Founding Brothers (TV Movie 2002) Poster

(2002 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The "self evident" truths were intensely debated in America's first years.
movie_imdb13 April 2005
The "self evident" truths were intensely debated in America's first years. Washington, Franklin, Hamilton, Jefferson, Adams, Madison and Burr struggled to transform their desperate visions into an enduring government.

Based on Joseph Ellis's Pulittzed Prize winning book, Founding Brothers examines six moments when the collision and collusions of these towering figures left an indelible imprint on the nation: the secret dinner that determined the site of the capital and America's financial future; Benjamin Franklin's call for an end to slavery; George Washington's farewell address to the nation; John Adams's term as president; Hamilton and Burr's famous and fatal duel; and the final reconciliation between Adams and Jefferson.

Drawing on the words of the founders and incisive commentary from leading scholars, Founding Brothers is an elegant and engaging portrait of America's origins in personal conflict and compromise.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Content but Wooden Acting
lavatch5 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
In this History Channel documentary from 2002, there were good commentators and a decent narrative account of the American founders in the two decades following the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.

Hour One

The opening program reviewed the major players who shaped the American nation's identity following the Revolutionary War: Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, and Franklin. But it was Alexander Hamilton who served as second in command during the presidency of George Washington. With his intellect and genius for finance, Hamilton served to get the fledgling nation on its feet. One of the last acts of elder statesman Benjamin Franklin was his endorsement of the abolition of slavery in order to remain true to the nation's ideals.

Hour Two

The second program covers the decade of the 1790s and the two terms in office of President George Washington that was based in Philadelphia. What powers did the Constitution grant to the federal government? That question was answered in a set of growing pains and the evolution of political parties. For historian Joseph Ellis, the U.S. Constitution is a set of ambiguous precepts that required experimentation. A key development was on February 25, 1791 when President Washington signs into law Hamilton's bank bill. The furor after the Jay Treaty led to bitter political party rivalry and the permanent rift between Washington and Jefferson. Washington's Farewell Address stressed the importance of "America First" in foreign affairs.

Hour Three

With Washington's retirement, a new era began with an ideological struggle represented by the contrary positions of Hamilton and Jefferson. This was an age of political intrigue with caustic and slanderous accusations made in the press. When John Adams was elected president, he was essentially alone with both his vice-president and cabinet members opposed to his policies. Adams' #1 crisis was the possibility of war with France. His diplomatic efforts led to the XYZ scandal with corrupt French officials. What followed was the Quasi War. A surge in popularity resulted for Adams and a downward spiral for the other Federalists. Adams's greatest confidante was his wife Abigail. But she gave him poor advice in enacting the Alien and Sedition Acts. In an "angry snit," Adams dismissed two of his cabinet members and had a falling out with Hamilton. But Adams' crowning achievement was peace with France, though he would leave office a lonely man.

Hour Four

On March 4, 1801, Thomas Jefferson wrote one of the most famous of presidential inaugural addresses. He also penned a phony letter that appeared in print in newspapers with the attempt of singing his own praises. This was an age where character assassination was prevalent in newspapers. As president, Jefferson's goal was to establish "pure republicanism" in the nation that included participatory government. The greatest challenge of Jefferson's presidency was how to deal with the war in Europe. His controversial embargo plan led to outrage among merchants, but it also kept America out of the war.

********

A theme that was effectively traced through the programs was the unbounded sense of Enlightenment optimism of the founders. In production values the series was not as successful. The acting was stiff and stilted, and the program would have been stronger without the amateur dramatizations, which came across as ludicrous pantomimes. The strength was in the biographical profiles and the political highlights from the period of 1788-1808.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
How could you make this any better?
planktonrules13 December 2011
I loved this documentary for two main reasons. First, the period covering our first three Presidents is pretty much a void for documentaries--especially the terms of George Washington. Considering how important they were in setting precedents and working through what, exactly, the office entails, it's the most important period in the nation's history---but it's something most Americans know almost nothing-- about although they certainly should. Second, the show was made so exquisitely. Although you don't have photos, video and the like for this time period, the filmmakers used actors to recreate some scenes as well as the voice talents of some VERY prestigious actors--which, I am surprised the History Channel could afford--including James Woods, Michael York Hal Holbrook and others. In addition, the wonderful historian David McCullough participated--which is important as he's written perhaps the best book on John Adams. All in all, there's nothing not to like and I have no criticism whatsoever--and that's very rare! Excellent history and enjoyable from start to finish. It's made up up four episodes totaling about three hours--and they seemed to go by very quickly.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Regarding Hanmilton/Burr
fairlending28 May 2023
The History channel's portrayal of Hamilton and Burr is so misleading and deceptive, painting an fictional portrait of these men. In regard to Burr stating he had a brief stint in the army, False. He became a hero several times prior to being wounded. His efforts to carry the dead General Montgomery off the battlefield and designing the 5000 man retreat from New York. After the war he became the top lawyer in New York, often beating Hamilton in court and besting him in the creation of the Bank of Manhattan. Throughout Burr's life he was constantly supporting young men in their education with his own funds ( see John Vanderlyn and Burr). Burr was a very loving father bringing up his daughter Theodosia to be one of the first "modern women", well versed in math, science, language and the arts., thanks to her dad. Never known to speck ill of any man and well liked, as shown in the original election results of 1800. His failure to turn the election over to Jefferson created an intense hatred of him by Jefferson. Jefferson would later have him tried for treason for an attempt to extricate Texas from Mexico. Burr was found not guilty and the damning letter supposedly written by Burr was later proved to be a forgery written by General Wilkinson.

Hamilton on the other hand was constantly speaking ill and seeding intrigue behind the backs of his contemporaries his entire life. Today he would be described as sleezy. Disloyal to his wife, his president (John Adams) and encouraging his son to fight a duel to cement his son's future political career. The history channel describes the Reynolds scandal as insider trading. False. It was the passing of rumors that the veterans of the revolution would not be receiving the money owed from the government's IOUs, allowing Reynolds to buy them at a rate of 10cents on the Dollar. The scheme was dependent upon Hamilton, as Secretary of the Treasury, not publicly disputing the rumor. When Hamilton's involvement was proven, he challenged Monroe to a duel. Burr stepped in and negotiated peace between the two men.

Many regard Hamilton's death as "Suicide by Burr". Burr wrote multiple time to Hamilton in an effort to avoid "an interview". Hamilton chose the interview, bringing large caliber pistols. Prior to the commencement of the duel, Hamilton put on his eye glasses and sighted in his pistol, making his intention very clear. Instead of firing his shot into the ground, he raised his pistol and shot in Burr's direction, sealing his fate.

In the spring of 1836 Sam Houston would annex Texas from Mexico. Burr would die later that year, yesterday's traitor, todays hero.

In conclusion, the reader may wish to read "Life of Aaron Burr" by J. Parton. Written shortly after Burr's death, it contains numerous antidotes from his contemporaries, both good and bad, and will give the reader an honest look at who Aaron Burr was, and not the completely false picture painted by the history channel.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed