(1974)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Late-in-the-game softcore porn that should have been XXX
lor_10 January 2011
Lately I've been seeing many regular films with hardcore inserts -perfectly good films ranging from Ornella Muti's debut THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WIFE to Rene Daalder's MASSACRE AT CENTRAL HIGH, but spiced up in the late '70s for porn playoff. LOVE GAMES is the opposite: a 1976 movie that should by all rights have been filmed as a hardcore movie but instead is a silly softcore tease.

Director Ed De Priest is a familiar name, listed on the crew of innumerable soft & hard porn pics back in the day. Why he and distributor Manuel S. Conde pegged this project as soft X is a mystery. It lacks the production values and "real movie" feel of a drive-in or action house picture, and plays more like a typical "weekend wonder", but where are the insertions & money shots? I can see an exhibitor or booker scratching his head with a silent "WTF?" reaction when it was screened back in 1976. More about that key issue later.

The story is old-hat in the extreme: a trio of con artists, two nondescript guys and femme fatale Claudine Benet (actually Alice Fredlund) prey on dumb guys. The scam is to have stewardess Benet seduce the mark, and then during sex her "husband" and the other confederate barge in, Benet pretends to shoot her husband, and the mark pays up in hefty blackmail money.

They do this to hapless Ed (an uncredited old coot who doesn't mind showing his Johnson on-screen in a soft porn movie), who later hires private eye Rick Taylor to track down the creepy criminals who bilked him out of $25,000.

Taylor is played (I should say overplayed) by Marc Brock, a familiar face from soft porn who I've seen in numerous 1-day wonders, notably COUSIN BETTY and THE GOOD FAIRY. Here he's Mr. Motormouth -constantly making in-joke movie references (a poor man's Michael Weatherly from TV series "NCIS"), and seemingly auditioning who-woulda-thunk-it acting skills for a hoped-for mainstream movie assignment (never happened).

As Taylor's new secretary we have the wonderful Sharon Kelly/Colleen Brennan, oddly outfitted with a Gabrielle Drake wig circa "UFO" or AU PAIR GIRLS. Brennan shows those money-making breasts and has a couple of minor sex scenes, but her comic abilities are foolishly misused here -compare with her brilliant work in ALICE GOODBODY.

The episodic script, which makes the film seem as long as EXODUS, has another scam hooker/stewardess with a British accent named Samantha doing the same routine on another mark. She gets down and dirty and threatens to move the film into its desired XXX slot, as she puts the John in bondage, straps on a dildo and forces him to suck it; later she puts Fredlund through the routine.

Taylor succeeds in outfoxing the villains, but there is a series of unconvincing plot twists that pad the film out interminably. I will avoid giving any spoilers, since these twists are about all there is to keep you awake, but a late in the film lengthy flashback is very poorly done, begs to be hardcore (and recast, so we don't have to look at flabby old Ed's body whomping away), and even breaks flashback rules, as the woman telling it is not privy to all the content presented to us.

Several false endings include the pointless insertion of Buck Flower as a police detective.

Not very pretty Fredlund, who sports an overall tan and huge breasts as her drawing cards, managed to make the big time just once, featured in John Cassavetes' classic THE KILLING OF A Chinese BOOKIE. Her uninhibited costar as "Samantha" remains anonymous.

This one's strictly for fans of very bad jokes, idiotic patter, and very fake simulated sex. The distributor Manuel S. Conde is sort of the Chaplin of porn: just as Chaplin insisted on making silent films many years after everybody else in the world had switched over to sound, Conde ended his career distributing lame-duck softcore X movies (notably THE ALL-American WOMAN and DEEP JAWS) long after XXX had replaced them. That probably is the reason why so obvious a hardcore opus as this one was shot softcore instead.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The last real chance to ogle the magnificent Miss Friedland
MerkinMuffly18 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I have the SW video of this little gem which stars Alice Friedland, here for some reason billed as Claudine Benet(playing Sharon Mills). I don't know what the previous reviewer was looking at when he described Alice as "not very good looking". He may want to get his testosterone levels checked, because Alice is magnificent. I agree with the description on the SW Video DVD jacket---"an angular blonde with hefty hooters and a divine a$$....that resembles Bridget Fonda". Sure, here she is 6-7 years older than when she broke loose those gigantic natural breasts in the classic "Cindy and Donna" soft core drive-in flick in 1970. Her face is a little more world weary than her fresh faced teen appearance in Cindy and Donna, but she is certainly a gorgeous woman, and her ample assets are still spectacular. She is in multiple sex scenes here, as is the legendary hard core porn actress Sharon Kelly (later known as Colleen Brennan). I agree this easily could have turned into a hard core porn flick, so its somewhat of an oddity appearing in 1976 as a soft core movie with such an obvious sexploitation plot. She had her one big break into the mainstream with a role in Killing of a Chinese Bookie with Ben Gazzara, but apparently more Hollywood roles didn't follow, so she reverted back to her soft core porn roots. Her filmography seems to stop around 1976-77, so its curious as to what became of the mouthwatering Alice Friedland. I am grateful to search and find what I can of Miss Friedland, even if some of the roles are small and uncredited. Here, she is the main character and rewards us with ample views of her breathtaking curves, and for that reason alone, this is well worth it. My only complaint would be that at the conclusion, as Sharon Kelly is getting down and dirty on her boss in the office, Alice walks in, sits down and asks "Can I watch" and begins touching herself, and the viewer is anticipating a nice 3 way scene coming up. The movie then abruptly ends, which makes me wonder whether there was some footage cut, or if this was the filmmaker's twisted humor to end this nasty piece of sleaze with a tease like that.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed