Young Adam (2003) Poster

(2003)

User Reviews

Review this title
124 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A measure of guilt
rosscinema27 October 2004
Warning: Spoilers
This film is based on the novel by Alexander Trocchi and those that have read it may find more insight to certain scenes while others may consider this a let down but my own personal view is that it's an interesting film about cynical characters that still feel guilt about their own actions. Story takes place in the early 1960's in Scotland where we see three characters and a small boy living and working on a river barge. Joe Taylor (Ewan McGregor) works for Les Gault (Peter Mullan) who's married to Ella (Tilda Swinton) and they work and live on their barge Atlantic Eve going back and forth from Edinburgh to Glasgow. One day Joe and Les fish the body of a woman out of the river and call the police who take her away but the authorities have a difficult time figuring out who she is and how she ended up in the river.

*****SPOILER ALERT*****

Joe and Ella start an affair but it doesn't take long before Les finds out and since the barge is owned by Ella it's Les who moves out but while all this is going on the police have found out that the woman in the river has been identified and was dating a married plummer who is now on trial for murder. What everyone doesn't know is that Joe knows the woman and her name is Cathie (Emily Mortimer) and he knows how she died but he doesn't tell anyone the circumstances that could free the man on trial.

Directed by David Mackenzie this intriguing little film is reminiscent of the film noir efforts of the 1940's and 1950's although with all the sex and nudity it's certainly one that is played for modern art house audiences. The cast is exceptional and both McGregor and Swinton have built their impressive careers by being able to play such diverse roles and this is no exception. Mullan with his terrific face is one of those great characters actors who never gives a bad performance and he appears born to play a tough guy who works on a river barge. On the surface the story for this film has it's characters behaving like cold hearted cynics incapable of any type of sorrow or pity for others but if you take a good look what this film really is about is unrelenting guilt. Joe does feel guilt for his actions and Ella for her husband Les and the three of them are compelled by the trial of the plummer. Even though their guilt is stemmed for different reasons it seems to bring them to the same place but the film shows that not everyone acts out on their guilt for moral reasons. It's a hard story about tough skinned characters who seem at odds about their morality and that's what makes this film so intriguing.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hail Ewan McGregor!
hellbetty17 September 2004
Okay, this film isn't for everyone. A little dreary, a little bleak, and the love scenes weren't always attractive, but something in the dark simplicity got me.

McGregor is incredibly versatile, I didn't think once of the bohemian poet Christian, or of Obi Wan... he's taken on an unlikeable character with a slow moving plot and pulled it off beautifully.

Tilda Swinton plays the antithesis of a Hollywood seductress, which makes some of the love scenes uncomfortable, but refreshing. The acting, as a whole, is the entire film. The action between characters is subtle and intense, and although I may be biased as an Ewan fan, I thought it was perfect for a dark, rainy night!
44 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Young Adam
william-linsley26 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I think the title Young Adam is a reference to the many legends that Adam, before partnering with Eve, had a previous wife named Lilith. Jewish legend sometimes identifies her with the Devil, and the origin of the wives of Cain and Seth was said to be in this supposed union with Lilith. The point as it affects the movie is that the entire action can be seen as a reflection or remembrance by a person who has since assumed an entire new life and role, who while resembling the character we watch in some ways, has left him behind. Note that the flashbacks in this film are completely unheralded; there are no cinematic devices to alert us to the fact that we are watching events that are past history. A voice-over narration was originally projected and partially recorded, but it was dropped from the final film. There can be no "director's cut" of this movie because what you see is the director's cut.

This film has the air of a film noir, and its essence is the moral consideration of the central character. A turning point is the drowning of the woman whose corpse is discovered at the beginning of the movie, played by Emily Mortimer. After several viewings, it has become clear to me that she grabs at his arm, trying to prevent him from leaving, and stumbles when he pulls his arm away sharply. He does not push her, nor even look at her, and it is clear from her actions that she has simply lost her footing. The most striking thing is that she then vanishes into the water almost without a sound. I am sure that filming the scene this way was a deliberate choice of the director. Her silence, the absence of screams, and the way she disappears before one even realizes what has happened, surrounds the event with mystery, and raises questions in the viewer's mind, questions that the film wants the viewer to ask. How far is he responsible for her death? Did he murder her or was it accidental? The ambiguity of the event is essential to what follows.

The decision to use the bargeman's wife and the world of her barge as a way of unfolding the history of the main character is interesting. It is an artifice that does not feel artificial. Tilda Swinton's sensitive performance allows us the possibility to feel compassion for this woman's condition and fate, without in any way softening the edges of her character. The film allows both comparisons and contrasts between her and the main character, both of whom rebel against their fates. Observe that the character and motives of the murdered girl and of the bargeman husband appear by comparison straightforward and uncomplicated. One could justly compare the naturalistic view of character in this film to the novels of Crane, Dreiser, Flaubert and Zola. The people are viewed with a kind of detachment rare in American films. The beauty of the countryside is effective as a setting for the rather stark and bitter dramas that these characters enact, and it dominates the opening movements of the tale. The slow pace of the film is also a naturalistic choice, conveying a sense of the monotony of these lives, and the meditative air is helped by the brooding score by David Byrne of Talking Heads fame.

It would be worth some study to see how the flashback scenes are timed in relation to the action in the "present" (as I said, the entire film could be seen as a flashback from some unknown future existence of the main character). The structure is complex without being a gimmick. At one point you see the barge going into a tunnel, and Ewan MacGregor is seen in silhouette, piloting the vessel from some point of view inside the tunnel. And in the flashback scene we are about to enter, the character is indeed entering a kind of dark tunnel. When we emerge from this tunnel at the end of the film we don't have every answer, but the irrevocable path this man has taken awakens a sense of wonder at his tragedy. Especially as the film draws to its end we are watching the steady unraveling of his character.

In a sense the anomie of working class life is the subject of this film. As in film noir detective films, the action seems to occur inside the central character's head. All the real events are of the mind and heart, and the art of the film is to suggest them entirely by means of exterior events. As one is led to the question of this man's guilt by watching him respond to the trial of another man, a gradual yet very effective suspense develops. A comparison to films like The Postman Always Rings Twice (remade by Visconti in Italy as Obsession) and This Sporting Life suggests itself. The sentencing of the innocent man, one more victim, provides the denouement, and one has the sense that sentence has been passed upon the protagonist as well. The ending, unfortunately just a little contrived and clichéd, is the weakest aspect of this very good film. I was particularly struck by the film's meditative character, which is very well sustained, by its overall unity, and by the acting performances.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Subtle, near great, not for everyone.
GrapeCrusher17 September 2004
A thoughtful, unapologetic and non judgmental character study of Joe, one man, one distinctly unique yet common man. It is presented in the context of a mystery, but this is no mystery thriller. Thrill seekers, go elsewhere.

If you crave action, dialog, explanations and clear resolutions to a plot, I suggest you avoid this film. If you are fascinated by human complexity, admire beautifully crafted film-making, and can think and observe for yourself, this may be a rewarding experience for you. If you love and understand great acting you must see this film.

It is exquisitely filmed, in an understated and confident manner, using hue and tint as artfully as any great painter. Joe lives in a drab and uninspiring world, mostly of interiors; tight, constricted places, where the inhabitants are caged too closely, too much ever present in each other's spaces. When we are occasionally brought out into the world at large, this tight confining world is often seen to be surrounded by a distant, unreachable beauty. There are subtly beautiful panoramas of the lush greenness of Scotland off in the distance, out of reach of Joe, of all the people of his world.

The structure, the editing, the weaving of time present and time past is without conceit. There is no "look at how cleverly I did that transition" cutting. It is a perfect representation of editing unseen, unnoticed, the mark of brilliant editing. Everything comes together, simply and without explanation. Characters are presented simply, without prelude. Events occur, without justification. You must think and observe for yourself. If there are conclusions to be made, they must be yours.

If for no other reason, see this film to experience Ewan McGregor: He has been a reasonably attractive and adequate performer, in mostly rather forgettable productions, until now. Here he suddenly emerges as an actor of astounding depth and complexity, inhabiting, living, revealing another soul. Without any reservation this is a great performance. His subtlety, his inner directed creation of a complete individual, is simply remarkable. It is a complete, compelling, always true performance. You cannot look away from Joe. You must follow him, know him. Do you know him? Can you ever really know him?

The plot, what little of it there is, unfolds through character and behavior, with a minimum of dialog. There is much complete silence in this film. The score is understated, never telegraphing what you are supposed to feel or think. Indeed, I doubt that there is an answer to any question here. Who is Joe? What is Joe? That is not the point.

Here is Joe. This is what he is, this is what he has done. What will he do now? There is a quiet suspense, never quite gratified, which begins with the very first frame,a corpse, gently floating, photographed darkly, from below, so dark there is no face. A deceased, faceless female human being.

Joe's is the first face we see. That first glimpse of his eyes, told me that nothing would be what it seemed in this film. Joe sees something we do not see. So begins the mystery.

Nothing is jarring, nothing is false. Life is simply never quite what we think it is. Make no mistake. There is a real mystery here to be revealed. Not a contrived, plot dependent series of revelations. It is the unpeeling of the layers of a human being.

Much has been mentioned in this forum about the frequent sex scenes. They are achingly non-erotic, distanced and cold, and ultimately only functional. It is a passionless, desperate, mutually using and abusing kind of sex. Only one scene has heat. And that scene is not really sex. It is frustration, anger, vengeance, humiliation and desperation. This scene is truly horrible, truly frightening and truly revelatory.

I haven't told you much about the plot. That is deliberate. The plot works. It reveals the character. The progression of events is true, often surprising, but never false, never contrived. If you need to be told what is happening and why, this is not for you.

If you love great acting, by all involved, and appreciate the crafts and arts of film construction, I highly recommend "Young Adam".

(I have one question for anyone out there who might have a feasible answer: the title confounds me. There is no Adam. Nor is there any reference to an Adam. I could draw no path to or from Genesis. So why is this called "Young Adam"?)
116 out of 129 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A slow movie with a gripping theme
gazineo-112 December 2005
"Young Adam' is one of these movies that has a simple and thin story line to tell us but made the experience extremely rewarding. The principal character here is a young, detached and gloomy man (portrayed with a convincing low tone by Ewan McGregor) who lives an uncertain life. He gets a job in a barge conducted by Les (Mullan) and becomes involved with his wife Ella (Swinton) in a relationship marked by crude lust and an oppressive despair. The relationship between Joe and Ella is just the right background for director David McKenzie gives the message of the movie. A message that told us, in a gripping and moving way, that people are living lives without sense and dignity and that the modern world is a place where communication is almost impossible between human beings. 'Young Adam' is a movie about loneliness and because of that is a movie sparkled with a moody and unrelenting tone.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nuanced sensation--the raw world of canal barge life in Scotland
secondtake22 June 2010
Young Adam (2003)

A slow but never ponderous movie that floats, much like the canal barge that is its centerpiece, through one man's series of thoughtless relationships. It has spontaneous sex that will bother some people for its mindless adultery. And this is no bucolic or poetic joy ride. It has lots of gloomy, dirty scenes, and the main characters, except lead Ewan McGregor, are portrayed as unkempt, very working class types, not unlikeable, but raw.

What I mean is this is more Van Gogh than Monet. And to linger, and follow a slow pace as McGregor's Joe works and meets women and falls into necessary problems and doesn't quite deal with any of them, is to have an interesting, but not quite pretty, experience. For me this is terrific.

I had forgotten I had seen this when it came out, and when the barges showed up it was a welcome reminder. These canals handle small commercial and pleasure boats in a network of thousands of miles, including much of Scotland where Young Adam is set. (For info on this, check the site www.drifters.co.uk/canals.htm.) But the rising leisure use is ignored here, and so we have what amounts to one last look at an era of small time carriers of coal and other heavy goods on these backwaters. It's a rough world in many ways, snaking behind the main streets like old railroad tracks, and a perfect setting for the behind the scenes events--murder and sex--that make Young Adam unsettling.

McGregor plays (or underplays) his character Joe with a coal dusted, pretty boy perfection, laconic and yet not thoughtless. He's supported beautifully by Tilda Swinton as the more virtuosic part of an unhappy boatsman's wife. In a minor but sexed up role, Emilie Mortimer plays what is really McGregor's equal, and you come to see that he is an interloper on the boats, at first misplaced but increasingly absorbed by its shiftless lifestyle.

The back and forth storytelling (lots of flashbacks in different durations), the subtle but effective score by David Byrne (of Talking Heads fame), and most of all the understated, smart direction by little known David Mackenzie make this unique and quite strong. It stumbles a little in the courtroom scenes, which are a little unlikely and stiff, and overall in making a sensational plot have subtleties beyond the acting itself. The events are filled with certain expected twists, or with unexpected ones that are a little plain to see in retrospect, without complications beyond the big one, which you will see.

But this is nitpicking a surprisingly good little film. Let it settle in, without distraction, and watch the players play.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the Coldest and Most Amoral Characters Ever
claudio_carvalho22 May 2007
In Glasgow, the drifter of few words Joe Taylor (Ewan McGregor) is working in an old boat with the sailor Les Gault (Peter Mullan) and his wife Ella Gault (Tilda Swinton) transporting coal and other cargoes through the River Clyde. While loading the hold with coal, they find the body of a young woman wearing petticoat floating on the river and they bring it to the harbor. Joe recalls through flashbacks his relationship with his former mistress Cathie Dimly (Emily Mortimer), while he seduces Ella in a carnal attraction, having sex with her in the absence of Les. When the police arrest a suspect of the murder of woman, Joe becomes interested in the case, while his thoughts disclose the truth about the death of the victim.

"Young Adam" is a weird low paced movie, with an original screenplay, a claustrophobic and erotic story, great performances and excellent study and development of characters. Ewan McGregor is amazing in the role of one of the coldest and most amoral characters ever, who just speaks few words but is successful with lonely women. The sweet and gorgeous Emily Mortimer performs a woman in love that subjects herself to humiliating situations. Tilda Swinton is also fantastic in the role of a worker and mother with a wasted marriage, totally negligent with her appearance that finds that she is a woman capable of loving a man. The screenplay discloses the plot through flashbacks and in spite of being low paced, keeps the attention to the very end. The realistic story is sad and pessimist as the gray image of Scotland, without any redemption in the end. The music score of David Byrne fits perfectly to the mood and the atmosphere. I have not understood the title of this movie, which has no explanation along the story. Last but not the least, a barge is a vessel without propulsion, which is not the case of the propelled boat "Atlantic Eve". My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Pecados Ardentes" ("Heat Sins")
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A beat hymn
marinelad4 May 2006
It would take a lot of space to describe the long and windy road that Alexander Trocchi's novel had to go through to become filmed. Almost forgotten beat generation writer, pornographer, drug addict and vagabond who seem to be a person with a lot of talent for destruction, was re-discovered by David McKenzie who made a script based upon this novel. It took several years to get this film made and the fight was tough and exhausting. The leading actor, Ewan McGregor, did many efforts in this direction as well – and here we are, watching (even on the Bosnian TV!) a sharp and pretty brutal film about a womanizer who seduces and abandons almost all women in his surrounding. Although the film starts with a romantic scene of a beautiful swan on the calm water, the floating female corps appears immediately after the bird and turns all the beauty into the gloomy mystery. As the story folds up, we discover the secret life of the main characters following explicitly their sexual relationships and hidden past. In a true beat manner it seems that the whole life of the main character lacks some kind of purpose. Joe's senseless drifting from one woman to another comes in the flash-back retrospective episodes while the boat hovers through the channel between Glasgow and Edinburgh. Two men and a woman on the boat more mumble than talk and more communicate with the body language than with words. While Joe seduces Leslie's (great Peter Mullan) wife Ella (absolutely brilliant Tilda Swinton) in the present, it becomes clear that the deceased girl was a young vagrant's previous lover and that he knows very well how she died. Besides superb acting from the whole team, very special taste to this erotic, dark tale gives brilliant music by David Byrne which softens it when it becomes too mean to digest.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Adam and Eve ... without the Tree.
film-critic26 September 2004
What an emotionless portrayal of an emotionless man. Ewan yet again proves that he is a force in both the Hollywood community and in the independent forum. Not only for having the bravery to go against American cliché and fight to keep his full frontal nudity in the film, but also for having the gumption to take this role. This is not your average character. Joe is not your normal 'hero'. In fact, I would go so far as to say that he represents all of us. He is, sadly, our 'hero'. Joe (and Ewan portrays this perfectly) is constantly looking for happiness and acceptance, but somehow cannot find it due to the sexual urges that he has. It is interesting to see him want to have emotion, but yet have no issues with sleeping with another man's wife. This is a story of maturity for Joe, but sadly we do not ever see it. When I was watching this film I was continually thinking of the film Alfie (not the new release, but the older) in which a man embarks on several relationships and ultimately ends up with nothing. That is very similar to the story that we have here, only Young Adam is much grittier and darker … and, well, more explicit.

So many times in cinema we watch two actors give heartbreaking performances on screen, but just do not have the chemistry needed to really pull together those intense sex scenes. That is not the case here. The chemistry and raw emotion between Ewan and Tilda Swinton is phenomenal. I have not seen a better match up in cinema in a long time. This successfully added that extra intensity to their moments of glory. I was able to feel and see their emotion and passion for each other on the screen. It was exactly what this film needed to reach the next level.

I know this story is based off a book, but I felt that director David Mackenzie did a fantastic job of setting the mood and the scenes. He amazingly built this sense of claustrophobia that surrounded Joe from not only inside the boat, but also under the truck and in the second apartment. There was even that feeling at the trial. This claustrophobia is one of the reasons why Joe never stays in one place for very long. While some will argue that he is nothing more than a heartless womanizer and a coward, I saw him as a tragic spirit searching for the lifelong happiness that he could never find. His conscious was too heavy on him to ever find that perfect place. Mackenzie allowed Ewan to find this character, and this powerful drama was transformed well into the screen.

Finally, I would like to add that Ewan would not have been worth seeing in this film if it wasn't for the impressive Tilda Swinton who is seemingly in everything lately and gives nothing less than 110%. I have not seen anything that she has been in that was anything below good. She is our next Oscar winner and one of those actresses that are not afraid to get dirty. Her portrayal of Ella is no different. While others would have simply just played the part, Swinton creates the part and gives this film the backbone that it deserves. She nearly steals every scene from Ewan, and that is impressive.

Overall, Young Adam is a deeply disturbing and depressing film that is not for everyone, but will be enjoyed by those that are fans of this genre.

Grade: **** out of *****
94 out of 108 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Young Adam
jboothmillard14 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I have no idea what the meaning of the title is, maybe something to do with Adam and Eve, but I guess it doesn't matter, this sounded like a good film to try, and the cast list was very appealing, so I watched. Basically Joe Taylor (BAFTA Scotland winning Ewan McGregor) is the young drifter who works on the barge owned by Les Gault (Peter Mullan) and his wife Ella (BAFTA Scotland winning Tilda Swinton), they travel between Glasgow and Edinburgh transporting coal and other cargo. One day Joe and Les find the body of a dead young woman floating in the water wearing nothing but a petticoat, and they drag it out for the police to determine whether it was a murder, a suicide or an accident. As his work continues, Joe starts looking at Ella in a different way, slowly and eventually managing to seduce her with his attraction for her, and with Les not around they start a sexual affair. As the police investigates the death of the woman, and they are putting the blame on her ex, we find out from flashbacks that Joe knows more than he is admitting. Before the death happened, he met the beautiful young office worker Cathie Dimly (Emily Mortimer), who he also manage to charm her, they start living together and have a lot of passionate sex. As Les becomes aware of the affair between Joe and Ella, that is when in the flashbacks it is revealed that the dead body is indeed Cathie, and she fell in the water by accident, after admitting that she was pregnant with Joe's baby. We also see in further flashback that Joe had an aggressive side, and back in the current time he is still keeping quiet about his involvement with Cathie. In the end Cathie's ex is found guilty of murder and no proof is found that it was an accidentally death, Joe leaves Ella and Les's canal boat with nothing but a guilty conscience. Also starring Jack McElhone as Jim Gault, Therese Bradley as Gwen, Ewan Stewart as Daniel Gordon, Stuart McQuarrie as Bill and Pauline Turner as Connie. McGregor, putting his meat and two veg on show once again, is really good as the conflicted and sex addict, Swinton does almost steal the show as the sex-craving barge woman, who also gets naked, and Mortimer in the flashbacks is very good, with her clothes off too. The film is just stuffed with sexual scenes, and with the dead body premise it combines film noir and melodrama, all adding up to a well crafted and most watchable period drama. It won the BAFTAs Scotland for Best Director for David Mackenzie and Best Film. Ewan McGregor was number 9 on The 100 Greatest Movie Stars, he was number 2 on The 50 Greatest British Actors, and Emily Mortimer was number 47, and Tilda Swinton number 44 on The 50 Greatest British Actresses. Very good!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Grim and Joyless (And who the heck is Young Adam?)
gpadillo23 August 2005
My friends and I disagree on this one.

What a dry, dour, charmless film is "Young Adam." The story is bleak the characters, almost all of them, despicable are utterly impossible to route for. Tilda Swinton, an actress I normally find attractive, is here, as Ella, a ghastly, tough, worn out creature and a bit of a shrew but mostly haggish.

Joe, as portrayed by Ewan McGregor (one of my favorite actors) gives his all as a too young to be this world weary, callow man who, having given up his dreams and fantasies of a better life, aimlessly goes through life, with no honor or self respect. For a bit of adventure he bangs nearly every woman in sight. In fact, a betting game can be played whenever a new female character is introduced as to how many minutes before we're having to see their contorted naked bodies going at it.

Bargemates Joe and Les's (an excellent performance by multi talented actor/writer/director Peter Mullan, who's "Orphans" is one of the best things from Scotland in ages) discovery of a dead girl at the film's start, unravels the story in achingly slow fashion and paints an increasingly disturbing picture of Joe. One always wants to route for a film's hero but "Young Adam" doesn't have one. The lead character has nothing redeemable about him and it's depressing to watch a film where not a single shred of hope or decency can break through the grim, gray bleakness.

If you like this sort of thing, you'll love "Young Adam" - as for me, I hated it - something I rarely say about any film. Even the beauty of the way the film was shot (it is visually brilliant) couldn't save this for me. Blech.
10 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well-crafted film with strong performances and a pervading, restrained sadness that echoes its Beat heritage.
colettesplace22 December 2004
Young Adam is a powerful and atmospheric drama set on the canals between Glasgow and Edinburgh during the 1950s.

Ewan McGregor is Joe, a drifter working on a barge, when he and his boss find a body in the canal. As he begins an affair with the bargeman's wife (Tilda Swinton), we find out more about his previous relationship with the drowned woman (Emily Mortimer).

Adapted from the novel by Scottish Beat writer Alexander Trocchi, Young Adam is, in some ways, a kitchen sink drama – a vivid picture of working class life in its unpleasant reality. One of the best examples of this type of film is Room at the Top (1959). But Young Adam has existentialist overtones: Joe is alienated and passive, and not only do his numerous sexual couplings offer him little pleasure, but in rejecting the only thing that could redeem him, he condemns himself to a meaningless life. This might sound too depressing, but screenwriter and director David Mackenzie gives the film great depth and sensuality. Very interesting. ****/***** stars.
30 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tilda and Ewan are Awesome!
RockPortReview3 December 2012
Love and regret. Cold weather and hot drama. The 2003 Scottish film "Young Adam" stars some of the finest actors working today Ewan McGregor, Tilda Swinton, Emily Mortimer, and Peter Mullan. Based on a novel by Alexander Trocchi, "Young Adam" is a study in character, mood, and psychology of its well defined characters.

Taking place in 1950's Glasgow, Scotland. Joe (McGregor) is working on a coal barge, when he sees a woman's body floating towards him. He and the much older Les (Mullan) drag her aboard. She looks to have been assaulted as she is only wearing a thin petticoat. Joe seems particularly upset at the site of this, as if he knows something. Joe's back story is told in a number of flashbacks. He was a writer who fell in love with a girl named Cathie (Mortimer), their rocky relationship is chronicled in most of the flashbacks. They eventually show how Joe ended up working on the barge. Daily life on the barge is cold, cramped, and dirty. Throw in Les's wife Ella (Swinton) and you have the makings of a sort of one sided love triangle. Although she half heartedly tries to deny Joe's advances, she ultimately gives into him. Her marriage to Les is just as cold and bitter as a Glasgow winter. Les knows their having and affair, but really does nothing to stop them.

As we find out Joe is really not that good of a person, but he is not really all that bad either. We also find out what has been haunting him, and there are things he could do to set the record straight, but does he risk his own life to do it? All of the characters are tortured souls in one way or another, making their way through life like a slow rolling fog. All of the acting if magnificent, especially by the women. Nothing is held back and their fearlessness makes a huge impact.

"Young Adam" is rated the dreaded NC-17 for explicit sex and nudity, but its not done in a gratuitous or exploitive way. Don't let the rating discourage you from seeing this truly great film. Search it out tonight!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very boring and waste of talent and money
Bar2D224 July 2005
I have been watching this movie with growing irritation. What is the message or meaning? The main character does not evolve and is basically a bastard and a coward. Sorry, but all it did was irritate me......... Of course it sketches life (more specific the atmosphere on the rivers with its boats) in Britain during the time it is set in a bit, but not in a way that it add something knowledgeable or goes deeper in on the problems of that time. I also find the movie very predictable. Every time Joe meets a women, you know what is going to happen and the irritation grows. Dark, very dark and useless. I can not see the "art" in it, if that was the meaning.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Relentless character study of a man on the run
paulekert14 November 2004
The films focus on translating the novels first person perspective is clearly an obsession for this director. Never is the audiences attention allowed outside of Joe's point of view. We see only what he sees, we hear nothing more and we remember his life in little snatches, moments of dark disgusting and secret clarity he keeps from the world.

The film starts with a corpse, a barely dressed woman floating in the Clyde that is fished out by Joe; a young man working the barges for reasons that are not immediately clear. This brutal beginning in which we see Joe lay a tender hand on the cold dead flesh of the girl begins the film with a level of tension that rarely leaves the screen. Through his actions and - more importantly - his inactions we peel away the outer layers of a man on the run from himself, from responsibility and from guilt. We see him commit two murders by mission of inaction and we see him quietly dealing with that in one last lingering shot that tells us he will never change.

Joe is sexually driven to destroy life around him and he uses sex as a weapon against himself and against the possibility of settling or creating a future. He could be a writer, but he lacks the courage to read his own work. He could be a father, but he cannot face the thought of commitment. He could be a lover, but he makes love to women only as a means to an end, rejecting and pushing them away once the act is completed.

And this is the film in a nutshell. A relentless character study of an unpleasant man who punishes those around him for his own failings. Yes there is gratuitous sex in this film, but it has its place, it defines the moments of change in everyone else's lives while underlining the static character of Joe, played with utter brilliance by Ewen McGregor. The sex is cold, rather than erotic, reflecting the characters contempt for those he uses. Without the detailed sex scenes the film would be less than it is, but audiences expected to be titillated will come away disappointed.

Not without flaws this film has that perplexing title and a scene in which Joe beats his girlfriend after covering her with custard. The scene is alien to both the film and the character of Joe who gives no indication of being violent, rather a man that will walk out on a problem rather than face the awful possibility of confrontation. In fact Ewen McGregor seems embarrassed to play this scene, as though he too cannot link this outburst to the character he is playing.

But this minor quibble apart the film remains an artistically shot work, played with brilliance by everyone. Its rare to see a film where the whole cast are brilliant, where the script is clearly cut and the direction thought through. The visual aspect of the film is also tremendous with each shot being laid out in front of us like a painting, a wondrous work of art that moves and flows to show us the 60's post war Brittan with utter clarity.

Hollywood please take note.
60 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I'm sorry, but I didn't get it
AlanSquier25 February 2007
It seems like everyone loves this film and it sure won the BAFTAs. But I found it dreary, sordid, and slow. Slowness doesn't usually kill a film for me, but in this case, I was constantly impatient to get out of the various bedrooms and into something more fitting to my usual tastes.

I will say that I loved watching Tilda Swinton, but then I always do. She's a doll. She doesn't try for glamor in this, and yet she is quietly glamorous.

And I did enjoy the scenery, but then scenery from the British isles always pleases me. The cinematography was good.

However, it did seem so immersed in sex and sometimes perverse and sordid in the graphic portrayal.

Well, somebody said it isn't for everyone and I guess I'm one of the guys it isn't for.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Young Adam is Cinematically Gorgeous!
bperry-518 October 2005
The story is slow and methodical and may bore action-oriented viewers. However, if you are a true cinephile you will notice the extremely brilliant cinematography. There's one incredible scene of McGregor on the barge as it drifts down a foggy river. The scene is quiet and slow, but it is one of the most beautifully framed shots I've ever seen; it rivals the best Fellini.

The sex is graphic, with full frontally of Ewen (not a small boy, wink, wink) and Tilda, but necessary to show their mental states.

The four main characters; the Barge Operator (Mullen), his wife the Barge Owner (Swinton), the new hire (McGregor), and the barge owner's son. The interplay between them all is stilted but convincing. There are odd sparks between Swinton and McGregor immediately hinting at what is to come.

Again, there's not much here for the action lover, but if you're really patient the movie will stay in your mind for a long time. I haven't seen it for years and I still remember that fog scene.

Gorgeous!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Adam who?
=G=3 October 2004
"Young Adam" is all about Joe (McGregor), an ordinary working stiff employed as a deck hand on a Scottish coal barge, who knows more about the dead body he and his mate fish from the waters than he lets on. That's about as interesting as this well crafted exercise in tedium gets as we watch the laconic and stoic Joe enjoy the sexual favors of every woman he encounters without so much as a "by your leave". When all is said and done we're left with the impression that the women of Glasgow can't wait to drop their skivvies for fresh meat and the Scottish criminal justice system consists of little more than pompous mental midgets. This foreign flavored artie dramatic fabrication received nominal reviews, some local awards, and a love it or hate it reaction from the public. Fodder for foreign film freaks only. (B-)
4 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
confused storytelling muddies up tension
SnoopyStyle27 May 2015
It's the 50s Scotland. Joe Taylor (Ewan McGregor) and Les Gault (Peter Mullan) find a dead body in the water. The cops come and start an investigation. Joe starts flirting and having sex with Les' wife Ella (Tilda Swinton). The movie has many flashbacks which reveals that Joe was sleeping with the dead woman Cathie Dimly (Emily Mortimer).

The confused way of storytelling is deliberate and I wonder if it would be better to be a little clearer. Even a little thing like the year would be helpful. They need to explain that Joe is staying with Gaults. I thought they were related until Joe starts flirting with Ella. It would also be helpful to directly identify the dead body as Cathie Dimly right away. The flashbacks are not obvious at first which just leads to more confusions. If the connections are made more clear, the tension wouldn't be so muddied. The story does take a very compelling turn and finishes with a good ending.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Mirror, mirror – when on the ball, who is the darkest of them all?
RJBurke19429 May 2011
By halfway through this story, the biblical underpinnings become firmly apparent: this is an allegory for The First Man, and his base, animal instincts. Hence, it's a tried and true thematic device, used by many authors: for example, in the tradition of Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (1960), Sons and Lovers (1960), and many other films that explore sexual transgressions coupled with (no pun intended) unrelenting naked desire, the author, Alexander Trocchi, presents his version of the modern Adam – always on the make, and totally suffused with his own animal desires and his pretentious efforts at self-fulfillment.

In truth, the Young Adam of this story, Joe Taylor (Ewan McGregor) is portrayed as, at best, misanthropic and crypto-misogynistic. Taken to extreme, Young Adam could be borderline sociopath in another story and setting. This is not satire, however, as with Patrick Bateman (deliciously played by Christian Bale) in American Psycho (2000). No, this is a reality that existed in the 1950s setting of the novel and which remains a stigma within all humans today. In truth, I think it was St.Jerome, in one of the biblical stories, who moaned about his need for release from his sexual depravities. But, nothing much changes in human relationships, from antiquity to now.

In a manner, you can look at this story as Ingmar Bergman for the poorer masses – another version of dirty scenes from a dirty marriage: because in this plot, the unwashed Joe is presented with a moral dilemma as the story progresses: am I truly my brother's keeper? So, the question for him, finally, is: will he be able to rise above his animality and achieve a humanity that he has avoided throughout his young life to date?

McGregor's acting in this story is stunning; so also Tilda Swinton as Young Adam's latest sexual conquest (Ella) aboard a coal-carrying canal barge (aptly named Atlantic Eve) where he thinks he's escaping from his responsibilities. Poor Joe – he's such a slave to his desires, he just can't stop: on the barge, in alleyways, under trucks, on the floor, against a canal wall – anywhere for a quick hit, so that he can forget about his failure as an aspiring writer, among other things. To that extent, one is reminded of the controlled excesses in Last Tango in Paris (1972), where Marlon Brando gave his finest performance as another poor slave to animal passions. And, while on the topic, how can anybody forget sociopathic Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper) and his velvet fetish in Blue Velvet (1986)?

On the other hand, the same theme has been used for light or outrageous comedy with films such as Tom Jones (1963), Kubrick's masterpiece Barry Lyndon (1975) and Boogie Nights (1997), all worth seeing, simply because none hurt the psyche.

But, getting back to Joe – so ordinary Joe, a symbol for all men, young and older – as he fills his days as a canal-worker-slave, obtaining relief from boredom only when satisfying his slavish work in a different type of living canal. Significantly, the director has the barge enter a few dark, moist tunnels through which the barge travels – and with the men treading all over it, albeit somewhat delicately, and just enough to make sure they exit carefully.

You don't get symbols like that too often in films; a delight to savor, for the location and the execution.

The denouement for the story arrives when our Joe makes his moral choice – a choice so fundamental, you stare at his face, watching his look, the tortured eyes, the mouth, his eyebrows, all as an expression of the raging dilemma within his animal/human brain. Rarely will you see such a choice done so well, and with such resigned finality – and a mirror for all of us to ponder in our darkest hours.

The supporting cast is exemplary, while the photography, sound and editing match the needs for such an important – and yet ordinary – story to be portrayed so professionally. Occasionally, it was momentarily difficult to sort out past, present and future; but not so much that the structure caused any unresolved confusion.

The NC-17 and R ratings are appropriate: this is not a film for children or adolescents. But, I highly recommend it for all adults – young and old – who are not afraid to look critically within themselves.

May 10, 2011.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cold but honest
malcp28 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Joe, a failed writer, takes up a job working on a barge on the Clyde. The job provides young Joe with every opportunity and experience an educated and aspiring existentialist might need to develop. Flashbacks reveal that Joe has set himself in such a mould, a special man, far above the bland observations of a mere novelist. However, as the story unfolds the shallowness of his position becomes more and more clear. The death of Joe's ex-girlfriend, though accidental, is also cynically convenient and her death provides the turning point through which the film explores the mind of Joe and the superficiality of his life. The story is engrossing, Joe, our "Young Adam" happy to partake of the fruits of the garden of Eden, but devoid of wisdom - the knowledge of good and evil, Joe's perception of himself and the glory of this young Adam is nothing but a sham.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
very bad
evso15 March 2004
I have seen many movies, and I think this is one of the worst. I have never walked out of a movie, and I walked out of this one last night. I wanted to like it because of the wonderful actors in it and I generally appreciate British film. I kept wanting it to get better, and it never did. The story could be interesting, if there was more of it. There is a lack of much dialogue at all, so I didn't really understand the main characters. The flashback sequences were quite confusing and misleading. I left after the custard/rape scene because I just couldn't handle any more. If you like soft-core porn, then this movie is for you. Out of the hour and fifteen minutes I saw, about 45 minutes of that was sex. I exagerrate SLIGHTLY. I will admit, there were a few shots that struck me as being beautifully shot. I think the cinematography is the best part of the film. It isn't good enough to save it, though.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Haunting film noir
cryofry7 April 2006
Deviating from the mainstream films, "Young Adam" is something of a rarity. It is poignant, erotic and lifelike in it's viewing.

Adapted from the novel by Alexander Trocchi, "Young Adam" chronicles the life of Joe Taylor (Ewan McGregor), a nomadic drifter working on a barge. The film is narrated from Joe's personal perspective, which works quite admirably. At points, you feel like you are actually Joe, seeing the world as he sees it.

As mentioned, Joe is a drifter, a man with a past whose sexual drive constantly lands him in bed with the numerous women that he meets, in-particularly Ella Gault (Tilda Swinton), the wife of his current boss (Peter Mullan). Joe's "conquests" are shown in vivid detail, something that is not seen in many of today's films. This in itself makes for compelling viewing.

If you have not read the book, you will find yourself asking, "who is Joe?". It's a good question as his initial identity remains shrouded in a thin veil of mystery. The discovery of a dead woman named Cathie Dimly (Emily Mortimer) floating in the murky Scottish waters adds to the enigma that is Joe. Does he know more about her than he is letting on? Did he kill her?

By the end of the film, the character of Joe Taylor is as enigmatic as he was at the start. Maybe even more so. David Mackenzie has succeeded in making a truly riveting, haunting film.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Who knew raw sex could be so boring?
wjfickling22 May 2005
I think I counted 4 actors, 3 female, one male, who display full frontal nudity in this film, all of whom have attractive bodies, and two more who display partial nudity, and all 6 are shown engaging in explicit sexual acts, some quite graphic. Yet it is all quite unerotic. How can a film that has explicit sex, excellent acting, a well written script, good editing, and beautiful yet bleak photography be so excruciatingly boring? The film's running time is about 1 hour and 40 minutes, yet it seemed longer than Ben Hur. It truly proceeds at a snail's pace and is best saved for viewing on one of those nights when you can't sleep, because it is an ideal cure for insomnia.

One problem is that, with the exception of the Emily Mortimer character, none of the characters is really likable. Tilda Swinton plays a shrewish yet sexually frustrated barge wife who is totally obtuse as to the true nature of the man she took as a lover; does she really think this rootless sociopath is going to settle down in a house in the suburbs? Her cuckolded husband, although basically a decent man who engages sympathy at times, is basically a dolt who finds little else to interest him other than drinking beer and playing darts at the local pub. Swinton's sister is a treacherous and alcoholic nymphomaniac, and Macgregor's new landlady, who appears late in the film, is a treacherous non-alcoholic (as far as we can tell) nymphomaniac.

All of which leads us to the lead character, played by Ewan Macgregor. In fact, this character tipped me off as to what the main problem with this film is: it is an anachronism. This film, minus the explicit sex, could, and perhaps should, have been made between 1955 and 1965. The Macgregor character is totally in tune with the "angry young men" of that era who used to be played by Albert Finney, Tom Courtenay, Alan Bates, Lawrence Harvey, and the like. In that era, ruthless male machismo bordering on sociopathy, which included treating women like objects and degrading them sexually, might have been in vogue or at least tolerated, but this character seems woefully out of synch with modern sensibilities. In other words, the character is a total s**t. But who knows? Maybe some people enjoy watching films about people like that, but this viewer doesn't.

So, the only reason to see this film is for the nudity. Otherwise, skip it.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
miserable depressing crap telegraphing the ending
wicroft15 January 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Spoiler didnt like it much

the book was an enigma wrapped in a riddle

this was just cheeky chappie Ewan shagging everything in sight and allowing the innocent guy to take the rap. just for example - the book never made it clear as to whether he had murdered the girl plus Trochi had him going into a cop shop at the end - thus it left one wondering.

the pathetic attempt to be controversial with the custard, or whatever it was, sex scene was risible.

dismal!
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed