Chill Factor (1999) Poster

(1999)

User Reviews

Review this title
98 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Utter nonsense but at least it was enjoyable to watch
CQKRIS28 August 2006
This film was complete trash, but in a good way. I've always looked upon Cuba Gooding Jnr as a semi decent actor but if this is the kind of film he is going to be starring in, then I can see him descending the same way as Charlie Sheen.

You can see from the outset that the makers tried to make one of those high octane action thrillers, which are ten-a-penny these days. But when you've got a budget that would struggle to finance an episode of quantum leap, then maybe making a film of this kind wasn't such a good idea.

They make use of computer graphics in a lot of the action scenes which, to be honest, doesn't look the worst I have ever seen, but still prompts you to snicker at how bad it is. The most ridiculous of which occurs at the end of the movie, when a chemical weapon which we have been told has the power to blow up basically a quarter of America, detonates in a tunnel.

At this point we are subjected to rotten computer graphics which are so bad that I instantly had flashbacks of Dean Stockwell and the film-making atrocity that was the Langoliers.

But the story is complete nonsense, so even with a budget the size of Lord of the Rings, there would be no way of making the whole thing believable anyway. So you can perhaps see where the producer was coming from i.e. lets make a cheap action thriller and we'll plaster Cuba Gooding's face over the front cover and we'll maybe make some money.

It would've have been better if Eric Roberts had been given the leading role.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Movie Slightly Above Average of Other Action Movies
claudio_carvalho14 July 2003
A scientist (David Paymer) develops a biological lethal weapon and accidentally kills eighteen soldiers in an island during the tests. Colonel Andrew Brynner (Peter Firth) is the commander and becomes the scapegoat of the incident. He is sentenced to go to the prison for ten years. Along this period, he becomes unbalanced and decides to get the bomb to sell to terrorists. He commands a group of mercenaries to steal the bomb from the base where Dr. Richard Long is researching. He shots the scientist but he flees with the weapon to the convenience store where the clerk Tim Mason (Skeet Ulrich) and an ice-cream trucker driver Arlo(Cuba Gooding Jr.) are negotiating. Mason receive this weapon from the injured Dr. Richard Long, with an advice to keep it below 50 F. they try to reach a military fort and try to escape from the colonel's team that is hunting them down.

"Chill Factor" is not a bad film; indeed it is slightly above average for this type of action movie. There are some terrible cuts of the scenes in the edition and the egocentric Arlo is annoying most of the time. The deceptive conclusion makes this film forgettable. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Suando Frio" ("Sweating Cold")

Note: On 02 October 2015, I saw this film again.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent action flick
grahamsj321 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This film is, I believe, a bit underrated. Cuba Gooding stars in this action drama about a terrorist and a really nasty chemical weapon. In my opinion, it deserves a bit more than the 4.8 rating that it has accumulated. I gave it a 6. I found the interaction between the two heroes, portrayed by Gooding and Skeet Ulrich, to be quite what I'd expect from people under similar circumstances. There is intrigue and lots of action, enough to satisfy any action film freak. The story is decent and the screenplay is well-written. I thought the execution was OK but nothing to write home about. All in all, a "Not Bad" action flick that shouldn't disappoint.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
If you like action with wit, this is a good movie to rent.
cbenavidez17 February 2000
I loved this movie. Of course, I like any movie that is packed with action, but is not so serious, that your depressed halfway through the movie. This movie portrayed a pair of undesirables stuck together in a, "wrong place at the wrong time" kind of situation which made them into heros.

Is this realistic? Absolutely not! But was it entertaining? Most definitely! The humor in this movie is what made it good. If they had tried to make this into some kind of serious drama, it probably would have flopped. Thankfully they didn't try that. This movie gets an A+ from me.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Far fetched plot, terrible dialogue, hopeless terrorists: bags of laughs
gtutt14 July 2005
There's only one reason to watch "Chill Factor", and that's Peter Firth (Colonel Andrew Brynner) and his bunch of totally useless elite commandos / terrorists.

The plot is awful, the dialogue is terrible, and it makes you wince to think that Cuba Gooding Jnr once won an Oscar. However, this movie contains some of the most useless bad guys you've ever seen .

Laugh out loud as one chap abseils into the path of a moving van, whilst another rides his motorbike into the grill of an oncoming truck. Grab your sides as Peter Firth delivers line after line of hilarious empty threats, movie clichés, and, in some cases, complete and utter rubbish.

The movie lacks pace (apart from a nicely done initial disaster) and has no idea which genre it belongs to. Is it a bad action movie, a send up, or a comedy buddy movie? Who knows? What I do know is that Peter Firth realised he was making an absolute stinker of a movie and took the opportunity to ham-it-up to the max. He's a serious contender for worst movie bad guy ever, who clearly recruits his goons from the school for the seriously challenged.

Watch out for his numerous attempts to steal best movie leer from John Voight in Anaconda!
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Funny and asinine!
The whole plot was tired and foolish, must of us know that. I myself happen to like cheesy and stupid action movies. Cuba was funny, as I thought he might be, even Skeet turned out to have slight humor in his bones. This is one of those movies where two guys hate each other at first, but end up becoming the best of pals. If you like dumb jokes, and asinine plots, you'll LOVE this movie!
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Third Rate Guy Flick
FlickJunkie-221 March 2000
This 3rd rate action adventure guy flick will probably set Cuba Gooding, Jr.'s career back about 10 years. This film is basically a variation on `Speed' where instead of keeping the bus above 50 mph, they had to keep the unstable chemical warfare bomb below 50 degrees.

Two regular guys (actually two screw ups) must save the world from a group of rogue military mercenaries who are trying to steal a potent chemical weapon and sell it on the open market. The chemical is unstable above 50 degrees Fahrenheit and will explode stripping the skin from any living creature within a hundred miles. Our heroes must get this doomsday weapon to the nearest army base armed only with a broken down ice cream truck and a pistol with no ammo. The half a dozen bad guys are all have elite military background, the latest in electronic equipment, souped up SUV's, and an arsenal of advanced weaponry. Predictably, the mercenaries are no match for our screw ups.

This film is one big chase scene that takes implausibility to new heights of incredulity. The dialogue between Arlo (Gooding) and Tim (Skeet Ulrich) is mindless tripe that attempts to be funny but merely makes the characters seem pathetic. This is consistent with all the writing in this screenplay which is mostly hack.

As far as I can tell, this is Hugh Johnson's debut as a first line feature director, having mostly done assistant and second unit direction and cinematography. In this regard he fails to distinguish himself. His camera work was pedestrian and scene selection was pretty much stock for the genre. The first third of the film was shot with a blue filter, to get a dark look. The odd thing was, he kept the blue filter for the indoor shots and subsequent daytime shots. This indiscriminate use of the filter, rather than creating an effect just made the entire film look washed out. Then suddenly, he abandoned it entirely. On a plus note, the stunts and pyrotechnics were handled well as were the special effects when the chemical weapon test went awry at the beginning of the film. There were some effective moments of suspense like when they tried to take the oversized ice cream truck past the narrow road on the cliff.

Cuba Gooding, Jr. did his best to bring life to a very insubstantial character. He was witty and energetic as always but there was no saving Arlo. Skeet Ulrich was utterly bland as Tim Mason. David Paymer was decent as the arrogant scientist who's ambition for his work exceeded the limits of prudent science. Peter Firth was dreadful as the evil Captain Brynner, leader of the rogue soldiers.

All in all, this film was a loser. I gave it a 3/10. For guys who want a good beer buzz movie while the wife and kids are out of town, this might be okay. Otherwise steer clear.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A good Saturday night stay-at-home special.
ISSACNEWTON2 January 2006
Over the past few months, I've been taken in by some movies that have been deemed 'cinematic masterpieces' by some. I've also had the 'pleasure' of watching TV-movies that can be found at the bottom of the bargain bin in some video stores.

This movie is neither. It is not a 10/10 movie masterpiece, nor is it a bargain-bin, third-rate, C-list, avoid-at-all-costs tape. It sits right in the middle of the spectrum. It is watchable and entertaining, yet not exactly worthy of the Oscar or Golden Globe awards. It was action-packed, fun to watch and a great way to spend a Saturday night at home, either by yourself or others.

Out of ten, I give this film a 7. It lost 3 points for the somewhat hollow acting, but still, it was a fun movie, if you don't take it seriously.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The movie that marked the end of the careers of Cuba Gooding Jr. and Skeet Ulirch.
Boba_Fett113810 November 2009
Skeet Ulrich and Cuba Gooding Jr. once started out their careers as promising new actors, Gooding Jr. had even already won an Oscar at the time of this movie. I have however always regarded this movie as the sort of turning points in their careers, as it's simply a very bad genre movie, with a lame concept and a story that borrows too much from much better other genre movies.

It's not just its concept that makes this movie bad, it's just the overall execution of it all as well. For an action movie it simply isn't a very good one, not in the least because it also borrows heavily from other movies and just isn't original enough on its own to really add anything. The movie is like "Speed" meets "Die Hard" meets "The Rock" and than some movies thrown in the mix with it.

No, I didn't really enjoyed watching this movie, even though the movie obviously got aimed toward it to bring some entertainment, by also adding a dose of comedy to the movie. Gooding Jr. has just never really been my favorite comedy actor and Skeet Ulrich just doesn't fit this genre. The movie tries to be like a buddy flick, in which two totally different mismatched persons just by chance end up with each other, running from a couple of bad guys who want to have a new deadly chemical weapon that detonates when it reaches temperatures over 50 degrees. Luckilly Gooding Jr. is an ice cream truck driver. This already should provide you a troubling image of how this entire movie is being like.

Seems amazing to me in the first place that they decided to turn this concept into a movie. Its concept alone was reason for people to not go and see this movie, which made this movie an instant flop already, far before it had been released. And why some of the actors within this movie actually agreed to be in it is perhaps an even more strange thing. The movie does have some big names in it, next to Ulrich and Gooding Jr., such as David Paymer and Peter Firth.

A movie that is as bad as its concept.

4/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Terrific fun
ExpendableMan14 July 2005
Don't you just love it when you're channel surfing to pass the time, end up watching a film you've never heard of and discover a forgotten gem? This is one of those movies, an action flick with tongue firmly placed in cheek that is very much in the vein of Con Air with its sense of humour.

The plot is basically one part road movie, one part 'Speed' and two parts 'The Rock,' as two blue-collar losers in the shape of Skeet Ulrich and Cuba Gooding Jr find themselves in possession of a top secret military chemical weapon that will detonate and kill millions of people if its temperature exceeds 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Pursued by a renegade military General, the duo set off against all odds to return the weapon to the nearest secure outpost, but there's a hitch; they have to cross the desert to do so.

It may be more Renny Harlin than William Shakespeare in its premise, but the end result is a riotous hour and thirty minutes worth of entertainment. Skeet and Cuba make for a great on screen pair, their bickering providing plenty of laughs and one liners, while Peter Firth is brilliant as the scenery-chewing villain. What makes it even more fun, is that unlike its contemporaries, the two lead characters are utterly hapless. They are just a pair of ordinary guys thrust into a situation beyond their control rather than muscle-clad, indestructible body-builders or Kung Fu experts and they only really survive unscathed by bumbling through the fight scenes.

You can tell the cast are having a great time and in all honesty, Cuba Gooding Jr seems to be enjoying himself so much it's a surprise he doesn't grin like a cheshire cat throughout the whole movie. So get some beers in, get your mates round, switch your brain off and check it out, its a really enjoyable film.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Doesn't fit anywhere...
Big-Mumf6 May 2008
I am not a huge fan of Cuba Gooding Jnr, but enjoyed his performance in Radio, and as all actors put in the occasional good performance, I thought I'd give this fim a go. It was awful. The plot would belong better in an episode of Starsky & Hutch, the villain was (unfortunatly) badly played by Peter Firth, who I enjoyed in the TV series 'The battle for Rome'. Hugh Johnson directed this flick, and this is his one and only attempt, and since this he's gone back to cinematography where he firmly belongs. The plot is thin, obvious and not entertaining. The action sequences are poorly put together and edited so badly it hurts to watch. It's not an action picture, it's definitely not a comedy, but it trys to be both, and fails. I felt the acting was restricted by the director, who is ultimately to blame for this appalling film. All in all, a waste of a Tuesday morning off work!!!!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very enjoyable
UniqueParticle18 June 2021
I originally saw on HBO a few years ago now it's on Starz which I have for a couple months. Quite a thrilling kind of disturbing yet funny in some parts especially when Skeet and Cuba are together. Love the line "I am destroyer of worlds"! Odd the few times I watched this I barely got sleep one of those easy to chill in bed types pun intended; great how well written it is. Peter Firth is one of the best villain actors in my opinion!
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hoo-Eee! This one's a stinker!
janegrey10 May 2002
Sure, this is supposed to be an action-packed buddy flick with nifty stunts and jaunty banter. Uh-uh. This movie is soooo bad it's not even fun to watch. The plot is wretchedly implausible and the action scenes are just dopey. If the dialogue were a little better, we could call it trite. One wonders if the original script was substantially better than the finished product. What else could have lured respected actors like David Paymer and Cuba Gooding Jr. to this project? The mind boggles.

All this being said, this flick will always hold a special place in my heart. I saw it on a first date and he and I were united in our mutual disregard for this clunker. Reader, I married him.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ugh.
jeffraider14 February 2000
This one sucked. I mean, I can see the appeal of a plain-jane action movie, but this one has been coughed up from the phlegmatic lungs of hundreds of other action movies. Every single damned line in the whole thing was a big cliche. For God's sake, Cuba Gooding, Jr. at one point says, "When this is over, remind me to kick your ass." Raise your hands if you've heard that one before. Skeet Ulrich, I liked. Cuba Gooding, Jr., I didn't. The only line he delivers that I liked was the same one that everyone has heard a hundred times in the advertisements, so, I was ready for it. AVOID.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dumb, dumber, dumbest
nospam7812 February 2009
This is a total paint-by-numbers job that is devoid of brains, originality or believability. Every element of it has already been done to death many times over. Interracial male bonding buddy movie? Check. Road movie? Check. Rogue military bad guys? Check. Pseudo-scientific BS? Check.

I really can't imagine what Cuba Gooding was doing in this throwaway effort when he can have his pick of roles. Especially playing second fiddle to Skeet Ulrich, who was reasonably good in the TV series Jericho but is not exactly an A-lister. And Gooding's role was annoyingly formulaic as the hyper, wise-cracking black guy. The bad guys, the country sheriff etc. were likewise straight from central casting.

There was a fairly good chase scene, but I'm glad I didn't pay money to watch this movie.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Far-fetched and plain, but still pleasant to follow
BeneCumb21 February 2013
In spite of several clichés and improbable scenes, the movie was not boring or annoying to watch - thanks to Cuba Gooding, Jr. as Arlo, Peter Firth as Andrew Brynner, and David Paymer as Dr. Richard Long, above all (Skeet Ulrich as Tim Mason was uninviting to me). Perhaps not worth for a cinema visit, but rather good in front of TV screen with a (male) company - and I find it better than most of movies with Norris, Seagal or Dudikoff. Chill Factor is a mediocre A-movie, but outperforms most of good B-movies; that is why I find that the viewers have been too harsh and critical towards it. Fortunately or unfortunately, film-makers like Tarantino, Schumacher, The Coen Brothers, Scott etc have no monopoly on making action movies.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lousy Film! Waste of Time!
lawrence_elliott27 April 2009
I had to review this film because of all the "Not Bad" reviews. This is simply one of the worst films I have ever seen. This one would definitely qualify for Elvira's "World's Worst Films." Cuba Gooding's expletive deleted "Ah S--t!" is screeched from his falsetto voice at least 2 dozen times throughout the film. There is no script and what there is is lousy. There is no story worthy of note. Lousy acting! Lousy direction! They go hand in hand in this film. This movie is consistently bad throughout. Are people going brain dead from watching too many zombie films and/or are they simply smoking too much "weed?" This film should be flushed down the toilet. Or better yet do like Mel Gibson commanded in "Braveheart." "Burrrn it!"
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Watch only if you don't have to pay for it.
rolfhub25 December 2002
This flick is VERY average, on the plus side are great visuals, noteably the landscape portraits, but the dialogues and the whole story are sooooo predictable and not very chilling. If you've seen some similar movies in the past, you will be bored, so i cannot really recommend this one. Also the story has quite some plot holes, so don't think too long about it. Watch it only if it runs on TV, so you don't have to pay for it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Character Holes Are Bigger Than Plot Holes In This Sinking Ship
czar-1112 September 1999
Warning: Spoilers
If you are willing to turn off your intelligence, let the momentum carry you over the glaring plot holes, and ignore the derivative nature of this movie (Speed in an ice cream truck) you may come out of the theatre happy. Otherwise, prepare to be disappointed.

The surface problem with this movie is its inability to decide whether it is an action film or a comedy. Some films - notably the first Lethal Weapon - manage to straddle the divide to good effect, but not this movie. The violence is gratuitous and far too graphic for comedy (both the opening and the climax are unsuitable for the weak of stomach), and the comedy is too broad for an action movie, as well as being forced.

However, what really sinks this film is the lack of any plausible motivation for any character involved. For the first 15 minutes, Major Brynner seems to be the good guy, and Long the mad scientist; yet in jail Brynner is somehow transformed into an evil megalomaniac. This conversion is never justified in the film. Meanwhile, Long has supposedly suffered 10 years of terrible guilt over carelessly causing so many deaths in act 1 - but not so terrible that he has stopped developing the weapon responsible. Yet, we are supposed to regard him as the good guy - at least, one minor character gives us a tedious monologue on how wonderful he is. And then, 20 minutes into the movie he abruptly dies (not a spoiler - it's in the trailer), leaving Mason and Arlo (Ulrich and Gooding) to save the world. Confused? Apparently, so were the writers of this nonsense.

Mason and Gooding's motivation for taking on this mission is never even remotely established. Arlo's excuse, that he is threatened with a gun, is discarded about 30 minutes later when Arlo says he knew Mason wouldn't shoot; and besides, what stopped him from handing over the keys to his van and exiting the story? Indeed, the dull scene in the boat where each tells his backstory, supposedly explaining his motivations, is easily the worst in the movie, highlighting the limited acting talents of both Ulrich and Gooding.

Thus, as the film enters act 2, none of the characters introduced in act 1 is alive or recognizably the same person, and the protagonists have only just appeared. Midway through the movie, another key character, Colonel Vitelli, joins the chase. (Apparently the writers missed the class in Screenwriting 101 where you learn not to introduce key characters halfway through.) Vitelli apparently has a history with Brynner, but that seems to have finished up on the cutting room floor, leaving us with a bizarre scene in which Vitelli tells us that he knew all along it was Brynner (so what? that was never in doubt!) and Brynner again confuses us by laying justifiable claim to being the good guy (apparently, he was demoted for protecting civilians in Vietnam). The possibility that Vitelli might have pursued Mason and Arlo in the mistaken belief that they were the terrorists is thus introduced and disposed of in the space of minutes, neatly killing what might have been the only interesting complication in the progress of this story.

Once Vitelli enters, the second half of the movie reprises the same idiotic chases and explosions of the first half, yet no obstacle is allowed to stand for more than a couple of minutes before our two young heroes dispose of it. As a result, the film never manages to achieve any sense of tension or jeopardy.

The film is so riddled with plot holes, starting with a terrifyingly powerful doomsday weapon that can be stolen by 3 people simply by killing 4 guards, that they are hardly worth cataloguing; but it is the character holes, rather than the plot holes, that ultimately sink this movie.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Bad
o_l_ly17 November 2002
I enjoyed Chill Factor. It had a fair bit of action and the acting was great. There was a bit of humour in this movie also and I found myself laughing in many parts of the movie. The cast: Cuba Gooding Jr. and Skeet Ulrich were great as the protagonists and I love Hudson Leick (pity she didn't have a larger role in this one). David Paymer played a good Doctor Long also. I wasn't sure how good it would be so I am glad that I stayed up to watch this one.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Could have been better
Asteri-Atypical26 May 2001
This movie could have been better if it weren't such a stereotypical, predictable rip-off of Speed and other such genre movies.

I wish original and good writing would make a return, instead of brain-dead plots and trite dialogue that rely on effects and actors' energy to create "eye candy".
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of the better action films I have seen in some time.
Greg-20128 August 1999
Good action flick about regular guys turned defenders of the American people. Cuba Gooding is great as an excitable type, while Skeet Ulrich is the cool one. Once the story is set up, the action is non stop with a lot of "Edge of your seat" scenes. Cuba & Skeet deliver some good comedy lines to take a bit of the edge off the intensity of this film. Their relationship as friends grows throughout the movie so it gives you a good feeling & brings some believability to how they react to each other in tough situations. If you like fast, hard hitting action with a bit of humor thrown in, this movie is for you!
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ok for a action movie!it been done before!
Doc_Who22 September 1999
This movie is a lot similar to "broken arrow" from a few years ago.It was also like watching any buddy action movie (ie Leathal Weapon movie) It will be ok for a rental?perhaps there is some deleted parts that maybe would overall better . The only thing in Chill Factor was the a/c in the movie theater!!You have seen better from the films stars cuba gooding was awesome in "What dreams may come" and Ullrich was awesome in "Scream "and "Phantoms"!!!If you must go leave your mind at the door and be ready for a mind numbing action movie!!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Subpar production value with not much of anything
nymets_6931 July 2000
The low production quality and below average storyline make this film a rather painful experience to sit through. Cuba Gooding Jr. continues to act his "show me the money" routine, which really is getting tiresome, and Skeet Ulrich acts as if he doesn't want to be in the film.

There are a couple of stunt scenes which are notable, but all other prodution areas of this film are just plain awful.

This action thriller is definately missing the action and the thrills.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed