Wish 5: The Face of Death.

Often considered to be the runt of the litter, it's actually better than what some would have you believe. OK! So the formula is the same as usual, Charles Bronson's Paul Kersey will have to take up his vigilante arms once again when someone close to him falls by the wayside. The law is still an ass and the bad guys can literally get away with murder, but they can't get away from crossing the path of Kersey.

It is what it is in that respect, another chance for Bronson to please fans of the series, to attack his role with machismo and a quip on the tongue. Where inventive deaths are conjured with a side order of vigilante relish. There's even strains of film noir in here, with a henchman as a transvestite and another with a dandruff problem that bothers him so. There's even a mannequin factory for added noirish flavours.

The production isn't exactly high end (tongue in cheek folks), and the usual suspension of disbelief is very much required, but for fans of Chuck and the series, then this delivers the goods. Bloodily so. 7/10
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
tired franchise
SnoopyStyle5 December 2016
Paul Kersey (Charles Bronson) is in witness protection working as an architecture professor. He's dating New York fashion designer Olivia Regent (Lesley-Anne Down). The problem is that her gangster ex-husband Tommy O'Shea (Michael Parks) and father of her daughter Chelsea has pushed his way into her garment business. Tommy sends Flakes (Robert Joy) to attack her. Paul goes to DA Brian Hoyle (Saul Rubinek) for help. Police Lt. Vasquez has been trying to put away Tommy for 16 years. Tommy starts killing Olivia's workers who were cooperating with the police and the cops themselves. He kills Olivia and takes custody of Chelsea. Paul has no choice but to take on the mobster his way.

The story is not bad. There are some very good actors. Michael Parks is always a good villain. However, the franchise is tired and old. The grittiness has been replaced with cheesiness. Trying to do high fashion looks silly. The biggest problem may be doing the Toronto for New York bit. It simply devalues the reality of this world. It's also a little repetitive for his girlfriends to always have problems. Charles Bronson does what he does best but there is nothing new left. Also the ending is abrupt as if they ran out of money.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
5 wifes killed by gangsters - What would you do?
mkw-528 March 2006
I have noticed in the previous parts that Charles Bronson's character is himself a total psycho/mentally "ill" person. And that's totally understandable knowing what he's been through. So both the bad and the good guys are real extremes also in their sickness (in these movies). You have to be "freakin'" crazy to fight these crazies. "Fight evil with evil". "If you "have" to fight, you have to fight dirty." "Because war in itself is bad, evil and crazy." (These citings are not from this movie, they're just clichés.) Is there any other way? But compared to the bad guys Bronson's character is also very, very sad and sympathetic. It's sad that some people have to see and experience so much evil in this world. It is a very interesting character and portrait of a time and a frame of mind.

And the bad guys are not as comical as in some other Death Wishes, they are somehow more realistic.

From the start setting of this film some mental professional would suggest that Bronson's character is begging for blood and violence in his life: He has hooked up with some psycho-sadist-mob boss's ex-wife, who has a daughter with the mentioned. But let's not be shrinks. Shrinks (both amateur and pro) seem to be wrong very often, maybe as often as non-shrinks. Maybe it's just because they have fallen in love. And maybe Bronson/Kersey has heard about this only later.

One of the most important questions that these movies rise is: What would YOU do? Would ethics and philosophy of forgiveness be enough, if some person would for example kill some of your loved ones with no reason. Would you think that that person has deserved forgiveness and is worth of that? If that person would be a repeated killer, who has been in jail a couple of times already for his/her former crimes/killings? Would you think of that person as an equal to some person you love, and who you know is trying to be as good person as he/she possibly can? The movie is very well directed, shot, acted. Good editing and music. The atmosphere is whole. Some nice pictures. It's also more sexy than all the other parts combined. This might be one of the 3 best of the 5 Death Wishes, but wouldn't 3 have been enough? Obviously not, because these movies are just a small glimpse of the "vigilante"/revenge-movies genre... Worth seeing.
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Everything You Expect
refinedsugar14 March 2001
Bad Movie? No. Unnecessary Sequel? Yes. Did the world need another Death Wish sequel? Not really.

I suggest you do yourself a favor and just watch the original Death Wish then skip all the sequels except this one. If you follow those instructions you should find Death Wish V mildly satisfying. However if you've already seen the rest of them this one is going to be more of the same. Read that however you want. For those who don't already know the plot throughout the Death Wish series is pretty simple. Paul Kersey is an everyday man who goes vigilante after someone hurts any of his relatives, close friends, heck even distant acquaintances. Such is the same here.

Nothing within Face Of Death really stands out. It is what it is. A mildly passable sequel sporting the number five that will distract you for ninety minutes while you watch Kersey extract revenge on low life scum bags. The aging Bronson is still a treat to watch, but everything about this production is strictly-by-the-numbers. Hardcore Death Wish fans will probably eat it up while others are advised to stick to the original.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A production line of revenge kills
shakercoola23 May 2019
An American action thriller; This fifth installment in the Death Wish film series edges more towards slasher than crime thriller. Architect and former vigilante Paul Kersey battles mobsters as he tries to protect his girlfriend from her mob boss ex-husband, whose daughter is under her care. Charles Bronson cuts a tired figure this time round. Trademark sadistic violence and revenge meted out on cartoonish mob villains runs to a predictable conclusion and no danger of plot twists. Yet, it is competently directed, and Michael Parks raises it a notch with his naturalism style of acting.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed