As It Is in Heaven (2004) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
107 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
A wonderful and Moving Film
dsmith-5716 January 2005
This film, recently voted as an audience favorite at the 2005 Palm Springs International Film Festival, is inspiring and moving. A famous conductor, forced to retire by illness, returns to the small village of his birth to become the leader of the church choir, and finally find fulfillment in his music. Drawing on Sweedish traits of keeping things within oneself and of the insular character of a small Swedish village, this film develops each of its characters well. superbly directed, acted and sung, it brought tears to many eyes, and smiles to all. Hopefully it will find distribution in the United States.

If you can, see it!
76 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Movie that you keep thinking about
aanderberg21 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of those movies that you keep thinking about when you wake up the next morning. It will give you that warm, fuzzy feeling and leave you with a smile on your face.

Sure, we get fed the typical stereotype characters and stories, but it does do the trick: Entertain.

Being from Sweden and living in the US for quite sometime, it is funny how we react. "The deadbeat husband is going to kill him", "She (Gabriella) is going to die and then there will be a heartbreaking larger-than-life ending". We know how these things work, everything comes together at the end. And it did. The characters were somewhat simple, they were so elaborate that you didn't really think twice about it, nothing was really left for your own imagination. The closest would probably be Siv, she makes you ask yourself if she indeed was in love with Daniel, but that's about it.

But the movie is beautiful, set in rural Norrland, the music is absolutely amazing and the characters are lovable. Michael Nyqvist is truly genius, with his crazy unique look and Frida Hallberg is charming and approachable. Maybe a little too nice.

But most of all this movie makes you feel, and that is the most important thing. You cry, you laugh, you hate and you identify. I don't know about you guys, but that does not happen that often.
42 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sense of Community Amidst the Snows
mandrew20 May 2006
Kay Pollak's 2004 heart-warmer Så som i himmelen/ As it is in Heaven contains every stereotype of Swedish humanity and inhumanity yet manages to be a crowd-pleaser. It contains plenty of ammunition for cynical critics, continuity error-spotters and for saccharine-debunkers, yet manages to depict the colours of life in a small community evocatively. The film also runs the gamut of proverbial messages about 'finding one's own voice' and 'just doing it despite one's fear', without completely removing the lump from the throats of the cynics.

Its success as a crowd pleaser comes from two facts. Firstly, small films about strangers bringing new life to rural Christian communities provide plenty of scope for the exposure of hypocrisy while at the same time allowing repressed characters to break out of their hairshirts. The same year and with a similarly Swedish breeze, The Queen of Sheba's Pearls did it, and Babette's Feast also comes to mind. Secondly, any film about small communities taking on the whole wide world will strike a human chord in our increasingly individual/self- focused and impersonalized world. This film's structural similarity with the likes of The Full Monty, Brassed Off, Calendar Girls and On a Clear Day shows its indebtedness to the formula. But it is a formula with life left in it yet, and this seems to be because people need positive- message films that evoke a sense of community almost in spite of themselves.

The stranger is burned-out maestro Daniel Daréus on a quest for self-rediscovery. The town he visits, or rather revisits, is, unbeknownst to the townsfolk, the place of his childhood. He was bullied mercilessly by classmates here, supposedly because he was a sensitive musician without aspiration to drive a truck. Here, he takes the job of cantor/choirmaster, despite the usual suspicions of artists and outsiders. The place is, of course, populated by a wide range of recognizable types whose character arcs can be predicted: the broken-hearted, fair-haired girl so beautiful she nearly glows; the cellphone-ringing local businessman; the woman whose beauty is lost amidst domestic abuse; the steely pastor and his less austere wife, who at first seem right out of Ingmar Bergman. Also present: jealous, uptight spinster (Siv) (check); geriatric whose soul still sings (check); elderly couple who may have repressed desires for each other since kindergarten (check); obese person whose function is to point out we should not laugh and say 'fatty' (check); intellectually handicapped boy who proves able to sing a good 'A' (check).

Pollak's film is not all warm fuzzies, however. It diverts from the 'let's put on a show despite setbacks and moral opposition' sub-genre. It contains violence and an ending that might well be a metaphor for dying after achieving creative nirvana. The violence of the film is mostly a function of male anger and repression, but in never delves deeply into why the school bully who grows up into a wife beater is like this. Similarly, the small town Pastor so closely adheres to the moralistic, black-wearing super-Protestant stereotype, that his secret indulgence in girlie magazines is hardly surprising. His repressions and hypocrisies are just there, dangling unrelated to psychological reality. Perhaps the unexplained photograph of a young boy, a lost son perhaps, glimpsed once over his shoulder, holds the secret.

Perhaps these holes are functions of the editing, like several inconsistencies and continuity glitches that can be spotted, such as Siv's unexplained reappearance in the choir (twice) after moralistic outbursts. In fact none of the hitches in the film last very long and all seem resolved within a scene. Apart from in some awkward love scenes, the film's 127 minutes seldom drag, but there is a feeling that things may have been left on the cutting room floor.

The film remains solid three-star-fare despite the holes that can be picked in it. This is simply because in a world of technology-focused flicks and materialistic self-seeking, any glimpse of human community is, deep down, welcome for anyone, even the cynical.
39 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wonderful, inspiring film that touches important themes
notquitehonest29 January 2005
I really loved this movie and so did the audience that I saw it with in Los Angeles. After the film, lots of people were crying and saying how much the film had affected them. I can see why it was such a huge hit in its homeland, Sweden. The film is masterfully directed and each character brilliantly drawn so that by the end you really know these people and care about them. The music is very natural and the main song in the film quite heartbreaking but inspiring. Would definitely recommend this film for everyone to see - even people who don't normally go to subtitled films. Definitely deserved the Oscar Nomination because of the profound themes of the film reflected without pretension in a small-town community with everyday people. It is a film that unites us in this divided world and shows us the potential of the human spirit. A MUST SEE!
107 out of 132 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fantastic movie
marleen_verbeek21 August 2005
Wow I loved this movie! It is about normal life in a small village. About hypocrisy and honesty, love and surrender. Great! It is about things everybody encounters in life. You have to do things with passion. But some people will not appreciate your passion and will try to stop you. There are people who find the opinion of others and 'what will the neighbors think' more important than to follow their heart. Don't let anybody's opinion stop you from fulfilling your dreams and passion. I loved the fact that the actors were all really normal people, it could have been my family. No big beauties, but all people you fall in love with during the movie.
74 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a simple movie with an important message
stewardia26 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I was drawn to this movie the moment I saw a preview of it on Oscar night. When I read about Kay Pollak, I was hooked. We Americans are suckers for a comeback kid.

I understand this movie was a huge draw in Sweden. As a very provincial American I can only speculate on the reason. Perhaps it is because of the provocative joke that the Lena character makes at the beginning of the movie and other social comment but perhaps it is because of the central message which I believe has the same appeal everywhere in affluent societies.

The message of this movie for me is the same as the movie Titanic. Life is short people and as far as anyone really knows it's all we've got. It can be taken away at any time. So isn't it a pity that we spend so much time hiding behind walls separating us from other people because we're so afraid of being hurt? Tearing down the walls is painful but feeling alive lies on the other side of those wretched walls. Feeling alive is worth taking the risk. Give and you will receive. So start living NOW.

Many people are criticizing this movie for it's lack of characterization and other flaws. I say you are all pseudo-sophisticated. Get a grip folks, it's a parable, a fable for we affluent westerners who are materially rich but whose souls are in abject poverty.

So join a choir or a band or help build housing or distribute food for those less fortunate than you. Spread some joy and make the world a better place as long as you get out and commune with your fellow man. Writing a check is not enough. We are a social species by the way. Even the humblest of your fellow human beings can affect you in ways you never thought possible.

Rugged individualism has its place but it is over-rated.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A superb film, among the best I've ever seen.
tonymarciniec21 November 2005
First I was caught totally off guard by the film's initial lyricism and then I became totally enchanted with the unfolding story and engrossed with the brilliant directing. The characters were all fully developed, not bigger-than-life but just like the people we live among anywhere we are in the world, in Sweden, in Turkey or in America, all completely believable human beings with foibles and nobility. Hollywood could learn so much from this beautiful film. It shows that there is no need to go into every little detail behind every action to bring out the whole theme clear and bright, and that shows the brilliance of the director! Hearfelt thanks to Kay Pollak and the wonderful cast for this superb treat!!
51 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I am proud!
riona18 September 2004
I walked out of from this wonderful movie and felt really happy over the fact that a Swedish movie could be so fantastic!

Kay Pollack has found the Swedish spirit and the double standards of the Swedish Church's morality. You should not be happy- you shall only carry the shame of the sin. Just sit in the church and feel how the shame destroy you..

If you as I have grown up in a small village as Daniel, you recognize all the characters. The evil, the joy, the envy and the social network, the dreams...

The main actors were all very excellent in their performances. Maybe they got a bit theatrical in their monologues, but they are to be forgiven for that because they are some of Swedens best theatre actors. But I must say that I think the hole cast did a splendid job!
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Heartwarming Exploration of the Power of Music
cendrillon2322 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Through music, humans can express the yearnings of our souls and form deep bonds with those around us. Kay Pollack's Oscar nominated Film, As it is in Heaven, explores the power of music and the lasting effects it can have on a community. Despite the film's tired and overused plot line, it shines with complex, appealing characters and an exploration of both the relationships and the isolation the villagers feel among each other.

The film takes off running, and within the first ten minutes, Daniel (played by a brooding yet charming Michael Nyqvist) experiences childhood bullying, watches his mother die, becomes a world famous conductor, and has a heart attack while conducting in Milan. Thankfully, the movie slows down after this introduction, and Daniel settles into a quiet life in his old hometown to spend some time "listening". What follows is a standard formula–the town pastor, a fussy, sin-obsessed man, gives Daniel control over the ragtag band of villagers who make up the church choir. Daniel's passion to "create music that will open a person's heart" succeeds, and his arrival in the town triggers sweeping changes.

The film works due to its vivid characterization of individual members of the choir and their journeys to self-discovery once Daniel enables them to learn how to truly listen to themselves and each other. The choir, often acting as a group therapy session, enables the villagers (all a little broken in their own way) to reveal their secrets and frustrations.

A running theme throughout the film is that though the townspeople are incredibly close (in some cases, spending their entire lives together), they are often too apathetic or scared to address each other's clearly present problems. Arne has bullied Holmfrid for 35 years. Gabriella's husband (and Daniel's childhood bully) beats her everyday, but no one acknowledges it. The whole town knew about Lena's boyfriend and his adulterous behavior, but no one bothered to tell her. Music allows these characters to break their isolation and overcome these experiences. In one example, Gabriella's empowering solo in which she finally proclaims "my life is only mine," gives her the courage to finally leave her husband.

The villagers aren't the only ones who learn how to open up and love themselves–Daniel is affected as well. He begins to take down his self-imposed walls of isolation with the help of Lena. Their relationship is sweet and fairly innocent (though the fact that Daniel was considerably older than Lena was somewhat off putting). Lena aids Daniel in regaining the simple joys of childhood, such as riding a bike ("You're the one always talking about balance!" she teases). "Welcome home," she tells him, when he tearfully reveals that he was raised in the village.

The spiritual aspects of As it is in Heaven are not as prominent as the title may lead a viewer to believe. Early on, we listen in on a church service very focused on sin and flawed human nature, but it's a long time before anything overtly Christian is mentioned again. The most interesting insights into spirituality come from the women in the film. The empowering experiences in the choir cause Inger to reveal the secret belief she has harbored for 20 years: sin is an invention of the church that only exists in your head. "God doesn't forgive, don't you get that?" Inger says to her husband, the pastor, "Because He's never condemned." This confession rocks their already unstable marriage, and ultimately causes Inger to leave. The revelation seems somewhat out of place, mostly due to the lack of religion overall in the rest of the film. Its controversial implications are never brought up again outside the scene. There are some obvious (perhaps too obvious) Christian metaphors in the movie–the cross falls when Siv slams the door on the "sinful" choir, and the women tending to Daniel and wrapping him in white cloth after Conny beats him is reminiscent of the women tending to Jesus after the crucifixion.

Lena's contribution to the film's spirituality is more typical of her character's behavior. Lena is often portrayed as an angel throughout the film, bringing a vibrant joy to all her interactions. It makes sense when, near the end of the film, she asks Daniel, "Do you believe in angels? If I squint, sometimes I see their wings." Lena helps Daniel see the good in everyone, and instinctively reassures him about his fears of death. "There is no death," she tells him. And she's right. Though the film ends with Daniel's physical death (a predictable and somewhat melodramatic note, compared to the compelling realism present in the rest of the film), he lives on through the music he has created and the community he has built around it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A symphony of love
alternativ-byn7 February 2006
I am not going to spoil the contents to anyone, who has not yet watched this humble masterpiece by Kay Pollak.

A world famous conductor brilliantly played by Michael Nyqvist seeks peace from stress by moving back to his childhood village. The villagers, who has followed the genius in silence, are slowly tempting him to share of his greatness.

Each role in this movie, has a very specific purpose and shows a remarkable potential in each of the actors playing their own chord in short but precise words, a symphony of love.

Not love in the sense of relationship, but in the tone of the spirit deeply buried within each of the characters, each revealing their own present story, their needs, their skeletons, desires and much more.

I shall not forget to mention, the two main parts played by Frida Hallgren and Michael Nyqvist, whose dramas are played in unforgettable harmonies of emotional feedback. They touch each other with a pain connected in their own disability to love themselves.

Michael Nyqvist is really put to the test here in a very difficult setup, in one of those movies that either end up as catastrophic or fantastic. And fantastic it became from start to end, not one second less or more than enough, you are left with a feeling of change and a taste for more.

To this day, definitely one of the best movies I have had the pleasure of watching.
39 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ambivalent story
Enchorde12 December 2004
Warning: Spoilers
** HERE BE SPOILERS **

Daniel Dareus (Nyqvist) a world famous conductor has a small heart attack and needs to slow down his fast paced life. He decides to return to the small village were he lived as a kid. His last name is changed so nobody recognizes him. He has decided to return to listen but decide to take the position as cantor and lead the small church choir. Maybe here he can fulfill his dream to create music that will open hearts. However, nothing is as easy as it seems. Each member in the choir is kind of a special character with a complicated situation and relationships around them. Some has a somewhat bad reputation and someone has a drunken violent husband. And in the small village everybody knows everything about each other, which further complicates matter. With his music Daniel slowly brings the choir together and emotions start to spark in the village. Pride and jealousy, but also joy and love, and all involve Daniel in some way. So, as he sort his own life out he must navigate through the conflicts around him, and maybe create music.

A little odd story with a lot of interesting characters that is kind of (stereo-)typical of a small village in Norrland (North of Sweden). The actors are all very good, especially Nyqvist and Hallgren (as Lena) in the main characters. Jähkel, Morberg and Sjöberg also portray interesting characters very good and Sjöholm is an experience to see and especially listen to. But unfortunately the story is somewhat ambivalent, it seems that it cannot make up its mind. On one level, it seems to want to be a portrait of life in a small village, one another it seems to want to be very dramatic with intense situations. Brought together it actually seems like the story itself overacts a bit. That is unfortunate and brings the viewing experience down several notches. Otherwise it is better than expected, there are some genuinely funny moments (extremely rare in Swedish drama in my opinion) and there are some interesting comments about everyday life. And the music is very beautiful and well used. Then there is the end, that doesn't work at all. It has such a strong resemblance to another (very well known) movie that makes it just seem cheap.

5/10
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
no extras all pure enjoyment
ImDb-917413 February 2006
Back to the roots with "like it is in heaven" - what are the real values of life? These Swedes carve out a message that appeals to every heart. We've seen it twice now in a cinema packed to the last seat: love pure and joy within the music of a choir that's simple, yet full of power once everyone finds his or her inner tone.

From the glitter of fame to the school of of his youth, now empty and ready to be adapted as his new home after collapsing on stage, Daniel wants to start listening and is drawn into the lives of the simple, warm and rough people of the North.

He wins the hearts with music and gains the capacity to love and be loved unconditionally.

Don't go see it if you've been normed to Hollywood. This stuff contains no extras, just your laughter, your compassion, your tears!
33 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I'd recommend "The Chorus" instead....
planktonrules29 August 2017
In 2005, "As It Is In Heaven" was nominated for the Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film...and ironically, so was the French film "The Chorus". I say there's irony because their plots are extremely similar. Both involve a man trying to lead a chorus to greatness and both, ultimately, had to deal with fun-hating authoritarians who wanted to disrupt their work. But, of the two, "The Chorus" is a much better picture because it was written better and the ending made more sense and doesn't leave you angry.

Daniel Daréus (Michael Nyqvist) is a world famous director but he also has two problems--he tends to get very angry and he has a bad heart. After suffering a heart attack while working, he's told he must quit or he'll die. So he moved back to a small, rural town in Sweden...one which he grew up in but hated as a child. He and his mother hated it so much, they left it when he was 7. Why he would choose to return here of all places to retire really didn't make a lot of sense.

Despite not being an especially friendly or happy man, he somehow is wrangled into attending a session with the local church choir as one of the members would like his opinion about their progress. Soon, however, he finds that they want him to direct this chorus and slowly his grouchy veneer vanishes and he finds a sense of purpose here. He also finds that he has grown to like the folks.

Unfortunately, there is a VERY stereotypical minister who hates fun and is too much of a caricature to be taken seriously. Plus, having a self-righteous, one-dimensional minister attacking something if it was, perhaps rock music or drugs might make some sense...but a choir?!

There also is a serious problem with the ending of the film. Some may like it...most will feel robbed. After all, you invest all this time and energy into a film and then...this?!

So what you have are some good singing, some interesting characters and a kernel of a good story...but you have all that and so much more in "The Chorus". I say what the French film.

By the way, no one seemed to care but about a decade later, the director made a sequel to this film, "Heaven on Earth". The rating on IMDb is very low and apparently it turned out to be a sequel no one particularly wanted.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Anything but Heavenly
Cinemucho22 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It is almost impossible to believe that Kay Pollack's As It Is in Heaven was made only ten years ago in 2004 for it feels dreadfully more dated than that. This Academy Award nominated film, which is essentially the Swedish version of a Lifetime Original Movie with a domestic violence plot line to boot, follows renowned conductor Daniel Daréus (Michael Nyqvist) as he returns to his childhood home in the north of Sweden after suffering a heart attack in the middle of one of his concerts. As a kid, Daniel was ruthlessly beaten and bullied by his peers, but he escaped this harsh childhood with the dream of making music that would connect with people. Upon his return home, Daniel becomes the cantor for the local church choir and starts to bring the townspeople together though what he sees as the spiritual quality of music. Complications arise when Daniel confronts a jealous church pastor, an abusive husband, and various choir members who doubt the sincerity of Daniel's project. Unfortunately, the only remarkable thing about Heaven is how painfully generic it is.

Everything in this film is simple and dull, as if the story arcs, characterization, dialogue, and music were all clumsily smashed into creation by a blindfolded kid with an unwieldy sledgehammer rather than by a skilled artist with a deft touch. The problem begins with a weak script that relies entirely on meager clichés. For example, our hero, Daniel, is the stereotypical passionate artist, but he's severely lacking in depth. All we know is that he loves music, falls in love with a girl, and then dies, both randomly and predictably. His foil, the uptight Pastor Stig (Niklas Falk), is disturbed by Daniel's free-flowing ways and surpasses Daniel only in one-dimensionality. In a particularly ridiculous scene, Stig gets into an argument with his wife, Inger (Ingella Olsson), over his conservative ideas about sexuality. Stig slut- shames his wife, explodes and has passionate sex with her, and then denounces the whole incident the next morning. This tired portrait of the repressed and hypocritical clergyman does nothing for the film, nor adds any interesting conflict or complexity.

Beyond the disappointingly shallow characterizations, Heaven makes a misstep with the plot's desperate grabs for sentimentality. There is, of course, the domestic violence plot line with the overdone, over-the-top abusive husband that makes a mere caricature of this real and important social problem. The issue is not that people like the outrageous abuser Conny (Per Morberg) do not exist in real life, but that he and his wife, Gabriella (Helen Sjöholm), are written in such a hollow way so as to make it seem like the professionals behind Heaven have never actually encountered a real human being who has been involved the cycle of abuse. In the end, Heaven exhibits a detached artificiality that undermines the film's attempt to say something meaningful about the tragedy of abusive relationships and about the empowering triumph for those who survive them. Then there's Tore (André Sjöberg), the young man who is at first shunned and underestimated by members of the choir for his intellectual disability and then ultimately accepted. Despite the fact that the film obviously casts Tore in a positive light, it is nothing more than cheap idealization. Heaven doesn't demonstrate respect Tore as person or a character, but instead uses him as bait for warm fuzzies and reduces him to the object of a patronizing smile.

The film's dialogue also betrays some serious flaws. Heaven takes little advantage of the filmic medium, and the characters often end up explaining their motivations and feelings outright rather than illustrating them through distinctive behavior, well-written characterization, and revealing cinematic techniques. For instance, when Stig shuts down the choir, he yells at Daniel unnecessarily, "I'm taking the choir away from you!" Later when Inger criticizes Stig's vendetta against Daniel, she shouts, "You're not angry at him, but at what he evokes in you!" Of course, the English subtitles may not capture the exact essence of the original Swedish, but the fact remains that a truly solid script would be able to communicate its themes without any of these clunky verbal explanations.

Some movies are disappointing in their failure to live up to their full potential, but As It Is in Heaven is not one of them. Wobbly from the start, Heaven is terrible in a boring kind of way. Perhaps time is partly to blame for how stale the movie feels, and it is possible that in its day, Heaven had some aura of charm and novelty. However, in 2014, it's difficult to see through the haze of bathetic storytelling and overdone conventions.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very well done, exceptionally moving
jsmorton5 June 2005
If the screenwriter and director intended to open hearts with the movie as the musician wanted to do with his music, they succeeded with me. Commonplace human situations became original, personal and immediate so that I personally felt touched by each situation. I believe I would credit the power of music combined with the point of view of the person writing the movie. Without spoiling, I can say that I was very moved by the movie's approach to living. Haven't actually cried out of-what- joy? empathy? just deep emotion? in a very long time. I would love to find a way to show it to others. Saw it at Seattle International Film Festival.
36 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not paradise, but heavenly singing
Philby-37 February 2007
The line, of course, is from the Lord's Prayer - "Thy Will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven". Sweden, especially its far north, is not my idea of heaven -30 degree C winter temperatures are a little on the low side for me, but the good folk who live there no doubt think they are in God's own country.

The storyline here is a familiar one. Acclaimed international musician Daniel suffers health breakdown in mid-career, goes back to the little village in northern Sweden where he was born. Persuaded by the local pastor to help out with the church choir, he turns some unlikely talent into a class act, and they enter a contest held in Innsbruck Austria. There are echoes (sorry) of the band players of "Brassed Off" the models of "Calendar Girls" and the dancers of "the Full Monty". But of course he causes plenty of emotional upheaval as some of the more downtrodden villagers realise their worth and revolt against their oppressors. He faces hostile husbands and an increasingly dubious pastor, but nothing except death is going to stop him.

Despite the somewhat corny story, we get to know and like many of the characters, who come across as people rather than caricatures despite many of them being recognisable "types'. I did wonder about the wife-beater being unpunished for so long – Sweden is one country in the world where such violence is pretty strongly discouraged (he was also a bit young to be one of the bullies of Daniel's youth) and the puritanical pastor with a secret passion for girlie magazines was a bit of a stereotype, but marvellously realised by Niklas Falk.

Michael Nyqvist is simply wonderful as Daniel, the frail but driven musician, and there's some nice music as well. I was rapt for the whole two hours. The ending is what you make of it, I guess, but it's not spoiling it to say Daniel achieves what he set out to do.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pay attention, please
sannichi6 November 2004
A very strong, sentimental, epic, Swedish film I really recommend everyone to see, as long as - and this is vital - you reflect upon what it is you're being fed. A massive amount of prefab truths are pushed at you and they are more or less finely hidden in golden wrapping, ie the music, tear jerking dialogs and circumstances, not to mention in themselves powerful medias such as disability, mobbing, abuse of women and godless religious abuse.

I'm a rather sensitive person and is easily affected by the tricks even though I realize them as blunt. One shouldn't declare others' true emotions invalid, and there are films with much worse content morally out there. The big problem lies not within the acting, directing or general aesthetics, but within the main murmur within the audience during the screening: "this is what I've always thought" and such.

Pay attention, please. Beware that nowhere in this mess is there a human being, only characters. The abuser, the hero, the mobster, the victim, the silenced, the depraved, the Samaritan and so on. My experience of reality looks very different. Is this "what you've always thought" about people? That they're dividable in categories?

And the ending is somewhat beautiful but never in human history has something like it occurred and nowhere will it, unless a strong force of mass psychology is added. "I couldn't have said it better myself". Yes you could.

Dangerous stuff, indeed.
29 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
and in Oz too.
ptb-818 February 2007
AS IT IS IN HEAVEN has been launched in Sydney Australia and has hit a major chord with Australian audiences.... and we don't speak or sing Swedish at all... nor could we be further away from icy Sweden. Apparently it has been playing for 6 months in some New Zealand cinemas... a success likely to be repeated in Australia too......It is currently in its 67th week (Feb 2008) week in Sydney alone, and with no signs of stopping. As a music drama HEAVEN has everything .... and in some places is fearless to tackle seriously adult topics one might not expect in a film about a village church choir. Glorious music, very funny interaction between village choir members and some startling drama allow this film to offer a genuine smörgåsbord of cinematic scenes that, in total, actually work very well. If all this is not enough, the third act sees the choir off to Austria, Sound Of Music, style to compete in a major contest... but at least instead of Eidelweiss we get the breathtaking 'Frida's Song' which will melt any icy heart. Almost too much in places, it becomes a very rewarding film to relish. MR HOLLANDS OPUS might be a near US counterpart.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Divinity of existence
jon_a_au23 May 2005
A beautiful film, touching profoundly up the simple, yet divine aspects of humanity.

This movie was almost perfect, and seeing as nothing in this world can be truly perfect, that is pretty good. The only minor thing I subjectively object to, is the pacing at some points in the middle of the story. The acting is also very good, and all the actors easily top actors in high-profile films. The actual directing seems to have been well thought through, and the script must have been amazing. There are some truly breathtaking moments of foreshadowing, and a quite gorgeous continuing circular composition of the story.

The moment in the movie, when the main character achieves that feeling of being in heaven is the perfect ending to a truly brilliant yarn.
24 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
how come?
negele19 July 2005
if this movie is really as crappy as most of the other guys rated it, how come close to 700 people gave it an 7.3 out of 10? i actually saw it last week and thoroughly enjoyed it as something nicely different from mainstream cinema. OK, so it was slow and OK, so the people seemed a bit naive, but, hey, we're talking about inhabitants of a really small rural community. talk to people living in rural oklahoma, i think they'd be different from your average new yorker as well. movie fans enjoying slow stories will like this one, especially those who know michael nykvist from his former roles in "Tillsammans" and "Grabben i graven bredvid". i did.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Touching and Sensitive – A Very Beautiful Movie
claudio_carvalho1 June 2008
The famous international conductor Daniel Daréus (Michael Nyqvist) has a heart attack with his stressed busy professional life and interrupts his successful career with an early retirement. He decides to return to his hometown in the north of Sweden, from where his mother left when he was a seven year-old sensitive boy bullied by Conny and other school mates, to live a low-paced life. He buys an old school and is invited to participate in the church choir by the local Shepherd Stig (Niklas Falk), but the reluctant and shy Daniel refuses in the principle. However, he gets involved with the community and feels attracted by Lena (Frida Hallgren), a local woman with a past with the local doctor. His music opens the hearts of the members of the choir, affecting their daily life: the slow Tore (André Sjöberg) has the chance to participate in the choir; Inger (Ingela Olsson), the wife of Stig, releases her repressed sexuality; Gabriella (Helen Sjöholm) takes an attitude against her abusive and violent husband; the gossiper and frustrated Siv (Ilva Lööf) opens her heart against Lena; the fat Holmfrid (Mikael Rahm) cries enough against the jokes of the businessman Arne (Lennart Jähkel); even Daniel starts loving people and Lena as the love of his life. When they are invited to participate in an important contest in Vienna, Daniel finds his music opening the heart of people making his dream come true.

"Så Som I Himmelen" is a touching and sensitive movie, with a very beautiful story. It is impressive how director Kay Pollak and the screenplay writers have been able to develop a great number of characters in 132 minutes running time. The performances are top-notch, supported by magnificent music score and at least two awesome moments: when Gabrielle sings her song in the concert, and certainly the last concert in Vienna with the audience, jury and everybody participating in the melody, and Daniel making his dream come true. Like in "Teorema", the stranger changes the lives, not of only a family, but of a conservative community. Further, like many European movies, the open conclusion indicates that Daniel actually died, at least in my interpretation, reaching peace with the success of his music. My eyes became wet in these two scenes. My vote is nine.

Title (Brazil): "A Vida no Paraíso" ("The Life In the Paradise")
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Musician comes home to bring out the best and confront the worst in his village.
thebucketrider26 May 2006
The film begins with a boy practicing violin in a field until he is interrupted violently by a group of bullies. The boy leaves the town, grows up to become a famous conductor but comes back when his failing health forces him to take a break. Then he accepts a position directing the choir, a job that pits him against one of the bullies from his childhood (who has aged far more gracefully) and an insecure, puritanical pastor. The cartoonish pastor serves as a straw man for the film to mount a facile attack on church morality. This, in my view, was the weakest point of the movie. However, the interaction of the provincial singers with the conductor and among each other is often genuine and touching. To my mind, the ending, with things taken an unpredictable and gratuitous turn, smacks a bit of Hollywood feel good overstatement. But in a less critical mood, I think it could be very uplifting. It is worth noting that it is a variation on the experience Daniel describes early in the movie of conducting or, rather, not conducting his orchestra during a blackout.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A true feel-good film
Ting_1317 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
My expectations were quite high for this film. Everyone I know who saw this film at the cinema told me that everyone there stayed through the credits because they were so touched. My expectations could not have been any higher, anything short of wonderful would have disappointed me.

I was anything but disappointed by this movie. I loved how it dealt with difficult subjects without going through the usual steps a Hollywood film tends to include. In this film characters worked through problems they had had for decades, they worked through prejudicm, they learned to open up. But it did not come easily, and not just by singing a song or two. It was painful, it took arguments, it took confrontations. It felt like real life.

One scene that really stuck out to me was the scene in which Gabriella sings her song. Helen Sjöholm is one of my favorite singers, her voice is lovely, and you could tell that she was not just lip-syncing to a previous recording during filming (which I often find in other movies), she really sang with her whole body and soul. You could feel what Gabriella was feeling in that scene. Had this movie been made in Hollywood her song would most likely have been sung toward the end, and it would have made her husband open his eyes and see the error of his ways, as well as making the other people in the village realise a thing or two. Instead it came halfway through, and it did not bring any solutions. Her husband did not become overwhelmed and realise what he's putting her through, and it didn't seem to make anyone else in the village more open minded. It was beautiful, it was pure and it was touching but it did not magically solve all her problems. That felt real to me, that's probably what would have happened in real life. The whole movie felt like real life to me, nothing neatly wrapped up but everything with a sense of joy and happiness. You rarely find a movie which feels so realistic.

There were a few things that bothered me, but hey, no movie is perfect. If you haven't already you should go see "As it is in Heaven" and be filled with a joy for life, a sense of hope and the feeling that you've been touched on a level movies rarely reach. You will be sad, pained, happy and a dozen other emotions.

Someone once said that if every person in the world sang in a choir there would be no more wars. Having seen this film I might have to agree.
20 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Poorly written, huge gaps in plot
Anteater_Bill7 April 2012
While this film provides a mildly interesting view of life in northern Sweden, there are plot holes you could drive a truck through. In particular, character motivation is incomprehensible. Why does this world famous musician retire to his childhood home which he hated? This is never really explained, and it is an important point. He could go anywhere in the world he chooses, so why go to this cold Swedish hell? Not explained. Why does he agree to direct a choir when all he wants to do is "listen?" Again, no convincing explanation. What the heck is physically wrong with him? We are told "heart problems" yet we see him smeared with blood on several occasions (looks more like TB than heart problems) and there appears to be no attempt at medical treatment or self-care. He seems to have no idea of his own physical limitations or to take the most basic steps towards remaining alive. So is he suicidal or what? Again, there is a large plot element focused on domestic violence, but the police are not called in until very late, and there is no real reason why not. Etc. etc. The film makes some lame attempt to answer these and other questions, but the result is unconvincing and unsatisfying. Thumbs down, an insult to viewers' intelligence.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
So Much Happy
laurahein1122 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Kay Pollack's sometimes annoyingly uplifting moralistic film, "As It Is in Heaven", shows the story of a man returning to his hometown marked by his own sad memories of his childhood. Daniel Darius, played by Michael Nyqvist, is an extremely successful and gifted conductor, composer, and musician but is forced to question his career after a serious health scare. Daniel moves back to his hometown and is coerced into listening to a local choir, despite his protests. He eventually concedes to directing and teaching the choir once he discovers an interest in one of the choir members.

The influence of religion is heavy and rather obvious in this film. The choir is a church choir that sings religious songs, both in Swedish and English. There are moralistic themes in the storyline such as: believing in oneself, finding ones voice, going on despite the odds, etc. The fact that the main character, Daniel Darius, is shown to have risen from oppression into excellence and to have overcome odds propels him to some sort of Christ figure. If Pollack had intended to make any subtle comparisons or similarities to religion, he failed miserably. In a bit of an interesting contrast, Pollack also highlights violence, specifically violence perpetuated by men who are supposed leaders of their church or family. Conny, played by Per Morberg, is Daniel's childhood bully who has stayed in their hometown and married a woman whom he controls in almost every aspect beats his wife and Daniel when he is displeased. Also, the pastor, Stig played by Niklas Falk, turns to violent actions against his wife Inger, played by Ingela Olsson when she displays questionable actions in his view. It is difficult to understand why Pollack included this violence alongside the more moralistic and holy religious themes especially given the fact that the pastor is involved in this violence. So it almost seems as if Pollack is supporting spirituality and religion but not the hierarchical nature and old rules of the church.

Stemming from this strange side by side comparison of religion and violence, the idea of hypocrisy is shown through the entire film. Going back to Stig, the pastor, it is revealed to the viewer that he hides pornographic magazines in his house for his own sexual pleasure, and his wife knows of this but doesn't acknowledge it until a key point in their relationship. So while he claims to be this holy man, he is just as weak to sexual pleasures as any regular person, and instead of acknowledging this, he chooses to hide it and make himself a hypocrite. Towards the beginning of the film, it is shown how Daniel lives and breathes his music, which is the love of his life. Once he moves to his hometown, he initially refuses to help a choir who only wants to live and breathe their own music. It seems that Daniel understood what a hypocritical stance this was and decided to help the choir (it also helped that a beautiful woman was a member in the choir, but I'd rather give Daniel a bit more credit than that).

Now as to why I am only giving this film a five out of ten. I do not enjoy films that hit a viewer over the head with the intended theme or moral of the story. This is purely personal preference when it comes down to it, but I'd rather have a very open film that has many interpretations than a very closed one with a very intended result. It may be more approachable to more viewers because of how easy the meaning of the story is to grasp, but I'd like to think that I am not a normal, ignorant film-goer. This just wasn't a sophisticated plot that made me think. Nonetheless, Michael Nyqvist did a wonderful acting as Daniel Darius and his wide range of emotions, but even a good actor cannot save a movie like this one.

"As It Is in Heaven" most definitely had an agenda in its storyline, not that that is generally a bad thing, but how Pollack went about doing it made it too redundant for my taste. Although there were some interesting contrasts between religion, violence and hypocrisy, it did not feel as though those contrasts were as developed as they could be to make this film more thought provoking and profound. The film was most definitely intended to be uplifting and "warm fuzzy"-inducing, but rather I felt more annoyed than anything after the film ended.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed