My Husband My Killer (TV Movie 2001) Poster

(2001 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The murder of Megan Kalajzich
petershelleyau9 March 2003
Director Peter Andrikidis' experience in making television is evident in this Australian made-for-TV movie based on a real life crime story, but this isn't a good thing, since it plays like an episode of a police series. Subtlety isn't much in evidence here, and because of this bias, our empathy naturally goes to the guilty person whom we are supposed to want caught.

Based on the book of the same title by Sandra Harvey and Lindsay Simpson, the teleplay raises some interesting aspects in the Croatian heritage of Kalajzich, now living in the Australian waterside suburb of Manly, where Andrew is the manager of a 5 star international hotel. The treatment claims that the Kalajzich marriage is a loveless one, with Andrew entertaining a major affair with his secretary, Marlene Watson (Lucy Bell). Murder is favored over divorce as the family considers divorce is `shameful' and murder is more cost effective, with an assumption that Megan would demand half of her husband's assets in a settlement. However, the title is also a misnomer, since Megan remains a cipher, and the narrative is mostly the police's point of view. Whilst the Kalajzich's family grief is presented as laughable silent meals, the teleplay also includes the domestic life of Detective Bob 'Snake' Inkster (Colin Friels) presumably in contrast, with Inkster's wife even contributing some strategic advice.

The crime itself is easily solved. The hard part is gathering evidence against Andrew as the mastermind, which includes the legally dubious act of mail theft for information. Inkster's listening abilities are also in question when he is given the love letters Andrew wrote to another woman, and he reads them in narration while the women is still speaking to him! However, the teleplay does feature one witticism in a parallel in obviousness made with `Has Rose Kennedy got a black dress?'.

Whilst Andrikidis uses the cliches of slow motion, hand-held and creeping camera-work for police interviews, flashes and drained color for flashbacks, and portentous music by composer Peter Best, he does manage the miracle of allowing David Field as the hitman Bill Vandenburg to give an understated performance. And concluding cross-cutting between the police coming to arrest Andrew and Andrew leaving his house, also includes flash-forwards to Bill hanging himself in prison. Regrettably, Linda Cropper is wasted as Megan, Martin Sacks as Andrew hardly speaks, but Craig McLachlan uses surprising tears for a confession. Friels, who worked with Andrikidis on the TV series Water Rats (yes, about cops), adds some gravitas to the role of Inkster, particularly with his direct gaze.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
True Crime
pippa-4025 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I have seen My Husband My Killer which is based on the book of the same name which was written in about 1990. One of the authors, Sandra Harvey has close links with the police and is therefore very biased in her approach to the story.

I wrote another book on this same murder, called Doubt & Conviction. It was written after the Inquiry into Andrew Kalajzich's conviction, which I attended in 1993-1994. After this I devoted eight years to researching the crime, got access to documents and interviewed key players in this awful murder - including Andrew Kalajzich in prison. I give readers the opportunity to decide for themselves whether or not this man is guilty, by presenting both sides to the story.

It's amazing that people can be confused about whether or not this is a real murder after seeing the movie - because it is made primarily for entertainment and does not stick very closely to the facts. I get very upset by this as the producers are virtually rewriting history. This is why I give this movie a thumbs down.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A great made-for-TV crime-thriller
TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews2 June 2004
I did have my doubts when I sat down to see this, as I have had nothing but bad luck with made-for-TV crime-thriller, as they are usually high on cliches and have very bad, totally predictable plots. I was pleasantly surprised to see so much humor and style in a TV-movie. It does have some cliches, but the film definitely makes up for it by being incredibly well-made, at least for a TV-movie. Though the plot is a little predictable, it has a good amount of twists and it keeps your interest throughout the entire run-time; I certainly never lost interest in it, or got bored by it. The plot is good, a little predictable, but never dull. The acting is pretty good, most of the actors pull off great performances. The characters are well-written and credible. I don't know if this film is based on a true story, it had a sort of authentic 'feel' to it. I like the way the director did the flashback sequences, his use of slow-motion, especially near the end. The humor of the film was also great; the cops had a believable 'tough guy' humor. All in all, the film is definitely one of the best of the made-for-TV crime-thrillers I've seen. I recommend it to fans of crime-thrillers, and murder mysteries. 8/10
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A brilliant thriller which is a true story.
zemmost-14 May 2003
I thought this film was fantastic. An intelligent script, brilliantly directed with realistic performances. This is a thoughtful piece which doesn't bombard you with an opinion. This film treats the audience with intelligence. This is a brilliant thriller which

happens to be a true story. 9/10
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed