Fudge (TV Series 1995–1997) Poster

(1995–1997)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Does what the books should have done
n-mo27 July 2008
Judy Blume has been oft-derided for her extremely pessimistic and hyperrealist (sometimes) conceptions of late childhood and early adolescence. Her "Fudge" series suffered from another unforgivable flaw: lack of sympathetic characters (except, perhaps, for Jimmy Fargo and his father). Fudge himself was a total brat; Peter was a self-righteous and disrespectful pomp; Shiela was, even from her own perspective, completely dishonest, pretentious and unconvincing; the Hatchers were overindulgent dupes (and the mother quite possibly a tranq addict).

But the "Fudge" T.V. series turned all that around. Fudge is still an annoying little brother, but he's a witty and well-meaning kid--sure, he busted the antique table, but all he wanted was to wrestle with his brother; and sure, he extorted money to buy his parents an anniversary present, but COME ON! He's a little kid. There are enough cute moments that we get the idea that even Peter, in between bouts of annoyance, is somewhat charmed.

Peter, for his part, is headstrong but less bitter, a vast improvement over the Peter of the books. He even has a generous side--he gave up his precious duck to console his poor plush-monkey-deprived little brother. So does Shiela; she's gone from a completely facetious know-it-all to a girl next door who may be slightly bossy and nerdy yet is also earnest and serious--and appears to nurse some genuine affection for Peter.

And the parents... well, anything could have been an improvement over the books, but at least they appear to exercise some sort of sense now and then, and that is always welcome.

I no longer watch any TV and I only caught an episode here and there, but as TV shows go this one was pretty decent and redeeming, especially contrasted with the downright depressing anti-humanism of the books. Kudos also on having a network show (and a children's show nonetheless!) set in New York City rather than the cultural wasteland that is Southern California. There are definitely worse wastes of your time (c.f., South Park, Buffy the Vampire Slayer). (And thank you for getting rid of the distracting and totally unnecessary additional little sister, "Tootsie."
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lame attempt at a brilliant book series
ellaynrihan114 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I grew up on this book series and now I teach them almost every year. My children love the books...but this show is nothing like the books.

The actors don't seem to be really acting. The only tiny bits you see of any story or plot line were taken directly from the books themselves. The rest of the show is 'artistic license' brought on by people who call themselves writers. Hah!

The plot lines also do not make sense as they do in the books. For instance, Peter receives Dribble at the beginning of Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing. This happens in the first chapter, as it does in the first episode. However, what the story leads up to (and takes an entire book to lead up to) Fudge eating Dribble, is covered in one episode. Just for fun, they also throw in the Yarbys plot line and change Juicy O to Soupy. Forgive the language, but what the actual hell man? Four chapters worth of material from one book in a twenty minute episode? Introducing a poor little turtle just to have him eaten at the end of the episode? Who does that? Even HBO realized it takes more than one hour to build in chapters worth of books. ABC didn't get that memo.

Some of the more comedic and charming details are glazed over. Remember Fudge putting stamps on the Yarby's suitcase? Putting mashed potatoes on the wall and wearing peas on his head in Hamburger Heaven? The incident in the shoe store? The toddle bike commercial? His incessant spelling and singing? Swallowing his teeth after trying to fly off the monkey bars? "Eat it or wear it?" The character that was built by Judy Blume is no longer that child. Considering the instances above, Fudge, who looks up to and obviously adores his older brother, has been turned into a brat and terror beyond the series. The subtle charms of this character have been changed into random immaturity that do not suit a child at this age. This child resembles that of a wild child, not the charismatic, charming and precocious child Judy Blume created in her novels.

The parents in this story are not what Judy Blume displayed in her novels either. Patient, loving parents that also want to further their child's potential are not displayed in this series either. Since when does any adult in the series say "I hope you aren't jumping on the couch" and then watch their four year old blanatly continue to disobey them and laugh, rather than take action? Warren and Annie are not the same parents from the books I know and love.

To be honest, none of the characters seem to even hit close to the bar of what Judy Blume's vision was. It just falls flat. What was a series of loving (though flawed) people who learned from their mistakes, just turned into a lame attempt at comedy.

In conclusion, as a lover of this series and the author Judy Blume, I will tell this to any fan who wants to watch this lame attempt at a children's tv show adaptation of a book: Don't waste your time. For someone who spent over ten years excited to finally view this show, I can say I have never been more disappointed. There are so many more book adaptations out there that can quench your thirst for an adaptation. Fudge is definitely not one of them.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed