Watership Down (TV Series 1999–2001) Poster

(1999–2001)

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
In the long run it's good. Just goes to show what's missing with kids TV. Adventure.
rggcandy18 June 2006
Ah memories. Coming home from boredom and stress of school. On goes the TV and ahh, nice, watership down. Maybe it was the music that got me watching this. Who knows what it was but I know what made me keep watching it.

If anyone asks me which is better: films or TV series's, I'd have to say TV series's. Why? Mainly because if you make a film you're stuck having to make it all fit into say one or two hours (three sometimes) and even when you're making a film of a book a lot can be missed out. Non readers of that book can be lost with events and sayings which were only explained in the book. With a TV series you have time to spread things out. To explore and develop characters. To explain backgrounds in detail. To really make the audience understand things. If you've seen the film then read the book you'll know what I'm talking about.

That's why I prefer this to the film. There's more of it. You can't help but be drawn into the story line. It's exciting, it's fun. It also has a darker side that gets explored. Scratch away the surface of kiddiness of this show and you'll see.

Why be restrained with only having what's in the book? Apart from spoiling the book it'll never look really good. They've made the story more politically correct by changing one character from male to female and having a main character female mouse so the cast isn't entirely male. But you get by that if you don't think much of that idea.

The underlying plot is really gripping as the rabbits find that new life on watership down isn't as safe as it seems. I won't explain in fear of spoiling the show but it's there.

As I said in the summary, there's a lack of good quality adventure stories that aren't just very very childish and bad. Maybe that's why Harry Potter is doing so well. This is childish as well, I know. After all it was made for children. It's good but some viewers may be thrown by its at first glance childishness.

I miss this kind of show.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The world of Watership Down
wildanimals25 April 2007
Some people who have read the book hate both this TV series and the 1978 film. I've read the book, and do not hate them. Maybe because I saw the TV and film adaptations before.

This series is children's version of the classic novel - so unlike the 1978 film - there is considerably less violence and darkness. Most children will love it because of the endearing characters and fluent animation (quite good for a TV cartoon.) This was one of my favourite shows when I was little, and I liked it because of the way rabbits were presented - intelligent dignified and handsome creatures, not cutesy little balls of fluff.

I must confess, I saw the film before I saw this, and I like both. However, if it were not for this TV show, I would probably never have been eager to read, and love, the book. Many people do not like the 'kiddified' feel, but they do not realise the fact that this was created to introduce children of all ages to the amazing world of Watership Down.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not as good as the book or film, but a very good show regardless
TheLittleSongbird12 September 2012
The book is an incredibly powerful one and the 1978 is one of my all-time favourite movies. So actually considering that the intense nature of the book and film would be simplified for a more family-oriented series I was not expecting much. But I found myself incredibly impressed. In correlation to the book and film it is not as good, but deserves to stand on its own. What was actually impressive about the Watership Down series was that while the ferocity and power was more dominant in the book and film, the series at the same doesn't fall into the trap of making it into a stereotypical cute little bunnies show. There is definitely a darkness and sense of conflict there, but it doesn't feel like too much. The morals are done in a realistic way and the story lines are intelligently done. The writing is strong, not childish or too sophisticated, the music is lovingly haunting and the animation looks beautiful. I actually found the character design of General Woundwort more threatening than he is in the film. The characters are basic in the types of characters they are, but at the same time there is nothing dull or annoying about them. The voice acting is terrific, Richard Briers is suitably earnest and John Hurt takes on the villainous role of Woundwort and is subtly malevolent. Overall, I found it to be a very good show. 9/10 Bethany Cox
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This IS a good cartoon, when compared to all others
orcagurl19 August 2003
I don't see why most of the comments are negative. This cartoon actually makes you think and actually has a serious plot. I mean, look at Sponge Bob Square pants! It isn't a show full of nonsense and crap, it's beautifully animated and challenges the little kids watching it to think and try broaden their perspectives on different situations.

Sure, it has it's cheesy morals about understanding and friendship and unity, but it has to or it wouldn't be considered quite appropriate for young kids now would it? But it still retains some of the melancholy, beautifully depressing atmosphere Adams gave his masterpiece of a novel.

Watership Down's a great show. You should at least watch a few episodes. And the second season, though straying greatly from Adams' novel is still good. More action-packed and a more creative story line, now that Adams' story line is done and they can expand with their own ideas.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
not accurate to the original story but a good kid's show
soulsplosion28 December 2018
This show is made for kids, of which the book was not, so those don't really matter to its audience. It's an exciting adventure for kids probably ages 8-15 but if you are just really easily amused by kids cartoons like I am then sure. It has a lot of themes that I wish kid's shows incorporated more often; it's an actual adventure, with creative lore and danger and peril, and would have definitely been a lot of inspiration for me if I grew up on it. It's definitely made for a more specific audience but for what it is, it's great at it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An extraordinary remake
ethereal_heart17 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Now I know all of us are used the novel version of this classic tale and the old movie version. But don't judge this before seeing it, now there might be a few changes you might notice yes...but still you might find a few interesting things here.

For example: They toned down a few violent scenes. They added a few more extra characters and extended it more with a few themes you might find in a soap opera, along with epic struggles and adventures.

Some may not approve of the changes in the remake, but I like it, it's still has a some things similar to the book and the characters are real enjoyable along with their roles in the story. I have to say this is one of the most pleasant retelling of Watership down and it's a wonderful series for everyone to enjoy.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Would have rated higher if not for season 3 and an abrupt ending
hondacivicdx8 January 2014
I generously give this series a 7. Although it was well done, season 3 and the ending was a let down. I would have rated it an 8 if season 3 reflected season 1 and 2.

It is a unique story and animation following the trials and tribulations of a rabbit warren. It is much like a regular drama except it is animated with rabbits as main characters instead of humans. I think the content is too mature for kids. Perhaps it would be okay for teens.

It was a disappointment that they veered off in season 3 and were much too focused on war and creating a warren at a man made facility (which was not in the book) was just too far fetched. Rabbits are peaceful and gentle creatures and they belong in the natural world and are not adaptable as other animals such as rats or mice.

This aside, my main criticism of the series was that they should have had one more episode to wrap things up and let us witness outcomes. Instead it felt as though it ended short if they ran out of budget.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Watership Down hits TV
ja_kitty_7125 November 2008
I have watched the series when it was on TV, and I absolutely love it! Just like with "Redwall," this series is what got me to read the original book.

As I said (like about a million times), I was shocked and flabbergasted by the negativity I would hear on the internet because I love the animation and the brilliant casting that was put into the show. All you fans of the original novel might not like this, but I love Blackberry as a girl because she could land a cute guy like Campion. I also love Hazel and Primrose. They are my favorite couple. I know Primrose is Hyzenthlay, the main girl from the book and 1978 film, because children wouldn't be able to pronounce the name.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An epic adventure with fantasy elements - about rabbits!
bbshockwave18 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I admit, when I first saw the show during university, I did not think much of it. I caught only the Season 3 episodes and I thought "rabbits at war? That's silly!" It was not until the early 2000s that I revisited the show, after I have read the books for the first time, and that made me realize how deep this show is.

At its core the story is really about friendship, community and togetherness. The rabbits of Watership Down endure and survive because they stick together, help out other forest creatures, and care about each other - contrasted with Woundworth's oppresive gulag of a warren ruled through fear. But the show is deeper than a cliche good vs evil story. Many Efrafans and Darkhaven rabbits who start out as enemies turn into allies and friends, and even those who remain antagonists are not black and white. Even Woundworth himself - voiced in the first two seasons by the awesome John Hurt - has a tragic past and at one point, he seems to understand how his way to protect rabbits is misguided.

The core cast is all great and memorable - Hazel the crafty and charismatic leader, Bigwig the rough and brave warrior, Fiver the often misunderstood runt with prophetic powers, clever Blackberry, kind and stalwart Primrose, grumpy Hawkbit, cheerful Dandelion, friendly and naive Pipkin. They are joined by the boisterous and loud Keehar and the plucky mouse Hannah on Watership Down, where they meet challenges big and small and get into all sorts of adventures. The voice cast is adorably british, with especially Bigwig's cockney accent and Hannah's cheeky voice being super memorable. In smaller roles we have Sandleford survivor Captain Holly and formerly pampered Shining Wire escapee Strawberry and freed farm rabbit Clover - they are largely relegated to background roles except for a few episodes, and only become more prominent in Season 3. Captain Broom, the forgetful yet still spry classic old british soldier type, joins later from Redstone Warren.

The main opposition to Watership Down comes from the militaristic nation of Efrafa, run by the tyrannical General Woundwort. In order to protect rabbits from man and predators, the General imposed tyrannical laws that his Owsla officers enforce. He considers it a fair exchange that his subjects survive even if living in captivity and only allowed to eat and move when ordered. In Season 3, after the destruction of Efrafa in a freak storm during Hazel's attack, Woundwort goes mad and believes he is an agent of destruction sent by the Black Rabbit of Inlé, tasked to destroy Hazel's warren. He is merciless and strict, but does reward loyalty and is not without his own code of honor, and as Fiver and Pipkin both find out, motivated by a tragic past. While only a guest star in Seasons 1-2, Woundwort appears in every episode in Season 3 and becomes more focused in his goal, although sadly this means we lose the awesome John Hurt as his voice, although his replacement is quite good too.

Campion is perhaps the most captivating character of the show, and there is a reason a lot of Season 3 focuses on him. A courageous and loyal officer with a good heart, Campion is a tragic character - torn between his loyalty for Woundwort and knowing in his heart that what his chief does is not right. Despite being honest, Campion is forced ever deeper into a conspiracy to save Primrose and others from Efrafa and becomes a double agent, something that causes him great pain. In a final decisive stroke, he at the same time betrays Woundwort to Watership Down, but also saves his life, sacrificing his own. His story does not end here though, as he survives, albeit horribly scarred - looking like a rabbit version of Two-Face - and tasked by the Black Rabbit to find Woundwort. Thankfully, his resolve to survive after finding love with Blackberry makes him endure to get his much-deserved reward of a happy life with her.

Vervain is another enduring antagonist, who also becomes a main character in Season 3. While on the surface your typical groveling toady with treacherous ambitions, Vervain is not yet another "Starscream" stereotype sneaky second in command. He is cowardly and lives for intrigue, yet he at the same time fears and respects Woundwort and understands he is nothing without his chief. For brief periods we do see that he yearns for a better life, but also that even he knows he has done too much evil to have a second chance at life.

Spartina only appears in Season 3, but is a very memorable character. She is crafty and strong, taught to survive in Darkhaven where only the strong flourish - thus she learned to play all sides and side with the winner, and gather information and use it to her advantage. In her heart though she yearns for something better and is caught off guard by the kindness and help she finds at Watership Down, particularly the affections of Bigwig.

One minor antagonist also worth mentioning is Cowslip, voiced by the awesome Stephen Fry. Not a fighter by nature, he is a crafty and perhaps insane rabbit who lives in the warren of the Shining Wire, well aware of the snares put out by men, but confident that he can endure by sacrificing his own flock to them.

The show gets a major art style change in Season 3 with characters getting redesigned and recolored - I would liken it to the difference between Batman TAS and TNBA. The writing remains as strong as before though, even as the stories become more linear and action-packed.

I own the show on DVD, and have rewatched it several times. It's a really well crafted series and I can only recommend it. While it takes a different direction from the book and the movie, it also has time to develop points and characters that got the shaft in the movie (like Campion), and I'd say the changes are actually sometimes better than in the book. You can consider it an alternate version of the story, basically. At any rate, I definitely much, much prefer the show over the CGI Netflix one, both in writing and especially in art style. Here, you won't confuse one rabbit with another for sure. ;)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good, interesting series, just shows how bravely can lead onto be committed to do what right for one's self and have courage to defend Yourself and with others, have strength
ocumminsty8 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Good, interesting series, just shows how bravely can lead onto be committed to do what right for one's self and have courage to defend Yourself and with others, have strength. I have never actually seen or read the novel/, but I have to definitely say the show is very good, to teach young ones to stand up for yourself and have dedication to not let anyone take anyone down, whether it's people or rabbits , always treat anyone the way that you would like to be treated. Have faith and belief. I feel the sense and willing to have strength and bravery in this series. I loved the memories of watching these series, from when very younger, I loved it , I try was absolutely a great series.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uniquely attractive cartoon
scarlett-3012 November 2000
A series version of the Richard Adams novel, necessarily simplified and restructured for the format - and so missing some of the fierce power of the original - but never giving in to the 'cute bunny' sterotype. Beautiful animation, intelligent storylines and lovely music make for a uniquely watchable show. Highly recommended for thoughtful 8-13-year-olds.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Achieve the goal around two rabbits Efrafa
rghadkrm31 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
That muscular gray rabbit and short ears from Efrafa owlsa (oooone step) and (no sir, nothing) and his buddy gray blond rabbit they are brothers? What's their names?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A poor attempt which rather ruins the story
Raleon24 June 2003
It is still better than nothing, but it may leave fans of the book unsatisfied. It would have been a great idea to turn the movie's adaptation of the novel into a show, and it could have worked, but they have messed around with it too much. Blackberry should not have been turned into a doe. Some say it was to be politically correct. However, this is not politically correct or factually correct. It was an important part of the story that no does had come on the journey, and therefore they needed to go and find some. They could have written the story to have more does. But the bigger problems are with the characterizations. They are more disney like and made to appeal to more to the younger generations, which is the opposite of what the movie did. A significant aspect of the characters is that they are not disney like. and although I am usually opposed to senseless violence, it ruined the story to lighten the violence on this show too. The dialogue is also dumbed down. However, it does give a much more broader look on the story it is based on, and additional stories they made up from the novel. This makes it worth watching. Other than that, let your children read the novel if you want them to experience Watership Down.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great series, Destroyed by people that hate different things...
silverfox475899 August 2004
Although many would say that it doesn't even compare to the 1978 film, Personally I'd say it was better. I love the Characters it makes it hard for me to pick a favourite, Which I one of the things I love about it. Blackberry changed from Buck (Male) to Doe (Female). I love the female Blackberry and it was nice to have a Sandleford doe on the Down. This series introduced new characters, never featured in the book such as Spartina or Hickory. It also showed Redstone warren and Darkhaven warren. Characters like Hawkbit, Strawberry or Silverweed made it into the Series. Lapine was still used but I think there should have been more. I think the changes in this series were great, Remember though its only Based on the novel by Richard Adams and if it had of been the same as the film, It would have been quite boring!
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
If there's nothing on the other channel....
G.Spider18 December 1999
The famous novel is the latest thing to fall victim to the commercialism industry. Everywhere you look now there is 'Watership Down' merchandising based on this TV series.

Re-makes rarely turn out anything as good as the originals, and that's certainly the case here. This series is a product of a modern generation which seems to think that kids can only watch cosily bland stuff - I saw the original film when I was a youngster and I never had nightmares. The voices in this TV series version are variable. A few of the vocalists from the original film return, but most of the voices are just typical 'cute cartoon bunny' voices and many supposedly serious scenes are rendered laughable.

Too early-morning-cartoony to be taken seriously, too slow and uneventful to be regarded as comedy. Do yourself a favour and get the original film on video - it's been re-graded from a PG (Parental Guidence) to a U (suitable for all), so even the producers must realise it isn't all that shocking for youngsters.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good for kids and cartoon lovers, not for novel fans
gecko208276 December 2007
As the summary says, this is a good cartoon for kids and TV lovers. It's got all the generic yet lovable characters: a wise leader, a strong fighter, a wisecracker, a sarcastic guy, a smart gal, a cute kid, a big, fierce enemy, and an unsuspected bonus: a prophet! It's fun at times and serious when need be, always interesting and doesn't make you lose interest two minutes into episode one like some cartoons can.

All the same, parts of it are kind of an insult to the original novel. Blackberry, originally a smart male, is a female in the show. (Well, naturally...) Pipkin is a child, not an adult, and some characters were completely cut out, such as Silver and Hyzenthlay. In fact, Hyzenthlay has been replaced with a new female, Primrose. Most lapine words and names, including the does we know from the book like Hyzenthlay, have been taken out, probably since kids can't pronounce them. Kehaar is also much more friendly and rabbit-loving than his book or even movie counterpart. He's been given a little mouse friend who tails him a lot, called Hannah.

I know most of this comment is negative, but that's probably because I read the book before I saw the movie. The series is actually cute, and if you just ignore the parts that are different from the book, it's certainly a show worth watching. Enjoy!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Good Story Stripped To Nothing
inshadowz2 April 2006
I first saw the Norwegian dubbed adaptation of the first part, and was horrified. With the original English voices it was marginally better, but I could still have done well without it. I think my greatest handicap in this is that I'd read the book before watching the cartoon. I swear I will never, ever watch the remaining episodes.

Everything essential has been stripped from the original story, and what little they left in is drowned in poor animation and amputated dialog. The {original English} cast have done a very good job with the voices, all things considered, but sadly it makes little difference with the final result. It looks cheaply made and the characters lack any hint of life, just like any run-of-the-mill cartoon aimed at children who just want to see a bunch of cute bunnies moving about and talking. In my humble opinion, this one is not worth the watch, no matter how old you are.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This cartoon need to be baned!
needleclaws17 February 2006
I am sixteen and I watched this movie when I was five thinking it was a cute movie about rabbits! I was shocked to see this movie and had for a year been scared of rabbits yes rabbits! This movie is not right for young viewers to watch and should at least have a warning on there saying some thing to parents so there little five year old child doesn't go and watch rabbits foaming at there mouths and killing each other! Why it should have a warning sticker. 1. It looks like its made for a young child and sounds like it on the back summery and so is given to a small child to watch. 2. If you cant properly put an age group on there that fits what its about at least war people with things such as. This movie hold violence and include scenes with goer and animal cruelty and may not be suitable for young viewers! Why it should be banded. 1. This is just a horrid movie with politics mixed with it and showing people how governments work differently in different places I.E the rabbit groups. 2. I'm sorry but are children should not see a dang bunny! getting shocked to death by a trap! 3. Children should not see rabbits foaming at the mouth and fighting because rabbits if you look around and see are remodels for our children posted every were and put every were so what do you think they will see when they watch this move? O mommy loves when I make my bed like momma rabbit thought daisy to ma-by she would like it if I hit people to like those bunnies are showing me.
0 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed