Although the title was changed.It was Directed by Gustav Grundgens. Starred his wife Marianne Hoope. This was a good vehicle for her.'It's a story of a women type.She portrays Effie when she is just 17 quite convincingly.In the beginning when the character is with her girl friends ,playing out doors,the camera keeps a distance a bit from Marianne not to show her age.This was a time when women did not have rights and their parents told them what to do.Kathe Haak and Paul Bilt portrays her parents.They engage her to an older man.Baron Von Instetten,played by Karl Ludwig Diehl.She's excited about it as a young girl until the reality hits.He so busy that he doe snot have enough time for her and he's a bit rigid.So she end up getting busy doing other things.Such as learning to ride a horse.Starting her won little theater and has a ball with it.She has a child later on and matures a bit.But , out of neglect , she ends up having an affair with Major A.D.Von Crampas,played by Paul Hartman, who is just as old as the Baron.This would have been played better if they got a younger actor like Victor Stahl, but this was Gustav viewpoint.She eventually succumbs to a mysterious ailment.She recovers but it starts to get worse.You could not call this Hollywood disease.Lets say its a Nazi disease.The husband finds out and kicks her out .Very ill ,she moves to her parents.It turns out her best friend was her doctor.D.r.Alonzo Geishubler ,played by Max Gulstorff, at the end of her life.The only problem was that it ended quickly as if Gustav ran out of money.It wasn't a dramatic ending.It was still a good movie 4/17/12
2 Reviews
Love Honour and Baby and Duty.
sb-47-60873718 August 2018
A poignant story where a child woman's dreams clashes with bot her and her husband's love, honour and duty.
Though it is based on the celebrated Novel Effie Briest (based on real life Baroness Elisabeth von Ardenne), I find a bit difference in portrayal of characters and relationships, and the difference always need not be for worse, or better, it could be just different.
The main protagonist, Effie is a 17 year old child-girl (Marianne Hoppe at 30, despite her acting prowess, didn't look that age). As the social customs dictated, she is married to a wealthy and quite older Baron, her mother's childhood friend.
Despite the age difference, she is devoted, may be because of her romantic age, and craves the time and attention from him. Unfortunately despite he in love with her (and remaining so, even after marriage) he can't give what she craves for. In addition, the husband is not only close to Power (friend of Bismarck) but also the commissioner of the county, and that puts severe drain on the time and attention he can give to his young wife.
Bored, Effie wanders around in the wilderness, with her Dog, and on one of the occasions she comes across a retired Major, who despite being almost her husband's age, is ready to devote his time on her, and in fact pursues her (a few dialogues indicate that). Naturally in her ennui, she doesn't mind his adventure.
How much she allowed the adventure to proceed is not made clear, in fact from several hints, it seems that she withdrew, and even avoided his company, when it, or rather he, tried to cross the line. At a later stage, in fact she mentioned that the duel was for a 'senseless reason'. But one definitely doesn't ask his wife whether she had a relationship or not (and believe the answer) and secondly the wife was far away then, recuperating from some feigned illness (in fact boredom).
But she had preserved his love and entreaty letters. When these accidentally came in notice of her husband, there was only one way out, challenging the usurper into a duel.
In a poignant scene here, the clash of honor and duty clashes with the sense. When the husband invites his best friend to act as his second in duel, and explains the circumstances, the discussions make it clear where it would lead to, for her, whatever may be the result of the duel. But naturally, and with reasons, the husband puts the duty and honor over love and sense (he professed his love, despite her suspected infidelity, and was quite aware of her fate post-duel). This angle I haven't seen in many (or any) movie, and on reflection, it is quite realistic.
The Lover Major, unlike the husband, seemed to be devoid of the finer senses. Anyway he was expected to be, as one, who pursued a friend's wife, a mother of a child, well aware that the relationship could never come to a 'Forever' end. She too knew that, and had expressed it clearly to her maid, in allusion, probably just before cutting him off.
The end became quite predictable, the moment the husband discussed the matter with his friend, and only question was the result of duel, not what would happen to the three after that.
Not very unpredictable end, if one thinks with clear mind, but quite unpredictable, as usual stories and movies go.
Despite the age of the 17 year old heroine (well after some time, she had been in mid twenties, the child looked lo be about five or six), her acting, the story and presentation- despite having all the elements of a tear-jerking soap, avoiding it, without losing the plot, deserves a place of merit.
Though it is based on the celebrated Novel Effie Briest (based on real life Baroness Elisabeth von Ardenne), I find a bit difference in portrayal of characters and relationships, and the difference always need not be for worse, or better, it could be just different.
The main protagonist, Effie is a 17 year old child-girl (Marianne Hoppe at 30, despite her acting prowess, didn't look that age). As the social customs dictated, she is married to a wealthy and quite older Baron, her mother's childhood friend.
Despite the age difference, she is devoted, may be because of her romantic age, and craves the time and attention from him. Unfortunately despite he in love with her (and remaining so, even after marriage) he can't give what she craves for. In addition, the husband is not only close to Power (friend of Bismarck) but also the commissioner of the county, and that puts severe drain on the time and attention he can give to his young wife.
Bored, Effie wanders around in the wilderness, with her Dog, and on one of the occasions she comes across a retired Major, who despite being almost her husband's age, is ready to devote his time on her, and in fact pursues her (a few dialogues indicate that). Naturally in her ennui, she doesn't mind his adventure.
How much she allowed the adventure to proceed is not made clear, in fact from several hints, it seems that she withdrew, and even avoided his company, when it, or rather he, tried to cross the line. At a later stage, in fact she mentioned that the duel was for a 'senseless reason'. But one definitely doesn't ask his wife whether she had a relationship or not (and believe the answer) and secondly the wife was far away then, recuperating from some feigned illness (in fact boredom).
But she had preserved his love and entreaty letters. When these accidentally came in notice of her husband, there was only one way out, challenging the usurper into a duel.
In a poignant scene here, the clash of honor and duty clashes with the sense. When the husband invites his best friend to act as his second in duel, and explains the circumstances, the discussions make it clear where it would lead to, for her, whatever may be the result of the duel. But naturally, and with reasons, the husband puts the duty and honor over love and sense (he professed his love, despite her suspected infidelity, and was quite aware of her fate post-duel). This angle I haven't seen in many (or any) movie, and on reflection, it is quite realistic.
The Lover Major, unlike the husband, seemed to be devoid of the finer senses. Anyway he was expected to be, as one, who pursued a friend's wife, a mother of a child, well aware that the relationship could never come to a 'Forever' end. She too knew that, and had expressed it clearly to her maid, in allusion, probably just before cutting him off.
The end became quite predictable, the moment the husband discussed the matter with his friend, and only question was the result of duel, not what would happen to the three after that.
Not very unpredictable end, if one thinks with clear mind, but quite unpredictable, as usual stories and movies go.
Despite the age of the 17 year old heroine (well after some time, she had been in mid twenties, the child looked lo be about five or six), her acting, the story and presentation- despite having all the elements of a tear-jerking soap, avoiding it, without losing the plot, deserves a place of merit.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
