Late Show (1999) Poster

(1999)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
German Comedy by ACADEMY AWARD nominee Helmut DIETL
ZeddaZogenau15 November 2023
Surprisingly good film, which in retrospect turns out to be the third part of a tetralogy devised by Helmut Dietl about the German / German-speaking media society.

"Schtonk" (1992) was about the Hamburg-based print media (especially STERN, of course), "Rossini" (1997) was about the Munich-based film industry (Constantin Film), "Late Show" (1999 ) is of course about the depraved private television (RTL) in beautiful Cologne and with "Zettl" (2012) we then went to Berlin, the center of power. Of course, the dialectal colors that can be heard everywhere also fit. All four areas, all four cities mentioned, functioned as melting pots of the German-speaking area, in which Dietl can celebrate a swan song for the cultural industries of the old Federal Republic style.

The film "Late Show" was of course made in the 1990s, a time marked by decisive upheavals. On the one hand, there is a spirit of optimism (remember the euphoric founding of new television channels such as VOX, n-tv and VIVA in the first half of the decade), and on the other, bitter disillusionment as more and more flat-headed people like Beckmann, Kerner and Pilawa emerge as new television stars (, some of which still shape the television business today!!!) and gave a devastating testimony to the further development of the medium of television. One also remembers the events of 2004, when Rudi Carrell almost single-handedly destroyed EUROVISION hostess Anke Engelke's late night show via an interview because, as a woman, she supposedly couldn't handle such a show. So Dietl definitely knows what he is saying here.

Dietl's quotes from German film history are also well done: the Heimatfilm, Fassbinder and the lying soft-focus images (especially in the horse scenes with Veronica Ferres) in the "Emmanuelle" imitators always send greetings. There is more to this film than anyone was prepared to see at the time. It is a lost world that is portrayed here. In 1999, when the film came out, it was still very much alive. Social media like Facebook and You Tube still had their meteoric rise ahead of them. Unfortunately, ACADEMY AWARD nominee Helmut DIETL was no longer able to make his own film about it.

You should definitely give this film a second viewing, there might be surprising insights!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good watch if you like the actors as much as I do
Horst_In_Translation4 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Late Show" is a German 105-minute movie from 1999, so it will soon have its 20th anniversary. The writer and director is the late Helmut Dietl and this is one of his most known works. After his big success with "Rossini" and "Schtonk" a bit earlier, this was probably a very eagerly awaited film and expectations must have been huge. When a man like Dietl makes a movie about the German television business with legendary show-masters Harald Schmidt and Thomas Gottschalk playing the main characters, then this has to evolve into something big right? Well, it did only to some extent I guess. Maybe the film really suffered from its expectations. But I enjoyed the watch, which is probably because I like the two I just mentioned, especially Schmidt and I am also a fan of Olli Dittrich, Karl Markovics and Dieter Pfaff who play minor characters in here, but still get a decent amount of screen time. Veronica Ferres I have never been a fan of and I don't think she is a good actress but I can look beyond her thanks to the people in here that I like.

The comedy is extremely dark here and there are no taboos in this movie. Harald Schmidt is excellent as a ruthless television executive who knows no friends, boundaries or shame when it comes to reaching high audience numbers. Same can be said about his assistant played by Jasmin Tabatabai and she received a German Film Award nomination for her portrayal. I think for the most part (especially the Schmidt scenes), this was a very good watch, but there were parts that did not entertain me too much too, so it's far from a great movie. These would include the characters of Orléans and Ferres mostly, even if the final scene at the show was okay with Gottschalk's character confessing his love to Orléans'. And I also liked the very last talk show scene which rang very true with animal documentaries being so human. Haha. Unfortunately, this film once again shows that Goottschalk just isn't a very gifted actor. This could have been much better with another more skilled performer instead of him. He is an outstanding host, no doubt about it and he single-handedly carried the most successful European television program for decades, but acting (as we know from his "Supernasen" films) may not be his biggest strength. But he is not bad enough either to destroy the film. I enjoyed and give it a thumbs-down, but like I said this has subjectively to do with my liking for many of the actors in here. If you don't appreciate them as much as I do, you probably could end up being bored or even annoyed here.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Much better than I thought
udippel26 July 2020
For a German comedy. German comedies are almost non-existent. Dietl is one of the exceptional directors for this stuff. Well, so and so. I can imagine that anyone from outside of Germany won't find this one very funny; though someone who is acquainted with the main actors could. Gottschalk is a lousy actor, but here he just has to play himself, and that's very much okay. The second hero, Harald Schmidt, has been a successful copy of any late night Leno or Letterman on German TV. Veronika Ferres is one of the worst actors in Germany, and even that fits in this movie: she IS a bad actress. Foreign people would enjoy a former well-known comedian from Cologne being the doctor who give him a jab of morphine to sleep for around 12 hours, and in any dubbing, the southern, alpine, accent of the money man wouldn't work.

I can imagine that the whole lot comes across as a 5, or maximum of 6/10 for the uninitiated foreign viewer. And it could creep up to maybe even 10/10 for those who know Cologne, German private TV business and especially the heroes. Meaning, I could enjoy almost the whole lot simply by being able to understand the self-irony. The I-don't-take-myself-any-serious-in-this-plot attitude of those who kind of play themselves, and the daily fights in their original, similar, positions.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Interesting subject, but disappointing
fitzharraldo20 October 2000
Maybe I'm biased. I have to confess that I have severe problems to like homegrown movies (especially those German films they used to call "comedies"). But with Helmut Dietl directing I thought it at least possible that "Late Night" could prove to be an interesting film. It didn't. So what went wrong? I expected a biting satire about all those idiotic television programs that continue to overflow our everyday life and the people that "create" them. Obviously, there are great possibilities in that concept. Dietl tried to make this kind of satire, but he tried too hard. "Late Night" is a satire without laughs. The screenplay contains too many things that won't work (most of all the plot). As usual with German comedies, the film is mainly dialogue-driven, while visual gags do not exist or are clumsily executed. Only two or three gags really work. The directing is not up to Dietls usual standard. But the biggest problem is that this is a comedy about television, that was co-produced by a television station, that is cast with popular show masters and that looks most of the time like a TV-movie. I wonder what the people involved in this production wanted to say about television - that everybody makes **** instead of them? After viewing this movie, I am afraid that this is not true.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not brilliant, but absolutely entertaining.
Hörnla7 March 1999
"Late Show" is not the piece of art that "Rossini", Dietl's last movie, was. But I'm not sure if we should feel sorry about this. Maybe a topic like cable-TV deserves to be treated in this loud and aggressive way. This is "Kalkhofes Mattscheibe" for the big screen. But although LS is not a masterpiece, it's funny and its satirical arrows mostly hit the point. It's good comedy treating more than relationships, something seldom produced by German moviemakers.

The acting is surprisingly good. Even Gottschalk manages it this time, although it is no challenge to play oneself. The real discovery of this movie is Harald Schmidt if you consider that overacting was the task given to him. Note: If you hate Schmidt, don't watch this movie, but it's a must for everyone who misses "Schmidteinander". Minor roles were casted and played well, especially Pfaff was superb, transporting a sad and desperate tone into the film. Yasmin Tabatabai presents the evilest looking make-up in a movie I've ever seen. Oh- and a law should maybe be passed that hinders directors from casting their girlfriends.

After all, together with "23" a good start into '99 for German cinema.

PS. Enjoy the opening critics, but don't try to read them.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Looking back a nice satire!
piedera3 November 2014
I grew up and went to university in the times of Gottschalk's and Schmidt's Late Night Shows in Germany. Watching this movie 15 years after it was produced still left me entertained. German private TV and media of the 90s well-observed, some brilliant acting. Even Gottschalk manages, though he basically plays himself. Yeah, and Dietl absolutely wanted to have his girlfriend Ferres in all of his movies. He could/should have done without. Who really convinced me was Harald Schmidt, who is actually an educated actor. I loved his cynical TV show and it is just great to see this cynic overacting as a cynic pulling strings. The scene where he loses control of his face when he consoles Engel's stalker nearly made me fall off the couch. I also liked the roles of Jasmin Tabatabai, Dieter Pfaff and Olli Dittrich. And it was good to see Helmut Zerlett and his band on the show again!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Convincing Satire
wude28 February 1999
Helmut Dietls satire places Halrald Schmidt at the front of biting black humor. Furthermore, I found Jasmine Tabatabai worth mentioning as a victim of higher forces. Altogether successful, although unfortunately a somewhat weak ending - nevertheless recommended, provided one likes H. Schmidt!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed