Victims! (1985) Poster

(1985)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
You are the victim
BandSAboutMovies5 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
If you remember the film Night Ripper! that we covered a while back, then you understand what you are getting into with Victims! It's another film from Jeff Hathcock, who also was behind Streets of Death and the Troma film, Fertilize the Blaspheming Bombshell.

Four young girls go on a camping trip in the woods and are stalked by a pair of crazed serial killers. That's pretty much all you need to know. Perhaps a more interesting story would have been what really happened when Hancock ran afoul of an actual devil cult while making this.

One of the killers, Robert Axelrod, would go on to play Lord Zedd on TV's Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. So there's that.

This is one of those strange breeds of film that want to have a feminist message, yet spends most of its running time showing women either being attacked, killed or menaced by raping and killing. So it's kind of hard to get on its message when it doesn't even know what its message is.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I'd like to report myself as a victim of this hapless horror flick...
Coventry18 August 2019
The only remotely intriguing thing about this terrible dud is that, on my bootleg DVD-copy at least, the film starts off with the bloody murders of no less than three young girls, but they are seemingly irrelevant to the rest of the plot and remain unexplained. One girl has an ax planted in her head, another one is sliced up naked in her bed, and the third one gets stabbed in the back by a guy dressed up as an old lady. The killer gets apprehended, but none of these events are ever brought up again throughout the entire film; - very weird. Not that it gets any better, though. Quite the contrary, "Victims!" looks like a typical 80s slasher, but in fact it's more of an overdue and insignificant rape & revenge thriller (like they made many in the 70s). Four free-spirited and deliberately provocative teen girls head out for a weekend in the desert mountains, supposedly for a school project but naturally they are more occupied with parading half-naked in front of gas station attendants and skinny dipping. The four girls encounter two thugs who are hiding because they committed a bank robbery, so I reckon you know what happens next? "Victims!" is extremely unoriginal and boring, boring, boring. The film only lasts 75 minutes, including the random footage at the beginning, but still it outstays its welcome. The abuse of the girls isn't shocking or harrowing, like it was the case in the classics of the seventies ("Last House on the Left", "I Spit on your Grave", "House on the Edge of the Park", ...) and the revenge part is even more tame and pitiable.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Better than Last House on the Left
hallrvdrul19 August 2001
Warning: Spoilers
I was not expecting much when seeing this movie about these 4 girls that get raped in a remote desert. But it turned out that this movie was a little better than another rape movie called "Last House on the Left" directed by Wes Craven. This movie actually had an ending where the woman used a gun to prevail. 3/10
2 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Why are you doing this?" "You oughta know."
Hey_Sweden6 September 2017
"Victims!" is an ultra cheap, ultra crude exploitation feature notable for a misogynistic edge. Two lowlife bad guys played by Robert Axelrod and Lonny Withers go on a crime spree, and target four nubile ladies. These ladies have gone into a remote part of the desert to supposedly study rock formations for a geology class, but seem to be more interested in having fun. The cretins proceed to humiliate the gals for an extended period of time.

Written by John O'Hara and directed by Jeff Hathcock, this movie looks and sounds pretty damn bad. But the writer & director know what their audience demands, and deliver various scenes of nudity and degradation. They get off to an awfully funny start with a couple of random scenes of tacky violence. Soon, they ease into what passes for this movies' story. Still, even at a running time of a mere 77 minutes, they're obliged to pad the thing as much as they can.

The largely unattractive cast give what are some of the worst performances to be seen in this genre. Only Axelrod had a somewhat decent career after this, turning up in some of the Charles Bronson / Cannon Group pictures as well as the remake of "The Blob". That said, these performances *are* fairly amusing in their badness. Axelrod and Withers are stone cold creeps, and a flashback late in the movie reveals the origins of their hatred for women.

And that music score! Composed by Glenn Baxley, it's a mind boggling assortment of inane, keyboard and piano based drivel.

If the photography were of a higher quality, the use of the desert locations would come off better.

This is worth a gander if you're interested in unearthing obscure trash movies, but be warned that it's more tedious than other cinema of its kind.

Five out of 10.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nasty Little Slasher
Michael_Elliott18 September 2017
Victims! (1985)

** (out of 4)

Two lunatics are running around town killing anyone they cross paths with. At the same time four female friends are hopping in their car for a camping trip and sure enough both sides eventually meet up.

VICTIMS! is a film I had never heard of until it hit Blu-ray and after watching the film I'm a bit shocked that it doesn't have more of a following. With that said, there are countless flaws in the movie that prevent it from being what I'd consider "good" but at the same time there's enough decent "slasher" things here to make it worth watching.

The film starts off in an incredibly fast mode as we get three killings within the first couple minutes of the movie. Being in the era of the slasher, the killings are quite gory as director Jeff Hathcock obviously knew who him main audience was going to be. The film gets off to a fast start and things really don't slow down as these maniacs run into several other people with gore that follows.

So, what happens? For some reason all of the killings pretty much come to a complete stop once the two killers and the four females meet up. The film completed changes gears and to be honest with you it gets very boring very quickly. It's really too bad the wild, over-the-top style that was the first part of the movie didn't continue throughout. I'm not sure if these earlier scenes were shot afterwards when they realized there wasn't enough gore or what but there's no question that they are missed during the second half.

Those who complain about horror films being misogynist will certainly hate this picture. There's a lot of women murdered. There's a lot of nudity. There's even some sexual torture as two of the ladies are forced to make out with one another. VICTIMS! is a pretty nasty little film and I just wish it had kept this up the entire time. At 76- minutes it's still worth watching for the nasty stuff.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Passable rape revenge exploitation trash
Woodyanders23 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Two nasty and sadistic criminal scumbags stalk and terrorize a group of young female geology students on a camping trip in the desert.

Writer/director Jeff Hathcock maintains a gritty'n'sleazy leering tone throughout, delivers a generous sprinkling of tasty gratuitous distaff nudity along with some okay gore, grounds the premise in a plausible workaday reality, and makes good use of the desolate desert main location. Robert Axelrod and Lonny Withers do credible work as the despicable misogynistic psycho creeps. David Essex's plain cinematography provides a suitably rough'n'grainy look. Glenn Baxley's shivery synthesizer score does the skin-crawling trick. Although this film suffers from sluggish pacing and a crippling dearth of tension, it nonetheless remains harsh and effective enough to qualify as a perfectly decent piece of grimy schlock.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Junky trash has its moments
one4now423 October 2003
This is, without a doubt, what everyone will agree that it is: awful, trashy, hateful, and sleazy. Still, being a conossieur of things nasty, I don't think it's all that worthless to fans of awful, trashy, hateful, sleazy movies (and by awful I don't mean movies like the mighty "I Spit on Your Grave", which applies to every trait other than awful in the sense that it was at least well-done). Not that I'm some sicko who gets off on rape or anything, but I did like the earlier rape scene based on its bondage qualities. The movie has some moments that are so cheezy and bad, you have to laugh or cry, which earns it some very generously given minor points from me. But, unless you're looking to blow a couple of bucks on renting this BAD movie with awful sound, cinematography, acting, music, gore FX, writing, etc., etc., don't even waste your time. I would give this piece of crap no more than about a half star myself for the very few substitutes for qualities I found in it, which again is VERY GENEROUS.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Trashy piece of rape and revenge misogyny.
HumanoidOfFlesh12 September 2010
Four unattractive girls are raped and subjected to sexual degradation by two sleazy criminals.The desert setting is full of screams.After watching Jeff Hathcock's "Night Ripper" I decided to check out his debut "Victims".In comparison to "Night Ripper" "Victims" is far more exploitative and misogynistic.The acting is awful and some scenes are extremely cheesy,but the misogyny is rampant and some scenes of abuse are actually pretty mean-spirited.The film is obviously influenced by "Last House on the Left" and "I Spit on Your Grave",two exploitation staples of 70's.6 out of 10 for this low-budget piece of smut.Can't wait to see Jeff Hathcock's "Streets of Death".
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
little-seen rape-revenge cheapie
FieCrier15 September 2006
The opening scenes before the title involve women being killed by blades, and then some cross-dressing guy who attacks a woman getting chased and caught. There's a voice-over perhaps relating to that that was cut off on the videotape I watched.

Following that, a couple guys do a robbery, steal a car, sneak up on a couple having sex in a field, kill the guy and rape the woman and steal their car.

Following that, four women go on a geology field trip, and they're unwittingly followed by the two robbers. Predictably, they get stranded and raped, and then fight back. Some Vietnam flashbacks are thrown in to provide some backstory for the two robbers. The ending scenes take place in a police station.

It's not absolutely awful, but it's pretty cheap. Possibly older than 1985, though it references the "Two Wild and Crazy Guys" sketch from Saturday Night Live, whenever that was.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If "Last House on the Left" had been directed by Doris Wishman
drownsoda901 September 2023
"Victims!" follows two psychopaths who go on a killing spree in Los Angeles before accosting a group of female campers in the San Gabriel Mountains and turning their excursion into a nightmare.

This extremely obscure no-budget slasher film from 1985 would likely have been lost to the sands of time had Slasher Video/Olive Films not resurrected it on DVD and Blu-ray several years ago (albeit in a dismal-quality print ripped from VHS, apparently the best elements that could be found). "Victims!" begins in a slapdash manner, with a montage of disparate arbitrary murder sequences that occur one after the other with no context. Almost immediately, the film gives the sense that it was cobbled together in a fairly thoughtless manner, and, well--that's because I'm sure it was.

The film does begin to come together to some degree as it progresses, following the women's abductions and torture at the hands of the two villains. While it's difficult to comment on the artistic merit of its visuals given that the source materials here are so lo-fi, it can be said that the film does have a nasty blunt edge to it, and the sequences wash over you in a way that renders the whole thing feeling like a hazy bad dream.

While there is little to base an argument on that "Victims!" is a good film, fans of Z-grade obscure horror will find this to be a semi-interesting curio. The only way I can describe it is if Doris Wishman had directed "Last House on the Left," and if you know what I mean by that, then this movie is for you. 6/10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Raw Sewage.
EyeAskance15 September 2007
A woefully pissant underachievement that reeks of a very uncool type of misogyny, VICTIMS finds a circle of young female geology students enjoying a relaxing expedition at some nameless middle-of-the-desert location(not the most appealing environment, but it's free to film your movie there). The girls are latterly besieged by some boneheaded creeps armed with hunting rifles on a rape-and-torture excursion. Not surprisingly, the proverbial tables are turned, and the morons are hit with their deserved comeuppance.

Obviously drawing its feeble inspirations from an orbit of vastly superior films like LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT and I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE, this hack-job of a non-thriller is so unskillfully forged that it boggles the mind to know it was given even minimal home video distribution.

Were it not for gratuitous nudity and a light peppering of semi-micro-potent moments, VICTIMS could have been a lightweight contender for ALL-TIME WORST accolades, and although it may have Lilliputian advantages over famously awful films such as ROBOT MONSTER or THE CREEPING TERROR, its flagrant brutish machismo is so abject and gross that it registers as somehow worse than those films in a roundabout, off-the-charts sort of way. Blecccch.

3/10...avoid this cinematic hemorrhoid.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Truly Awful
kevin-1672 July 2000
There are times when you see a movie that is so bad that it simply has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. This is one of those movies. The sound quality is so bad that at times you simply cannot hear what the characters are saying. At other times the lighting is so subpar that you are unable to see what is going on. This movie is meant to be someone's version of sexploitation which is okay with this viewer, but it is done so unprofessionally and with such a lack of taste that the viewer cannot enjoy themselves. The actresses in the movie are not actresses at all and in all honesty they are as ugly as a bunch of wounded goats. Despicable film!
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed