Startup.com (2001) Poster

(2001)

User Reviews

Review this title
68 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
On the whole, a solid, respectable fairly fulfilling though uninsightful piece of journalism.
AnonII16 May 2001
Actually, to correct the plot outline above this movie does NOT "trace the birth and success...of new media company govWorks.com." Rather, it douments the rise and fall of a company whose fortunes seem to accurately reflect the demise of 1000s of similar dotcom start-ups. I saw the video on tape and not in a theater and thought the lack of art and panache in the news-like cinema verite photography was disappointing, but the story does deliver. The relationship between the protagonists--then antagonists--who founded and ran govWorks.com makes for compelling viewing and substantial response even weeks after the story-telling. The docu relies on the screen-filling charisma and intelligence of Kaleil Tuzman, CEO of the start-up company guarantees to drive the narrative. His former roommate Jehane Noujaim produced, directed and shot the feature doc with veteran Chris Hegedus, but it would not have been possible w/out Noujaim's access to the primary subject, Tuzman.

Interestingly, feature stories and reviews in the NY media describe Tuzmnan as both Hindu and as a "Latino Jew." It's exactly the type of detail missing in a doc that does not rely on narration to fill in the blanks.

On the whole, a solid, respectable fairly fulfilling though uninsightful piece of journalism.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
You can't script drama this good
antony-123 December 2007
This is an excellent, compelling look into a time that seems so alien and so far away now. The days when there was so much money being invested into promises, and how the dot com bubble burst and took so much with it.

Even though we now know where the story ends, the documentary is gripping from start to finish. It charts the venture from the inception through to its demise, although it focuses more on the early stages. I was part of a dot com venture and it really brought back the memories of "everything is impossible, we are unstoppable" that was pushed by those that run the ventures. And in the case of govworks.com, the gorgeous and charismatic CEO even met Clinton. How could it all go wrong? The documentary also charts, in fact in particular charts, the effect of the company on the personal relationships of those involved. Some of the agonies they face are better than stories you see in scripted dramas, and because they are so real they are very involving.

It's a shame that the latter stage's of the company's demise are skipped over, we cut from them having over 200 employees to just 50 with no real explanation on what happened in between. Maybe it wasn't really required, maybe they didn't want to be filmed, but it felt like a bit of a hole. It's the only real complaint about the documentary however.

Overall it accomplished showing us the birth and death of a dot com very well, and how it affects those involved. And anyone who watches the documentary will probably like me go to www.govworks.com and with sadness see that the domain is owned by one of those companies that registers dead domains, and feel such a sadness that all that blood, sweat and tears ended this way.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
You get it even more if you were there
smakawhat2 April 2003
I think the greatest thing about this film is how it really shows the audience the future while the people in the film have no idea what is coming around the corner.

We get a real sense of what is to come early on when Tuzman comes back from a meeting trying to raise capital. He bitches about how he got ripped to shreds by one investor (you have no project experience etc... etc..). It's a very telling sign.

and it is amazing to watch how Tuzman was duplicated over and over again by several people who just threw money at a phenomenon without understanding it. It was an amazing thing to witness and Startup.Com captures it like nothing I have ever seen before.

Add in some dramatic moments, an office break in, a missing lawyer, a ruthless competitor, and a telling firing.. and startup.com is one documentary that will engage you.

Rating 8 out of 10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
On-Line train wreck.
ken.phillips19 December 2002
Those who are commenting on the mediocrity of the craftmanship of this movie are missing the point. The rise and fall of the dot-coms have become a meaningful part of American history and lore. Stock tickers, balance sheets and bankruptcy sales tell part of the story, but there's a difference between arriving at the scene of a train wreck and actually watching it happen.

The value of this movie is that, in spite of all of its flaws, you get to watch the train wreck knowing full well what's going to come, you can see why the principals didn't see the things that seem so obvious to us watching the film now, and you can see how their hubris, lack of technical understanding and lack of focus lead to their downfall.

I'm sure that it could been a better movie, but it's the only behind the scenes account we have of what must have happened hundreds of times all over the country. Like the Zapruder film and Hanlon & Naudet's account of 9/11, it's value comes from the fact that the cameras were there, catching history as it happened.

This movie should be required viewing for all B-School students, sort of like making student drivers watch Red Asphalt.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Startup.com captures reaction, not explanation.
cpto3 October 2001
Cinéma-vérité is difficult. Telling a story by capturing reactions requires extensive filming, tight editing, and a clear sense of the documentary's purpose.

Unfortunately, I found the sense of purpose lacking in startup.com. I understand that you often don't know where you're going when you start, but still, if the documentary is to work, the viewer must be able to follow the events and relate through them to the subjects.

The beginning, rise, and eventual fall of govWorks happened. But I have no idea which events were key in any of these phases. Perhaps the story was too complex to tell without stepping outside the cinéma-vérité format for some explanation of events. Still, that is the director's and editor's responsibility, not mine as a viewer.

Startup.com is a good movie if you want to see two old friends talk and argue with one another about the company they're trying to build. But if you're trying to learn the facts behind the rise and fall, you'll wonder where the "meat" of the story is.

Startup.com is worth watching when it comes on cable. However, I think you'd be better off spending the price of the DVD on any number of books at your local bookseller.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great movie, but you either love it or are confused by it
billfrancis200013 January 2005
I myself worked in one of the ubiquitous .com's in the late 90's and this movie is frightening realistic, from the long hours and technical glitches right down to the embarrassingly lame cheers.

I read on the web the filmmakers set out to document their friends impending wealth and business fortune with this documentary, but what they got was the complete opposite. I think that speaks volumes for expectations during this era.

I feel like some of the other IMDb reviews are off the mark. Yes, the movie is sometimes hard to follow. But it was shot in the Cinéma-vérité genre and that is to be expected. It is an uncompromising real life look, and it is up to the viewer to decipher; sometimes this works sometimes not. Some previous reviews wondered how the company folded. Honestly its a movie about an internet company, why do you think it failed? Having said this, I think more could have been shown of why Tom got the axe and the love relationships of Kaliel could have been better developed.

According to the DVD the producers cut some realistic (and boringly technical) scenes to focus more on the relationship between Tom and Kaleil. This is where they succeeded. They are trying to tell the story of the company downfall through the interplay of these two characters. It is fascinating because it is real. The most compelling part is the coorelation between their relationship eroding as does the company. Viewed from that point of view this movie is really not a documentary. Nevertheless it is entertaining and gripping. What amazed me was the unfettered greed and their enormous hubris which prevented them from acknowledge their role in this sinking ship.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Involving Dot.Com But Leaves a Lot Of Questions Unanswered
noralee28 October 2005
"Start-up.com" is a really involving documentary, a dot-com story brought to life with real lives and real people.

It was particularly astonishing how interesting it is as I'd just finished watching the 10 episode fictional mini-series on BBCAmerica that covers the same ground, "Attachments" and the non-fiction version mostly holds up as entertainment as well.

Where it doesn't is intrinsic in the D.A. Pennebaker-produced techniques -- how much of what we see can stand alone as fact and how much is interpretively selected by the filmmakers? And how much of what we see is influenced by whom was the most comfortable with the filmmakers' constant presence, or who was the most verbal when the cameras are around?

Clearly, the central figure CEO gave the filmmakers (one of whom was an old college friend) the most access, so we get a lot on him, and even some glimpses at his personal life. Was govworks.com Achilles heel insufficient attention to the actual web site functioning or were geeks less interesting to the filmmakers than the deal making CEO's?

The fictional version was very careful to contrast the types. A compromise technique is the one "Real World" takes where we see (somewhat phony, somewhat staged) action unfold and then have the participants face the camera to explain themselves.

But the context here is missing for the geeks working on the project (which "Attachments" is sensitive to) as opposed to the brash, camera-charming entrepreneurs.

(originally written 7/8/2001)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Reality TV during the "dot com" era ... Fascinating.
Vic_max26 January 2008
If you've ever wondered what it's like to be in a startup company, this movie is a must-see. Although you don't quite see everything or understand everything - you do get a glimpse of the amazing real-life drama that occurred during the startup phase of this company. It's probably pretty representative of a lot of "dot-com" era companies.

This is a documentary that follows the two young entrepreneurs that founded "govworks.com" in 1999. It follows them from 8 employees to over 200 and loosely chronicles the personal drama that unfolds.

You won't see the business plan or much in the way of strategic meetings, but you will get some semblance of what life was like from the founders' perspective.

It's more like reality TV than a documentary because there is no commentary. It's just footage of the ongoing lives of the founders as they struggle through the startup phase of what looks to be a huge future company. Like much of reality TV, it's simply fascinating to watch. Highly recommended viewing - especially for anyone who's thinking of starting a company.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Could had used some more focus.
Boba_Fett113827 October 2010
Main problem I had what this documentary was that it didn't really ever focus truly on anything. It doesn't go into depth with anything. It could had easily put some more focus on its subject, starting a dot com company, or more on the 2 main founders of it.

The documentary really doesn't explain thoroughly what the entire idea and functionality behind govWorks.com was. So the viewers are being pretty much clueless at what the creators of this website are actually trying to achieve and how they think that they can rule the market with their one idea and concept. It's therefore hard to truly distinctive for the viewers what they were doing right and what they did wrong with their concept.

It also doesn't help much that none of the key persons in this documentary very rarely recapitulate or explain anything into the camera. We don't get to see why they made certain choices or even how the website got developed or marketed. or why certain people had to leave the company because they weren't considered suitable enough for the job. Apparently this got shot over the course of about 2 years but the movie is being told and cut in such a way that it actually feels like a couple of weeks. Seems to me that the camera only showed up once for a day every two weeks, or only when a special event or important day got planned. So to me the documentary just doesn't feel like a natural and well flowing whole because too much stuff and time got omitted and it was lacking in focus or detail.

Perhaps this all could had been saved and more interesting if the two main founders were presented as some more interesting individuals as well. They now instead more come across as two inexperienced young guys who have plenty of ambition but are pretty much clueless at what they are getting themselves involved with and the movie really doesn't focus enough on their characters at who they are and what is driving them. Because of this you are not really feeling at all involved with any of them, or their dreams and goals.

It probably sounds as if I hated this documentary but this is far from the truth really. It still remains a good watch because it still has a good subject and it's always fun and interesting to see other people working hard and dealing with all kinds of ups and downs. And there is plenty happening in this documentary, I only wish it all got presented a bit better.

A good enough watch all but it still remains a real missed opportunity, that had far more potential in it.

7/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Best movie I have see in a while
rev4bart10 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
If you like movies like Boiler Room, your going to love this movie!!! This movie has it all..it takes you through a personal journey of the founders of govworks to the ultimate demise during the Internet roller coaster of the 90's.

What makes this movie standout and better than other similar internet documentaries (i.e. e-Dreams) is that this actually includes some interesting drama and feels like you are watching reality TV at times. But what makes this better is that you have a quick business lesson going on in the background (i.e. venture capital, designing/testing the web site) The only negative is that I would of liked to see more of the techy stuff behind the scenes and if the scenes were a little better explained of what was going on (after watching it 2x, you will get most of it)..but I would of liked to know what really caused their demise or how much better and why was their competitor sites better?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A year in the life of a dot bomb
rparham23 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The late '90s dot com boom was a time where young men quit jobs, hooked up with friends, started business and, hopefully, got rich. Most of those guys came crashing down as this era of business proved to be nothing but a wild spending spree, where advertising, pretty offices and boasting as to how much capital someone had raised from venture capitalists was commonplace. Startup.com is a documentary that records one company from this era, govworks.com, that started with a handful of friends, grew in size quickly and then collapsed as many others would. Along the way, girlfriends come and go, friendships are strained, software bugs emerge and are quashed, and people come out at the end with little in their pockets.

Startup.com begins when Kaleil Iszaza Tuzman quits his job with Goldman Sachs to become CEO of the then unnamed govworks.com. The company is the brainchild of Kaleil and Tom Herman, who have known each other since high school. They are determined to create a website that will allow individuals to easily interact with their local governments to do such things as pay parking tickets (their principal focus). As Kaleil first joins the venture, it becomes obvious that he is a driven and very strong individual; at one point he wants to name the site "untocesear.com". Tom is a much softer-spoken individual, trying to keep everybody happy and deal with problems. Tom is the technical brains and Kaleil is the money go to guy.

We watch as Kaleil begins making the rounds of venture capitalists, trying to raise the funds to pay for their operation until they can reach their IPO and start seeing some cash influx. He enters into meetings the purpose of which is for companies to hand over millions of dollars all on the speculation that it will pay off in the future. It is here that first possible chinks in the armor of the two friends emerge: Tom starts mentioning ideas in meetings that Kaleil doesn't want to pitch to the investors, and quickly becomes frustrated with his inability to stay on message. Kaliel knows they have to pitch exactly what they want, not a bunch of interesting ideas, but Tom doesn't immediately think the same.

Startup.com unfolds in footage that is shot in a variety of locations, often in cars as individuals race from one meeting to another, and we are presented at one point with a montage of scenes of people walking into and out of buildings, rushing to catch planes, trying their best to rub elbows with big money. You get the distinct impression that the biggest part of this world is showing up to put your hand out and say "Please." Then comes the first major hurdle: a third founder, a co-worker of Kaleil's from Goldman Sachs decides that the risk of the venture is too much, and he wants out, but not without a compensation of $800,000 dollars. They deal with it as best they can and move on.

Startup.com is, in many ways, less a story about a business than about what happens when you go into business with people you know and like and quickly find that business doesn't always allow you to deal with your friend as a friend, but as a business associate. Aside from the capital raising, Startup.com doesn't really give you a good indication of what it is like to run an internet business. In some ways, this isn't necessarily a fault, because it is easy to imagine that a bunch of people huddled around computers staring at screens filled with indecipherable code is probably not to exciting to watch. Even so, as the film marches on, and the months pass as the site is readied, it is difficult to completely grasp all the issues involved in the technical aspects of the company.

The film's major drama really hits when Tom and Kaleil begin having a falling out. Kaleil thinks Tom doesn't have the technical knowledge to really run that aspect of the business, and is also becoming frustrated that Tom wants to be considered a co-CEO and doesn't respect Kaleil's authority. It eventually leads to terse meetings and a letter dismissing Tom from his duties and then the ever famous scenes where a fired employee is escorted out of the building by security. It is somewhat difficult to watch some of these scenes as the individuals involved must fight the pain and hurt of putting their friendship through this wringer.

Startup.com also doesn't really do a spectacular job of showing the company's final days, as the film jump cuts over six months to a single line from Kaleil that reveals that the company is out of money and being sold. Again, despite the desire to show a startup dot com business, the business is sometimes what directors Jehane Noujaim and Chris Hegedus seem least interested in. Despite that, Startup.com is still an interesting look at a brief but fascinating time in these peoples lives and proves enjoyable.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A documentary?
chullvk1320 April 2002
While watching this film, I was in disbelief at how perfectly the filmmakers seemed to capture the most pivotal moments of the rise and fall of this startup company. At many points, it seemed so perfect that I suspected that this whole movie was scripted out. No, I don't really believe that's the case, but I say that as a compliment to the filmmakers' ability to be in the right place at the right time, and their editing work.

I think there seems to be some confusion as to the point and relevance of this film. If this film is simply a documentary, I agree that it doesn't do a very good job in that respect because it's neither factual or informative. However, I don't consider this film a documentary. This film feels like a typical feature film, except that it's REAL, which makes it so much more incredible and compelling. It's about people and relationships, not about websites or business plans. Watching the characters develop and seeing the relationships unravel is fascinating.

Sure, it may be hard to relate to the main characters, and you may not find a movie about people starting a business very interesting, but then why the heck would you watch a movie called Startup.com?

As someone who is interested in such matters and has even been part of a couple of other failed startups, I give this movie a 9/10.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good, but With Some Flaws
bosochima9 October 2001
Right now, this is the definitive documentary on the dot.com culture

that essentially ceased to exist so many months ago. I feel there are

two ways the film could have been improved. First, the producers should

have added subtitles to indicate where the protagonists are in the film.

Pretty much all offices look the same, and it would have been nice to

know when the two were at their place, at the consultants' offices, at

the venture capitalists', etc. It would have been helpful to put names

to the numerous faces that come in and out of the picture as well.

In addition, and more importantly, the film never gets into the

specifics of why GovWorks.com failed. One day the company had two

employees, then they had seventy, then they had ten. Why? What was the

business plan? What were the goals of the company? What did the Web site

look like? I think the story of how this business worked (or didn't

work) is at least as interesting as the personal tensions between the

two main characters. When they release the DVD of this film an ideal

second disk would consist of additional information along these lines,

as well as a mock-up of the GovWorks site.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not the documentary for me...
His Girl Friday13 September 2001
To each his own, of course, but I could not make myself interested in the ups and downs of starting a new dot com. I did not find all the talk about venture capital, strategic moves or group meetings compelling in the least. Perhaps I've been spoiled by watching one too many Maysles brothers docos, which always seem to pull back the curtain on the human condition. But after the third instance of someone screaming into a phone at a business partner, I tuned out. A film certainly for those in the business or tech world, a slight turn-off for the rest of us.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting lessons in the Dotcom world.
timmauk19 July 2002
I have friends who either work for or own a Dotcom company. So many fail, but they keep going at it. For those who make it, life can be sweet. It use to be a world where everyone can make it until the NASDAC fell apart.

This film by former MTVers, is a slick and glossy look at a rise and fall of a Dotcom company. We follow two high school buddies (Kaleil and Tom) from their coming up with a name and idea for their site to their breakup and demise. The emotions are all there, from elation to despair. You are there for everything. Though the film has no narration you can still tell what is going on if you pay attention.

This is an interesting piece of life in the late 20th century. You'll think about these guys the next time you go cruising through the internet. If you see it, rent it.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What the chaps are doing now
arvy13 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
If you are interested, this is what these boys are doing now.

Not convinced they have ever actually achieved anything, but the film is nevertheless interesting for the first 2/3s of the show.

It follows the team raising money, hiring people, firing some others and getting swept up in the bubble of 99-2000.

It would have been better to see the new CEO takeover and the machinations involved here as the demise that is shown is a purely personal one, and I would be interested in see what they thought about it after the event. Clearly Tom and Khalil work together (see below)

http://www.recognitiongroup.com/articles.php?post=74 http://www.recognitiongroup.com/about_us.php?sub=2
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
somewhat sloppy but fascinating
vincent-2718 September 2002
Speaking from an internet programmer who lived through the whole .dot com craze, this movie is a pretty good documentation of that insane period in our history. I lived through VC pitches, trying to get funding, frenzied developing and all the ludicrous amounts of money being thrown around.

A lot of people complained that not enough was explained, especially the technical details, well if you get the DVD, the directors explain that they wanted to show more of that stuff, but it wasn't "sexy" enough as the drama of trying to raise millions of dollars and run a company while interpersonal relationships collapse. The rest of the information is there, but is merely a backdrop to the important events transpiring. I think renting the DVD is essential for understanding movie, the commentary explains quite a bit, especially little details about how the whole technical team was from a company called Sapient, and that many of the confusing story lines (like with Ki, the guy they bought out) were extremely complex and difficult to capture in a clear way. To be fair, when you are filming a documentary, you are the wim of fate and whatever you happen to capture, quite often there is so much going on, you can't capture it all. Having said that, the suggestion of providing subtitles for different characters is a good one. Also, more post explaining by Tom and Kaleil would have been good. Of course, they were all probably too busy for that!

The movie showed a lot of the problems of a startup, problems I have witnessed first hand, shows the root causes of the failures pretty well if you look hard enough. Tom didn't really know anything and was hardly qualified as CTO. Kaleil was a very good speaker and motivator and seemed to know all the business lingo, but did he really know what the hell he was doing? In all fairness to Tom, as incompetent as he appeared, I can speak from experience that the most sure-fire way for a software project to fail is keep changing the specifications and functionality. That kind of stuff drives developers CRAZY.

One thing I kept wondering throughout this film is how these two people were such good friends in the first place, Tom is obviously a very liberal, new-age kind of guy (although his flakiness drove me nuts) whereas Kaleil is your standard Type-A go-getter, extremely driven and obsessed with avoiding failure.

Again and again I have been amazed at how documentaries capture events which are so dramatic they seem scripted and yet are not. Someone decides to make a documentary, they don't know what's going to happen, could these filmmakers have predicted that the whole internet dot.com craze would have collapsed right before their eyes? The movie "Dark Days" is probably the most extreme and incredible example of this.

In the end, the whole thing is rather confusing and warrants several repeat viewings to understand what is truly going on, and knowing something about the industry is definetly helpful, but still it's a fascinating documentation of a crazy time period.

I especially like the ending, the dog chasing the bone, apt considering they were all dogs chasing the bone of the american dream.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not enough technical viewpoint.
mark-41427 October 2002
You can't say much about the plot of this docu-drama since it *IS* an accounting of real life. I'm actually amazed by how much they showed. Unless they went back and re-inacted some of the scenes, they must have expected their story to be special.

I think that this movie would have been better if it would have been more technical. Since it is about an internet company.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Start This One Up!
meeza6 November 2001
No! This film is not a Rolling Stones Internet concert film. Startup.com is a documentary about a dot-com startup business entitled Govworks.com. It entails its promising optimistic beginnings to its catastrophic pessimistic conclusions. Some of the major `hits' of this documentary includes its focus on: the fine line between personal friendship & business betrayal, the ambiance of a motivated workplace, and its give-it-all-you-got & life-must-go-on analytical futuristic outlooks. However, the main `protocol' that was the most appealing was the relationship between start-uppers Kaleed and Tom. I hope more documentary filmmakers get `linked ` on to the idea of making films on startup businesses. It would be an effective educational tool that should be further `explored' and should not be `netscaped' by corporate america. So `bookmark' this review, and get your dvd `loaded-down' with Startup.com. **** Good
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
$65m is alot of money just to pay parking tickets
conannz14 July 2001
This doco is very funny. It was edited down from 400 hrs of video. Actually it might be the kind of thing they show in schools to illustrate what happens when you spend all your time chasing money and not working on a better mousetrap.

There was a short scene just before the site went live where it became apparent that the design and structures of the project site weren't up to much. On the whole though the film is played for laughs.

Best bit is when CEO gives Bill Clinton a card. Bizarre but entirely believeable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent Documentary
act196623 May 2001
I encourage everyone who has any inkling of what the dot.com era in economic history was about to see this film.

One of the more important aspects the doc illustrates is the length some people will go to make money - compromising personal relationships and integrity all to make a buck.

Being involved in an industry like technology, I thought the raw portrayal of the start up phenomenon caught exactly what was right and what was wrong with this whole collision of technology meeting money.

An interesting documentary but, more importantly, an important warning.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Startup.com: Where's the Beef?
geohaber-216 September 2006
This film is a good first step in chronicling the rise and fall of a hot dot.com business. Left unrevealed, as many other viewers have commented, is a more insightful look at what the business was all about, what the challenges were in marketing it, how the business expected to make money, and exactly how it rose and fell. Nothing is mentioned about the problems of recruiting talent, pitching prospects, or confronting competition which, apparently, was the cause of the govworks downfall. We also would like to know more about the backgrounds of the founders--where did they grow up? What did their parents do? And what's the story behind the daughter of Tom? (Other comments allude to his "gayness" but I didn't feel that was clearly implied...Is it relevant?)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent work with amazingly intimate footage pieced together to preserve the through line and themes. Really good. urto b
dlcoll23 June 2001
This documentary was one of the best I've seen. I was particularly impressed with the filmmakers' ability to get intimate shots of the two main characters talking about each other separately. The two characters' relationship -- the main story of the film -- is inherently interesting from a dramatic perspective because they have known each other since their teen-age years and are both smart, aggressive and goal-oriented but in most other ways (e.g., emotionally), completely different. One (the ex-Goldman guy) is focused, aware of what's going on around him and understands the importance of appearances and playing the game while the other (the more technical guy) is focused on loyalty and less able to change(sort of a classic nerd).

I would love to see the unused footage for this. The filmmakers must have had a helluva time figuring out what to use. But what they have done works structurally and thematically. I will say no more so I don't ruin the story for those of you who haven't seen it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Weird re-watching this in light of conviction
plushing-417-7329258 September 2018
Saw it first maybe ten years ago, found it reasonably entertaining. Decided to watch it again but out of curiosity googled Kaleil to see how he's doing. Here's how he's doing: convicted of heavy fraud crimes in federal court in Manhattan December 2017, sentence now scheduled for October 2018 (he can appeal once he's been sentenced). Sort of like re-watching Smokey and the Bandit, which I did the other day, now that Burt has passed.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Trouble in the Cutting room?
editboy_zero8 January 2002
I'm sure there is a documentary amongst the ruins of this Yawn-fest somewhere, given enough time maybe the producers could find it. I do not connect with any of the characters. This is a problem for a documentary. That disconnection soon festers into a complete animosity bordering on hostility. Although because of the poor story flow, I'm not really sure what is happening to them and what are the consequences of whatever it is they are trying to do. The story and faces jump around so quickly it is very hard to completely understand what is going on. The 3rd founder that takes them for $700K is introduced so late into the film, Khaleil and Tom have to backpaddle (fruitlessly) to explain "oh yeah, this guy created the idea too". And just when I thought I had a slight grasp on who all the tertiary characters were, some crazy woman in ranting about getting a puppy? What's up with that? Also, did Tom really have to give all those awkward speeches to the staff? I can only imagine the boredom they felt when it was really happening. Actually I think I feel for them.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed