Berserker (2004) Poster

(2004)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Okay ingredients but a horrible recipe
MBunge25 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This Highlander-esque action flick is dizzy and confused, like it spent a little too long on the merry-go-round. It's a decent enough idea for a story with a sufficient amount of B-movie fight scenes and naked flesh from the sexy Kari Wuhrer, but it constantly loses track of what it's about and changes its mind at least 7 times on whether a main character is a good guy or a bad guy.

The film starts in olden days with a Viking king (Patrick Bergin) needing the help of his renegade son Boar (Craig Sheffer) to defeat his rival and protect his kingdom. Boar has become the leader of the berserkers, a cannibalistic warrior cult that wears bear skulls as hats. They also hang out with these glowing Valkyries, which writer/director Paul Matthews weirdly confuses with vampires as though he wrote this script with an encyclopedia that had a defective "V" section. Boar agrees to help his father, but only if his brother Barek (Paul Johansson) is forced to join the berserker cult. The king agrees over Barek's objections, then betrays and tries to kill Boar after getting his help in battle. However, Barek pleads with the Norse god Odin to save his brother in exchange for Barek's soul.

The movie then jumps forward over a thousand years to find Barek locked up in a high security mental institution as some sort of insane murderer. The new director of the nuthatch is Anya (Kari Wurher), a woman who feels an instant connection with Barek. Then Boar shows up in full Viking regalia along with a legion of bear-hat wearing berserkers and tries to kill his brother. Barek escapes with Anya and we discover through a series of flashbacks that, in a bad takeoff of the Ring of the Nibelungs, she was a Valkyrie named Brunhilda that came between the brothers in Viking times and ignited their eternal feud. Eventually, Barek and Boar have their big showdown and I can honestly say it doesn't end at all like you would ever expect.

I have to give the folks who made Berserker some credit. They try pretty hard to be a step above the average action flick, both plot wise and in moral complexity. Unfortunately, it's not enough credit to give this film a passing grade. It's simply too muddled, with too many extraneous plot threads and dips far too often into laughable stupidity.

For example, the story goes back and forth repeatedly on the subject of whether Barek and Boar and immortal or are being reincarnated over and over. The movie first implies one and then the other, then switches again and sometimes even seems to imply both at the same time. And whether Boar is immortal or reborn over and over, what the hell is he doing walking around the 21st century in Viking garb with a broadsword on his hip? I mean, I've heard of someone being oblivious to fashion but that's ridiculous. And when some bear-hatted berserkers wander into a night club to draw swords with Barek, it looks absolutely ludicrous.

It's also bizarre how all three main characters arbitrarily switch at least once, and usually more than that, from being a hero to a villain and vice versa. I can almost imagine what writer/director Matthews was going for, but he pulls it off so poorly it's as if when he wrote the script, he would roll an eight-sided die to decide what came next.

Whurer does take her clothes off and looks damn good doing it. She's also a surprisingly capable actress, which makes it sort of a shame she never became much more than a poor man's Carmen Electra. Craig Sheffer is fittingly crazy-eyed as Boar while Paul Johansson is kind of a stiff as Barek, but that's probably because he gets almost nothing to work with. Matthew's direction is also mostly competent, except for some oddly bad moments like when he spends 68 full seconds training the camera on a Viking boat gliding down a stream. That's a very long time to hold on any single shot in a film, especially when it's only a boat going down a stream. Go ahead and time yourself looking at one thing for 68 seconds. It's frickin' forever, isn't it?

Berserker is a plain old misfire. The essentials are there to almost make a good movie, but they're badly mixed together and can never catch fire. Ironically, it's these kind of crappy films that Hollywood should remake instead of taking good movies and giving us a do over of them but I doubt we'll see a future version of this starring Zac Effron, Rupert Grint and Emmy Rossum as the poor man's Anne Hathaway.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Ultra-cheesy
Leofwine_draca9 September 2015
BERSERKER: HELL'S WARRIOR is an ultra-cheesy historical-action-science-fiction B-movie. That's a hell of a combination, and the fact that it was made in South Africa just adds to the whole weirdness of the thing. The DVD case sells this as a straightforward gritty historical war flick along the lines of the VIKINGS TV series but it turns out to be a thoroughly cheesy B-movie masquerading as such.

And, truth be told, it's a pretty poor show. The narrative attempts to invoke some Norse mythology involving Odin and the other gods but in the end this turns into an unholy cross between HIGHLANDER and the Hong Kong flick THE ICEMAN COMETH. The first half which is set in the Viking camp is by far the worst, committing the cardinal sin of being cheesy and boring at the same time, but things do improve a little in the second. Be warned, throughout the movie you'll be exposed to some of the poorest over-acting you'll see in a movie.

We're treated to the spectacle of a couple of warring brothers travelling to the present day where their battles continue. The CGI effects are pretty awful, it has to be said, and you wonder why the likes of Patrick Bergin and Kari Wuhrer are present, although at least the latter disrobes frequently to distract the viewer. There's a little gore thrown into the mix, along with the unwise decision to include some vampire stuff (as if it wasn't enough of a mixed bag to begin with), but overall the extremely poor production values make this one hell of a mess.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Whatever it is, it's not about Vikings...
Enchorde30 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Recap: According to legend, the Valkyrie Brunhilda defied Odin and was chained to a rock surrounded by an eternal fire. Only a warrior pure in heart can pass through the flames, free Brunhilda and release her from Odin's claim, and have her for himself. Now, war is brewing in the Norse lands, and the King needs an alliance with the Berserkers. The Berserkers are warriors claimed by Odin's valkyries, lusting for war, blood and flesh, and therefore outcasts, but superior in battle. The leader of the Berserkers is a scorned son of the King, Boar, and his price for the alliance is his brother, the future king, Barek. But after the King is victorious in battle, he refuses to give up his only remaining son, breaking his oath to Boar and betray him and kill him. Boar is saved only by Barek's call upon Odin. But this is only the start of the battle between the brothers, and their final battle is about to start now, a millennia later...

Comments: I had hopes that this would be a movie based upon some Viking ground, far too little quality movie about Viking has been done. It started out very good too, with detailed longships and armors, nice and fitting sceneries and an OK battle.

The foundation in the Aesir myths is thin and seems very corrupted to me. Odin is much more vengeful, spiteful and absent than I remind him from school, and the valkyries has been turned into some vampire-demons. I'm no expert, but that seems outright wrong.

But the fatal mistake made by this movie is to move the time-setting from the original time-period to today. If the two brothers had fought it out in the correct time, with some decent battles, this movie would have been much better. Now the setting, suddenly is changed to present day Stockholm. Still, Odin is present and is sending Boar and his berserkers for Brunhilda and Barek which gives silly scenes when armor-clad and painted berserkers swordfights with Barek among the industries. Beautiful mountains and woods have been exchanged for cement. And when allowed to focus upon single fights, instead of massive battles as in the beginning, I quickly saw that the fights and skills of the actors are slow and clumsy.

The end result is thin story, sometimes hard to follow and other times just silly, and the only that could save it, the action, is drawn from slow, dull and clumsy swordfights. It draws very little from Aesir myth or Viking tradition. Thus both story and action fails, and the movie is just plain bad.

Finally, as a Swede, this movie is a little confusing. Supposedly filmed entirely in South Africa, it still contains some familiar Swedish signs, plates and what seems to be an authentic police car. However, the effort is poor and only goes so far, as to really set it in Sweden. No names are Swedish (perhaps with Anya as the exception), no familiar sceneries are Swedish, they (supposedly) speak a little (ancient?) Norwegian, not Swedish. And uniforms, both police and medical, are clearly not Swedish. If they were not going to even try to do it correctly - and really give the illusion that it is set in Sweden, why bother at all?

4/10
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
From within
shamashie3 June 2005
I was an extra in the opening scene where the combined forces storm Eric the Red's encampment. Never knew where to see the final product. Then stumbled upon it on Cinemax one night. Needless to say that I can't be seen, anywhere (I was just filler in a war scene, anyway).

Didn't expect too much going into the film, but things look better when they are on the screen than they look in real-life. The story wasn't as basic as it had sounded and their were some nice twists in the ending. I'm glad to see it wasn't a "straight forward Hollywood finish". Rest assured that Paul Johanssen is a total tool (cheesy sense of humor).

Impressed with the final thing, but only cause it exceeded my low expectation.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Rifftrax vs Oden
heyletsbuyhappiness17 March 2019
Watching the Rifftrax version should be the ONLY possible excuse for seeing this and the only reason it gets any stars 😂
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worst/Best movie ever
apefoot24 September 2004
Let's begin by stating that this movie is absolutely god-awful.

That said, I thoroughly enjoyed watching it. There is something to be said for the comedy of an insanely horrible movie. The plot? Nonsensical. The acting? Melodramatic/pornographic. The list goes on. But this doesn't change the fact that bad movies are funny.

I almost want to compare it to "Young Van Helsing", but this movie is even sadder because it's clear that some amount of money was spent on it, and someone thought it was a serious film effort, whereas with YVH, the budget's about $50, and I can't be sure it's meant to be serious.

Anyway, don't watch this movie alone, but with friends it's a great time to make fun of.
19 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst movies I have ever seen.... still 'great' though
DiiJay24 May 2004
This movie sucks from beginning till (especially) the end. You probably don't get 'm any worse, acting, storyline ,photography, camera work, etcetera it's all bad, very, very bad.

But that's what makes it a 'great' watch, it will give you more than enough good laughs. The worse, the better!

I really have no clue what so ever of what these people were thinking making this movie. A serious viking movie? The story is goddamn ridiculous, it's more like a comedy in disguise, kinda like Mafia, also pointless but damn funny.

And look out for the very very end of the movie... uhum.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Are there ANY good Viking movies?
nyspooky8 December 2005
I had no background knowledge of this movie before I bought it, but it sounded cool and I've been wanting to see a really kick-butt Viking movie for awhile now... alas, this film was not what I was looking for. I had hoped for the best, but instead, was delivered a boring Nordic soap-opera that seemed to drag on too long despite its 84 minute running time. The film's premise is intriguing enough: It's about a Viking warlord who defies his God and Odin is so enraged that he curses the warlord's son, named Barek, to death and rebirth as a Berserker. This Barek guy is then forced to live enraged, insane, and violent lifetime after lifetime. The movie is filmed competently enough, with some rich cinematography and quasi-good performances by the actors, but again, I found myself bored and questioning when this dribble would end. The filmmakers had a chance to make something rather entertaining and semi-unique but they dropped the ball. Perhaps it could've been improved with some cheap exploitation tactics thrown in such as gratuitous nudity and lots of gore... I mean, we are talking about "Berserkers" here, aren't we? Vikings were supposed to be BAD enough, what with all the raping and pillaging, so aren't Berserkers supposed to be even more extreme? All in all, unless you're a fan of The Young and Restless (etc...) or, are yourself, in fact, an insane Berserker who likes self torture, I'd probably steer clear of this drab piece of celluloid.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A milestone in film production.....Not.
ksdilauri7 July 2019
No offense, guys, but I'm more than a little concerned for anybody who actually liked this---with the possible exception of the snarky, funny Rifftrax version. It's what occult-obsessed adolescent boys would make if they had the budget.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Awesome, the best thing that happened before One Tree Hill
kuchengnom21 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Beside the fact, that in all it's awesomeness this movie has risen beyond all my expectations, this masterpiece of cinema history portrait the overuse of crappy filters in it's best! Paul Johansson and Craig Sheffer show a brotherconflict with all there is to it. As usual a woman concieling her true intentions. The end came as surprising as unforssen as the killing of Keith Scott by his older brother.

The scenes in 'wiking land' are just as I remember it from my early time travels. - To be honest my strong passion for trash movies makes this one a must have in my never finished collection.

I recommend this movie to all the people in love with the most awesome brother cast from One Tree Hill.

-Odin-
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
You need to be really baked to enjoy this
sozzals9 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This entire film made no sense whatsoever. The plot? What plot? It was all an array of confusing words and scenes. What me and my partner remember about the film:

There was a viking battle then they were in a mental ward, then the bear men attacked a night club for some reason and thats pretty much when we got lost.

Some immediate questions arose from the whole film, including: why were they in a night club? why were the guys in the 21st century still wearing bear hats? why were all the women in the film vampires for no reason? why bear hats when the king was called boar? who was the old man! why was there a 20 minute journey to have a small conversation why was he in a cell and also chained up to the ceiling?

Good film to laugh at when you're stoned though.

I tried to watch it to the end, really I did. The hilarity was just too much though.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Here they are! Not born to be kings, it's a total ripoff movie...
Aaron13757 September 2022
Yes, this film seems to be trying to do the whole Highlander thing. However, while I understand what is going on in Highlander as it is totally easy to follow, I am going to have a hard time describing what the heck is happening in this one! Maybe there is thirty to forty minutes of this left on the cutting room floor which would help clear up what is going on, because man this thing was a jumbled mess!

The story...ha, ha, ha. Okay, here goes...it starts out with vikings wanting to do something and they need some other guys. One of the other guys is the main guy's brother. He apparently has power or worships Odin and he has witches that glow! Well there is a double cross, a witch who glows bites the normal brother and the next thing we see is the present and good brother is in chains in a mental institution. We get flashbacks that further confuse things as I am unclear if they happen before or after the bite...

This film tried to hard to have an edgy plot and ends up being a pretty incoherent film plot wise. We do get some good fights here and there, but a lot of what is going on moments too. Like, why did they go into the club and then turn on the sprinklers? What advantage was that supposed to give them!?!

Seriously though, the film is all over the place and pretty much in the category of films of watch it to make fun of it. I would have given this film a four had it been made in the 80's, but it was made in 2004 so there is no excuse for that horrible glowing effect for the witches or whatever they were supposed to be. This is one film I do not think one has to worry about clicking the yes on spoilers because I do not think anyone could fully explain the plot in such a way that it would spoil anything...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great viking movie!
sarah-hulme20 January 2003
What a great film!

I was very impressed with the special effects and the storyline was excellent!

This is a very well directed movie and I thoroughly enjoyed it!
8 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed