Killing Me Softly (2002) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
112 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Future Camp Classic
Maciste_Brother8 May 2003
I rented and watched KILLING ME SOFTLY on DVD and giggled throughout the movie. It's so unintentionally funny, and silly and stupid and pointless, that I'm sure people in the near future will look back at this as camp. The film stars Heather Graham and Joseph Fiennes. Heather's character goes though a number of things or does things that are totally divorced from logic. She marries a man she hardly knows and the rest of the film is spent on her trying to know her husband's suspicious past. (If Heather's character had tried to get to know him first before marrying him there wouldn't have been a movie). Heather's role is funny and oddly endearing at the same time. She tries so hard but the whole thing is so silly that her efforts are all for naught. In EVERY scene, Heather is seen with her big doe-like eyes, dropping her clothes at any given moment, looking totally befuddled. The scene when the reporter faxes her the strange messages at her office, which is supposed to be filled with apprehension, is very funny. As is the scene when Heather pretends to be a reporter from The Guardian. Or the scene when Joseph ties her down on the kitchen table, which is simply priceless. Heather, bound to the table, doesn't look terrified or stressed, she looks bored and annoyed. The entire scene is truly out of this world. After seeing it, I wondered "What was that all about?" If your new husband ties you up on the kitchen table and starts going crazy, well, there's a good chance that the marriage won't last long. As for Joseph Fiennes, well, he looks, hmm, weird. I think the director was intimidated by Joseph. It seems the director didn't know how to film him at all. And because of this, his character/performance is WAY over-the-top.

The story (or lack thereof) is so obvious, the moment the "villain" appears on screen I knew it. The revelation of the villain's motives made me laugh out loud. It's supposed to be shocking and twisted but it had me in hysterics. Add to this the fact that the director literally took the meaning of title and applied this to the film's script/action, and everything about this film ends up looking truly silly. Everything is treated just so softly (like when Heather is tied to the table). Imagine a S&M movie directed with the soft touch of a bunny rabbit.

Many scenes look like they were rushed (the mountain climbing scenes). In one scene, you can see Fiennes looking straight at the camera for a split second. The direction is not really good. The look of the film is sometimes interesting. Some scenes where cool but the whole ultra-hip look of the film will positively date it in a matter of years. The office where Heather works looks like a place where the Teletubies would feel at home. Everything about KILLING ME SOFTLY is hilarious. It's pure camp.
93 out of 127 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Razzie material
=G=27 January 2003
"Killing Me Softly" tells of a couple who has sex, gets married, and then has problems because she (Graham) grows increasingly suspicious of him (Fiennes) whom she never really got to know before the marriage (duh). On the downside, the film has a thin story full of plot holes and implausibilities with ponderous music which is always off target and a perfectly awful school girl performance by Graham. On the upside, it's a good shoot with good camera work and lots of Graham skin. Overall, "Killing Me Softly" is a classy loser only for the less discerning viewer who wants a little suspense (very little) to zone to. (C)
66 out of 97 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good movie, unjustly prosecuted by the critics...
buiger16 January 2007
I fail to understand why all the critics are coming down on this film with such vicious fury. Granted, this is not a Hitchcockian masterpiece, but please, give the movie a break. The same critics give decent marks for movies which are really way below this one, and sometimes even to pure trash, as long as they have a good Hollywood pedigree. Well, this one may not have the proper pedigree, but I nevertheless found it to be a very decent thriller, one that kept me interested and on edge most of the time, had a plausible story, and one whose ending was not totally predictable (which is more than you can say for most thrillers nowadays).

All in all, a good evenings entertainment for adults, well worth watching.
36 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
short of quality
jadeable-371237 August 2021
This film is not a very good movie.

A lot of implications are arranged but none of them does not work at the end. No interrelative and multi layered ending.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Killed Me Slowly
mkolowski4 June 2003
Killing Me Softly W/ Heather Graham Rating: DUD

The main reason I picked this movie was because it was unrated and had Heather Graham in a starring role. Would that translate into hot love making scenes? YES! I no longer have to use my imagination to see what she looks like having sex with no clothes on. Aside from that, the movie totally blew chunks. Plus, she's not really a great actess if you haven't noticed. But if your looking for a semi-porno movie without the shame of actually renting one, this is IT!
28 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not too bad, given the premise
kausix77727 April 2009
There are many implausibilities in this movie. This is not exactly erotica, nor is it drama (the characters barely speak and considering that, the expressions are not enough). HG's character, Alice, seems too cute to be sexy and adventurous.

Also, I have watched many films with similar endings, so I could guess it much earlier. However, the red herrings were nice.

I couldn't understand the loose end of Alice's boyfriend seen with her colleague.

Overall, I feel that this film's premise could have been explored on film much better than how it was. And the acting was rather on the poorer side.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Trash
gina117714 January 2008
Firstly, a look on the bright side: You might like this movie if you are in the mood for some trash thriller with outstanding awful performances of otherwise capable actors in a nice setting with a pretty and well-dressed Heather Graham. It could also deliver some funny embarrassing moments if watching this movie on a first date. Thus it scores 2 points.

Watching this movie in a theater at a sneak preview and thus knowing nothing about it, the ridiculous mixture of plot, dialogues and attitude of the main characters lead us to the misinterpretation that we were seeing a satire. Only after about 20 minutes we realized that it was just a stunningly bad thriller. We still had some fun and good laughs. I wonder what it takes to make an actor like Joseph Fiennes to play so poorly. Maybe he, too, thought this was meant to be a satire.
26 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great "who done it?" with a lot of sex at no extra charge.
acearms27 December 2003
Terrific portrayal of a love between two people, Joseph Fiennes' and Heather Graham's characters. The scenes involving their sexual exploits and honey moon were magnificent. The darker side of the movie involved a suspicion that Fiennes' character was a murderer and Graham's character was the next victim. Not so! The twist at the end was reminiscent of Alfred Hitchock's movies and the Iron Sides TV shows with Ramon Burr. Remember them??? Great movie to watch and easy to get involved with. Highly recommend viewing.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Killing the viewer slowly
wesb17 March 2006
This is not a good thriller, not a good romance, and really just not a good movie.

Though Heather Graham does a nude scene, which is a selling point for many, she is such a bad actress throughout the rest that it is painful to watch. It seems that she feels furrowing her brow is all it takes to register confusion, fear, sadness, concern, and anger. Joseph Fiennes is acceptable, but really reduced to glowering most of the movie.

The only real suspense is whether you guessed the correct killer about 30 minutes into the movie.

It is painful to watch and not really one to waste your time on. Even Heather Graham fans eager to see some brief nudity will most likely be disappointed.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Heather Graham ...wow
Blumanowar28 February 2021
She may be one of the most beautiful women ever at that age. She was so 'real' as well, good acting by both she and Fienes. Sexy and spooky. Good Flick def better than a 5.5 rating.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It could not get any worse! How can it be this bad?
zzmale24 November 2003
Director's at his worst in his pathetic attempt on mainstream American movies, but ending up as something for midnight class-B soft core porno flicks shown on Cinemax.

It is a great shame that the director had lived in the USA for a while in the late 1980's and frequently revisited USA after that, but his impression of USA is no different than the typical Chinese who had never been to USA, at least from what was shown in this film: The only thing about USA is SEX. Too bad that imdb does not have any negative scores, which this film properly deserves, well, you can give it a zero considering the sacrifice the actors and actress made, and adding the sex scenes, a score of one is the max.

This first clumsy attempt of the director on USA mainstream movies may just as well be his last, but, on the positive side, it opened a door of great opportunities for him in the class-B midnight soft core porno flicks.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Thriller with some sex.
arcadia19 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I really feel that I have to defend this movie after the ripping it has gotten here. I watched the film without knowing anything about it, and I really enjoyed it. Heather Graham was easy on the eye, and Joseph Fiennes was suitably dark and brooding. I think that the sex scenes, probably allowed people to view this as a cheap skin flick, which is a pity. They probably should have gone further to ensure that Fiennes was viewed as a sadist, and therefore very capable of killing. There was plenty of tension, and the music was suitably Hitchcockian.

If anything, Joseph Fiennes character was too laid back towards the end. As the tension was mounting, more could have been made of the fact he appeared to be a murderer. Instead he was allowed to sit back and protest his innocence. I think had it been a Hitchcock film we would have been in no doubt he had done it, until the end. The sister could have been a really sinister character, but again lacked any development. I am not blaming the actors for this, it is obviously the script. Heather Graham is a better actress than people are giving her credit for here. I think with the lack of development in the Fiennes, and sister characters, she was left to carry the film alone, which she did admirably. I would recommend this film, just watch without prejudice. Incidenally, I married my wife after six days, and without knowing anything about her. We are still married after 32 years, so perhaps Heather was not so crazy, as stated in some of the earlier reviews.
27 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
5 Shades of Grey
gbkmmaurstad20 September 2017
This is a sexual, psycho, murder mystery. Alice (Heather Graham) is an American in London who is in a relationship and living with a nice enough guy, but she's bored. One day on her way to work she and Adam Joseph Fiennes) see one another on the street and can't stop watching one another.

Adam leads Alice on a sexual adventure, one in which she can't be without in the beginning, but eventually fears. Adam a mountain climber is a man of mystery, both in where he goes and who he knows.

Interesting film, but not everyone's taste, might want to preview this one before watching it with someone, definitely not for family viewing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Makes "Body of Evidence" look like "Citizen Kane"
mikegray24 June 2002
Ah, Erotic Drama, last bastion of the predictably dire film... Killing Me Softly is a half-assed attempt at an erotic mystery with no redeeming features whatsoever (unless you consider a glimpse of Heather Graham's breasts to be worth two hours of torture). Fiennes appears to be being paid by the word (he maybe says twenty during the entire movie) and is limited to grunts and baleful stares, Graham appears to be trying not to laugh most of the time, and the plot twist is by turns obvious and ludicrous.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Heather Graham, with all her (ahem) bountiful talent and charms.
TxMike18 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
OK, everyone seems to be trashing this movie, but it isn't that bad. Implausible? Yes! But Graham and Feinnes do credible jobs and we see plenty of Graham skin, which is very nice skin, as actresses go. Much better than Kathy Bates in About Schmidt. Graham plays an American working in London, Feinnes is a famous mountain climber and hero, but has a dangerous look. They become attracted to each other and the fun begins. Not a good movie, not a bad movie, a nice 100-minute diversion that is more entertaining than many.

some MAJOR SPOILERS follow, please read no further, OK??

Most implausible, Graham and Feinnes make eye contact one morning as she goes to work, she sees where he goes, they meet, take a cab ride to his place (actually, his sister's, we learn later), have wild sex, knowing nothing about each other. And she was already in an apparently committed relationship with a nice, but dull, Brit. The wild sex happens often, we see plenty of Heather, we learn that her left breast is measurably larger than her right, she gets cautionary notes, "How much do you really know about him?", he sees her assaulted by a petty thief, runs him down, beats him viciously, they get married quickly, she knows he has a temper, begins to suspect he is really a bad guy, finds out a former girlfriend has been missing several months, she and his sister go to dig, they find body, turns out sis is the killer, she and Feinnes had an incestuous relationship when they were children, she wanted to posses him, killing any women who become close. For some unknown reason Graham and Feinnes end up splitting up.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bleah!
eviltrav3 January 2004
Quite possibly one of the worst films i have ever had the misfortune of being subjected to. Predictable, dull... just plain stupid yep.. this film has it all! They could have sold advertising space on the backs of Fiennes and Graham we saw so much of them. A truly awful film experience. In fact i had a good laugh that the so called film maker expected that films like this can still be rolled out to the general public. Avoid this at all costs, or perhaps buy a copy for someone u don't like!!
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The music even reminds me of a Hitchcock thriller!
yada212121 February 2021
I can't believe this movie isn't higher rated. It certainly reminds me of the best of Alfred Hitchcock's stories. Heather Graham is one my personal favorite actress. I would watch anything she does.

It is interesting how some of the same images purposely created by Hitchcock are used in this movie too. The same kinds of plot twists. Although different in context, they are similar enough to the same memorable emotions. I guess this is what defines a film genre.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst films I have watched in years
mikegibb-6041824 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This film isn't just bad. It made me cringe. The script is grim and the direction worse. And then there are the actors. Fiennes spends the whole film glowering silently and moodily while the usually reliable Natasha McElhone is just over the top. But both of their performances are Oscar quality compared with Heather Graham. She is SO bad that during some of her intense moments I actually burst out laughing. The whole sorry mess could have limped towards mediocrity if it hadn't been for the very silly plot and the fact that the big twist was blindingly obvious half way through. Please don't waste the best part of two hoys of your life on this trash.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I LOVE it
instyleprincess21 May 2004
OK....I have to say at first, I was attracted by the hot sex scenes like most people, and that's how I get to know this movie first. But after watching it, I can just say I love it. There are more than great sex scenes in this movie; including the change of the intimate relationship between the two characters. The movie is also quite tense, and I can't describe how the ending moved me. The ending was so so sad and almost get me in tears. The music in this movie is great as well. There are a lot of details in the movie for the audience to discover (the way-out signs all over in the movie). People shouldn't just focus on the hot sex scene, cuz this movie is just great.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Never boring but oh-so-predictable.
gridoon11 May 2003
"Killing Me Softly" has one of those scripts that just don't give the audience a break - not only does it set up an improbable situation, but the big "twist" at the end is also mind-numbingly predictable (unless perhaps you haven't seen a thriller before in your life). The chemistry between the two leads is also lacking; Fiennes brings some physical magnetism to his role but as far as his acting is concerned, he's an inexpressive bloke, while Heather Graham is ALL TOO expressive - she overemphasizes every emotion her character is supposed to feeling by making faces at the camera. Besides, she's not even that attractive; even her co-star in this particular film, Natascha McElhone, blows her out of the water in that department. In spite of all that, Chen Kaige's direction is good, and he creates some suspenseful moments. So I give the film a generous "** out of 4" rating.
28 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Heather Graham Is an Excellent Actress and Does not Need to Be Exposed Naked So Many Times, Like in This Predictable Movie
claudio_carvalho13 March 2004
Alice (Heather Graham) is an American website designer living in London with the engineer Jake (Jason Hughes). Their life is a routine, they love each other and Jake wants to marry her. One morning, while going to her work, she meets the climber Adam (Joseph Fiennes), and immediately they have a great sex, feeling lust for each other. A couple of days later, Alice decides to leave Jake and meets Adam's sister Deborah (Natascha McElhone), and they become friends. Then, Adam and Alice are in love for each other and decide to get married. While living together, Alice receives some anonymous letters and realizes that she does not know anything about Adam's past, and she suspects he killed his former girlfriends. This erotic thriller has a very predictable end. I do not understand why Heather Graham accepted such a role. She is an excellent actress and does not need to undress so many times like along in this film. I hate the idiot face of Joseph Fiennes, who looks like the horrible Christopher Lambert, only younger. The plot is very predictable: how many thrillers show a woman who meets a guy, fall in love with him and then realizes that he is a psycho, maniac, killer etc.? I indeed was very disappointed and expected much more from Heather Graham and Natascha McElhone. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): `Mata-me de Prazer' (`Kill me of Pleasure')
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not bad, not great either
mommyplum13 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This isn't a terrible film, it's just not really noteworthy in any way. It sort of reminds me of a made for cable movie that you'd find diverting enough to watch in bed on a rainy afternoon relaxing. Fiennes plays a mysterious mountain climber and public figure named Adam that Alice (Graham) starts a whirlwind, passionate affair with and then makes a hasty marriage to him. Then she starts getting anonymous missives of an increasingly alarming nature telling her she's in danger from her new husband. The chemistry is palpable between the leads and the sense of danger is very Hitchcockian, but I early on guessed, of course, the husband isn't the villain. Eventually it is revealed his seemingly uber cool sister, Deborah, has been dispatching her brother's romantic interests one way or another for some time (scaring some off, causing some to disappear and even causing one to die in an accident she orchestrated) while he had no idea. Her motive for the madness is based on a brief time they had an incestuous sexual relationship as teens. She eventually tries to kidnap Alice after revealing the body of one of her brother's ex girlfriends (who she, Deborah, murdered), is stopped by Adam and then killed by Alice in the struggle. Inexplicably, Adam is enraged at his wife following the ordeal and divorces her, the two only seeing each other accidentally one other time years later in passing and don't speak. Frankly, I couldn't understand Adam's rage and complete ghosting of a wife he claimed to be insanely in love with when he could plainly see his sister's madness and relentless secret manipulations caused the whole thing AND he played a part, too, by never being completely candid with Alice. I mean, when Alice runs to the police, barefoot, in the middle of the night thinking Adam might attack her (based on an anonymous, fabricated communique by Deborah), Adam is seen to be profoundly worried about her being out in the cold. Then she almost dies at the hands of his insane sister a short time later and he just shrugs and walks away from the marriage without a qualm? Shaky plotting.

The intimate scenes are highly charged, but once you get to the end and realize all the heat amounted to nothing but being the victim of an attempted murder and sadness for Alice, it's all kind of a waste of time.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Damn Sexy!
dorkmeisterkool5 November 2003
This movie was sexy, yet a little disturbing.

Heather Graham portrays an American who recently moved to London. She has a nice, safe relationship with her boyfriend, an Englishman who is very reliable. You can tell that they are both comfortable with each other, but because of that their romance has died off and has made things quite boring. One day, she encounters Adam, a mysterious man on the street. The looks they give each other are lustful and very intense. What chemistry! The looks itself were sexy and erotic! And can I just say...Joseph Fiennes is one helluva sexy man! Oh my goodness! He can play the hopeless romantic in Shakespeare in Love and the dangerous rugged type in this film.

Well anyway...they get involved in a very obssessive, sexual relationship. They get right down to business...the scenes are like whoa! Sexy Sexy Sexy! Eventually, all the lust turns into love. However, they know very little about each other which drives Graham's character, Alice, mad. Unexpected secrets are revealed...and believe me! they BIG secrets...which starts to crumble their affair.

I liked this movie a lot! It's not Oscar worthy...but its worth your time. This movie has a lot to offer...romance, sex, lust, drama, thrill, and most of all...entertainment!
70 out of 106 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
disappointing but stylish
ozymandiaskingofkings11 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The main trouble with this erotic thriller is that while it is quite erotic, it is not as thrilling as it should be. The main reason for this is the clichéd narrative, which retreads the old "is my husband a murderer" plot line that has been going on ever since Charles Perault's "Bluebeard"(there is even a scene with a forbidden locked cupboard). The film thinks it is rewriting the film language of classical noir but fails to do so as effectively as say "Basic Instinct" or the Wachowski brother's "Bound".

The themes of obsessive and dangerous love are also familiar from classic thrillers such as "Rebecca" and "Vertigo", with some scenes resonant of these earlier films (e.g. a party scene where she puts on his ex's necklace, a scene in which she discovers she has been made to replicate a photo of his dead girlfriend), but is here is represented both less stylishly and less coherently than in the films of the master.

One way in which the film is successful is through its depiction of sexual power games to emphasise the cat and mouse nature of the marriage, with the bondage scene in particular emphasising the domination that Adam (Joseph Fiennes) has over Alice (Heather Graham). The chemistry between the two leads is also better than many critics have stated and although Graham's acting seems a little wooden at times, Fiennes is generally quite good, as is Natasha McElhone as his slightly unhinged sister but the scenario and dialogue they are given is somewhat weak.

The direction is generally pretty good with Chinese 5th generation director Chen Kaige (who honed his skills on superior East Asian melodrama "Temptress Moon") producing an aesthetic that recalls that of Hitchcock with flashes of distinctive colour (reds and blues) bleeding into a stylised version of London. However, he fails to do this as successfully as other Hitchcock imitators such as M. Night Shyamalan or specifically Brian De Palma, who can produce films that are great in their own right (e.g. "Scarface", "the Untouchables", "Carrie", "Snake Eyes", "Raising Cain" etc.).

In conclusion, while the film has an interesting aesthetic flair, but is let down by substandard plotting and characterisation. I'm sure Kaige could have done better if armed with a better script but the film as it is, while reasonably entertaining, fails to achieve the same innovation that other sex driven neo noirs such as "The Last Seduction" or "Bound" do.

2.7/5
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Killing Us All Slowly
PaulLondon27 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I think the first point to be made is that there is just something wrong with self-proclaimed "erotic thrillers". They always seem to feature characters who investigate their sexuality beyond the missionary position and therefore are signified as selfish, perverse and fated by lazy scriptwriters. Killing Me Softly is no exception.

Heather Graham plays Alice, a woman who leaves her fiancee after a quick shag with a smouldering stranger. Before you can say "This isn't a patch on 'Last Tango In Paris'" he is taking goldfish out of their bowls to demonstrate the effect of high altitude on mountaineers (and symbolically to hint at his cruelty and Alice being a fish out of water). But that not all! Oh no...on their very wedding day he is photographing the poor dear nude....in a (oh the sacrilege of these wanton libertines!) churchyard before making her stomp after him on day long hike so they can have another shag ( SPOILER....erotic asphyxiation is involved here)

Throughout it all Fiennes glowers and sits around smoking moodily while Heather Graham gives it her best 'American innocent in decadent Europe' performance. Its hard to tell whether director Chen Kaige actually bothered to turn up - possibly too busy wondering how badly this would affect his career. At the end of the day though the real villain of this piece has to be the scriptwriter and the author of the ludicrous source material - no cliche is avoided and heavy handed symbolism is thrown around with the carefree abandon of of a 15 year olds creative writing lesson.

In its favour though the camera work is lovely and captures the essence of London without resorting to a montage of Buckingham Palace,Tower Bridge and a few Pearly kings and queens etc (I bet the writers are disappointed that they hadn't written one in though!) Theres little else to be said in its favour really. It isn't one of the worst films I've ever seen but one that takes itself so seriously its hard to supress the giggles until the boredom begins to set in
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed