User Reviews

This movie is much more realistic than what you see in movie theaters in USA. Just watch it and tell me which part of the movie you disagree. Germans even predicted the quasi-state Israel in the movie. There is no caricature of black and white, it is depicted as it is. The exact opposite happening in current Hollywood about how "USA won the war and defeated Germans". 8 out of 11 German soldiers fell while fighting against USSR, not USA.

Just think about this: in 1940, WW2 raging on, Germans made a movie about England, their arch-enemies. Even so, they don't depict English as caricature enemies. They are giving a message that their enemies are not English Folk. However David's Star at the end of movie projecting on England sums it all up.

The Prince of Hesse is fleeing for his life, so he deposits his Bank of England notes with Mayer Rothschild at 5% -- notes gained by renting his troops to England to die in the American Revolution. Mayer sends them to his son, Nathan, in London -- played by Erich Ponto. He uses them to gain a foothold in the gold trade, then in transferring money from London to Wellington in Spain.

In the meantime, he is opposed by the British banking and trading interests. Not because he is Jewish, but because he is not one of them. Those are the points raised throughout this money: English snobbery, shortsighted stupidity, and only Ponto can see a little more clearly into matters, search out information and use it to his advantage. In the end, he ruins all the bankers, and worse, their depositors, the ultimate source of all their funds.

Despite a very anti-Semitic postscript to the film, the message is the ultimate evil of bankers of every stripe, jealous of others' success, seeking their own profits. Ponto gives a fine performance, trying desperately to fit in, rebuffed at every turn, elated when his plans succeed, screamingly depressed when they do not. Hans Stiebner, as his agent who always seems to have the news before anyone else, is also excellent, as a man who has come out of the poor Jewish ghetto, yet acts as if he is still there.

Yet in the end, this movie is about the evil of everyone: the bankers, the Jews, Wellington, who is no more than a womanizing playboy, the English, who refuse to admit that it was the Prussians who won Waterloo, the network of Jews through Europe and North Africa who whittle ten thousand guineas in London to 5500 in Spain, Wellington, who steals another five hundred, the French Minister of Security who gets half of the 'commissions'.... it's a clear message that no one can be trusted. Its us against the world, and we -- meaning Germany, of course -- must and will win.

This is one of Nazi Germany's most vicious antisemitic films. It was released in 1940, the most antisemitic year movie-wise throughout the entire Nazi era with Veit Harlan's Jud Süss and Fritz Hippler's and Joseph Goebbels' Der ewige Jude being released later the same year. Die Rothschilds is not nearly as notorious as the other two films but still the antisemitic message is crystal clear. In the final episode the protagonist, Nathan Rothschild, draws lines on an imaginary map of Europe from London to Vienna to Napoli to Frankfurt to Jerusalem to mark cities under Jewish control having thereby drawn the Star of David. As in Jud Süss the film concludes with a written text intended for the German audience of 1940. The text explains that the descendants of the Rothschild family are now on the run away from Europe as refugees (thanks to National Socialism) but that the struggle against Britain continues. Today we know that the Holocaust was initiated in 1941.

*****This Review Might Contain Spoilers*****

DIE ROTHSCHILDS AKTIEN AUF WATERLOO or THE ROTHSCHILDS' SHARES IN WATERLOO (1940) was the first anti-Semitic film produced by the Nazis. Unlike their virulent 'documentary' THE ETERNAL JEW, it's propaganda disguised as a historical biography but nowhere as skillfully inflammatory as JEW SUSS, another historical 'biography' that had a stronger impact on audiences than the other two films released the same year. Goebbels produced these three films as a reaction to earlier foreign versions with the same titles that were sympathetic to Jews.

The film begins with Erich Ponto, the most recognized cast member who was a popular character actor seen in DAS MADCHEN JOHANNA (1935) and DIE FEURERZANGENBOWLE (1944) and after WWII in THE THIRD MAN (1949), cast as Mayer Rothschild, the head of the banking family, making a deal to hide the Mayor of Frankfurt's 600,000 pounds in England from Napoleon and with the help of his sons Nathan in England, and James in France, the family uses this money to build their fortune and finance Wellington's army. Nathan is first seen violating the Sabbath to further the deal and later treated with disdain and blackballing by the snobbish members of the British Stock Exchange when he attempts to ingratiate himself into their business and social world because he's 'not one of them', i.e., a Jew and worse, a foreign one. After Nathan seizes the opportunity to give a rival's wife a ride in his carriage, her husband coldly asks he if wants to be reimbursed and a surprised Nathan says politely "You're trying to insult me." The husband replies: "No, Mr. Rothschild. I'm just trying to prevent you from losing." a dry dig about how Jews stereotypically must be making money every minute of the day.

Nathan frets over his risky wheeling & dealing with England and the anti-Napoleon French, and eventually he makes a fortune unlike his brother James's negotiations with the French Chief of Police who must receive high kickbacks for them to do business. Nathan ruins his enemies by spreading the wrong news about the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo to manipulate stock market prices. The Mayor's money is safely returned with a bill for the Rothschild's handling fee and he questions James in how much more they really made off him as "nothing is more disgusting than one pickpocket telling lies to another." The film ends with the Commissioner of the Treasury and a victorious Nathan showing him a map of the world and connects the cities where his family's banks are located by drawing a hexagram then superimposed with a flaming Star of David. The closing title tells us: "By the conclusion of this film, the last of the Rothschilds have left Europe as refugees. The struggle against their English accomplices, the British plutocracy, continues."

Not only is ROTHSCHILDS anti-Semitic, it's equally anti-British as outlined in scattered titles. The film's production history should be noted as the film's original title was lengthened later when the film was re-edited: "Beyond its indictment of "Jewish" intrigue and avarice, THE ROTHSCHILDS aimed to show the 'Judafication' of British society at Rothschild hands, and thus demonstrate why, in Goebbels' words, Britons had become "the Jews among Aryans." Yet the film's dramatic conventions did not always mesh with its racial politics, and when the film was released in July 1940, German audiences were left unclear as to just who they were mainly supposed to hate. Goebbels had it pulled from distribution; a year later, a much-revised version, purged of any conceivable sympathies for its British characters, was released. The revamped movie was renamed THE ROTHSCHILDS' SHARE IN WATERLOO" and this is the only version available.

Even in the film's existing state, it's not as anti-Semitic or anti- English as you would expect, something the filmmakers miscalculated with mixed results. You do feel some sympathy for Nathan who's continuously snubbed by his rivals and when the Commissioner of the Treasury questions their motives in denouncing his actions, he advises them not to be prejudiced because Nathan is Jewish and sends them away. At this meeting the Commissioner seems sympathetic to Nathan's plight which goes against the film's propaganda intent or should audiences think it's a sign of his naivety and a warning for them not to trust Jews but at the film's conclusion we learn he's not naive because he's seen with Nathan who's gloating over his victory, meaning the Commissioner was shrewd in surmising who would be the better moneymaker to help England and most likely himself as the English go hand-in-hand with the Jews as stated in the end title quoted above. However not all the English are portrayed badly. You will probably feel more sympathy for the lower classes who lose their savings when their banks fail. There's also a subplot concerning a decent young man who wants to marry a broker's daughter but is rejected by her father because he isn't wealthy and is hired by Nathan not for altruistic reasons but to acquire favorable military info. The handsome couple is protected by an Irish woman who constantly speaks her mind against English hypocrisy and Nathan's flattery as Nazi films fantasized the Irish as their anti-English 'allies.'

THE ROTHSCHILDS' SHARES IN WATERLOO is a provocative costume picture heavy on plot and dialog so you might have to see it more than once to follow the monetary and political intrigue: There's also a love story nicely fitted into the plot to make it appeal to a wider audience. There were some earlier films with mild bits of anti-Semitic humor like ROBERT AND BERTRAM (1939) but that comedy's emphasis was on the two Aryan leads avoiding working for a living. ROTHSCHILDS was the first of Goebbels's major propaganda weapons and a serious drama where the main character was Jewish and also the villain and not a comic one.

I cannot dissociate the anti-Semitic propaganda on this movie, that I acquired and saw only for historic matters. We cannot ignore what Hitler and his fanatics we're about to set a few time after.

The best way to view The Rothschilds from Nazi Germany is to view this side by side with 20th Century Fox's House Of Rothschild that starred George Arliss as Nathan Rothschild. In many ways this is the same story and seeing both films can tell you a great deal about the medium of film and its value for propaganda when you tell the same story, but slant it differently.

In the American version the Rothschild family is shown as canny business people, but patriots who staked their personal fortunes on the outcome of the Napoleonic Wars and that final Battle Of Waterloo. They faced the anti-Semitic prejudice and triumphed. The same prejudice that Joe Goebbels and the German film industry was trying to spread.

The Rothschild sons go to different parts of Europe in both films and Carl Kuhlman playing Nathan Rothschild here is working for a consortium of Jews looking to make those profits no matter how things turn out. The plot could have been taken from The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion, it's that vicious.

The British themselves are shown as a bunch of greedy speculators anyway and the French don't really deserve a guy like Napoleon Bonaparte running things. The saviors of Europe were of course the Prussians. They certainly arrive in the nick of time to insure victory for the Duke Of Wellington in real life. But overall their performance in the Napoleonic Wars wasn't all that great.

Note that the film's release came on July 17, 1940. The end of the film had a coda saying that the Rothschilds and their Jewish agents are all refugees from Europe now, but we still have to deal with those left in Great Britain. That's about the time Mr. Hitler did start dealing with the British home land in his usual fashion.

The Rothschilds, a great example of Hitler's use of film to fan anti- Semitism. Getting rid of these Jews and their evil practices, it's what our crusade is all about.

You can't watch this film without a shudder.