Battlestar Galactica (TV Series 2004–2009) Poster

(2004–2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
855 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
What makes us human?
morethanwho27 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
BSG is a wonderful sci-fi series! In the midst of the battles between the human kind and the robots, the dark sides of the people are exposed whereas the robots display in themselves what humanity should be. The desire to survive, the yearning for the Earth, and the hope for the future drive both the humans and the robots as the distinctions between them gradually disappear.

The casting was exceptional and the performances were more than convincing. The actors did excellent jobs in expressing the emotional struggles within and without. The dynamic and unpredictable story lines demanded feats of acting skills and they all performed to high standards. There were a lot of breath-halting cliffhangers, palm-sweating suspense, and eye-widening surprises.

At times, some of the narrations seemed to be a bit preachy. There were times when the decisions of the people on the ship were too predictable and childish. I had an impression that the ending was rather rushed.

BSG kept asking us the same question "What makes us human?" In this regards, this TV series reminded me of a book called 'Somewhere carnal over 40 winks'.

I hope for more of realistic sci-fi series like BSG in the future.
1,405 out of 1,488 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Cult Classic, I'd choose over GoT
prateekgupta-9153115 June 2019
This is a cult classic, that I believe everyone should watch. I was in the middle of the third season when GoT final season aired, and I couldn't put this down long enough to watch GoT!

It's intense, deeply philosophical, and felt like something I was willing to commit more energy into than into any relationship I've had, ever! (While that says a thing or two about me, it definitely says A LOT about this series)
117 out of 139 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Quite simply the best sci-fi show ever made
Ghostbusterx6 November 2009
When George Lucas announced that he was to make the Star Wars prequels I had this preconception of a darker, better acted, and more more grown up version of the movies that were made in the late seventies - early eighties. Instead we got a bunch of kids movies, littered with some of the most terrible cinematic decisions ever put on celluloid.

And then the re-imagined Battlestar Galactica came along, which I must add, I watched from start to finish only after the show had made it's debut on mainstream television.

I was initially sceptical of whether this would be any good, but after having reached the finale I can honestly say that this is quite simply the best sci-fi show ever made. The scripts are top notch, the acting superb with a real heart and soul, and characters that, even with their faults, will be remembered with great affection by the viewers for many years to come.

This is the template for all future TV shows. I't does not overstay it's welcome, knows when to stop, and constantly delivers fresh, new ideas as the seasons progress.

Series 1 was a great introduction; series 2 built on the initial success and delivered some of the shows highlights; season 3 was awesome for the first half (until the writers strike kicked in just after half way - but still highly entertaining); and season 4 put the icing on the cake with what I consider to be a tremendous and satisfying end to this great series.

The only downside was that I wished it could have continued, but I guess it is better to exit on a high and leave the crowd wanting more.

For me this has stripped Star Wars of it's crown and raised the bar where although it may one day be equalled, will never be bettered.

Awesome
426 out of 573 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sci-fi for Grown-Ups
Iok10 December 2004
Before I proceed, I'll just add a quick comment for those slating the series without seeing it: please, stop it. Instead, wait and see what the new show is about and give it a chance. Unless of course, you want to miss one of the best dramas currently airing...

BSG is a very human story. Yet unlike Star Trek, they're not resolved by the end of the episode. Here the characters are real people who make mistakes, grow and learn from their errors. Or maybe they don't...

The point is that in the new BSG, the impact of the loss of the Colonies is something everybody must deal with, be it on a resource-management level to dealing with the loss of their families. The impact of the Cylon attack - never explored in the original series - is a major emphasis in the show and the viewer genuinely does get the feeling of the "rag tag fleet."

Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the original series as much as anybody, but it was a product of its time and audience-slot. The new BSG is a much more adult production, both in terms of the writing and performances and the intended audience.

Additionally, the show is very non-sci-fi, but in a good way. Whenever any "science" turns up, it's integrated in such a way as to have minimal impact on the plot and, unlike Star Trek, it isn't used as a Deus Ex Machina to simply resolve the "crisis of the week." In fact, I'd go as far as to say the show is closer to 24 or The West Wing than it is Star Trek or Babylon 5, with the focus being much more on the people and their individual actions, rather than a wide-scale "space opera."

Performances are all strong, with James Callis being the real star. His tortured performance as the guilt-stricken Baltar are a joy to watch as he flips from near-hysterical lunatic to scheming toad to smooth womaniser. Olmos has the presence to give Adama the air of authority required. Sackhoff's performance as Starbuck is "subtly obvious" - she plays the brash, cocky pilot a little too well, something that's explained in later episodes. And Bamber's Apollo is a mix of heroic action and self-doubt which balances well. Mention must also go to McDonnell's President Roslin who, over the course of the series, has grown in stature and presence in a very subtle manner.

Quite simply, Battlestar Galactica is one of the most consistently strong shows I've ever seen. Considering this is only the first of (hopefully) many seasons, it's amazing to see how the show has "hit the ground running," with each episode being an improvement on the last. And considering the high standard of the first one, that's quite the achievement.

Watch it. You won't be disappointed.
1,518 out of 2,214 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Still the King of the Genre
Felis_lynx5 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Before "The Expanse" appeared on my radar, I would have called BSG the best SciFi series without competition. Now it gracefully shares the throne.

This show is also referred to as the "reimagined" version of Battlestar Galactica, and I think this is an accurate description considering that one cannot really call it a remake. I have to admit that I never watched the original BSG series from the late 1970s. If I'm being honest, I don't think I ever will. However, it's interesting to see how both shows managed to address the geopolitical context of their time in their own, unique way. The original BSG was known to be a parable of the Cold War (with the robotic, swarm-intelligent Cylons clearly representing the Soviets). In contrast, the reimagined BSG has tackled its post 9/11 context and explores themes like religious fanaticism (the monotheistic Cylons), which is juxtaposed with the more liberal, polytheistic society of the human colonies. It speaks volumes that the main threat to the human colonial society is not just the incessant pursuit of the cylons, but the militarization, securitization, and decay of democratic institutions amongst the human survivors. One of the most interesting parts of the show looks at the problem of occupation from the perspective of the occuppied and the collaborators in their midst - some scenes are characteristically filmed with the greenish tint of night-vision cameras that could as well show CNN footage of raiding houses in Fallujah, Iraq.

It is much to the credit of the show that none of these political allusions are entirely obvious or unequivocal. BSG is not a show that aims to make political statements, it's rather a show that draws attention to the fact that things are never as easy or clear-cut as we would like them to be - and that in political and military affairs, the road to hell is often paved with the best of intentions.

On this note, the genre of BSG is not just science fictions, it's (more specifically) military science fiction. The creators of the show seem to have developed an entire body of theory and doctrine on ship-to-ship combat in space. While I don't want to enter any endless discussion of "realism", I personally found the way BSG portrays combat in outer space very fascinating and (within the confines of the show) consistent. Suffice it to say, it is heavily influenced by a meticulous study World War II naval battles. While CGI technology was not what it is today, most of the scenes in space are aesthetically very pleasing and the space battles are amongst the most engaging I have ever seen in this genre.

On a more general level, the looks and visual atmosphere of BSG are just as impressive as the complex and well-crafted storyline. Ships feel appropriately claustrophobic, they are heavily armored hulks of steel with wires, metallic bulkheads, and flickering neon lights - in many ways the exact opposite of what you might find in "Star Trek". The few planetary surfaces of the show are equally unique, from the over-saturated green of the fallen Garden Eden of Cobol and the sickly yellow tint of irradiated Caprica to the barren planes of New Caprica and the bubbling miasma of the "Algae Planet".

The entire storyline of the show is truly remarkable. After the existential shock of the opening episodes, which depicted nothing less than the nuclear holocaust of an interplanetary human civilization, the show remained thrilling and very tense - almost as if there was a dark, constant undercurrent running through every single episode. At the same time, the introduction of both mystical and mysterious elements - BSG later became famous for it's "circular view of history" - captured my imagination. I still shudder thinking about the strangely meaningful, yet utterly senseless, dadaistic poetry of the human-cylon hybrids who have gone mad from what was never meant to be fused ("End of line"). The different models of the "skin jobs" are equally fascinating, especially after it dawns upon the viewer that each of these (slightly different) non-individuals follows the same patterns and maximes of behaviour (e.g. Lioben always lies).

The same fascination extends to the human characters: One of my all-time favorites was William Adama, the intransigant patriarch, sometimes a fatherly caretaker, sometimes a ruthless military commander with tyrannic tendencies. (Take note of some of the later scenes where Adama and his XO Tigh engage into serious orgies of boozing that usually degerate into the spiteful ramblings of disappointed old men). The brilliantly acted Kara Thrace, whose inner struggles and desparation were almost palpable, is another great example of this show's memorable spectrum of characters.

Bottom line: This show is a must-see for every fan of intelligent science fiction. It is also warmy recommended to anybody who does not fit this description.
56 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wow, now reviews in 9 years... this is an old show worth discovering, Fantastic!
Blumanowar25 September 2019
I've just finished Season one on Amazon Prime and I must say this is the best sci-fi show I've seen in years. And I've seen all the SyFy channel shows and new SciFi movies of the last few years. I cannot wait to watch the remaining shows. Better by far than the original Star Trek series or movies... it makes Expanse, Dark Matter and other new shows look inept (and I'd resigned myself to fact that those were about as good as we were going to get)... if you haven't seen this series, let me tell you the writing and acting is first class. It's even a little sexy, something you rarely see in SciFi. I'm loving it!!!!
53 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I've watched it all before and I'll watch it all again!
Tweekums22 February 2012
Having watched the original series as a child I put off watching this for some time expecting it to be a virtual remake but with CGI and characters who had been gender switched for no obvious reason... I'm glad I eventually decided to watch it though as I could not have been more wrong! This is nothing like the light hearted original that I loved as a child; series creator Ronald D. Moore has taken the original premise and made something much darker and much more grown up. As with the original the series starts with the destruction of the Twelve Colonies where humanity has settled and the survivors head off into space in search of the mythical thirteenth colony; Earth. Here the similarities end though; the Cylons that destroyed the colonies weren't crated by aliens; they were created by humanity and rebelled against their masters. As well as the familiar Centurions we soon learn that there are some Cylons that can't be distinguished from people and some of those don't even realise they are Cylons. As humanity flees they will have to struggle against both Cylons and themselves if they are to survive and find their new home.

I really enjoyed this series; the story may have been familiar but the characters were much deeper than in the version I saw as a child and there wasn't the feeling that if a character was a regular they would inevitably survive; in fact many major characters die including some that manage to survive for several seasons. The cast did a fantastic job; most notably Edward James Olmos, Mary McDonnell, Katie Sackhoff, Grace Park, Jamie Bamber, Michael Hogan, Tricia Helfer and James Callis... and even listing this many stand out performances seems unfair on the rest as just about everybody was great! Fans of the original series will be pleased to see Richard 'Apollo' Hatch return; this time his character, Tom Zarek, is far from heroic. I don't usually think to comment on the music for a series but here I must as composer Bear McCreary did such a fine job and later on some of the music is actually integral to the plot. As with all series there are some weaker episodes but even the poor Galactica episodes are better than much of what is on television. When the series finished I was left wanting more but all the key story threads had been tied up and it was good that it ended while it was still good rather than overstaying its welcome. If you haven't seen this series yet I strongly recommend it; just remember to watch the miniseries before series one as that sets up the whole story.
33 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
10 reasons why you shouldn't watch Battlestar Galactica
lamiable1 January 2010
1. If you want mindless techno-babble, then this show isn't for you. 2. If you don't manage to appreciate what good... no, let me rephrase that for you: exquisite acting is, then you definitely shouldn't watch it. 3. If you expect to have a crew of four, including a science doctor, an alien, a military and some random Indiana Jones guy, all of them solving new let's-save-the-Earth-before-lunch problems, then skip BSG, is not for you. 4. If you're afraid of seeing real human stories put into a SF shell, perhaps you should go back to Star Trek (and I'm a trekkie too, but...) 5. If you crave to hear 'shields up' or 'engage' or other classic one- liners, then you should rather settle for "frak". Or is it "frakk"? 6. If you're unable to follow a 4 season-long story arc with every episode adding something precious to it without having withdrawal symptoms, then you should really don't give it a try. 7. If all that you want is see people in tight suits flashing laser pistols and teleporting from harms' way, then change the channel. 8. If your interest for spiritual quests, tough sexy girls and people really dying and not returning is something like zero. Oh well, you might skip that 'dying and not returning part' :P 9. If you don't like space battles rendered so real (and with as most care for real physics as a TV SF show can take) that you feel you ARE there. 10. Finally, if you have a mind so closed that you cannot appreciate what the best SF show ever made is all about.

In my opinion, any problem that somebody would have with this show would be his/her problem, not the shows. For the rest of us, BSG raised the bar so high, we almost cannot enjoy other SF shows anymore.

But then... we can always re-watch it, and hope others will learn from it, too.
381 out of 591 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Rewatched in 2020, it still is an amazing military space opera
Dracomilan2 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
BSG is an extremely well-acted and appropriately-casted sci-fi mil opera. Not a single role is miscast, not a single scene (even if farfetched) is badly acted. The show uses the old Galactica for names, setting and ship shapes, but the lore is all new (here the cylons were created by humans and have an assimilation plan). Since the show was not scripted with a long arc in mind, some short arcs are slow, convoluted or not interesting (Helo on Caprica, Baltar the Prophet) but when the writing room nails it, BSG is solid gold (Miniseries, 33, Pegasus, Razor, first discovery of Earth). CGI still good after some years, even if on 4K TV some effects seem naive (dead Sharon, all in-atmosphere explosions). Still worth your time!
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Different? Yes, Better? Absolutely!
sktrucking4 June 2006
As a child of the 70's I can say that I loved the original BSG and always wanted a proper return to the story, not that lame attempt called "Gallactica" with the guy from "Adam 12". However, I was skeptical about this new show because of the core changes, like making Starbuck and Boomer female, for example. It didn't matter. This is one of the best TV shows ever made. It's dramatic, funny, sad, extremely dark and immensely engrossing. By changing the character of Baltar from a ruthless power hungry madman in the original to the witless and sympathetic patsy that he is at the beginning of this show creates a whole new dynamic to this character and his development. Adding the president to be a counter balance to Adama instead of the commander automatically ruling over everyone was far more believable than the council full of wusses that were supposed to be in charge in the '78 version.

Bottom line, the stories are more intense, the characters are stronger, the suspense can drive you mad. This show is addictive to say the least. The creators have brought a realism to this idea that just wasn't there in the original. In '78, the show was a campy attempt to capitalize on the Star Wars phenomenon that was definitely entertaining, but was also a little too convenient in its "everything works out by the end of the episode" theme. Life isn't like that. This new version completely escapes from the happy family sweetness of a '70's TV series. Battlestar Gallactica(2004) is a more believable life and death struggle because people actually die in this series. The only noteworthy death in the original was that of Serena, and that was in the first 3 to 5 hours of the series. These people are fighting for their lives. They're not all going to make it. The last scene of season 1 had me and all my friends jumping out of our seats yelling "NOOOOO! They didn't just do that!!! They can't leave it like that!! When does the next season start?!?!?!?!" Not many shows have had that kind of effect on me in my life, and I watch way too much TV.

In closing, BSG(04) is a fantastic show. If you were a fan of the original, savor it for what it was, but give this reincarnation a chance, I think you'll love it.
325 out of 520 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Extremely addictive, but not without its imperfections
TheLittleSongbird16 October 2016
This is going to be very similarly worded to my review for the 'Battlestar Galactica' pilot from 2003, but that's due to having so much of the same great things. 1978's 'Battlestar Galactica' was, and still is, a lot of fun to watch and has a lot of great things, such as most of the production values, the music and the cast. Flaws and all, there is still a soft spot for the show.

At the same time, it was a long way from a flawless show, with the problems more noticeable to an adult audience, such as annoying child actors, the character of Muffit II, the tone not always being focused and too many homages that distracted from the main plot-line. When 'Battlestar Galactica' was good, it was great, as seen with "War of the Gods" which took a darker approach and ended up epitomising what the show is all about. When the show was not good, like with "The Young Lords", it was cringe-worthy.

There was the worry as to whether the pilot mini-series and this show would fall into the same camp as 'Galactica 1980', which had one great episode, "The Return of Starbuck", and one great scene, the attack of the Cylons on Los Angeles, but is down there as one of the most pointless and unnecessary shows ever made. Not only making the mistakes as the original 'Battlestar Galactica' did but amplifying them and making more on the way.

Watching the pilot and this show in its entirety over-time, neither go anywhere near in the territory of being another 'Galactica 1980'. Will be going out on a limb, but both are improvements over the original 'Battlestar Galactica', but other than having the same title and names they are very different and should be judged separately. Speaking of the show, there are improvements over the pilot, Tigh, who was a flat character in the pilot, is much more interesting and developed and Starbuck is more toned down while still showing a sassy, tough and no-nonsense personality.

The shaky camera work occasionally getting excessively for no real reason flaw is still present however, and if you want accurate science fiction or computer science look elsewhere, the science is barely there and lazily researched when there and the computer science is convoluted gibberish. There are also things done worse here, the special effects are not as good as the rest of the production values, not cheap but do look rather rushed. The character of Roslin is also much more likable and heartfelt in the pilot, here the character while showing glimpses of the affecting and complex personality traits shown in the pilot also has an off-putting holier than thou and hypocritical attitude and Mary McDonnell overdoes it at times in the acting, especially some shrill line delivery and her facial expressions.

Judging the seasons, Seasons 1 and 2 are absolutely phenomenal and some of the most riveting television ever made. Season 3 started off great but lost some of its momentum halfway through, while Season 4 was very disappointing with things taking a bizarre and very confused turn, characters being over-written and out of character and then ideas started getting resolved in a flat and simplistic manner and in ways all too convenient and too much by chance.

On the other hand, let's talk about what is so good about 'Battlestar Galactica' (2004) in its prime and why to me it's an improvement on the 1970s show.

The tone is much more consistent. It's dark, bold, moody and sombre compared to the more light-hearted and admittedly sometimes cheesy tone of the original, and while it was different it was interesting and avoided generally being clinical and cold. It clearly knows what tone it's trying to take, without trying to be too many things all at once which would fall into the traps of being bloated and under-explored, and what target audience it's aiming to appease to, without trying too hard to appeal to them. The characters have much more depth, with complex and nuanced personalities (the heroes have flaws as well as strengths, while the more villainous characters are more than standard villains with a sympathetic and humane edge while also being a threat). Baltar in particular is brilliantly developed.

The Cylons are more consistently characterised, being more of a threat rather than being indecisively written, and there are no annoying child actors or any character down there with the likes of Muffit II or Doctor Zee from 'Galactica 1980'. The production values are top notch mostly, especially in the stylish and moodily atmospheric photography when not excessively shaky, the dynamic and foreboding lighting and awe-inspiring sets. The music is haunting and moody with also with melancholy and nuanced pathos without being overly-bombastic or sappy, approaches that would have sounded wrong within the show. The action also crackles thrillingly.

Writing is as layered and complex as the characters, as well as being more focused tonally and the story-lines more consistent. It's very insightful and thought-provoking, and resists going into overload of cheese or mawkish sentimentality. The political, military and social commentaries are powerful. While taking time to develop, the stories when the show was in its prime are still incredibly compelling with a lot going on while still being very much cohesive. There is no padding and the concept is always obvious with little getting in the way. The acting is very good, especially from dignified and authoritative Edward James Olmos and James Callis who brings a lot of dimension to a character much more complex than just your standard villain.

On the whole, not without imperfections and Season 4 really does not live up to the first two seasons but 'Battlestar Galactica' is still extremely addictive and intriguing stuff. 7.5/10 Bethany Cox
22 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Greatest Sc-Fi show ever, So say we all.
PeterWorthers5 May 2008
I am a die hard devoted Trekker. No other show can come close to the series I hold so dear to my heart.... or can it? I watched the mini series on sci-fi expecting to be disappointed. What happened in reality was a show I will honestly say is second to none, the best science fiction out there. The story lines are top notch, the struggles make you feel for the characters, you really get into this show. (that and I have never found a robot so hot before. Did I just say that out loud?) The way the camera moves makes you feel like you are looking out a port hole at the action outside. Its not like other shows, this is hard hitting, nitty-gritty sci-fi. Unlike what we have been led to think the future is not all bright and promising , the future is bleak, hard and depressing. The technology we thought would make our lives easier will in fact be the end of our lives (FEAR THE MACHINE!!) Bad toaster. It is 4 seasons (and final sadly) in and still as entertaining as ever. It will be a sad day for geeks everywhere when the series finale airs. But at least we can live in the knowledge that we were here to see the series to end all series. So Say We All.
240 out of 401 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Compelling at times. A chore to get through at other times.
reb-warrior22 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
It started off with a great season one, but gradually deteriorated over time. Season three was the worst.

Kara and Apollo were the worst characters. They were the "star" characters and got the most screentime. They both were domestic abusers of each other, and the writers tried to write that as romantic. Yeah, frak off. Kara was a bully and an idiot most of the time. Apollo was the most boring character on the show. He was so vanilla, that he was a yawn. The writers didn't know what to do with him and kept giving him new job titles until eventually, he devolved into a politician. These two were both a drain on the show, especially in season 3.

Hate that Caprica Six lost her mojo after resurrecting. Remember how the mini series began? She killed a baby and orchestrated the genocide of the human on Caprica. Later she got involved with Saul which was forced, awkward, and stupid. This relationship was completely swept under the rug late in the last season.

The Final Five seemed like an "omg, what a shocking twist," moment. Then went downhill after that. Ellen as the final one seemed like a joke. So she's a part of the scientists that created the resurrection? LMAO. Gimme a break. Speaking of which, I had to go online to read some sites in order to understand the Cylon history and how the Final Five were explained. The show didn't do a good job of it. Everything went so fast that I didn't have time to think about it and connect the dots when Sam, Ellen, and Cavil explained everything. Of course, they only made this up in the last season. Sheesh.

The Opera House scene at the end of season 4, seemed kind of anti-climatic. The repeating vision and all that build-up for that? Kind of weak. Tho I did appreciate Baltar's reasoning with Cavil. My favorite character is Baltar. Great acting by the actor. Baltar was interesting, funny, and introspective. His philosophizing and squirming "not to get caught" made him fun to watch. Not to mention all the scenes with Six in his head.

Sharon/Boomer should have been the most compelling characters on the show. Unfortunately, I found her too vanilla. Even when Boomer was deceptive and doing bad stuff, she was still vanilla. The actress wasn't very charismatic, and I think that's what made the characters ho-hum to me. Helo was great. He was one of the humans I really liked. A voice for the underdog, and yet stayed true to the commands he received.

D'Anna Biers was my favorite Cylon. She was different from the rest which were either rebels or the colony. She had her own path. I found her intriguing and fun. I wished they had more of her in the show. Imagine having Lucy Lawless and not utilizing her more. Great actress. She has a huge fanbase that would have stuck with the show through thick and thin just to see her. Another character that I really liked was Lampkin. He was fun and interesting. A charismatic character and actor. Definitely wished there was more of him in the show.

What the frak happened to you Chief? For the first three seasons, you were a pretty decent character. Then they made you a Cylon. They got rid of your wife. They got rid of your kid. Last I saw of you, you were sitting on the ground after killing Tory. We didn't even get to see what path in life you were heading into on New Earth.

I only started liking Laura sometime in the third season. Same with Saul. Imagine Saul is one of the final five. So he was a scientist? Seems so laughable. They never should have made him a Cylon. Kara was an angel? They made it up in the last season. That was just poor writing. I think it would have been better if Laura and Kara had been Cylons. With Laura being the top-dog Cylon. Also, I love the idea of Adama falling for a Cylon.

Adama wasn't my favorite character. But he was in the least the top five or six. I think more importantly the actor had a presence that dominated the screen. He brought a certain gravitas that worked for the character. I definitely like Adama, but sometimes was annoyed by him. Such as when he didn't listen to Helo about the Sagittarian situation or ignored the prophecies Laura mentions. I didn't care for drunk Adama. And the father/son stuff between him and Apollo got tired.

As for the ending, well it makes sense in a lot of ways. "This had happened before and will happen again." Seems like a dire warning about AI. But is the problem really with AI, or is it with human beings? I'd say the latter. The ending seemed a little kumbayah for my tastes. I kept waiting for the other foot to fall but it never did. Seemed kinda dumb Apollo's idea to give up their technology. I mean they know about the Cylons. The planet would be without protection. Neo-Luddism for the Capricans. Seems similar to the Sagittarians. No, I believe the answer was to learn from their mistakes and go forward and evolve. The answer stared them right in the face from the beginning. The Cylons including the Centurians were sentient beings and they needed to work together, not make war with each other. Also what about the people that were left behind on Caprica? No way that the few survivors Starbuck came with were the only ones. She was only at a small location on the big giant planet. No one wants to rescue/help them? Also when the Cylons all went to New Caprica to occupy it, did they all leave old Caprica? I'm kinda confused about that.

I found the show compelling to watch at times. The idea of it is so interesting. The worst thing for me was the "Kara and Apollo show." That was such a drain, especially in season three that despite the show being compelling I almost quit. But I wanted to see how the show would wrap up, so then it became a chore just to get through it to reach the end. As far as I'm concerned they ruined the show in many ways. I think that's why people probably walking away from it when it aired. Oddly enough, I loved Apollo and Starbuck in the old 78' version. Anyway, I gave this a 7/10.
29 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Pretentious and ponderous, but ultimately very weak
jmgindiana14 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
After watching the whole series, I must say this was a total disappointment, and the ultimate proof about how things are done in Hollywood: good contacts, speaking loud, and making the audience believe they are smarter than they really are because the series it's "intelligent".

From the very beginning there were lots of things that didn't add up, but we let them pass, such as full-election process in a refugee fleet, including public debates and such, as if anyone of the 48.000 survivors could care about politicians after their worlds, friends and family had just been killed. Boomer's sabotages to the fleet didn't make much sense, but they were interesting. Cain's "reimagining" was just a one-dimensional creation, a square warmonger who -as always happens with writers who dislike the military- is ultimately proved wrong in almost everything she does. Things got gradually worse, starting with the one-year jump, and the introduction of the "final five", a concept that most likely was spurned by fans who were asking themselves who were the remaining "models", instead of writers who actually had anything planned for those characters.

While the show garnered critical acclaim, viewers left in droves. Those who remained could be ultimately divided into two groups: the fanatics, for whom anything with the brand "Galactica" (excluding the old show) was God turned into television, and regular viewers who were giving the show the benefit of the doubt, hoping that things could be salvaged at the end with a plausible explanation.

The show's decline, however, became even more pronounced in the last seasons. Instead of fixing the glaring problems of the previous seasons, they introduced new ones, contradicting a lot of stuff, and creating whole story lines -the aforementioned "final five", for example- that in the end turned out to be just a big red herring. Even worse, they committed the worse sin for a show supposedly grounded in reality, even being sci-fi: they resorted to "divine intervention" to explain the whole plot and most of the central story lines. Two characters, one barely seen, suddenly became "angels", while another was turned into a "divine creature", without even the most basic explanation. The whole epilogue for the characters was a disaster, pulling the "emotional strings" while throwing logic out of the window.

To add insult to injury, the show's lack of appeal forced a number of obvious budget cuts, but at the same time, the number of episodes per season was increased from 13 to 20. As a result, we ended up with a sci-fi show with little sci-fi at all, with almost no action to speak of (space or otherwise), and tons of episodes to the top with filler. Of course, that filler was filmed as if it were "relevant" and "dramatic", with hand held cameras and dramatic lighting, no matter if it was just two guys speaking about nothing in a corridor.

As always, a number of fanatics claimed, as they will always claim, that the show was about the characters, about "drama", and never about space battles and such. They are wrong. Battlestar Galactica was sold as a sci-fi drama, not just "drama", and that's the reason it was green lit in the first place. Those who claim that Galactica was always what it turned out to be in the last disastrous seasons should take a look at what it was in the beginning.

In the end, the problem was one person -Ron Moore- with too much power and ego to make "just" a sci-fi series. He had the means, and ultimately proved his detractors right exactly about what they were trying to say from the beginning: that Moore, and Galactica, were all show and no substance, with soap-operish drama, weak actors -with a few exceptions in Olmos, McDonnell and a couple more-. Not only that, but by trying to write himself out of his corner, Moore's writing turned most of the events in the earlier seasons totally unnecessary, ruining the series as a whole.

So farewell, BSG 2004. You went the way of the do-do at the end, and just like the X-Files, managed to survive as long as you could avoid giving answers. I doubt anyone would want to re-watch the series knowing how useless everything turns out to be.
341 out of 654 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Re-imagined..some well, some pointless, some plain wrong!
imaginary-two5 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I have read many other reviews and find points of many that I agree with and others I disagree with, to wit... I saw other mention of the bullets issue, and I agree, a civilization, and technology, with Faster Than Light drives, and seamless artificial gravity would NOT use guns that not only fired bullets, but were obvious current day handguns. The Cylon Fighters (Raiders), I can even accept the redesign of the Cylon Fighters, as if they got rid of the crew area, and put the Cylon face on them to signify the fact that the ship IS the Cylon, kinda makes sense, even, and they are not too different than the originals in motor and weapon placement and overall shape (minus the crew area). The Cylon Base Stars, what, was a order given that they cannot look ANYTHING like the originals?, the 5 sided round double angular saucer of the originals is not that boring, terrible, or unimaginative of a ship design! They could have enhanced that design, like they did all the other ships (kinda), the new double three sided star looking Base Stars have not even a hint of the originals, but the interiors, with their "Alien" organic look is nice. Speaking of the Galactica, and the recent Pegasus, I can accept them in a similar manner as a refitted WW II aircraft carrier or battleship. But, does the non networking philosophy of the new Galactica (which again actually makes some sense, and tries to explain the corded handsets) extend to the doors?, is it somehow illegal to have any that slide? I guess again a FTL technology can't make compact slider motors hid in walls, or is Ron just making sure you don't mistake this for Trek, or even Babylon 5?

The Cylons , or most of them, the human looking ones, I see as rather a cop out, ST:TNG had "The Borg" and now this, one might begin to think that Ron is just scared of, or incapable of, making truly alien looking aliens, or robots? The re-imagined CG Cylons are cool looking, but what of them have we seen, maybe a total of 10 mins. of screen time? Will they ever talk?, even if the original Cylon Centurions sounded rather like a cheap "Darth Vader", or a 1980s vintage Chrysler Lebaron that featured a canned on a chip synth voice, they at least could talk! More importantly, will these new CG Cylons ever be portrayed as anything other than short screen shots with no real personality, or purpose, other than to shoot their bullet firing guns?

Now for the acting, I think Edward James Olmos is great, I loved the few Miami Vice episodes he was showcased in and his Blade Runner performance, his trademark hard line seriousness is a better Adama than Lorne Greene ever was, sorry. I could never stop thinking of Greene as Ben Cartright, I kept waiting for him to get on a horse! I also like Mary McDonnell as President Laura Roslin, and I don't remember seeing her as anything other than the small part of the president's wife in Independence Day, and was unimpressed with that, so I don't have a bias for her. James Callis is good as Baltar, and although I think the original Baltar (John Colicos) was a much better villain and more interesting character, I have grown to like the re-imagined Baltar, and his subplot. I thought, BTW, that Callis was just silly in ST:DSN. The new Col. Tigh is interesting as well, but I again liked the original Tigh better (and I must say I think the only reason Tigh is not black is because they are too politically correct to have a drunk black) the rest, well, the others I consider interchangeable with 100s of other so-so actors in B-grade TV shows, and the Cylon/Human Number Six (Tricia Helfer) is a obvious name rip off of Seven of Nine in ST:V, and the character is just a bimbo whore, but one who happens to support the (Cylons looking for God? Cylons wanna have a baby?) subplot connected to Baltar. I also think the feminization of Boomer and Starbuck is pointless, except as maybe another politically correct move. I liked all the original pilots better. Speaking of old pilots, I am glad they gave SOMETHING to Richard Hatch (Apollo in the original, Tom Zarek in the re-imagining), after his hard work and even mortgaging his house to make the pilot for his idea of a continuation of BSG, he certainly deserves something, more even, like do his vision, maybe? One other character I must comment on, Admiral Cain, (Michelle Forbes) is very different than the original's Commander Cain (Lloyd Bridges) of the Pegasus, but I like her performance, at least on Jan. 5th, before I see part 2 tomorrow, I also liked her as Lt. Ro on ST:TNG and she plays a similar role, a believable strong female, so her "persona" has continuity, and I like that.(Yea, sure, call me the type cast loving kook!)

I could go on, but I will end with this, I LOVE some elements of the re-imagined Galactica, and I find other parts VERY distasteful, and for me it's very much a Love/Hate attitude I have about the show, but I have grown to kinda like the show, and will continue to watch it. It has drama, the camera work I happen to like, some of the actors are very good, it has interesting plot twists and questions yet to be answered. So for now I'll overlook the distasteful elements.

And of course I loved the original, and really wish that a character like the "IL Series" Cylon Lucifer (voiced by Jonathan Harris, "Lost in Space's" Dr. Smith) was included, and hope (I'm sure quite pointlessly) that a episode similar to the original's "The War of the Gods" would be made in future
614 out of 997 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best SF Series ever
rhob19601 October 2009
When I heard that the Science Fiction Channel (I refuse to acknowledge their new name), I was less than thrilled. The original series was, to put it bluntly, crap. They took a great idea, the near genocide of a species and let it rot. Rather than keeping it within the boundaries they set, Glen Larson and company made it basically, the fugitive in space. I won't go into how there was no science in this at all, no jump engines, no warp, no FTL of any kind. Of how they knew nothing about any astronomy, or the stupid measurements that meant nothing. The writing was horrible, many episodes were just rip offs of movies, the acting barely tolerable. So I was less than thrilled. However, when I heard that Ron Moore, one of the geniuses behind Deep Space Nine, the best of all the Star Trek spin-offs, was doing it. I was interested. Then, when I saw the miniseries, I was hooked. Galactica is a brilliant show that brought humanity back to Science Fiction. As the show went on and more and more plot threads were revealed, the show was shown to be complex, the kind of TV that's been lacking and can only be held up with excellent shows like Dexter and Breaking Bad. Brilliant in every aspect, Galactica is the kind of show that cannot be understood in one viewing, it has to be watched again and again. Galactica led the way for a resurgence of intelligent Science Fiction, with shows like Fringe and Flash Forward following it's example. Four seasons was for some, too short, but for me a perfect length. I eagerly await THE PLAN.
130 out of 211 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
You decide
marcogeracao-9170419 March 2019
I was immediately hooked after the pilot, it was that simple. I am a scifi fanatic but, as I grew up, I started demanding more complex movies and series beyond that flimsy scifi rhetoric and technobabble. BSG has it all and keeps it for 4 seasons. In fact, I'm yet to see something even close to BSG quality on TV.

People will try to find weaknesses and point out plot holes. They usually end up begging questions again and again or giving opinions about how it should have been made. Come on... that's laughable to say the least. It's all fallacious talk.

But please, I dare you, watch the pilot and tell me you had the guts to not keep watching the show.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Loved it! Updated for our time!
evewhitaker-2856122 June 2019
Better graphics, updated clothing and most of off better explained although still leaving enough to the imagination!
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Some of the best TV ever
Thirdover48 June 2006
I was a fan of the original and a fan of science fiction, but more so I am a fan of great cinematic television. This show went beyond my wildest dreams. Some people have a hard time with certain dramatic and artistic choices made by the producers, but to me those choices only make the show stronger and gutsier. The new Battlestar Galactica concentrates on characters, drama, and the human condition and shies away from the fantasy, serial elements of the original and others of the genre. A first rate cast with real acting chops help ground the story and characters in a universe where the audience cares what happens to them. This is the antithesis of the original that relied on caricature villains and cartoon story lines. The new show tackles real life issues about human rights, religion, and the moral ambiguity of war. It's no wonder Battlestar Galactica has garnered glowing reviews from Time Magazine, Rolling Stone, TV Guide, and the American Film Institute.
198 out of 349 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Best
joslys0126 January 2019
This series took the basic premise of the original 1-2 season show and expanded it. And what a job they DID! This is the best show by far that came out that year. Capt. Adama is played by Edward James Olmos differently than the late, great Lorne Green. He does an EXCELLENT job. As does James Callis as Baltar, and it was bold to cast Starbuck as a woman. She was great in the role. The whole cast was, in fact, very good. The story got a little confusing as the Cylons' motives were revealed and it seemed like the ending (of the show) was rushed. It was unconvincing but otherwise the acting was top notch. The thing was that despite the sci-fi nature of the show, it was really a very good drama.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Just a wonderful series
eightman-0678812 August 2019
If you are a sci-fi fan, it a must watch. The writing and casting is fantastic. Great ensemble, great plot.
25 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Remains unbeaten, even after more than a decade
jantsas20 March 2021
I saw the whole BS-series shortly after its appearance in 2005-2009 and was baffled by its strong plot, superb acting, realistic character building, thematic engagement, overall maturity, sense of nuance and philosophical depth. Now, some ten years later, I enjoyed watching it again from start to finish. BS has lost none of those qualities and attraction. BS set a new standard for scifi series and remains unbeaten (unfortunately).
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Iconic, underrated, classic - MUST WATCH
gothica-3024121 January 2020
I watch this series from start to finish at least twice a year. There has never and probably will never be a show which does right what this show does.

The characters are perfect, especially the female characters - anyone writing female characters should watch this. See how the men and women don't behave so differently, it's like they wrote lots of different characters without gender and later cast people to play them. These characters could be any gender and it would work just as well.

All the actors are perfect. Sure the CGI of the cylons is dated, but it doesn't take from the show. The space CGI still stands up very well in 2020.

This show should not be so unknown, it's criminal! Amazing show, not sure why it wasn't more of a hit - wrong era? poor marketing? poor scheduling?
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A show of two halves
grantss18 December 2023
The Cylons, androids, have risen up against their human creators, the people of the Twelve Colonies of Cobol, with the intention of wiping out the human race. After a surprise attack they nearly succeed in this aim. Only about 50,000 humans remain, gathered in a rag-tag fleet. At the centre of this fleet is the only surviving colonial warship, the battlestar Galactica.

One of my favourite TV programs as a kid was the original Battlestar Galactica so when this remake came out I figured it couldn't possibly surpass, or even equal, the original so avoided watching it. Until now.

The 2-part intro mini-series is excellent and immediately got me hooked on the series. This series initially starts in a similar vein, taking the main plot of the original and throwing in some great sub-plots, giving depth to all the characters, tightening the plot development and generally making things grittier and more credible.

Action scenes are great too, as are the special effects.

The question for me was how are the writers are going to sustain the intrigue and for four seasons and 74 episodes. There is a definite end point to the series and it would be difficult to break down the path to that point into 74 pieces - it would get quite repetitive.

This is solved initially by having little in the way of grand plot development but having episode-long adventures and sub-plots, almost independent of each other. This makes for some interesting detours.

However, more than halfway through Season 2, the grand plot became the focus and it felt that the series had at last found a centre. This was made even better by an unexpected twist towards the end of Season 2, promising to take the series in a different, yet still very interesting, direction.

Unfortunately, this direction is short-lived and what follows is quite different to the first two seasons, and not pleasantly so. We have twists for twists' sake, changes of characters for the worse, plot developments that seem contrived and inconsistent, mind-bendy nonsense and quite a lot of filler. The change is so drastic that either the show changed its writers or the existing writers started using harder drugs.

Every now and again there is a great episode that pulls the show back on course but this makes things worse, as you think the worst is over but it's only a false dawn.

By the end of Season 3 I had lost track of all the silly sub-plots going on and hardly liked any of the characters anymore, leaving me unengaged. Watching Season 4 was thus a chore.

A pity that it ended so weakly as it seemed headed for greatness at one stage.

Season ratings: S1&2 8/10, S3&4 6.5.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
So few characters to like and poor writing make for a disappointing watch
tomlebeuf4 May 2020
There is a mini-series, which leads into 4 seasons of BG.

I liked the premise of the story but the writing fails so miserably that you end up so many times lust saying "What?"

Far too many times characters flip-flop unrealistically in their behavior it's like they are all schizo and makes it obvious it was just to drive whatever storyline of that episode they were emphasizing. Baltar being easily the worst of them. (And why he cries basically every single episode he is in is beyond me) Starbuck is extremely unlikable as well and at several points there were multiple characters I was just hoping got killed off

The only character I liked for the entirety is Helo because he remains consistent in the way he conducts himself.

I don't want to give anything away, but their use of time is lame, as there is one period of time that the most amount of messed up stuff happens (apparently anyway) that is only covered in maybe 3 episodes.

The special effects are passable for a tv show but the writing is so bad and results in completely inconsistent behaviours from the characters not-subtle-at-all religious overtones just make the overall experience unsatisfying.

Go watch "The Expanse" if you want a more enjoyable sci-fi show.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed