American Buffalo (1996) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
47 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"It's not worth a nickel"
tim-764-29185612 August 2012
A film starring Dustin Hoffman, plus the chief super from the Hill Street Blues, from an adapted script by screen writing legend David Mamet, at a pocket-money price? Why hadn't I heard of it, what was wrong with it.

Nothing - except it's more a filmed play than a film, with almost all the talky dialogue taking place in a dusty old New York junk shop. Dustin Hoffman is superb, mixing a florid torrent of irrelevant comment, swearing and unease that is not a far cry from his brilliant turns in Rain Main and Midnight Cowboy. Dennis Franz, meanwhile is the shop's proprietor and is an almost opposite, a masterclass in understated body language as the rants from Teach (Hoffman) have become like water off a duck's back.

A third character, black youth Sean Nelson is the dog's body of the outfit and has his own agendas to deal with. The U.S coin of the title is one that might be worth a lot of money, or is it? Having sold it for more than they thought it worth, do they steal it back, just in case it's worth thousands?

Mamet's dialogue crackles with a crisp reality - Teach swears like a trooper, with F and C swear words jumbled up along with everything else. He's harmless, you conclude, if not obviously emotionally damaged. Donny, (Franz) says as much and as little as most shopkeepers say; only when it's needed to get a deal done; to clarify a point.

It undoubtedly would have had more impact and urgency within the confines of a set in an actual theatre, but on DVD it's OK. The shop, at least looks like a proper shop with a plethora of junk, the clutter adding to the feeling of messed up lives, somehow.

Sadly, this won't appeal to everyone. There's no real action to speak of, no pretty women to break up the squalid male-ness and like Teach's dialogue, the story goes round in circles. However, this tale of emerging bitterness and feelings of underachievement is palpable and engaging, if you let it. Personally, I'm glad I chanced upon it.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great script, great acting...
ibuck-25 April 2002
...so why couldn't they find a more imaginative director? Michael Corrente's direction of this would have seemed static and lethargic even if it had been done on the stage, which it practically was. If you're going to do a filmed staging, do a filmed staging. But if you're going to go through the motions of making a film, try to make it the least bit visually interesting. What does this guy have against moving the camera, for chrissake?? It's a shame, really, as Franz and Hoffman are flawless, and really have a handle on the tough delivery of Mamet dialogue. To see how easy it is to make Mamet-speak sound odd and out of place, check out the performance of Pinky in the recent "Heist". Mamet is as difficult to act as Shakespeare, all submerged rhythms and unusual language. American Buffalo is a powerful work, and the performances reflect the power of the text...but all that power crashes to the ground like a 747 with Corrente's static presentation. I'm giving this a 7/10, simply because the script and performances were SO brilliant. If directing were all I was taking into account, it'd be a 3/10. So disappointing.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Acted with some intensity.
RatedVforVinny6 December 2019
Another successful play conversion from a David Mamet play, with Dustin Hoffman replacing Al Pacino in the chief role. Maybe in this case the stage production would have been a superior viewing experience but there is still a lot to enjoy in the cinematic version. Some further strong supporting actors, get to grips with a wordy but engrossing dialog. Not as powerful as 'Glengarry G.R'' but 'cut from the same cloth' and certainly a worthy companion piece.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent if you can take it
halfcolombian18 August 2002
In a way this is almost like a pornmovie, but instead of sex you have talk. The movie is a 90 minute long filmed conversation. But to me the movie is more entertaining than many actionmovies. It's definitely not for all viewers hence the bad overall ratings, but I can still recommend it. The acting is over the top. Hoffman and Franz is a very funny combination. Seldom have I seen someone make so much out of so little. As oppose to other movies the climax isn't in the ending, every scene is equally important. Not as good as Glengarry glen ross though. GGR was both a character study and a good movie. This is "just" an excellent character study, but with these actors it's enough to make it worth watching.
24 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-handled dialogues
khatcher-214 January 2001
Ever since "Twelve Just Men", including such pieces as "Death of a Salesman" (not the Hoffman version which I have not seen, I refer to a version way back in the 60s) or the tremendous "Whatever happened to Baby Jane?" and more recently "Peter's Friends", there has always been a certain appeal to me for theatre pieces converted into celluloid versions – especially if the job is well done. I think we can add "American Buffalo" to this list. May be it does not have the British subtlety for theatre, but at least it gives us an indication of where North American theatre has been going ever since Tennessee Williams or Arthur Miller. With only a cast of three obviously the accent is on interpretive skills; I can't help thinking Dennis Franz, in the rôle of a sleazy junk-shop owner and small-time criminal, gets the better of Dustin Hoffman, who tended to overact the difficult part of a no-good bum-parasite from time to time during the film. The third member of the cast, Sean Nelson, plays his part of an adolescent doing odd jobs around the shop more or less with correctness. Full marks for Michael Corrente's directing, but who really gets my vote is David Mamet whose dialogues (from his own play) are excellent - if one can overlook the (necessary?) use of strong language – and well handled by both Hoffman and Franz.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Talks itself to death.
gridoon22 October 2003
Overly talky and often tedious and annoying (especially at the start), "American Buffalo" seems to be going around in circles. Mamet's dialogue is occasionally amusing (like in the "wrong number" scene), but cannot completely cover up the fact that nothing much happens - by the time the film ends, not one thing has changed in the characters' lives. There are some tense moments and the performances are good, but I can't imagine more than 10% of any given audience enjoying this film. (**)
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A good movie if you're a fan of the stage play
caspian19787 May 2002
Your average movie goer will not enjoy this film. With a small cast of three main characters, the majority of the film takes place in a single room. This alone may explain why the film never took off as the blockbuster it should have been with actors such as Dennis Franz and Dustin Hoffman. The direction of the film could have been much better that it turned out to be. Like other critics have said, the film was shot like it was being acted on stage. This is very true. The film has no unique directing style nor does it have any strong motif to add to the films creative look and style. The acting in the film, on the other hand, is wonderful. Franz and Hoffman are excellent together. With a stronger movie maker in the director's chair, the movie could have been much much better.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Uninspired direction
secretagent_00715 January 2008
I've never seen this play performed except for that time in college when I directed a scene from it. I deliberately avoided this movie at the time so as not to color my direction any particular way. The way I see the play is a couple of old guys sitting around a resale shop talking about stealing a guy's coin collection, sort of fooling themselves into thinking they're even capable of such a thing. My ideal cast would be (undead) Lemmon and Matthau, but it could also work with some very young people who don't know better. The point is, the crime is that distant idea which is captivating, but an impossibility. It's like folks who dream about winning the lottery and imagine what they'd do with those vast riches, but know inside that it'll never happen.

This movie's mistake, in my eyes as a one-time director, is that it almost makes the crime plausible. Don, owner of the shop, and Teach, his talkative buddy, go through the plan of what to do when they get to the guy's house. How do they get inside? Go through a window the guy left open. What if there's no window? There's always something - kick in the door if you have to. Okay, where does the guy keep his coins? In his desk drawer. How do you know? C'mon, they have to be in there. If he's got a safe? Find the combination written down somewhere in the house. What if he didn't write it down? Everybody writes it down! How do we even know he's not home right now? They call the number and are shocked when someone actually answers. But they dialed the wrong number anyway. The long discussions these two have about the plan is a lot like some little kids having a play war in the backyard. No detail of the fantasy is too small and if things don't work out, you can always whip out an imaginary sword and gut your enemy, just like Teach plans to somehow find a safe combination hidden somewhere in a whole house.

This play always worked better as a sad little comedy to me. The movie's director, one Mr. Michael Corrente, has turned it into a real caper movie! That's too easy a choice to make, too on the nose, and it doesn't allow the audience to see the irony of these washed up crooks trying desperately to convince themselves that they've still got what it takes. I never saw these guys as taking the whole thing too seriously as an actual thing that they were going to do. I just see Lemmon and Matthau trying to entertain themselves with the notion that they're going to commit a crime together, like the old days. Maybe Teach thinks it's a real thing, but not Don. Don is just the one who plays along with Teach's wild fantasies. Not in this movie. Here Don is every bit as committed to the theft as Teach, and just as devastated when it looks impossible. I didn't laugh as much at this movie as I did at the play in my mind. This thing is just depressing.

http://www.movieswithmark.com
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If you can't sleep, here's a drug free solution
bernd-436 September 2005
I'm not sure what the appeal of this movie is, but I couldn't find it. It's a really long, barely credible, hardly lucid conversation between three guys on one set.

It doesn't move anywhere, the characters are just totally bizarre, the underlying plot equally so. It's lost on me, definitely a walk out movie.

The one thing that keeps you from walking out is the ever unrealized possibility that it might have some kind of point or meaningful climax, and the fact that, all irritation aside at the banal personalities, they're acted quite reasonably. But you have to brace yourself for endless dialog, wishing on many an occasion that Teach would just shut the %*&* up for a moment.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Marvelous
wignaz21 June 2006
I'm more than surprised that this is a much ignored movie in the internet, underrated maybe?...

I finished seeing it and I was mixed with emotions, with possibilities that could have started at any time in the movie so I watched it again right there.

Marvelous dialogs, I think this is a Mamet and Hoffman thing. But I couldn't find more feedback on the internet about the plot and the outcomes. But be careful because I read some comments that were too much sure about it.

I believe this is what David Mamet's genius is about. And people with a lot of talent putting it in front of you.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring!!!!!
crussell44423 March 2013
After previewing this movie, I can't imagine why Dustin Hoffman allowed it to be distributed. If I were he, I would have paid to keep anyone from seeing it. This is the only movie I have ever walked out of before the end. I wouldn't mind a movie that has little action or special effects, but I do prefer one that has a script. My friend and I both love Hoffman and Franz, but the dialogue was not that good and the movie was going nowhere. After twenty or so minutes of incredibly boring conversation,we looked at each other, stood up, walked and never looked back. I have never regretted that decision; I only wish I had asked for a refund.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A play on celluloid...
Adec14 August 1999
American Buffalo is definitely a curious little film, basically a play committed to celluloid, with only three actors and almost all taking place in the one location. However due to good direction by Michael Corrente, a great dialogue heavy script by David Mamet (based on his play) and a trio of excellent performances it works, and works more or less perfectly.

Dustin Hoffman here is at his peak as a small time crim, while Dennis Franz is excellent as his pawn shop buddy and Sean Nelson is also more than holds his own and is very good as young wannabe scammer. But basically this is Hoffman's show, and he is quite something to see as the explosively tempered, ranting, whining, complaining 'Teach' firing off a hundred words a minute. In fact his performance alone is worth the price of admission...which is good as the crux of the story, while thankfully well told, is admittedly somewhat slight.

American Buffalo is definitely not for everyone, however for those looking for a great, superbly performed drama and don't mind the fact that it relies more on talk than action need look no further that this great slice of entertainment.

One man's opinion. 8.5/10
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pointless, plotless, and typically Mamet
=G=20 August 2001
"American Buffalo" is a pointless dialogue-intensive claustrophobic character-driven drama which take place almost entirely in an inner city junk shop and involves two guys ruminating incessantly about a heist they're about to pull. A typical love it or hate it Mamet screenplay of the ilk of "The Big Kahuna", "Jerry & Tom", or the much better Mamet "Glengarry Glen Ross", "American Buffalo" showcases the talents of Hoffman and Franz and will likely appeal more to those who appreciate acting for acting's sake than the general film-going public.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not Worth a Nickel!
70mm MAN16 March 2001
This movie was beyond disappointment. Well acted story that means nothing. The plot is ridiculous and even what story there is goes absolutely nowhere. It truly isn't worth a nickel, buffalo or otherwise..pun intended!
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A little long in the tooth.
Ysman12 January 1999
Brilliantly acted. Hoffman's performance is reminiscent of his role in Death of a Salesman. Unfortunately, the ending is a let down. I was hoping for more of a shock. Still worth watching if only for Hoffman and Franz and if you love Mamet.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disappointing
Jack-15126 January 1999
Dustin Hoffman and Dennis Franz turn in fine performances and those looking for them to strut their stuff will find some of that stuff in this film, but Hoffman has explored this terrain more effectively and memorably elsewhere. The character Bobby is never fully integrated into the film, and is not well acted. The cinematography is occasionally superb and one has the sense that there is a very good film lurking here somewhere -- but where? I never found it.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You can buy a lot with a nickel these days
helpless_dancer5 February 2004
When two low life dirtbags see an easy score they spent many worrisome hours figuring out how to run the game. So engrossed were they in their greed that they were unable to look at the score with any degree on intelligent planning. Hoffman's character was a particularly odious goof totally unable to consider anything but a speedy, easy job. Crazy film; thumbs up.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Of absolutely no redeeming value
mxsuba2613 February 2020
Watching paint dry or grass grow is more interesting than this watching this film. Just plain dull. A waste of good talent too.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great 3 man cast, but not Mamet's best play.
fisherforrest12 September 2003
Mamet's plays are usually more interesting than this one. Take OLEANNA for example. Here we've got these 2 guys and a black boy, obvious losers from the start, who plan to burgle the house of a customer to retrieve a valuable coin. This was sold to him at what they now consider too low a price. But all they do is talk, and sometimes get a little violent with each other, especially with the black kid who seems to be double crossing them.

What is Mamet's purpose in all this? Is it his idea of a "film noir"? These guys are certainly losers, a prime requirement of that genre, but this play, and the film, is rather tedious despite the good cast work. I am an enthusiastic Mamet fan usually, but this one rather lost me.

Incidentally, the only "buffalo" nickel worth very much is the 1918 minting, with 8 stamped over the 7. In the 1960's it was listing at $160 in "fine" condition.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
line up your antidepressants.
thrback31 March 2020
NOT revealing, just dismal, tho well done, well cast.

don't make plans for AFTER you watch this. you will sit there denumbed.

dustin hoffman certainly can play a heartless loser. there is a talent in that.

reminded me of why i hate chicago.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Acting At It's Best
kirbylee70-599-52617921 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
There are some plays and movies that are not about sitting there for 90 minutes or more just watching something that makes you laugh or tense up due to the action involved. Instead they offer an actor the chance to use the skills they have developed to bring life to a character, good or bad, that makes that character come alive. To watch that isn't necessarily something you watch for pure entertainment. It becomes a combination of that and being pulled into the lives of the characters on screen. Those actors become those characters.

On top of that there are certain writers who can bring forth a story and screenplay (or play) that offers actors the chance to do just that. One of the most exciting of these is David Mamet. In numerous screenplays Mamet has provided actors with the opportunities to show just how great they can be. The language he chooses may offend but it is the language of the characters he is writing about. It's real.

In 1996 two actors performed in a movie based on one of Mamet's hit plays, American BUFFALO. Both of them displayed such amazing jobs of acting that you come to a point where you have a hard time differentiating between what is real, what is acting, and what is a movie that you are watching. Between the written word and the sculpting of the characters both bring life to what could have been boring.

Dennis Franz is Don, the owner of an inner city junk store and part time thief who has just learned of a possible big score. Having resigned himself to the daily grind of running this business he now has a chance to put something away, make a large haul for himself and for the person that tipped him off to the score, Bob (Sean Nelson). Having overheard a conversation at the nearby diner across the street, the two are making plans for this once in a lifetime deal.

Into the pawn shop walks Teach (Dustin Hoffman). Teach is a professional criminal by trade, a small timer who talks big and who thinks he knows it all. Where Don has resigned himself to the daily life he leads, Teach constantly makes plans to be the big man on the block. He recites rules that should apply to all criminals and yet follows none. He might talk about how a smart crook knows not to share information while at the same time pressuring those around him to talk. Such is the case as he pushes Don's buttons trying to find out just what he's planning, what the score is. While punching up how great he is he tells Don that Bob is too young and unskilled to be a part of this score.

Throughout the movie Don is on edge, wondering if they can pull off this burglary or not, wondering who he should trust, being manipulated by the fast talking and ever present Teach. He knows Bob is a young kid but is Teach someone he can actually trust? As the film moves forward the arguments back and forth, the discussions of what to do fill the 88 minutes we're watching with a sense of dread and concern for all involved. They may be crooks but they are also human beings. We watch as they crumble before us and hope that in the end things will turn out all right.

The movie takes place in the junk store from start to finish with only a few moments with the characters stepping outside into the street taking place. It feels claustrophobic and tight matching the wordplay that goes on between the characters. What goes down between these three men in the course of one night makes for some tense moments and some fascinating back and forth dialogue that has you mesmerized from the start.

I remember seeing this years ago when it first came out and thinking how boring it was. But I was younger than and unappreciative of the display of skill that was taking place by the actors on the screen or the dexterity of the written words that Mamet had woven together to create these three characters and their world. Watching it now I wish I would have appreciated it more at the time and now look forward to watching it again.

Recently released on blu-ray from Twilight Time it shows their care in the choices they make to bring to blu. Extras, as are normally the case with Twilight Time, are limited but good choices none the less. An isolated score track, commentary track featuring film historians Julie Kirgo and Nick Redman and the original theatrical trailer are what is offered.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A constrained adaptation of Mamet play, pointless in spite of talented actors.
tigerized6 April 2013
Perhaps my expectations were needlessly high, given the pairing of Hoffman and Franz, and the fact that David Mamet penned the screenplay from his original Broadway play. But after forcing myself to watch the entire production, I had to go online to figure out if I had missed something crucial that might have some redeeming value.

Unfortunately, what I found online only mirrored what I had experienced. This film has very to little to offer beyond non-stop dialog delivered at a machine gun pace, much of which is missed given the speed of its delivery. And there's no let up for the viewer, no moments to pause and reflect on the content. You can't afford to, lest you might miss the significant development that has to be in here somewhere, the one you keep wishing would finally appear.

But the payoff never comes. But it finally just ends, mercifully, allowing to viewer to wonder why they just wasted their time watching this mind numbing display of a very meager plot augmented only by earthy dialog and very little else. Mamet fans might find some redeeming value here, but for the average viewer, there's very little there, there. Given a choice, sorting my sock drawer has more intellectual stimulation.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great, solid acting and brilliant dialogue. A supreme pleasure!
mattymatt4ever24 June 2002
Watching this film on screen and on stage (I imagine) wouldn't be a hell of a lot different. It's still a 3-character film that revolves around the same setting--most of the time. But when you see great acting like this, how can you complain?? Dustin Hoffman is great at whatever he does, and he's perfectly believable as the foul-mouthed Teach. He has some of the greatest lines. My favorite is "Guys like that, I'd like to f**k their wives." He is rude and obnoxious with barely a sympathetic quality, but he's the guy you love to hate. I just recently started watching "NYPD Blue" and just from watching a few episodes, I can say that Dennis Franz is one of the best actors I've ever seen. He deserves to be on the big screen a lot more, because he has abilities as an actor that only few TV actors also possess. He delivers every line and every emotion with such power that your eyes are wide open with amazement every minute he's on screen. Even young actor (I assume he's now in his late teens) Sean Nelson is perfectly cast, blowing me away with a performance I'm sure very few young actors can pull off just as effectively. He only has about 20 or 30 minutes of screen time, yet he's the character you most feel sorry for at times, despite the fact that he lives an unclean life, dealing with thugs and earning his money via dishonest methods. You can just sense that he didn't have any parental leadership, and he wasn't sure what path in life to take, so he took the most easy one--and also the most dangerous one. In a way, the two guys are like his surrogate parents.

I've never seen the play, but when I see the name "David Mamet" under the writing credits, I immediately know that I'm gonna hear some priceless dialogue. I don't know how he does it, but he just has a relentlessly quick wit when it comes to creating dialogue. Like a play, this movie is composed of 80 % dialogue, but the dialogue is so great that I don't really care if there's no exciting visuals. And last but no least, I loved the opening and closing theme song. It just has that grungy quality that perfectly fits the tone of "American Buffalo." If you're a fan of superb acting, this will be a real treat! A real treat!

My score: 8 (out of 10)
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Frustratingly bad
GeorgeC10 January 1999
This film features both Dustin Hoffman and Dennis Franz acting in keeping with their excellent reputations, but to no purpose. The three-man script is gritty, but pointless. As many great scripts as Mamet has written, this one is a dud.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mamet outdoes himself this time
Mr. Pink-103 June 1999
Adaption of Mamet play is even better on screen. Dustin Hoffman gives the best performance of his career as the protagonist Teach. Dennis Franz is equally good in his first leading role as Donnie, owner of an antique shop. One hell of a well acted movie with great cast, great script, great direction, great plot, great music, and great location. What else could a intelligent moviegoer ask for?
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed