(1966)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Miss conduct
FrancisTorchio7 March 2016
One of the first soft core films I saw. It was an interesting blend of black and white combined with color photography. I saw the film at the Metropolitan theater which no longer exists on 14th St. in Manhattan on the East side. The film would be classified as a T&A film (tits and ass). At that time (mid 1960's), pubic regions were not shown except in under the counter hard core films not commercially shown. The most memorable parts of the film was how beautiful the actresses were. They were June Roberts, Darlene Bennett and Marlene Eck. I have always had a soft spot for these actresses and am tracking down the films they appeared in. Most of the film was in black and white. The color portions (in very grainy 16 mm film stock) was when the nudity was shown. The plot was ridiculous but the topless shots of the actresses dancing and wrestling were great.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excerpt is tantalizing
lor_21 November 2011
Something Weird recently issued a 19-minute excerpt of this "lost" film as filler, rounding out (unannounced) the program on its DVD-R release of the execrable feature THE ALL American HONEYMOON.

The five beautiful and buxom women, including faves June Roberts and Darlene Bennett, make this a title I'm hoping to complete some day. The segment that exists offers more than enough topless pulchritude for its era, with the plus that Bennett is shown in color to great advantage, as she is in various short films accompanied by her twin sister, while her other feature films are generally black & white.

Louis Walden, an iconic soft porn figure (who went hardcore memorably in Warhol's trail-blazing BLUE MOVIE), show some comedy skills as the hapless hero tormented Walter Mitty-style by these beauties. Of the less familiar actresses, top-heavy Penny Marleton is appealing though apparently a one-shot.

IMDb mysteriously also lists a 1968 explicit "stag film" with this title, but I'm not sure if that exists or is merely a mistaken duplication for this movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed