Kaal (2005) Poster

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
56 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Exciting story about a killer tiger
ijzeren_jan18 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Krish, a biologist from National Geographic, is sent out to investigate the case of a killer tiger haunting the Indian jungle. On his way, he joins a group of youngsters who are out for adventure and some hunting. Deep in the jungle, they meet the mysterious Kali, who warns them to go back. Of course, they refuse, and the more they get lost, the more the plot thickens. For a horror flick from Bollywood, Kaal is not a bad movie at all. It is, in any case, way beyond the monsters-with-faces-like-pizzas kind of horror that used to dominate Bollywood in the 1980s and 1990s, and unlike horror flicks of the "who's next?" type, it keeps you focused from the beginning till the end, and at times really manages to surprise. Sure, there are things we always know in advance: if there are a few better known actors and a few unknown, we all know who is going to be eaten first. But that's a minor thing.

Before watching Kaal, all I knew was that it was some sort of Indian "Jaws" with a tiger instead of a shark. And I am grateful for that, because otherwise the appearance of Kali, a mysterious inhabitant of the jungle, might have evoked the wrong kind of expectations. I for one found myself utterly surprised when he turned out to be the "bhoot", the ghost he had been telling about, himself. A fascinating character! What I like best about him is the fact that he never hurts anybody, on the contrary, he keeps warning everybody. Nobody dies because of Kali or a tiger. All those who die, die merely because of their own stupidity. They should have listened to Kali.

The film has another huge asset: the excellent background score by the duo Salim-Sulaiman. That said, there are a few decisive minuses as well. First of all, the movie begins with a completely idiotic video clip featuring Shahrukh Khan in a wet shirt, which has nothing in common with the movie whatsoever. They might as well have filled the same space with a commercial, or, for that matter, with a black screen. Another weak point are the characters. Ajay Devgan does an excellent job as Kali, but the script fails to work out any of the other characters. Even calling them flat or cardboard would be too much, because frankly, there's no character in them at all. Vivek Oberoi manages best, but John Abraham fails to impress and especially the women (Lara Dutta and Esha Deol) serve no other purpose than being pretty and constantly afraid. This poor characterisation has a major disadvantage: you can't identify with the characters and never really care if someone dies or not. But all in all, the exciting plot makes up for this weakness. It didn't stop me at all from enjoying "Kaal".
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nice movie, especially because of SRK's item song.
arsh77777778 August 2009
I watched the promos. I didn't really pay much attention to the promos. The first screening and boom, so many videos on youtube. The one of SRK's item song really got me to go and watch the film. I sat through the first 20 - 30 minutes...bored. Then it picks up. The ending is very ironic. This movie is very hyping. My ratings for this movie are 1) Story - 9/10; 2) Direction - 7/10 (The Weaker point); 3) Performances - 8/10; 4) Character Development - 8/10; 5) Overall - 8/10. In my point of view, this movie is nice. If you're not such a big fan of thrillers, then this is not for you to watch because it is...well... it's a thriller.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Watching National Geographic is better
ssvikas2 May 2005
Plot Outline: Tourists Dev (Vivek Oberoi), Ishika (Lara Dutta) and two friends explore Orbit National Park, a tiger haven. They meet Wildlife experts Krish (John Abraham) and Riya (Esha Deol) who are exploring recent mysterious man-eater killings for National Geographic Channel. They are joined by Kali (Ajay Devgan) who takes up the challenge of guiding them though the mysteries of the jungle.

Comment: Kaal is pot-pourri of Ram Gopal Verma and Karan Johar's styles since Writer/Director Soham had been an assistant to both. RGV's style is visible in the thriller plot, pale ghosts and bizarre deaths. Johar didn't forget to cast SRK, this time in an Item number. The movie shares similarities with Ghost and the Darkness, Wrong Turn, etc.

There isn't much acting to see, thanks to the incoherent script and lack of room for characters to grow. Music is decent; choreography is stereotype. Jim Corbett National Park is well captured. No wonder they are facing a suit for the alleged violation of the Wildlife act.

Rating: 2/5
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
'Crouching Tiger, Hiding Viewer'
abhishek-129 April 2005
'Crouching Tiger, Hiding Viewer!'

Kaal Dir- Soham Cast- Vivek Oberoi, John Abraham, Lara Dutta, Esha Deol, Vishal Malhotra, Vineet Sharma and Ajay Devgan. Written by- Soham Rating- *

Man-eating tigers are the least horrifying aspect of 'Kaal'- Karan Johar's Dharma Productions and Shahrukh Khan's Red Chillies Entertainment's valiant march into Varma's world! There's a much more dangerous threat lurking in the reels of this debacle! It appears as if the whole cast is infected with a virus that induces horrendously low levels of acting! In what must be a brilliant achievement- Soham has managed to extract impossibly bad performances not only from 'specialists at bad acting' like Esha Deol and Lara Dutta, but even from the talented Vivek Oberoi and the highly gifted Ajay Devgan.

That leaves us with John Abraham. Don't worry, he's pathetic too! We are first introduced to his toned abdomen while he is running and then, shown him serenading with a python! Some gay fantasy, this! Thankfully, we are also informed that he works with the National Geographic and has a wife, Riya(Esha Deol). Krish(Johnny boy!) and Riya head off to the jungle of Orbit Park to investigate an increasing number of suspicious killings, apparently by tigers. Jungle mein mangal? Orbit(Corbett rechristened?!?) Park incidentally boasts the largest number of tigers in India. Also on their way to this tigerland are a group of city-bred animals- Dev(Vivek Oberoi), Ishika(Lara Dutta), Vishal(Vishal Malhotra) and Sajid(Kushal Punjabi). A car-breakdown and a 'mrityunjaya mantra' reciting weirdo(Vineet Sharma) later, our animals encounter the python-lover and his lover! A few more reels and a few more killings! Enter Kali Pratap Singh(Ajay Devgan), a mysterious villager who offers to help them get out of the jungle. All things aside, Ajay Devgan's entrance is a crackling scene that actually gives one the goose bumps, unlike the creepy scenes which were meant to…but never do! The time by which this bunch runs away from the jungle, a few more surprises are revealed. A good student of cinema will see the twist coming a long way before it actually does. And while that takes away from the thrill of the revelation, what hurts more is the script's sudden jumping of genres. A bad case of identity crisis- the script is unsure whether it is a thriller or a horror! So while the movie promises you a wild thriller in the first half, it resorts to the supernatural in the latter half!

The screenplay moves at a turgid pace with no significant episode in the first three-quarters of an hour. Desperate attempts at making the audiences jump from their seats result in loud guffaws. Sample this- we are led to believe that an anonymous hand is about to cause some terror to a character only to be revealed that the hand in question is the character's own! Hands down, the most stupid scene! Also stupid is Lara Dutta exercising her vocal chords in a role that she has screamed her way through! Vivek Oberoi makes more facial contortions than a constipated man while Esha Deol redefines poor acting and looks like she's straight out of a lingerie ad for a tiger-skin brassiere! The usually dependable Ajay Devgan is made to mouth lines that are far below his acting quotient. The only decent act comes from Vineet Kumar as Bagga. The sound by Dwarak Warrier is brilliant but overused to a nauseating effect.

In a nutshell, Dharma is no Varma! All the monkey-screeches, tiger-roars, owl-howls and Lara-screams add up to one excruciating visit to the cinema hall! A toddler behind me kept insisting his father to leave the theater and go home. Actually, he was voicing the sentiments of all present!

  • Abhishek Bandekar


Rating- *

* Poor ** Average *** Good **** Very Good ***** Excellent

29th April, 2005
24 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A super time waster
phaneendrakumar30 April 2005
Kaal was supposed to be the best film of the year before its release. But, as usual bollywood has produced yet another Hollywood style (read copy) time waster. The macho men like Ajay Devagan and Vivek Oberoi also could not save the disaster.

Some sequences clearly are copied from "Final Destination" and Taran Adarsh of Indiafm says these scenes are the best. I seriously don't understand how come he became a film critic. Tasteless cheap idiot.

The promos gave much hype to the movie with tigers and all the stuff. Clearly Soham concentrated more on the promos than the original film. Esha and Lara prove to be a waste. To be frank I don't find a single positive point about the movie except the marketing and pre release promotion.

My advice is not to watch the movie and waste your money.

Rating **.
25 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Back to the same Bollywood Mantra
blade_bugs28 May 2005
I had seen this film yesterday, considering it to be a Karan Johar & Shahrukh Khan Production, expected much more than the crap that I just saw.

The Acting was very poor, plots that were undefined & unexpected, background music that was terrible & reallyyyyyyy nothing scary. It was just a popcorn ride.

The film could have been much, much, better than what was imagined & directed by Soham. The plot changed from one part to another & then what do you recognize at the end, it is the same old Indian Masala.

Most of the Scenes were copied from Hollywood films which by surprise should not happen under a Huge banner.

Well at the end, just would like to say that it was waste of time & money.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good one for some adventure lover
chetanrajsingh-980792 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This Movie conveys a message that death is uncertain. You never know when you meet it. Story line is OK and the location is also pretty good . It is more of an adventure type rather than Horror. Overall Movie is Good but not that Outstanding
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Disaster!
When you have a reputable banner, Dharma Productions, BIG stars-Shah Rukh Khan and Karan Johar, and a fantastic publicity campaign backing a film, you KNOW the movie will make money. The fantastic start that KAAL has got at the box office is obviously, no surprise. But, the movie, dear Dharma productions, is sad, bad and very boring.

The movie is about John Abraham, a tiger expert working for National Geographic, his photographer wife, Esha Deol who goto Orbit Park to unearth the secrets of man-eating tigers. Surprisingly, this happens without any information to the channel, and they just land up there and try explore. The story then brings in Vivek Oberoi, Lara Dutta and their two friends, all of whom are on vacation, and as their car breaks down, a sudden turn of events lands them at Orbit Park, and after they meet Abraham and Deol, the story moves on. They meet the tigers and Ajay Devgan later, and soon tragedies happen around them, and I wouldn't spoil that for anyone who'd want to see this ridiculous excuse of a movie, which has no narrative and pace.

Soham tries to make his audience THINK. Like Oberoi lighting the cigarette and Abraham making that scary face. Obviously, the audience add two and two and make i four, but Mr. Soham is no Hitchcock. Dude, when you throw in something confusing at least offer an explanation for it. THAT's what makes the movie interesting and adds repeat value. Remember when Kevin Spacey says "the greatest trick the devil ever pulled off was to convince the world that he did not exist" or when Haley Joel Osement says "I see dead people around...the big problem is they themselves do not know they're dead"...well, it all had a meaning! Oberoi saying "smoking kills" and then smoking, eeesh! Care to explain? There are a gazillion more loop holes! A lot of people have spoken about the 'mixed reactions' the movie as got. Heck, the movie has got bad reviews everywhere, except for from Mr. Taran Adarsh, leading trade analyst. And that makes me think, why and how. Quite simply, he is obsessed with everything Karan Johar and ShahRukh Khan do. And he has no qualms about it either. He'd even rate admittedly bad things from the Khan-Johar camp and make them sound good. So, when such a reputed analyst rates the film so highly, most of the audiences are given further incentive to go watch the film.

I remember when DHOOM released, Mr. Adarsh very categorically said that "after the initial hype, this movie will die down". Taran, DHOOM was still an entertainer. KAAL, to which you give 4 stars out of 5, is dull. You may love Johar and SRK, but call a spade a spade man! I'd give this movie a */***** and that too for the brilliant sound, and the very first item number on SRK and the hot hot Malaika. The movie is downhill from there. Of course, SRK and Johar would go laughing to the bank, but guys, please don't torture us like this anymore.
18 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The worst NAT GEO feature is much much better than this trash...
atlastorm11 May 2005
Pride is what caused Kaal. I could somehow feel Karan Johar in each and every shot, and the forced acting, the worst use of the wide angle, funny jungle sounds you could buy on a cheap CD, and of course, Shah Rukh Khan and Mallaika. For a moment it seemed more like a Pepsi Commercial, and a badly directed one at that. Strangers meet in jungle, hacked one by one, until they come upon the big secret, something that you'll guess anyway within the first fifteen minutes of the movie. the only person it might fool is someone sleeping through the movie. The Director must have really begged to get this chance, and Karan Johar must have been desperately bored. Some claim this film is a hit. Of course it will be. That's why Shah Rukh appears at the beginning, to tell us: "it's all right! this kind of crap is endorsed by me, see?" The movie is an insult to the paying-public. Of course, only a Karan Johar can get away with such blatant disrespect, with his already immoral films setting the trends for today's youngsters. while aditya chopra strives for morals, karan johar exploits the lack of it. True, he does vibe well with the public. But for how long?
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent & Good Watch..
shaikhirshad-412236 June 2022
Well this movie is not like the typical Bollywood horror movie. It has its different tone. Screenplay is good. But lacks story and the climax can easily be predicted. Good cast but the acting has little surprised me because all are overreacting except Ajay Devgn. Ajay Devgn was superb in the movie and fit to play the character that he plays. Otherwise just decent watch you can give it a try. It's not that horror but it's a good thriller.....
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
All Hype
adi66767 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
You know how you end up going to the movies because the star cast was intriguing, and then you walk out of the theatre wondering why you were led on by your pathetic intuition that the star cast might make the movie a real hit? This is one of them. Cept, i only went because of misleading information that the movie was great. Horrible. Names like "Shahrukh", "Karan Johar", "Malaika" were simply used to lure in the crowd... for a complete disappointment.

The movie is not scary in the least bit. It relies on the sudden increase in volume of screaming monkeys, birds, bananas, and what-have-you. Fear Factor? Yeah right...

Overall, a badly compiled movie with scenes from "Final Destination" (the eerie method by which people get knocked off the stupid script), "The Ring" (the dilapidated well), "The Ghost and The Darkness" (the malnutritioned tigers)... the list could go on, but i was busy yawning, and joining other people's conversation during the movie.

I wont stop you from going to the movie. But i would definitely like to point out that it's better off rented, that too when you want a complete "time-pass" movie.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A nice and hot Bollywood horror flick with great songs!
Sherazade11 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I liked this film, you have to watch it, understand it, and digest it before you judge it. The premise is quite old but nevertheless refreshing when told in this very Bollywood way. A bunch of friends set out for a summer adventure of a lifetime, and boy do they get it! At least the ones that survive that is. The stunning stellar cast of Vivek Oberoi, John Abraham, Lara Dutta, Esha Deol and Ajay Devgan set your eyes into hyperactive motion as the plot begins to unravel. Esha and John are a married couple who work for National Geographic and are sent to India's wildlife reservation to conduct an investigation into stories of man-eating tigers. Along the way, they bump into a pack of college kids who include Oberoi and Dutta who also are a couple. I also need to point out the opening song and dance number which shows off a cameo by the King Khan himself, Shah Rukh (he produced the film) burning up the screen with a hot new look and gyrating his hips alongside MAK to the sexy urban number entitled 'Kaal' (the song is hot, that's all you need to know at this point) a total must see! No other songs occur during the film, as it is a serious one. But make sure you catch 'Tauba, Tauba' and 'Naza Naza' with a sizzling performance by the two couples after the film. Sexy Yaar!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Great Story Gone Awry
jaykumar1141 May 2005
Shahrukh Khan & Karan Johar's KAAL is an apt example of Cinema gone Wrong in a big way.......Since there were LOt of References to make from .....The Ghost & The Darkness, The Wrong Turn, Blair witch Project & of the like......The film should not have gone wrong.....but the crappy twist & the faulty screenplay takes away the charm that Actors(Mainly: Ajay Devgan & John Abraham) & the Technical Team(Santosh Thundiyil....Take A Bow....)packs it....Soham is a Good Craftsman...But not a Fine Story-teller...he should not have wasted the great production on such a inept story....Maybe he can tell a apt story next time ..... ..... Overall Expectation Ruined......

Good story Turned Faulty......
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Great Way to kill ur TIME (kaal)
anurag2k1-imdb1 May 2005
(MIS) Cast - John Abraham, Esha Deol, Vivek oberoi, Lara Dutta, Ajay devgan, Kushal Punjabi and Pameet Sethi, The movie is all about why it is happening at the ORBIT National Park, (Jim Corbet Netional Park, Uttranchal , India (RENAMED)). Any ways what was so strange there. Some mysterious killings. but as it is well known (rumored) that it is being done by a MANEATNG tigers group!!!!!!! And guess who is going there to find out what is behind the scene, (A photographer from National Geographic channel)John Abraham,- Can some body answer where are Indian FOREST OFFICERS, (ON LEAVE/or every one left the "Orbit " National Park, because they know a natgeo photographer will be here to find this out)-. was there with his Wife (Esha Deol).

and then there was Vivek Oberoi and party, vivek with his Girl Friend Lara Dutta and Kushal Punjabi plus Vihsal , (Point to be noted ) they met in a way that Vivek Oberoi's (Re Technitioned)LAND CRUISER and NAT GEO's TATA SAFARI or Mahindra SCOPIO (or something like that) both broke down and they got lift from a man diving Maruti Gypsi (moral of the story Land Crusier is not meant for Safari Ride ). Interesting.

after that three or four accidents while safari. Sound Defects (i repeat defects) -a Match stick flame felt like a blast - what will u call it EFFECT!!!!!!! oh enough of sound effects thing, where is Ajay Devgan, so here he is just before Intermission to save the life of our worthy heroic group, (mylord point to be noted Vishal was filming the scene on his SONY handy cam) .

after some two or three mysterious killing they found the real Culprit and they escape from jungle for the sake of life because they can not kill any body who is all ready dead.

They got the secret and escaped . And the most hilarious part of the movie ---> a NATGEO photographers generates his task report and wrote it as "all is done by a bhoot(GHOST) and not by the MANEATING TIGER!!!!!!!!", who is the Ghost???? - sorry sir i am not supposed to destroy a movies business for this u have to watch the movie. Better wait for VCD/DVD and rent it, because the movie is not a worth keeping

what is done by actors -- nothing!!! Lara, John and Ajay were quite talented from my point of view, before i had seen the movie. Vivek and Esha are again a not to talk about thing.

and this movie seems to be a long advertisement of SONY and NATGEO. the movie starts from a great count of media and official partners.No awards on counting them, yet been declared by Dharma productions and Red Chillies.

Do watch it if u want to kill u KAAL(TIME). Guys this is not KAAL this is AKAAL of one good Bollywood thriller.

2 out of ten.
9 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not worth the time and money.
ajithat4 May 2005
Pros and Cons of Kaal

Pros: 1. Title Song 2. some very few chilling scenes 3. Dwarak Warrier has some good sound effects

Cons: 1. A supernatural story in the guise of a realistic entertainer. ('Darna Mana Hai' was a much better movie.) 2. Bad Cinematography. Immature use of wide angle shots. 3. Editing is too fast-cut; especially when it comes to showing dead bodies or tiger attacks 4. National Geographic has done a blunder in associating itself with such a storyline. 5. Too many logical mistakes 6. Immature Direction; Soham should have resisted the temptation to use cheap tricks to induce horror. Soham, next time, do a sanity check on the scenes after you shoot them. 7. Jarring background score 8. Bad acting 9. Does not really promote any awareness on tiger conservation or wildlife preservation. 10. Tigers look as if they are on a circus ramp. Don't forget to watch their 'catwalk' during the Ajay Devgan introduction scene.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
High on hype,low on material
sheraz_alam_khan5 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a bit different than what you expect from Hindi cinema.cast was a big factor for audience. Promo songs "Kaal Dhmaal" especially was good.Promos were very catchy.Red CHillies (Sharuk khan) and Karan Johar were the producers and Director Soham Has been Asst. of Ram Gopal Verma and Karan Johar.but unfortunately,After the high hype created my promos and web reviews, i expected a nice excited supernatural thriller.....yes supernatural it was but no way near being nice and exciting.first of all the story and direction let me down. The first scene of John with an ANACONDA....lolz. He was running with him on the ground and able to catch it and when the phone rang....he simply dropped it....i really don't know what the director wanted the audience to see.Director tried to make us curious by the characterisation of Vivek Oberoi and there were no explanation of his attitude in the movie....lots of characters in the movie without any significance.....Introduction of Ajay Devgan and his dialogue were good at times....but ,most of the time story is predictable. Overall, a letdown.YET ANOTHER FLOP BY RED CHILLIES ENTERTAINMENT
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Killer fluffy bunnies???
hal-farsed30 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I would have thought that rather than trying to save the tigers (which seemed to be abundant and well able to look after themselves), the efforts would be better spent trying to save the cute fluffy bunnies running wild in the park. Or was it subliminal advertising for Lijjat Papad? Karram Kurram!

And I would have thought that ANYONE who had seen the results of Havildar Ajay Devgan's leadership in Tango Charlie would think twice and run screaming before they agreed to let themselves be led by this man to safety - oops! Sorry, nearly everyone is dead!

Although he did try to warn them - don't go near the well.....and did they take his advice, no of course not!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A Jungle Horror
Herag27 May 2005
This is an ill-conceived, ill-written and ill-directed movie. The infrared shots of the jungle with background sound of crickets does't evoke any admiration for the grossly immature direction. Then there is the venerable Ajay Devgan as "Kali (Kali Prathap Singh to be precise-to let the viewers know that this reviewer has seen this film), walking out of the woods like Moses, with a bamboo pole (with Manish Malhotra not far behind!)-three tigers walk away with the tail between their legs! truly a jungle Film, there is even magic here. I can't believe a reputable banner like Dharma Productions would be remotely associated with this junk, However I can fully believe someone like Sharukh Khan would be behind this venture, since Junk Films are right up his alley.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Criminally underrated movie
parworld200323 December 2018
Some seriously poor acting tanked the movie ratings in a strong storyline.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
painful movie
ss287913 May 2005
the movie doesn't contain any plot or substance. there are two item number routines, one to start the movie off, and another to end it off.

other than these, there is nothing much interesting in the movie.

the two actresses try to display as much flesh as possible, which is a little confusing, considering that the whole movie is shot in the middle of a jungle. one must admit that the director has utilized the resources at his disposal in this department well.

the tigers don't appear long enough in the script. when they do its quite an artificial scene. hardly something that makes one tremble with fear.

biggest issue is the disconnect between the pitching of the movie through its two songs, while the movie has nothing to do with them.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
kaal - no dhammal
rajeshk2 May 2005
Kaal – it's all about living up to your promise.

Yes, Kaal promised much. A songless thriller from The Karan Johar stable! Set in Jim Corbett, an array of dazzling stars, an item number from the Chaiyya Chaiyya pair and a man eater tiger to moot. And super cool promos which got most of us excited.

But alas, kaal is all about a great promo and an ordinary product. It pretty much falls in the slasher fest genre which studiously sticks to the following rules

1.Loud is scary. Yes, every scene is recorded with high pitched sound and screechy noises! Sure there could be a better way of scaring people. 2.The hero's best friends are the first to be killed. Here the character Vishal, dies twice in five minutes, if once was not bad enough. 3.Point the needle of suspicion on the main characters and get them into a scuffle. We do not even get to see John and Vivek fight. The way their girl friends, get them to back off has to be seen to be believed. 4.Have one scary dream sequence in the middle of nowhere, and expect the audience to wake up after that! 5.Headless corpses are a must; throw a couple of them for good effect.

But, hey this movie is set in Jim Corbett (read Orbit Park) and we need to talk about tiger conservation. Remember we have a marketing tie up with Nat Geo. Sure show a hanging owl and langoor dangling from a tree every twenty minutes and a python wrapped around John's torso (strong suspicion that Karan insisted on this shot). And John is after all a "Tiger expert" working with Nat Geo.

The acting skills in a slasher fest are strictly limited to the women shrieking, screaming, running and obviously dressed in skimpy clothes (remember no songs for such displays). And the men , Vivek Oberoi has perfected the art of being Mr. Irritating (with kajal and lipstick make up !) and considering his acting skills are rather limited , one can be rest assured his real life persona is not way different ( now do we blame Sallu for wanting to bash him up). Devgan who has a psychobabble mumbo jumbo background score blaring as he enters, has a staff to cover his face and his intense brooding eyes hope to add to the terror. John looks good and it's a little too much to expect him to act.

Yes, Kaal is all this and more! Do watch it, you would never complain about why Karan Johar makes the same kind of KKHH, KHNH, K3G movies. He should leave this genre to the Ramus of the world and not to forget the director of this venture is Soham Ali (he was assistant to both Ramu and Karan prior to this). One piece of advise to Soham, stick to assisting, it's not such a bad thing.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
spend 2 hrs. of your life on something more useful
kittoo420200425 August 2005
Amazed by the promos,I happily took the risk of putting my studies apart and watched the movie.And it is necessary to say-I WASTED MY TIME.Truly,a ridiculous movie,with no aim,no theme and no direction(of course we can say this).I was thinking in the whole movie that when the movie will begin?That's true,there was no beginning in the movie.Just a fool effort of horrifying the viewer.And the reason behind all these murders-the ghost,My GOD,how one can write such a boring story.And the ending of the movie was the worst one I ever saw.The only plus point of the movie was it's background score.Salim-Sulaiman done their job quite nicely.The part of the forest officer was forcefully send to the doubt list.With so many flaws,the movie only puts the fame of Johar camp down.DON'T WATCH IT,EVEN AT FREE OF COST,USE TWO HOURS OF YOUR LIFE FOR SOMETHING USEFUL.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Read this only if you have seen this movie
kapilash16 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Well! This is not your usual IMDb comment on this master-piece(of sh!t). This comment is here strictly for philanthropic purposes. You should read this comment AFTER you have seen Kaal.

OKay. You must be thinking that you have seen the worst movie since the big bang ( or the ice-age, if , by nature, you are kind and forgiving ). Well.. I am here to give you a new interpretation to the movie and make you feel a li'l less cheated. Firstly, don't think that this movie belongs to the horror genre. Secondly you should not think that that Kaali was a killer was meant to be a surprise. Thirdly and most importantly, you should not even think that he is a bhoot. Kaali is not a bhoot. He is just a madman who talks about himself in the third person. And he thinks he died. When Villagers beat him black and blue, they did not kill him. He survived. But he lost his senses and started believing that he died. And all the deaths we see in the movie are those that are accidents or murders. The surviving characters think of him as a bhoot. They do that based on some silly evidence. They cant find his image - either in the well or in the video camera. Well, vivek oberai could not see the image in the well because the angle was not correct. And of course Kaali could not be seen in the camera - That was expected. After all, the conditions under which the camera was used were not exactly conducive for perfect composition of film.

Thus, You should look at Kaali as a madman who is mistaken to be bhoot by the rest of the characters. If you have seen Citizen Kane, you would see some parallels here with the "rosebud". If you can see this way, you will understand that Kaal is not the poor man's "Urban Legend" as it is made out to be, but it is an amateur director's attempt at Citizen Kane. Now some advice: Next time you think of going to a movie in which a male actor is doing an 'item number', think again. May be it'd be more enjoyable to get struck in a traffic jam on a hot summer afternoon in an Indian City.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A horrible movie from Dharma Productions!
jambawala6 November 2005
Well, I just finished watching, correction, suffering through the movie and I felt I HAD to express my views somehow. Then I went through the other comments on this movie and realized most of them expressed those same views anyway. Yes, it's true, like everyone else has said, it's a huge waste of time, it's a worthless movie with no substance, and Soham should not be given any creative control ever again.

There are two things I am amazed with... I mean the movie was really bad, I can accept that without much surprise, it is almost expected to happen in Bollywood when we're dealing with anything outside the romantic drama genre. But this flick received Karan Johar's support! What was he thinking?! The movie was not entertaining in the least, from start to finish, it simply takes the most boring bits out of the worst thriller or horror movies you may have seen, mashes them together and actually calls itself a movie. Think of it as a movie that starts out like The Ghost and The Darkness and ends like Final Destination, and it is nowhere near as entertaining as either of those movies. I am not going to comment on acting or music or anything else because the basic plot of the movie, and its execution was so horrible and out of place, one can only stare shocked scene through scene that Karan Johar agreed to produce this. Concepts like acting, background music, etc, don't make sense when the basic framework they reside in is pure nonsense. The second thing that amazed me(the first being Karan's backing of this movie) is Ajay Devgan playing the principal character. I was always of the opinion that Ajay Devgan is an actor who follows a good script with the necessary substance, not one of those actors who would sign for a movie with the big banners because they are made by the big banners. Moreover, his character in Kaal is so ridiculous (I am struggling to find any other word to describe it), I am surprised he felt he would be making any sense acting his part out.

The peripheral characters are for the most part just as ludicrously scripted. I've read a few reviews elsewhere and comments on IMDb comparing this to an RGV production. Kaal is far from any RGV film, even Darna Mana Hai. It should be noted that at no point in this movie does it actually invoke any emotion in you, it simply drags on and on and the only reason I suffered through the whole thing was so I could write this comment with a clear conscience of having watched it in its entirety. I could speak in more detail about whatever little plot there is but most of you who have not watched it yet would probably still prefer to watch it and judge it for yourself and ignore the majority of the comments here, just as I did. To a certain extent, it is worth doing that, just to see why Karan Johar and Shah Rukh Khan should not be trusted as much as they are now.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Kaal: no dhamaal
sandhirflora23 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The hero of this film is Grrr.. And that too from Hollywood though he is making just a special appearance in one grand scene you get to know only when film is getting over but his Grrr… Grrr is there in background all through the film. Here, not just the tigers even the inspiration comes from Hollywood. This film is in the league of Indian horror "Ramu Classics"-Darna Mana Hai, Vaastu-Shastra etc so needless to say what is there in content, Here are some pearls of wisdom, which I tried to collect in the film considering theatre going audience are not bunch of fools who can be subjected to just about anything-

(1) The sole purpose of Kaali (Ajay Devgan) is to kill all the friends then why in the first place he save them from tigers? (2) Krishh Thapar (John Abraham- save our Wildlife activist Valmik Thapar) is a guy from national geographic channel still he doesn't know that in national parks no one is suppose to smoke or even carry cigarettes. (3) Kaali, a tourist guide was killed by villagers and eaten by tigers in jungle, how come Krishh not aware about this incident when he is suppose to send to jungle by national geographic special for an important investigation purpose. (4) In the story, rains are already started still one finds all roads and roadways completely dry in the jungle. (5) How come forest officers are so casual that they can't frisk visitors and allow just anybody to go into a national park with a weapon? (6) How come there is no additional security at core areas in jungle where murders happened and yet area is allowed to be encroached by just anybody. (7) A wooden bridge over the river is loose yet when a guy tries to cross it by his jeep, all his friends remain seated in the jeep putting extra burden on the bridge, Enabling it to break down. A classic group of duds. (8) Look at Screen entry of Krishh, he chases and catches a python but when his cell phone rings he just drops him and let him loose, and gets busy on his phone (9) When Characters run away from well, it is dark. While they are running away in jungle there is sufficient sunlight. How come this miracle happened?

On one hand, film talks about some vices of tourists and visitors at national park. On the other hand What a great way by our protagonists of glorifying this standard "Indian" practice of throwing cash to those poor cash-starved ones and get your way out, in just any matter? The two pretty gals, apart from showing their long legs and screaming at the drop of hat (they also happen to be love interest of our dear protagonists) I can't find a better example in recent times of portrayal of fairer sex in a most "balaji-regressive" manner. All this is not Kaal but "Akaal" of common sense. Dear producer duo, better to pull up your socks now otherwise the day is not far off when you will have to sing- "ye kaal kaal to kar gayi humein kangaal".
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed