The Gunman (2004) Poster

(2004)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
"V" as in "Vapid"
sol121822 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** Listless and confusing made or TV movie about a masked, who also seems to be wearing a scuba-diving outfit, vigilante who's out on the streets of Austin Texas taking out child abusers, in many cases their fathers, and pedophiles.

When Officer Ben Simms', Sean Partick Flaney, wife Lori, Alaina Kalanj, is gunned down trying to protect her daughter Cassie, Emma Nicolas, from being kidnapped by registered sex offender John Cutter, Steve Krieger, he completely loses it in him going out of his way in enforcing the law when it comes to sexual predators and offenders. Instead of being given, before he kills someone in his custody, a desk job Simms is put on the case of the vigilante child sex abusers killings which he's very much, the vigilante's actions, in favor of. It's very obvious from the start that both the citizens of Austin as well members of the Austin Police Department are the least interested in capturing the vigilante in that he's cleaning up the streets of the city of dangerous sex offenders. This becomes very clear when a very reluctant Simms is given Daphne Jocelyn, Joey Lauren Adams, as his partner in finding and arresting the vigilante. Having been working in traffic court, giving out parking tickets, a major criminal case like this is usually given to a much more experienced cop who handlers homicides and kidnappings then a green rookie as well as ticket writer like Daphne is! Which shows how unconcerned the higher ups in the police department are in catching the vigilante.

Later Cutter in his trying to kidnap little Brianna, Joanne McCray, in a local park is confronted by the masked vigilante who quickly, with his expertise of the martial arts, puts him away with a cracked skull and a few broken bones. It's at Cutter's arraignment that two unexpected things happen. Simms trying to take the law into is own hands-Jack Ruby-style- and gun Cutter down on the steps of Hall of Justice is beaten to the punch by the vigilante! The vigilante hiding on a garage roof overlooking the Hall of Justice puts a high powered bullet through Cutter-bulletproof vest and all-before Simms could even get off a single shot!

The rest of the movie has you guessing just who this vigilante is who, after icing Cutter, escaped from being captured by Simms' partner Officer Roland,Brian MaNamara, with what seems like something, a flying teaser, straight out of Batmans's famed utility belt! Soon the vigilante angle of the movie starts to get a bit tiring in that he's able to pick up police radio calls, from what looks like his state-of-the-art control center, that puts him a step ahead of the police who, like Officer Simms, are not at all interested in capturing him.

***SPOILER*** It's only when Simm's daughter Cassie is later kidnapped that the film, after almost putting you to sleep, again becomes interesting! You know that Cassie's kidnapper can't be the late John Cutter who earlier murder her mom, as he unsuccessfully tried to kidnap her, so who in blazes can he be! It takes Officer Joceyn, and the vigilante who's listening in on her radio calls, to figure out who Cassie's kidnapper is. He turns out to be someone who has very close connections to not only Simms & Joceyn but to the late John Cutter himself! And that sets up the movies unbelievable final sequence where the mysterious vigilante's identity is reviled but also, which is far more surprising, how totally impossible, in the condition he's in, he could have pulled off what he did all throughout the entire movie!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Average
potless6 August 2004
I generally like to watch independent films as opposed to the big Hollywood productions especially when a subject tends to be controversial. I was generally dissatisfied with this movie and it isn't to do with just one thing but several things which niggle at the back of my mind. The plot could have been the basis of a really good story, working policeman investigating missing children finds himself emotionally involved when his wife is shot to prevent his daughter being snatched, but the story rapidly settles into a tried and tested formula and inconsistencies creep in such as if you are going to shoot a woman you aren't going to leave the daughter behind if she was your goal. I'm not sure if it was the way the film was edited but there were continuity problems, perhaps it was felt that the film had to be shorter but sometimes I felt that I had missed something somewhere like missing a page of a book. I guessed who the assassin was but there was no reason why the child snatcher became what he was. Perhaps I demand too much it was a good effort on a difficult subject but better direction and editing would have made a the storyline better
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Among the worst movies I have ever seen
chinaguy1235 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Not a true spoiler but does describe a scene late in the film.

I registered for this service simply to express my amazement that films like this can find financing. The plot is clichéd and ridiculous (a cop with a murdered wife and new partner, battling a vigilante?), there are numerous repetitive scenes, the characters are unsubtly written and generally highly unbelievable, and to top it off there is a clumsily-delivered religious message. Poor Mimi Rogers.

Are we expected to believe the scene in the parking garage with the vigilante scuffling down the side? The escape is so unlikely but that is conveniently ignored because the plot requires the vigilante to get away.

Last, it is difficult to imagine anyone unironically enjoying the song "Goodnight Erin" that plays through the credits. Utterly uncomfortable to watch/listen to. For friends of the film-maker only.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not even suitable for ironing ...
markadmoore4 June 2019
I wasn't expecting much, chose this to have on while I did some ironing, something to half watch.

I turned it off about 10 minutes in. Amateur hour acting and script.

Doesn't work for ironing, might work for gardening, if you get my meaning ...
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Predictable!
arno.f@hetnet.nl7 April 2004
Let me start of, by saying that this was not a bad movie. There's is enough going on to make you want to sit through it to the end. The movie also builds up quit nicely. Also the actors are adequate, not the best actors I've seen on screen, but certainly not the worst either. Mimi Rogers shows she can still act, especially in the final scene. Big emotions here, but played in a very genuine way. The one big flaw however is the movie's predictability. Already from about 1/4 in the movie on you can pretty much tell, what every character's role is in the plot. The movie would have worked much better as a thriller, when this would have been avoided.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A great movie which causes discussions
dex_sf31 May 2006
A PROMISE KEPT has a very interesting and unusual plot, the adaption is thrilling without the limitations it probably would have received if it was a big studio production, it has a good camera, an excellent soundtrack and very professional lead actors.

Sean Patrick Flanery and Mimi Rogers are great, Emma Nicholas and Brian McNamara excellent and Tom Wright could have a bit more screen time. Jeff Speakman ads a lot of color to the movie.

The plot surely causes discussions, and that's more than you can say about 95% of the movies. It's a good idea to watch it with friends, an interesting and probably controversial discussion afterwards is guaranteed.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Above average film on a tough subject
Jynne20 August 2003
"A Promise Kept" deals with the subject of vigilantism (and another subject which you'll have to see for yourself). However, unlike most movies the scenes are well handled and tastefully done, and some scenes have very little (if any) dialogue - I found that to be refreshing because most American films tend to have the characters explain EVERY SINGLE emotion or thought, and some scenes just don't need words.

The fight scenes looked a bit choppy to me - perhaps they were edited too much (being a student of the martial arts I admit I'm a little biased in that area). I recommend that people check it out and decide for themselves.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
holes in the story and the sound track suxs
mc_schultz10 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
i saw it at the video store and thought the idea was cool, but . . . . despite the cool idea, the movie was terrible.

there are so many holes in the story, but since i can't remember the characters names, i will not take the time and effort to say much. just a couple of points:

1) why does the vigilante wear goggles and a mask in the comfort of the high-tech vigilante spy room? 2) why does the molester cop fight with his molester brother if they are in cahoots. 3) why is the molester cop a molester? this is never explained. 4) are parents and babysitters really that oblivious to molesters walking around in the middle of the play in plain sight and right in front of them? 5) how does the vigilante get all of these cameras all over the place?

and many more, but since the movie was so bad, i don't feel like spending more time and effort in complaining. just enough to vent for the anger of wasting $1.00 at the video store.

one more thing, the sound track suxs too. i almost hit the mute button.

mcs
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good movie!
imanactress4life13 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed the movie so much!

I thought most of the actors were great. I really enjoyed Sean Patrick Flanery, Joey Lauren, Brian Mcnamara, Mimi Rogers, and all of the other adults acting. I really enjoyed the movie.

I thought that the child who played "Brianna" was very good, and very realistic in the abduction scene.

The music was wonderful, and I thought it accompanied the movie well.

Daniel Millican is a fabulous director, and did fabulous. I think that this movie is good, because it lets you know what really could be/is happening out there, and it's important to know.

All in all, I really enjoyed it.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
excellent!
filmzealot11 July 2004
When comparing The Gunman to other Independent films, this one stands out as one of the best.

Taking on tough themes like God, justice, and vigilantism is never easy and should be applauded when it is done in such an excellent fashion as writer/director Daniel Millican has accomplished.

Mimi Rogers and Brian McNamara performances were quite good with a powerful monologue by Mimi at the end.

A great film and a great story.

I look forward to Daniel's next project.

FZ
8 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black belts doing demo in beginning
splinterman27 November 2004
The highest ranking member is a 7th Degree black which happens to be one stripe more than the star Jeff Speakman. The 7th Degree black belts name is Sr. Professor Brian Duffy and he has a school in Austin for the last 31 years. The Black belt across from him is one of his few ( 12 to date ).The other Black belts in the line are also school owners from San Antonio ,North Austin and Dallas.One of the body double for Mimi rogers during martial arts scenes was Mr. Duffy's daughter , Angela . As for the movie I thought it was a good idea but not quite all there. Without saying too much because I think its a movie that has merit , I was disturbed and am still disturbed when certain kids songs are played which to me means the movie really touched me on some level. Chilling choice of kids songs..
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great little-known film
aullray19 July 2004
This was an awesome movie that was well-acted. Sean Patrick Flanery was a great choice for the lead character, having done other vengeance-related movies (Boondock Saints). The soundtrack to this film was really good. Especially the use of Skillet's "Will You Be There" in the dramatic scene. I'm not too sure about the film's rating of "R" because it has a great spiritual message that should be seen by teens. Also, it is obvious that the intentions of the filmmakers are to get a specific message about human vengeance across to the viewers of this film. Granted, the subject matter of vengeance against pedophiles isn't exactly kiddie material, but it should be at least PG-13. I really enjoyed this movie and can't wait to see other releases from Serendipitous Films.
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a Heart Wrenching movie
mike-higgins-14 December 2006
Man, talk about a lot of emotional stuff going on! Wow! What with all of the child predators and related things in the news today, this movie, even though it was made 4 years ago, really hits home and hits in the gut. Sean Patrick Flannery does a fine job in portraying a cop who is torn between doing his job and letting a vigilante "finish the job" plus personal problems on top of that. A little bloody for me at times but a well done indie movie. It was good to see Mimi Rogers in such a powerful role. And glad to see Joey Lauren Adams on film again. She makes it believable that her character has to overcome past problems and current anti-female cop male officers in order to prove herself capable of doing her job.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed