Cheating (1952) Poster

(1952)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Cheating is bad. Richard Basehart is good. *SPOILERS*
icehole47 May 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This short film is pretty much what you'd expect from Centron Productions. Bad acting, bad plotline, etc. Everyone looks like a stick in this short, even the women. It's basically about a young big man about high school named Johnny that convinces his friend Mary to help him cheat so that he can be on the student council. When caught, the student council has a meeting about him, and kicks him off the student council. They ask you if it was right for Johnny to cheat and right for everyone to kick Johnny off the student council. Frankly, real life contradicts this short.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
it doesn't seem like cheating once Mike, Servo and Crow watch it
lee_eisenberg18 May 2006
Another "educational" film from the "Duck and Cover" age, in this case focusing on a student who copies from a classmate's paper. "Cheating" is only memorable because on "MST3K", Dr. Forrester made Mike, Servo and Crow watch it before he showed them "The Wild World of Batwoman". This leads Crow to copy something off of Gypsy's paper, so Mike and Servo do to Crow what the people in the short film do to the student.

Thank God that we have "MST3K" to rip at these boring movies. If anything, this movie alone is enough to make anyone want to cheat on a test. Dreadful.

So what would I do? Trash this movie a little more.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What Johnny did is nothing compared to what they do these days.
Aaron137519 February 2012
Yes, Johnny did not have time to study for his test so he had to use poor Mary who is so smart. It worked once, will it continue to do so? Ha, these days most kids use their smart phones to look up answers, use the internet to copy essays and have no need for copying. Sorry for being so cynical, but I earned my 3.90 GPA in college, earned my degree actually putting forth some effort and it just irks me how many people simply do shortcuts so yes, Johnny should be burned for his transgression! Seriously I do not like cheaters, do not like liars and can not stand their parents who will take up for them and provide them the means to cheat. Of course, poor Johnny does not seem to have any parents to be seen, at least not in this short. Meanwhile, the moronic student council full of a bunch of most likely hypocrites, decides Johnny's fate. One has to wonder why Johnny needed to study for an algebra test as it is math, really no studying involved. Perhaps go over a few problems to make sure you know who to calculate your answer, but studying really should not be a factor. And what of the teacher? How could she miss it the first time? When your student makes an A on his math test and simply has answers rather than a page full of problems being worked out, it would make me suspicious, sure a person can work it out in their mind, but I am betting poor Johnny never has.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dire consequences-
Douglas_Holmes9 October 2002
Big Youth on School Grounds Johnny Taylor gets his friend, Mary, to help him cheat on his Algebra test. In time, he slides further and further into the dark world of school cheating, until he is caught and publicly degraded- his friends now hate him, his girlfriend is disgraced, he is totally humiliated and -horror of horrors- he is booted off the School Council. You get the feeling that his life is, effectively, ruined forever by the trauma. Oh, the shame of it all!

The lighting and sets would have been appropriate in a Fritz Lang film like "Metropolis," "Mabuse- der Spieler," or "M". All is eerie foreboding and miasmic horror.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Johnny's first step to a life of crime... *SPOILERS*
quamp29 May 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This short film basically tells of Johnny, who cheats so he can stay on the student council. After getting caught, the student council kicks him off. It was about as exciting to watch as paint dry. Rightfully skewered on Mystery Science Theater 3000 with the film "The Wild World of Bat Woman" this short would be very forgettable without Mike and the bots.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
To cheat, or not to cheat? That is the question.
johnny_burnaway27 January 2017
Johnny's got a problem. Algebra just doesn't compute in his head, but he needs that math grade or his position on the student council is kaput. Rather than doubling his study time or approaching his teacher for help, he immediately hits on the idea of cheating and runs with it.

In keeping with the sense of nihilism conveyed by the gloomy cinematography, it feels like everyone in this short is out to screw everyone else over. Johnny shamelessly pries test answers from his friend Mary, Johnny's friend Jim pulls him away from his studies despite his protestations, and when Johnny's cheating comes to light, the entire student body exiles him to the farthest reaches of social pariahdom. And the student council? These Young Americans try, convict, and execute Johnny in absentia, thus showing that the status quo of the early 50's must be maintained even at the cost of due process (a subtle but daring criticism of the then-contemporary House Un- American Activities Committee).

Though not as prominent as their handling of the main theme, the filmmakers include a cursory subtextual exploration of guilt and its effects on the psyche. While it's never given any voice other than an incorporeal appearance by Johnny's teacher as he contemplates his crossing of the line, there are hints that the pressures weighing on Johnny have pushed him to the breaking point. His final act of cheating clearly doubles as a cry for help. As humiliating as it surely was to be exposed as a scholastic criminal, a profound sense of relief must have accompanied Johnny on his long walk to Miss Granby's desk to receive his destiny.

In those staid early days, it's possible that cheating on a test may have erupted into the kind of scandal depicted here. Though we leave him at a crossroads (Will he redeem himself? Drop out of school and hit the road a la Jack Kerouac? Start selling drugs on campus?), the implication of this short is that it's all over for Johnny.

Let the MST3k crew guide you through this existential wasteland. You'll love it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Right from Wrong. don't do THIS...
ksf-231 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Clearly produced for a younger crowd, this short shows the dangers and results of cheating on a test. Arden Booth narrates this boring short from the 1950's, and seems to be the only credited cast member. Johnny asks his friend for the answers on a test, and is promptly drummed off the student council. Yawn. Director Herk Harvey started as an actor, and moved into directing shorts and documentaries. did I mention, big yawn?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cheating is bad. Enabling cheating is fine though.
monoceros46 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Yeah, it was wrong of Johnny to cheat, but look at what else we see: Mary feeds him answers without a second thought but is credited with no blame because she "was only trying to help". Jim pressures Johnny to blow off his homework. The student council goes behind Johnny's back to eject him without giving him a chance to defend himself. I ended up feeling kind of sorry for Johnny at the end.

The omnipresent narration, berating Johnny non-stop for his moral bankruptcy, reminds me of the Alfred Hitchcock style narration in "The Last Hungry Cat", the Merrie Melodies cartoon where Sylvester the Cat is tortured with guilt because he thinks he ate Tweety Bird.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"I am not a crook...."
Mike Sh.18 August 2002
I'm not sure I understand the need to trash instructional short films of this type; not only did they serve a purpose of sorts in their time, but they're very entertaining to watch today. While they might make us smile condescendingly, their innocence and nostalgic charm cannot but win us over.

In "Cheating" a pre-adolescent Richard Nixon, who calls himself John Taylor, yields to the temptation of getting the answers to an algebra test from Mary, his bookworm of a girlfriend. This leads to a prolonged cheating jag, which in turn disgraces Mary the Bookworm, and ends his own budding political career ("You won't have John Taylor to kick around anymore!"). Throughout the film, John's sense of dread over his pending disgrace is mirrored by the Expressionistic lighting and bleak set design.

Of course, it might be supposed that John Taylor's downfall in high school prefigured his later downfall as President. Perhaps his humiliation here fed his paranoia, which in turn led to the political dirty tricks which ended in his resignation and subsequent exile in San Clemente.

Maybe if Mary had better explained the solving of quadratic equations, we might have spared Watergate and our nation's concomitant crisis of confidence in its governmental institutions.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An unusual offering from Centron
arthurblock5 May 2009
(Note: Although I really enjoyed the MST3K treatment of "Cheating", I'm commenting here on the original version, sans wisecracking robots.)

For this parable on the downside of cheating on school tests, director Herk Harvey gets a bit more experimental than is typical for these outings. The opening scene is dominated by an eerily lit pendulum clock that casts an ominous shadow on protagonist John Taylor as he awaits a phone call. This clock's slow ticking, measuring the passing time, is a recurring theme of the short. This certainly must be the aspect of "Cheating" that has made at least a couple reviewers compare it to the German expressionist style of film making.

From something out of "M", there's an abrupt transition to a scene reminiscent of 'The Telephone Hour' in "Bye-Bye Birdie". At this point, the story continues in flashback, with a narrator. Oddly, he addresses his remarks not to the viewer but to John (except for a brief aside to Mary and the "What would you do?" questions to the audience at the end). Most of the rest of the film is in the standard no-one-moves-much-during-a-take style of these Centron productions, with acting about as wooden as it's possible to be. However, there's at least one more stylistic oddity. The night after his first, successful cheating, John is haunted in bed by an apparition - the disembodied head of his teacher. This reminds me of a convention used in old romance comics, of all things!

While films like this certainly aren't great art, they are utterly fascinating as expressions of the concerns of their era. With its unusual approach, "Cheating" (along with "The Other Fellow's Feelings", in my opinion) is a stand-out of the genre.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uh-oh, I am going to hell for cheating! (being sarcastic here ^_^)
Mitora-san22 December 2002
This short I seen on MST3K alongside Latin American cult film, "Wild World of Batwoman". It is about a poor dumb sap named Johnny, whom cheats with his "Girlfriend" Merry and at first is sucessful, but the second time around though, it is total misery. Kicked out of student council, being hated by everybody in the school and breaking up with Merry. Now where the hell are Johnny's parents? Is he orphan or something?

Geez, I was caught cheating in grade school once, but the punishment was NOT *that* severe.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed