NightScream (TV Movie 1997) Poster

(1997 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
a so called chiller........ .thawed and Luke warm
veronicammartin28 April 2010
This is a very confusing film. Even for afternoon TV it rates poorly.

The story revolves around a girl turning up at a small town and looking remarkably similar to a girl who was murdered the previous year .

The problem for me seems that although the two girls are played by the same actress, the young men in it look remarkably similar too. Which left me feeling like I wasn't sure who was whom.

The actress playing the dead girl's mum is decidedly wooden especially when hearing something that had happened to her daughter that would devastate most mothers.

All in all not one to be re-watched . not even creepy although it was billed as a chiller .Its a chiller decidedly Luke warm.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Meh.
jdollak16 September 2003
While the movie managed to keep my attention for the most part, it still had some big problems. The story had the potential to be decent, except that it got horribly messed up by the weak acting. Even the stars were dragged down by this sloppy dialogue. The highlight of it all- guy goes up to the sheriff, and says "Nice day.... too bad your father isn't alive to see it."
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Terrible
culwin9 September 2001
This is horrible even for a TV movie. I can't believe it took three people to write this movie. I am not familiar with the novel on which this film was based, but it has got to be better than this. I'd rather watch a "Full House" marathon than this stupid movie. I gave it 2 out of 10 stars only because it was made better by commercials.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dumb non-starter
Leofwine_draca10 June 2015
NIGHTSCREAM is one of those insipid made-for-TV movies that seem primarily aimed at the middle aged American housewife who doesn't want too much in the way of sex, violence, or controversy in her TV scheduling. As such it's an entirely insipid affair, a dumb non-starter of a film that suffers from dull plotting and an almost entire lack of emotion and incident in the storyline.

The tale begins as a young woman finds herself in a small town still suffering from the consequences of a horrific murder that took place exactly a year before. It turns out that the murder victim looked EXACTLY the same as this new visitor, and that she's blessed (or cursed) with flashback memories of events building up to the tragic event. It soon transpires that the killer may still be on the loose after all this time.

It's not necessarily a bad set-up but it never goes anywhere and that's what makes this film so frustrating. It's full of bog-standard acting (including from a youthful Casper Van Dien), stereotyped characters, an almost wilful lack of suspense. The supernatural elements are deliberately toned down throughout, leaving this a decidedly lukewarm effort.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Kept on getting worse
rockstarsharks18 May 2005
While Watching this movie you notice right away the cheesy elements of a standard TV movie... though through out the picture the plot changes (if you are bold enough to say this movie has a plot) are by the book and unoriginal... and with every one the movie KEPT GETTING WORSE!

Candace Cameron Bure, famous for her role as DJ Tanner on the hit TV show Full House, is not very convincing as a Possessed twenty something.. trying to avenge the Possesers Death. I believe she is fine actress.... just not in the thriller range.

The Filming was trashy, and like I said the plot stale... though watching it I knew I was in for automatic cheese, I had NO idea how much worse this film could get...

I highly do not recommend this movie... unless cheep Filmaking and poor writing is what you looking for
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring, cliché soap opera acting and ploting. Only good for unintentional laughs!
Bababooe10 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Ok, starts off as a mystery, possible ghost supernatural trance. Then it devolves into a conspiracy, identical lookalike pretending to be a dead person, with lots of fill in plot nonsense, with the worst soap opera acting and plotting.

So, here's the story: 1, Rich woman's new husband kills his wife's daughter, because she didn't want to develop her fathers land, and also kills her boyfriend, to make it look like a murder suicide. The boyfriends body is never found. He may have fallen into the river. Who knows, who cares!

2, The husband then develops the land, and his son from another marriage happens to meet an identical lookalike of the murdered daughter, and convinces this woman that he is the boyfriend and that he need her help to clear his name. So, she goes along with him, and pretends to be possessed by the murdered girl for periods of time and try to get her hands on the girl's diaries that contain evidence of the boyfriend's innocence. Yes, this freaking movie is unbelievable and convoluted. This girl now shows up in town just in time for the 1 year memorial of the dead girl, and everyone ties to act shocked.

3, We have a reporter trying to help the girl figure out what's going on, along with the audience. Main question is, why the hell did anyone even bother making this boring pile of mess? We have a dirtbag sheriff, that may or may not be in on the murders, dumb red herring. And we have Terri Garr as the dead girl's mother. Unbelievably stupid character, and dumb performance. She was great in Young Frankenstein, and had a decent role in the original Star Trek. Here, she's a mess. She's clearly limping, where the camera tries to hide the limping.

4, the girl hallucinates and may or may not be possessed. The whole directing and acting is just plain garbage. The dead girls step-father wants the dead girl's diary because of some incriminating evidence. That's why he got his son to impersonate the dead girl's boyfriend.

This is some serious convoluted nonsense. It could never happen. So, the story is crap. The acting is soap opera level. The only way to enjoy this is if you laugh at it. Tons of laughter if you follow those instructions. The best part is at the end. Not only because the movie ends and you are now free to continue with your life. But, Terri Garr, limps outside, after her husband shot his son dead, and says some of the most ridiculous crap that has ever been utter in world history. She says something like "Now we can he happy".

Another thing. All throughout this movie. Tons of clues are given to fill in the blanks. Cheap little bits of dialogue. For example, when Terri Garr went to the bank safe deposit box with Candace Cameron, they bumped into the bank manager. Garr says "I never liked that guy", next thing we see is the bank manager calling Garr's husband. Also, Garr tells us that the safe deposit box is under her maiden name and that her husband doesn't know about it. And what do you know, the husband shows up to interrupt the safe deposit viewing, in a pretense of inviting them to dinner. Garbage, paint by numbers script. Boring dialogue, and boring acting.

If you approach it as a comedy. The rating may be higher. But as it stands this is a failure. F, 1 star. It is of course not the worst movie ever made. That I have to award to a recent viewing of a Meg Ryan film In The Cut, which was offensive in a lot of ways.

Thank you. Good night.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Shoot me! I beg you!
Jack the Ripper188812 June 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Think you've seen the worst movie in the world? Think again. The person who designed the cover of this box should be accused of false advertising. The cover makes it look like a good, scary horror suspense thriller. But, no. What we have instead is NIGHTSCREAM. A movie that makes a "sweeeoooowww!!" noise every time a credit flashes across the screen. The biggest name in the entire film is probably Casper Van Dien who hardly has a part.

I voted a one for this one only because I couldn't vote any lower. If I could vote something like negative five-thousand, trust me, I would have. So, for now, I'm going to give NIGHTSCREAM 1/2* out of 5 just because it ended.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Deep Dark Mysteries Revealed
whpratt110 November 2006
This was a film I first started to view on TV in 1997 and was unable to see the final conclusion and I discovered it on a DVD. This film starts out with Candace Cameron Bure,(Drew Summers) falling asleep in her car and then winding up in a small town in Oregon. Drew walks into this small town and is identified as a young girl who was murdered a year ago and there is a ceremonial going on for Drew's memory by her father the mayor of this town. This is a spiritual haunting tale about justice being resolved by the past and evil deeds uncovered for those responsible for this young girls horrible death. Denis Arndt, (Roy Ordwell Sr.,) "Sniper",'04, is the father of the murdered girl (Laura) and Teri Garr,(Mrs. Julie Ordwell),"Kill The Man",'99 plays the mother of Laura. This story has many twists and turns and many ghost flashbacks showing foggy scenes with dark images from this dead girls past.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not To Be Confused With Any Cosmetic Called Night's Cream
NoDakTatum29 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The only screaming I experienced during the viewing of this film were the results of my uncontrollable laughter. Drew (Candace Cameron Bure) shows up in a small Oregon coastal town, a town still reeling from a murder-suicide a year earlier. It seems Julie's (Teri Garr) daughter Laura was strangled by her boyfriend Ted, who promptly threw himself off a cliff into a river. Clue Alert! Clue Alert!: his body was never found! Drew begins taking on the personality of the dead Laura, and because the two look exactly alike, Julie spends more time with her. The sad news is that the whole Drew/Laura ghost thing is a scam. Unbunch your panties, the film makers let us in on the secret way too early as well. Drew is in Oregon with Laura's old boyfriend Ted (Casper Van Dien). The couple wants to find Laura's diaries and solve the case themselves, clearing Ted's name. This is an obviously foolproof plan, except Drew begins having visions of Laura for real. Everybody is not who they seem, and Drew and her scrunched up button nose are plunged into a whole sack of peril.

I was never a "Full..." or "Fuller House" fan. It wasn't funny, the cast was terrible, and yet it was on the air forever. Candace Cameron Bure has grown up but she cannot shake the role that made her a star. She still looks thirteen here, and I halfheartedly waited for a 'Dave Coulier as Bullwinkle' cameo to liven things up. Bure annoyingly spends most of the film looking slightly nauseous and telling everyone she's not crazy. Casper Van Dien has too few scenes to be totally terrible, and Teri Garr does her best Teri Garr impression- kinda ditzy, kinda weepy, and kinda disinterested in the film. The film is full of so many "oh, come on" moments, it should be covered in screenwriting classes at university level. Nosseck's direction is terrible. The awful musical score NEVER stops until the end of the film, when a Chris Isaak wannabe croaks a nonsensical ditty about two loves. The film premiered on television, and in the VHS version I saw, the black spaces where commercials were to be put ran a lot longer than a simple fade-out and fade-in, instilling a false hope that the thing was over. Dangling plotlines include the mystery of the sheriff's dad, and exactly how long did Drew rent that car for? "NightScream," an awful title, might take you in with its flashy video cover art and the promises of a scary horror film. Yes, this is horror, but the kind of horror that comes from knowing you are watching a very bad film. Muffle this Scream.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not a very scary movie but an alright movie
Mattswife9714 February 2002
Ok, so this made for television movie wasn't too scary. Then again are most made for television movies scary? No. Even though it wasn't very scary it wasn't a very bad movie. I didn't know who the killers were until the end of the movie. I thought it was corny though how every time she went into a trance she would see the murdered girl and see what happened when she was alive. How predictable is that? I do think Candace Cameron is a very good actress though. I grew up watching Full House. In reality I give this movie a 3 stars out of 5.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
NightScream 1997
wilsonandrewc18 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
In this film Candace Cameron Bure and Teri Garr are mother and daughter. Drew Summers (Cameron Bure) drives from San Francisco, California to a small town in Oregon she has never been to while in a trance. A year ago in this town, Laura Fairgate (Cameron Bure) was murdered. Everyone assumed that Laura's boyfriend, Teddie who went missing the same time as the murder had done it, but Drew started having dream sequences and trances that imply otherwise. Laura's mother, Julie Fairgate-Ordwell (Garr) takes Drew in for shelter. Drew finds out that Laura's stepfather was the murderer and comes out of her trance. In the end of the movie on the way back home, she leaves flowers near Laura's grave.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
* out of 4.
brandonsites198127 September 2002
Young woman (Candace Cameron, Kirk's sister) in a trance drives to a small town where a girl who looks exactly like her was murdered one year ago claiming to be her. She eventually comes out of the trance and returns to her normal self. The murdered girl's parents offer her shelter, but she then begins to have flashbacks to the murder and discovers someone else other then the murdered girl's boyfriend may have been the killer. Made for television movie offers no surprises or suspense. Candace Cameron makes for a weak leading lady and the film features your usual red herrings. Totally predictable and a total washout.

Not Rated; Adult Themes.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
SHOPPING IS MY FAVORITE DRUG
nogodnomasters23 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Drew (Candace Cameron Bure) finds herself in a strange town acting like Laura Fairgate, a girl who was killed. She appears to be possessed by the girl who was murdered by her boyfriend. There is a question as to who was the real murderer and if Drew is really possessed. Drew causes problems in this small community which just wants to move on.

The film has a number of interesting twists. I wasn't expecting the twists with this being a made for TV Lifetime film. The dialogue was horrible and even Teri Garr couldn't sound convincing. However the plot was engaging more than usual. This is not a horror movie. It is a low end thriller. A better Lifetime film in my opinion.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oh Please!
KDejaQ13 June 1999
First Thing I noticed was that This movie lacked Good acting and the second thing was that it lacked good dialogue. With The exception of Casper van Dien I was not impressed. They should have titled this Film screams in the Night to change the channel .
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed