Jin nian xia tian (2001) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Very average
heywood10012 February 2003
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** Apparently, this is the first ever Chinese lesbian film. It's also a bit of a mess. Nothing much happens in the first hour and a half - the main character mopes around, goes on some blind dates, washes an elephant, and wonders how to break the news that she's a lesbian to her fiercely traditional mother. The only thing that threatens to break the spell of boredom is the arrival of her ex-lover, now on the run from the police for killing her father.

Unfortunately, all she does is mope around and look sad because the main character has a new girlfriend. Then, five minutes from the end she somehow gets spotted by the police and ends up killing some police officers in a shoot-out in the elephant enclosure. It's probably the closest the film gets to anything really interesting.

Overall, the film is rather ugly, rather boring, and rather low on plot. If you've got nothing better to do it'll while away a couple of hours, but I wouldn't recommend it.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Big disappointment!
zzmale15 December 2003
The literal translation of the title of this movie is: This Summer.

This first Chinese lesbian movie had better fate than the first Chinese gay movie, East Palace, West Palace, but the quality of this film is far from East Palace, West Palace. This is a lousy attempt to follow the footstep of East Palace, West Palace in exploring homosexuality, except this time for women, but the clumsy stories of abuse and old love made this film appears to be a typical Women with Hard Time film on Life Time TV Channel with an added twist of Lesbian Love Triangle.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Banal. Banal. Banal.
William Bannister7 January 2003
I'm not going to pontificate here, I've not got the time, but after just finishing this film, I'm utterly gutted. It's beyond terrible. Poor production values, terrible acting, a nonexistant storyline and the most irratating editing - most scenes last 4 seconds, but the shots of characters nonchalantly staring at the floor must rake up three quarters of the running time. This film lacks a direction, a strong (hell, a weak narrative even) any sort of quantifiable production and the direlogue irritates with scene after scene of "Why don't you have a boyfriend?" (To a lesbian). Long pause. Next scene "Why don't you have a lover like me?" (long pause)...

Godawful. Avoid like the plague.
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Amateurish and Boring
JamesHitchcock14 May 2004
I came across this film when it was recently shown on Channel 4 here in Britain, and was surprised by it in two ways. The first reason for my surprise was that I did not expect to find a film from the puritanical People's Republic of China dealing with the subject of lesbianism. Presumably it was this unexpected combination of national provenance and subject-matter that persuaded Channel 4 to screen it, because the second reason for my surprise was that I could not understand why a respected broadcaster would bother itself with such an amateurish production.

The central character, Xiao Qun, an elephant keeper at a zoo, is involved in a lesbian relationship with another young woman, Xiao Ling. There are two strands to the plot. One concerns Qun's efforts to hide her lesbianism from her deeply conservative mother, who is determined to get her daughter married before the age of thirty. The second concerns Qun's former lover Junjun, who reappears in her life on the run from the police. These two strands are never integrated well, and the result is that the film is a very uneasy mixture of social comedy and crime drama.

All the roles are played by amateur actors, and it shows. None of them makes any convincing attempt to convey feeling or emotion. Even worse, however, is the embarrassingly bad direction. All the devices with which we are familiar from more professionally made films- the close-up, the zooming shot, the use of cross-cutting from one speaker to another- seem to be absent. The result is that the film seems to consist of a series of conversations, badly lit and shot with a static camera in longshot, interspersed with lengthy shots in which nothing at all happens in the way of either action or dialogue. I can say that this was the most boring film I have seen in a long time. I can only hope that the late hour at which Channel 4 showed it meant that not too many viewers watched it; given the brilliant work being done by the likes of Zhang Yimou and Chen Kaige I would not like anyone to think that this travesty is in any way typical of modern Chinese cinema. 3/10.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I liked it a lot.
fabriceboltho1 October 2021
Naturalistic, touching, humorous and making use of a non professional cast I liked it a lot.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed