Jailbirds (1996) Poster

(1996)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
PROMISING START, BUT THEN.........
J. Steed18 March 1999
This male chauvinist comedy starts promising refreshing, but as the story develops the viewer is confronted with a very trivial love story.

But Detlev Buck knows his metier and this film is far better (made) than the average German 90's comedy. Buck is supported by the very good cinematography of Idziak whose use of colour is excellent. Almost as a rule in 90's German cinema the music is no more than muzak.

Heike Makatsch almost steals the film.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Has okay moments, but the characters and story did not work out too well
Horst_In_Translation30 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Männerpension" is a 90-minute movie from 1996, so this one has its 20th anniversary this year. It is a German production and also in the German language. The director and also the writer is Detlev Buck, one of Germany's most established filmmakers, already at that point back then I guess. Here he worked with Eckhard Theophil who is also not an entire nobody. Theophil also plays a small role, but Buck himself plays even one of the main characters here. He sure is a prolific actor as well and he may even give the best performance in the film. There is no need for him to hide behind the likes of Schweiger, Bäumer or Makatsch. On the contrary. I would say that he is easily better than Bäumer and she never impressed me as an actress. This film here does not change my perception. As for Makatsch, she has okay performances, but she is also not really good in here, just better than Bäumer. Schweiger is okay and has solid chemistry with Buck, but the fact that his character was trying to get together with the really bland Bäumer's character took away a lot from the appeal. The story between Makatsch's and Buck's character was probably more interesting. But the whole thing admittedly felt as if it sacrificed all kinds of realism and authenticity for comedic purposes. Sometimes it worked out and the movie does have fun moments at times, but it's far from enough to let me ignore the major criticism I just mentioned. As with Buck, it is always mostly comedy with occasional dramatic moments. There is even a character that gets killed in here, which is serious, but still it does not take away from the overall lightness. The romance is also one of the film's biggest weaknesses. I am sad that I have to say that it is sometimes as bad as schmaltzy cheesy television films and the superior comedy cannot make up for that. I like Buck as a filmmaker and as an actor and quite enjoyed some of the stuff he has done, but this one here from early in his career may be him still a while away from his best years. I give it a thumbs down. Not recommended.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed