Bee Season (2005) Poster

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
81 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
An attempt to be mystical that just doesn't work
Groovey30 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Several other reviewers have commented on the fractured nature of this film. It appears to be a Kabbalistic approach to healing shattered reality, put together as a parable.

I know very little about Kabbalism, so that may be why so many pieces were nonsensical to me. Some things, however, were clear on reflection. Eliza's choice at the end was a redemptive sacrifice. It was a way of turning Saul's obsession back upon itself, so he, when he was brought up short by the apparent disaster, would be accessible once again to his family. The final implications are that she is successful in this, and happy with her choice. Eliza also connects with her mother through the camera, and apparently starts her back on the road to healing.

There are some very nice uses of glass and kaleidoscope imagery as metaphors of shattered personality and lives, particularly for the mother, but for all the characters to some extent.

All of that makes sense, but as a whole, it just doesn't work. The mother has apparently been in a psychotic break for many years, and no one noticed? The son, who seems to have a close relationship with both his father and his sister, responds to the father's extra time with Eliza for the bee with petulant jealousy, and finally runs off to join the Hari Krishnas, without any indication of why he is searching or why the traditions of his family do not work for him. His motivation seems to be nothing more than an exceedingly pretty face.

The daughter, Eliza, is the hardest one to believe of all -- even though she is masterfully represented. In an unusual form of Deus Ex Machina, she restores the shattered family by having paranormal abilities, and then denying those abilities as a sacrifice to redeem the ones she loves. (I suspect this is part of Kabbalistic mysticism, but I don't know.) In one spoken letter, she brings sanity back to her shattered family, reeling in all the fragmented pieces, just as her father had described, and her mother had tried and failed to do. It's a nice idea for a parable, but I found the final answer too pat, the mystical portions glossing over frightful danger, and the pain of the family both believably intense yet unbelievably represented, and I could not believe the solution.

Maybe it is because my own spiritual views are vastly different from the writers, but it was painful to watch, and neither satisfying nor helpful.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fails to explore the depth of its character
howard.schumann17 April 2006
In Bee Season, a film by Scott McGehee and David Siegel, a suburban Oakland family discovers meaning and purpose in the Kabbalistic concept of tikkun olam, translated as repairing the world. Adapted by Naomi Foner Gyllenhaal (Running on Empty) from the novel by Myla Goldberg, the film explores the subject of Jewish mysticism and its effect on a dysfunctional family. Relying on the teachings of Isaac Luria, a 16th century Jewish Kabbalist, Berkeley Professor Saul Naumann (Richard Gere) instructs his students that God created the world by forming vessels of light but, as He poured the light into the vessels, they shattered and became countless shards. Thus, humanity's task is to free and reunite the scattered Light and restore the broken world. Naumann is an intellectual who reaches out to God but cannot connect with his family and they mirror the broken shards rather than the Divine Light.

Saul is close to his musically gifted son Aaron (Max Minghella) with whom he shares a love of music but ignores his 11-year old daughter Eliza (Flora Cross) until her talent for spelling is recognized and she wins local and regional spelling bees. He takes advantage of the opportunity to become closer to her by training her for the national championship and encouraging her to explore the mystical states that he only relates to conceptually. He sees in Eliza the potential to put into practice the teachings of the Kabbalah scholar Abulafia that enlightenment can be achieved through alignment of letters and words. He tells her that "many cultures believe that letters are an expression of a special, powerful energy; that when they combine to make words, they hold all the secrets of the universe." Yet as Eliza and her father delve further into their studies, they forget to look around and see that the people around them are in trouble.

Aaron rejects his father's teachings and turns to Hinduism at the encouragement of a young woman named Chali (Kate Bosworth). He pretends to go on a weekend camping trip but instead dons orange robes and spends the time at a retreat for Hare Krishna followers, much to his father's displeasure. Unfortunately, the story treats his decision to explore a different faith as an adolescent lark rather than a legitimate spiritual quest and we never discover his true reasons for his interest. Meanwhile, Saul's wife Miriam (Juliette Binoche) has flashbacks of a car accident that killed her parents. She takes the phrase Tikkun Olam – "to repair the world" - literally and steals small glittering objects from people's homes in order to reconstruct the world but her own world begins to spiral downward. The sub-plots are not well developed however, and the characters' behavior is insufficiently motivated to be plausible.

The heart of the film lies in the transformation that is taking place within Eliza, dramatized in the spelling bee competitions. Although she has never seen or heard of a particular word before, she is able to visualize it in different ways by concentrating with her eyes closed, depicted on screen by clever special effects. We follow the gifted speller as she moves through one competition after another and marvel at how she is able to remain centered while the world around her is crumbling. The acting is credible and Cross is a promising newcomer but Gere emotes too much personal warmth and "star quality" to be fully convincing as a self-centered, emotionally detached Jewish scholar.

Bee Season has a potent message in so far as it celebrates an individual's use of personal power to alter their experience of reality. The filmmakers, however, fail to clarify what the film is trying to say. Various threads compete for attention: Eliza's personal experiences of God, Saul's Kabbalistic teachings, Aaron's turn to Eastern religion, and Miriam's sickness, but none are sufficiently developed to make a coherent statement. Even the ending that is supposed to bring some resolution leaves us scratching our heads. Bee Season is a well-intentioned film that tackles an important subject but ultimately fails to fully explore the depth of its characters or the true meaning of its message, and I found its suggestion that a family can love God but not each other to be incongruous.
59 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Indolent look at a kaleidoscope of themes.
rmax30482316 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Well, just about every kind of quirk you might expect to find in a nice Jewish academic family in Berkeley is tucked away somewhere in this leisurely trip through misunderstandings.

Richard Gere, gone white and looking great, does most of the talking and most of the moving. He teaches Hebrew Studies, he coaches his son on the cello, he always cooks dinner at home. (Pretty liberated, eh?) Now Gere isn't frenetic as he sometimes has been, as in, say, "Power". His buzzing activity mostly stands out because nobody else has much of it.

His wife, Juliette Binoche, has lost her family and wanders around with all the substance of a wisp of smoke. It turns out she's covering up some quirky activities, even for a family like this. She has a garage full of broken trinkets she's collected from other people's properties. They hang from the ceiling in a multitude of sparkling threads, tinkling a little bit, as Gere discovers them and goggles at the sight.

Then there's the son, Aaron. Gere is a devoutly religious man who would like to be a mystic but is reduced to merely studying Jewish mysticism. But the son? Well, he's a whiz on the cello. With a father like Gere you could hardly be other than a whiz at whatever he urged you to try. And Aaron is searching for God too. But where does he find God? In the now-defunct Hare Krishnas. Of course it could have been worse. Aaron might have dug up some suicide cult. But still, for some people it must be getting a bit tiresome to deal with people who have learned that God is communicating with them. Andy Warhol once claimed that he'd been given a dead phone but that God was supposed to be on the other end waiting for his call. Warhol never made the call because he could never think of anything to say. Doctor Fielgut's advice is this: Do find God, if you can, but then whatever he tells you keep it to yourself.

Oh, yes. Then there's the little daughter, reserved, soft, vulnerable, unamazing in any way until she discovers that she has some form of synesthesia regarding words. When she hears "cotyledon" defined, she closes her eyes and is swirled about with leaves. When Gere finds this out -- WOW! TWO geniuses in the family, not including him and Juliette Binoche who is "a scientist." Aaron and his cello are put on the back burner while Gere hovers over his daughter and tells her emphatically that God is in the letters. In the end she teaches him a valuable lesson too, humility.

There's something distasteful about judged performances like spelling bees though. I say this not only because Barbara Lukashinsky came in first, to my second, in a fifth-grade spelling bee, just because I misspelled a stupid word like "nickel" and she got it right. No, it's not that at all, even though she didn't deserve first prize.

It's that like other judged performances, spelling bees are a zero-sum game. One can only "win" at the expense of someone else. It's competition in its purest form. You win the prize by beating everyone else. But who wins a prize for cooperation? Or self sacrifice? Roger Bannister was the first person to run a 4-minute mile. Does anyone remember who was the second runner to break four minutes? It isn't that competition is necessarily bad per se. It can boost team solidarity and even be fun. The main problem with spelling bees is that they encourage lazy, categorical thinking about either "victory" or "defeat", while "compromise" has no part in the contest.

This is a pretty slow movie. It's almost European. It's stuffed with far too many themes, like the kaleidoscope (did I spell that right?) that Binoche hands down to daughter Emily. Impossible to grasp them all. But it's a nice change to see a film that challenges us.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I Wish More Had Been "Spelled Out" For The Audience
JeromeFreeman7 November 2005
Since I have not read the novel upon which Bee Season is based, I cannot evaluate the film's interpretation of the book. It seems, however, that there is more occurring within the characters of this story that is not stated or developed within the screenplay. And unfortunately more needed to be conveyed, and developed in order for this film to affect the audience in a useful way. Plot Summary: The film is about an intellectual, dynamic family. Eliza (Flora Cross) enters a school spelling bee, wins, and soon realizes she has the ability to visualize words and their correct spelling. She says she feels and sees the word "talking to her." Her father, Saul Naumann (Richard Gere), a professor of Judaic Mysticism at a San Francisco university later decides that Eliza has the unique ability to speak to God. He becomes preoccupied with nurturing and developing this "gift" within his daughter, and in the process falls out of touch with his son Aaron (Max Minghella), who becomes disillusioned with his faith in Judaism and rebels against the influences of his father. Aaron begins studying Buddhism after meeting a female romantic interest who is sympathetic to his expressed feelings of emptiness and detachment. Saul's Wife, Miriam (Juliette Binoche), struggles with her own detachment from reality as she continues to mourn the death of her parents who died in an accident when she was young girl. My Analysis: Like some of the characters in the film, I too left the film somewhat empty, or unfulfilled. I wanted to know more about what was going on with this family. The relationship between Gere's character and his son is somewhat familiar -- a son rebels against a father who is too strongly pushing his faith and interests. This form of rebellion seems typical of most adolescents. The mother and daughter share the unusual relationship; both of whom seem to possess certain supernatural powers. While it is the daughter's power to visualize and spell that is the focal point of the film, it may well be a similar ability that drives her mother to mental illness. The relationship between them should have been developed more, however. I wanted to know what the mystical-supernatural ability meant, but the screenplay doesn't explain much, and this is frustrating. In addition, when it becomes apparent that Miriam is suffering from a severe mental disorder and continues to mourn the death of her parents, I questioned why her husband was so utterly unaware of her suffering as it had been going on for some time. He was an intelligent man who had great concern for the welfare of his family, and it didn't seem to fit his character. The film might merely be about a domineering father and the influence his beliefs have over his family. But I'm hoping it's more than that. The story goes to pains to make it clear that there is a very real supernatural element at work here, but the film doesn't do enough to convey what this means and why it's important. I appreciate movies that are efficient, that don't hold my hand through everything and that give me credit for making inferences to tie a storyline together, or even leave the story purposely ambiguous so as to allow for interpretation, but in the case of the Bee Season, the subject matter is too abstruse and the story is too underdeveloped. I could not reach a satisfactory understanding of what occurred and why it was important. The acting was strong, however. Binoche, Gere and company make the best of an underdeveloped script. The quality of the acting makes the problems with the script even more frustrating because it seems like this film could have been much more.
95 out of 121 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No Chemistry Btw Characters
leesa8424 May 2006
Perhaps I wasn't in a particularly patient mood when I rented this flick, however I just couldn't finish it after an hour. The actors had no chemistry whatsoever. I adore Juliette Binoche, but there was no tension/attraction/emotion between her and her supposed husband played by Richard Gere. Richard Gere did not suit the role of a Jewish, brooding intellectual. Flora Cross was interesting and quirky, but again her relationship with other characters seemed forced. (I must say that I am a large fan of the chin cleft, it's a wonderful thing...). The entire book was dumbed down, the magic was rendered laughable. I suggest you spare yourself the experience.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
E-l-i-z-a
jotix10020 November 2005
If there is a novel that doesn't lend itself for cinematic adaptation, "Bee Season", written by Myla Goldberg, would seem to be the one. It doesn't help that the screen play, as written by the talented Naomi Foner Gyllenhaal, doesn't help to clarify for the casual viewer what is going on with the Naumanns of Oakland. In fact, the problem in the novel, as well as with the movie is Miriam, the distant mother who has fled reality and lives in a world of her own.

"Bee Season" co-directed by Scott McGehee and David Siegel feels empty because the somber treatment they have given to the movie. The dark cinematography of Giles Nuttgens doesn't help either, but the musical scores of Peter Nasher works well, as a whole.

One enters the Naumann world through the sensitive Eliza, a girl much older and wiser than her 11 years indicate. It is Eliza who senses all that is wrong with her family, as it appears they are falling apart in front of her, and as a little girl, she simply can't do anything at all to bring everyone together. As a way to escape the unhappy home, Eliza immerses herself in the spelling bee contests in which she excels. Not until then, does she get the attention of her father, who supports her newly found talent.

Saul, the religious studies professor, doesn't even come aware about what's wrong with his marriage until it's too late. In fact, he is a man appears to be unable to communicate with the illusive Miriam, a woman who is deeply disturbed by what happened in her own life with the tragedy of her parents death. Saul and Miriam's marriage is over, but they don't do anything to correct the situation. Miriam's problems come to a head when she is taken away and makes Saul confront the many issues that he probably never dealt with before.

Aaron, the older son, is rebelling against his own religion. He needs to experiment with other beliefs because he is at that stage of his life in which he is trying to find out who he is. That is why when he meets Chali, the young Hare Krishna follower, he decides to follow her in his quest for finding a guidance for his life.

The ensemble playing is dominated by the youngest cast member, Flora Cross, who makes a luminous Eliza. Her expressive eyes and her intelligence tells everything about her. Juliette Binoche's Miriam is a puzzle. Richard Gere does what he can with Saul and Max Minghella has some good moments as Aaron. Kate Bosworth is seen briefly as Chali.

"Bee Season" is a difficult film to sit through because it is a dark look into a family falling apart without a safety net. Also, the way the film has been promoted gives a false impression about its content.
89 out of 114 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A preposterous script
manuelmonasterio22 April 2006
No one of the characters acquires the slightest level of credibility in this failed attempt to produce a movie with a touch of transcendence. The first philosophical comments by Richard Gere promise -at least for the connoisseur- a glimpse into the deeper side of human life that, unfortunately, never comes to get going in this insipid movie. The presence of French Juliette Binoche -a delightful actress- is insufficient to get this movie out of the hole of inconsistency and nonsense. Nothing seems real, the characters are completely undeveloped. The audience is deluded into believe that this movie is going to tell something insightful about Inner quest, mystic search and emotional alienation in close relationships. The movie seems a failed try to mix the American look with the European touch in movie making.The author, director ad crew, must keep looking to produce something meaningful of the sort. Richard Gere (as well as has happened to Kevin Costner) needs to find a way out of this dreadful trail of later. His fans -and I am one of them- are sill waiting!
26 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Austin Movie Show review -- transcendent
leilapostgrad20 November 2005
Imagine growing up in a family of academics, musicians, and Jewish mystics. When 12-year-old Eliza (Flora Cross) wins both the district and regional spelling bees, her father, Saul (Richard GereJewish mysticism, begins to tutor her daily. Not only is he preparing her for the state spelling bee competition, but Saul is also training his daughter to be the mystic he wasn't able to become. Bee Season is not only a movie about meditation, but it is also itself a meditation. This family is consumed with finding God, but they all look outside of the family to find it, and in the process, the family falls apart. Eliza's older brother Aaron (Max Minghella) is so jealous that his sister is getting all of the family's attention that he goes off and joins a Buddhist cult, and everyone in the family is so focused on their own problems that no one notices the mother (Juliette Binoche) going slowly insane! Bee Season is transcendent and thought-provoking, and it even makes me want to go out and look for God.
31 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
you knew it couldn't be a true story, warning spoiler...
gotlogos13 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
...cause people in reality would never throw a national spelling bee over such silliness. I completely forgave the movie for its sickening angst but not after such a terrible ending.

I don't care the reason for it. I watch movies to celebrate. That little girl went through all the trouble to get to a national stage and then she throws it? Give me a break. And all the family is high-fiving over it and being all weepy-woo over it? Not going to buy it.

Everyone I watched it with was disgusted.

And the dad, seemed like one of the best dad's you could ever have yet he was made out to be a meddler? What the? If he would have ignored her success then he would have been knifed for that - can't win for losing. And a major flaw is the teenage son being a big fan of dad and very well balanced in the beginning, then he suddenly becomes a caricature of teen angst, even tellign his little sister to lose cause, "Its all about him anyway". Sheesh - thats made-for-TV crapola.

What is happening with movies where there are no winners in the end? Lets get back to the simple pleasures in life, like a happy ending in a movie.

I know this is based on a book and maybe they couldn't change the ending, but at least explain yourself better than the movie did. "Thats my daughter..", the mother happily weeps in the mental hospital after she threw the game, but I had no sympathy for any of it. Maybe thats why she was in the mental hospital, for that sort of behavior.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ending falls flat
drowecaplan7 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
We were delighted with the word and resonance mysticism angle as applied to spelling and all the surrounding (Kabbalistic) aspects thereof, but couldn't understand the ending.

The family is fragmented, a literal version of the "metaphorical' shattering of created beings per the Kabbalah's version of theogonic teleology. Each family member is on a journey to reel in the broken pieces in their own way, in terms of their own resonance. The father: with intellect. The daughter: with authentic mystical absorption. The son: with incantation (parallel to his sister, but inauthentic). And finally, the mother: with art that is based on the theogony of the shattering-debacle of creation as explained to her by her husband, which is also based on the parallel aspect of her past, viz., which is that of her having lost her parents to a car wreck.

All these aspects are wonderful, they're going places, and then ... she spells 'solipsism' (interesting choice of word) correctly, and throws the final word that could win her the spelling bee. Why did she do it? The reasoning seems to be as follows: 1) by throwing the bee, she brings her father back together with his son (Gere and son are embracing in the end). 2) she somehow heals her mother's inner angst (although unclear how and why). 3) and thus she brings all the shattered pieces back together again.

By throwing the bee. I don't get it. She could've done it by winning the bee too, because Gere could've been happy as a clam, the bee season is now over, and he could devote more attention to his son AND daughter with renewed enthusiasm. The message of throwing the bee, in my opinion, was contrived and superficial, it's the hackneyed martyrdom thing. The story should've gone for the gusto and make its mysticism pay off in every magical way possible.

Now that would have been cool.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
what the heck?
spamilicious36759 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
OK so i rented Bee Season from the library and i read the back cover, it said stuff about a cute girl who was good at spelling bees and her father's determination to win. it had no mention of a crazy mother, a withdrawn son, or a spiritual side of the movie. i think it focused too much on different religions and random things.

to me, the movie basically made absolutely no sense whatsoever. first Eliza's good at spelling, she feels like her dad is ignoring her, then he's her best friend, then the mother goes crazy and steals everything, then the son starts lying and "cheating" on the family religion.

and the fact that the little girl, Eliza, enters the dangerous world and has a seizure just doesn't add up. and may i ask you a question? why does she spell the winning word wrong? does she want to make a mistake to help her mom? does she want to let all the pressure off of herself? does she want to pretend that she doesn't see her "signs"? i could go on and on with the possibilities.

basically, i thought it was so random when the mom gets urges to go into strangers' homes and steal stuff then make a shed full of stolen stuff. then she has flashbacks of a car and glasses, an intimate moment with a man, and being a kid with a kaleidescope. plus when the boy hates the family, then loves the family, goes to his own religion and all of it is just so confusing.

this family is one of the weirdest ever. they have dinner together but yet they don't communicate. the mom is missing and they don't bother to ask. the daughter is scared and they don't talk. the mom is scaring everyone and no one cares enough to ask. the boy is running off to different houses of worship and the parents don't ask where he's been.

the reason i gave this movie a 1 rating out of 10 is because it was lame, weird and confusing. the plot, if there was any, didn't make sense, jumped back and forth with different people, didn't follow the back cover at all, and was entirely a waste of time.

if you are thinking about renting or acquiring this movie, don't try to understand it. you will just hurt your brain in the process because it cant be understood. actually, do yourself a favor and rent a better movie, one that is worthwhile seeing because this one was most definitely a waste of time.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent Movie
ebender-116 May 2006
I know most people don't give this movie a very good review and that's unfortunate. It is a very deep movie and the viewer is made to think. It's not the kind of movie where everything falls into place and everything ends up happily ever after. If that is the kind of movie you like then this one is not for you. If you like a movie that is deep and has a very serious story line then this is the one.

I will try to put this in as simple terms possible; the story is mostly based around Saul Naumann, the father (Richard Gere) and his daughter Eliza (Flora Cross) both superbly acted by the way. Saul is a professor on the Jewish Religion and he very much wants to get closer to God but is unable to. Saul is a very domineering husband and father, very self-centered, so is unable to see the problems that are dividing the family, or maybe he sees it and doesn't want to admit it.

When his daughter begins to win at spelling bees he thinks that somehow Eliza is linked with God and that is how she sees the word and can spell it correctly. He begins teaching her like she was one of his students by using the thesis he wrote to become a professor. In this thesis it lays out the plan to get closer to God, he tried it for himself but couldn't, so he decides to try it on his daughter.

Saul's wife Miriam (Juliette Binoche) has many problems stemming back from the time her parents were killed in an auto accident when she was a young girl. I'm not going to go into specifics here but if you pay close attention to the scene where he is talking to his class you will understand how this is linked to Miriam's problem and how she has decided to solve it. Also pay attention to the scenes where I'm assuming they were fist married (flash backs) and he is explaining to Miriam the same thing he has been talking about with his class in that scene I mentioned. Because Saul is so domineering and self-centered he doesn't realize that she even has a problem until it all explodes and he finally becomes aware of what she is doing. Miriam tries to explain to Saul why she did what she did and if you listen closely to what she says you will understand.

The son Aaron (Max Minghella) has a good relationship with his father and is shown a lot of attention by him until Saul begins to spend more and more time with Eliza. I think Aaron may be a little jealous of Eliza because she is now getting all the attention but I don't think that is his real problem. I think he also wants to get closer to God and is not sure how so begins exploring other avenues other religions. He becomes involved with another religion and feels this may be what he has been looking for. When Saul finds this out all hell breaks loose and he finally realizes that the whole family has many problems.

Meanwhile Eliza thinks she is the reason for all that is happened and tries to converse with God to correct it. By this time Saul is convinced that God is interacting with Eliza when they go to the final spelling bee, The Nationals.

This is just a very basic outline of the movie, of course I have left out a lot of the movie because I don't want to give too much away and you should see this for yourself and come to your own conclusions. Give this movie a chance and I think you will like it.
25 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Unusual In Visually Conveying a Spirtual, Intellectual Family Drama
noralee28 November 2005
"Bee Season" is much better than the trailer foretold and almost surmounts a central miscasting to re-interpret the strongest aspects of Myla Goldberg's novel, which my Fiction Book Club had thoroughly enjoyed discussing.

The film blends a family drama with two popular interests, the Kabbalah and spelling bees. Unfortunately, the gimmicky celebrity populism of the former is accentuated with the wincible casting of Richard Gere as the father who is supposed to be a Talmudic scholar with a dissertation on Jewish mysticism.

When he was shown giving a simplistic lecture at multicultural UC Berkeley on the theme of tikkun olam (repairing the world) that is echoed throughout the film, I felt the only way I could accept him in the role at all would be to assume he was a gentile intro to comparative religion teacher, even though he has lines denigrating Jews who chant Hebrew in synagogue without understanding the language and about inspiring his French Catholic wife to convert. He does put across well how the patriarch bullies the family emotionally and controls them with food, rigid standards and attention, like a more subtle Great Santini, but he lacks the pale intensity of the obsessed and just seems another NPR-listening, Bach-duet playing intellectual.

Until the involving climax, though, there are ironically very little Hebrew numbers as letters to guide the secrets of the universe in the movie when the dad takes his spelling wunderkind daughter under his wing to teach her the power of language, but it does lead to the most powerful scenes in the film of letting us see what's going on inside her head. Flora Cross in her debut is the anti-Dakota Fanning in absolutely convincing us that she is in thrall to a supernatural gift and that her kabbalistic studies, which are usually forbidden to young people for their psychological dangers, are opening her up to hidden reservoirs of perception. It is completely exceptional that special effects can be so extraordinary and important to an intellectual family story, but they are not only enchanting but demonstrative. Cross naturally communicates how she intuitively is in touch with a force that her father can only enthusiastically theorize and not quite capture himself.

The sharp editing is superb at clarifying cross-currents from the book, and perhaps making it much easier, perhaps a bit too simplistically, to see how each member of the family is seeking the face of God in their own way. The son, dark heart throb in the budding Max Minghella, is, as usual, seduced by a bland blonde shiksa, Kate Bosworth, though with an unusual rebellious religious twist that here seems natural to the Berkeley environment. But then his Jewish religious education seemed pretty random.

The editing and the special effects also marvelously contrast the paternal theme with the other fractured visual theme of the kaleidescope that the mother favors. While Naomi Foner Gyllenhaal's adaptation (and it's nice to see Maggie and Jake's mom's work again) makes the details of the mom's increasingly disturbed activities more incomprehensible than in the book, Juliette Binoche superbly adds a fragility and depth to the role beyond the novel and makes her heartbreakingly sympathetic.

The conclusion is more emotional, if more pat, than in the book, though some interpretation is still possible.

In making the intellectual visible, the film also uses library settings as an inner sanctum very warmly.

Nice to hear the band Ivy on the soundtrack and over the credits.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Doubts about plot
Jackwilcox30 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I can see from the DVD's extra features that a lot of people claim to like this film, but they seem actually to like the idea the father develops, not the way the film actually carries out the idea. Is it true we can put back together things that are shattered? (Only sometimes, I think.) Does the film show that we can? Do the characters really do that? No, not that I can see--in answer to both of the latter questions. We are left with the girl making a strange gesture of failure; maybe it helps unite her father and brother, for a moment; but does it do anything else, to help with the serious problems in this family? Not that I can see. We seem set up for a miracle of sorts, and we don't get one; but the movie and its lovers act as if we do. PS I for one am not fond of movies in which children have strange inexplicable powers; but if they do, I want these powers to be put to some plausible use, at least.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Film to be Viewed with a Thirsty Mind
gradyharp7 April 2006
BEE SEASON is a strange little film that seems to polarize the public. Though many have dismissed it as fragmentary and superficial, taking the time to bear down on the issues merely touched upon yields an emotional as well as spiritual experience not often found in films. With a cast that includes Juliette Binouche and Richard Gere there should be a hint there may be more to the film than a quick glance might reveal.

Based on the highly successful novel by Myla Goldberg the story enters the household of a family of four: Saul (Richard Gere) is the father who is a professor of spiritual studies; Miriam (Juliette Binouche) is the mother suffering with demons from her past loss of her parents as a child leading her to grow without an intact family; Eliza (Flora Cross) is the daughter who seems content to watch TV instead of paying attention to her schooling; and Aaron (Max Minghella) is the son who excels at playing the cello and who is the focus of his father's life. When it is discovered that Eliza has a penchant for spelling and wins a spelling bee the focus of this family abruptly changes. Suddenly Saul moves his attention to Eliza, convinced that she has the power of the influx of God-knowledge (shefa) described by the Kabbalist Abraham Abulafia. This leads to his prepping her for her constant victories at spelling bees, but it also leaves Aaron without focus and he responds by seeking first Christianity then Hare Krishna for the meaning of his life. At the same time Miriam becomes more isolated and secretive and enters a state of depression that reflects her childhood loss and the need to accumulate 'things' in a number of ways that border on mental breakdown.

The film is best viewed, by the way, by first watching the featurette about the reasons for the making of the film - a wise commentary that gives us enough philosophical background to appreciate the message of the story that seemingly has eluded directors Scott McGehee and David Siegel. Watching the explanation of how religions all act to provide frameworks that should help individuals to piece together the fragments of existence that have been given to us as our lives serves to bring into focus how each of the four characters in this story is each on that journey for meaning. Once viewed, this featurette makes the movie far more meaningful and enjoyable.

The screenplay by Naomi Foner Gyllenhaal (yes, the mother of Maggie and Jake) is minimalist in technique of writing, giving just enough information about the big questions to make us work to paste the story together. The cinematography by Giles Nuttgens and special effects by Sean House are used extraordinarily well to underline the mysticism that permeates the film's story. Peter Nashel's musical score accompanies the otherworldly atmosphere that helps to bring the audience into the mood of the film.

This may not be a great film, but it is a unique one that calls upon the audience to think and free-associate with the characters, each of whom is well enacted by a strong cast. Well worth viewing. Grady Harp
49 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Hypnotic Superstition
far-talk15 March 2007
Bee Season is flatly based on the premise that words are ultimately incomprehensible and therefore magic. The movie makes a direct link from kabbala-sorcery to spelling bees in a way that is absolutely hilarious, but it seems the filmmakers will be the last to get the joke.

According to the dark and mysterious mythos of the movie, one can become god and so achieve telepathic and prophetic powers -- by meditating on the mysterious spelling of words. The more difficult a word's spelling, the more incomprehensible, and therefore the more magical. Rearrange words and magic numbers appear. Study the kabbala and you will have supernatural visions and become an expert speller. Oh boy.

Misinterpret the secret kabbala hidden in the spelling of English words and you will go insane and become a serial thief, as happened to one main character.

Although the movie was made in dead earnest, it is an unintentional commentary on how primitive human beings trapped in the Stone Age can walk among us in this age of high technology. Indeed technology and the complexities of spelling in English can stump any or most of us, but the primitive human sees in the inscrutability secret magic.

The movie's dead earnest handling of superstition can have you falling out of your chair in laughter, as it did me.

Or the movie's failure to show how spelling is magic and the movie's slow, very slow, move to an embarrassingly predictable end will have you falling out of your chair asleep.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Mystism of Spelling
brenttraft20 November 2005
"The Bee Season" is a difficult, but potentially rewarding film if you are willing to put forth the effort.

The problem with the film is that it does not condescend to the viewer. The film makers do not spell things out for the viewers and they force the viewers to think for themselves.

This is not a film about spelling bees. The film is about a seemingly upscale family but underneath they have a lot of problems.

It is well filmed and most of the acting is good. I thought Richard Gere was miscast and would have preferred a more dramatic actor. I liked the surreal affects when Eliza is coming up with the correct spelling.

If you are looking for a light diversion, this is not the film for you. If you are looking for a challenge, "The Bee Season" might be a rewarding experience.
10 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful
makuelker3 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This was classical of todays culture.... lets try to find ourselves...and at the same time take no responsibility for our actions.

Richard Gere is a great actor...the only redeeming quality to this movie. The other actors do their best.

I don't get why she did that at the end...

What was with all the mystic religions... It just really showed me just how far off base someone can go when they are being self centered as everyone in this family was.

Don't waste your money on this one! There has to be better out there...although at this point I'm not sure there is.

We get movies usually about 3 weeks to up to a year after you all do in the states. I appricate this because I can hear lots of commits before actually seeing a movie.

Again...the only reason we saw it was because of the cast!
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A film about a family - dealing with it's own problems in its own special way.
adebeer29 May 2007
I loved the film - it was dark, yes, but I liked the intrigue that is so common in all of our everyday lives - each one of that family wanted attention - not all in the correct way, but don't we all in our own special way? Richard Gere, as usual, was lovely to look at!!!!! No one overplayed and I was left with a feeling of uncertainty and I am still thinking about the film today. What should have been the main attention - namely the little girl's wonderful ability to spell - was in the end equaled and even overshadowed by her brother's search for religion, the father's search for acknowledgment and the mother's search for herself. All in all it was a lovely film and one you can watch with your children - a scarce thing these days.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't get stung
bigdgun18 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is an astonishingly bad movie! The plot starts out strong, then vanishes. There are so many questions that are created and too many that are never answered and by the end of the film, I was too frustrated to care. In particular, Juliette Binoche's (I lover this actress and used to feel she could do no wrong) character goes nuts...overnight without warning. Although we are slowly told why, we come to realize that has actually been happening for years. But I guess she finally breaks down, who knows! The kids both did a good job, but if you're not a fan of cults (see Scientology and Hari Krishna) don't waste your time.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mysterious
moviesleuth216 January 2009
"Bee Season" is an engrossing little film, despite being very strange. I've wanted to see this film ever since I saw its beautiful trailer, and I have to say, the trailer is nothing like the movie (though maybe that's a good thing anyway, since it gives the public a listen to Scott Mallone's haunting song). Still, it warrants a recommendation, if you're in the mood for something a little different. Okay, something VERY different.

"Bee Season" tells the story of a Californian family (not the kind one would normally associate with California-this isn't Newport Beach). Saul (Richard Gere) is the patriarch, a professor who studies Jewish mysticism. Mother Miriam (Juliette Binoche) is a scientist who practices some rather unusual activities outside the home and the lab. Aaron (Max Minghella) finds new religion. And daughter Eliza (Flora Cross) finds herself at the center of attention when she wins a spelling bee.

The film touches on a lot of elements; some of which I got, others I didn't. Directors Scott McGhee and David Siegel use many literary techniques to adapt Myla Goldberg's novel to the screen. Symbolism is prominent both in meaning and approach (I won't go into details to avoid giving anything away).

The acting really centers around the four leads. Richard Gere has geared his time towards roles that allow him to act instead of be a "moviestar." His portrayal of Saul is excellent. He is so self-absorbed that he is blind to everyone else's needs and emotions. Gere allows him to be aloof, but ordinary on the surface, not stuck up (he believes in what he's saying). Juliette Binoche is excellent as always (I can't say anything more). Max Minghella is great as the jealous older brother, though he doesn't go for the cliché and take it out on Eliza, he goes for the source (Saul). Newcomer Flora Cross is excellent as Eliza, who has so much suddenly thrown upon her shoulders.

In a way, "Bee Season" is more of a mystery than a suburban drama (though it contains heavy elements of the latter). The story elements are presented a little at a time, and the focus switches from person to person. Yet McGhee and Siegel keep everything flowing like water, and it never drags. The film draws you in and completely envelops you with its spell. Credit goes to the director for being able to do that.

I recommend the film, but its not for everyone. It's for people who pay attention and appreciate intelligent drama. Flawed, but worth your time if that describes you.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What was the point?
bigal_ar21 April 2006
This movie seemed to drag on forever with no real point. There were a lot of confused messages about religion. And an ending that did anything but leave you feeling satisfied about paying $2.59 to rent the movie. It could have been a really good movie, but instead of going for something heartwarming or along good story lines, it seemed that the movie was going for more of a new age feel. The only good thing that I can really remember from the movie was the way in which you were left in suspense about what was wrong with the wife. Eliza was good. Her part was well acted and as always Richard Gere did a great job in his role. At least it was clean.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a mesmerizing tour de force: don't miss it!
filmfan7512 September 2005
I saw this film last night at the Toronto Film Festival. I am a fan of the book, and wondered how the story could be successfully adapted as a film. I worried that the ideas were too complicated, the characters too subtle, to make the transition. When I heard that Richard Gere was going to play the role of the father, I had more serious doubts. (Richard Gere playing a Jew? Almost as ridiculous as Melanie Griffith!) But I needn't have worried. The film is nearly a masterpiece. A subtle, emotional journey through a world of spelling bees, Hare Krishna, Kaballah, Kleptomania, and the gorgeously rendered interior spaces of the imagination. Beautiful, original special effects, delightful characters, great acting. The girl who plays the daughter is excellent, as are the other actors. Juliette Binoche is heartbreaking and mysterious, Richard Gere is perfectly cast as the self-absorbed (Jewish!) father, and Anthony Minghella's son is also in the movie, believe it or not, and he's very good.

There are changes from the book. But the overall feeling is very similar. The movie is neither as funny or as dark as Myla Goldberg's novel. But the end might be more emotionally satisfying. See for yourself! You won't be disappointed if you approach with an open mind. Not for the cynical, or for the action film junkie, but I found this a delightful, rich, and emotional journey. Definitely a 10! Put it on the Oscar watch.
86 out of 153 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good plot with some unfortunate boggy bits
wisewebwoman24 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
And the first boggy bit was the serious miscasting of Richard Gere as a Jewish Talmud/Kabbalah professor (I seem to recall him in another odd role, an ob/gyn). Richard is quite able but only in more believable parts, those particularly involving his terrific good looks. Disbelief thus gets suspended in the first five minutes of this movie.

And no, the story is not about spelling bees but about enlightenment and wisdom - through words.

However, the rest of the casting is superb, Juliette Binoche as the mother is marvellous in every scene, her sadness permeates both the screen and the viewer and there is a wonderful use of brief flashbacks, broken spectacles and glass, to push her story through and we gain a total understanding of the darkness that overtook her when her parents died in an accident. She has been seeking the light ever since.

Flora Cross, in her first role, is amazing in her understated role of Eliza, the eleven year old spelling whiz. She holds all the wisdom of the family.

Max Minghella plays the son and defies the challenge of some rather awful dialogue to convey the son who loves and understands his sister but is baffled by his controlling father and fragile mother.

Disbelief is again suspended when this son is swept into the Hare Krishnas far too quickly (it was all about lust, you see) and then, just as swiftly, swept out at the speed of light by the furious father.

I found the whole business with the mother, Miriam, ex-French Catholic, Jewish convert, totally believable in her seeking of the light and the final expose, much to the shock and horror of her husband, was beautifully done. Miriam hides from her family, terrified by the taking of her daughter (whom she questions about darkness and light)by the husband. Her son has already been removed from her in the same way.

The final scene, to me, answered all the questions that threaded through the movie. Count the many gifts this wise and brilliant young girl gives to her family and the dawning of that realization on the face of the father, who in spite of his academic understanding is the furthest from the light of all of them. Beautiful and understated. Magic movie moment. 7 out of 10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unbearably twee, drags, unrepresentative Hare Krishna bit
AJ10819 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
We took this film out to see the Hare Krishna bit. But it was rather disappointing. There was no explanation of why the son was attracted to Hare Krishna beyond being attracted to the pretty Hare Krishna girl Charlie. She gives him a book, but we cannot see the cover. Dad gives plenty of speculative quasi-religious philosophy in his lecture and to the daughter, so why we are spared so much as a "we are not these bodies" is beyond me. Then before you can click your fingers, the son is wearing the saffron robes of a bramachari monk while being woken by Charlie's kisses in the temple. Yeah, right. The producers did involve devotees, submitted a script and received suggestions back, but apparently ignored the feedback, and preferred to leave the Krishna conscious part confused and enigmatic. The one good bit is a great kirtana. Then the first time the dad shows any interest in his son it is to charge into the temple, threatening the devotee who answers the door to get his son "back". Yawn.

Apart from that, the film seriously drags. You could summarise what happens in about three sentences. Plus, it's unbearably twee, with non-stop emotional moments. The ending is similarly confused and enigmatic. I suppose the acting is good, but you can't make a good film out of a bad script. No stars.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed